• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

^ OPLCO"^_ ^ ^-^^ 3 T1S3 DDSMtDflbl THE W I T C H - C U L T IN WESTERN EUROPE A STUDY IN ANTHROPOT.OGY 1 THE WITCH-CULT '^^^ IN WESTERN EUROPE ^^^ zA Study in ^Anthropology BY MARGARET ALICE MURRAY OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1 92 Oxford University Press London Edinburgh Glasgoiu Copenhagen Neiu Tork Toronto Melbourne Cape Toivn Bombay Calcutta JVIadras Shanghai Humphrey Milfurd Publisher to the UiMveksity PREFACE The mass of existing material on this subject is so great that I have not attempted to make a survey of the whole of European ' Witchcraft', but have confined myself to an inten- sive study of the cult in Great Britain. In order, however, to obtain a clearer understanding of the ritual and beliefs I have had recourse to French and Flemish sources, as the cult appears to have been the same throughout Western Europe. The New England records are unfortunately not published in extenso ; this is the more unfortunate as the extracts already given to the public occasionally throw light on some of the English practices. It is more difficult to trace the English practices than the Scotch or French, for in England the cult was already in a decadent condition when the records were made ; therefore records in a purely English colony would probably contain much of interest. The sources from which the information is taken are the judicial records and contemporary chroniclers. In the case of the chroniclers I have studied their facts and not their opinions. I have also had access to some unpublished trials among the Edinburgh Justiciary Records and also in the Guernsey Greffe. The following articles have already appeared in various journals, to whose editors I am indebted for kind permission ' ' ' to republish : Organization of Witch Societies and Witches ' ' and the number Thirteen in Folk Lore ; The God of the ' in \!a& the Manchester Witches Journal of Oriental Society ; ' Child Sacrifice ', ' Witches' Familiars ', ' The Devil's Mark ', ' ', ' ' The Devil's Officers Witches' Fertility Rites ', Witches 6 PREFACE ' ' Transformations ', In Man ; and The Devil of North Berwick in the Scottish Historical Review. My thanks are due to Georgiana Aitken, W. Bonser, and Mary Slater for much kind help, also to Prof. C. G. Seligman for valuable suggestions and advice as to lines of research. M. A. MURRAY. UNivERsrrv College, London. CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE 5 INTRODUCTION 9 I. CONTINUITY OF THE RELIGION 19 II. THE GOD 28 1. As God ..... 28 2. As a Human Being- 31 3. Identification .... 47 4. As an Animal 60 III. ADMISSION CEREMONIES 71 i.» General ..... • 71 2. The Introduction . 76 3. The Renunciation and Vows . 77 4. The Covenant 79 5. The Baptism . 82 6. The Mark 86 IV. THE ASSEMBLIES 97 1. The Sabbath. Method of going The site The date. The hour 97 2. The Esbat. Business. rhe site. The time 112 y. THE RITES . 124 1. General . 124 3^ Homage . 126 3. The Dances 130 4. The Music ^35 5.>The Feast 138 6. Candles . 144 7.>The Sacrament 148 8. Sacrifices : Of animals. Of children. Of the God . 162 9 Magic W^ords . 8 CONTENTS pagp: VI. THE RITES, conimued 169 1. General . 169 2. Rain-making . 172 3. Fertility , ^n VII. THE ORGANIZATION 186 1. The Officer . 186 2. The Covens . 190 3. Duties 194 4. Discipline 197 Mil. THE FAMILIARS AND TRANSFORMA TION 205 1. The Divining Familiar .... 205 2. The Domestic Familiar .... 208 3. Methods of obtaining Familiars 222 4. Transformations into Animals 230 APPENDIX I. Fairies and Witches ...... 238 APPENDIX II. Trial of Silvain Nevillon. Taken from De Lancres L'lucredtUitii et Mescrcance . 246 APPENDIX III. A. Covens and Names of Members 249 B. Index of Witches' Names, with Notes . 255 APPENDIX I\^ Notes on the Trials of Joan of Arc and Gilles de Rais ........ 270 APPENDIX V. Ointments. Some Notes on 'Flying' By Prof A. J. Clark \ . 279 BIBLIOGRAPHY 281 GENERAL INDEX ... ... 286 INTRODUCTION The subject of Witches and Witchcraft has always suffered from the biassed opinions of the commentators, both contem- porary and of later date. On the one hand are the writers who, having heard the evidence at first hand, believe implicitly in the facts and place upon them the unwarranted construction that those facts were due to supernatural power ; on the other hand are the writers w^ho, taking the evidence on hearsay and disbelieving the conclusions drawn by their opponents, deny the facts in ioto. Both parties believed with equal firmness in a personal Devil, and both supported their arguments with quotations from the Bible. But as the believers were able to bring forward more texts than the unbelievers and had in their hands an unanswerable argument in the Witch of Endor, the unbelievers, who dared not contradict the Word of God, were forced to fall back on the theory that the witches suffered from hallucination, hysteria, and, to use the modern word, ' auto-suggestion '. These two classes still persist, the sceptic predominating. Between the believer who believed everything and the unbeliever who disbelieved everything there has been no critical examination of the evidence, wdiich presents a new and untouched field of research to the student of comparative religion. Among the believers in witchcraft everything which could * not be explained by the knowledge at their disposal was laid to the credit of supernatural powers ; and as everything incomprehensible is usually supposed to emanate from evil,.