DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision of the EU Ecolabel Criteria for Paper Products

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision of the EU Ecolabel Criteria for Paper Products Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for Paper products Technical Report 2.0 Draft criteria proposal Malgorzata Kowalska, Shane Donatello, Miguel Gama Caldas, Oliver Wolf September, 2017 EUR xxxxx xx This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Malgorzata Kowalska Address: Edificio Expo, c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. 41092 Seville (Spain) Email: [email protected] Tel.: +34 954 488 347 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRCxxxxx EUR xxxxx xx PDF ISBN xxx-xx-xx-xxxxx-x ISSN xxxx-xxxx doi:xx.xxxxx/xxxxxx Seville: European Commission, 2017 © European Union, 2017 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this report: Malgorzata Kowalska et al., Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for Copying and Graphic Paper and Newsprint Paper, EUR, doi All images © European Union 2016 unless otherwise specified September 2017 EUR xxxxx xx Contents Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Brief background to the EU Ecolabel ............................................................... 4 1.2 The criteria revision process .......................................................................... 5 2 Preliminary Report summary ............................................................................... 6 2.1. Key environmental aspects and relation with the criteria proposal ..................... 6 3 Product group names, definitions and scopes proposal ......................................... 11 3.1 Name, definition and scope of EU Ecolabel .................................................... 11 3.2 Rationales for the revised proposal .............................................................. 12 3.2.1 Copying, graphic paper and newsprint paper .......................................... 14 3.2.2 Tissue paper ....................................................................................... 15 3.2.3. Business to Business labels: pulp and paper .......................................... 16 3.3. Outcomes from and after the 1st AHWG meeting: ......................................... 17 3.4. Further consideration ................................................................................. 17 4 Proposed framework for the revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria and main changes .. 20 5 Criteria proposal .............................................................................................. 21 5.1. Criterion 1: Emissions to water and air ........................................................ 21 5.1.1 Criterion 1a) Chemical Oxygen demand (COD), Phosphorus (P), Sulphur (S), Nitrogen oxides (NOx) .................................................................................. 23 5.1.2 Criterion 1b) AOX .............................................................................. 38 5.1.3 Criterion 1c) CO2 ............................................................................... 44 5.2 Criterion 2: Energy use ............................................................................. 54 5.2.1. Summary of the primary proposal ........................................................ 56 5.2.2. Rationales for the revised proposal ....................................................... 56 5.2.3. The general approach of BREF to energy management ............................ 58 5.2.4. Outcomes from and after the 1st AHWG meeting ................................... 59 5.2.5. Further research and main changes ...................................................... 60 5.2.6. Summary of the reference sources for the proposed values ..................... 70 5.2.7. Methodology for reporting on energy consumption ................................. 70 5.3 Criterion 3: Fibres – conserving resources, sustainable forest management ..... 73 5.3.1 Criteria proposal – fibre sourcing ........................................................... 73 5.3.2 Summary of the primary proposal ......................................................... 75 5.3.3 Rationale of proposed criterion text ....................................................... 76 5.3.4 Outcomes from 1st AHWG meeting ......................................................... 78 1 5.3.5 Further research and main changes ....................................................... 80 5.4 Criterion 4: Restricted hazardous substances and mixtures ............................. 88 5.4.1 Criteria proposal – horizontal hazardous substance and mixture restrictions 88 5.4.2 Criteria proposal – specific hazardous substance restrictions ..................... 94 5.5 Criterion 5: Waste Management ................................................................ 101 5.5.1. Summary of the proposal .................................................................. 101 5.5.2. Outcomes from and after the 1st AHWG meeting ................................. 102 5.5.3. Rationale for the revised proposal ...................................................... 102 5.6 Criterion 6: Fitness for use ........................................................................ 105 5.6.1. Rationales for the revised proposal ..................................................... 105 5.6.2. Outcomes from and after the 1st AHWG meeting ................................. 