DOCSLIB.ORG

Maricopa County HUC10 Watersheds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maricopa County HUC10 Watersheds Maricopa County HUC!(10 !(Watersheds !( !(JER!(OME !(HAPPY JACK 206 206 193 !( 181 209 CHINO VALLEY 1!(94 215 219 201 203 218 !( !(210 220 RIM ROCK BAGDAD IRON SPRINGS CHERRY !( !( !( CAMP VERDE 223 PRESCOTT DEWEY !( 221 SKULL VALL!(EY !( !( !(HUMBOLT 229 W!(ALKER227 234 HILLSIDE233 WILHOIT !( !( !( !( MAYER 232 241 230 KIRKLAND !( !( PINE !( GOODWIN DUGAS CHILDS S!(TRAWBERRY !( !( !( 247 DATE CREEK KIRKLAND JUNCTION !( TONTO VILLAGE CORDES !( !( !( !( CLEATOR!( 246 !( 243 !( PEEPLES VALLEY 244 YARNELL WAGONER PA!(YSON 251 !( !( 249 !( 253 STANTON !( !( !( OCTAVE CROWN KING!( 255 !( !( BUMBLE BEE 254 261 CONGRESS GISELA RYE259!( CONSTELLATION !( !( !(ROCK SPRINGS 270 262 BLACK CANYON CITY!( 265 JAKES CORNER271 WICKENBURG SEVEN SPRINGS !( AGUILA267 !( !(269 !( !( CASTLE HOT SPRINGS 276 GLADDEN NEW RIVER CAMP CREEK 280 !( !( !( MORRISTOWN SUNFLOWER279 !( !( !( CIRCLE CITY CAREFREE 293 !( 278 28!(4!( PUNKIN CENTER 297 !( 285 286 295 307 301 BEARDSLEY !( SURPRISE FORT McDOWELL !( !( !( ROOSEVELT305 304 291 294!( PEORIA 302 FOUNTAIN HILLS !(!( !( !( YOUNGTOWNSUN CITY 313 !(GLENDALE!( TORTILLA FLATS312 311 TONOPAH LITCHFIELD PARK !( 308 !( !( SCOTTSDALE PHOENIX!( WINTERSBURG GOODYEARC!(ASHION !( 318 !( !( !(!( !( TEMPEMESA APACHE JUNCTION !( !( !( BUCKEYE LIBERTY 317 KINGS RANCH 330 !(322!( LAVEEN GUADALUPEGILBERT !( AR!(LIN!(GTON !( !( !( !( HASSAYAMPAPALO VERDE ST. JOHNS CHANDLERHIGLEY 325 KOMATKE !( !( !( 331 !( BOYS RANCH !( !( SERAPE!( 338 336 RAINBOW VALLEY !( !(QUEEN CREEK !( 342 !( 335OCOTILLO SUNDAD !( !( !( 354 BAPCHULE MAGMA 348 !( COTTON CENTER 344 OLBERG !( !( SACATON!( 350 MOBILE !( !( HYDER 352 !( !( !( 356 359 336 AGUA CALIENTE !( MARICOPA 3!(57 !( BOSQUE FLORENCE GILA BEND!( 363 !( 353 362 !( 360 !( !( COOLIDGERANDOLPH THEBA STANFIELD LA PALM!(A SENTINEL BIG HORNFREEMAN !( !( !( !( !( 361 !( !( !( CASA GRANDE AZTEC 371 370 377 380 CHUICHU ELOY 376 !( !( !( 382 CUCKLEBUR !(PICACHO 381 !( 373 391 384 FRIENDLY CORNER 374 KOHATK !( 379 !( RED ROCK 397 !( 404 !( 401 KAKA !( 405 NORTH KOMELIK 403 VENTANA !( 408 CHILDS !( MARANA !( 398 SAGUARO !( !( RILLITO AJO HICKIWAN ANEGAM SILVER BELLS !( 414 !( 406 !( !( !( CORTARO 407 415 !(VAYA CHIN !(S!(AN LOUIS !( !( 413 416 409 AK CHIN 403 !( WHY 421 SANTA ROS!(A QUEENS WELL !( CHARCO !( GUN!(SIGHT SIL NAKYA 418 !( !( ¯ TRACY 433 427 !( 425 !( !(QUIJOTOA CHOT VAYA COVERED WELLS !( 424 429 !( !( SIKUL HIMATLE LINCOLNCABABI SAN PEDRO GU VO437 !( !(!( Legend435!( !( 438 !( PISINIMO !( NOLIA 442 !( SA!(N!( LUI!(S !(COMOBABI !( !( Hig!(hways/R4o4a3ds 447 SANTA CRUZ 439 FRESNAL PAN TANK !( !( 441 !( Mohave Watersheds (HUC10) 0 14048 20 !(KUPK40BIGM FiIEleLDsSELLS LUKEVILLE449 !( !( !( 445 !( 450 !(ARTESA !( 457 451 453 !( !( Maricopa County HUC10 Watersheds !( !( 206 204 !( 193 !(JER!(OME !( 181 181 181 209 CHINO VALLEY !( 1!(94 HAPPY JACK 215 219 218 RIM ROCK210 201 207 220 203 !(M!(cGUIREVILLE BAGDAD IRON SPRINGS CHERRY !( !( !( CAMP VERDE 223 PRESCOTT DEWEY !( 221 SKULL VALL!(EY !( !( !(HUMBOLT 229 W!(ALKER227 234 HILLSIDE233 WILHOIT !( !( !( !( MAYER 232 241 230 KIRKLAND !( !( PINE !( GOODWIN DUGAS CHILDS S!(TRAWBERRY !( !( !( DATE CREEK KIRKLAND JUNCTION !( 237 247 CORDES !( !( !( !( CLEATOR!( 246 !( 243 !( KOHLS RANCH PEEPLES VALLEY 244 YARNELL WAGONER PA!(YSON 251 !( !( 249 !( 253 STANTON !( !( !( OCTAVE CROWN KING!( 255 !( !( BUMBLE BEE 254 CONGRESS GISELA 261 RYE259!( CONSTELLATION !( !( !