DOCSLIB.ORG

Information to Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information to Users INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES: TRADITIONS, KNOWLEDGE, AND ADAPTATIONS AMONG BLACK FARMERS IN OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Gail Patricia Myers, M.A. The Ohio State University 2002 Dissertation Committee: Approved by: Dr. Douglas Crews, Adviser Dr. Pat Mullen Dr. Virginia Richardson Department of Anthropology Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number 30 3 9 5 0 6 __ ___ __® UMI UMI Microform 3039506 Copyright 2002 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. Ail rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT Black fanning communities developed in Ohio from the early 1800’s through the 1870’s. The impetus for the development into Ohio was its free state status and it was a short route to Canada, via the Underground Railroad. Early during this period some farmers owned land as large as 2000 acres. However, these were fragmented through inheritance, sales, and loses to others. Today’s black farmers by and large run small-scale farms of 50 to 140 acres. They have not generally been successful at sustaining farming as a business. This research is based upon the agroecoiogical model that examines relationships among people, the environment, agricultural systems, biological diversity, and traditional knowledge. I collected data from 24 African-American fanners in Ohio by observation, multiple interviews, participant observation, and archival research. These data were transcribed from tape, audio and video, and fieldnotes, and coded to computer compatible data utilizing Nud*st 4.0 software. Qualitative data collection and analysis utilized grounded theory methods, systematic and constant comparative. Structured survey data were analyzed by averages utilizing the standard deviations. Agricultural ways of today’s African American fanners are part of a tradition of ecology-based farming and representative of sustainable farming systems. Resource management decisions appear to emanate from concerns about the local ecology, family, ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. material aesthetics, kinship, and community identity. In general the data examined herein support the idea that agricultural behavior (tradition, knowledge, adaptations) provides a means to establish a cultural identity for African American farmers within a larger social system of which they are a part. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Dedicated to my wonderful mother Luevenia Mae Weems Myers In loving memory of my grandmother Carrie Lee Weems To the People of the Randolph Estate who never got their land And to all African American Farmers who ever lived and yet to arrive! iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS All praise and thanks to the creator. I could not have completed this project without the help of the farmers in this study and the other individuals who provided information and leads for this research. I would like to thank Mrs. Helen Gilmore who gave me the motivation to conduct this particular research with African American farmers. Henry Burke was a wealth of historical information and local data and I thank him for having a great sense of humor. Sincere thanks to Charles Loggins, Robert Coles, and Jon Bourdon for invaluable assistance in locating the farmers in this study. When times got tough, my resolve was rejuvenated by my family. I want to thank my mother Luevenia Myers, who as always encouraged me to follow my dreams and gave me spiritual inspirations along this academic road. To my sisters, Diane, Brinda, and Jeannette for support financially and spiritually. To my nieces and nephews, Ivory, Deannia, Jasmine, Adrianna, Genisia, Jabarri, Mitchell, Ashlee, and Ervonni for teaching me new information all the time. Much gratitude to my friends from California to New York, from Chicago to Florida, who sent money, food, and prayers to help me make it through this dissertation writing process. To my friend Wanda in Columbus who taught me a lot about many things and who always had kind words to say. I would like to thank the members of my committee for their outstanding guidance and direction throughout the writing process. A special thank you to Dr. V Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Crews, who took me into his writing wings and guided me into the next level of my scholarly writing. A special thanks also to Dr. Mullen for being ever so willing and able to assist me during those difficult transitions in the department and reading the many drafts. I am deeply indebted to my mentor Dr. Virginia Richardson for encouragement and guidance during my years at OSU and for being the rock of Gibraltar for me during my tenure at OSU. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Richard Moore for sparking my interest into this inquiry of Black Farmers. All praise and thanks to the creator. 1 gratefully acknowledge that this research was funded by a grant from the Graduate Student Alumni Research Award (GSARA). vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. VITA August 10, 1957 Bom - Daytona Beach, Florida 1991 B.A. - Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida Major English with emphasis in Creative Writing 1997 M.A. - Georgia State University Atlanta, Georgia Applied Anthropology 1999 Admission to Candidacy for Ph.D. Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University 1999-2001 Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Anthropology vii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract.............................................................................................................ii Dedication.........................................................................................................iv Acknowledgments..............................................................................................v V ita...................................................................................................................vii List of Tables..................................................................................................ix List of Illustrations..........................................................................................x Preface.............................................................................................................xi Chapters 1. Introduction..............................................................................................1 2. Methods................................................................................................. 40 3. Development of Black farming settlements............................................61 4. Black farming settlements in O hio.........................................................84 5. Black farming traditions and practices..................................................117 6. Environmental/Ecological perspectives and Sources of knowledge ... 158 7. Discussion............................................................................................. 185 Bibliography.................................................................................................... 199 Appendices: Appendix A- Introductory Letter........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moncks Corner Comprehensive Plan 2017