106 5.7 Criterion 7: Information on the packaging (Copying and graphic paper/Newsprint Paper only) ................................................................................................... 108 5.8 Criterion 8: Information appearing on the EU Ecolabel (Copying and graphic paper/Newsprint Paper) .................................................................................. 108 6 Proposed criteria areas ................................................................................... 110 6.1 Water consumption control ....................................................................... 110 6.1.1. Outcomes from and after the 1st AHWG meeting ................................. 111 6.2 EDTA and DTPA ....................................................................................... 112 6.3 Optical Brightening Agents ........................................................................ 113 7. Impact of changes to criteria ........................................................................... 115 References ....................................................................................................... 117 List of abbreviations and definitions ..................................................................... 127 List of figures .................................................................................................... 128 List of tables ..................................................................................................... 129 Appendices ....................................................................................................... 131 Appendix I. Forest Europe criteria and indicators (2015)..................................... 131 Appendix II. Azo dye restrictions ..................................................................... 133 Appendix III Guarantees of origin certification across Members States ................. 135 2 Abstract The current revised technical report (TR2.0) provides an update on the criteria revision, based on new information collected during the revision and provided by the involved parties (i.e. through stakeholders' discussion at the 1st AHWG meeting, further stakeholder inputs following the meetings, emission, energy, and chemical sub-groups co-operation followed by additional desk research). The most significant proposals and changes are: To merge the product groups copying and graphic paper , newsprint paper and tissue paper under one common group : paper products; To update current emission limits and scoring system for Criterion 1(a); To update or reformulate current AOX emission limits - Criterion 1(b); To update and reformulate energy consumption criterion and related CO2 emissions requirement – Criterion 1(c) and Criterion 2; To introduce a common ambition level for fibre sourcing criteria for all three product types (more ambitious for Copying and Graphic Paper and Tissue Paper but less restrictive for Newsprint Paper) – Criterion 3; To harmonize the chemical criterion according to recent findings of Chemical Task Force – Criterion 4. For criteria that addresses emissions to water and air and energy use, the recently published BREF document for pulp, paper and board products has been taken as the main reference for the revision of reference values. Further data from the license holders were gathered via responses to the 2nd questionnaire circulated by DG JRC. The emission and energy consumption requirements were discussed with dedicated sub-groups. For the above issues and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Making! the E-Magazine for the Fibrous Forest Products Sector
    PAPERmaking! The e-magazine for the Fibrous Forest Products Sector Produced by: The Paper Industry Technical Association Volume 5 / Number 1 / 2019 PAPERmaking! FROM THE PUBLISHERS OF PAPER TECHNOLOGY Volume 5, Number 1, 2019 CONTENTS: FEATURE ARTICLES: 1. Wastewater: Modelling control of an anaerobic reactor 2. Biobleaching: Enzyme bleaching of wood pulp 3. Novel Coatings: Using solutions of cellulose for coating purposes 4. Warehouse Design: Optimising design by using Augmented Reality technology 5. Analysis: Flow cytometry for analysis of polyelectrolyte complexes 6. Wood Panel: Explosion severity caused by wood dust 7. Agriwaste: Soda-AQ pulping of agriwaste in Sudan 8. New Ideas: 5 tips to help nurture new ideas 9. Driving: Driving in wet weather - problems caused by Spring showers 10. Women and Leadership: Importance of mentoring and sponsoring to leaders 11. Networking: 8 networking skills required by professionals 12. Time Management: 101 tips to boost everyday productivity 13. Report Writing: An introduction to report writing skills SUPPLIERS NEWS SECTION: Products & Services: Section 1 – PITA Corporate Members: ABB / ARCHROMA / JARSHIRE / VALMET Section 2 – Other Suppliers Materials Handling / Safety / Testing & Analysis / Miscellaneous DATA COMPILATION: Installations: Overview of equipment orders and installations since November 2018 Research Articles: Recent peer-reviewed articles from the technical paper press Technical Abstracts: Recent peer-reviewed articles from the general scientific press Events: Information on forthcoming national and international events and courses The Paper Industry Technical Association (PITA) is an independent organisation which operates for the general benefit of its members – both individual and corporate – dedicated to promoting and improving the technical and scientific knowledge of those working in the UK pulp and paper industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature's Recyclers Activity Guide
