DOCSLIB.ORG

N E W S L E T T E R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
N E W S L E T T E R N E W S L E T T E R The Doreen B. Townsend Center for the Humanities September 1999 Counting Down and Moving On Before people worried about computer bugs, a new millennium was supposed to herald a “fullness of time.” Never mind that Y1K was a dud or that Y2K, correcting for old mistakes, should have arrived three or four years ago. Millennium or not, our plans for 1999-2000 are already close to full and overflowing. On my own calendar this will be my fourth and final year as director of the Center. Now and then during the year I’m going to take lame duck liberty to say something about the directions in which the Center has been moving—or not. The academic year’s first Newsletter is a good opening. It gives real content to a standing mission “to gather the diverse energies of the humanities and the arts,” but it also points in new directions. The “gathering” metaphor was Christina Gillis’s happy inspiration and is still perfectly apt. As we were reminded on the occasion of the Center’s tenth anniversary, the founding principle was that the Berkeley campus should have a combination of switchboard, forum, workshop, and occasional funding source to link the humanities disciplines and related fields in the arts, human sciences, and professions. Parallel institutions were being established elsewhere around the same time for reasons ranging from interdisciplinary interest to administrative hedging against diminishing resources, but in the ecology of the humanities at Berkeley this one would draw on traditionally strong departments that were likely, precisely because of their strengths, to lack the connections that a humanities center could build and thrive on. With a broad and deep academic hinterland, it did not need and certainly could not expect its own faculty appointments, external fellows, research and teaching agendas, or extensive staff. To tweak the metaphor a little, the Townsend Center was a “hunter-gatherer” on the graph of academic evolution. This proved to be a winning recipe for institution-building of a cumulative sort. Costs were relatively modest and, until regular funding was secured, pegged to start-up resources rather than to the fever chart of grantsmanship. The mission was broad but open-ended so that programs could be added as needs and possibilities beckoned. There are no fewer than twelve program rubrics on our website, from the core fellows group to working groups, Center-initiated or co-sponsored events, visiting 1 professorships, publications, programs on Belief, joins the oldest of odd couples in “public values,” support for the humanities and questions charged interdisciplinary seminars, and with contemporary relevance. Scholars information for faculty and students. workingin different fields will bring their Of course the Center did not “just own definitions, dge & e ter B l n f grow” without generous infusions of e o e approaches, and w C r l i o d t e n n h e f hands-on and minds-on effort, and e concerns to bear on s K n H w u o m T a n s i t e 1 i evolution also works by leaps, not just by 0 the subject. This is a 9 0 9 0 gradual steps and stages. The Center can 9 2 good reason for a travel more lightly than academic divisions interdisciplinary center to or departments; it has openings and foster an exchange among them; another obligations to forge new combinations and is that received answers and indeed ways venture into new territory. Just within the of posing the relevant questions are in Contents last few months, for example, we some disarray, not for the first time of Counting Down & Moving On concluded a year of programs on course. How are we think through the 1 international perspectives in the claims of science and religion, proof and Sepember Song 3 humanities, won a national grant from the persuasion, certainty and opinion, nature Townsend Center Woodrow Wilson Foundation, and made and culture at this end of the century and Fellowship Group 6 fresh alliances close to home with the new the millennium? What can be learned 1999-2000 Humanities campus Consortium for the Arts, the across cultural differences and historical Funding Update 11 Institute of International Studies, the analogies over and perhaps against the International Working Center for Japanese Studies, and our contemporary drumbeat that insists our Group Program 14 thriving offspring, the Human Rights problems of knowing and believing are Working Groups Center. These partnerships will bring new global and unprecedented? I realize that 15 initiatives and, beginning in the fall of 2000, these are still sketchy lines of inquiry. I Calendar 16 the first post-doctoral fellows to the Center. won’t try to elaborate on them further Townsend Center Events At the same time, the Marian E. Koshland here, however, because that is what I 23 endowment has given the Center a source anticipate from a Townsend Center series Major Lectures & Conferences 23 of “venture capital” that we have on knowledge and belief, beginning with Performances & Exhibits committed, among other things, to a new