Georgia's Philosophical Landscape
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Damana Melikishvili 236 Ioane Petritsi and John Italus on Two Original
236 Damana Melikishvili IOANE PETRITSI AND JOHN ITALUS ON TWO ORIGINAL CAUSES Damana Melikishvili The great medieval thinker and theologian Ioane Petritsi—“the Platonic Philosopher,” as contemporaries called him—is a representative of a new stage in the history of Christian thought. The study of his literary legacy has great importance for establishing trends of development in philosophy and theology both in Georgia and in the Christian Orient in general and the relationship between those trends with similar processes in Europe. The role of Neoplatonism in the formation of the history of philosophy and medieval theological thought is well known. This philosophical trend, which is considered to be a link between ancient Greek philosophy and medieval thought, also exerted a strong influence on medieval Georgian thought, which is evidenced by the translation of the Corpus Areopagiticum by Ephrem Mtsire (Minor) in the 11th century. There is a listing of textbooks in the Gelati theological-philosophical school known as the Gelati Academy (12–13th centuries); this school was a Georgian analogue of the Mangana School in Constantinople and employed the same trivium-quadrivium system of subjects. This listing of books broadly contains the same Neoplatonic literature that was used as textbooks in medieval European schools.1 It was on the basis of those translations and commentaries that Ephrem Mtsire, Arsen Iqaltoeli, and Ioane Petritsi formed the formal- semantic system of Georgian philosophical-theological terminology. Those thinkers based their intellectual pursuits on the “highest philosophy” that had been established in the medieval centers of learning, in which the Dialectic of John Damascene, which was a compendium of Aristotelian logic based on his commentators, held the main place among the subjects of the so-called trivium-quadrivium. -
BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: the EMERGENCE of a NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM in RUSSIA by Alyssa J. Deblasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova
BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA by Alyssa J. DeBlasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova University, 2003 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2010 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Alyssa J. DeBlasio It was defended on May 14, 2010 and approved by Tatiana Artemyeva, Professor, Herzen State Pedagogical University (St. Petersburg, Russia), Department of Theory and History of Culture Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures James P. Scanlan, Emeritus Professor, The Ohio State University, Department of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Alyssa J. DeBlasio 2010 iii BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA Alyssa J. DeBlasio, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2010 This dissertation takes as its primary task the evaluation of a conflict of paradigms in Russian philosophical thought in the past decade. If until the early nineties Russian philosophers were often guilty of uncritically attributing to their domestic philosophy a set of characteristics that fell along the lines of a religious/secular binary (e.g. literary vs. analytic; continuous vs. ruptured), in recent years the same scholarship is moving away from the nineteenth-century model of philosophy as a “path” or “special mission,” as it has been called by Konstantin Aksakov, Aleksei Khomiakov, Ivan Kireevskii, and later, Nikolai Berdiaev, among others. -
CEU Department of Medieval Studies
ANNUAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES AT CEU VOL. 18 2012 Central European University Budapest Annualis 2012.indb 1 2012.07.31. 15:59:40 Annualis 2012.indb 2 2012.07.31. 15:59:42 ANNUAL OF MEDIEVAL STUDIES AT CEU VOL. 18 2012 Edited by Judith Rasson and Marianne Sághy Central European University Budapest Department of Medieval Studies Annualis 2012.indb Sec1:1 2012.07.31. 15:59:42 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the permission of the publisher. Editorial Board Niels Gaul, Gerhard Jaritz, György Geréby, Gábor Klaniczay, József Laszlovszky, Marianne Sághy, Katalin Szende Editors Judith Rasson and Marianne Sághy Technical Advisor Annabella Pál Cover Illustration Labskhaldi Gospel, 12th century, 29×22 cm, parchment. Canon Table, detail (4 r) Georgian National Museum. Svanety Museum of History and Ethnography, Mestia. www.museum.ge. Reproduced by permission Department of Medieval Studies Central European University H-1051 Budapest, Nádor u. 9., Hungary Postal address: H-1245 Budapest 5, P.O. Box 1082 E-mail: [email protected] Net: http://medievalstudies.ceu.hu Copies can be ordered at the Department, and from the CEU Press http://www.ceupress.com/order.html ISSN 1219-0616 Non-discrimination policy: CEU does not discriminate on the basis of—including, but not limited to—race, color, national or ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation in administering its educational policies, admissions policies, scholarship and loan programs, and athletic and other school-administered programs. © Central European University Produced by Archaeolingua Foundation & Publishing House Annualis 2012.indb Sec1:2 2012.07.31. -
