The Regulation of Debt Collection Practices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Regulation of Debt Collection Practices THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF HONG KONG REPORT THE REGULATION OF DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES This report can be found on the Internet at: <http://www.info.gov.hk/hkreform> July 2002 The Law Reform Commission was established by the Executive Council in January 1980. The Commission considers such reforms of the laws of Hong Kong as may be referred to it by the Secretary for Justice or the Chief Justice. The members of the Commission at present are: The Hon Ms Elsie Leung Oi Sie, GBM, JP, Secretary for Justice (Chairman) The Hon Mr Justice Andrew Li, Chief Justice Mr Tony Yen, SBS, JP, Law Draftsman Dr John Bacon-Shone Hon Mr Justice Bokhary, PJ Mr Anthony Chow Mr Victor Chu Lap- lik Professor Y K Fan, JP Ms Betty Ho Mr Alan Hoo, SC Mr Kwong Chi Kin Dr Lawrence Lai, JP Hon Mrs Sophie Leung, SBS, JP Mr David Smith The Secretary of the Commission is Mr Stuart M I Stoker and its offices are at: 20/F Harcourt House 39 Gloucester Road Wanchai Hong Kong Telephone: 2528 0472 Fax: 2865 2902 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.info.gov.hk/hkreform THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF HONG KONG Report The regulation of debt collection practices ______________________________________________________ CONTENTS Page Preface 1 Terms of reference 1 The Sub-committee 1 1. Debt collection in Hong Kong 4 Introduction 4 Statistics on personal credit delinquency 4 Statistics compiled by the Police 5 Statistics compiled by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority 7 Statistics compiled by the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data 8 Industry overview 9 2. Some features of extra-judicial debt collection 12 Stages of debt collection 12 Different types of debt collection activities 12 Non-judicial debt collection 13 What causes abusive debt collection? 15 The nature of the debt collection process 15 The lack of professionalism among some debt collectors 16 Loose-lending 17 Economic downturn 17 The judicial process in debt recovery 17 Other factors 18 3. Existing criminal sanctions against abusive 19 debt collection Criminal law sanctions 19 Intimidation 19 i Criminal damage to property 21 Threats to kill or murder 22 Theft and blackmail 22 Assault 24 Mens rea for assault 25 False imprisonment 26 Forcible detention 28 Triad offences 29 Summary Offences Ordinance (Cap 228) 30 Post Office Ordinance (Cap 98) 31 Criminal sanctions for participation 31 The principal 31 Secondary participation 31 Vicarious liability 33 Corporate liability 33 4. Existing civil remedies for abusive debt collection 35 Civil remedies for abusive debt collection 35 Trespass to the person 35 False imprisonment 36 Remedies for assault, battery and false imprisonment 37 Intentional physical harm other than trespass to the person / 37 Intentional infliction of emotional distress Trespass to chattels 39 Defamation 40 Negligence 40 Liability for tortious acts committed by others 41 Master and servant 41 Employer’ s liability for independent contractors 45 Principal’ s vicarious liability for torts committed by agent 45 Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance 49 5. Other types of control on debt collection 50 Administrative control 50 Self-regulation by authorized institutions 50 Code of Banking Practice – 1997 50 Code of Banking Practice – December 2001 50 Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap 486) and the 56 Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data 2002 Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance 56 Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data 2002 57 6. Deficiencies of the existing controls 59 on abusive debt collection practices Criminal law 59 Civil claims 60 Self-regulation by authorized institutions 61 ii Code of Banking Practice – December 2001 61 Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap 486) and the 62 Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data – 2002 7. Comparative Law 64 Introduction 64 United Kingdom 64 The criminal offence of unlawful harassment of debtors 64 Protection from Harassment Act 1997 66 England and Wales 67 Offence of harassment 67 Offence of putting people in fear of violence 67 Civil remedy 68 Scotland 68 Malicious Communications Act 1988 69 Australia 70 Federal legislation 70 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v 71 McCaskey & Cash Return Mercantile PTY Ltd Other provisions against abusive collection tactics 74 The United States of America 75 The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 75 Harassment or abuse 75 False, deceptive, or misleading 77 