the panel of Berkeley scholars that will 25 Forum on Science, Technology, and the launch the series on September 28. Announcements 26 Humanities and to a series of annual Meanwhile let the countdown Townsend Center programs on issues that call for wide- begin…. Announcements 27 ranging exploration and engagement in the Randolph Starn, Director humanities. Marian E. Koshland Distinguished This year’s theme, Knowledge and Professor in the Humanities 2 September Song belief theme with two lectures scheduled for early November under the rubric, As depicted in a recent photograph of the “Conversion in Early Modern Europe: Two east terrace of Stephens Hall, the Studies.” The first lecture, “Conversion balustrade, dominating the near distance, and Astrology: Theory, Experience and seems to demarcate a kind of stage from Cosmology,” will take place on the evening (Genevieve Shiffrar) which one looks out to the shadowy trees of November 1, the second, “Conversion Studies), Susanna Elm (History), Jodi of Faculty Glade. Clear focus in the and Autobiography: Pattern, Experience Halpern (Joint Medical Program), and foreground contrasts with trees and sky and Salvation,” the evening of November Barry Stroud (Philosophy). On October 8, that are more suggested than defined. 3. Both lectures will be at Alumni House at 12 noon in the Geballe Room, Wendy There is a sense of expectation here, of at 8 pm. Doniger, Mircea Eliade Distinguished waiting for what is to come. Particularly Service Professor of the History of Avenali Lectures in September, we are reminded that the Religions at the University of Chicago, will In April, Bruno Latour, one of the major Center itself is a staging place where deliver a lecture entitled, "Are Carnal founders of the social studies of science people and ideas gather, and it is a site that Ignorance and Carnal Knowledge Cross- and a member of the faculty at the Centre provides both a lens and a focus on the Cultural Categories?" Future speakers will de Sociologie de l’Innovation at the Ecole activity that helps define the humanities include Steven Shapin, Professor of Des Mines de Paris, will hold the Avenali on the campus: on the conferences and Sociology at UC San Diego, who will be Chair in the Humanities attached to the symposia, residencies, lectures, working here in mid-February (specific date to be Townsend Center. Professor Latour, group meetings, and publication projects announced) to address “Vulgar author of a series of important books, that will all be part of this new year. Epistemology”; and Carlo Ginzburg, including Laboratory Life, a classic text Professor of History at UCLA, who will be exploring the different steps in the Knowledge and Belief at the Center March 6-7 to present construction of scientific facts, will spend Knowledge and Belief, this year’s program “Stendhal’s Challenge to Historians.” three weeks on the campus . In addition initiative begins, as Randolph Starn has Exploring the sometimes vexed territory to delivering the Avenali Lecture, which already mentioned, on September 28 at 4 of knowledge and belief, the Center also will take up the politics of nature, Professor pm in the Geballe Room (220 Stephens), plans in the course of the year various Latour will conduct a special seminar in with a panel entitled “Knowledge and events, including film screenings and which he intends to pursue what he calls a Belief: How Do We Decide? Perspectives discussions, taking up issues such as the “systematic analysis of information Across Cultures.” Participants in the “repatriation” of relics and remains. systems” (a “critique of pure panel, which has been organized under the information”). Further details on this Una’s Lecture Center’s ongoing emphasis, “Practicing year’s Avenali residency will be This year’s Una Lecturer, Anthony the Humanities at Berkeley,” include announced in a future newsletter. Grafton, Professor of History at Princeton, Aditya Behl (South and Southeast Asian contributes also to the knowledge and Studies), Daniel Boyarin (Near Eastern 3 Fellows Question of Philosophy,” a conference The Townsend Fellows Group meets where the “talking cure” of psychoanalysis weekly for lunch and presentation of work is intended to meet the “reason” of in progress. Details on the 1999-2000 philosophy, has been organized for Group appear in a special article on page September 25-26 by Professor Judith Butler six of this Newsletter. and the Department of Rhetoric. The conference will take place on September Working Groups 25-29 (see conference listing in this The Townsend Center Working Groups Newsletter). On the same weekend program remains one of the strongest of (September 24-25), the Department of our core programs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 14484 Convivium 25.Indd 167 14/10/13 09:33 168 Renate Holub
