DOCSLIB.ORG

Going to Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Going to Court GOING TO COURT A DISCUSSION PAPER ON CIVIL JUSTICE IN VICTORIA PETER A SALLMANN, CROWN COUNSEL AND RICHARD T WRIGHT, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, CIVIL JUSTICE REVIEW PROJECT APRIL, 2000 How to make comments and submissions We would encourage comments and submissions on the discussion paper. They can be sent to the Department of Justice at the address below: Civil Justice Review Project GPO Box 4356QQ Melbourne, Victoria, 3001 Comments and submissions can also be sent by e-mail to: [email protected] The discussion can be read and downloaded from the Department of Justice homepage www.justice.vic.gov.au Adobe Acrobat® Reader will be required. Peter Sallmann LLB (Melbourne), M.S.A.J. (The American University), M.Phil (Cambridge) is Victorian Crown Counsel, formerly Director of the Civil Justice Review Project, Executive Director of the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration and a Commissioner of the Law Reform Commission of Victoria. Peter is admitted to practise as a Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria. He has held a number of academic posts in law and criminology, and served on a variety of Boards and Inquiries, including the Premier’s Drug Advisory Council (the Penington Inquiry) and has published widely on judicial administration and related topics. Richard Wright B.Ec (Hons) (La Trobe) LLB (Melbourne) is Associate Director of the Civil Justice Review Project, formerly Chairman of the Residential Tenancies Tribunals and Senior Referee of the Small Claims Tribunal, Executive Director of the Law Reform Commission of Victoria, Management Consultant in the public and private sectors and has held policy advisory positions in the Australian Tariff Board, Prices Justification Tribunal and the federal Departments of Industrial Relations and Prime Minister and Cabinet. Richard is admitted to practise in the Supreme Court of Victoria and the High Court of Australia. CONTENTS CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...........................................................................................1 SUMMARY...................................................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................13 BACKGROUND TO THE REVIEW.............................................................................................13 CIVIL JUSTICE IN PERSPECTIVE .............................................................................................14 CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE .................................................................................................16 PURPOSE OF THE PAPER...........................................................................................................18 STRUCTURE AND CONTENT OF THE PAPER........................................................................18 2. CIVIL JUSTICE IN VICTORIA.......................................................................20 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................20 CHANGE IN THE SYSTEM .........................................................................................................21 SUPPORT FOR CHANGE.............................................................................................................23 THE URGENCY OF FURTHER CHANGE..................................................................................24 A CLEAR SENSE OF DIRECTION..............................................................................................27 A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION..................................................................................................31 3. STRUCTURE, JURISDICTION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE COURTS. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................35 STRUCTURE OF THE COURTS..................................................................................................35 QUESTIONS OF JURISDICTION ................................................................................................40 ISSUES OF GOVERNANCE.........................................................................................................44 4. DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND THE COURTS .............................................55 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................55 GROWTH OF ADR .......................................................................................................................55 CONSULTATIONS ON ADR .......................................................................................................57 DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY IN VICTORIA......................................................................58 EXPANDING THE RANGE OF OPTIONS..................................................................................59 OPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................60 A MATTER FOR THE COURTS..................................................................................................64 5. CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT.........................................................................66 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................66 PARADIGM SHIFT .......................................................................................................................67 VICTORIAN DEVELOPMENTS..................................................................................................68 IMPORTANCE OF LOCAL LEGAL CULTURE.........................................................................69 NECESSARY INGREDIENTS......................................................................................................70 VARIATION IN APPROACHES ..................................................................................................72 BEST PRACTICE ..........................................................................................................................73 COMMENTS ON CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT IN VICTORIA..............................................74 A DIFFERENT APPROACH.........................................................................................................78 THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT ....................................................................................................83 i CONTENTS 6. LITIGATION PROCEDURE AND PRACTICE ............................................85 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................85 A LITIGATION SYSTEM ROUND TABLE ................................................................................87 LITIGATION PROTOCOLS .........................................................................................................88 A QUIET REVOLUTION..............................................................................................................89 COURTS AS PROVIDERS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION INFORMATION AND ADVICE....91 PRE-ISSUE MEDIATION .............................................................................................................93 LITIGATION NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES..........................................................................94 PLEADINGS ..................................................................................................................................96 DISCOVERY................................................................................................................................105 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ...........................................................................................................113 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION................................................................................121 7. TRIAL MANAGEMENT.................................................................................132 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................132 TRIAL MANAGEMENT AS AN EVOLVING PHENOMENON..............................................133 TRIAL CONTROL.......................................................................................................................134 TRIAL MANAGEMENT EDUCATION.....................................................................................138 EXPERT EVIDENCE ..................................................................................................................138 TRIAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES................................................................................145 WITNESS STATEMENTS ..........................................................................................................147 ALTERNATIVES TO A FULL TRIAL.......................................................................................151 THE CONCEPT OF A CONTINUOUS TRIAL ..........................................................................152 8. THE COST OF LITIGATION ........................................................................154 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................154 COMMONWEALTH ACCESS TO JUSTICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ..............................158 COMMONWEALTH
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report FY17-18
    2017/18 The Rhodes Trust Second Century Annual Report 2017/18 Trustees 2017/18 Sir John Hood KNZM, Chairman Professor Margaret Professor Ngaire Woods CBE (New Zealand & Worcester 1976) MacMillan CH, CC (New Zealand & Balliol 1987) Andrew Banks Dr Tariro Makadzange John Wylie AM (Florida & St Edmund Hall 1976) (Zimbabwe & Balliol 1999) (Queensland & Balliol 1983) Dominic Barton Michael McCaffery (British Columbia & Brasenose 1984) (Pennsylvania & Merton 1975) New Trustees 2018 Professor Sir John Bell GBE John McCall MacBain O.C. Robert Sternfels (Alberta & Magdalen 1975) (Québec & Wadham 1980) (California & Worcester 1992) Professor Elleke Boehmer Nicholas Oppenheimer Katherine O’Regan (South Africa-at-Large and St John’s 1985) Professor Dame Carol Robinson DBE Dame Helen Ghosh DCB Trustee Emeritus Dilip Shangvhi