representations or means Unfair practices 78 Communications in connection with debt collection 79 Acquisition of location information 79 Further protection to consumers 80 Canada 81 Federal 81 Alberta 81 Mainland China 83 Other jurisdictions 84 8. Licensing in other jurisdictions 85 Introduction 85 United Kingdom 85 Criteria for licensing 86 Criminal sanctions for operating without a licence 87 Civil sanctions for operating without a licence 88 Australia 88 New South Wales 89 Licensing Police, NSW Police 91 Review of the present NSW legislation 91 Victoria 92 Similar Legislation 93 Canada 95 iii Alberta 95 South Africa 97 9. Consumer credit data 100 Introduction 100 Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance 100 Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data 100 Sharing of positive credit data in other jurisdictions 101 US Fair Credit Reporting Act 102 US Equal Credit Opportunity Act 104 Australian Commonwealth Privacy Act 104 United Kingdom Data Protection Act 1998 105 Situation in Hong Kong 106 10. Proposals for reform 108 The criminal offence of unlawful harassment of debtors and others 108 Responses 109 General or specific 109 Modifications 110 Law Reform Commission Report on Stalking 111 Other features of the offence 113 Criminal sanctions for participation 114 Licensing 114 Responses 117 UK Office of Fair Trading’ s review of the licensing system 117 Conclusion on Licensing 119 Whether a person who knowingly engages an unlicensed 119 collection agency equally commits an offence Civil liability of a creditor in respect of the acts of the debt collector 119 Commercial vs consumer debts 120 Responses 120 Licensing authority 121 Responses 122 Collection agencies and collectors 122 Responses 123 Exemptions from licensing 124 Responses 124 Should credit insurers be exempted? 125 Should companies within the same group be exempted? 125 Other exempted categories suggested 126 Named organisations 126 Collecting debts as a business or otherwise 128 Criteria for licensing 128 Responses 129 Residence status requirement 129 Other requirements 130 Appeal mechanism 130 Statutory powers and duties 132 iv Responses 132 Code of practice 134 Responses 134 Guideline of the Australian Competition and Consumer 134 Commission Consumer credit data 139 Responses 139 Revision to the Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data – 2002 140 Credit application data 140 File activity data 140 Consumer credit scoring 141 Lenders’ participation in the sharing of information 141 Way forward 142 Efficiency of the judicial process 143 Responses 143 Interim Report and Consultative Paper on Civil Justice 143 Reform December 2001 Self-regulation 144 Responses 144 Conclusion 145 11. Summary of recommendations 146 Annex 1 – Responses to Consultation Paper on 151 Regulation of Debt Collection Practices Annex 2 – ACCC’ s Guidelines 153 v Preface __________ Terms of reference 1. On 30 July 1998, the Chief Justice and the Secretary for Justice referred the following matter to the Law Reform Commission: “To consider the adequacy of the existing law governing the way in which creditors, debt collection agencies and debt collectors collect debts in Hong Kong without recourse to the court system, and to recommend such changes in the law as may be thought appropriate.” 2. The Law Reform Commission has been greatly assisted by the findings of the Sub-committee and wish to record here our appreciation of the hard work devoted to this reference by members of the Sub-committee. The Sub-committee 3. The Sub-committee on Regulation of Debt Collection Practices was appointed in November 1998 to consider and advise on the present state of the law and to make proposals for reform. The sub-committee members are: The Hon Mr Justice Sakhrani Judge of the High Court (Chairman since September 2000) Mr Robert G Kotewall, SBS, SC Senior Counsel (Vice-Chairman) Mr Charles D Booth Associate Professor Department of Professional Legal Education University of Hong Kong Mr John R Brewer formerly Secretary & Chief Financial Officer First Ecommerce Asia Limited Ms Carman Y F Chiu Senior Manager (Banking Development) (member until March 2000 Hong Kong Monetary Authority and then since October 2001) 1 Mr Junius K Y Ho Council Member The Law Society of Hong Kong Ms Rita S C Ho Assistant Principal Solicitor Companies Registry Mr Robin McLeish Barrister, Temple Chambers formerly Deputy Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data Mrs Rita L Y Tong Manager, Customer Assistance Standard Chartered Bank Mr Tsang Wai-hung Chief Superintendent (Organized Crime & (member since October 2001) Triad Bureau) Hong Kong Police Force Miss Eliza K C Yau Principal Assistant Secretary (member since August 1999) Security Bureau Ms Cathy Wan Senior Government