(1758–2021) (Acari: Trombiculoidea), with Notes on Nomenclature, Taxonomy, and Distribution (Zootaxa 4967) 243 Pp.; 30 Cm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(1758–2021) (Acari: Trombiculoidea), with Notes on Nomenclature, Taxonomy, and Distribution (Zootaxa 4967) 243 Pp.; 30 Cm Zootaxa 4967 (1): 001–243 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4967.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:96B0632C-788A-493A-AA42-A237973EBF48 ZOOTAXA 4967 Annotated world checklist of the Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae (1758– 2021) (Acari: Trombiculoidea), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy, and distribution DAVID H. NIELSEN1, RICHARD G. ROBBINS2 & LEOPOLDO M. RUEDA3 1Nebraska Department of Agriculture, 301 Centennial Mall South, Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 USA. �[email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-4424 2 Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, MSC, MRC 534, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746 USA, and Department of Entomology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, USA. �[email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2443-5271 3Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, MSC, MRC 534, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746 USA, and Department of Entomology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, USA. Mailing address: 204 Draymore Way, Cary, North Carolina 27519, USA �[email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-2857 Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by O. Seeman: 24 Feb. 2021; published: 7 May 2021 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-N.C. 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ DAVID H. NIELSEN, RICHARD G. ROBBINS & LEOPOLDO M. RUEDA Annotated world checklist of the Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae (1758–2021) (Acari: Trombiculoidea), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy, and distribution (Zootaxa 4967) 243 pp.; 30 cm. 7 May 2021 ISBN 978-1-77688-250-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77688-251-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2021 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1041 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] https://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 4967 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press NIELSEN ET AL. Table of Contents Abstract . 3 Introduction . 3 Approach . 4 Scope . 5 Future prospects. 7 Acknowledgements. 194 References. 195 Abstract The superfamily Trombiculoidea is a large and diverse group of acarines that comprises six families; of these, the families Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae are characterized by larvae commonly known as chiggers that are parasites of terrestrial vertebrates, including humans, and some species are of medical importance as vectors of chigger-borne rickettsiosis (scrub typhus), caused by the rickettsia Orientia tsutsugamushi. This paper presents an annotated checklist of 3,013 generally accepted chigger species, together with their distribution by zoogeographic region, and a non-comprehensive list of synonyms. A total of 58 new combinations are proposed by transferring species to different genera, treating some subgenera as genera, or updating current generic names. The checklist updates earlier catalogs of the world chigger fauna, but because the literature on chigger taxonomy is voluminous and scattered, similar, regional monographs were utilized in constructing the classificatory foundation. This list may not contain every species, synonym or taxonomic rearrangement that has been published, but it reflects the most recent arrangement of chigger taxa. Distribution records are primarily drawn from collection sites listed in the original species descriptions, together with subsequently published geographical records. Key words: checklist, chigger mites, Trombiculoidea, taxonomy, biogeography Introduction The superfamily Trombiculoidea is a large and diverse group of mites. Its fundamental classification has occasionally been changed by several acarologists, particulary the arrangement of recognized superfamilies, families, subfamilies, tribes, genera and subgenera. To cite a few examples, Krantz (1978) noted that in addition to the family Chyzeridae, Vercammen-Grandjean (1973) recognized 8 families within what he referred to as the Trombidioidea, namely: Trombellidae, Johnstonianidae, Neotrombidiidae, Stygothrombiidae, Podothrombiidae, Trombidiidae, Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae. Zhang et al. (2011), however, revised the classification of what is now called the Trombiculoidea and listed seven families: Trombellidae, Johnstonianidae, Neotrombidiidae, Audyanidae, Trombiculidae, Walchiidae, and Leeuwenhoekiidae. Larvae of the families Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae, commonly known as chiggers, have been associated with human discomfort through their bite or through transmission of disease organisms (Audy 1968), but little was known about them until the early 20th century. The first chigger to receive a formal scientific name was Acarus batatas Linnaeus, now known as Eutrombicula batatas (Linnaeus) (Michener 1946). In 1912, Oudemans and Berlese separately published monographs containing a total of 33 known species, but until the outbreak of World War II, most studies on trombiculid taxonomy, ecology and disease relationships were conducted by Walch (1922-1927) in Europe and the Netherlands East Indies, Kawamura and Ikeda (1936) in Japan, and Ewing (1913-1937) in North America. During his long career, Ewing (active 1913-1950) described 64 new chigger species, 16 new genera, and two subfamilies, the Trombiculinae and Walchiinae. Ewing’s work in the 1920s and 1930s established a classificatory framework