Donald J. Gogel Julian Ogilvie Thompson (New Jersey & Balliol 1971) Peter Stamos (Diocesan College, Rondebosch (California & Worcester 1981) & Worcester 1953) Glen James Judge Karen Stevenson (Maryland/DC & Magdalen 1979) Development Committee Andrew Banks, Chairman Bruns Grayson The Hon. Thomas McMillen (Florida & St Edmund Hall 1976) (California & University 1974) (Maryland & University 1974) Nicholas Allard Patrick Haden Timothy Orton (New York & Merton 1974) (California & Worcester 1975) (Australia-at-Large & Magdalen 1986) Dominic Barton Sir John Hood KNZM Lief Rosenblatt (British Columbia & Brasenose 1984) (New Zealand & Worcester 1976) (Massachusetts & Magdalen 1974) Shona L. Brown Sean Mahoney Arthur Scace, CM, QC, LLD (Ontario & New College 1987) (Illinois & New College 1984) (Ontario & Corpus Christi 1961) Gerald J. Cardinale Jacko Maree The Hon. Malcolm Turnbull MP (Pennsylvania & Christ Church 1989) (St Andrews College, Grahamstown (New South Wales & Brasenose 1978) & Pembroke 1978) Sir Roderick Eddington Michele Warman (Western Australia & Lincoln 1974) Michael McCaffery (New York & Magdalen 1982) (Pennsylvania & Merton 1975) Michael Fitzpatrick Charles Conn (Western Australia & St Johns 1975) John McCall MacBain O.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Judges' Annual Report
    Supreme Court of Victoria 2002–04 Annual Report SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA 2002–04 JUDGES’ ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR Court Profile 1 To His Excellency Year at a Glance 2 The Honourable John Landy, AC, MBE Report of the Chief Justice 3 Governor of the State of Victoria and its Chief Executive Officer’s Review 7 Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia Court of Appeal 10 Dear Governor Trial Division: Civil 13 We, the Judges of the Supreme Court of Victoria have the honour to present our Annual Report Trial Division: Commercial and Equity 18 pursuant to the provisions of the Supreme Court Act 1986 with respect to the financial years of Trial Division: Common Law 22 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003 and 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004, including a transitional 18-month Trial Division: Criminal 24 Judges’ Report, reflecting the change in reporting period from calendar year to financial year. Masters 26 Funds in Court 29 Court Governance 31 Yours sincerely Judicial Organisational Chart 33 Judicial Administration 34 Court Management 36 Service Delivery 37 The Victorian Jury System 40 Marilyn L Warren The Court’s People 42 Chief Justice of Victoria Community Access 43 10 May 2005 Finance Report 2002–03 and 2003–04 45 Senior Master’s Special Purpose Financial Report for the John Winneke, P P D Cummins, J D J Habersberger, J Year Ended 30 June 2003 50 W F Ormiston, J A T H Smith, J R S Osborn, J Senior Master’s Special Purpose Stephen Charles, J A David Ashley, J J A Dodds-Streeton, J Financial Report for the F H Callaway, J A John
    [Show full text]
  • Making Law Accessible Contents
    VICTORIA LAW FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 2006 Making Law Accessible Contents 3 OUR PROGRAM, OUR BOARD, OUR STAFF Foundation President, The Hon Chief Justice Marilyn Warren AC Executive Director, Professor Kathy Laster 8 GRANTS Small Grants 2005–06: From little things big things grow Project Grants 2005–06: Transforming ideas into solutions 14 ACCESS TO JUSTICE Law Week 2006: Engaging the community Law@Your Library: Information when and where you need it Russell Street Justice Museum: Bringing law to life 18 PUBLICATIONS Supporting our Grants Program But for the Foundation Coordinating legal sector publishing 20 SUPPORT FOR BEST PRACTICE Encouraging excellence Training and Capacity Building Coordination across the Legal Sector 25 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Doing more with less GRANTS ACCESS TO JUSTICE G A S P SUPPORT FOR BEST PRACTICE PUBLICATIONS 2 Our Program Victoria Law Foundation Since its creation in 1967, the Foundation The Foundation fi lls GAPS in has established itself as a model existing services through four operates under its own Act community benefi t organisation with the of Parliament with a broad independence and organisational fl exibility key areas of activity: mandate to: necessary to meet the needs of a changing community. Its primary vision is to raise GRANTS: – promote and undertake community understanding of, and access We provide funding for, as well to, a better and more responsive justice community legal education system. as brokering, innovative law and and training, justice projects. To best achieve this, the Foundation – publish and communicate operates in a dynamic and holistic way, so that the results of its work are far ACCESS TO JUSTICE: legal information and ideas, greater than the sum of its resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    THE FOUNDATION OF THE MONASH LAW SCHOOL PETER BALMFORD* INTRODUCTION From 1853 to 1878, an Englishman named John Hughes Clayton practised as a solicitor in the City of Melbourne.' At the end of the working day, he was usually driven home by his coachman: a journey of about twelve miles to his property in a district known as "Old Dam~er".