DRAGON MARITIME GROUP As Agent of COSCO SHIPPING Lines Co

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DRAGON MARITIME GROUP As Agent of COSCO SHIPPING Lines Co DRAGON MARITIME GROUP As Agent of COSCO SHIPPING Lines Co. Ltd COSCO SHIPPING GROUP Till end July of 2018 The total fleet of China COSCO Shipping comprises of 1223 vessels with a capacity of 87.35 million DWT, ranking No. 1 of the global shipping companies Fleet size more than 86 million tons, World No.1 Special cargo Shipping , World No.1 Dry Bulk Shipping: World No.1 Container Leasing: World No.3 Tanker Shipping, World No.1 Container Shipping: Asia No.1 World No.3 Its container fleet capacity is 2.77 million TEU, ranking the Third in the world, and becomes worldwide leader in the field of multiple segment . Terminals: World No.1 The Company owns over 52 container terminals all over the world, with over 218 berthing spaces. The throughput of its container terminals worldwide amounts to 118 million TEU, taking the first place in the world COSCO SHIPPING LINES COSCO SHIPPING Lines is a fully-owned subsidiary of COSCO SHIPPING Holding Co., Ltd,registered in China (Shanghai) Free-trade Experimental Area. Company is mainly engaged in domestic and international maritime container transport services and related business, as the group's core business sector. COSCO SHIPPING COSCO SHIPPING 291 500 356 corporate enterprises container vessels international and domestic shipping routes Total 2.78 million TEUs capacity 137 domestic enterprises Consisting of 227 international services (including international feeder services) 154 enterprises abroad 2.08+0.69 million TEUs capacity 43 domestic services, 86 Yangtze River and Pearl River shipping services Covering 267 ports in 85 countries and regions worldwide. DRAGON MARITIME GROUP Dragon Maritime Group is a leading independent 2018 Group of shipping agencies in South Eastern Europe 2012 established 2005. 2009 Proudly represents COSCO SHIPPING LINES in the Western Balkans (Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia & Dragon Maritime Herzegovina, Montenegro). 2005 Dragon Maritime Bosnia & Herzegovina Slovenia (Koper) (Sarajevo) Covering cargo flow in the countries of Balkan region Dragon Maritime and Central Europe. Croatia (Rijeka) Member of the Multiport Ship Agency Network, the Dragon Maritime world’s largest independent ship agency network with Serbia (Belgrade) 10% of the worldwide agency business by port call. ENTRY PORTS IN THE REGION Koper Actual services Rijeka Future services Ploce Bar Durres Thessaloniki Piraeus AEM6 DIRECT SERVICE FE-ADRIATIC (RIJEKA) WEST BOUND • Direct call in Rijeka • Direct call in Jeddah EB • Busan direct call with fast transit time Adriatic POL POD TRANSIT TIME Shanghai Rijeka 33 days Ningbo Rijeka 31 days Busan Rijeka 28 days Shekou Rijeka 25 days Singapore Rijeka 21 days Port Said Rijeka 8 days Malta Rijeka 5 days AGT - SERVICE FROM PIRAEUS AGT - Adriatic Greece Turkey Feeder Direct calls: Piraeus, Rijeka, Koper, Ancona, Piraeus, Thessaloniki, Kumport, Haydarpasa, Izmit, Izmir • AGT-Adriatic Greece Turkey Feeder Service is a feeder service that connects ports of North Adriatic with Greece and Turkey. • Direct call to Turkish ports: Haydarpasa, Gebze(Yilport), Gemlik, Thessaloniki and Izmir • Rijeka first Port in rotation after Piraeus; transit time 2,5 days only! POL POD TRANSIT TIME Haydarpasa Rijeka 11 days Gebze(Yilport) Rijeka 10 days Gemlik Rijeka 9 days Thessaloniki Rijeka 7 days Izmir Rijeka 5 days Piraeus Rijeka 2,5 days CONTAINER THROUGHPUT VIA RIJEKA PORT VOLUME SHARE PER CARRIER VOLUME SHARE PER CARRIER (JAN-DEC 2018): (FEB 2019): MAERSK MAERSK 6% 5% COSCO/COE 6% 6% 9% COSCO/COE 33% 8% 31% MSC MSC 11% CMA CMG 11% CMA CMG HAPAG LLOYD 14% 14% HAPAG LLOYD 21% EMC/ITS 24% EMC/ITS OTHER OTHER VOLUME SHARE PER COUNTRY (JAN-DEC 2018 IN TEU) 65,114 61,810 38% TOTAL VOLUME COUNTRY SHARE (%) CROATIA (TEU) 40% SERBIA CROATIA 65.114 40% SERBIA 61.810 38% BIH (2%) 14% BIH 23.795 14% AUSTRIA (3%) AUSTRIA 6.464 4% HUNGARY HUNGARY 4.946 3% OTHER (4%) 2,507 23,795 OTHER 2.507 2% 4,946 6,464 9 RIJEKA-NEW ENTRY POINT FOR CENTRAL EUROPE AUSTRIA total volume through