    TOWARDS A GLOBAL SPACE OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS: ON BENJAMIN, GRAMSCI, AND POLANYI1 Renate Holub University of California. Berkeley ABSTRACT In this article, I approach Benjamin, Gramsci, and Polanyi as members of a par- ticular generation in Europe. Since all three of them were born late in the 19th century, they could not but experience a range of world-historical events. These ranged from World War One, the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, and failed attempts at socialist revo- lutions on the European continent to the rise of fascism in Italy and Germany, the expan- sion of European colonialism in the Middle East, the spectacular collapse of the transat- lantic capitalist financial system in October of 1929, and the gradual assumption of shared geopolitical hegemony on the part of the United States and the Soviet Union. By the same token, Benjamin, Gramsci, and Polanyi, as European intellectuals, could not but develop their predominant conceptions of the world in the context of a particular space of intellectual systems [Idealism, Marxism, Utilitarianism, Positivism, Historicism, etc]. While all of these intellectual systems involved epistemological, ontological, and ethical standards, some of them participated in the separation of these three provinces of standards from each other, thereby promoting traditions of philosophic – methodological individualization or specialization of branches of knowledge while others tended to con- tinue to methodologically combine these three provinces to various degrees. Benjamin, Gramsci, and Polanyi thus moved in an intellectual space in which there had emerged multiple contests about the relations between ideas and social practices, on one hand, individuals and collectives, on the other hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Quaderni Del Carcere : the Political Project of Antonio Gramsci
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-2006 Reading the Quaderni del carcere : the political project of Antonio Gramsci. Manuel S. Almeida Rodriguez University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Almeida Rodriguez, Manuel S., "Reading the Quaderni del carcere : the political project of Antonio Gramsci." (2006). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2401. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2401 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. READING THE QUADERNI DEL CARCERE: THE POLITICAL PROJECT OF ANTONIO GRAMSCI A Dissertation Presented by MANUEL S. ALMEIDA RODRIGUEZ Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2006 Department of Political Science © Copyright by Manuel S. Almeida Rodriguez 2006 All Rights Reserved READING THE QUADERNI DEL CARCERE: THE POLITICAL PROJECT OF ANTONIO GRAMSCI A Dissertation Presented by MANUEL S. ALMEIDA RODRIGUEZ Approved as to style and content by: £ Nicholas Xenos, Chair DEDICATION To my loving daughter. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project is the end result of a long intellectual journey began almost seven years ago, when I first read Gramsci and visited the Fondazione Istituto Gramsci in Rome. I have incurred in many debts of gratitude since then. First, 1 would like to thank my chair, Nicholas Xenos, for his continual support, engaging discussion, and constant feedback through graduate school.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Problem in Dante
    The Linguistic Problem in Dante: A Gramscian Pathway toward the Modern Vernacular World By Stefano Selenu B.A., Università di Bologna, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Italian Studies at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2010 © 2010 by Stefano Selenu This dissertation by Stefano Selenu is accepted in its present form by the Department of Italian Studies as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date _______________ __________________________________ Ronald L. Martinez, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date _______________ __________________________________ Massimo Riva, Reader Date _______________ __________________________________ Suzanne Stewart-Steinberg, Reader Date _______________ __________________________________ Joseph A. Buttigieg, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date _______________ _________________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Stefano Selenu was born on April 17, 1978 in Carbonia, Sardinia (Italy). He holds an Italian laurea cum laude in Philosophy from the University of Bologna. His research focuses primarily on the intersections of language, literature, and politics in Italian culture and history, with a comparative approach across class, gender, geographical, and cultural boundaries. His specific interests include Dante and early modern literature; Antonio Gramsci and Marxism; Italian literature and philosophy; theories of history, politics, and language; history of Italian and Sardinian languages and philology. In 2005, his tesi di laurea was awarded the first Antonio Gramsci Prize, which included the publication in the collection Antologia del Premio Gramsci. IX Edizione (Sassari: EDES, 2006. 223-358). This work investigates the question of Sardinian language standardization in connection with both Antonio Gramsci‟s thought on philology, contemporary philosophy of language and romance linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • International Gramsci Journal