^ the witches w^ere believed to be possessed of devilish arts. As also every non-Christian God was, in the eyes of the Christian, the opponent of the Christian God, the witches were considered to worship the Kneniy of Salvation, in other words, the Devil. The greater number of these writers, however, obtained the evidence at first hand, and it must therefore be accepted although the statements do not bear the construction put upon them. It is only by a careful comparison with the : lo I N r R O D U C T I O N evidence of anthropolog-y that the facts fall into their proper places and an organized religion stands revealed. The common beliefs as to the powers of the witches are largely due to the credulous contemporary commentators, who misunderstood the evidence and then exaggerated some of the facts to suit their preconceived ideas of the supernatural powers of the witches thereby laying themselves open to the ; ridicule of all their opponents, past and present. Yet the ridicule is not fully deserved, for the facts are there, though the is points, which are explanation wrong ; for even the two usually considered the ultimate proof of the absurdity and incredibility of the whole system —the flying on a broomstick through the window or up the chimney, and the transforma- tion into animals—are capable of explanation. The first can be accounted for when the form of early mound-dwellings is taken into consideration, and w'hen it is remembered that among savage tribes there are often taboos connected with the door, the two-faced god being essentially a deity of the door. Besides this the fertility rites connected with the broom should be taken into account. The second should be compared with similar accounts of transformation into animals among the cults of other nations. Mr. A-. B. Cook's comment on the Greek ritual applies quite as well to Western as to Eastern ' Europe : We may venture on the general statement that within the bounds of Hellenic mythology auiinal-mcfamor- p/iosis connjiouly points to a preceding aiiiiiial citlf^ ' It is interesting to note the class of mind among those con- temporary writers who believed in the reality of the facts confessed at the trials as compared with those who disbelieved. It will be seen that the most brilliant minds, the keenest intel- lects, the greatest investigators, were among the believers Bodin, Lord Bacon, Raleigh, Boyle, Cudworth, Selden, Henry More, Sir Thomas Browne, Matthew Hale, vSir George Mac- kenzie, and many others, most of whom had heard the evidence at first hand. The sceptics were Weyer, pupil of the occultist Cornelius Agrippa ; Reginald Scot, a Kentish country squire ; ' Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1894, p. 160. The italics are in the ori'jinal. 1; I N T R (J D U C T I O N 1 Kilmer, whose name was a byword for political bigotry M^agstaffe, went mad from drink who ; and Webster, a fanatical preacher.' The sceptics, with the exception of Weyer, appear to have had httle or no first-hand evidence ; their only weapon was an appeal to sense and sentiment their common combined ; only method was a flat denial of every statement which appeared to point to supernatural powers. They could not ^ disprove the statements ; they could not explain them without opposing the accepted religious beliefs of their time, and so weakening their cause by exposing themselves to the serious charge of atheism ; therefore they denied evidence which in the case of any other accusation would have been accepted as proof. The evidence which I now bring forward is taken entirely from contemporary sources, i. e. the legal records of the trials, pamphlets giving accounts of individual witches, and the works of Inquisitors and other writers. I have omitted the opinions of the authors, and have examined only the recorded facts, without however including the stories of ghosts and ' other occult ' phenomena with which all the commentators confuse the subject. I have also, for the reason given below, omitted all reference to charms and spells when performed by one witch alone, and have confined myself to those statements only which show the beliefs, organization, and ritual of a hitherto unrecognized cult.

Load more

  312

Copy Link