port of Rijeka (2018) EXPORT: 6.441 TEU IMPORT: 23 TEU HUNGARY: total volume through port of Rijeka (2018) EXPORT: 2.006 TEU IMPORT: 2.940 TEU COSCO SHIPPING LINES has launched in March two test block trains connecting Rijeka (AGCT) and Budapest, Bilk terminal. • 73 containers (144 TEU) discharged to the yard, loaded on wagons, all customs formalities done and cargo delivered to final destination in 36 Hrs. IMPROVEMENT MEASURES • What needs to be improved so that Rijeka can fully surpass the surrounding NAPA port in competitiveness? In terms of distance Rijeka is completely competitive to Central European markets! CITY Distance from port of Rijeka (km) Distance from port of Koper (km) ZAGREB 150 240 BUDAPEST 504 560 BRATISLAVA 550 550 VIENNA 495 490 PRAGUE 830 800 BELGRADE 569 630 SARAJEVO 456 650 PLANNED INVESTMENTS IN RIJEKA TRAFFIC CORRIDOR FOR COMPETITIVENESS IMPROVEMENT •Railway Connections EUR 2.1bn investments Baltic-Adriatic corridor will provide shorter distances to Austria, Czech Republic, Southern Germany and Slovakia. •Focus on projects to complete the Mediterranean corridor in such a way that the construction of the new track an second track between Rijeka-Zagreb-HU border railway line is the highest priority (Regulation (EU) 1316/2013) ŠKRLJEVO – INLAND TERMINAL – INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPLEMT INVESTMENT> 50 MILL EUR Location: 7,5 km from Port of Rijeka & Container Terminal – AGCT Total area: 400.000 m2 Direct connections: railway & A6 highway EMPTY CONTAINER DEPOT Total capacity: 2.400 TEU Surface area: 17.600 TEU Storage solutions: lenght/width 12x50 TEU height: 4+1 TEU Stuffing, unstuffing & complete repair services WAREHOUSE Open warehouses: 130.000 m2 Closed warehouses existing facilities: 43.000 m2 & new facilities 28.000 m2 Sheds new facilities 60.000 m2 New cold storage facility OUR SERVICES • Containerized shipments - 20’ & 40’ of all kind SEA • Vessels agency and husbandry in Koper • RO-RO terminal and agency services • Specialized in over-sized and over-weight cargo • Barge transportation on Danube to Constanta (Romania) • Rail deliveries via Koper to main terminals in Central INLAND Europe • Rail deliveries via Rijeka to Serbia on 2 terminals SMCT and ZIT • Rail deliveries via Piraeus to Serbia on Depolink terminal • Door to door delivery via truck or multimodal VALUE ADDED • Custom clearance and forwarding in the ports of the SERVICES Koper, Rijeka, Bar, Constanta and Piraeus • Network of own inland container depots • Warehousing and distribution in Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia Vision Contribution to the progress of regional COSCO Shipping leadership by exceeding customer expectations in an inspiring way! Mission Become regional preffered logistics company – by providing quality services to our clients, have a quick reactions and continously improve customers’ business continuity. Values Mutual Respect Excellent Service Value Creation Working in an Focus on customer’s Continous improvements environment based on needs to provide safe and and innovations are drivers trust, joint commitment effective service from our for creating of added value and respect. HUBs. for our Principal. WHY RIJEKA? Two terminals in Rijeka: • ZDSCT will be able accommodate the largest vessels in the Northern Adriatic, while • AGCT is also enlarged by a max quay depth of CD -15.0 m Terminal utilization: 42%! - room for improvement AVAILABLE TERMINAL & RAIL CAPACITY – SUPPORTING INTEGRITY OF SUPPLY CHAIN. LEADING VESSEL TO RAIL HANDLING WITHIN 8 HOURS FROM VESSEL DISCHARGE. EU CUSTOMS PROCEDURES 24/7. SHORTEST LAND DISTANCE BETWEEN TERMINAL AND CENTRAL EUROPE DESTINATIONS (BOTH ROAD AND RAIL). MOST COST-EFFECTIVE SOLUTION IN NORTH ADRIATIC. RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE READY TO SUPPORT SIGNIFICANT GROWTH – ONLY 1/3 UTILIZED (3.5 MIL TONS ANNUAL THROUGHPUT VS 9 MIL. TONS RAILWAY CAPACITY). RAILWAY MARKET LIBERALIZATION. RIJEKA IS WELL POSITIONED FOR THE NEXT VOLUME LEAP. RIJEKA’S CONTAINER MARKET IS ANTICIPATED TO GROW SUBSTANTIALLY (800K TEU PER ANNUM IN 2030). OUR ACHIEVEMENTS Three years in a row Dragon Maritime Adria – Rijeka is the best agent in Croatia! In voting of: Port Authority,Harbour Master,Terminals & Ports, Towage Co, Pilots, Customs, Immigration Year 2015-2016-2017. 18.3.2019. DRAGON MARITIME GROUP 17 CONTACT DRAGON MARITIME ADRIA Address: Korzo 11, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia telephone: (385) 51 315 501 e-mail: [email protected] Website Cosco: http://elines.coscoshipping.com/ebusiness/ Website Dragon: http://www.dragonmaritime.net/ Linkedin Dragon: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dragon-maritime/.