Counsel (Secretary) Law Reform Commission 4. Former members who contributed to the work of the Sub- committee are: Hon Mr Justice Litton, GBM Non-permanent Judge of the (Chairman until September Court of Final Appeal 2000) Mr Philip K Y Chan (then) Principal Assistant Secretary (member until August 1999) Security Bureau Mr Thomas Chan Wai-ki Chief Superintendent (member until October 2001) Hong Kong Police Force Miss Margaret Mary Y F Leong Senior Manager (member from March 2000 Hong Kong Monetary Authority until October 2001) 5. The reference has been considered by the Sub-committee and the Law Reform Commission over the course of 18 formal meetings. Views have also been exchanged by circulation of correspondence and informal meetings. 6. On 28 July 2000, in order to seek views and comments from the community, the Sub-committee issued a Consultation Paper setting out its initial proposals on the reference. Over 60 written responses were received, many of these were substantive with practical comments on the issues 2 addressed in the Consultation Paper.
Recommended publications
  • URBAN PLANNING and ENVIRONMENTAL LAW QUARTERLYQUARTERLY (Published Since May 1992)
    An Association of Asian Commercial Law Firms FRED KAN & CO. Solicitors & Notaries URBAN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW QUARTERLYQUARTERLY (Published since May 1992) We are confronted increasingly by examples of the government’s reluctance to fairly and resolutely enforce our planning and environment-protection laws: from slow or no reactions to illegal roads in country parks and bending planning laws to accommodate developers’ ambitions, to almost a state of denial of worsening air and water pollution. However, a long-standing record of inadequate penalties for environmental offences also contributes to this sorry state of affairs. The Editors ● WDO CONTENTS WEAK PENALTIES 1st offence - $200,000 and 6 months imprisonment UNDERMINE ENFORCEMENT 2nd (etc) offence - $500,000 and imprisonment for 6 months OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS ● WPCO FEATURE: Page We often hear and read criticism of the apparent lack of 1st offence - $200,000 and 6 months imprisonment political will in Hong Kong to monitor and resolutely 2nd (etc.) offence - $400,000 (plus $10,000 per day for WEAK PENALTIES UNDERMINE enforce our environment-protection and planning laws. continuing offence) and 6 months imprisonment Over the years, the UPELQ has from time to time made ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL the same criticism of Hong Kong’s environmental agencies, ● APCO LAWS ................................................................1 mainly in the context of anti-pollution laws and laws Section 10(7)(a) (failure to comply with abatement designed to protect our natural environment. notice) – fine of $500,000 (plus $100,000 per day for continuing TOWN PLANNING ...........................................3 We make no apology for doing so again. Specifically, in offence) and imprisonment for 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Administration's Letter Dated 12 May 2021
    Enclosure A Press Statement Senior Judicial Appointment: Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal ************************************************************** The Chief Executive, Mrs Carrie Lam, has accepted the recommendation of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission (JORC) on the appointment of the Honourable Mr Justice Johnson LAM Man-hon (Mr Justice Lam), Vice-President and Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal of the High Court, as a permanent judge of the Court of Final Appeal. Subject to the endorsement of the Legislative Council, the Chief Executive will make the appointment under Article 88 of the Basic Law. Mrs Lam said, “I am pleased to accept the JORC’s recommendation on the appointment of Mr Justice Lam as a permanent judge of the Court of Final Appeal. Mr Justice Lam is an all-rounded appellate Judge who possesses rich experience and expertise in handling civil cases of all types, including in particular public law and constitutional law cases. His judgments are well-reasoned and balanced. They are regularly reported in the law reports and cited in arguments and judgments. He also has extensive experience in steering reforms to improve on the administration of justice. He will be a great asset to the Court of Final Appeal.” Article 90 of the Basic Law provides that the Chief Executive shall obtain the endorsement of the Legislative Council on the appointment of the judges of the Court of Final Appeal. The Government will seek the endorsement of the Legislative Council of the recommended appointment in due course. The curriculum vitae of Mr Justice Lam is at Annex.
