Genomic and Transcriptome Profiling of Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer by Rebecca Joanne Zoe Menzies B.Sc. a Thesis Submitted I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Genomic and Transcriptome Profiling of Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer By Rebecca Joanne Zoe Menzies B.Sc. A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto © Copyright Rebecca Joanne Zoe Menzies (2009) Genomic and Transcriptome Profiling of Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Master of Science 2009 Rebecca Joanne Zoe Menzies Department of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death by gynaecological malignancy. Elucidation of the driver genes of ovarian cancer will lead to treatment targets and tailored therapy for this disease. The Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 was used to study 100 serous ovarian samples and 10 normal ovarian samples to identify loci and driver genes. The ovarian cancer genome was found to have high overall genomic instability across all chromosomes and key known genes in this disease were identified in the dataset. Aberrant regions of copy number gain were located in “blocks” of constant copy number at 1p, 1q, 8q, 12p, 19q and 20q. The range in copy number for gains was 4.2 to 5.1. The “blocks” of genes were located at 8p and 5p for copy number losses. The range for copy number loss was 0.6 to 0.9. ii Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the support of my supervisor Dr. Tak W. Mak. His mentorship and guidance has been truly inspirational. I would also like to thank the members of my supervisory committee, Dr. Igor Jurisica and Dr. Ben Neel for their helpful comments, feedback and insights. Thanks to Nancy Ng and Yury Bukhman for their technical support with running the arrays. I would like to thank Dr. Elisabeth Tillier for her guidance, discussions and help with this project. I would also like to acknowledge our collaborators for the ovarian cancer project, Dr. Denis Slamon and Dr. Patricia Shaw. Thank you to all the members of the Mak laboratory for their helpful discussions, input and collegiality. During the course of my graduate studies I received funding from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR). I would finally like to thank my parents, Dr. Teresa Menzies and Dr. John Menzies, my two sisters, Erica Menzies and Dr. Fiona Menzies and my boyfriend Jonathan Covato. They, as always, provide the support and love I need to allow me to fulfill my goals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ...................................................................................................... iv List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................ viii List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer ......................................................... 2 1.2 Tumors of the Ovary ............................................................................ 2 1.3 Clinical Presentation of Ovarian Cancer ............................................... 3 1.4 Ovarian Cancer Screening .................................................................... 4 1.5 Ovarian Cancer Risk factors ................................................................ 5 1.6 Histological Subtypes of Ovarian Cancer ............................................. 5 1.7 Current Treatment Modalities .............................................................. 6 1.8 Prognosis ............................................................................................. 7 1.9 Theories on the Etiology of Ovarian Cancer ......................................... 9 1.10 Cancer “Drivers” ................................................................................ 10 1.11 Pathways in Cancer – Complexity Increases ...................................... 11 1.12 Molecular Genetics of Ovarian Cancer ............................................... 12 1.13 Ovarian Cancer Gene Expression ....................................................... 15 1.14 Structural Variation in Ovarian Cancer ............................................... 16 1.15 Parallels with Breast Cancer ............................................................... 17 1.16 Targeted Molecular Therapies ............................................................ 18 iv 1.17 Ovarian Cancer Genome-Wide Study ................................................. 18 1.18 Study Aims and Hypotheses ............................................................... 18 Chapter 2: Experimental Design and Methods ........................................................... 20 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 21 2.2 Collaboration and Sample Selection ................................................... 21 2.3 Platform Selection – Copy Number Array Technology ....................... 22 2.4 Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 .......................................... 24 2.5 DNA Requirements for the Array ..................................................... 25 2.6 Sample and Array Batches ................................................................. 26 2.7 Array Data Analysis ........................................................................... 27 2.8 Accessing Partek Genomics Suite 6.4 ................................................. 27 2.9 Allele Intensity Import and Fragment Restriction ............................... 28 2.10 Creating Copy Number from Intensities ............................................. 28 2.11 Principal Components Analysis .......................................................... 30 2.12 Copy Number Visualization ............................................................... 30 2.13 Segmentation Algorithms ................................................................... 31 2.14 Assessment of Overall Trends in Data ................................................ 34 2.15 Segments Found in Multiple Samples ................................................ 35 2.16 Gene Annotation ................................................................................ 36 2.17 Gene List ........................................................................................... 36 2.18 Removal of Redundant Genes in “Normal” Samples .......................... 37 2.19 Gene List Parameters ......................................................................... 37 2.20 Selection of Top Hits ......................................................................... 38 v 2.21 Functional Inquiry into Genes of Interest ........................................... 39 2.22 Pathway Analysis of Genes of Interest ............................................... 39 Chapter 3: Results ..................................................................................................... 40 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 41 3.2 Quality Control – Principal Components Analysis .............................. 41 3.3 Quality Control – Copy Number Histogram ....................................... 46 3.4 Copy Number Heat Maps ................................................................... 49 3.5 Serous Ovarian Cancer Heat Maps ..................................................... 49 3.6 Normal Sample Heat Maps ................................................................ 65 3.7 Normal and Serous Heat Map Comparison ......................................... 80 3.8 Copy Number Variation Karyoview ................................................... 81 3.9 Serous Gene List – Copy Number Gains ............................................ 85 3.10 Serous Gene List – Copy Number Losses ........................................... 96 3.11 Normal Gene List – Copy Number Gains ......................................... 101 3.12 Normal Gene List – Copy Number Losses ....................................... 101 3.13 Functional Inquiry for Top Genes of Interest .................................... 102 3.14 Pathway Analysis ......................................................................... ....106 Chapter 4: Discussion ............................................................................................. 108 4.1 Genomic Instability Identified in Serous Ovarian Cancer ................. 109 4.2 Cell Polarity Genes and Ovarian Cancer........................................... 110 4.3 Copy Number Alteration in Non-ovarian Cancer .............................. 111 4.4 Future Directions ............................................................................. 113 vi 4.5 Clinical Implications for Future Research......................................... 115 4.6 Conclusion ....................................................................................... 115 References ........................................................................................................ 117 Appendix ........................................................................................................ 137 vii List of Figures and Tables Figure 1 Age-adjusted cancer death rates in women from 1930-2003 (USA) ...... 2 Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier disease
Recommended publications
  • Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes

    Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes

    Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes by Sayed Mohsen Hosseini A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto © Copyright by S. Mohsen Hosseini 2014 Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes Sayed Mohsen Hosseini Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto 2014 Abstract Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Several lines of evidence suggest a genetic contribution to the risk of DR; however, no genetic variant has shown convincing association with DR in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). To identify common polymorphisms associated with DR, meta-GWAS were performed in three type 1 diabetes cohorts of White subjects: Diabetes Complications and Control Trial (DCCT, n=1304), Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR, n=603) and Renin-Angiotensin System Study (RASS, n=239). Severe (SDR) and mild (MDR) retinopathy outcomes were defined based on repeated fundus photographs in each study graded for retinopathy severity on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale. Multivariable models accounted for glycemia (measured by A1C), diabetes duration and other relevant covariates in the association analyses of additive genotypes with SDR and MDR. Fixed-effects meta- analysis was used to combine the results of GWAS performed separately in WESDR, ii RASS and subgroups of DCCT, defined by cohort and treatment group. Top association signals were prioritized for replication, based on previous supporting knowledge from the literature, followed by replication in three independent white T1D studies: Genesis-GeneDiab (n=502), Steno (n=936) and FinnDiane (n=2194).
  • Genetic Variants Contribute to Gene Expression Variability in Humans

    Genetic Variants Contribute to Gene Expression Variability in Humans

    INVESTIGATION Genetic Variants Contribute to Gene Expression Variability in Humans Amanda M. Hulse* and James J. Cai*,†,1 *Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics and †Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4458 ABSTRACT Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies have established convincing relationships between genetic variants and gene expression. Most of these studies focused on the mean of gene expression level, but not the variance of gene expression level (i.e., gene expression variability). In the present study, we systematically explore genome-wide association between genetic variants and gene expression variability in humans. We adapt the double generalized linear model (dglm) to simultaneously fit the means and the variances of gene expression among the three possible genotypes of a biallelic SNP. The genomic loci showing significant association between the variances of gene expression and the genotypes are termed expression variability QTL (evQTL). Using a data set of gene expression in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from 210 HapMap individuals, we identify cis-acting evQTL involving 218 distinct genes, among which 8 genes, ADCY1, CTNNA2, DAAM2, FERMT2, IL6, PLOD2, SNX7, and TNFRSF11B, are cross-validated using an extra expression data set of the same LCLs. We also identify 300 trans-acting evQTL between .13,000 common SNPs and 500 randomly selected representative genes. We employ two distinct scenarios, emphasizing single-SNP and multiple-SNP effects on expression variability, to explain the formation of evQTL. We argue that detecting evQTL may represent a novel method for effectively screening for genetic interactions, especially when the multiple-SNP influence on expression variability is implied.
  • Abolhalaj M Et Al, 2018.Pdf