~In the course of time, the north-south road running past his property came to be called "Clayton's Road": the name was ultimately shortened to Clayton Road and from it derived the present name of the di~trict.~ Clayton had become a suburb of Melbourne long before 1958, when Mon- ash University was established by legislation of the Victorian Parliament.4 Nevertheless, the Interim Council of the new University was able to find there 250 acres of largely vacant land which it chose as the site on which to build.5 Sir John Monash (1865-1931), after whom the University was named, is celebrated as a soldier, as an engineer and as an administrator. He was a graduate of the University of Melbourne in Arts, Engineering and Law. He never practised as a barrister or solicitor, although, in the 1890s and the early years of the twentieth century, he appeared as an advocate in arbitrations on engineering disputes and frequently gave evidence as an expert witness in engineering and patent mattem6 This article gives an account of the foundation of the law school at Monash University, Clayton, in celebration of the twenty-five years of teaching which have now been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of Victoria
    ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL Annual Report Supreme Court a SUPREME COURTSUPREME OF VICTORIA 2016-17 of Victoria SUPREME COURTSUPREME OF VICTORIA ANNUAL REPORT 2016-17ANNUAL Supreme Court Annual Report of Victoria 2016-17 Letter to the Governor September 2017 To Her Excellency Linda Dessau AC, Governor of the state of Victoria and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. Dear Governor, We, the judges of the Supreme Court of Victoria, have the honour of presenting our Annual Report pursuant to the provisions of the Supreme Court Act 1986 with respect to the financial year 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017. Yours sincerely, Marilyn L Warren AC The Honourable Chief Justice Supreme Court of Victoria Published by the Supreme Court of Victoria Melbourne, Victoria, Australia September 2017 © Supreme Court of Victoria ISSN 1839-6062 Authorised by the Supreme Court of Victoria. This report is also published on the Court’s website: www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au Enquiries Supreme Court of Victoria 210 William Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Tel: 03 9603 6111 Email: [email protected] Annual Report Supreme Court 1 2016-17 of Victoria Contents Chief Justice foreword 2 Court Administration 49 Discrete administrative functions 55 Chief Executive Officer foreword 4 Appendices 61 Financial report 62 At a glance 5 Judicial officers of the Supreme Court of Victoria 63 About the Supreme Court of Victoria 6 2016-17 The work of the Court 7 Judicial activity 65 Contacts and locations 83 The year in review 13 Significant events 14 Work of the Supreme Court 18 The Court of Appeal 19 Trial Division – Commercial Court 23 Trial Division – Common Law 30 Trial Division – Criminal 40 Trial Division – Judicial Mediation 45 Trial Division – Costs Court 45 2 Supreme Court Annual Report of Victoria 2016-17 Chief Justice foreword It is a pleasure to present the Annual Report of the Supreme Court of Victoria for 2016-17.
    [Show full text]
  • From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: a Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants ISSN 1328-7478
    Department of the Parliamentary Library INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES •~J..>t~)~.J&~l<~t~& Research Paper No. 25 1998-99 From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: A Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants ISSN 1328-7478 © Copyright Commonwealth ofAustralia 1999 Except to the exteot of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department ofthe Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament in the course oftheir official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribntion to Senators and Members ofthe Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced,the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian govermnent document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staffbut not with members ofthe public. , ,. Published by the Department ofthe Parliamentary Library, 1999 INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES , Research Paper No. 25 1998-99 From Constitutional Convention to Republic Referendum: A Guide to the Processes, the Issues and the Participants Professor John Warhurst Consultant, Politics and Public Administration Group , 29 June 1999 Acknowledgments This is to acknowledge the considerable help that I was given in producing this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • URBAN PLANNING and ENVIRONMENTAL LAW QUARTERLYQUARTERLY (Published Since May 1992)