    INTERNATIONAL GRAMSCI JOURNAL No. 3 March 2011 INTERNATIONAL GRAMSCI JOURNAL ISSN: 1836-6554 The International Gramsci Journal (IGJ) is the electronic journal of the International Gramsci Society. The journal publishes matters of general interest to Gramsci scholars (Gramsci Notes), as well as peer-reviewed scholarly articles about Antonio Gramsci's life and work, the influence of his thinking on social, political, economic and cultural history and the application of his concepts to contemporary life. International Gramsci Journal Editorial Board • Derek Boothman, Italy • Joseph Buttigieg, U.S.A • Ben Fontana, U.S.A • Marcus Green, U.S.A • Renate Holub, U.S.A • Peter Ives, Canada • Domenico Jervolino, Italy • Guido Ligouri, Italy • Richard Howson, Australia • Rita Medici, Italy • Adam David Morton, United Kingdom • Carlos Nelson Coutinho, Brazil • Koichi O'Hara, Japan • David F. Ruccio, U.S.A IGJ’s Editorial Committee at University of Wollongong, Australia is: • Charles Hawksley, Editor • Susan Engel, Assistant Editor • Teresa Crosland, Production Editor For all correspondence with IGJ please email Charles Hawksley, IGJ editor at: [email protected] Submissions to IGJ may be in English, Italian, Spanish or Portuguese. For instructions on submission for peer review to IGJ please refer to the website: http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/research/gramsci-journal/index.html Cover: 1922 photograph of Antonio Gramsci from: http://www.internationalgramscisociety.org/about_gramsci/photo_archive/index.html. ii INTERNATIONAL GRAMSCI JOURNAL NO. 3 MARCH
    [Show full text]
  • International Gramsci Journal
    INTERNATIONAL GRAMSCI JOURNAL No. 3 March 2011 INTERNATIONAL GRAMSCI JOURNAL ISSN: 1836-6554 The International Gramsci Journal (IGJ) is the electronic journal of the International Gramsci Society. The journal publishes matters of general interest to Gramsci scholars (Gramsci Notes), as well as peer-reviewed scholarly articles about Antonio Gramsci's life and work, the influence of his thinking on social, political, economic and cultural history and the application of his concepts to contemporary life. International Gramsci Journal Editorial Board • Derek Boothman, Italy • Joseph Buttigieg, U.S.A • Ben Fontana, U.S.A • Marcus Green, U.S.A • Renate Holub, U.S.A • Peter Ives, Canada • Domenico Jervolino, Italy • Guido Ligouri, Italy • Richard Howson, Australia • Rita Medici, Italy • Adam David Morton, United Kingdom • Carlos Nelson Coutinho, Brazil • Koichi O'Hara, Japan • David F. Ruccio, U.S.A IGJ’s Editorial Committee at University of Wollongong, Australia is: • Charles Hawksley, Editor • Susan Engel, Assistant Editor • Teresa Crosland, Production Editor For all correspondence with IGJ please email Charles Hawksley, IGJ editor at: [email protected] Submissions to IGJ may be in English, Italian, Spanish or Portuguese. For instructions on submission for peer review to IGJ please refer to the website: http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/research/gramsci-journal/index.html Cover: 1922 photograph of Antonio Gramsci from: http://www.internationalgramscisociety.org/about_gramsci/photo_archive/index.html. ii INTERNATIONAL GRAMSCI JOURNAL NO. 3 MARCH
    [Show full text]
  • Gramsci and Cultural Studies in the Dual Economy of the United States a Preliminary Sketch1 Di Renate Holub*
    Gramsci and cultural studies in the dual economy of the United States A preliminary sketch1 di Renate Holub* ABSTRACT In this article, I have tried to submit patterns in US academic cultural studies and Gramsci scholar- ship to a brief comparative analysis against the background of the generic amalgamations of three national formations by the 1980’s: reproduction and maintenance of a consumerist “common sense” through credit card debts, accelerations in economic under-developments in a dual-econ- omy, and the cultural reproduction of a collective psychic anchorage in self-perceptions of ex- ceptionality and moral superiority in relation to racialized “others” in domestic and international spheres. My analysis distinguished patterns in academic cultural studies from those in Gramsci scholarship in that the former predominantly focused on aspects of discriminatory representa- tions in the cultural practices of the “national” spheres whereas the latter tended to orient itself on “international” analyses in human geography, environmental studies, climate change, development theory, global social moments, global conservatisms, and so on. I concluded that in light of the im- portant role which the Gramsci’s legacy had assumed in the UK Birmingham School, the moment is opportune and necessary for Gramsci scholars in the US, as elsewhere, to make use of the most important Gramsci-inspired diagnostic instruments in the development of comprehensive research projects on the neo-liberal manipulations of the material and emotional institutions of diverse populations amidst a dual economy defined post-democratic age. he academic rise of cultural nipulating public consciousness and con- studies by the 1980’s coin- duct2.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio Gramsci Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism by Renate Holub