    MONCKS CORNER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 Planning Commission Adopted May 16, 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2017 Moncks Corner Comprehensive Plan was developed by a collaboration of the following: MONCKS CORNER PLANNING COMMISSION MONCKS CORNER TOWN COUNCIL Rev. Robin McGhee-Frazier (Co-Chair) Mayor Michael A. Lockliear Tobie Mixon (Co-Chair) David A. Dennis, Mayor Pro-Tem Mattie Gethers Johna T. Bilton Chris Griffin Charlotte A. Cruppeninck (PC Ex-officio member) Roscoe Haynes James N. Law Jr. Ryan Nelson Chadwick D. Sweatman Connor Salisbury Dr. Tonia A. Taylor Karyn Grooms (Alternate) TOWN STAFF Jeff Lord - Town Administrator Doug Polen - Community Development Director Marilyn Baker - Clerk Treasurer With assistance of the Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................3 Community Vision ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places
    NFS Form 10-900 \/jfbMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) _ J^iJ . _ .___ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service flEC? National Register of Historic Places ' *""" ! Registration Form L_ __: ._'__;i: __ This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name __________Cooper River Historic District other names/site number 2. Location street & number Along the East and West branches of the Cooper River____ not for publication _ city or town Moncks Corner_____________________________ vicinity X state South Carolina code SC county Berkeley code 015 zip code 29461 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2018 East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Randle, L.(2018). East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4962 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility By Lisa Briggitte Randle Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 1979 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 1990 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2009 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2018 Accepted by: Kenneth G. Kelly, Major Professor Leland Ferguson, Committee Member Michael E. Hodgson, Committee Member Kimberly Simmons, Committee Member Terrance Weik, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Lisa Briggitte Randle, 2018 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I am honored to dedicate this dissertation to my friend and mentor, Dr. Leland G. Ferguson, for initiating the East Branch of the Cooper River Project and for his wise words of support when the completion of this dissertation seemed overwhelming. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the financial support of the University of South Carolina’s African American Professorial Program, the Anthropology Department’s Dorothy O’Dell Travel Grant, and a grant from the Archaeological Society of South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Identity and Social Stratification in Hacienda La Esperanza, Manatí, Puerto Rico
    THE MATERIAL CULTURE OF SLAVERY: CONSUMER IDENTITY AND SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN HACIENDA LA ESPERANZA, MANATÍ, PUERTO RICO A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Nydia I. Pontón-Nigaglioni December 2018 Examining Committee Members: Paul F. Farnsworth, Advisory Chair, Department of Anthropology Anthony J. Ranere, Department of Anthropology Patricia Hansell, Department of Anthropology Theresa A. Singleton, External Member, University of Syracuse, Anthropology © Copyright 2018 by Nydia I. Pontón-Nigaglioni All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the human experience during enslavement in nineteenth-century Puerto Rico, one of the last three localities to outlaw the institution of slavery in the Americas. It reviews the history of slavery and the plantation economy in the Caribbean and how the different European regimes regulated slavery in the region. It also provides a literature review on archaeological research carried out in plantation contexts throughout the Caribbean and their findings. The case study for this investigation was Hacienda La Esperanza, a nineteenth- century sugar plantation in the municipality of Manatí, on the north coast of the island. The history of the Manatí Region is also presented. La Esperanza housed one of the largest enslaved populations in Puerto Rico as documented by the slave census of 1870 which registered 152 slaves. The examination of the plantation was accomplished through the implementation of an interdisciplinary approach that combined archival research, field archaeology, anthropological interpretations of ‘material culture’, and geochemical analyses (phosphates, magnetic susceptibility, and organic matter content as determined by loss on ignition).
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Free: Abraham Lincoln's Journey to Emancipation," 2 March Through 15 April 2005
    Introduction How was it that a nation founded on ideals of freedom and equality was also, from its birth, home to slavery? The University Libraries of the University at Buffalo were proud to host the traveling exhibition "Forever Free: Abraham Lincoln's Journey to Emancipation," 2 March through 15 April 2005. By tracing Lincoln 's journey from an anti-slavery moderate to the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation, this exhibit explores the events and ideas which gave birth to the Proclamation, which forever transformed our nation. The Emancipation Proclamation was the death blow to the "peculiar institution." Slavery was finally "That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand abolished as an American institution with the ratification of the eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in Thirteenth Amendment in December 1865. rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, Organized by the Huntington Library, San Marino, California, and including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, New York City, repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for in cooperation with the American Library Association (ALA), this their actual freedom." traveling exhibit was made possible through a major grant from Emancipation Proclamation, 1 January 1863 the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH).