    An Association of Asian Commercial Law Firms FRED KAN & CO. Solicitors & Notaries URBAN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW QUARTERLYQUARTERLY (Published since May 1992) We are confronted increasingly by examples of the government’s reluctance to fairly and resolutely enforce our planning and environment-protection laws: from slow or no reactions to illegal roads in country parks and bending planning laws to accommodate developers’ ambitions, to almost a state of denial of worsening air and water pollution. However, a long-standing record of inadequate penalties for environmental offences also contributes to this sorry state of affairs. The Editors ● WDO CONTENTS WEAK PENALTIES 1st offence - $200,000 and 6 months imprisonment UNDERMINE ENFORCEMENT 2nd (etc) offence - $500,000 and imprisonment for 6 months OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS ● WPCO FEATURE: Page We often hear and read criticism of the apparent lack of 1st offence - $200,000 and 6 months imprisonment political will in Hong Kong to monitor and resolutely 2nd (etc.) offence - $400,000 (plus $10,000 per day for WEAK PENALTIES UNDERMINE enforce our environment-protection and planning laws. continuing offence) and 6 months imprisonment Over the years, the UPELQ has from time to time made ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL the same criticism of Hong Kong’s environmental agencies, ● APCO LAWS ................................................................1 mainly in the context of anti-pollution laws and laws Section 10(7)(a) (failure to comply with abatement designed to protect our natural environment. notice) – fine of $500,000 (plus $100,000 per day for continuing TOWN PLANNING ...........................................3 We make no apology for doing so again. Specifically, in offence) and imprisonment for 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. Linda Dessau AC Government House Melbourne Victoria 3004 Australia
    GOVERNOR OF VICTORIA A MESSAGE FROM HER EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR OF VICTORIA THE HON LINDA DESSAU AC The start to 2020 has certainly been a difficultone, with the bushfiresthat caused so much destruction in parts of our State, and now COVID-19. Our thoughts are with those in areas still grappling with rebuilding and recovery from the fires. And, indeed, with everyone, as we all now try to cope with this health challenge and its far-reachingeffects. We know that in recent months, as in the past, Victorians have demonstrated their resilience and their generosity in response to the bushfirecrisis. Now, more than ever, we need to pull together, to follow the advice and rules set by the experts, to be calm and clear-headed and to be mindful of each other's safety and needs. As our opportunities for workplace and social contact diminish, each one of us will feel the effectsin different ways. To greater or lesser extents, we might all feel some sense of dislocation. I encourage you to check on family, neighbours, the elderly, workmates and anyone who might be alone or doing it tough. Physical distance need not mean social isolation. Let's keep working on creative ways to keep in touch with each other. My husband, Tony, joins me in these thoughts and in particular in expressing our gratitude to the many Victorians working on the frontline - not only our medical and emergency workers but all those working to care for the vulnerable, to look after our children, to keep essential services running and to respond to this unfolding situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Administration's Letter Dated 12 May 2021
    Enclosure A Press Statement Senior Judicial Appointment: Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal ************************************************************** The Chief Executive, Mrs Carrie Lam, has accepted the recommendation of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission (JORC) on the appointment of the Honourable Mr Justice Johnson LAM Man-hon (Mr Justice Lam), Vice-President and Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal of the High Court, as a permanent judge of the Court of Final Appeal. Subject to the endorsement of the Legislative Council, the Chief Executive will make the appointment under Article 88 of the Basic Law. Mrs Lam said, “I am pleased to accept the JORC’s recommendation on the appointment of Mr Justice Lam as a permanent judge of the Court of Final Appeal. Mr Justice Lam is an all-rounded appellate Judge who possesses rich experience and expertise in handling civil cases of all types, including in particular public law and constitutional law cases. His judgments are well-reasoned and balanced. They are regularly reported in the law reports and cited in arguments and judgments. He also has extensive experience in steering reforms to improve on the administration of justice. He will be a great asset to the Court of Final Appeal.” Article 90 of the Basic Law provides that the Chief Executive shall obtain the endorsement of the Legislative Council on the appointment of the judges of the Court of Final Appeal. The Government will seek the endorsement of the Legislative Council of the recommended appointment in due course. The curriculum vitae of Mr Justice Lam is at Annex.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Honour Roll of Women