    NATURE’S RECYCLERS ACTIVITY GUIDE WA-1425 To Naturalists/Interpreters: CONTENTS Many of us don’t realize that while we are rinsing cans and OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES 3 stomping milk jugs for recycling, other creatures are also busy Trash Hunt 3 recycling Lichens, mushrooms, sow bugs, earthworms and Litter — It’s Everywhere 4 beetles spend their whole lives recycling for nature Nature’s Dead Tree & Rotting Log Study 5 recyclers are responsible for turning dead plants and animals Mushroom Adventure 8 back into usable nutrients for other plants and animals Likewise, Where Do Things Come From? 9 humans are responsible for turning trash back into reusable materials INDOOR ACTIVITIES 12 Recycling For the Birds 12 Parks and outdoor recreation areas are great locations for Recycling Games 14 demonstrating the importance of recycling The natural setting has visual examples of cycles, recyclers and natural resources LONGER PROJECTS 17 You can use these examples to make connections between for Classroom, Home, or natural and human recycling, and between recycling and Residential Camp preservation of natural resources People coming to parks and Make Your Own Paper 17 nature centers to relax and enjoy the outdoors are generally Earthworm Castles 18 receptive to recycling hints and ideas that will help save the Microbe Garden 20 natural resources they love Mini-Composts 21 Natural Dyes 23 This activity guide book will help you teach about natural recycling, cycles in nature, and the important role people play IDEAS FOR EXHIBITS 24 in recycling The activities
    [Show full text]
  • Paper and Board Packaging Recyclability Guidelines
    FOR THE FU IGN TU ES R D E PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES Helping retailers and brands specify and design packaging that can be reprocessed in paper mills 2 PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES 3 CONTENTS PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING RECYCLABILITY GUIDELINES Paper is a sustainable, renewable and ecologically sound choice for packaging DE because almost all paper and board is recyclable. In practice, the recyclability of 4 Plastic SIG packaging products will be determined by composition and design, and the way N they are collected and presented for reprocessing. The vast majority of paper- based products are easily recyclable. 8 Coatings FO R Paper recycling in the UK is a success story, with over 80% of paper and board 9 Peelable Solutions T packaging recovered for recycling. Paper for Recycling (PfR) is collected primarily H for use in manufacturing processes and is used as an alternative to virgin materials e.g. wood pulp. When presented it should therefore be of adequate quality and 10 Varnishes and Curable Varnishes E Recyclability of paper-based packaging economically viable to use. F As society evolves, different applications are found for paper and board which 11 Adhesives U sometimes require changes to its functionality. This is often achieved by combining 11 Alternative Barriers T the fibre substrate with another material to form a composite multi-layer laminate, U providing properties such as water resistance or a gas barrier to extend product life. These changes provide challenges for recycling, and in many instances can R 97% 12 Paper Products 3% increase the costs of reprocessing and of waste disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Did You Know That All of These Types of Paper Are Recyclable In
    Did you know that all of these types of paper are recyclable in Massachusetts? MassRecycle has surveyed the paper mills and materials recovery facilities in Massachusetts to determine what types of paper can be recycled. Following is the list of papers that will be accepted by all of these facilities*: • Booklets • Lottery tickets • Books – soft cover • Mail – including junk mail • Boxes – for office supplies, like paper clips • Magazines • Boxes – cereal, shoe, cracker, pasta, etc • Mat board – used in picture framing • Boxes – with plastic windows • Math paper – graph and ledger, etc. • Brochures – including glossy • Newspapers – with or without inserts • Calendars – wall type • Newsprint • Cardboard – corrugated and paperboard • Office and copy paper • Catalogs • Packing paper • Charlie cards – paper MBTA tickets • Paper bags – brown and white • Clasp envelopes • Paper bags – with handles • Colored paper • Paper – lined and white • Construction and kraft paper • Paper towel and toilet paper tubes • Cover and card stock, index cards • Phone Books • Envelopes –plastic windows or labels ok • Photocopies • Fax paper • Pizza boxes – clean, turned inside out • File folders • Post-it notes • Flyers • Receipts • Glossy paper • Shredded paper in paper bags • Greeting cards • Spiral notebooks • Hanging file folders • Writing tablets Remember: You do not need to remove staples, paper clips, tape, spirals or windows from your paper prior to recycling. _______________________________________________________________________________ *If your current program takes more papers than what is on this list, please keep recycling them! The purpose of this list is to include papers common to ALL paper mills and paper recycling programs in Massachusetts. .