Recommended publications
  • Construction of the New Zagreb Deep Sea Container Terminal
    www.portauthority.hr Overview BASINS • PRA was founded in 1996 to managing, planning and strategic development port of Rijeka • Port operations contracted to various concession holders • The port of Rijeka is a multi-purpose port facility RIJEKA SUŠAK BAKAR capable of handling various type of cargo at 5 basins PORT PORT AREA • Total of 53 concessionaires and 81 (concluded) concession agreements • International concessionaires in the basic port activities • Port area management and development OMIŠALJ RAŠA • Control of arrival and departure of vessels (VTS Maneuvering Sector Rijeka) www.portauthority.hr Overview . General cargo terminal . Project and heavy cargo terminal Basin Rijeka Luka Rijeka d.d. Frigo terminal . Cereal Terminal - Silo Basin Sušak . Container Terminal Adriatic Gate Container Terminal (ICTSI Group) Škrljevo Inland Terminal - Owned by the Luka Rijeka d.d. Basin Omišalj . Oil terminal JANAF . Bulk cargo terminal Basin Bakar Luka Rijeka d.d. Ro-Ro terminal . Livestock terminal Luka Rijeka d.d. Basin Raša www.portauthority.hr. Timber terminal EXPORTDRVO ltd. Hinterland warehouse Štalije ŠERIF EXPORT – IMPORT j.s.c. Strategic position Mediterranean Corridor Baltic-Adriatic Corridor Strategic position and advantages Warsaw • Croatia’s largest international deep sea cargo port located in Berlin the Northern Adriatic Prague • The TEN-T core port located on the Mediterranean corridor Bratislava Munich Vienna • Gateway port to the Republic of Croatia and important transit Budapest Bern Bucharest port to CEE Countries (Hungary,
    [Show full text]
  • Effective 01/01/2000
    FORM 6 Equipment Providers Party to the September 27, 2021 Uniform Intermodal Interchange and Facilities Access Agreement (UIIA) All insurance information should be provided directly to the UIIA office and not to the Equipment Providers listed below. Alpha Code Name and Address of Equipment Provider ACLU ACL/Grimaldi Group/Inarme, 50 Cardinal Drive, Westfield, NJ 07090 (Equipment Group) Tel: (908)518-7352; e-mail: [email protected] ANLC ANL Singapore Pte. Ltd. (formerly: US Lines LLC), 5701 Lake Wright Drive, Norfolk, VA 23502 (Equipment Operations) Tel: (562)624-5676 Fax: (703)341-1385, Dispute contact: [email protected] LAX/Long Beach: lax- [email protected]; West Coast: [email protected]; East Coast: [email protected] cgm.com; Midwest & Gulf [email protected]; All Regions for Reefer/OpenTop/Flatrack: [email protected]; All Regions for Chassis only: [email protected] APLU APL Co. Pte Ltd, 5701 Lake Wright Drive, Norfolk, VA 23502 (Equipment Operations) Tel: (562)624-5676 Fax: (703)341- 1385, Dispute contact: [email protected]; LAX/Long Beach: [email protected]; West Coast: [email protected]; East Coast: [email protected]; Midwest & Gulf [email protected]; All Regions for Reefer/OpenTop/Flatrack: [email protected]; All Regions for Chassis only: [email protected] BANR BAL Container Line Co., Ltd., One St. Louis Centre, Suite 5000, Mobile, AL 36602 (Mike Ausmus) Tel: (251)219-3310; Fax: (251)433-1461; e-mail: [email protected] BCLU Bermuda Container Line, Limited, One Gateway Center, Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 47/Friday, March 9, 2018/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2018 / Notices 10481 waiver shall respond to comments Interested parties may submit comments Nippon Yusen Kaisha into a new received and shall provide reasons for on the agreements to the Secretary, company known as Ocean Network the ASC’s finding. The order shall be Federal Maritime