    [Show full text]
  • ASAA Abstract Booklet
    ASAA 2020 Abstract Book 23rd Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia (ASAA) The University of Melbourne Contents Pages ● Address from the Conference Convenor 3 ● 2020 ASAA Organising Committee 4 ● Disciplinary Champions 4-6 ● Conference Organisers 6 ● Conference Sponsors and Supporters 7 ● Conference Program 8-18 ● Sub-Regional Keynote Abstracts 19-21 ● Roundtable Abstracts 22-25 ● Speaker Abstracts ○ Tuesday 7th July ▪ Panel Session 1.1 26-60 ▪ Panel Session 1.2 61-94 ▪ Panel Session 1.3 95-129 ○ Wednesday 8th July ▪ Panel Session 2.1 130-165 ▪ Panel Session 2.2 166-198 ▪ Panel Session 2.3 199-230 ○ Thursday 9th July ▪ Panel Session 3.1 231-264 ▪ Panel Session 3.2 265-296 ▪ Panel Session 3.3 297-322 ● Author Index 323-332 Page 2 23rd Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia Abstract Book Address from the Conference Convenor Dear Colleagues, At the time that we made the necessary decision to cancel the ASAA 2020 conference our digital program was already available online. Following requests from several younger conference participants who were looking forward to presenting at their first international conference and networking with established colleagues in their field, we have prepared this book of abstracts together with the program. We hope that you, our intended ASAA 2020 delegates, will use this document as a way to discover the breadth of research being undertaken and reach out to other scholars. Several of you have kindly recognised how much work went into preparing the program for our 600 participants. We think this is a nice way to at least share the program in an accessible format and to allow you all to see the exciting breadth of research on Asia going on in Australia and in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Thanks for Your Support
    Thanks for Your Support The Academy of Law acknowledges the generous contribution of everyone who was involved in the presentation of the training programme for the period between 2 September 2008 and 31 December 2009. The Academy extends a special note of thanks to the following judges, solicitors, barristers, foreign lawyers and prominent members of society who volunteered their time to make the programme such a success: A y Registrar Queeny Au-Yeung, High Court B y Peter Barnes, Partner, Barnes & Daly y Philip Beh, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong y Geoffrey Booth, Partner, Haldanes y Judge Kevin Browne, Judge of the District Court y John Budge, Partner, Wilkinson & Grist y Patrick Burke, Partner, Burke & Co C y Patrick Cavanagh, Director of Commercial Programmes, Dispute Resolution Centre, Bond University y His Honour Judge Bruno Chan, Family Court y Mary Chan, Consultant, Ho & Ip y Her Honour Judge Mimmie Chan, District Court y Stephen Chan, Partner, BDO Limited y Felix W.H. Chan, Associate Professor, Associate Dean, Department of Professional Legal Education, The University of Hong Kong y Wai-sum Chan, Professor, Department of Finance, Chinese University of Hong Kong y Julia Charlton, Partner, Charltons y Allen Che, Partner, Wong, Hui, & Co y Cheng Wui Kei Roy, Director, ISE Consultants Limited y Amelia Cheung, Partner, Amelia Cheung & Co y David Cheung, Partner, Yuen K H & David Cheung y Melissa Chim, Solicitor, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert y Choi Wai Fan, RBS Coutts Bank Ltd y Chow Wing Hang,
    [Show full text]
  • Cb(2)2183/02-03(01)
    LC Paper No. CB(2)2183/02-03(01) Paper for the Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services Resource Centre for Unrepresented Litigants Purpose This paper informs Members of the progress of the setting up of the Resource Centre for Unrepresented Litigants (“Resource Centre”) by the Judiciary. Background 2. The instances of litigants appearing in civil proceedings in the High Court and the District Court without legal representation have increased considerably in recent years. They represent a significant demand on judicial time and resources. The increasing number of unrepresented litigants poses challenges for the courts. 