Learning Representations with Neuromodulators

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Learning Representations with Neuromodulators Learning Representations with Neuromodulators vorgelegt von M. Sc. Rapha¨elHolca-Lamarre geb. in Montr´eal von der Fakult¨atIV { Elektrotechnik und Informatik der Technischen Universi¨atBerlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. nat. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Hennig Sprekeler Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Klaus Obermayer Gutachter: Prof. Dr. J¨orgL¨ucke Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Shu-Chen Li Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 30. Juni 2017 Berlin 2017 To those from whom I learned, alongside whom I went on adventures, or with whom I shared a good laugh. Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors Prof. Klaus Obermayer and Prof. J¨org L¨ucke. Klaus and J¨orgprovided valuable support throughout my PhD, from the initial application for funding to the execution of the work and up until the results publication. Then come all the members of the Neural Information Processing group who I thank, among many others, for their feedback during group talks and their company over lunch breaks{especially enjoyable when sitting outside in the sun. I would also like to express my gratitude to everyone at the Bernstein Centre, both staff and students, for providing a supportive environment, in particular for the many events and courses, the financial support, and the good times, among others at the annual retreat at Schloß Tornow. And last but not least, I acknowledge the funding bodies that made this research possible, the Studientstiftung des deutschen Volkes, the Fonds de Recherche du Qu´ebec { Nature et Technologies, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Abstract Neurons in the cortex and in multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) represent inputs as pat- terns of activity. In both systems, the nature of a neural representation carries im- portant consequences and, accordingly, the mechanisms guiding representation learn- ing are of great relevance. In MLPs, the most widespread learning method is the error-backpropagation algorithm. Although functionally effective, this method bears its limitations and is also unlikely to be implemented in the cortex. On the other hand, the mechanisms orchestrating plasticity in cortical representations remain un- clear; neuromodulators appear to contribute to this process but their exact roles are largely unknown. This thesis examines the plastic effects of two neuromodulators, acetylcholine (ACh) and dopamine (DA), with the following aims: first, to gain a functional understanding of ACh and DA transmission in shaping biological representations and, second, to explore neuromodulator-inspired learning rules for MLPs. I address these questions in a Hebbian-learning neural network model. I extend the model to simulate the plastic effects and physiological release properties of ACh and DA. I then study the impact of neuromodulatory transmission on the network's representation and its performance on a classification task. In the model, ACh activation approximates the concept of attentional effort. I demonstrate that this signal redistributes neural preferences such that more neurons encode challenging or relevant stimulus classes, thereby boosting performance on these classes. DA activation in the model accompanies reward prediction errors. I show that this signal adjusts neural weights to the reward contingencies of a task, in turn enhancing class selectivity in neurons and yielding large gains in classification accu- racy. These results suggest functional roles for ACh and DA in guiding biological representation learning. Additionally, in comparison with MLPs of the same architec- ture, neuromodulator-inspired learning produces lower error rates than those originally reported on the MNIST dataset and measures up with modern state-of-the-art optimi- sation methods. A single modulatory signal also proves to successfully guide learning in multiple layers concurrently in a deep convolutional network. Neuromodulator learning requires weak supervision signals and interacts with synaptically-local weight updates, thus offering potential applications in learning with weakly labelled data or in neuro- morphic processors. vi Zusammenfassung Neuronen im Kortex und in k¨unstlichen neuronalen Netzwerken (z.B. \Multi-layer perceptrons", MPLs) repr¨asentieren Inputs als Aktivit¨atsmuster. In beiden Systemen ist die Natur des neuronalen Codes entscheidend und folglich sind die Mechanismen, die das Lernen von Repr¨asentationen beeinflussen, von großer Bedeutung. In k¨unstlichen Netzwerken ist der `error-backpropagation' Algorithmus die am weitesten verbreitete Lernmethode. Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass diese Methode im Kortex implementiert ist, jedoch ist derzeit nicht bekannt, wie das Gehirn Repr¨asentationen lernt. Die beiden Neuromodulatoren, Acetylcholin (ACh) und Dopamin (DA), l¨osenplas- tische Ver¨anderungenin kortikalen Repr¨asentationen aus. In dieser Arbeit unter- suche ich die funktionalen Rollen, die diese beiden Modulatoren, in Bezug auf die Verbesserung sensorischer Repr¨asentationen, haben. Dabei stehen zwei Ziele im Vorder- grund: Zum einen, soll ein funktionales Verst¨andnisder von ACh und DA ausgel¨osten Plastizit¨atin der Biologie geschaffen werden. Zum anderen, sollen Lernregeln f¨urMPLs erforscht werden, welche von Neuromodulatoren inspiriert sind. Ich behandle diese Fragen mithilfe eines neuronalen Netzwerkmodells, welches auf Hebb'schen Lernregeln basiert. Dazu simuliere ich ACh und DA als Modulatoren der Lernrate des Netzwerkes und best¨atigedadurch, dass dieses Modell bekannte Plastizit¨atseffekteaus der Biologie reproduziert. Danach simuliere ich die physiologischen Eigenschaften der Aussch¨uttung von ACh und DA und quantifiziere deren Auswirkung mithilfe einer Klassifikationsauf- gabe. Im Modell folgt die Ausch¨uttungvon ACh den Anforderungen der Aufgabe und der Motivation, als N¨aherungdes Konzepts des Aufmerksamkeitsaufwandes (`attentional effort’). Ich zeige, dass dieses Signal neuronale Pr¨aferenzderart umverteilt, dass mehr Neuronen herausfordernde oder relevante Stimulusklassen kodieren, was die Klassifika- tion dieser Klassen deutlich verbessert. Ich gehe daher davon aus, dass ACh diese Rolle in der Biologie ausf¨ullt.DA Ausch¨uttung wird im Modell von Belohnungsvorhersage- fehlern (`reward prediction errors') hervorgerufen. Dieses Signal verbessert neuronale Selektivit¨at,was wiederum zu einer Steigerung der Klassifikationsgenauigkeit f¨uhrt.Ich vermute daher, dass die DA-induzierte Plastizit¨atin senorischen Kortexarialen diese Funktion ¨ubernimmt. Angewandt auf den MNIST Datensatz zeigt DA-basiertes Ler- nen eine sehr gute Leistung, die vergleichbar mit modernen Optimisierungsmethoden in MLPs ist. Diese aussichtsreichen Ergebnisse motivieren weitere Forschungen auf dem Gebiet des neuromodulatorisch-inspirierten Lernens als Modell in der Biologie sowie f¨urpraktische Anwendungen. vii Contents Abstract vi Zusammenfassung vii List of Figures xii List of Abbreviations xiii List of Variables xiv List of Parameters xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Brain's Shadow Theatre . 1 1.2 Biological Neural Representations . 2 1.3 Artificial Neural Representations . 3 1.4 Contributions of this Work . 4 1.5 Thesis Outline . 5 2 Sensory Representations in the Cortex 8 2.1 Overview . 8 2.2 Development of Representations . 8 2.2.1 Genetic Program . 9 2.2.2 Experience-dependent Development . 9 2.3 Modifications in Sensory Representations . 10 2.3.1 Sensory Deprivation . 10 2.3.2 Altered Sensory Experience . 11 2.3.3 Perceptual Learning . 11 2.3.4 Classical Conditioning . 12 2.3.5 Cortical Stimulation . 12 2.3.6 Neuromodulation . 12 2.4 Acetylcholine . 13 2.4.1 ACh and Attentional Demand . 14 2.4.2 Plastic Effects on Sensory Representations . 14 2.5 Dopamine . 16 2.5.1 DA and Reward Processing . 17 2.5.2 Plastic Effects on Sensory Representations . 18 2.6 Summary . 18 viii 3 Representation Learning in ANNs 21 3.1 Overview . 21 3.2 Learning Rules in Neural Networks . 21 3.2.1 Hebbian Learning . 22 3.2.2 Error-correcting Rules . 24 3.3 Neural Network Model . 27 3.3.1 Learning Mechanisms . 27 3.3.2 Interpretation as Maximum Likelihood Estimation . 31 3.3.3 Hierarchical Model for Classification . 32 3.3.4 Supplementary Methods . 34 3.4 Models of the Neuromodulators . 35 3.4.1 Modifications in Representations . 35 3.4.2 Models of ACh and DA . 36 3.4.3 Relation to Previous Models . 38 3.5 Summary . 38 4 Model of Acetylcholine 41 4.1 Overview . 41 4.2 Classification Performance as Proxy of Task Demand . 42 4.2.1 Model Description . 42 4.2.2 Results . 43 4.3 Alternate Models of Task Demand . 46 4.3.1 Classification Confidence . 46 4.3.2 Inferred Stimulus Class and Stimulus-Wise Confidence . 48 4.3.3 Results . 49 4.4 Signal of Stimulus Relevance . 51 4.4.1 Non-uniform Stimulus Relevance . 51 4.4.2 Non-uniform Stimulus Distribution . 52 4.5 Additional Effects on Learning . 54 4.5.1 Network Size . 54 4.5.2 Label Availability . 55 4.6 Discussion . 56 4.7 Summary . 57 5 Model of Dopamine 59 5.1 Overview . 59 5.2 Greedy Model . 60 5.2.1 Model Description . 60 5.2.2 Results . 61 5.3 Explorative Model . 65 5.3.1 Methods of Exploration . 66 5.3.2 Model Description . 68 5.3.3 Results . 69 5.4 Expectations as Reward Predictions . 72 5.4.1 Model Description . 73 5.4.2 Results . 74 5.5 Model Comparison . 75 5.5.1 Greedy versus Explorative . 75 ix Learning with Neuromodulators 5.5.2 Discrete versus Continuous Reward Predictions . 77 5.5.3 Comparison with Acetylcholine . 80 5.5.4 Comparison with Error-backpropagation . 81 5.6 Discussion . 85 5.6.1 Relationship to Biology . 85 5.6.2 Relationship to Machine learning . 86 5.7 Summary . 87 6 Deep Convolutional Model 89 6.1 Overview . 89 6.2 Convolutional Network Model . 90 6.2.1 Model Description . 90 6.2.2 Receptive Field Reconstruction . 93 6.3 Hebbian Learning . 94 6.3.1 Results . 94 6.4 Dopamine in Greedy Model . 95 6.4.1 Model Description . 95 6.4.2 Results . 96 6.4.3 Additional Effects on Learning . 97 6.5 Dopamine in Explorative Model . 100 6.5.1 Model Description . 100 6.5.2 Results . 101 6.5.3 Additional Effects on Learning . 102 6.6 Discussion . 103 6.7 Summary .