for chigger genera that became the foundation of modern chigger taxonomy. Propelled by studies of chigger-borne rickettsiosis (scrub typhus, tsutsugamushi disease) in Southeast Asia and the western Pacific during World War II, the post-war era saw an explosion of trombiculid mite research, resulting in great numbers of new genera and species. In 1952, Wharton and Fuller published “A Manual of the Chiggers,” a worldwide review that included four subfamilies, 31 genera, 17 subgenera, and 440 species. This work also summarized valuable data on species distribution and host preferences. Concurrently, Womersley (1952) published his voluminous monograph, “The Scrub-Typhus and Scrub Itch Mites CHECKLIST OF THE TROMBICULIDAE AND LEEUWENHOEKIIDAE Zootaxa 4967 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 3 (Trombiculidae, Acarina) of the Asiatic-Pacific Region,” which described some 260 species, 75 of them new. This work was soon revised by Audy (1957), who also published a checklist of trombiculid mites of the Oriental and Australasian Regions. In 1968, Audy published a series of his lectures on chigger-borne rickettsiosis, the only major human disease associated with chiggers, in a book entitled “Red Mites and Typhus.” From the 1960s through the 1980s, Domrow conducted research on Australasian chigger taxonomy, while Vercammen-Grandjean, starting in the 1950s, began studying the trombiculid mites of Africa. During the 1960s and 1970s, Vercammen-Grandjean emerged as one of the most prolific chigger taxonomists of all time, describing more than 50 genera and 370 species with colleagues around the world. He also proposed a number of fundamental changes in chigger classification, including the creation of tribes within subfamilies, the tribes being further divided into complexes where genera were grouped based on combinations of characters. In 1971, Vercammen-Grandjean and Langston launched a monumental program to catalog the world chigger fauna. In a projected series of volumes entitled “The Chigger Mites of the World,” they endeavored to illustrate all accepted chigger species, together with known locality and host data. Unfortunately, only two volumes, the Leptotrombidium complex (volume III), published in 1976, and the Guntherana complex (volume VIII), published in 1971, were ultimately completed. While significant portions of Vercammen-Grandjean’s oeuvre are now disputed, his contributions to the study of trombiculoid mites continue to influence researchers. The 1960s and 1970s saw a number of other major publications addressing chigger taxonomy, particularly at the regional level. During the 1960s Brennan and collaborators published numerous papers on the chiggers of South America, bringing attention to a part of the world that had gone largely unstudied. Brennan’s work (1946-1982) still stands as the foundation for chigger taxonomy in the Neotropical region. A 1974 study by Nadchatram and Dohany provided diagnoses of all the chigger genera then known from Southeast Asia, as well as a classificatory arrangement that is still widely accepted. The late 1960s witnessed the first of many publications by the Russian acarologist Kudryashova, followed a decade later by the first publications by Goff; between them, they described almost 300 new species and multiple genera. Both authors also focused on refining the genus- level classification of chiggers. Goff, Loomis and Wrenn (1986) published a chigger bibliography, and Goff et al. (1983-1989) comprehensively defined the terms used in chigger taxonomy, setting a universal standard for chigger morphology. Kudryashova’s research (1965-2011) remains central to studies of chiggers in Russia and the Palearctic Region. More recent research by Stekolnikov (1992-2021) and a multitude of collaborators has expanded upon this base, yielding an understanding of chigger diversity in that part of the world, as well as Africa and Cuba. In 1984, Wen published “The
Recommended publications
  • EJT-17-10 Stekolnikov
    © European Journal of Taxonomy; download unter http://www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu; www.zobodat.at European Journal of Taxonomy 395: 1–233 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.395 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Stekolnikov A.A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A244F97F-8CEB-40CE-A182-7E5440337CAA Taxonomy and distribution of African chiggers (Acariformes, Trombiculidae) Alexandr A. STEKOLNIKOV Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya embankment 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:576D9065-0E85-4C5C-B00F-B907E3005B95 Abstract. Chigger mites of the African continent are reviewed using data acquired from the literature and examination of the collections deposited at the Royal Museum for Central Africa (Tervuren, Belgium) and the Natural History Museum (London, UK). All fi ndings for 443 valid chigger species belonging to 61 genera are reported, along with details on their collection locality and host species. Three new synonyms are proposed: Straelensia Vercammen-Grandjean & Kolebinova, 1968 (= Anasuscuta Brown, 2009 syn. nov.); Herpetacarus (Herpetacarus) Vercammen-Grandjean, 1960 (= Herpetacarus (Lukoschuskaaia) Kolebinova & Vercammen-Grandjean, 1980 syn. nov.); Gahrliepia brennani (Jadin & Vercammen-Grandjean, 1952) (= Gahrliepia traubi Audy, Lawrence & Vercammen-Grandjean, 1961 syn. nov.). A new replacement name is proposed: Microtrombicula squirreli Stekolnikov, 2017 nom. nov. pro Eltonella myonacis heliosciuri Vercammen-Grandjean, 1965 (praeocc. Vercammen-Grandjean, 1965). Ninety new combinations are proposed. Keys to subfamilies, genera and subgenera of African trombiculid larvae and diagnoses of these taxa are given. Keywords. Chigger mites, fauna, taxonomy, Africa. Stekolnikov A.A. 2018. Taxonomy and distribution of African chiggers (Acariformes, Trombiculidae).