    INSPIRATIONAL WOMEN FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE OF WALKS ALL FROM WOMEN INSPIRATIONAL VICTORIAN HONOUR ROLL OF WOMEN 2018 PAGE I VICTORIAN HONOUR To receive this publication in an accessible format phone 03 9096 1838 ROLL OF WOMEN using the National Relay Service 13 36 77 if required, or email Women’s Leadership [email protected] Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 1 Treasury Place, Melbourne. © State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services March, 2018. Except where otherwise indicated, the images in this publication show models and illustrative settings only, and do not necessarily depict actual services, facilities or recipients of services. This publication may contain images of deceased Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Where the term ‘Aboriginal’ is used it refers to both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Indigenous/Koori/Koorie is retained when it is part of the title of a report, program or quotation. ISSN 2209-1122 (print) ISSN 2209-1130 (online) PAGE II PAGE Information about the Victorian Honour Roll of Women is available at the Women Victoria website https://www.vic.gov.au/women.html Printed by Waratah Group, Melbourne (1801032) VICTORIAN HONOUR ROLL OF WOMEN 2018 2018 WOMEN OF ROLL HONOUR VICTORIAN VICTORIAN HONOUR ROLL OF WOMEN 2018 PAGE 1 VICTORIAN HONOUR ROLL OF WOMEN 2018 PAGE 2 CONTENTS THE 4 THE MINISTER’S FOREWORD 6 THE GOVERNOR’S FOREWORD 9 2O18 VICTORIAN HONOUR ROLL OF WOMEN INDUCTEES 10 HER EXCELLENCY THE HONOURABLE LINDA DESSAU AC 11 DR MARIA DUDYCZ
    [Show full text]
  • 'His Excellency'
    AROUND TOWN No.151 Autumn 2012 ISSN 0159 3285 ISSN ’His Excellency’ The Hon Alex Chernov AC QC Governor of the State of Victoria 1 VICTORIAN BAR NEWS No. 151 Autumn 2012 Editorial 2 The Editors - Victorian Bar News Continues 3 Chairman’s Cupboard - At the Coalface: A Busy and Productive 2012 News and Views 4 From Vilnius to Melbourne: The Extraordinary Journey of The Hon Alex Chernov AC QC 8 How We Lead 11 Clerking System Review 12 Bendigo Law Association Address 4 8 16 Opening of the 2012 Legal Year 19 The New Bar Readers’ Course - One Year On 20 The Bar Exam 20 Globe Trotters 21 The Courtroom Dog 22 An Uncomfortable Discovery: Legal Process Outsourcing 25 Supreme Court Library 26 Ethics Committee Bulletins Around Town 28 The 2011 Bar Dinner 35 The Lineage and Strength of Our Traditions 38 Doyle SC Finally Has Her Say! 42 Farewell to Malkanthi Bowatta (DeSilva) 12 43 The Honourable Justice David Byrne Farewell Dinner 47 A Philanthropic Bar 48 AALS-ABCC Lord Judge Breakfast Editors 49 Vicbar Defeats the Solicitors! Paul Hayes, Richard Attiwill and Sharon Moore 51 Bar Hockey VBN Editorial Committee 52 Real Tennis and the Victorian Bar Paul Hayes, Richard Attiwill and Sharon Moore (Editors), Georgina Costello, Anthony 53 Wigs and Gowns Regatta 2011 Strahan (Deputy Editors), Ben Ihle, Justin Tomlinson, Louise Martin, Maree Norton and Benjamin Jellis Back of the Lift 55 Quarterly Counsel Contributors The Hon Chief Justice Warren AC, The Hon Justice David Ashley, The Hon Justice Geoffrey 56 Silence All Stand Nettle, Federal Magistrate Phillip Burchardt, The Hon John Coldrey QC, The Hon Peter 61 Her Honour Judge Barbara Cotterell Heerey QC, The Hon Neil Brown QC, Jack Fajgenbaum QC, John Digby QC, Julian Burnside 63 Going Up QC, Melanie Sloss SC, Fiona McLeod SC, James Mighell SC, Rachel Doyle SC, Paul Hayes, 63 Gonged! Richard Attiwill, Sharon Moore, Georgia King-Siem, Matt Fisher, Lindy Barrett, Georgina 64 Adjourned Sine Die Costello, Maree Norton, Louise Martin and James Butler.
    [Show full text]
  • ASAA Abstract Booklet
    ASAA 2020 Abstract Book 23rd Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia (ASAA) The University of Melbourne Contents Pages ● Address from the Conference Convenor 3 ● 2020 ASAA Organising Committee 4 ● Disciplinary Champions 4-6 ● Conference Organisers 6 ● Conference Sponsors and Supporters 7 ● Conference Program 8-18 ● Sub-Regional Keynote Abstracts 19-21 ● Roundtable Abstracts 22-25 ● Speaker Abstracts ○ Tuesday 7th July ▪ Panel Session 1.1 26-60 ▪ Panel Session 1.2 61-94 ▪ Panel Session 1.3 95-129 ○ Wednesday 8th July ▪ Panel Session 2.1 130-165 ▪ Panel Session 2.2 166-198 ▪ Panel Session 2.3 199-230 ○ Thursday 9th July ▪ Panel Session 3.1 231-264 ▪ Panel Session 3.2 265-296 ▪ Panel Session 3.3 297-322 ● Author Index 323-332 Page 2 23rd Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia Abstract Book Address from the Conference Convenor Dear Colleagues, At the time that we made the necessary decision to cancel the ASAA 2020 conference our digital program was already available online. Following requests from several younger conference participants who were looking forward to presenting at their first international conference and networking with established colleagues in their field, we have prepared this book of abstracts together with the program. We hope that you, our intended ASAA 2020 delegates, will use this document as a way to discover the breadth of research being undertaken and reach out to other scholars. Several of you have kindly recognised how much work went into preparing the program for our 600 participants. We think this is a nice way to at least share the program in an accessible format and to allow you all to see the exciting breadth of research on Asia going on in Australia and in the region.
    [Show full text]