Recommended publications
  • Masakazu Konishi
    Masakazu Konishi BORN: Kyoto, Japan February 17, 1933 EDUCATION: Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, B.S. (1956) Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, M.S. (1958) University of California, Berkeley, Ph.D. (1963) APPOINTMENTS: Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Tübingen, Germany (1963–1964) Postdoctoral Fellow, Division of Experimental Neurophysiology, Max-Planck Institut, Munich, Germany (1964–1965) Assistant Professor of Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison (1965–1966) Assistant Professor of Biology, Princeton University (1966–1970) Associate Professor of Biology, Princeton University (1970–1975) Professor of Biology, California Institute of Technology (1975– 1980) Bing Professor of Behavioral Biology, California Institute of Technology (1980– ) HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1979) Member, National Academy of Sciences (1985) President, International Society for Neuroethology (1986—1989) F. O. Schmitt Prize (1987) International Prize for Biology (1990) The Lewis S. Rosenstiel Award, Brandeis University (2004) Edward M. Scolnick Prize in Neuroscience, MIT (2004) Gerard Prize, the Society for Neuroscience (2004) Karl Spencer Lashley Award, The American Philosophical Society (2004) The Peter and Patricia Gruber Prize in Neuroscience, The Society for Neuroscience (2005) Masakazu (Mark) Konishi has been one of the leaders in avian neuroethology since the early 1960’s. He is known for his idea that young birds initially remember a tutor song and use the memory as a template to guide the development of their own song. He was the fi rst to show that estrogen prevents programmed cell death in female zebra fi nches. He also pioneered work on the brain mechanisms of sound localization by barn owls. He has trained many students and postdoctoral fellows who became leading neuroethologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory and Vestibular Efferents (Springer Handbook of Auditory
    Springer Handbook of Auditory Research For other titles published in this series, go to www.springer.com/series/2506 David K. Ryugo ● Richard R. Fay Arthur N. Popper Editors Auditory and Vestibular Efferents Editors David K. Ryugo Richard R. Fay Garvan Institute of Medical Research Department of Psychology Program in Neuroscience Loyola University of Chicago 384 Victoria St., Level 7 6525 N. Sheridan Rd. Darlinghurst, NSW 2010 Chicago, Illinois 60626 Australia USA [email protected] [email protected] Arthur N. Popper University of Maryland Department of Biology College Park, Maryland 20742-4415 USA [email protected] ISSN 0947-2657 ISBN 978-1-4419-7069-5 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-7070-1 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7070-1 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2010937633 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Griffin Was Able to Affect a Major Revolution in What Scien- Tists Do and Think About the Cognition of Nonhuman Ani- Mals
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES DONALD R. GRIFFIN 1915– 2003 A Biographical Memoir by CHARLES G. GROSS Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 86 PUBLISHED 2005 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. DONALD R. GRIFFIN August 3, 1915–November 7, 2003 BY CHARLES G. GROSS OST SCIENTISTS SEEK—but never attain—two goals. The M first is to discover something so new as to have been previously inconceivable. The second is to radically change the way the natural world is viewed. Don Griffin did both. He discovered (with Robert Galambos) a new and unique sensory world, echolocation, in which bats can perceive their surroundings by listening to echoes of ultrasonic sounds that they produce. In addition, he brought the study of animal consciousness back from the limbo of forbidden topics to make it a central subject in the contemporary study of brain and behavior. EARLY YEARS Donald R. (Redfield) Griffin was born in Southampton, New York, but spent his early childhood in an eighteenth- century farmhouse in a rural area near Scarsdale, New York. His father, Henry Farrand Griffin, was a serious amateur historian and novelist, who worked as a reporter and in advertising before retiring early to pursue his literary inter- ests. His mother, Mary Whitney Redfield, read to him so much that his father feared for his ability to learn to read. His favorite books were Ernest Thompson Seton’s animal 3 4 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS stories and the National Geographic Magazine’s Mammals of North America.