    [Show full text]
  • An Invitation to Recycling
    An Invitation to Recycling Begin with recycling, continue with creativity and end with a celebration. GRADES Makes for a good collaborative lesson between Science and Art K–4 teachers. Time Required: 2 class period (90 minutes) without extensions • Gather materials (see activity pages). • One week prior to this activity, have students keep track of all the paper the class uses by saving all paper recycling bins and having students make sure they discard paper products appropriately as part of the data collection process. • You might label several different bins or boxes during this time period to mark the different categories such as: white paper; colored paper; newspaper; cardboard; other. • You might also have students collect and bring in materials like bits of thread, petals from silk flowers, glitter or any- thing else that is tiny and resistant to water. • Make copies of Activity Pages (optional depending on abilities) Have students keep track of the amount of paper they use as a class in a week. Have students come up with reasons they may be keeping track of this. Optional: read a story like The Lorax, by Dr. Seuss (or any other piece of literature or story about saving the environment). Ask students to reflect and consider if the story describes anything that could really hap- pen in our lives. Discuss why humans cut down trees and what trees are used for. • Have students calculate how much paper they use in a week. This can be done in terms of # of sheets of paper, or mass, for example. To save paper, consider projecting this information onto a screen once tabulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Hands-On Explorations of Plane Transformations
    Hands-On Explorations of Plane Transformations James King University of Washington Department of Mathematics [email protected] http://www.math.washington.edu/~king The “Plan” • In this session, we will explore exploring. • We have a big math toolkit of transformations to think about. • We have some physical objects that can serve as a hands- on toolkit. • We have geometry relationships to think about. • So we will try out at many combinations as we can to get an idea of how they work out as a real-world experience. • I expect that we will get some new ideas from each other as we try out different tools for various purposes. Our Transformational Case of Characters • Line Reflection • Point Reflection (a rotation) • Translation • Rotation • Dilation • Compositions of any of the above Our Physical Toolkit • Patty paper • Semi-reflective plastic mirrors • Graph paper • Ruled paper • Card Stock • Dot paper • Scissors, rulers, protractors Reflecting a point • As a first task, we will try out tools for line reflection of a point A to a point B. Then reflecting a shape. A • Suggest that you try the semi-reflective mirrors and the patty paper for folding and tracing. Also, graph paper is an option. Also, regular paper and cut-outs M • Note that pencils and overhead pens work on patty paper but not ballpoints. Also not that overhead dots are easier to see with the mirrors. B • Can we (or your students) conclude from your C tool that the mirror line is the perpendicular bisector of AB? Which tools best let you draw this reflection? • When reflecting shapes, consider how to reflect some polygon when it is not all on one side of the mirror line.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Recycling Technology Detailed Part 1A
    Paper Recycling Technology and Science Dr. Richard A. Venditti Paper Science and Engineering Forest Biomaterials Department North Carolina State University Lecture: Paper recycling and technology course introduction and objectives Dr. Richard Venditti Faculty member in the Paper Science and Engineering Program in the Forest Biomaterials Department at North Carolina State University PhD in Chemical Engineering, BS in Pulp and Paper Science and Chemical Engineering Research areas: � Paper recycling � Utilization of forest/agricultural materials for new applications � Life cycle analysis Named a TAPPI Fellow in 2012 Relevant research projects: – The detection of adhesive contaminants – The changes in fibers upon recycling – Automatic sorting of recovered papers – Flotation deinking surfactants – Agglomeration deinking – Screening phenomena and pressure sensitive adhesives – Deposition of adhesive contaminants – Neural networks to control deinking operations – Sludge conversion to bio-ethanol and to bio- materials Course Outline The US Paper Recycling Industry Recovered Paper Grades and Contaminants Effect of Recycling on Fibers/Paper Unit Operations � Pulping, Cleaning, Screening, Washing, Flotation, Dispersion, Bleaching, ….. Image Analysis, Deinking Chemicals System Design Advanced/Additional Topics Course Activities Viewing of the Videos of Lectures � Base lectures by Venditti � Guest lectures from industry leaders Homework assignments Final Exam Critical Issues in Recycling: Going deeper into the recovered paper stream
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the EU Ecolabel Criteria for Paper Products
    Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for Paper products Technical Report 3.0 Draft criteria proposal Malgorzata Kowalska, Shane Donatello, Oliver Wolf January, 2018 EUR xxxxx xx This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Malgorzata Kowalska Address: Edificio Expo, c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. 41092 Seville (Spain) Email: [email protected] Tel.: +34 954 488 347 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRCxxxxx EUR xxxxx xx PDF ISBN xxx-xx-xx-xxxxx-x ISSN xxxx-xxxx doi:xx.xxxxx/xxxxxx Seville: European Commission, 2018 © European Union, 2018 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this report: Malgorzata Kowalska et al., Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for Copying and Graphic Paper and Newsprint Paper, EUR, doi All images © European Union 2016 unless otherwise specified January 2018 EUR xxxxx xx Contents Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Brief background to the EU Ecolabel ............................................................... 4 1.2 The criteria revision process .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wryly Noted-Books About Books John D