(ROCK SPRINGS 270 262 BLACK CANYON CITY!( 265 JAKES CORNER271 WICKENBURG SEVEN SPRINGS !( AGUILA267 !( !(269 !( !( CASTLE HOT SPRINGS 276 GLADDEN NEW RIVER CAMP CREEK 280 !( !( !( MORRISTOWN SUNFLOWER279 !( !( CIRCLE CITY CAREFREE !( 293 !( 278 28!(4!( PUNKIN CENTER 297 !( 285 286 295 307 304 301 BEARDSLEY !( SURPRISE FORT McDOWELL !( !( !( ROOSEVELT305 291 294!( PEORIA 302 FOUNTAIN HILLS !(!( !( !( YOUNGTOWNSUN CITY 313 !(GLENDALE!( TORTILLA FLATS312 311 TONOPAH LITCHFIELD PARK !( !( !( SCOTTSDALE 308 PHOENIX!( WINTERSBURG GOODYEARC!(ASHION !( 318 !( !( !(!( !( TEMPEMESA APACHE JUNCTION !( !( !( BUCKEYE LIBERTY 317 KINGS RANCH !(322!( LAVEEN GUADALUPEGILBERT !( 330 AR!(LIN!(GTON !( !( !( HASSAY!(AMPAPALO VERDE CHANDLERHIGLEY 325 ST. JOHNS !( !( !( 331 !( KOMATKE !( !( SERAPE!(BOYS RANCH 338 336 RAINBOW VALLEY !( !(QUEEN CREEK!( !( 335OCOTILLO 342 SUNDAD !( !( !( 354 BAPCHULE MAGMA 348 !( COTTON CENTER 344 OLBERG !( !( SACATO!(N 350 MOBILE !( !(!( HYDER 352 !( !( !( 356 359 336 AGUA CALIENTE !( MARICOPA 3!(57 !( BOSQUE FLORENCE GILA BEND!( 363 !( 353 362 !( 360 !( !( COOLIDGERANDOLPH THEBA STANFIELD LA PALM!(A SENTINEL BIG HORNFREEMAN !( !( !( !( !( 361 !( !( !( CASA GRANDE AZTEC 371 370 377 380 CHUICHU ELOY 376 !( !( !( 382 CUCKLEBUR !(PICACHO 381 !( 373 Legend 391 384 FRIENDLY CORNER 374 KOHATK !( 379 !(Highways/Roads 397 !( RED ROCK 404 Mohave Wate!(rsheds (HUC10) 401 KAKA405 NORTH KOMELIK !( !( 403 VENTANA Land Ownership/Jur4s0id8iction CHILDS !( MARANA !( 398 NSo ADGatUaARO !( !( RILLITO !( AJO HICKIWAN ANEGAM BLMSILVER BELLS 414 !( 406 !( !( !( CORTARO 407 415 !(VAYA CHIN !(S!(AN LOUIS Forest !( !( 413 416 409 AK CHIN !( WHY 421 SANTA ROS!(A QUEIEnNdiSan W REesL.L 422 !( CHARCO !( GUN!(SIGHT SIL NAKYA Local or State Parks 418 !( TRACY 425 !( 433 !( 427 !( Military !( !( !(QUIJOTOA CHOT VAYA COVERED WELLS !( 424 429 !( !( Natl. Parks SIKUL HIMATLE LINCOLNCABABI SAN PEDRO GU VO !( !(!( 43O5th!(er !( 437 PISINIMO !( NOLIA !( 442 438 !( SA!(N LUIS !(COMOBABI !( !( Private ROBLES JUNCTION !( !( !( 443 447 SANTA CRUZ 439 !( 441 FRESNAL PSAtaNte TTAruNsKt ¯ !( !( 0 5 41408 20 Mile!(sKUPK BIG FIELDSELLS LUKEVILLE449 !( !( !( Wildlife 445 !( 450 !(ARTESA 451 !( !( 453 !( !( !( Arizona DroughtWatch - Maricopa County HUC10 Watersheds Watershed Map Number Watershed Name Official HUC Watershed Size (acres) Notes 259 Rye Creek-Tonto Creek 1506010503 192593 262 Middle Hassayampa River 1507010303 223648 265 Sols Wash 1507010302 91873 267 Aguila Valley Area-Centennial Wash 1507010401 232304 269 Agua Fria River-Lake Pleasant 1507010205 237961 Lower Verde River-Horseshoe and Bartlett 276 Reservoir 1506020305 192150 278 New River 1507010208 226035 279 Gun Creek-Tonto Creek 1506010504 175427 280 McMullen Valley Area-Centennial Wash 1507010402 213539 284 Cave Creek-Arizona Canal Diversion Channel 1507010206 184619 285 Trilby Wash-Trilby Wash Basin 1507010207 154998 286 Mesquite Wash-Sycamore Creek 1506020306 123244 291 Lower Hassayampa River 1507010305 211821 294 Agua Fria River below Lake Pleasant 1507010209 297159 295 Camp Creek-Lower Verde River 1506020307 170459 297 Jackrabbit Wash 1507010304 209050 301 Tiger Wash 1507010403 116978 302 Indian Bend Wash 1506010602 138646 304 Upper Harquahala Plains Area-Centennial Wash 1507010404 153841 305 Upper Salt River-Theodore Roosevelt Lake 1506010309 165950 307 Tonto Creek-Theodore Roosevelt Lake 1506010505 65262 311 Middle Harquahala Plains Area-Centennial Wash 1507010405 206508 Lower Salt River-Apache, Canyon, and Saguaro 312 Lake 1506010601 248597 313 Winters Wash 1507010406 