    ANTONIO GRAMSCI CRITICS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY General Editor: Christopher Norris, University of Wales, College of Cardiff A.J.GREIMAS AND THE NATURE OF MEANING Ronald Schleifer CHRISTOPHER CAUDWELL Robert Sullivan FIGURING LACAN Criticism and the Cultural Unconscious Juliet Flower MacCannell HAROLD BLOOM Towards Historical Rhetorics Peter de Bolla JULIA KRISTEVA John Lechte GEOFFREY HARTMAN Criticism as Answerable Style G.Douglas Atkins EZRA POUND AS LITERARY CRITIC K.K.Ruthven F.R.LEAVIS Michael Bell DELEUZE AND GUATTARI Ronald Bogue POSTMODERN BRECHT A Re-Presentation Elizabeth Wright THE ECSTASIES OF ROLAND BARTHES Mary Bittner Wiseman PAUL RICOEUR S.H.Clark JURGEN HABERMAS Critic in the Public Sphere Robert C.Holub WILLIAM EMPSON Prophet Against Sacrifice Paul H.Fry ANTONIO GRAMSCI Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism Renate Holub LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 1992 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 1992 Renate Holub All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Holub, Renate Antonio Gramsci: beyond Marxism and postmodernism.— (Critics of the twentieth century) I.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 3, March 1994
    International Gramsci Society Newsletter March 1994 Number 3 International Gramsci Society Newsletter March 1994 Number 3 If you are reading this document using the Adobe Acrobat Reader, you may click on the items listed in the table of contents to go directly to that page (the entries are hyperlinked). EDITORIAL 1 EDITING ANTHOLOGIES OF GRAMSCI 4 GRAMSCI IN COLOMBIA 10 GRAMSCI’S PRESENCE IN INDIA 18 GRAMSCI IN JAPAN 22 GRAMSCI BIBLIOGRAPHY 27 A NOTE ON E. W. SAID’S CULTURE AND IMPERIALISM 46 GRAMSCIAN APPROACHES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 47 “READING GRAMSCI”—A GRADUATE COURSE 49 CONFERENCES 52 NEW DOCUMENTARY FILM ON GRAMSCI 54 GRAMSCI ON FILM/VIDEO & MEMBERS’ NOTES 55 Editor: Joseph A. Buttigieg The editor thanks the following for their generous help in preparing this issue of the IGS Newsletter: Nila Gerhold, Frank Rosengarten, and David Ruccio. Production of the IGS Newsletter was made possible by the support of the English Department of the University of Notre Dame. Editorial The creation of the International Gramsci Society was animated by a desire to bring individuals studying the life and thought of Antonio Gramsci in different countries and from diverse perspectives in direct or indirect contact with each other. From the start, members of the IGS wanted to learn more about the interpretations and uses of Gramsci that were taking place in countries and in disciplines other than their own. In this issue of the IGS Newsletter we have made a special effort to stress the international dimensions of Gramscian studies with information from countries as diverse as Colombia, India, and Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S L E T T E R
    N E W S L E T T E R The Doreen B. Townsend Center for the Humanities November - December 1997 IN FROM THE MARGINS: CENTRAL ASIAN HUMANITIES STUDIES AT BERKELEY When I first mention Berkeley Central Asia/Silk Road Working Group to scholars whose own work is fully outside the ambit of Central Asian studies, their first response is often something like: Wonderful. Ah, by the way, what is it that defines Central Asia, exactly? And while this is, quite literally, one of the fundamental questions within the community of Central Asia scholars, it also reflects the twilight in which Central Asia in general, and Central Asia humanities scholarship in particular, has languished in American universities. In both public imagination and academic focus, Central Asia has long been marginalized as a vaguely defined region land-locked somewhere among the ancient Graeco-Roman, Near Eastern, Chinese and Indian civilizations, and buffeted by the modern powers of the Soviet Union, China, India and Iran. There has been little attention paid in our universities to the region’s art and archaeology, languages and literature, belief systems and other cultural productions. And what academic work has been done is often produced by scholars who are scattered through many different academic departments, working in isolation from, and often unaware of, each other. This conceptual marginalization of Central Asia is in large measure the result of the now widely discussed overall tilt toward Europe in humanities and social science studies in virtually all American universities. Such marginalization was reinforced by the long night of Cold War politics which for so long severely hindered Western research in and about Central Asia, discouraging succeeding generations of scholars from entry into fields of study which focused on the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Morbid Symptoms: Gramsci and the Political Rhetoric of Futurism