Merab Mamardashvili in Memoria
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS: H. E. Guenther Baechler, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Switzerland in Georgia TBILISI SCHOOL OF POLITICAL STUDIES MOSCOW SCHOOL OF POLITICAL STUDIES Florian Gubler, Deputy Head of Mission, Embassy of Switzerland in Georgia Zurab Abashidze, Special Representative of the Prime Minister of Georgia for Russian Merab Mamardashvili in Memoria Relations Giorgi Meladze, Project Coordinator of the Tbilisi School of Political Studies Joint Expert Meeting of the Tbilisi Moscow School of Political Studies and Moscow Schools of Political Studies 1. Andrey Kolesnikov, Opinion Editor, “Novaya Gazeta” “Batumi Initiative” 2. Feydor Lukyanov, Editor-in-Chief of Russia in Global Affairs Journal, Member of the Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy 3. Aleksey Makarkin, First Vice-President of the Center for Political Technologies Tbilisi, 17-18 November 2012 4. Tatyana Malkina, Editor-In-Chief of the Magazine “Otechestvennie Zapiski” 5. Elena Nemirovskaya, Founder of the Moscow School of Political Studies 6. Nikita Sokolov, Editor, “Otechestvennye Zapiski”, Historian Tbilisi School of Political Studies 1. Armaz Akhvlediani, Founder and Director of the Tbilisi School of Political Studies 2. Levan Gigineishvili, Professor at Ilia State University 3. Sergi Kapanadze, President of Georgia's Reforms Associate; Professor of International Relations at Tbilisi State University 4. Irakli Menagarishvili, Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Strategic Research Center 5. Marina Muskhelishvili, Director of the Center for Social Studies 6. Lasha Tugushi, Editor-in-Chief of the Newspaper “Resonance” *Betsy's Hotel Tel: (995-32) 2931404 Mob: (995-599) 575594 www.betsyshotel.com SATURDAY, 17 NOVEMBER SUNDAY, 18 NOVEMBER 15:45 Arrival at the Tbilisi Airport 10:00 – 12:00 Session 2 Analyzing the Present Situation Part 1 16:30 Check-in at the "Betsy's" Hotel * 12:00 – 12:30 Coffee Brake 17:30 –18:30 Dinner 12:30 – 14:30 Analyzing the Present Situation Part 2 18:45 – 19:00 Opening Remarks: H. -
Political Forum: 10 Questions on Georgia's Political Development
1 The Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development Political Forum: 10 Questions on Georgia’s Political Development Tbilisi 2007 2 General editing Ghia Nodia English translation Kakhaber Dvalidze Language editing John Horan © CIPDD, November 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or oth- erwise, without the prior permission in writing from the proprietor. CIPDD welcomes the utilization and dissemination of the material included in this publication. This book was published with the financial support of the regional Think Tank Fund, part of Open Society Institute Budapest. The opinions it con- tains are solely those of the author(s) and do not reflect the position of the OSI. ISBN 978-99928-37-08-5 1 M. Aleksidze St., Tbilisi 0193 Georgia Tel: 334081; Fax: 334163 www.cipdd.org 3 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................ 5 Archil Abashidze .................................................................................. 8 David Aprasidze .................................................................................21 David Darchiashvili............................................................................ 33 Levan Gigineishvili ............................................................................ 50 Kakha Katsitadze ...............................................................................67 -
Ketevan BEZARASHVILI 72B, Iosebidze Street, Apt. 127 Tbilisi, 0160 Georgia Telephone:+995( 32) 37 78 08 E-Mail:[email protected]