Commission, Express Pte. Ltd. effective April 1, 2018. published promptly in the Federal Washington, DC 20573, within twelve Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. is Register, though in the case of an order days of the date this notice appears in added as a party. In addition, the granting a waiver, only after approval by the Federal Register. Copies of the Amendment adds Yang Ming (UK) Ltd. the FFIEC. agreements are available through the as a party (operating as a single party Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or with Yang Ming Marine Transport II. Request for Temporary Waiver; by contacting the Office of Agreements Corp.). Received Request at (202) 523–5793 or tradeanalysis@ Agreement No.: 012472–001. On November 20, 2017, a letter fmc.gov. Title: Yang Ming/COSCO Shipping requesting consideration of a temporary Agreement No.: 011830–012. Slot Exchange Agreement. waiver was received by the ASC from Title: Indamex Cross Space Charter, Parties: COSCO Shipping Lines Co., TriStar Bank, a state-chartered bank Sailing and Cooperative Working Ltd. and Yang Ming Marine Transport located in Dickson, Tennessee (the Agreement. Corporation. Requester). On November 30, 2017, ASC Parties: CMA CGM S.A.; Hapag-Lloyd Filing Party: Robert Magovern; Cozen staff replied by letter to the Requester, AG; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; and Orient O’Connor; 1200 19th Street NW; in which ASC staff described the Overseas Container Line Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • UIIA Equipment Provider Contacts for Motor Carriers Disputes
    REVISED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2021 UIIA Equipment Providers Contacts for Interchange Suspension Matters ACL/GRIMALDI GROUP/INARME EQUIPMENT GROUP TEL: (908)518-7352 [email protected] ANL SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. (FORMERLY: US LINES LLC) TEL:(757)961-2100 DISPUTE CONTACT [email protected] INTERCHANGE SUSPENSION MATTERS: PAM PURDY TEL: (757)961-2235 [email protected] INV. METHOD OF DISPUTE: [email protected] APL CO. PTE LTD DND Invoice Validation [email protected] CFC PER DIEM COLLECTIONS [email protected] OTHER DISPUTE CONTACTS ZACHARY DUPREE [email protected] [email protected] TEL: (866)574-1364 GLORIA ARUJO [email protected] BAL CONTAINER LINE MIKE AUSMUS TEL: (251)219-3310 [email protected] BERMUDA CONTAINER LINE CHRIS DUBINA TEL: (973)854-4465 [email protected] BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY GINA ELLIOTT TEL: (817)234-1158 [email protected] BRIDGE CHASSIS SUPPLY LLC (BCS) NATIONAL EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT TEL: (866)205-7063 [email protected] SEAN KINNEAR TEL: (804)762-6662 [email protected] C U LINES LIMITED MIKE AUSMUS TEL: (251)219-3310 [email protected] CANADIAN NATIONAL/ILLINOIS CENTRAL MARC SHERWOOD TEL: (905)789-2142 [email protected] CANADIAN PACIFIC CPR-US MATTHEW BLACHUCIAK TEL: (773)673-8967 [email protected] CMA-CGM (AMERICA) LLC DISPUTE CONTACT TEL:(757)961-2100 [email protected] DETENTION AND/OR DEMURRAGE DISPUTE TEAM TEL: (877)556-6308 [email protected] COFC LOGISTICS LLC GARRY OLD TEL: (419)725-0700 [email protected] REVISED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2021 COFC LOGISTICS LLC – CONTINUED M&R DISPUTES RAE WYNN TEL:(419)725-0700 [email protected] PER DIEM DISPUTES PETE SARULLO TEL:(419)725-0700 [email protected] COSCO SHIPPING LINES CO., LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 155/Monday, August 14, 2017
    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 155 / Monday, August 14, 2017 / Notices 37857 For assistance, contact FERC Online PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG and Hapag- Support. Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: Lloyd USA LLC (acting as one party); o. Scoping Process: The Commission (202) 694–1220. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen staff intends to prepare a single Laura E. Sinram, Kaisha; and Yang Ming Marine Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission. American Tissue Hydroelectric Project Transport Corp. [FR Doc. 2017–17237 Filed 8–10–17; 4:15 pm] in accordance with the National Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.; Environmental Policy Act. The EA will BILLING CODE 6715–01–P Cozen O’Conner; 1200 Nineteenth Street consider both site-specific and NW.; Washington, DC 20036. cumulative environmental impacts and Synopsis: The amendment authorizes reasonable alternatives to the proposed FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION the Parties to the Agreement to form, action. contribute funds to, develop rules for, Notice of Agreements Filed and administer a contingency fund Commission staff does not propose to designed to protect against the effects of conduct any on-site scoping meetings at The Commission hereby gives notice one of the parties experiencing financial this time. Instead, we are soliciting of the filing of the following agreements distress or an insolvency event. The comments, recommendations, and under the Shipping Act of 1984. parties have requested expedited information, on Scoping Document 1 Interested parties may submit comments review. (SD1) issued on August 8, 2017. on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, By Order of the Federal Maritime Copies of SD1 outlining the subject Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Dražen Žgaljić, Intermodal Transport Cluster
    MEDNET Pilot Actions - Croatia Dražen Žgaljić, Intermodal Transport Cluster Geneva, 9th September 2014 Pilot Action #1. Improvement of Ro-Ro Traffic: Parking Management and Customs Procedures at port of Rijeka Pilot Action #2. Improvement of Ro-Ro Traffic: Parking Management and Customs Procedures at port of Zadar Description Integration with National Customs System: that is a key entry point to the Customs paperless clearance system. The objective is to improve traffic fluidity and decrease waiting queues at the entrance and exit points of the ports of Rijeka and Zadar. Due to manual procedures, during the entry/exit operations, are causing unnecessary delays and bottlenecks. The prototype solution will disburden both the Custom officers as well as the truck drivers using improved IT solutions and reducing waiting times. "The aim of the initiative is to provide a technical solution to comply with European regulations, in order to reduce waitings at the entry/exit points of port of Rijeka and Zadar." Original situation Current situation in Port of Rijeka and port of Zadar is that there is no existing equipment of any kind at the entrance points. Implementation of these systems will allow faster and more reliable cargo flows in and out of the port. Expected results The initiative proposed is an electronic system which will introduce solution, better and faster transhipment of goods and cargos, create safer and more reliable supervision of all entities entering and leaving the port areas. Where? • Port of Rijeka Authority • Port of Zadar
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/28/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-03898, and on FDsys.gov FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)- 523-5793 or [email protected]. Agreement No.: 011679-015. Title: ASA/SERC Agreement. Parties: American President Lines, Ltd. /APL Co. Pte Ltd.; ANL Singapore Pte Ltd.; COSCO Shipping Lines Company, Ltd.; Evergreen Line Joint Service; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.; Wan Hai Lines Ltd.; and Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp. Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O’Connor; 1200 19th Street, NW; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The Amendment revises the Agreement to reflect a recently implemented name change of the Agreement from “ASF/SERC” to “ASA/SERC.” The Asian Shipowners Forum changed its name to the Asian Shipowners Association. The amendment also revises the name of one party to the Agreement, COSCO SHIPPING Lines Company Limited, and removes two other parties from the Agreement, China Shipping (Group) Company/China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd. and Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Title Page COSCO SHIPPING/PIL/WHL VESSEL SHARING AND
