DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Valid Values Reference Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Valid Values Reference Manual ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual . March, 2019 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Table A-1 Matrix .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Table A-2 Coord Geometric type .................................................................................................................. 7 Table A-3 Horizontal Collection Method ..................................................................................................... 7 Table A-4 Horizontal Accuracy Units .......................................................................................................... 8 Table A-5 Horizontal Datum ........................................................................................................................ 8 Table A-6 Elevation Collection Method ....................................................................................................... 8 Table A-7 Elevation Datum .......................................................................................................................... 9 Table A-8 Material ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Table A-9 Location Type ............................................................................................................................ 16 Table A-10 Qualifier ................................................................................................................................... 17 Table A-11 Result Type .............................................................................................................................. 19 Table A-12 Sample Type ............................................................................................................................ 19 Table A-13 Geologic Unit .......................................................................................................................... 20 Table A-14 Standard Preparation Method .................................................................................................. 23 Table A-15 Analyte ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Table A-16 Lab Analysis Method Name .................................................................................................. 166 Table A-17 Laboratory/ Subcontractor/ Company ............................................................................... 196 Table A-18 Unit ........................................................................................................................................ 208 Table A-19 Geology Soil Materials .......................................................................................................... 216 Table A-20 Well Segment and Materials .................................................................................................. 219 Table A-21 Basin- Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUC) .................................................................................. 220 Table A-22 EPA Facility IDs (EPA ID Code) .......................................................................................... 270 Table A-23 Total or Dissolved.................................................................................................................. 282 Table A-24 Test Type ............................................................................................................................... 282 Table A-25 Test Batch Type ..................................................................................................................... 282 Table A-26 Preservative ........................................................................................................................... 283 Table A-27-Point Parameter ..................................................................................................................... 283 TABLE A -28 STATE .................................................................................................................................... 283 Table A-29 Sample Method ...................................................................................................................... 284 Table A-30 Reference Point ...................................................................................................................... 286 Table A-31 Source Scale .......................................................................................................................... 287 LIST OF FIGURES Figure A-1 Monitoring Well Diagram ........................................................................................ 288 Figure A-2 Example of Geologic Units ...................................................................................... 