165735 317 Lower Salt River below Saguaro Lake 1506010603 220821 318 Pinto Creek 1506010307 118943 322 Luke Wash-Lower Gila River 1507010102 203596 325 Lower Harquahala Plains Area-Centennial Wash 1507010407 156618 330 Clanton Wash 1507020103 124833 331 Middle Queen Creek 1505010008 259716 335 Middle Gila River below Queen Creek 1505010011 286134 344 Waterman Wash 1507010101 271109 348 Columbus Wash 1507020101 115069 350 Fourth of July Wash-Lower Gila River 1507020102 213488 352 Rainbow Wash-Lower Gila River 1507010104 255476 353 Nottbusch Wash-Lower Gila River 1507020105 103768 354 Lower Queen Creek 1505010009 100455 356 Lower Santa Cruz Wash 1505030306 145244 360 Lower Vekol Wash 1505030305 158261 361 Park Valley-Lower Gila River 1507020109 161511 362 Lower Gila River-Painted Rock Reservoir 1507010107 225102 371 Sand Tank Wash 1507010103 168285 373 Quilotosa Wash 1507010105 68737 374 Sauceda Wash 1507010106 95652 Arizona DroughtWatch - Maricopa County HUC10 Watersheds Watershed Map Number Watershed Name Official HUC Watershed Size (acres) Notes 376 Upper Vekol Wash 1505030304 157166 380 Lower Midway Wash Area 1507020203 195135 381 Lower Tenmile Wash 1507020204 146897 384 Lower San Cristobal Wash 1507020307 196451 397 Childs Valley 1507020306 95174 401 Upper Midway Wash 1507020201 140935 405 Kohatk Wash 1505030602 180694 406 Upper Tenmile Wash 1507020202 204996 407 Growler Wash 1507020304 241433 414 Daniels Arroyo 1507020303 98159 415 Hickiwan Wash 1508010101 136482.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR
    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gila and Little Colorado General Stream Adjudications
    THE GILA AND LITTLE COLORADO GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATIONS Cynthia M. Chandley 1 ©© 2014 2014 Snell Snell & & Wilmer Wilmer Arizona’s Watersheds 2 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Scope of Adjudications Gila Adjudication Little Colorado River Adjudication 30,000 5,000 SOCs SOCs Claimants 85,000 14,000 Claimants 3 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Initiation of Arizona’s Adjudications SRP initiates U.S. Supreme Court Phelps Dodge Verde River Buckeye Irrigation decides jurisdiction in on- initiates Little Adjudication District intervenes going state adjudications. Colorado River Ariz. v. San Carlos Adjudication Apache Tribe (U.S. 1983) 1974 1976 1978 1979 1980 1981 1983 1985 Arizona Supreme SRP initiates Phelps Dodge initiates Court consolidates Salt River Gila River Adjudication Arizona Arizona Supreme Court Gila River cases Adjudication Adjudication statues decides state jurisdiction ASARCO initiates San revised over federal and Indian Pedro River Adjudication water rights. U.S. v. Superior Court (Ariz. 1985) 4 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Maricopa County Court Proceedings • 1986 – Judge Goodfarb issues Pretrial Order No. 1 • 1990 – Arizona Supreme Court grants interlocutory review of six key issues 5 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Arizona Supreme Court Rulings • Issue 1: Service of process – Gila I (1992) • Issue 2: Subflow – Gila II (1993) & Gila IV (2000) • Issue 3: Indian reserved water rights – Gila V (2001) • Issues 4 & 5: Federal reserved groundwater rights – Gila III (1999) • Issue 6: To be decided. 6 © 2014 Snell & Wilmer Major Adjudication Issues Subflow Trial No. 1; Adjudication Gila III and San Subflow Order Carlos Apache Court defines ADWR Subflow defines saturated Tribe, et al. v. ADWR Subflow 50%/90-day test Technical Report floodplain Holocene Superior Court Delineation ADWR Revised alluvium and evidentiary Report Subflow Report hearing 1986 1988 1993 1994 1995 1999 2000 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2014 2012 20142014 Pretrial Order Gila IV – affirms Gila II: rejects Subflow Subflow trial No.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey
    THEODORE ROOSEVELT RESERVOIR 1995 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY 1.FOkTF1Ep02. RESOiJ U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation ERRATA Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey Page 10, Table 1, item 9: This should read 2,100 feet rather than 2214. Page 12, Table 1, item 47,footnote 1: Modifications to Roosevelt Dam completed in 1995 raised the dam elevation and lowered the spillway sill elevation. The original dam elevation was 2142 and the spiliway elevation (top of radial gates) was 2136. Page 13. Table 2, ,foolnole 7: Computed sediment expressed as a percentage of total computed sediment (182,185 acre-feet). REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE FormApproved J 0MB No. 0704-0188 Pubhc reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the cotlection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suit 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paper-work Reduction Report (0704-0188), Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED May 1996 Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTiTLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey PR 6. AUTHOR(S) Joe Lyons and Lori Lest 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Bureau of Reclamation REPORT NUMBER Technical Service Center Denver CO 80225 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Valid Values Reference Manual
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual . March, 2019 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Table A-1 Matrix .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Table A-2 Coord Geometric type .................................................................................................................. 7 Table A-3 Horizontal Collection Method ..................................................................................................... 7 Table A-4 Horizontal Accuracy Units .......................................................................................................... 8 Table A-5 Horizontal Datum ........................................................................................................................ 8 Table A-6 Elevation Collection Method ....................................................................................................... 8 Table A-7 Elevation Datum .......................................................................................................................... 9 Table A-8 Material ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Table
    [Show full text]
  • GR-03-13 Revised Title 5, Criminal Code
    GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY SACATON, AZ 85147 ORDINANCE GR-03-13 THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY COUNCIL HEREBY AMENDS THE 2009 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY CODE BY RESCINDING TITLE 5, CRIMINAL CODE, AND ENACTING THE REVISED CRIMINAL CODE WHEREAS, the Gila River Indian Community Council (the "Community Council") is the governing body of the Gila River Indian Community (the "Community), a federally recognized and sovereign Indian tribe; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section