3. As part of the Judiciary’s response to these challenges, the Chief Justice announced in his address at the opening of the Legal Year 2002 that he had decided to establish a resource centre for unrepresented litigants in civil proceedings in the High Court and the District Court. The purpose is to provide facilities to enable unrepresented litigants to deal with the court rules and procedures in the conduct of their cases. Steering Committee on Resource Centre for Unrepresented Litigants 4. To further this objective, the Chief Justice appointed the Steering Committee on Resource Centre for Unrepresented Litigants (“Steering Committee”) in February 2002, with the following terms of reference - (a) To advise on the establishment and operation of the resource centre for unrepresented litigants in civil proceedings in the High Court and the District Court; and (b) To explore with the legal profession, interested non- governmental organizations (“NGOs”) and other interested - 2 - bodies opportunities for them to provide assistance at or through the resource centre to unrepresented litigants in civil proceedings in the High Court and the District Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Going to Court
    GOING TO COURT A DISCUSSION PAPER ON CIVIL JUSTICE IN VICTORIA PETER A SALLMANN, CROWN COUNSEL AND RICHARD T WRIGHT, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, CIVIL JUSTICE REVIEW PROJECT APRIL, 2000 How to make comments and submissions We would encourage comments and submissions on the discussion paper. They can be sent to the Department of Justice at the address below: Civil Justice Review Project GPO Box 4356QQ Melbourne, Victoria, 3001 Comments and submissions can also be sent by e-mail to: [email protected] The discussion can be read and downloaded from the Department of Justice homepage www.justice.vic.gov.au Adobe Acrobat® Reader will be required. Peter Sallmann LLB (Melbourne), M.S.A.J. (The American University), M.Phil (Cambridge) is Victorian Crown Counsel, formerly Director of the Civil Justice Review Project, Executive Director of the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration and a Commissioner of the Law Reform Commission of Victoria. Peter is admitted to practise as a Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria. He has held a number of academic posts in law and criminology, and served on a variety of Boards and Inquiries, including the Premier’s Drug Advisory Council (the Penington Inquiry) and has published widely on judicial administration and related topics. Richard Wright B.Ec (Hons) (La Trobe) LLB (Melbourne) is Associate Director of the Civil Justice Review Project, formerly Chairman of the Residential Tenancies Tribunals and Senior Referee of the Small Claims Tribunal, Executive Director of the Law Reform Commission of Victoria, Management Consultant in the public and private sectors and has held policy advisory positions in the Australian Tariff Board, Prices Justification Tribunal and the federal Departments of Industrial Relations and Prime Minister and Cabinet.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Preliminary Materials Formatted (20191202)
    Hong Kong Journal of Legal Studies – Volume 13 (2019) HONG KONG JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Volume 13 Selected and edited by Christina Fong Wilson Lui Lucien van Romburg Yukiko Kobayashi Lui Hermia Wong Phoebe Woo Lillie Lam Ruvini Katugaha Vanessa Leigh Jamie Choy Xiaobin Huo Amanada Liu Brian Fung Jacky Tam Joshua Ng Clement Cheung Alvin Yu June Ho Lok Man Hung Florence Li Joyce Lui Marco Ngan Xavier Huang Dennis Lui Alex Chan Chloe Chan Wesley Ding 2019 Hong Kong Journal of Legal Studies Address: Room 403, Cheng Yu Tung Tower, Centennial Campus, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Email: [email protected] Website: www.law.hku.hk/hkjls/ This publication may be cited as (2019) 13 HKJLS Editorial arrangement © Hong Kong Journal of Legal Studies 2019 Individual articles © the several contributors 2019 Cover design © Thomas Chung 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the author(s) concerned and the Hong Kong Journal of Legal Studies, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organisation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Editorial Board of the Hong Kong Journal of Studies, at the address above. CONTENTS Foreword i The Hon Mr Justice Cheung Permanent Judge, Court of Final Appeal Preface iii 1 ‘European Jurisprudence’ on 1 Comparative Advertising Not Followed in Hong Kong
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Book Catalogue