    Against the Grain Volume 29 | Issue 6 Article 22 December 2017 Wryly Noted-Books About Books John D. Riley Gabriel Books, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Riley, John D. (2017) "Wryly Noted-Books About Books," Against the Grain: Vol. 29: Iss. 6, Article 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.7886 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Wryly Noted — Books About Books Column Editor: John D. Riley (Against the Grain Contributor and Owner, Gabriel Books) <[email protected]> https://www.facebook.com/Gabriel-Books-121098841238921/ Paper: Paging Through History by Mark Kurlansky. (ISBN: 978-0-393-23961-4, thanks to the development of an ingenious W. W. Norton, New York 2016.) device: a water-powered drop hammer.” An- other Fabriano invention was the wire mold for laying paper. “Fine wire mesh laid paper came his book is not only a history of paper, ample room to wander into Aztec paper making to define European paper. Another pivotal but equally, of written language, draw- or artisan one vat fine paper making in Japan. innovation in Fabriano was the watermark. Ting, and printing. It is about the cultural Another trademark of Kurlansky’s is a Now the paper maker could ‘sign’ his work.” and historical impact of paper and how it has pointed sense of humor. When some groups The smell from paper mills has always been central to our history for thousands of advocated switching to more electronic formats been pungent, due to the use of old, dirty rags years.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Paper and the Environment 1 FACT SHEET Paper and the Environment Paper and the Environment
    Fact sheet: paper and the environment 1 FACT SHEET Paper and the environment Paper and the environment For 2000 years, paper has helped shape the modern world. It has been hugely important in developing our cultural and creative life. Newspapers, magazines, books, packaging and banknotes are everywhere – and how many of us actually work in a ‘paperless office’? Concerns still abound over paper’s use and production. What paper you choose, and how you use it, makes a difference. This fact sheet concentrates on European paper production and use. Hopefully it will answer some of your main questions. Fact sheet: paper and the environment 3 Is paper bad for the environment? What to look for when choosing When recycled or FSC virgin fibre based paper are not available, then the fallback would be to ask for In a nutshell – no. Paper is made from a renewable a paper paper that is certified under an alternative forest raw material that can be recycled. It boasts the Use paper with post-consumer recycled fibre. certification scheme, such as the Programme for highest rate of recycling of any material in the Fibre from collected waste paper materials can the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes UK, and it is potentially sustainable. Demand also be reused up to seven times before becoming too (PEFC). encourages responsible forestry and the growth worn out to bind together. Although it needs to be of recycling. de-inked, recycling uses much less energy, chemicals Responsible pulp and paper producers monitor and water, and normally produces less pollution, and manage energy, waste, raw material selection European paper production uses non-tropical than processing virgin wood fibres.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Comply with Your Environmental Permit Additional Guidance For
    27/07/2018. on withdrawn was and date How to comply with your environmental permit of Additional guidance for: out is Paper and Pulp (EPR 6.01) document This 27/07/2018. on withdrawn was and date of out is Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 0870 8506506 documentEmail: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk This © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. March 2009 GEHO0209BPJB-E-E Contents 27/07/2018. on Introduction ............................................................................................................................2 Installations covered .............................................................................................................3 Key issues ............................................................................................................................4 1. Managing your activities ...................................................................................................7 1.1 Energy efficiency ............................................................................................................7 1.2 Efficient use of raw materials and water .........................................................................8withdrawn 1.3 Avoidance, recovery and disposal of wastes................................................................10 2. Operations ........................................................................................................................was
    [Show full text]
  • Elemental Chlorine-Free Bleaching of Soda Rapeseed Pulp
    ELEMENTAL CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHING OF SODA RAPESEED PULP FRANTIŠEK POTŮČEK and MARTINA ŘÍHOVÁ University of Pardubice, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic ✉Corresponding author: František Potůček, [email protected] Dedicated to the memory of the founder of the Cellulose Chemistry and Technology Journal, Acad. Professor Cristofor I. Simionescu Received November 18, 2016 Soda rapeseed pulps delignified to kappa numbers of 21.4 and 16.4 underwent elemental chlorine-free bleaching using chlorine dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, and peracetic acid as bleaching agents under laboratory conditions. Three four-stage bleaching sequences, DEPPPaa, D0EPD1P and D0EPD1D2, were applied to investigate the properties of bleached soda pulps, namely their brightness, zero-span breaking length and degree of polymerisation. For comparison, an oxygen-predelignified kraft softwood pulp with an initial kappa number of 10.5 was bleached under the same conditions. Soda pulps subjected to bleaching processes comprising two or three D stages were found to have a final brightness of 83.1 to 83.8% ISO, which was lower than that of 87.6 to 87.9% ISO obtained for kraft softwood pulp. The decrease in fibre strength was of only 7-9% for soda pulps, slightly greater than that of kraft softwood pulp. In contrast to fibre strength, the loss in the degree of polymerisation was considerable, roughly of 35% for soda pulps and 40 to 47% for kraft softwood pulp, depending on the
    [Show full text]