289 EPA R5 EDD – Valid Value Reference Manual United States . Version 4.2 September 25, 2020 i Environmental Protection Agency Valid Values Reference Manual All tables presented within this Manual are also located in the EDD .pdf file available on the EPA Region 5 EDD website: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/region-5-superfund-electronic-data- submission Table A-1 Matrix Matrix_Code Descriptions AA AMBIENT AIR AC CRAWLSPACE (AIR) AD DRILLING AIR AE AIR, VAPOR EXTRACTIO N WELL EFFLUENT AI Indoor Air AO OUTDOOR AIR AQ AIR QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX AS SUB -SLAB (AIR) CA CINDER -ASH CF FLY ASH CINDER DC DRILL CUTTINGS GE GASEOUS EFFLUENT (STACK GAS) GL HEADSPACE OF LIQUID SAMPLE GS SOIL GAS LA AQUEOUS PHASE OF A MULTIP LE PHASE LIQUID OR SOLID SAMPLE LC LIQUID CONDENSATE LD DRILLING FLUID LE LIQUID EMULSION LF FLOATING/FREE PRODUCT ON GROUNDWATER TABLE LH FREE -FLOWING, OR LIQUID WASTE CONTAINING LESS THAN 0.5% DRY SOLIDS LM MULTIPLE PHASE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLE LO OR GANIC LIQUID LV LIQUID FROM VADOSE ZONE MH HAZARDOUS MULTIPLE PHASE WASTE OIL OIL SB BENTONITE SC CEMENT SD DRILL CUTTINGS, SOLID MATRIX SE SEDIMENT (ASSOCIATED WITH SURFACE WATER) SF FILTER SANDPACK SH SOLID WASTE CONTAINING GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.5% DRY SOLIDS SL SLUDGE SM WATER FILTER (SOLID MATERIAL USED TO FILTER WATER) SN MISCELLANEOUS SOLID MATERIALS - BUILDING MATERIALS SO SOIL SP CASING (PVC, STAINLESS STEEL, CAST IRON, IRON PIPING, ETC.) SQ SOIL/SOLID QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX SR WATER FILTER RESIDUE (SOLID THAT GETS FILTERED OUT OF WATER) SS SCRAPINGS ST SOLID WASTE SW SWAB OR WIPE TA ANIMAL TISSUE TP PLANT TISSUE TQ TISSUE QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX U UNKNOWN VW WATER VAPOR Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Version 4.2 United States ProtectionAgency March, 2019 - 5 - Table A-1 Matrix Matrix_Code Descriptions W WATER WA DRILL CUTTINGS, AQUEOUS MATRIX WC DRILLING WATER (USED FOR WELL CONSTRUCTION) WD WELL DEVELOPMENT WATER WE ESTUARY WG GROUND WATER WH EQUIPMENT WASH WATER, I.E., WATER USED FOR WASHING WL LEACHATE WO OCEAN WATER WP DRINKING WATER WPO POREWATER WQ WATER QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX WS SURFACE WATER WV WATER FROM VADOSE ZONE WW WASTE WATER WZ SPECIAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Version 4.2 United States ProtectionAgency March, 2019 - 6 - Table A-2 Coord Geometric type Geometric_type_code Description POINT GEOMETRIC TYPE Table A-3 Horizontal Collection Method Horiz_Collect_Method_Code Description A1 ADDRESS MATCHING -HOUSE NUMBER A2 ADDRESS MATCHING -BLOCK FACE A3 ADDRESS MATCHING -STREET CENTERLINE A4 ADDRESS MATCHING -NEAREST INTERSECTION A5 ADDRESS MATCHING -PRIMARY NAME A6 ADDRESS MATCHING -DIGITIZED AO ADDRESS MATCHING -OTHER C1 CENSUS BLOCK -1990 -CENTROID C2 CENSUS BLOCK/GROUP -1990 -CENTROID C3 CENSUS BLOCK TRACT -1990 -CENTROID CO CENSUS OTHER G0 GPS UNSPECIFIED GPS CARRIER PHASE STATIC RELATIVE – POSITIONING G1 TECHNIQUE GPS CARRIER PHASE KINEMATIC RELATIVE – POSITIONING G2 TECHNIQUE GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – G3 DIFFERENTIAL (DGPS) GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – PRECISE G4 POSITIONING SERVICE GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – STANDARD G5 POSITIONING SERVICE SA OFF GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – STANDARD G6 POSITIONING SERVICE SA ON I1 INTERPOLATION -MAP I2 INTERPOLATION -PHOTO I3 INTERPOLATION -SATELLITE IO INTERPOLATION -OTHER L1 LORAN P1 PUBLIC -LAND -SURVEY -QUARTERING P2 PUBLIC -LAND -SURVEY -FOOTING S1 CLASSICAL SURVEYING TECHNIQUES UN UNKNOWN Z1 ZIPCODE -CENTROID Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Version 4.2 United States ProtectionAgency March, 2019 - 7 - Table A-4 Horizontal Accuracy Units Horiz_Accuracy_Unit Description 1 DEGREES - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 2 MINUTES - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 3 SECONDS - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 4 METERS - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 5 FEET - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 6 KILOMETERS - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 7 MILES - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE Table A-5 Horizontal Datum Horiz_Datum_Code Description 1 NAD27 2 NAD83 O OTHER U UN KNOWN Table A-6 Elevation Collection Method Elev_Collect_Method_Code Description A1 ALTIMETRY GPS CARRIER PHASE STATIC RELATIVE POSITIONING G1 TECHNIQUE GPS CARRIER PHASE KINEMATIC RELATIVE POSITIONING G2 TECHNIQUE GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSEUDO RANGE) – DIFFERENTIAL G3 (DGPS) GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSEUDO RANGE) – PRECISE G4 POSITIONING
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3. Affected Environment Lower Sonoran/SDNM Draft RMP/EIS 253