    Abolhalaj M Et Al, 2018.Pdf

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Profling dendritic cell subsets in head and neck squamous cell tonsillar cancer and benign tonsils Received: 24 November 2017 Milad Abolhalaj1, David Askmyr2,3, Christina Alexandra Sakellariou1, Kristina Lundberg1, Accepted: 19 April 2018 Lennart Greif2,3 & Malin Lindstedt1 Published: xx xx xxxx Dendritic cells (DCs) have a key role in orchestrating immune responses and are considered important targets for immunotherapy against cancer. In order to develop efective cancer vaccines, detailed knowledge of the micromilieu in cancer lesions is warranted. In this study, fow cytometry and human transcriptome arrays were used to characterize subsets of DCs in head and neck squamous cell tonsillar cancer and compare them to their counterparts in benign tonsils to evaluate subset- selective biomarkers associated with tonsillar cancer. We describe, for the frst time, four subsets of DCs in tonsillar cancer: CD123+ plasmacytoid DCs (pDC), CD1c+, CD141+, and CD1c−CD141− myeloid DCs (mDC). An increased frequency of DCs and an elevated mDC/pDC ratio were shown in malignant compared to benign tonsillar tissue. The microarray data demonstrates characteristics specifc for tonsil cancer DC subsets, including expression of immunosuppressive molecules and lower expression levels of genes involved in development of efector immune responses in DCs in malignant tonsillar tissue, compared to their counterparts in benign tonsillar tissue. Finally, we present target candidates selectively expressed by diferent DC subsets in malignant tonsils and confrm expression of CD206/ MRC1 and CD207/Langerin on CD1c+ DCs at protein level. This study descibes DC characteristics in the context of head and neck cancer and add valuable steps towards future DC-based therapies against tonsillar cancer.
  • Manual Annotation and Analysis of the Defensin Gene Cluster in the C57BL

    Manual Annotation and Analysis of the Defensin Gene Cluster in the C57BL

    BMC Genomics BioMed Central Research article Open Access Manual annotation and analysis of the defensin gene cluster in the C57BL/6J mouse reference genome Clara Amid*†1, Linda M Rehaume*†2, Kelly L Brown2,3, James GR Gilbert1, Gordon Dougan1, Robert EW Hancock2 and Jennifer L Harrow1 Address: 1Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK, 2University of British Columbia, Centre for Microbial Disease & Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada and 3Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Göteborg University, Guldhedsgatan 10, S-413 46 Göteborg, Sweden Email: Clara Amid* - [email protected]; Linda M Rehaume* - [email protected]; Kelly L Brown - [email protected]; James GR Gilbert - [email protected]; Gordon Dougan - [email protected]; Robert EW Hancock - [email protected]; Jennifer L Harrow - [email protected] * Corresponding authors †Equal contributors Published: 15 December 2009 Received: 15 May 2009 Accepted: 15 December 2009 BMC Genomics 2009, 10:606 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-606 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/606 © 2009 Amid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Host defense peptides are a critical component of the innate immune system. Human alpha- and beta-defensin genes are subject to copy number variation (CNV) and historically the organization of mouse alpha-defensin genes has been poorly defined.
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
  • Evaluation of Chromatin Accessibility in Prefrontal Cortex of Individuals with Schizophrenia

    Evaluation of Chromatin Accessibility in Prefrontal Cortex of Individuals with Schizophrenia

    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05379-y OPEN Evaluation of chromatin accessibility in prefrontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia Julien Bryois 1, Melanie E. Garrett2, Lingyun Song3, Alexias Safi3, Paola Giusti-Rodriguez 4, Graham D. Johnson 3, Annie W. Shieh13, Alfonso Buil5, John F. Fullard6, Panos Roussos 6,7,8, Pamela Sklar6, Schahram Akbarian 6, Vahram Haroutunian 6,9, Craig A. Stockmeier 10, Gregory A. Wray3,11, Kevin P. White12, Chunyu Liu13, Timothy E. Reddy 3,14, Allison Ashley-Koch2,15, Patrick F. Sullivan 1,4,16 & Gregory E. Crawford 3,17 1234567890():,; Schizophrenia genome-wide association studies have identified >150 regions of the genome associated with disease risk, yet there is little evidence that coding mutations contribute to this disorder. To explore the mechanism of non-coding regulatory elements in schizophrenia, we performed ATAC-seq on adult prefrontal cortex brain samples from 135 individuals with schizophrenia and 137 controls, and identified 118,152 ATAC-seq peaks. These accessible chromatin regions in the brain are highly enriched for schizophrenia SNP heritability. Accessible chromatin regions that overlap evolutionarily conserved regions exhibit an even higher heritability enrichment, indicating that sequence conservation can further refine functional risk variants. We identify few differences in chromatin accessibility between cases and controls, in contrast to thousands of age-related differential accessible chromatin regions. Altogether, we characterize chromatin accessibility in the human prefrontal cortex, the effect of schizophrenia and age on chromatin accessibility, and provide evidence that our dataset will allow for fine mapping of risk variants. 1 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mapping DNA Structural Variation in Dogs

