Ice at the Lunar Poles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ice at the Lunar Poles A reprint from American Scientist the magazine of Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society This reprint is provided for personal and noncommercial use. For any other use, please send a request to Permissions, American Scientist, P.O. Box 13975, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, U.S.A., or by electronic mail to [email protected]. ©Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society and other rightsholders Ice at the Lunar Poles That the Moon harbors ice at high latitudes is well known. The source of that water, however, may come as something of a surprise Richard R. Vondrak and Dana H. Crider n March 6, 1998, The New York This same story, plus or minus some This orientation, which results in the OTimes presented its readers with details, appeared that spring in every- absence of seasons on the Moon, has some intriguing news: “An American thing from USA Today to NASA press endured for billions of years. As a con- spacecraft has found evidence that rel- releases. In the five years that have sequence, there are places near the atively large amounts of frozen water since elapsed, much has been learned poles, such as the interiors of some exist on the Moon, scattered in craters from the spacecraft involved in this steep-walled craters, that are perma- over vast spans of the north and south discovery, and scientists like ourselves nently shaded from the Sun and thus poles....” This article explained that have had a chance to ponder and ex- remain at frigid temperatures—about “[r]ather than being entirely a dry tend these results. So we are in a good –200 degrees Celsius—throughout the wasteland ... the Moon may have position now to review the chain of long lunar day. Any gases that reach enough water, in the form of small ice events leading up to the dramatic 1998 such surfaces would quickly freeze in a crystals mixed in loose dirt, to sustain announcement—and to explain why manner reminiscent of the “cold traps” lunar colonies and provide fuel for some of the statements made at that used in laboratory vacuum systems to rockets exploring the solar system,” a time may have to be modified in light collect stray vapors. reference to the fact that oxygen and of recent scientific progress. The notion that the Moon might har- hydrogen, the constituents of water, In particular, we would like to de- bor ice in its own natural cold traps make excellent rocket propellants. scribe here why we and others believe languished for almost two decades, de- Continuing to read on about the that the source of the polar water is spite a great deal of scientific scrutiny Moon, one would have learned that more complicated than these news sto- focused on the Moon during the Apol- “any water present would have come ries indicated. Interestingly, an appre- lo space program. Indeed, study of the from its bombardment by comets” and ciation for the details of where the wa- rocks brought back by the Apollo as- that “the only water that would re- ter came from also calls into question tronauts showed no evidence that wa- main on the airless Moon would have the assertion that the deposits of ice at ter has ever been present in substantial to be hidden in craters in places shield- the lunar poles represent a unique re- quantities on the Moon. Yet the con- ed from sunlight, which would evapo- source for future colonization or space cept of cold traps on the Moon re- rate any moisture.” exploration. A fuller understanding of emerged in 1979, when James R. the origins of this lunar water also Arnold of the University of California, Richard R. Vondrak obtained a doctorate in highlights what, in our view, may be San Diego used the information gar- physics and astronomy from Rice University in the greatest value of these ice deposits: nered during the Apollo years to esti- 1970. After postdoctoral appointments at the as a scientific resource for understand- mate that substantial amounts of water Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm and at ing the evolution of both the Moon might be generated within the lunar Rice, he took a position at Stanford Research In- stitute. He later moved to the Lockheed Palo Alto and the Earth. soil (which, because it lacks organic Research Laboratory, where he served as Director components, is more properly called of Space Physics, before joining NASA in 1995 to Hot Bodies, Cold Traps regolith). That water, according to head the Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics at The history of this subject really starts Arnold, may migrate to the lunar poles Goddard Space Flight Center. Dana H. Crider re- in 1961, when Kenneth Watson, Bruce and be deposited