l(a)(9) of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Community (March 17, 1960) (the "Constitution") to promote and protect the health, peace, morals, education, and general welfare of the Community and its members; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a)(17) of the Constitution to provide for the maintenance of law and order and the administration of justice by establishing a Community Court and police force and defining the powers and duties thereof; and WHEREAS, the Community Council is authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a)(19) of the Constitution to pass ordinances necessary or incidental to the exercise of any of their powers authorized by Article XV, Section 1(a) of the Constitution; and WHEREAS, the power to enact laws and ordinances is an inherent function of self-government which the Community has exercised over the years; and WHEREAS, the safety of the Community, the ability to prosecute criminal behavior, and the ability to order longer or enhanced sentences as appropriate to the offense and
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Affected Environment Lower Sonoran/SDNM Draft RMP/EIS 253
    Chapter 3. Affected Environment Lower Sonoran/SDNM Draft RMP/EIS 253 3.1. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the environment within the Lower Sonoran Planning Area that would potentially be affected by actions proposed under the alternatives described in Chapter 2, Alternatives (p. 27). While the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is only responsible for managing BLM-administered public lands (public lands) within the Planning Area (i.e. the Lower Sonoran and Sonoran Desert National Monument [SDNM] Decision Areas), proposed decisions may affect environmental components outside the Decision Areas. Therefore, unless indicated otherwise, discussion and analysis in this section encompasses the Planning Area as a whole. The environmental components potentially impacted consist of resource and management activities listed below. The foreseeable environmental effects of the alternatives on these same resource and management activities are described in Chapter 4, Environmental Consequences (p. 371). Resources Resource Uses Air Quality Lands and Realty Cave Resources Livestock Grazing Management Climate Change Minerals Management Cultural and Heritage Resources Recreation Management Geology Travel Management Paleontological Resources Special Area Designations Priority Wildlife Species and Habitat Management National Landscape Conservation System Soil Resources Administrative Designations Vegetation Resources Other Special Designations Visual Resources Social and Economic Water Resources Tribal Interests Wild Horse & Burro Management Hazardous Materials and Public Safety Wilderness Characteristics Social and Economic Conditions Wildland Fire Management The data and descriptions of these categories are drawn from the Analysis of the Management Situation (AMS) (BLM 2005) and subsequent, completed resource assessments on several of the environmental components occurring within the Planning Area. The AMS is available for public review at the BLM’s Phoenix District Office.