    Mapping DNA Structural Variation in Dogs

    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 3, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Resource Mapping DNA structural variation in dogs Wei-Kang Chen,1,4 Joshua D. Swartz,1,4,5 Laura J. Rush,2 and Carlos E. Alvarez1,3,6 1Center for Molecular and Human Genetics, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA; 2Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA; 3Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA DNA structural variation (SV) comprises a major portion of genetic diversity, but its biological impact is unclear. We propose that the genetic history and extraordinary phenotypic variation of dogs make them an ideal mammal in which to study the effects of SV on biology and disease. The hundreds of existing dog breeds were created by selection of extreme morphological and behavioral traits. And along with those traits, each breed carries increased risk for different diseases. We used array CGH to create the first map of DNA copy number variation (CNV) or SV in dogs. The extent of this variation, and some of the gene classes affected, are similar to those of mice and humans. Most canine CNVs affect genes, including disease and candidate disease genes, and are thus likely to be functional. We identified many CNVs that may be breed or breed class specific. Cluster analysis of CNV regions showed that dog breeds tend to group according to breed classes. Our combined findings suggest many CNVs are (1) in linkage disequilibrium with flanking sequence, and (2) associated with breed-specific traits.
  • Epithelial Barrier and Dendritic Cell Function in the Intestinal Mucosa

    Epithelial Barrier and Dendritic Cell Function in the Intestinal Mucosa

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Epithelial barrier and dendritic cell function in the intestinal mucosa Verstege, M.I. Publication date 2010 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Verstege, M. I. (2010). Epithelial barrier and dendritic cell function in the intestinal mucosa. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 Chapter 5. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in C- type lectin genes, clustered in the IBD2 and IBD6 susceptibility loci, may play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases Simone C. Wolfkamp1,2, Marleen I. Verstege1,2, Sander Meisner2, Pieter C. Stokkers1, Anje A. te Velde2 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam 2. Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Chapter 5 Abstract The balance between microbes and host defence mechanisms at the mucosal frontier plays an important, yet unclarified role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set

    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set

    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early

    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early

    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
  • Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer Mai Mohamed University of South Florida, Mmohamed@Health.Usf.Edu

    Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer Mai Mohamed University of South Florida, [email protected]

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School July 2017 Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer Mai Mohamed University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Pathology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Mohamed, Mai, "Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6907 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer by Mai Mohamed A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Pathology and Cell Biology Morsani College of Medicine University of South Florida Major Professor: Patricia Kruk, Ph.D. Paula C. Bickford, Ph.D. Meera Nanjundan, Ph.D. Marzenna Wiranowska, Ph.D. Lauri Wright, Ph.D. Date of Approval: June 29, 2017 Keywords: ovarian cancer, amylase, computational analyses, glycocalyx, cellular invasion Copyright © 2017, Mai Mohamed Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Ahmed and Fatma, who have always stressed the importance of education, and, throughout my education, have been my strongest source of encouragement and support. They always believed in me and I am eternally grateful to them. I would also like to thank my brothers, Mohamed and Hussien, and my sister, Mariam. I would also like to thank my husband, Ahmed.
  • TET2 Binding to Enhancers Facilitates Transcription Factor Recruitment in Hematopoietic Cells

    TET2 Binding to Enhancers Facilitates Transcription Factor Recruitment in Hematopoietic Cells

    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1 2 TET2 binding to enhancers facilitates 3 transcription factor recruitment in hematopoietic cells 4 5 Kasper D. Rasmussen1,2,7,8*, Ivan Berest3,8, Sandra Keβler1,2,6, Koutarou Nishimura1,4, 6 Lucía Simón-Carrasco1,2, George S. Vassiliou5, Marianne T. Pedersen1,2, 7 Jesper Christensen1,2, Judith B. Zaugg3* and Kristian Helin1,2,4*. 8 9 1Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of 10 Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. 2The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology 11 (Danstem), Faculty or Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, 12 Denmark. 3European Molecular Biology Institute, Structural and Computational Unit. 4Cell Biology Program, 13 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome 14 Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom and Department of Haematology, Cambridge 15 University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 6Present address: Friedrich Miescher Institute 16 for Biomedical Research (FMI), CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland. 7Present address: Centre for Gene Regulation 17 and Expression (GRE), School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 8These authors 18 contributed equally. 19 20 *Correspondence: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 21 22 Running title: TET2 and TF binding in enhancers 23 24 Keywords: Acute Myeloid Leukemia; Chromatin; DNA binding; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; 25 Hematopoiesis; TET2; Transcription Factor Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Rasmussen et al.