    Chapter 3. Affected Environment Lower Sonoran/SDNM Draft RMP/EIS 253 3.1. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the environment within the Lower Sonoran Planning Area that would potentially be affected by actions proposed under the alternatives described in Chapter 2, Alternatives (p. 27). While the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is only responsible for managing BLM-administered public lands (public lands) within the Planning Area (i.e. the Lower Sonoran and Sonoran Desert National Monument [SDNM] Decision Areas), proposed decisions may affect environmental components outside the Decision Areas. Therefore, unless indicated otherwise, discussion and analysis in this section encompasses the Planning Area as a whole. The environmental components potentially impacted consist of resource and management activities listed below. The foreseeable environmental effects of the alternatives on these same resource and management activities are described in Chapter 4, Environmental Consequences (p. 371). Resources Resource Uses Air Quality Lands and Realty Cave Resources Livestock Grazing Management Climate Change Minerals Management Cultural and Heritage Resources Recreation Management Geology Travel Management Paleontological Resources Special Area Designations Priority Wildlife Species and Habitat Management National Landscape Conservation System Soil Resources Administrative Designations Vegetation Resources Other Special Designations Visual Resources Social and Economic Water Resources Tribal Interests Wild Horse & Burro Management Hazardous Materials and Public Safety Wilderness Characteristics Social and Economic Conditions Wildland Fire Management The data and descriptions of these categories are drawn from the Analysis of the Management Situation (AMS) (BLM 2005) and subsequent, completed resource assessments on several of the environmental components occurring within the Planning Area. The AMS is available for public review at the BLM’s Phoenix District Office.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA WATER ATLAS Volume 1 Executive Summary ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Arizona Department of Water Resources September 2010 ARIZONA WATER ATLAS Volume 1 Executive Summary ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Director, Arizona Department of Water Resources Herbert Guenther Deputy Director, Arizona Department of Water Resources Karen Smith Assistant Director, Hydrology Frank Corkhill Assistant Director, Water Management Sandra Fabritz-Whitney Atlas Team (Current and Former ADWR staff) Linda Stitzer, Rich Burtell – Project Managers Kelly Mott Lacroix - Asst. Project Manager Phyllis Andrews Carol Birks Joe Stuart Major Contributors (Current and Former ADWR staff) Tom Carr John Fortune Leslie Graser William H. Remick Saeid Tadayon-USGS Other Contributors (Current and Former ADWR staff) Matt Beversdorf Patrick Brand Roberto Chavez Jenna Gillis Laura Grignano (Volume 8) Sharon Morris Pam Nagel (Volume 8) Mark Preszler Kenneth Seasholes (Volume 8) Jeff Tannler (Volume 8) Larri Tearman Dianne Yunker Climate Gregg Garfin - CLIMAS, University of Arizona Ben Crawford - CLIMAS, University of Arizona Casey Thornbrugh - CLIMAS, University of Arizona Michael Crimmins – Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona The Atlas is wide in scope and it is not possible to mention all those who helped at some time in its production, both inside and outside the Department. Our sincere thanks to those who willingly provided data and information, editorial review, production support and other help during this multi-year project. Arizona Water Atlas Volume 1 CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 Atlas Purpose and Scope 1 SECTION 1.1 Atlas
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation, Runoff and Water Loss in the Lower Colorado River- Salton Sea Area by ALLEN G
    I Precipitation, Runoff and Water Loss in the Lower Colorado River- Salton Sea Area By ALLEN G. HELY and EUGENE L . PECK WATER RESOURCES OF LOWER COLORADO RIVER-SALTON SEA AREA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-B Prepared in collaboration with the U.S. Weather Bureau UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON :C '' ! I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L . UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B . Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows Hely, Allen Grant, 1908- Precipitation, runoff and water loss in the lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area, by Allen G . Hely and Eugene L . Peck. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. ili, 17 p. maps (7 fold ., 4 col ., in pocket) diagrs., table. s0 cm . (U .S . Geological Survey. Professional Paper 486-B) Water resources of lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area . Prepared in collaboration with the U .S . Weather Bureau . Bibliography : p. 16. (Continued on next card) Hely, Allen Grant, 1908- Precipitation, runoff and water loss in the lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area. 1964. (Card 2) 1. Water-supply-The West. I. Peck, Eugene Lincoln, 1=- Joint author. II. U.S. Weather Bureau. III. Title. IV . Title Lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area . (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D .C. 20402 i CONTENTS Page Page 1 Abstract B1 Runoff B6 i I Introduction I Methods used in estimating runoff 11 General description of the area 1 Reliability 14 Precipitation 2 Waterloss 15 Isohyetal maps 3 Evaporation 15 Variations in time 4 Evapotranspiration 16 Temperature 6 References 16 ILLUSTRATIONS (Plates are in pocket] PLATES 1-3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions by Employer