    2021 Hong Kong July Book Catalogue ENCYCLOPAEDIC WORKS & LOOSELEAF SERVICES Law. In Sync. Title Index Encyclopaedic Works • Atkin's Court Forms Hong Kong • Halsbury's Laws of Hong Kong - Second Edition • The Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong • The Hong Kong Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents Law Reports • Hong Kong Cases • Hong Kong Conveyancing and Property Reports • Hong Kong Family Law Reports • Hong Kong Public Law Reports Looseleafs • Banking Law: Hong Kong SAR and People's Republic of China • Butterworths Hong Kong Personal Injury Service • Criminal Evidence in Hong Kong • Criminal Procedure: Trial on Indictment • Emden's Construction Law Hong Kong • Encyclopaedia of Hong Kong Taxation • Hong Kong Civil Court Practice • Hong Kong Company Law: Legislation and Commentary • Hong Kong Conveyancing • Hong Kong Corporate Law • Hong Kong Employment Law Manual • Hong Kong Employment Ordinance: An Annotated Guide • Hotten and Ho on Family and Divorce Law in Hong Kong • Intellectual Property in Hong Kong • Securities Law: Hong Kong SAR and People's Republic of China • The Professional Conduct of Lawyers in Hong Kong LexisNexis® Hong Kong - Encyclopaedic Works & Looseleaf Services 2021 Atkin's Court Forms Hong Kong ISBN: Update frequency: 9789628105472 6 issues a year Format: Looseleaf set (10 binders); Lexis Advance® Hong Kong (Online) Scan me for details https://www.lexisnexis.com.hk/ACFHK An unrivalled collection of the main procedural documents required in every civil proceeding before the courts in Hong Kong. Your guide through all the essential stages of proceedings, from pre-action to post-judgment, providing a structured and reliable guide to help you plead with confidence. This essential practical encyclopaedia is the authoritative local version Titles Covered: of the UK encyclopaedic work, fully adapted to the needs of the Hong Kong practitioner.
    [Show full text]
  • JORC Report 2018
    JORC Report 2018 The work of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission (“JORC”) is set out in two separate reports. First, a report entitled “Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission” is published to provide an overall account of the JORC, identifying the different levels of court within its responsibility. Secondly, an annual report is published to report on the work of the JORC during the year. This JORC Report 2018 provides an account of the work of the JORC during 2018. In an effort to contribute to the protection of the environment, we will only upload both Reports on our Website. Geoffrey Ma Chief Justice Chairman of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission Membership of JORC 1. In 2018, the Chief Executive re-appointed a member of JORC and appointed five new members to JORC for a term of up to two years until 30 June 2020. The membership in 2018 is listed below – Ex officio chairman and member The Honourable Chief Justice Geoffrey MA Tao-li, GBM (Chairman) The Honourable Ms. Teresa CHENG Yeuk-wah, GBS, SC, JP (Secretary for Justice) Judges The Honourable Mr. Justice Robert TANG Ching, GBM, SBS (from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2016) (from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2018) The Honourable Mr. Justice Andrew CHEUNG Kui-nung (from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2014) (from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2016) (from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2018) (from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2020) The Honourable Madam Justice Carlye CHU Fun-ling (from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2020) Barrister and solicitor Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening of the Legal Yew; 2002
    Opening of the legal Yew; 2002 Chapter In the Eyes of_ the Law he rule of law has provided Hong Kong with a level playing field for Tfree and fair competition, and hence helped maintain the integrity of a genuine market economy. It is also the firm foundation for the freedoms that Hong Kong enjoys. The security and stability that our system of laws has provided have made Hong Kong a major attraction for investments and arguably the most cosmopolitan city in the region. Hong Kong's legal system is essentially a British tradition of rigour that has taken root in a Chinese culture. The credit for taking relative comfort in such a potentially difficult combination should go to the handful of earlier local members of the profession. Among them, the University's graduates, often receiving their legal training overseas, but benefiting from their liberal education at the University, have played an important part. The cultural integration in the legal system has given Hong Kong's legal profession the privileged position of being able to participate in the reconstruction of China's legal system out of the ruins of the Cultural Revolution, and is crucial to Hong Kong playing a bridging role between those inside and outside China. The first generation of locally educated lawyers emerged in 1972. as the first law graduates of the University. Since then, the University's law graduates have played pivotal roles in Hong Kong's participation in the drafting of the Basic Law which is the mini-constitution for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