there as ice. But be- ceived her Ph.D. in 1999 from Rice University. C. Murray and Harrison Brown of the cause none of the Apollo landings or She spent the next three years at Goddard Space California Institute of Technology put orbiters visited the lunar poles, there Flight Center as a National Research Council forth the first serious scientific specula- was really no direct evidence for or postdoctoral associate and as a research affiliate tion about the existence of ice at the lu- against Arnold’s supposition. through Catholic University of America. She is nar poles. In an article in the prestig- Curiously enough, the next ad- currently studying the interaction of the solar wind with Mars and with the Moon as a research ious Journal of Geophysical Research, they vance came from studies not of the faculty member with the Catholic University pointed out that the equatorial plane Moon but of the planet Mercury. In Physics Department. Address for Vondrak: of the Moon is canted only 1.5 degrees the early 1990s maps made with radio NASA/GSFC, Code 690, Greenbelt, MD 20771. from the ecliptic (the orbital plane of telescopes revealed bright radar re- Internet: [email protected] the Earth and Moon about the Sun). flections bouncing back from both po- 322 American Scientist, Volume 91 © 2003 Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society. Reproduction with permission only. Contact [email protected]. Figure 1. Seeing the ever-changing phases of the Moon reminds the viewer that half of Earth’s companion is illuminated—or rather that almost half of it is. Some areas near the poles are permanently in shadow because the Sun remains quite low in the sky throughout the lunar day. Space scientists have long pondered whether such places on the Moon might retain frozen volatiles such as water ice, and, as of five years ago, most were convinced that they do. The authors used numerical models to investigate the probable source of that water and its fate after it freezes out. This image of the Moon above the Earth’s horizon and airglow was recorded by the astronauts of Space Shuttle Columbia, who died tragical- ly during re-entry in February. (Image courtesy of NASA.) lar caps of Mercury. Those reflections probe that the U.S. Department of De- kilometers in diameter and more than had a particular signature consistent fense and NASA launched in 1994 12 kilometers deep in places (relative with water ice on the surface. Because with the intent of visiting a nearby as- to the rim)—that is, deeper than the the spin axis of Mercury is nearly per- teroid. To test its instruments, con- Marianas Trench in the Pacific Ocean. fectly perpendicular to its orbital trollers first sent Clementine into a po- The existence of this giant basin further plane, that planet too has permanent- lar orbit around the Moon. A technical revived interest in the possibility of po- ly shaded regions at its poles. So the glitch forced the planned asteroidal en- lar ice on the Moon. discovery that such spots hold ice on counter to be scrubbed, but the scien- Lacking a source of illumination, the an otherwise searingly hot planet tific payoff from its travels around the optical camera on Clementine could not boosted the credibility of those who Moon was considerable. For example, obtain images from within permanently predicted that volatiles like water con- Clementine discovered a deep gash on shaded polar regions. But recognizing dense and survive in high-latitude the far side of the Moon that extends to the possibility that some of these places cold traps on the Moon. the South Pole. That structure, now might harbor ice, the scientists running The first spacecraft to observe the lu- known as South Pole–Aitken Basin, is the mission attempted an impromptu nar poles in detail was Clementine, a an old impact crater, more than 2,500 experiment, one that mimicked www.americanscientist.org © 2003 Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society. Reproduction 2003 July–August 323 with permission only. Contact [email protected]. plane of N At last, in 1998, a probe that offered N the Earth’s 23˚ a way to answer this question visited equator ecliptic the Moon. Along with several other in- plane 1.5˚ struments, the Lunar Prospector space- craft carried a neutron spectrometer, which detected a sharp decrease in the flux of medium-energy neutrons ema- 5.2˚ nating from polar regions. This was a Earth key observation, one that merits a full Moon 6.7˚ explanation of its significance. The surface of the Moon gives off Sun plane of neutrons not because it is itself partic- S the Moon's ularly radioactive. Rather, these neu- equator trons result from the impact of galactic S cosmic rays, which rain down from deep space and hit the lunar surface, Figure 2.