    Morbid Symptoms Gramsci and the Political Rhetoric of Futurism Sascha Bru Shortly after a rumour began circulating in the fall of 1920 that Filippo Tommaso Marinetti had converted to communism, Antonio Gramsci, the intellectual leader of the Italian Communist Party (PCI), issued an essay entitled “Marinetti Rivoluzionario?” in the communist daily L’ordine nuovo.1 The essay claimed that Marinetti and his Futurist comrades could count on considerable support from the working class,2 and it depicted the Futurists as true Marxists in the bourgeois aesthetic sphere. On 6 January 1921, L’ordine nuovo published the programme of Gramsci’s newly launched Istituto di Cultura Proletario in Turin, which announced educational and artistic projects for the working class. Throughout the same year, critical but constructive assessments of Futurism continued to appear in the communist daily, as if Gramsci were looking to win the Futurists over to join his Institute. And sure enough, a number of Futurist ‘officials’ (Carlo Frasinelli, Franco Rampa Rossi and Fillia) went on to co-operate with the Turin communists. In less than two years, jointly they organised various Futurist exhibitions (the first one opened by Marinetti giving a speech3), published a number of poetry collections and manifestoes, produced Fillia’s first play Sensualità, and eventually established a Futurist artistic syndicate. The latter managed to attract more than a thousand members in less than a year, which 1 The essay is reproduced in an English translation in Antonio GRAMSCI, Selections from Cultural Writings, ed. David Forgacs, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985, 49–52. Hereafter referred to parenthetically as SCW.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentia: Review of Italian Thought Contributors
    Differentia: Review of Italian Thought Number 5 Spring Article 27 1991 Contributors Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/differentia Recommended Citation (1991) "Contributors," Differentia: Review of Italian Thought: Vol. 5 , Article 27. Available at: https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/differentia/vol5/iss1/27 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Academic Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Differentia: Review of Italian Thought by an authorized editor of Academic Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Contributors LUIGI ANTINUCCI is a member of the Arte Debate group and has exhibited in Italy as well as in Europe and the United States. PIETRO BELLASI is a member of the Arte Debole group based in Turin and has had shows in Italy as well as in Europe and the United States. SERGIO BENVENUTO is co-founder of the Centro Sperimentale di Psicoanalisi in Rome, co-editor of Lettera lnternazionale, and author of La strategia freudiana (Milano 1984) and Contini dell 'lnterpretazione. Freud , Feyerabend, Foucault (Castrovillari 1988). ANGELA BIANCOFIORE is an artist based in Bari and Paris. She is completing a doctorate in the Philosophy of Language at the University of Bari and is author of Paul Valery; /'opera e ii metodo (Lecce, 1990). PETER CARRA VETIA , founding editor of DIFFERENT/A, is Professor of Ital­ ian at Queens College/CUNY and author of Prefaces to the Diaphora: Rhe­ torics, Allegory and the Interpretation of Postmodemity (Purdue UP, 1991) . ALESSANDRO CARRERA is cultural attache at the Italian Cultural Institute in Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • GCN VI 01.Pdf (8.653Mb)
    GERMAN CULTURE NEWS CORNELL UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR GERMAN CULTURAL STUDIES December IY97 Volume VI No J RETROSPECTIVE OF "DIALECTIC OF GERMAN COLLOQUIUM: " ENLIGHTENMENT - . '" ' FALL 1997 '6Dh ='~' ", REVISITED, 1947-1997" , . Michael Richardson Richard Schaefer and "*' , John Kim On Saturday, November 22, 1997, the Institute for Gennan Cultural Studies The Institute for Gennan Cultural Stud­ hosted aday.Iong symposium atCornell's ies Fait Colloquium series included a · II A.D, White House on the occasion of the George Mosse wide array of original. yet interrelated fiftieth anniversary of the appearance of papers. The colloquium began with a GEORGE MOSSE ON Max Horkheimer's and Theodor presentation by Andreas Huyssen. Pr0­ Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. fessor of Gennan at Columbia Univer­ "THE CONCEPTS OF Organized by Peter U. Hohendahl, the sity. Huysscn's paper, entitled "The Dis­ symposium brought together a group of turbance of Vision in Vienna Modern­ DEMOCRACY" interesting panelists from across the dis­ ism," represcmcd a preliminary draft of ciplines to reflect on the work and its his project on Viennese modernism, a Rachel Nussbaum contemporary relevance. The diverse project that developed out of his interest composition of the symposium and its in KUT7Prosa and its micrological look at participants. of course, itself reflected modem life. Uncomfortable with using George Mosse, the A. D. White Profes­ both the multi-disciplinary nature of the genre as a criterion for evaluation. he sor-at-Large at Cornell University and work as well as the expansive interests of instead focused his discussion through John C. Bascom Professor Emeritus of those thinkers associated with what was the issue of visuality.
    [Show full text]