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing the Plantation House: Preservation Critique in Southern Literature
    WEBB, CYNTHIA MONTGOMERY, Ph.D. Reframing the Plantation House: Preservation Critique in Southern Literature. (2015) Directed by Dr. Scott Romine. 238 pp. This dissertation contextualizes southern narrative critiques of plantation house preservation through the historic preservation movement, from its precursory development in the 1930s through today. Examining literary representations of plantation houses as historic relics in the contemporary moment, I demonstrate how a range of twentieth- and twenty-first century southern writers critique or challenge its architectural preservation. The southern plantation house has been coded in American popular culture as an exemplar of architectural heritage and a symbol of southern history, both of which beckon its preservation. Various modes of preservation, from nineteenth-century plantation fiction’s reminiscence of family homes and heroes to twenty-first century’s thriving tourism industry, figure the plantation owner’s house in romanticized ways that celebrate its architectural aesthetics, present its history through a narrow register of racial relations, and promote its nostalgic embrace. I argue that against prevailing tendencies toward various uncritical ethos of preservation, William Faulkner, Walker Percy, Alice Randall, Attica Locke, Allan Gurganus, and Godfrey Cheshire reframe the plantation house within complex historical and cultural contexts that counter the developing historic preservation movement’s popular following by illuminating the mythologies undergirding the iconic white-columned architecture and their perpetuation through its preservation. Through an interdisciplinary approach, Reframing the Plantation House combines architectural history, historic preservation, and a significant level of textual literary analysis to reveal counter-narratives that unsettle an assumed historical integrity and cultural significance associated with extant plantation houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Pinckney National Historic Site
    CHARLES PINCKNEY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY August 2000 Robert W. Blythe Emily Kleine Steven H. Moffson Cultural Resources Stewardship Southeast Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Atlanta, Georgia ii On the cover: Archeological Dig at Charles Pinckney National Historic Site, 1996. Photo courtesy of the Southeast Archeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. iii Foreword We are pleased to make available this historic resource study, as part of our ongoing effort to provide comprehensive documentation for the historic structures and landscapes of National Park Service units in the Southeast Region. Following a field survey of park resources and extensive research, the project team updated the park’s List of Classified Structures, developed historic contexts, and prepared new National Register of Historic Places documentation. Many individuals and institutions contributed to the successful completion of this work. We would particularly like to thank Charles Pinckney National Historic Site Superintendent John Tucker and his staff, and Southeast Archeological Center Chief Archeologist Bennie Keel for their assistance. This study was made possible through a cooperative agreement with the Georgia Trust for Historic Preservation. Kirk A. Cordell Chief, Cultural Resources Stewardship Southeast Regional Office August 2000 v Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE: THE ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF CHARLES PINCKNEY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, 1754-1816 19 CHAPTER TWO: THE LOW COUNTRY COASTAL COTTAGE AND SNEE FARM, 1828 - 1941 43 CHAPTER THREE: MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 53 A PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PINCKNEY WRITINGS 57 SOURCES CONSULTED 59 APPENDIX A, HISTORICAL BASE MAP A-1 vi Figure Credits Fig. 1, National Park Service; Fig. 2, Philipse Manor Hall State Historic Site, New York; Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief and True Account of the History of South Carolina Plantation Archaeology and the Archaeologists Who Practice It by Linda F
    South Carolina Antiquities, Vol. 36: 1 and 2 A Brief and True Account of the History of South Carolina Plantation Archaeology and the Archaeologists Who Practice It by Linda F. Stine and Natalie P. Adams A Brief and True Account of the History of South Carolina Plantation Archaeology and the Archaeologists Who Practice It Linda F. Stine and Natalie P. Adams INTRODUCTION This paper’s genesis is the perception that archaeologists’ communal memory of the early days of South Carolina plantation archaeology is fading, incomplete or at times overly judgmental. In order to combat this loss, some of the projects, processes and theoretical orientations that affected South Carolina’s plantation studies are explored. Examples of influential forces are the growth of Cultural Research Management (CRM), burgeoning museum and university programs in historical archaeology, and initially the Tricentennial and Bicentennial. Early references have been searched, including much of the "grey literature" and archaeologists and administrators in academia, government and private industry have been interviewed. Interview topics include early theoretical perspectives and how they relate to field and laboratory methods. Statistical methods have not been used in this study; results are interpretive and qualitative rather than quantitative. Instead, examples have been drawn from the literature of the period to illustrate trends in early South Carolina plantation archaeology. THE FIRST PLANTATION EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA Although large plantation-related CRM projects began in the late 1970s, initial plantation explorations began in South Carolina a decade earlier. In the 1960s and 1970s interest in funding historical archaeology investigations blossomed due to South Carolina and Charleston's Tricentennial (1970) and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KEYSTONE of PLANTATION WEALTH? CASE STUDIES (Under the Direction of Dr