    Original Title Page COSCO SHIPPING/PIL/WHL VESSEL SHARING AND SLOT CHARTER AGREEMENT A SPACE CHARTER AND COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT FMC Agreement No. 012460 EXPIRATION DATE: None. This Agreement has not been published previously. COSCO SHIPPING/PIL/WHL VESSEL SHARING AND SLOT CHARTER AGREEMENT FMC Agreement No. 012460-002 First Revised Page No. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Article Name Page 1 Parties 1 2 Definitions 1 3 Undertaking and Purpose 2 4 Scope of the Agreement 4 5 Containers and Cargo 4 6 Schedules 45 7 Term of the Agreement 5 8 Booking Procedure 5 9 Delivery of Containers and Terminal Operations 56 10 Slot Costs 6 11 Documentation and Liability 6 12 Force Majeure and Termination of Agreement 67 13 Applicable Law and Arbitration 7 14 Notices 78 15 Non-Assignment 8 16 Amendment and Embodiment 89 17 Further Agreements 89 18 Agreement Officials and Delegations of Authority 9 Signature Page COSCO SHIPPING/PIL/WHL VESSEL SHARING AND SLOT CHARTER AGREEMENT FMC Agreement No. 012460 Original Page No. 1 1. Parties The parties to this Agreement are COSCO Shipping Lines Co. Ltd. (“COSCO SHIPPING”) 378 Dong Da Ming Road Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 200080 Pacific International Lines (PTE) Ltd. (“PIL”) 140, Cecil Street, #03-00, PIL Building Singapore 069540 Wan Hai Lines Ltd. (“WHLL”) 10th Floor 136 Sung Chiang Road Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C. ZIP: 104 Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd. (“WHS”) 10 Hoe Chiang Road #25-01 Keppel Towers Singapore 089315 (WHLL and WHS will operate as a single party for purposes of this Agreement, and will be referred to herein as “WHL”) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatian Logistics Opportunities for Sustainable Competitiveness Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
    Croatian Logistics Opportunities for Sustainable Competitiveness Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Croatian Logistics Public Disclosure Authorized Opportunities for Sustainable Competitiveness Luis C. Blancas Public Disclosure Authorized Ana Božičević Kristijan Rogić Ivona Bajor Luka Novačko 1 Croatian Logistics Opportunities for Sustainable Competitiveness © 2021 The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and con- clusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissem- ination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: “World Bank (2021). Croatian Logistics: Oppor- tunities for Sustainable Competitiveness. © World Bank.” All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transport - an Important Factor in the Port of Rijeka Development
    B. Hlača, D. Rudić, S. Hirnig: Rail Transport - An Important Factor in The Port of Rijeka Development BOJAN HLAČA, Ph.D. Traffic Infrastrucure E-mail: [email protected] Review Port of Rijeka Authority Accepted: July 23, 2009 Riva 1, HR-51000 Rijeka, Republic of Croatia Approved: July 5, 2010 DUŠAN RUDIĆ, Ph.D. E-mail: [email protected] Polytechnic of Rijeka Trpimirova 2/V, HR-51000 Rijeka, Republic of Croatia SAŠA HIRNIG, B.Eng. E-mail: [email protected] Polytechnic of Rijeka Vukovarska 58, HR-51000 Rijeka, Republic of Croatia RAIL TRANSPORT - AN IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE PORT OF RIJEKA DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION The economic situation and comparative advantages of The geographical position of the Adriatic Sea, the Port of Rijeka are no more than important preconditions which cuts deeply into Central Europe, with the Rijeka of its development and competitive ability. No adequate con- Port basin deep enough to accommodate the biggest nection of the Port of Rijeka to its catchment area is possible vessels, offers considerable possibilities and creates without a modern rail and road traffic. The researches and outstanding preconditions for traffic-economic assess- analyses of the port hinterland connection current state, the ment of a wider significance. results of which are provided in these documents, clearly It is its importance and the role in the traffic system indicate the need to upgrade the existing railway tracks and of the Republic of Croatia that make the Rijeka traf- build a new level Rijeka – Zagreb railway line. This line is fic route worthy of continual attention, research works a vital condition for ensuring both, a strong growth of the and analyses so that all necessary measures in terms port performances and its competitive ability vis-a-vis other of its adjustment to the new circumstances in its ei- neighbouring ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration Sea and River Ports – the Challenge of the Croatian Transport System for the 21St Century Integracija Morskih I Ri