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders and Their Relatives Compiled By
    A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie 1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Christian Bartel, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2017. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch, version 18.0, accessed on {date of access}. Last updated: 04.01.2017 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current World Spider Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. For an overview see Dunlop & Penney (2012). Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the previous Platnick Catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Actinedida No
    17 (3) · 2017 Russell, D. & K. Franke Actinedida No. 16 ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 – 37 Acarological literature .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Publications 2017 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Publications 2016 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Publications, additions 2015 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Publications, additions 2014 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Publications, additions 2013 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Publications, additions 2012 ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites
    1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 11.0 American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 11.06.2010 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Platnick Catalog. For this reason some of the family groups proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Ecology of Parasitic Chigger Mites (Acari
    Taxonomy and ecology of parasitic chigger mites (Acari: Trombiculidae) on small mammals in South Africa by Karlien Malan Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Science in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr S. Matthee Co-supervisor: Professor M.L. Goff March 2015 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis/dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Some of the contents contained in this thesis (Chapters 2-5) are taken directly from manuscripts submitted or drafted for publication in the primary scientific literature. This resulted in some overlap in content between the chapters. Copyright © 2015 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people. Professor Lee Goff who came all the way from Hawaii to help with the identification of the chigger species collected during the study. It was a great privelage to be able to learn from Professor. Professor Eddie Ueckermann for helping with the species descriptions and guidance throughout the study. Doctor Sonja Matthee for all her support, guidance and inspiration during my MSc. It was an honour to have such a great supervisor and mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Studies of Trombidioid Mites
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “ target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)” . I f it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they arc spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of cither blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent' frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin film ing at the upper left hand corner o f a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. I f necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence
    Persian J. Acarol., 2021, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 231–233. https://doi.org/10.22073/pja.v10i2.66445 Journal homepage: http://www.biotaxa.org/pja Correspondence Remarks on Birjandtrombella Noei, 2020 (Acari: Trombidiformes: Prostigmata) Javad Noei Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran; E-mail: noei.javad@ birjand.ac.ir PAPER INFO.: Received: 5 January 2021, Accepted: 31 January 2021, Published: 15 April 2021 Birjandtrombella farniae Noei, 2020, originally placed in Trombellidae Thor, 1935, was described from larvae ectoparasitic on moths, from Birjand city, South Khorasan province, Iran (Noei and Rabieh 2020). According to Mąkol and Wohltmann (2012, 2013) the family Neotrombidiidae Feider, 1955 consists of four genera: Discotrombidium Feider, 1977, Monunguis Wharton, 1938, Neotrombidium Leonardi, 1901 and Anomalothrombium André, 1936. Discotrombidium and Anomalothrombium are based on post-larval forms only, the monotypic genus Monunguis (parasitic on bat flies, Streblidae) is based on larva only (Womersley 1963; Lindquist and Vercammen-Grandjean 1971) and Neotrombidium (parasitic on subcortical beetles of the families Cerambycidae, Cleridae, Elateridae and Tenebrionidae, and on the ground beetle family Carabidae) is based on both larval and post-larval forms (Noei et al. 2017). The family Neotrombidiidae