Recommended publications
  • Lunar Water ISRU Measurement Study (LWIMS): Establishing a Measurement Plan for Identifi Cation and Characterization of a Water Reserve
    NASA/TM-20205008626 Lunar Water ISRU Measurement Study (LWIMS): Establishing a Measurement Plan for Identifi cation and Characterization of a Water Reserve Julie Kleinhenz Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Amy McAdam Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland Anthony Colaprete Ames Research Center, Moff ett Field, California David Beaty Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California Barbara Cohen Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland Pamela Clark Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California John Gruener Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas Jason Schuler Kennedy Space Center, Kennedy Space Center, Florida Kelsey Young Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland October 2020 NASA STI Program . in Profi le Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientifi c and to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. technical fi ndings by NASA-sponsored The NASA Scientifi c and Technical Information (STI) contractors and grantees. Program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain this important role. • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected papers from scientifi c and technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices meetings sponsored or co-sponsored by NASA. of the Agency Chief Information Offi cer. It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientifi c, NASA’s STI. The NASA STI Program provides access technical, or historical information from to the NASA Technical Report Server—Registered NASA programs, projects, and missions, often (NTRS Reg) and NASA Technical Report Server— concerned with subjects having substantial Public (NTRS) thus providing one of the largest public interest. collections of aeronautical and space science STI in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Untangling the Formation and Liberation of Water in the Lunar Regolith
    Untangling the formation and liberation of water in the lunar regolith Cheng Zhua,b,1, Parker B. Crandalla,b,1, Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davisc,2, Hope A. Ishiic, John P. Bradleyc, Laura M. Corleyc, and Ralf I. Kaisera,b,2 aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Hawai‘iatManoa, Honolulu, HI 96822; bW. M. Keck Laboratory in Astrochemistry, University of Hawai‘iatManoa, Honolulu, HI 96822; and cHawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘iatManoa, Honolulu, HI 96822 Edited by Mark H. Thiemens, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved April 24, 2019 (received for review November 15, 2018) −8 −6 The source of water (H2O) and hydroxyl radicals (OH), identified between 10 and 10 torr observed either an ν(O−H) stretching − − on the lunar surface, represents a fundamental, unsolved puzzle. mode in the 2.70 μm (3,700 cm 1) to 3.33 μm (3,000 cm 1) region The interaction of solar-wind protons with silicates and oxides has exploiting infrared spectroscopy (7, 25, 26) or OH/H2Osignature been proposed as a key mechanism, but laboratory experiments using secondary-ion mass spectrometry (27) and valence electron yield conflicting results that suggest that proton implantation energy loss spectroscopy (VEEL) (28). However, contradictory alone is insufficient to generate and liberate water. Here, we dem- studies yielded no evidence of H2O/OH in proton-bombarded onstrate in laboratory simulation experiments combined with minerals in experiments performed under ultrahigh vacuum − − imaging studies that water can be efficiently generated and re- (UHV) (10 10 to 10 9 torr) (29).
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 13 Mission Review
    APOLLO 13 MISSION REVIEW HEAR& BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS SECOR’D SESSION JUR’E 30, 1970 Printed for the use of the Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 47476 0 WASHINGTON : 1970 COMMITTEE ON AEROKAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES CLINTON P. ANDERSON, New Mexico, Chairman RICHARD B. RUSSELL, Georgia MARGARET CHASE SMITH, Maine WARREN G. MAGNUSON, Washington CARL T. CURTIS, Nebraska STUART SYMINGTON, bfissouri MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon JOHN STENNIS, Mississippi BARRY GOLDWATER, Arizona STEPHEN M.YOUNG, Ohio WILLIAM B. SAXBE, Ohio THOJfAS J. DODD, Connecticut RALPH T. SMITH, Illinois HOWARD W. CANNON, Nevada SPESSARD L. HOLLAND, Florida J4MES J. GEHRIG,Stad Director EVERARDH. SMITH, Jr., Professional staffMember Dr. GLENP. WILSOS,Professional #tad Member CRAIGVOORHEES, Professional Staff Nember WILLIAMPARKER, Professional Staff Member SAMBOUCHARD, Assistant Chief Clerk DONALDH. BRESNAS,Research Assistant (11) CONTENTS Tuesday, June 30, 1970 : Page Opening statement by the chairman, Senator Clinton P. Anderson-__- 1 Review Board Findings, Determinations and Recommendations-----_ 2 Testimony of- Dr. Thomas 0. Paine, Administrator of NASA, accompanied by Edgar M. Cortright, Director, Langley Research Center and Chairman of the dpollo 13 Review Board ; Dr. Charles D. Har- rington, Chairman, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel ; Dr. Dale D. Myers, Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight, and Dr. Rocco A. Petrone, hpollo Director -___________ 21, 30 Edgar 11. Cortright, Chairman, hpollo 13 Review Board-------- 21,27 Dr. Dale D. Mvers. Associate Administrator for Manned SDace 68 69 105 109 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIOSS 1. Internal coinponents of oxygen tank So. 2 ---_____-_________________ 22 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy & Physics