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA WATER ATLAS Volume 1 Executive Summary ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Arizona Department of Water Resources September 2010 ARIZONA WATER ATLAS Volume 1 Executive Summary ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Director, Arizona Department of Water Resources Herbert Guenther Deputy Director, Arizona Department of Water Resources Karen Smith Assistant Director, Hydrology Frank Corkhill Assistant Director, Water Management Sandra Fabritz-Whitney Atlas Team (Current and Former ADWR staff) Linda Stitzer, Rich Burtell – Project Managers Kelly Mott Lacroix - Asst. Project Manager Phyllis Andrews Carol Birks Joe Stuart Major Contributors (Current and Former ADWR staff) Tom Carr John Fortune Leslie Graser William H. Remick Saeid Tadayon-USGS Other Contributors (Current and Former ADWR staff) Matt Beversdorf Patrick Brand Roberto Chavez Jenna Gillis Laura Grignano (Volume 8) Sharon Morris Pam Nagel (Volume 8) Mark Preszler Kenneth Seasholes (Volume 8) Jeff Tannler (Volume 8) Larri Tearman Dianne Yunker Climate Gregg Garfin - CLIMAS, University of Arizona Ben Crawford - CLIMAS, University of Arizona Casey Thornbrugh - CLIMAS, University of Arizona Michael Crimmins – Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona The Atlas is wide in scope and it is not possible to mention all those who helped at some time in its production, both inside and outside the Department. Our sincere thanks to those who willingly provided data and information, editorial review, production support and other help during this multi-year project. Arizona Water Atlas Volume 1 CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 Atlas Purpose and Scope 1 SECTION 1.1 Atlas
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Sky Sanctuaries in Arizona
    Dark Sky Sanctuaries in Arizona Eric Menasco NPS Terry Reiners Arizona is the astrotourism capital of the United States. Its diverse landscape—from the Grand Canyon and ponderosa forests in the north to the Sonoran Desert and “sky islands” in the south—is home to more certified Dark Sky Places than any other U.S. state. In fact, no country outside the U.S. can rival Arizona’s 16 dark-sky communities and parks. Arizona helped birth the dark-sky preservation movement when, in 2001, the International Dark Sky Association (IDA) designated Flagstaff as the world’s very first Dark Sky Place for the city’s commitment to protecting its stargazing- friendly night skies. Since then, six other Arizona communities—Sedona, Big Park, Camp Verde, Thunder Mountain Pootseev Nightsky and Fountain Hills—have earned Dark Sky status from the IDA. Arizona also boasts nine Dark Sky Parks, defined by the IDA as lands with “exceptional quality of starry nights and a nocturnal environment that is specifically protected for its scientific, natural, educational, cultural heritage, and/or public enjoyment.” The most famous of these is Grand Canyon National Park, where remarkably beautiful night skies lend draw-dropping credence to the Park Service’s reminder that “half the park is after dark Of the 16 Certified IDA International Dark Sky Communities in the US, 6 are in Arizona. These include: • Big Park/Village of Oak Creek, Arizona • Camp Verde, Arizona • Flagstaff, Arizona • Fountain Hills, Arizona • Sedona, Arizona • Thunder Mountain Pootsee Nightsky- Kaibab Paiute Reservation, Arizona Arizona Office of Tourism—Dark Skies Page 1 Facebook: @arizonatravel Instagram: @visit_arizona Twitter: @ArizonaTourism #VisitArizona Arizona is also home to 10 Certified IDA Dark Sky Parks, including: Northern Arizona: Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument Offering multiple hiking trails around this former volcanic cinder cone, visitors can join rangers on tours to learn about geology, wildlife, and lava flows.