    ABSTRACT Theresa R. Hicks. WHARVES: THE KEYSTONE OF PLANTATION WEALTH? CASE STUDIES (under the direction of Dr. Lynn Harris) Department of History, April 11, 2012. The Bowling Farm Site (001CSR), a multi-component site comprising Native American and European artifact assemblages, a wharf structure, and a shipwreck, represents a unique clue to early North Carolina history. Located on the Cashie River in Bertie County, this site may be seminal to the history of colonial North Carolina settlement and economy, since little is known about colonial settlement in this area. The primary focus of this thesis is to explore the possibility of a potential correlation between the site’s economic history, wharf construction, and the artifact assemblage by comparing Bowling Farm Site to five other plantation wharf sites located in Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. This thesis also aims to promote the importance of archaeology in understanding site history and formation processes on wharf sites while exploring the most appropriate archaeological methodologies to achieve this objective. WHARVES: THE KEYSTONE OF PLANTATION WEALTH? CASE STUDIES A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in History by Theresa R. Hicks April 2012 © copyright Theresa R. Hicks WHARVES: THE KEYSTONE OF PLANTATION WEALTH? CASE STUDIES by Theresa R. Hicks APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS _________________________________________________________ Lynn Harris, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER ________________________________________________________ Bradley Rodgers, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER ________________________________________________________ Carl Swanson, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER ________________________________________________________ Tony Boudreaux, Ph.D. CHAIR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY _____________________________________ Gerald J.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (June 1991) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instruction in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Resources of the Cooper River, ca. 1670-ca. 1950 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Historic and Archaeological Resources of the Cooper River, ca. 1670-ca. 1950 C. Form Prepared by Andrew W. Chandler, Architectural Historian; Valerie Marcil, Archaeologist; J. Tracy Power, Historian; and Stephen W. Skelton, Preservation Programs Supervisor South Carolina State Historic Preservation Office South Carolina Department of Archives and History 8301 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 (803) 896-6178 Katherine Saunders, Preservation Planning Coordinator, and Jonathan H. Poston, Director of Preservation Historic Charleston Foundation 40 East Bay Street Charleston, S.C. 29401 (843) 724-8486 Carl Steen and Ellen Shlasko, Archaeologists Diachronic Research Foundation P.O. Box 50394 Columbia, S.C. 29250 (803) 929-0294 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Country Gullah Culture Special Resource Study and Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Low Country Gullah Culture National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Special Resource Study and Southeast Regional Office Final Environmental Impact Statement Atlanta, Georgia Low Country Gullah Culture Special Resource Study and Final Environmental Impact Statement July 2005 National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Planning and Compliance Division 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 www.nps.gov This document may be cited as: National Park Service. Low Country Gullah Culture Special Resource Study and Final Environmental Impact Statement. Atlanta, GA: NPS Southeast Regional Office, 2005. ii Low Country Gullah Culture Special Resource Study Table of Contents 1 Purpose and Need for the Study Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Management Alternatives.............................................................................................................................. 2 Public and Community Involvement........................................................................................................... 3 Meeting Transcripts................................................................................................................................ 4 Transcript Analysis.................................................................................................................................. 4 Small Meetings in Key Counties...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eyre Hall Other Nameisite Number
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Fonn 10-900 USDINPS NRHP Registration Fonn (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-00 18 EYRE HALL Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Sewice National Register of Historic Places Registration Form - --- 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Eyre Hall Other NameISite Number: NIA 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 32 15 Eyre Hall Drive Not for publication: NIA CityITown: Cheriton Vicinity: State: Virginia County: Northampton Code: 131 Zip Code: 23316 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property . Category of Property Private: -X Building(s): - Public-Local: - District: X- Public-State: - Site: - Public-Federal: - Structure: - Object: - Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing -4- -1 1 buildings -3 -0 sites -1 -3 structures -0- -0 objects -8 -14 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register:_l Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDINPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-00 1 8 EYRE HALL Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATEIFEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]