    [Show full text]
  • 16207032 Lprob 1.Pdf
    The Auditory Cortex Jeffery A. Winer · Christoph E. Schreiner Editors The Auditory Cortex 123 Editors Jeffery A. Winer Christoph E. Schreiner Department of Molecular & Cell Biology Coleman Memorial Laboratory University of California Department of Otolaryngology Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA University of California San Francisco, CA 94143-0732, USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-0073-9 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-0074-6 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0074-6 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Photograph courtesy of Jane A. Winer A. Photograph courtesy of Jane Jeffery A. Winer (1945–2008) Scholar, scientist, colleague, mentor, friend Photograph courtesy of Jane A. Winer Preface This volume is a summary and synthesis of the current state of auditory forebrain organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Serotonergic Modulation of Plasticity of the Auditory Cortex Elicited by Fear Conditioning
    4910 • The Journal of Neuroscience, May 2, 2007 • 27(18):4910–4918 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Serotonergic Modulation of Plasticity of the Auditory Cortex Elicited by Fear Conditioning Weiqing Ji and Nobuo Suga Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 In the awake big brown bat, 30 min auditory fear conditioning elicits conditioned heart rate decrease and long-term best frequency (BF) shifts of cortical auditory neurons toward the frequency of the conditioned tone; 15 min conditioning elicits subthreshold cortical BF shifts that can be augmented by acetylcholine. The fear conditioning causes stress and an increase in the cortical serotonin (5-HT) level. Serotonergic neurons in the raphe nuclei associated with stress and fear project to the cerebral cortex and cholinergic basal forebrain. Recently, it has been shown that 5-HT2A receptors are mostly expressed on pyramidal neurons and their activation improves learning and ␣ memory. We applied 5-HT, an agonist ( -methyl-5-HT), or an antagonist (ritanserin) of 5-HT2A receptors to the primary auditory cortex and discovered the following drug effects: (1) 5-HT had no effect on the conditioned heart rate change, although it reduced the auditory responses; (2) 4 mM 5-HT augmented the subthreshold BF shifts, whereas 20 mM 5-HT did not; (3) 20 mM 5-HT reduced the long-term BF shifts and changed them into short-term; (4) ␣-methyl-5-HT increased the auditory responses and augmented the subthreshold BF shifts aswellasthelong-termBFshifts;(5)incontrast,ritanserinreducedtheauditoryresponsesandreversedthedirectionoftheBFshifts.Our data indicate that the BF shift can be modulated by serotonergic neurons that augment or reduce the BF shift or even reverse the direction of the BF shift.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6 This Page Intentionally Left Blank the History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6
    The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6 This page intentionally left blank The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6 Edited by Larry R. Squire 1 2009 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2009 by Society for Neuroscience Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Control Number: 96070950 ISBN: 978–0–19–538010–1 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Contents Previous Contributors vii Preface to Volume 1 ix Preface to Volume 6 xi Bernard W. Agranoff 1 Emilio Bizzi 32 Marian Cleeves Diamond 62 Charles G. Gross 96 Richard Held 158 Leslie L. Iversen 188 Masakazu Konishi 226 Lawrence Kruger 264 Susan E. Leeman 318 Vernon B. Mountcastle 342 Shigetada Nakanishi 382 Solomon H. Snyder 420 Nobuo Suga 480 Hans Thoenen 514 Index of Names This page intentionally left blank Previous Contributors Volume 1 Denise Albe-Fessard Herbert H.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSUMU HAGIWARA November 6, 1922–April 1, 1989