    [Show full text]
  • SURVEY of REAERATION NEEDS on BUREAU of RECLAMATION PROJECTS ,-->,-\ N Z G 3
    PAP 2 HYDRAULICS BRANCH OFFICIAL FILE COPY c SURVEY OF REAERATION NEEDS ON BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PROJECTS ,-->,-\ N z g 3 by E. J. Carlson Hydraulics Branch Division of General Research Engineering and Research Center Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado February 1972 OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1001 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.0 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum Memorandum Denver, Colorado TO Chief, Division of General Research, DATE: June 30, 1972 Regional Director, Region 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 FROM E. J. Carlson SUBJECT: Completion of Study Team Report The report, "Survey of Reaeration Needs on Bureau Projects," was prepared from data obtained mainly from Regional Personnel. Copies of the report are being furnished to all regional offices. By this memorandum regional offices are asked to review the report and make suggestions for changes and additions. The information may be helpful in starting projects which will be required in the near future to meet states' water quality standards. Problem areas in one region may serve as reminders for future problem areas in other regions. The Reaeration Research Program Management Team is available to assist Bureau offices in solving problems caused by oxygen deficiency in reser- voirs, lakes, streams,-canals, and aquifers. The information in the report will also be used by other public agencies and private companies and individuals. The report includes survey-type information and does not reflect policy of the Bureau. i Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan SOIU-108 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The survey of reaeration needs on Bureau of Reclamation Projects was conducted in the Hydraulics Branch under the supervision of the Reaeration Research Program Management Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation, Runoff and Water Loss in the Lower Colorado River- Salton Sea Area by ALLEN G
    I Precipitation, Runoff and Water Loss in the Lower Colorado River- Salton Sea Area By ALLEN G. HELY and EUGENE L . PECK WATER RESOURCES OF LOWER COLORADO RIVER-SALTON SEA AREA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-B Prepared in collaboration with the U.S. Weather Bureau UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON :C '' ! I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L . UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B . Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows Hely, Allen Grant, 1908- Precipitation, runoff and water loss in the lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area, by Allen G . Hely and Eugene L . Peck. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. ili, 17 p. maps (7 fold ., 4 col ., in pocket) diagrs., table. s0 cm . (U .S . Geological Survey. Professional Paper 486-B) Water resources of lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area . Prepared in collaboration with the U .S . Weather Bureau . Bibliography : p. 16. (Continued on next card) Hely, Allen Grant, 1908- Precipitation, runoff and water loss in the lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area. 1964. (Card 2) 1. Water-supply-The West. I. Peck, Eugene Lincoln, 1=- Joint author. II. U.S. Weather Bureau. III. Title. IV . Title Lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area . (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D .C. 20402 i CONTENTS Page Page 1 Abstract B1 Runoff B6 i I Introduction I Methods used in estimating runoff 11 General description of the area 1 Reliability 14 Precipitation 2 Waterloss 15 Isohyetal maps 3 Evaporation 15 Variations in time 4 Evapotranspiration 16 Temperature 6 References 16 ILLUSTRATIONS (Plates are in pocket] PLATES 1-3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Capital in the Colorado River Basin
    NATURE’S VALUE IN THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN NATURE’S VALUE IN THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN JULY, 2014 AUTHORS David Batker, Zachary Christin, Corinne Cooley, Dr. William Graf, Dr. Kenneth Bruce Jones, Dr. John Loomis, James Pittman ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was commissioned by The Walton Family Foundation. Earth Economics would like to thank our project advisors for their invaluable contributions and expertise: Dr. Kenneth Bagstad of the United States Geological Survey, Dr. William Graf of the University of South Carolina, Dr. Kenneth Bruce Jones of the Desert Research Institute, and Dr. John Loomis of Colorado State University. We would like to thank our team of reviewers, which included Dr. Kenneth Bagstad, Jeff Mitchell, and Leah Mitchell. We would also like to thank our Board of Directors for their continued support and guidance: David Cosman, Josh Farley, and Ingrid Rasch. Earth Economics research team for this study included Cameron Otsuka, Jacob Gellman, Greg Schundler, Erica Stemple, Brianna Trafton, Martha Johnson, Johnny Mojica, and Neil Wagner. Cover and layout design by Angela Fletcher. The authors are responsible for the content of this report. PREPARED BY 107 N. Tacoma Ave Tacoma, WA 98403 253-539-4801 www.eartheconomics.org [email protected] ©2014 by Earth Economics. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. FUNDED BY EARTH ECONOMICS i ABSTRACT This study presents an economic characterization of the value of ecosystem services in the Colorado River Basin, a 249,000 square mile region spanning across mountains, plateaus, and low-lying valleys of the American Southwest.
    [Show full text]