    Science Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy & Physics: A Topical Index Compiled by Andrew Fraknoi (U. of San Francisco, Fromm Institute) Version 7 (2019) © copyright 2019 by Andrew Fraknoi. All rights reserved. Permission to use for any non-profit educational purpose, such as distribution in a classroom, is hereby granted. For any other use, please contact the author. (e-mail: fraknoi {at} fhda {dot} edu) This is a selective list of some short stories and novels that use reasonably accurate science and can be used for teaching or reinforcing astronomy or physics concepts. The titles of short stories are given in quotation marks; only short stories that have been published in book form or are available free on the Web are included. While one book source is given for each short story, note that some of the stories can be found in other collections as well. (See the Internet Speculative Fiction Database, cited at the end, for an easy way to find all the places a particular story has been published.) The author welcomes suggestions for additions to this list, especially if your favorite story with good science is left out. Gregory Benford Octavia Butler Geoff Landis J. Craig Wheeler TOPICS COVERED: Anti-matter Light & Radiation Solar System Archaeoastronomy Mars Space Flight Asteroids Mercury Space Travel Astronomers Meteorites Star Clusters Black Holes Moon Stars Comets Neptune Sun Cosmology Neutrinos Supernovae Dark Matter Neutron Stars Telescopes Exoplanets Physics, Particle Thermodynamics Galaxies Pluto Time Galaxy, The Quantum Mechanics Uranus Gravitational Lenses Quasars Venus Impacts Relativity, Special Interstellar Matter Saturn (and its Moons) Story Collections Jupiter (and its Moons) Science (in general) Life Elsewhere SETI Useful Websites 1 Anti-matter Davies, Paul Fireball.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon 440 Document II-1 Document Title
    440 Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon Document II-1 Document Title: NASA, “ Minutes of Meeting of Research Steering Committee on Manned Space Flight,” 25–26 May 1959. Source: Folder 18675, NASA Historical Reference Collection, History Division, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC. Within less than a year after its creation, NASA began looking at follow-on programs to Project Mercury, the initial human spacefl ight effort. A Research Steering Committee on Manned Space Flight was created in spring 1959; it consisted of top-level representatives of all of the NASA fi eld centers and NASA Headquarters. Harry J. Goett from Ames, but soon to be head of the newly created Goddard Space Flight Center, was named chair of the committee. The fi rst meeting of the committee took place on 25 and 26 May 1959, in Washington. Those in attendance provided an overview of research and thinking related to human spacefl ight at various NASA centers, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and the High Speed Flight Station (HSFS) at Edwards Air Force Base. George Low, then in charge of human spacefl ight at NASA Headquarters, argued for making a lunar landing NASA’s long-term goal. He was backed up by engineer and designer Maxime Faget of the Space Task Group of the Langley Research Center and Bruce Lundin of the Lewis Research Center. After further discussion at its June meeting, the Committee agreed on the lunar landing objective, and by the end of the year a lunar landing was incorporated into NASA’s 10-year plan as the long-range objective of the agency’s human spacefl ight program.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining the Evolutionary History of the Moon and the Inner Solar System: a Case for New Returned Lunar Samples
    Space Sci Rev (2019) 215:54 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-019-0622-x Constraining the Evolutionary History of the Moon and the Inner Solar System: A Case for New Returned Lunar Samples Romain Tartèse1 · Mahesh Anand2,3 · Jérôme Gattacceca4 · Katherine H. Joy1 · James I. Mortimer2 · John F. Pernet-Fisher1 · Sara Russell3 · Joshua F. Snape5 · Benjamin P. Weiss6 Received: 23 August 2019 / Accepted: 25 November 2019 / Published online: 2 December 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract The Moon is the only planetary body other than the Earth for which samples have been collected in situ by humans and robotic missions and returned to Earth. Scien- tific investigations of the first lunar samples returned by the Apollo 11 astronauts 50 years ago transformed the way we think most planetary bodies form and evolve. Identification of anorthositic clasts in Apollo 11 samples led to the formulation of the magma ocean concept, and by extension the idea that the Moon experienced large-scale melting and differentiation. This concept of magma oceans would soon be applied to other terrestrial planets and large asteroidal bodies. Dating of basaltic fragments returned from the Moon also showed that a relatively small planetary body could sustain volcanic activity for more than a billion years after its formation. Finally, studies of the lunar regolith showed that in addition to contain- ing a treasure trove of the Moon’s history, it also provided us with a rich archive of the past 4.5 billion years of evolution of the inner Solar System. Further investigations of samples returned from the Moon over the past five decades led to many additional discoveries, but also raised new and fundamental questions that are difficult to address with currently avail- able samples, such as those related to the age of the Moon, duration of lunar volcanism, the Role of Sample Return in Addressing Major Questions in Planetary Sciences Edited by Mahesh Anand, Sara Russell, Yangting Lin, Meenakshi Wadhwa, Kuljeet Kaur Marhas and Shogo Tachibana B R.