    Integration Sea and River Ports – the Challenge of the Croatian Transport System for the 21st Century Integracija morskih i riječnih luka – izazov hrvatskog prometnog sustava za 21. stoljeće Maja Krčum Veljko Plazibat Gorana Jelić Mrčelić University of Split University of Split University of Split Faculty of Maritime Studies Faculty of Maritime Studies Faculty of Maritime Studies e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] DOI 10.17818/NM/2015/4.2 UDK 656.615(497.5)”20” Review / Pregledni rad Paper accepted / Rukopis primljen: 20. 7. 2015. Summary This paper discusses the indicators of development possibilities for sea ports of KEY WORDS national importance which are opened for public traffic: Rijeka, Ploče, Zadar, Split logistic networks and Dubrovnik, as well as for inland water ports: Vukovar, Osijek, Slavonski Brod and indicators of development Sisak. Development of traffic and logistic integration processes have been proposed possibilities for Croatian sea and river ports, based upon development factors analyses. Croatian development directions sea ports Rijeka, Ploče and inland water cargo ports Osijek, Vukovar, Slavonski Brod ports in the Republic of Croatia and Sisak have been analysed as delivery/forwarding points (nodes), taking into account the directions of goods flows, the participation in the traffic of goods, and all other relevant indicators. The integrated and coordinated approach to the ports and other subjects in the logistic chain redirects the traffic from roads to railways and inland waterways as energy efficient and environmentally – friendly forms of transportation, increases business rationality and optimal organisation users and transportation entities. Sažetak U ovom radu su analizirani pokazatelji razvojnih mogućnosti morskih luka koje su KLJUČNE RIJEČI otvorene za javni promet kao što su Rijeka, Ploče, Zadar, Split i Dubrovnik, te luke na unutarnjim vodama: Vukovar, Osijek, Slavonski Brod i Sisak.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Rijeka Authority 2013
    Port of Rijeka Authority 2013 With each day we get closer to attainment of Port Authority’s Port of Rijeka Authority can undoubtedly say that we established plans, main goal of which was to competitively position Rijeka an efficient way of execution of development infrastructural port and to create prerequisites for concessionaires’ successful projects with our concessionaires, and that investments work in encouraging environment. Numerous indicators confirm undertaken so far are a crucial result of successful execution that we are on the right path. of concessions system based on Croatia’s positive regulations. With Croatia’s accession to the EU, Rijeka becomes the first The basic precondition of Rijeka port’s development is port of call of the Union in north Adriatic. Rijeka Gateway thus good cooperation, compliance with contractual obligations becomes the intersection for merchandise traffic from Far East and acceptance of identity of business objectives of all towards Central Europe. This points the crucial part of Rijeka concessionaires, business partners and direct port community, port in national traffic strategy. Geostrategic position in which in accordance with development vision fostered by Port of Rijeka Adriatic Sea goes furthest into European continent makes Rijeka Authority. For that reason, Port of Rijeka Authority can draw the most eligible natural link to Central European markets. Two attention of potential investors to exceptional opportunity to industrial worlds, one being European markets and the other continue economic
    [Show full text]