and Trombellidae can be distinguished by the number of normal setae on femur I (7 vs. with less than seven normal setae in Trombellidae) and reticulated area on coxae I and III (present vs. absent). In this paper, the monotypic genus Birjandtrombella Noei, 2020 (parasitic on Lepidoptera: Crambidae, Noctuidae, Pyralidae) is transferred from Trombellidae to the family Neotrombidiidae and the generic diagnosis is amended. The modified drawing of the Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitic and Phoretic Mites of Diptera in Israel and the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Vol. 40, 2010, pp. 195–203 Parasitic and phoretic mites of Diptera in Israel and the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt KOSTA Y. MUMCUOGLU1 AND YEHUDA BRAVERMAN2 1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The Kuvin Center for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, The Institute for Medical Research Israel— Canada, The Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. E-mail: [email protected] 2Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel ABSTRACT Certain mites (Acarina) are parasitic on insects and other arthropods or use them as a means for transport to habitats where they find more suitable en- vironmental conditions. This article reports on phoretic and parasitic mites collected from Diptera in Israel and Egypt. Flies from the families Muscidae, Ceratopogonidae, Sphaeroceridae, Milichiidae, Sepsidae, and Ulidiidae were collected in the periphery of cowsheds and horse stables using Williams fi- berglass panel (Alsynite), Monks Wood, and DuToit suction traps. Specimens of the housefly (Musca domestica) and of the stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans) were infested mainly by Macrocheles muscaedomesticae, and to a lesser extent, by Macrocheles subbadius, trombiculid larvae, and Dendrolaelaps nymphs. Most Culicoides species (Ceratopogonidae) were infested by water- mite larvae of the families Limnesiidae, Thyasidae, and Arrenuridae, as well as by larvae of the terrestrial Trombidiidae and Neotrombidiidae, whereas representatives of the remaining dipteran families were infested mainly by astigmatid, prostigmatid, and mesostigmatid mites. KEYWORDS: Acari, mite, insect, parasite, phoresis, Diptera, Israel INTRODUCTION Mites are known to parasitize vertebrates as well as insects and other arthropods. The larvae of several species of water mites are ectoparasites of adult mosquitoes and midges, the majority of which belong to the genera Thyas (Thyasidae) and Arrenurus (Arrenuridae).
    [Show full text]
  • The Seasonality, Diversity and Ecology of Cavernicolous Guano Dependent Arthropod Ecosystems in Southern Australia
    The seasonality, diversity and ecology of cavernicolous guano dependent arthropod ecosystems in southern Australia. Timothy A. Moulds A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Environmental Biology School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia January 2006 DECLARATION This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being available for loan and photocopying. Timothy Moulds ii Table of Contents Declaration ......................................................................................................................ii Table of Contents...........................................................................................................iii Index of Figures ............................................................................................................vii Index of Tables.............................................................................................................xiv Index of Tables.............................................................................................................xiv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................xvii
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Dynamics of Microarthropods from Different Biotopes of Las Sardinas Cave (Mexico)
    Subterranean Biology 9: 113-126, 2011 Microarthropods in Sardinas Cave 113 doi: 10.3897/subtbiol.9.2514 Diversity and dynamics of microarthropods from different biotopes of Las Sardinas cave (Mexico) José G. PALACIOS-VARGAS*, Gabriela CASTAÑO-MENESES, Daniel A. ESTRADA Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos. Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Na- cional Autónoma de México. 04510 México, D. F. e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], biodan@ hotmail.com * corresponding author ABSTRACT An ecological study of the microarthropod communities from Las Sardinas cave was undertaken. Four different biotopes were stud- ied over the course of a year: bat guano, litter, soil under the chemoautotrophic bacteria colonies and as a control, plain soil without litter or guano. A total of 27,913 specimens of a total of 169 species were collected. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed that there is a significant effect of biotope on the recorded density, and the post hoc Tukey’s test showed that guano is the most differ- ent biotope with the highest value of density recorded. The interaction between season and biotope variables was not significant. In the most extreme case, 99 percent of the microarthropods in soil under chemoautotrophic bacteria were mites, mainly in the family Histiostomidae. Key words: Cave communities, distribution, energy fluxes, food resources, microarthropods INTRODUCTION tation through the microcaves of the superficial environ- ment, and the movement of carbon from the soil to the Caves are environments with relatively stable cli- superficial subterranean environment (Gers 1998). The matic conditions, compared to those outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Distribution of African Chiggers (Acariformes, Trombiculidae)
    European Journal of Taxonomy 395: 1–233 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.395 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Stekolnikov A.A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A244F97F-8CEB-40CE-A182-7E5440337CAA Taxonomy and distribution of African chiggers (Acariformes, Trombiculidae) Alexandr A. STEKOLNIKOV Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya embankment 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:576D9065-0E85-4C5C-B00F-B907E3005B95 Abstract. Chigger mites of the African continent are reviewed using data acquired from the literature and examination of the collections deposited at the Royal Museum for Central Africa (Tervuren, Belgium) and the Natural History Museum (London, UK). All findings for 443 valid chigger species belonging to 61 genera are reported, along with details on their collection locality and host species. Three new synonyms are proposed: Straelensia Vercammen-Grandjean & Kolebinova, 1968 (= Anasuscuta Brown, 2009 syn. nov.); Herpetacarus (Herpetacarus) Vercammen-Grandjean, 1960 (= Herpetacarus (Lukoschuskaaia) Kolebinova & Vercammen-Grandjean, 1980 syn. nov.); Gahrliepia brennani (Jadin & Vercammen-Grandjean, 1952) (= Gahrliepia traubi Audy, Lawrence & Vercammen-Grandjean, 1961 syn. nov.). A new replacement name is proposed: Microtrombicula squirreli Stekolnikov, 2017 nom. nov. pro Eltonella myonacis heliosciuri Vercammen-Grandjean, 1965 (praeocc. Vercammen-Grandjean, 1965). Ninety new combinations are proposed. Keys to subfamilies, genera and subgenera of African trombiculid larvae and diagnoses of these taxa are given. Keywords. Chigger mites, fauna, taxonomy, Africa. Stekolnikov A.A. 2018. Taxonomy and distribution of African chiggers (Acariformes, Trombiculidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 395: 1–233.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Trombidiformes Reuter, 1909. In: Zhang, Z.-Q
    Order Trombidiformes Reuter, 19091, 2 Suborder Sphaerolichida OConnor, 1984 (2 superfamilies)3 Superfamily Lordalychoidea Grandjean, 1939 (2 families) Family Lordalychidae Grandjean, 1939 (1 genus, 16 species) Superfamily Sphaerolichoidea Berlese, 1913 Family Sphaerolichidae Berlese, 1913 (1 genus, 5 species) Suborder Prostigmata Kramer, 1877 (4 infraorders, 40 superfamilies) Infraorder Labidostommatina Krantz, 1978 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Labidostommatoidea Oudemans, 1904 (1 family) Family Labidostommatidae Oudemans, 1904 (5 genera, 51 species; †0/2)4 Infraorder Eupodina Krantz, 1978 (5 superfamilies) Superfamily Bdelloidea Dugès, 1834 (2 families) Family Bdellidae Dugès, 1834 (15 genera, 256 Species; †0/5)5 Family Cunaxidae Thor, 1902 (27 genera, 329 species)6 Superfamily Eriophyoidea Nalepa, 1898 (3 families)7 Family Phytoptidae Murray, 1877 (20 genera, 164 species)8 Family Eriophyidae Nalepa, 1898 (274 genera, 3,790 species)9 Family Diptilomiopidae Keifer, 1944 (63 genera, 450 species) Superfamily Eupodoidea Koch, 1842 (9 families)10 Family Cocceupodidae Jesionowska, 2010 (3 genera, 23 species)11 Family Eupodidae Koch, 1842 (10 genera, 69 species)12 Family Dendrochaetidae Olivier, 2008 (1 genus, 1 species)13 Family Eriorhynchidae Qin & Halliday, 1997 (1 genus, 5 species) Family Pentapalpidae Olivier & Theron, 2000 (1 genus, 1 species) Family Penthaleidae Oudemans, 1931 (5 genera, 16 species)14 Family Penthalodidae Thor, 1933 (6 genera, 35 species; ; †0/1)15 Family Rhagidiidae Oudemans, 1922 (28 genera, 157 species; ; †1/1) Family Strandtmanniidae Zacharda, 1979 (1 genus, 2 species)16 1. BY Zhi-Qiang Zhang, Qing-Hai Fan, Vladimir Pesic, Harry Smit, Andre V. Bochkov, A. A. Khaustov, Anne Baker, Andreas Wohltmann, Tinghuan Wen, James W. Amrine, P. Beron, Jianzhen Lin, Grzegorz Gabrys & Robert Husband (for full auhor addresses, see Contributor roles and addresses after References).
    [Show full text]