    2/4/2019 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT HOME / CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTS AND DATA / PRESIDENTIAL REPORTS / 2008 APRIL MONTHLY / REPORT FOR C00431569 / CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT PO Box 101436 Arlington, Virginia 22210 FEC Committee ID #: C00431569 This report contains activity for a Primary Election Report type: April Monthly This Report is an Amendment Filed 05/22/2008 EMPLOYER SUM NO EMPLOYER WAS SUPPLIED 6,724,037.59 (N,P) ENERGY, INC. 800.00 (SELF) 500.00 (SELF) DOUGLASS & ASSOCI 200.00 - 175.00 1)SAN FRANCISCO PARATRAN 10.50 1-800-FLOWERS.COM 10.00 101 CASINO 187.65 115 R&P BEER 50.00 1199 NATIONAL BENEFIT FU 120.00 1199 SEIU 210.00 1199SEIU BENEFIT FUNDS 45.00 11I NETWORKS INC 500.00 11TH HOUR PRODUCTIONS, L 250.00 1291/2 JAZZ GRILLE 400.00 15 WEST REALTY ASSOCIATES 250.00 1730 CORP. 140.00 1800FLOWERS.COM 100.00 1ST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL 210.00 20 CENTURY FOX TELEVISIO 150.00 20TH CENTURY FOX 250.00 20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CO 50.00 20TH TELEVISION (FOX) 349.15 21ST CENTURY 100.00 24 SEVEN INC 500.00 24SEVEN INC 100.00 3 KIDS TICKETS INC 121.00 3 VILLAGE CENTRAL SCHOOL 250.00 3000BC 205.00 312 WEST 58TH CORP 2,000.00 321 MANAGEMENT 150.00 321 THEATRICAL MGT 100.00 http://docquery.fec.gov/pres/2008/M4/C00431569/A_EMPLOYER_C00431569.html 1/336 2/4/2019 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT 333 WEST END TENANTS COR 100.00 360 PICTURES 150.00 3B MANUFACTURING 70.00 3D INVESTMENTS 50.00 3D LEADERSHIP, LLC 50.00 3H TECHNOLOGY 100.00 3M 629.18 3M COMPANY 550.00 4-C (SOCIAL SERVICE AGEN 100.00 402EIGHT AVE CORP 2,500.00 47 PICTURES, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior U.S
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE REGION 2 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS EFFECT S OF MILITARY AIRCRAFT CHAFF ON WATER SOURCES AVAILABLE TO SONORAN PRONGHORN Carrie H. Marr Anthony L. Velasco April 2005 Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 W. Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 Under Cooperative Agreement N68711-02-LT-00030 For the U.S. Department of Navy Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command 1220 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92132-5190 W:\Carrie Marr\Chaff StudyContract\Final chaff report.doc ABSTRACT While the federally endangered Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americana sonoriensis) population has plummeted on the Barry M. Goldwater Range in southwestern Arizona, biologists have questioned some range activities that may increase risk potential to the pronghorn. Sonoran pronghorn on the Barry M. Goldwater Range in southwestern Arizona are exposed to military radio-frequency chaff that is used by aircraft during training exercises. Chaff are fibrous, glass strands coated with metallic aluminum that disrupt an enemy’s radar; strands also were coated (historically) with a strip of lead to increase flutter [performance]. Considering the amount of chaff released over the last 50+ years, and the metals used on the chaff fibers, the risk potential to Sonoran pronghorn was high enough to warrant investigation. Sonoran pronghorn population levels are so low that the any additional stress placed upon species could be detrimental to the existence of the species. As a result, we studied Sonoran pronghorn oral exposure to chaff on the Barry M. Goldwater Range, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, Organ Pipe National Monument, and Luke Air Force Range (herein these properties are referred to collectively as BMGR), and Kofa National Wildlife Refuge (KNWR) as a reference site.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks, Monuments, and Historical Landmarks Visited
    National Parks, Monuments, and Historical Landmarks Visited Abraham Lincoln Birthplace, KY Casa Grande Ruins National Monument, AZ Acadia National Park, ME Castillo de San Marcos, FL Adirondack Park Historical Landmark, NY Castle Clinton National Monument, NY Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument, TX Cedar Breaks National Monument, UT Agua Fria National Monument, AZ Central Park Historical Landmark, NY American Stock Exchange Historical Landmark, NY Chattahoochie River Recreation Area, GA Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest, CA Chattanooga National Military Park, TN Angel Mounds Historical Landmark, IN Chichamauga National Military Park, TN Appalachian National Scenic Trail, NJ & NY Chimney Rock National Monument, CO Arkansan Post Memorial, AR Chiricahua National Monument, CO Arches National Park, UT Chrysler Building Historical Landmark, NY Assateague Island National Seashore, Berlin, MD Cole’s Hill Historical Landmark, MA Aztec Ruins National Monument, AZ Colorado National Monument, CO Badlands National Park, SD Congaree National Park, SC Bandelier National Monument, NM Constitution Historical Landmark, MA Banff National Park, AB, Canada Crater Lake National Park, OR Big Bend National Park, TX Craters of the Moon National Monument, ID Biscayne National Park, FL Cuyahoga Valley National Park, OH Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park, CO Death Valley National Park, CA & NV Blue Ridge, PW Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, NJ & PA Bonneville Salt Flats, UT Denali (Mount McKinley) National Park. AK Boston Naval Shipyard Historical
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Study for the Gila River Below Painted Rock Dam