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES S U S U M U H A G I W ARA 1922—1989 A Biographical Memoir by ThEODORE H. BULLOCK AN D AL A N D . G R I N N E L L Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1996 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. SUSUMU HAGIWARA November 6, 1922–April 1, 1989 BY THEODORE H. BULLOCK AND ALAN D. GRINNELL ORN IN YUBARI, Hokkaido, Japan, on November 6, 1922, Bthe son of a school principal, Susumu Hagiwara went through public schools, graduating from high school in Mito, Honshu. Among the boyhood hobbies that persisted through- out his life were butterfly observation and collecting, be- gun with his father. He also enjoyed bird watching and painting. He was one of the select few admitted to the pres- tigious University of Tokyo. There he completed both his medical degree in 1946 and Ph.D. in physiology under Prof. T. Wakabayashi in 1951. During this period he was diag- nosed with tuberculosis and had one lung removed, but he continued to write papers during his convalescence and recovered enough to live a surprisingly normal life. In 1948 his first paper demonstrated that cicadas begin to sing at a certain level of light in the morning, delayed correspondingly on cloudy days. His thesis topic, the fluc- tuation of intervals in rhythmic excitation in frog stretch receptors, with comparisons to the intervals in human mo- tor units during voluntary movement, foretold a lifelong bent toward comparative physiology.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2015 March 2011
    International Society for Neuroethology Newsletter/December 2015 March 2011 International Society for Neuroethology PHONE: +1-785-843-1235 P.O. Box 1897 (or 1-800-627-0629 Ext. 233) Lawrence, KS 66044, USA FAX: +1-785-843-1274 Website: http://neuroethology.org/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/neuroethology/ E-mail: [email protected] ISN Officers THIS ISSUE INCLUDES President: Peter Narins, Department of Integrative President’s Column by Peter Narins Biology and Physiology, 621 Charles E. Young Drive Allison Doupe by Darcy Kelley & Russ Fernald South, Box 951606, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606 USA Annemarie Surlykke by Cynthia Moss et al. PHONE: +1-310-825-0265 FAX: +1-310-206-3987 Midwest Neurobiologists by Lon Wilkens Scientific PDA by Kate Feller E-mail: [email protected] Ask Gabby by Gabriella Wolff Focus on Early Career Investigators Treasurer: Karen Mesce, Department of Entomology Getting Ready for ICN 2016 by the Local Organizing and Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Committee in Montevideo Minnesota, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, New Award Deadlines Saint Paul, MN 55108 USA PHONE: +1-612-624-3734 FAX: +1-612-625-5299 E-mail: [email protected] Secretary: Susan Fahrbach, Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Box 7325, Winston-Salem, NC 27109 USA PHONE: +1-336-758-5023 FAX: +1-336-758-6008 E-mail: [email protected] The Prez Says Past-President: Alison Mercer, Department of Zoology, Peter Narins University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, NZ President of the ISN PHONE: +64 3 479 7961 FAX: +64 3 479 7584 E-mail: [email protected] Greetings from California! President-Elect: Catharine Rankin, Department of As you may know, the Acoustical Society of America Psychology, Kenny Room 3525 – 2136 West Mall, had its 170th meeting in Jacksonville, FL in early University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC November.