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Sector Lunar Exploration Hearing
    PRIVATE SECTOR LUNAR EXPLORATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 Serial No. 115–27 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–174PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California MO BROOKS, Alabama DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon BILL POSEY, Florida ALAN GRAYSON, Florida THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky AMI BERA, California JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma ELIZABETH H. ESTY, Connecticut RANDY K. WEBER, Texas MARC A. VEASEY, Texas STEPHEN KNIGHT, California DONALD S. BEYER, JR., Virginia BRIAN BABIN, Texas JACKY ROSEN, Nevada BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia JERRY MCNERNEY, California BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana PAUL TONKO, New York DRAIN LAHOOD, Illinois BILL FOSTER, Illinois DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida MARK TAKANO, California JIM BANKS, Indiana COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii ANDY BIGGS, Arizona CHARLIE CRIST, Florida ROGER W. MARSHALL, Kansas NEAL P. DUNN, Florida CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE HON. BRIAN BABIN, Texas, Chair DANA ROHRABACHER, California AMI BERA, California, Ranking Member FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma ZOE LOFGREN, California MO BROOKS, Alabama DONALD S.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles for a Practical Moon Base T Brent Sherwood
    Acta Astronautica 160 (2019) 116–124 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Principles for a practical Moon base T Brent Sherwood Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA ABSTRACT NASA planning for the human space flight frontier is coming into alignment with the goals of other planetary-capable national space agencies and independent commercial actors. US Space Policy Directive 1 made this shift explicit: “the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization”. The stage is now set for public and private American investment in a wide range of lunar activities. Assumptions about Moon base architectures and operations are likely to drive the invention of requirements that will in turn govern development of systems, commercial-services purchase agreements, and priorities for technology investment. Yet some fundamental architecture-shaping lessons already captured in the literature are not clearly being used as drivers, and remain absent from typical treatments of lunar base concepts. A prime example is general failure to recognize that most of the time (i.e., before and between intermittent human occupancy), a Moon base must be robotic: most of the activity, most of the time, must be implemented by robot agents rather than astronauts. This paper reviews key findings of a seminal robotic-base design-operations analysis commissioned by NASA in 1989. It discusses implications of these lessons for today's Moon Village and SPD-1 paradigms: exploration by multiple actors; public-private partnership development and operations; cislunar infrastructure; pro- duction-quantity exploitation of volatile resources near the poles to bootstrap further space activities; autonomy capability that was frontier in 1989 but now routine within terrestrial industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Moon Landings - Luna 9
    Age Research cards 7-11 years Moon landings - Luna 9 About Credit-Pline On the 3 February 1966, Luna 9 made history by being the first crewless space mission to make a soft landing on the surface of the Moon. It was the ninth mission in the Soviet Union’s Luna programme (the previous five missions had all experienced spacecraft failure). The Soviet Union existed from 1922 to 1991 and was the largest country in the world; it was made up of 15 states, the largest of which was the Russian Republic, now called Russia. The Space Race is a term that is used to describe the competition between the United States of America and the Soviet Union which lasted from 1955 to 1969, as both countries aimed to be the first to get humans to the Moon. Working scientifically The Luna 9 spacecraft had a mass of 98kg (about outwards to make sure the spacecraft was stable the same as a baby elephant) and it carried before it began its scientific exploration. communication equipment to send information back to Earth, a clock, a heating system, a power The camera on board took many photographs of source and a television system. The spacecraft the lunar surface including some panoramic included scientific equipment for two enquiries: images. These images were transmitted back to one to find out what the lunar surface was like; Earth using radio waves. Although the Soviet and another to find out how much dangerous Union didn’t release these photographs to the rest radiation there was on the lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Life & Research at Moonbase: ILEWG Euromoonmars Campaigns Results 2018-2020