    c/ ' » ; ' .-/ ¿¡feTT^/S'/'73 ;:i C^*i' 1 M ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY ■ -4 FOR THE M GILA RIVER M BELOW PAINTED ROCK DAM M ■ :s •J By '4 ■4 University of Arizona ■ it School of Earth Sciences Office of Arid Lands Studies TD 194.56 .A6 P356 1970 |ii,t i,Bjp j i i | M I .....-rr/M m i1 r . w 1 1 IMI "" t I -"ai ion vtKv A d V \ ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR THE GILA RIVER BELOW PAINTED ROCK DAM Under Contract with Department of the Army Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers Contract Number DACW09-70-C-0079 by University of Arizona School of Earth Sciences Office of Arid Lands Studies Y ¡11 October 1970 Bureau 01 Ru:!s; nc it! on Derwui, Uolorao10 The Gila River at the Dome Gaging Station. Photograph taken December 23, 1930 by U.S.G.S. Matched photograph taken June 23, 1970 by Office of Arid Lands Studies. Significant changes include considerably more sur­ face water and heavy salt cedar growth, apparently a result of heavy irrigation runoff and perhaps the close proximity of bed­ rock to the surface. The line of young cottonwoods (center) has disappeared. CONTENTS «»•«»»••»»•••si« -«-wit* ilij ■_ j o*> ' r ■ .. \ t > . ' P FRONTISPIECE............... iSi FIGURES .... ... .................. • * i* TABLES ...................... ............ xi ABSTRACT ........................................... • • • xiii INTRODUCTION............................... 1 Location and Extent . .......... ............ 1 Authority ........ .................... 1 Object and Scope of Study ....•••••«••••»••» 1 General Organization and Procedures ............ ..... 2 SURVEY AND INVENTORY .......................... 2 Geology, Landforms, and Surficial Deposits ....... .... 2 Structure, Earthquakes, and Economic Geology ....... 4 Channel Characteristics of the Lower Gila River ....... 4 Characteristics of the Major Tributary Washes...........
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin
    Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 579 Washington J 968 United States Department of the Interior STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary Geological Survey William T. Pecora, Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth INTRODUCTION This report lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the Colorado River basin for which records have been or are to bepublishedinreportsoftheGeological Survey for periods through September 30, 1967. It supersedes Geobgical Survey Circular 509. Basic data on surface-water supply have been published in an annual series of water-supply papers consisting of several volumes, including one each for the States of Alaska and Hawaii. The area of the other 48 States is divided into 14 parts whose boundaries coincide with certain natural drainage lines. Prior to 1951, the records for the 48 States were published in 14 volumes, one for each of the parts. From 1951 to 1960, the records for the 48 States were pub~.ished annually in 18 volumes, there being 2 volumes each for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 6. The boundaries of the various parts are shown on the map in figure 1. Beginning in 1961, the annual series ofwater-supplypapers on surface-water supply was changed to a 5-year S<~ries. Records for the period 1961-65 will bepublishedin a series of water-supply papers using the same 14-part division for the 48 States, but most parts will be further subdivided into two or more volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL PARK Location Map No. 6 Southwestern States
    NATIONAL PARK Location Map No. 6 Southwestern States The Grand Canyon United States Department of the Interior Harold L. Ickes, Secretary National Park Service, Newton B. Drury, Director Guide To Your Parks INTRODUCING THE NATIONAL PARK i be Great Organ—Capitol Reef SYSTEM National Monument Under the direction of the super­ • OUR NATION'S HERITAGE includes intendent or custodian are uni­ vast natural resources of superb formed rangers, whose duties are to scenic and scientific value. It in­ protect the areas from fire, van­ cludes the customs and traditions dalism, and other damage, and to sandstone Formations in Colorado National Monument The Double Arch—Arches National Monument Balanced Rocks at Chiricahua National Monument Sliding on the Sands—White Sands brought to our shores by people from provide information and assistance National Monument the Old World, and the native In­ to the visitor. Region Three, National Park Serv­ covered ancient Indian dwellings MENT, affording additional striking BRYCE CANYON NATIONAL PARK, colored. The Virgin River which dian culture which was already ice, Box 1728, Santa Fe, N. Mex. determined by the tree-ring method views. lying in the desert country of south­ flows through the canyon carries here. It includes the memories, to have been built in 860 A.D. Interpretive Service BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK, in western Utah, is a fine example of away each year 3,000,000 tons of associations, and relics of great The Great White Throne-Zion water erosion. Its great amphi­ events in our history. All told, it is National Park CAPULIN MOUNTAIN NATIONAL western Texas, is a country of strik­ rock in the form of fine debris.