    [Show full text]
  • Echolocating Bats Cease Vocalizing to Avoid Sonar Jamming
    Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming Chen Chiu, Wei Xian, and Cynthia F. Moss* Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Edited by Nobuo Suga, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, and approved June 16, 2008 (received for review May 6, 2008) Although it has been recognized that echolocating bats may experi- Since spherical spreading loss and excess attenuation of ultrasonic ence jamming from the signals of conspecifics, research on this frequencies produce a decrease in acoustic energy with distance (7), problem has focused exclusively on time-frequency adjustments in one would predict a negative correlation between interference level the emitted signals to minimize interference. Here, we report a and inter-bat spatial separation. In addition, the sonar radiation surprising new strategy used by bats to avoid interference, namely pattern (8, 9) and receiver (10, 11) are directional. Thus, the angle silence. In a quantitative study of flight and vocal behavior of the big between two bats’ heading directions would also be expected to brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), we discovered that the bat spends impact interference level and concomitant adjustments in sonar considerable time in silence when flying with conspecifics. Silent behavior. behavior, defined here as at least one bat in a pair ceasing vocaliza- Exploiting technological advances, we were able to quantitatively tion for more than 0.2 s (200 ms), occurred as much as 76% of the time analyze strategies that an echolocating big brown bat, Eptesicus (mean of 40% across 7 pairs) when their separation was shorter than fuscus, uses to avoid signal interference when flying with a con- 1 m, but only 0.08% when a single bat flew alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Floyd E. Bloom 1 Joaquín Fuster 58 Michael S
    The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 7 This page intentionally left blank The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 7 Edited by Larry R. Squire 1 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2012 by Society for Neuroscience Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. ____________________________________________ Library of Congress Control Number: 96070950 ISBN-13: 978–0–19–539613–3 ____________________________________________ 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Contents Previous Contributors vii Preface to Volume 1 ix Preface to Volume 7 xi Floyd E. Bloom 1 Joaquín Fuster 58 Michael S. Gazzaniga 98 Bertil Hille 140 Ivan Izquierdo 188 Edward Jones 232 Krešimir Krnjevic´ 278 Nicole M. Le Douarin 334 Terje L ømo 382 Michael M. Merzenich 438 John Wilson Moore 476 Robert Y. Moore 530 Michael I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corticofugal System for Hearing: Recent Progress
    Colloquium The corticofugal system for hearing: Recent progress Nobuo Suga*, Enquan Gao†, Yunfeng Zhang‡, Xiaofeng Ma, and John F. Olsen Department of Biology, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130 Peripheral auditory neurons are tuned to single frequencies of inhibitory, and facilitatory neural interactions take place at sound. In the central auditory system, excitatory (or facilitatory) multiple levels and produce neurons with sharp level-tolerant and inhibitory neural interactions take place at multiple levels and (the width of a frequency tuning curve is narrow regardless of produce neurons with sharp level-tolerant frequency-tuning sound levels) frequency tuning curves (1) and also neurons tuned curves, neurons tuned to parameters other than frequency, co- to specific values of parameters other than frequency. Some of chleotopic (frequency) maps, which are different from the periph- these neurons apparently are related to the processing of bio- eral cochleotopic map, and computational maps. The mechanisms sonar signals. They are latency-constant, phasic on-responding to create the response properties of these neurons have been neurons (2, 3); paradoxical latency-shift neurons (4); duration- considered to be solely caused by divergent and convergent tuned neurons (5); frequency modulation (FM)-sensitive or projections of neurons in the ascending auditory system. The -specialized neurons (6–8); sharply frequency-tuned neurons recent research on the corticofugal (descending) auditory system, showing level tolerancy (9, 10); FM or amplitude modulation however, indicates that the corticofugal system adjusts and im- (AM) rate-tuned neurons (11); constant frequency (CF)͞CF proves auditory signal processing by modulating neural responses and FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons (12); neurons tuned and maps.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2001
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR NEUROETHOLOGY Newsletter November, 2001 International Society for Neuroethology c/o Panacea Associates phone/fax: +001 (850) 894_3480 744 Duparc Circle E-mail: [email protected] Tallahassee FL 32312 USA Website: www.neurobio.arizona.edu/isn/ ©2001 Int’l Soc. Neuroethology. Authors may freely use the material they have provided. to hearing from you on things we should be doing to promote our discipline. ISN OFFICERS The Sixth congress in Bonn was a great success! The PRESIDENT: Albert S. Feng, Dept. Molecular & congress attendance and the scientific presentations were Integrative Physiology, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801 super, and the congress location was ideal. I hope you USA Phone:1_217_244_1951, FAX: 1_217_244_5180, enjoyed the meeting as much as I did. The Congress [email protected]. organizers led by Horst Bleckmann and the student TREASURER: Sheryl Coombs, Parmly Hearing Inst., helpers did a splendid job organizing the meeting. The Loyola Univ. of Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, Congress Program Committee, under the stewardship of IL 60626 USA. Phone: 1-713 508-2720; FAX: 1-713 508- Hermann Wagner, put together a very exciting scientific 2719; [email protected] program. We very much appreciate their fine work! Of SECRETARY: Arthur N. Popper, Dept. of Biology, Univ. course, your s of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA. Phone:1_301_405_1940, FAX: 1_301_314_9358, [email protected] PAST PRESIDENT: Malcolm Burrows, Dept. of strong participation in the congress was the ultimate Zoology, Cambridge Univ., Downing St., Cambridge, UK recipe for the success. The organizers and chairs of the CB2 3EJ.
    [Show full text]