    Life & Research at Moonbase: ILEWG EuroMoonMars campaigns results 2018-2020 Prof. Bernard Foing, Executive Director ILEWG EuroMoonMars, Prof Leiden/VU Amsterdam/ISU/CNRS co-director Intl Moonbase Alliance, founder MoonVillage MVA, Vice chair COSPAR SC-B planets & PEX Exploration Panel, IAA [email protected], EGU officer, chair IAF ITACCUS, (Fr ESA Chief scientist, chair ESTEC staff, SMART-1 Project scientist) + EuroMoonMars LeadTeam (2020-21) Roxana, Sarah, Agata, Sabrina, Henk, Fabian, Marc, Michael, Julien, Nancy, Mathieu & YLEs 2021 Kevin, Hannah, Chiaru, Gary &TU Dublin, EMMPOL 3-6 & CHILL-Ice teams, LEAPS ExoMars team, Adrien & ChileMoonMars, 2021 Yke, Christoph, Iris, Johanna, Daniel, Jourdain & Space Data Analysis, Alexis, Samir, Amanda, Hans, Thijs, Shaodi AI4EO 2020-21 Henk, Michaela, Anouk, Priyanka, Marc, Heloise & EMMIHS3-4, Roxana & IPSA EMMPOL1-2, Armin & ARCHES, Eibhlin 2019 Henk, Michaela, Nity, Sebastian, Annelotte, Josh, Ben, Paul, Andrew, Dan, Sabrina, Charlotte, Ana, Ariane & EMMIHS1-2, 2018-19 Tatiana, Bram, Marc, Dieke, Marjolein, Bram, Isaac, Guido, Amanda & VU Igluna, Marius, Germaine, Yolanda, Yvette et al 2018-2021 Anna, Elizaveta & ArtMoonMars & MoonGallery 2018 Elise, Louis, Sandro, Anna, Anastasia I, Alexander, Jolanda, 2017 Arthur L, Heleen V, Agata K, Matt H, Matteus K, Maria G, Andjela T, Pierre E, Lorene, Axel , Cynthia, Tibor , Angeliki, 2016 Clément J, Oscar K, Valentin G, Manon M, Irene S, Christiane H et al + YLEs Grantees Young Lunar Explorers MoonMars Space Data Analysis, AI, Instruments, ExoGeoLab, ExoHab, ESA ESTEC/EAC, NASA, MoonMars base, field test, EVAs, deserts/volcans/lavatubes, Eifel, MDRS, HI-SEAS, Iceland,Chile, Inspiration, Education,Outreach, Astronautics Training Academy, Services, Jobs, Socio-Cultural, ArtMoonMars, Moon Gallery, Interdisciplinary, Innovation, Inclusive, Intergeneration, International [email protected] , ILEWG, euromoonmars.space, @spacemoonmars, @euromoonmars, @astronaut.center.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme : Towards the Use of Lunar Resources
    Programme : Towards the Use of Lunar Resources Day 1, Tuesday 3 July: Setting the Scene (Erasmus High Bay) Time Duration Presenter Subject Affiliation 9:15 00:15 J. Carpenter Welcome and introduction remarks ESA 09:30 00:05 J. Woerner Welcome address (Video Message) ESA Director General 09:35 00:10 D. Parker Lunar Exploration in the ESA European Exploration ESA Director of Envelope Programme Human and Robotic Exploration Programmes 09:45 00:15 J. Carpenter Towards a Lunar Resources Strategy ESA 10:00 00:15 G. Sanders Lunar Resources in NASA NASA 10:15 00:15 A. Abbud- The current status of lunar resources Colorado Madrid School of Mines 10:30 00:10 Clive Neal Lunar Resources in the LEAG Exploration Roadmap University of Notre Dame 10:40 00:20 Coffee Break Rationales for Utilising Lunar Resources 1: Use Cases 11:00 00:15 M. Landgraf Products and quantities to close ISRU ESA 11:15 00:05 R. Gonzalez- In-situ resource needs for production of energy in UPC- Cinca future lunar exploration scenarios Barcelona Tech 11:20 00:05 Agata Space Logistics mindset in Ariane Group Ariane Group Jozwicka- Perlant 11:25 00:05 R. Buchwald Airbus vision of sustained lunar exploration Airbus architecture based on ISRU Defence and Space 11:30 00:05 L. Kiewiet Concept of Operations for harvesting ice in the Lunar SpacE P. Delande south pole to produce rocket propellant Exploration and Development Systems (SEEDS) 11:35 00:05 M. Viturro Transport architecture based on lunar water". ISAE- Balufo & S. SUPAERO 1 Programme : Towards the Use of Lunar Resources Segura Munoz 11:40 00:05 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Moon Michael B
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 2 2 Why Go to the Moon? Exploration Rationales and Motivations............................................ 3 2.1 Expansion of humans into space..................................................................................... 3 2.2 The Search for Energy Alternatives................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solar Power Satellites ............................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Lunar Power System............................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 3He......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 The industrialization of space ....................................................................................... 12 2.4 Exploration and development of the Solar System....................................................... 13 2.5 The Moon as a planetary science laboratory................................................................. 15 2.6 Astronomical observatories on the Moon..................................................................... 17 2.7 Maintenance of human health on long-duration missions ............................................ 20 3 Transportation by rocket in the Earth-Moon system ...........................................................
    [Show full text]