    [Show full text]
  • Codes for the Identification of Hydrologic Units in the United States and the Caribbean Outlying Areas Date of Approval: July 1981 Maintenance Organization: U.S
    A U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DATA STANDARD This report describes one of a series of data standards adopted and im¬ plemented by the U.S. Geological Survey for the standardization of data elements and representations used in automated Earth-science systems. Earth sciences are those scientific disciplines especially required to carry out the mission of the Geological Survey and are concerned with the material and morphology of the Earth and physical forces relating to the Earth. These disciplines include geology, topography, geography, and hydrology. The Geological Survey has assumed the leadership in developing and main¬ taining Earth-science data element and representation standards for use in the Federal establishment under the terms of a Memorandum of Understand¬ ing signed in February 1980 by the National Bureau of Standards of the Department of Commerce and the Geological Survey, a Bureau of the Depart¬ ment of the Interior. As such, in addition to developing and maintaining standards, the Geological Survey reviews and processes all requests referred by the National Bureau of Standards for exceptions, deferments, and revi¬ sion of standards applicable to Federal Earth-science information systems; assists the National Bureau of Standards in assessing the need, impact, benefits, and problems related to the implementation of standards being con¬ sidered for development, or developed, for use in the Earth sciences; and works with other agencies in developing new data standards in the Earth sciences. The standard described in this report has been specifically approved for use within the U.S. Geological Survey. If the standard has been approved for use throughout the Federal establishment, it is also published by the National Bureau of Standards as a Federal Information Processing Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS of the MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES on INTERPRETATIONS of MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY by E
    A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETATIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY By ERIC DAVID SINGLETON Bachelor of Arts/Science in History The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2003 Master of Arts/Science in Museum Studies The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2008 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2017 A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY Dissertation Approved: Dr. L.G. Moses Dr. William S. Bryans Dr. Michael M. Smith Dr. F. Kent Reilly, III Dr. Stephen M. Perkins ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is true that nothing in this world is done alone. I would like to thank my family and friends for all their love and support. My grandparents, parents, sister, cousin, aunts and uncles. They were the foundation of everything that has shaped my life and allowed me the strength to complete this while working full-time. And, to my fiancée Kimberly. I mention her separately, not because she is not included above, but because she is the one person who diligently edited, listened, and gracefully sat by giving up years of vacations, holidays, and parties as I spent countless nights quietly writing. I would also give the most heartfelt thank you to Dr. Moses, Dr. McCoy, and Dr. Smith. Each of you made me the historian I am today. As Dr. James Ronda told me once, pick your professors, not the school—they will shape everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual . March, 2019 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Table A-1 Matrix .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Table A-2 Coord Geometric type .................................................................................................................. 7 Table A-3 Horizontal Collection Method ..................................................................................................... 7 Table A-4 Horizontal Accuracy Units .......................................................................................................... 8 Table A-5 Horizontal Datum ........................................................................................................................ 8 Table A-6 Elevation Collection Method ....................................................................................................... 8 Table A-7 Elevation Datum .......................................................................................................................... 9 Table A-8 Material ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Table
    [Show full text]