    [Show full text]
  • JORC Report 2019
    JORC Report 2019 The work of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission (“JORC”) is set out in two separate reports. First, a report entitled “Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission” is published to provide an overall account of the JORC, identifying the different levels of court within its responsibility. Secondly, an annual report is published to report on the work of the JORC during the year. This JORC Report 2019 provides an account of the work of the JORC during 2019. In an effort to contribute to the protection of the environment, we will only upload both Reports on our Website. Geoffrey Ma Chief Justice Chairman of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission Membership of JORC 1. In 2019, the Chief Executive re-appointed a member of JORC and appointed a new member to JORC for a term of up to two years until 30 June 2021. The membership in 2019 is listed below – Ex officio chairman and member The Honourable Chief Justice Geoffrey MA Tao-li, GBM (Chairman) The Honourable Ms. Teresa CHENG Yeuk-wah, GBS, SC, JP (Secretary for Justice) Judges The Honourable Mr. Justice Andrew CHEUNG Kui-nung (from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2014) (from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2016) (from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2018) (from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2020) The Honourable Madam Justice Carlye CHU Fun-ling (from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2020) Barrister and solicitor Mr. Philip John DYKES, SC (barrister) (from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2020) Mr. Stephen HUNG Wan-shun (solicitor) (from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2017) (from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2019) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Index Page Replies to Initial Written Questions Raised by Finance
    Index Page Replies to initial written questions raised by Finance Committee Members in examining the Estimates of Expenditure 2021-22 Controlling Officer : Judiciary Administrator Session No. : 2 Consolidated e-file name : JA-1-e1.docx Reply Serial Question Name of Member Head Programme No. Serial No. JA001 0749 CHENG Chung-tai 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Various Statutory Functions JA002 0750 CHENG Chung-tai 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Various Statutory Functions JA003 0781 CHENG Chung-tai 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Various Statutory Functions JA004 2852 CHENG Chung-tai 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Various Statutory Functions JA005 1625 CHOW Ho-ding, 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Holden Various Statutory Functions JA006 1626 CHOW Ho-ding, 80 (2) Support Services for Holden Courts’ Operation JA007 1627 CHOW Ho-ding, 80 (2) Support Services for Holden Courts’ Operation JA008 1628 CHOW Ho-ding, 80 - Holden JA009 1629 CHOW Ho-ding, 80 - Holden JA010 1525 HO Kwan-yiu, 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Junius Various Statutory Functions JA011 1526 HO Kwan-yiu, 80 (2) Support Services for Junius Courts’ Operation JA012 1778 LAU Ip-keung, 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Kenneth Various Statutory Functions (2) Support Services for Courts’ Operation JA013 1847 LEE Wai-king, 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Starry Various Statutory Functions JA014 2457 LEUNG Mei-fun, 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Priscilla Various Statutory Functions JA015 2458 LEUNG Mei-fun, 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Priscilla Various Statutory Functions JA016 2486 LEUNG Mei-fun, 80 (2) Support Services for Priscilla Courts’ Operation JA017 2521 LEUNG Mei-fun, 80 (1) Courts, Tribunals and Priscilla Various Statutory Functions JA018 3010 LEUNG Mei-fun, 80 (2) Support Services for Priscilla Courts’ Operation Reply Serial Question Name of Member Head Programme No.
    [Show full text]