Ketevan BEZARASHVILI 72b, Iosebidze Street, Apt. 127 Tbilisi, 0160 Georgia Telephone:+995( 32) 37 78 08 E-mail:[email protected] Curriculum Vitae Education Ph.D. Philology, 2004: Tbilisi State Univcersity Thesis title: "Theory and Practice of Rhetoric and Translation according to the Translations of the Writings of Gregory the Theologian" Ph.D. Philology, 1990: Tbilisi State University. (Candidate) Thesis title: “The Georgian Version of Gregory of Nazianzus’ Poetry”. B.A. (Honors), 1978: Tbilisi State University, Philology. Employment 2002 June: Visiting Researcher at the Catholic University of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 1998 June-July: Visiting Researcher at the Catholic University of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 1995 February: Visiting Researcher at the Catholic University of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 1993-1995: Lecturer, Tbilisi Theological Academy. Lecturer, Independent Institute of Foreign Languages. 1991: Senior Researcher, Kekelidze Institute of Manuscripts, Tbilisi. 1990 October-November: Visiting Researcher at the Catholic University of Louvain- la-Neuve, Belgium. 1989 December: Visiting Researcher of “Ivan Dujchev” Research Center for Slavonic-Byzantine Studies at the “Clement Okhridski” University of Sofia, Bulgaria. 1 1986-1991: Researcher, Kekelidze Institute of Manuscripts. 1984-1986: Assistant Researcher, Kekelidze Institute of Manuscripts. 1983: Lecturer, Tbilisi State University. Assistant, Kekelidze Institute of Manuscripts. 1979-1982: Post-graduate student of the Faculty of Old Georgian Literature, Tbilisi State University. Subjects Taught: Byzantine Hymnography Byzantine Epistolography Latin Byzantine-Georgian Literary Interrelations Grants 2004 August - 2007 August: INTAS grant 2000March - 2002 March: INTAS grant 1996 January - 1998 December: INTAS grant Personal Born February 8, 1956, Divorced. A List of Main Publications of K. Bezarashvili for the Last 5 Years: Gelati School (prepared for Pravoslavna% +nciklopedi%). -
Shalva Nutsubidze, Was a Member of the Group of Several Scholars Whose Joint Efforts Re- Sulted in the Creation of the University
PHILOSOPHY IN GEORGIA: FROM NEOPLATONISM TO POSTMODERMISM ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universiteti anastasia zaqariaZe irakli braWuli filosofia saqarTveloSi: neoplatonizmidan postmodernizmamde IVANE JAVAKHISHVILI TBILISI STATE UNIVERSITY ANASTASIA ZAKARIADZE IRAKLI BRACHULI PHILOSOPHY IN GEORGIA: FROM NEOPLATONISM TO POSTMODERMISM This research discusses the main tendencies of Georgian philo- sophy: its basic principles and perspectives, the importance of the Western, especially the European cultural heritage, and the Geor- gian contribution to the history of ideas in a global perspective. Metaphysical issues of cognition, truth, identity, virtue and value, wisdom and power; problems of ethical, social, political and aes- thetic character, as well as phenomenological, philosophical-theo- logical and linguistic research, are central to Georgian philosophy and exemplify its continuing relevance vis-À-vis the Western tradi- tion in its broadest sense. Although philosophical ideas in Georgia rarely matured into a well-balanced and self-sufficient system, as original conceptions one may distinguish some ideas of Christian Neo-Platonism and Alethological Realism. The volume is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. Scientific Editors: Cornelia B. Horn Basil Lourie On the cover there is a portrait sketch of Niko Pirosmani (Nikala) by Pablo Picasso. One of the most influential artists of modernity was never personally acquainted with the early XX cen- tury Georgian primitivist painter, but he knew his works. Pirosma- ni posthumously rose to prominence. Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Press, 2018 ISBN 978-9941-13-732-7 C O N T E N T S Acknowledgements ............................................................ 7 Editorial Preface ................................................................ 8 In Lieu of an Introduction ............................................... 11 1. Ioane Petritsi and Georgian Neoplatonism .............. -
PHILOSOPHY in GEORGIA: from NEOPLATONISM to POSTMODERMISM Ivane Javaxisvilis Saxelobis Tbilisis Saxelmwifo Universiteti
PHILOSOPHY IN GEORGIA: FROM NEOPLATONISM TO POSTMODERMISM ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universiteti anastasia zaqariaZe irakli braWuli filosofia saqarTveloSi: neoplatonizmidan postmodernizmamde IVANE JAVAKHISHVILI TBILISI STATE UNIVERSITY ANASTASIA ZAKARIADZE IRAKLI BRACHULI PHILOSOPHY IN GEORGIA: FROM NEOPLATONISM TO POSTMODERMISM This research discusses the main tendencies of Georgian phi- losophy: its basic principles and perspectives, the importance of the Western, especially the European cultural heritage, and the Ge- orgian contribution to the history of ideas in a global perspective. Metaphysical issues of cognition, truth, identity, virtue and value, wisdom and power; problems of ethical, social, political and aes- thetic character, as well as phenomenological, philosophical-theo- logical and linguistic research, are central to Georgian philosophy and exemplify its continuing relevance vis-À-vis the Western tradi- tion in its broadest sense. Although philosophical ideas in Georgia rarely matured into a well-balanced and self-sufficient system, as original conceptions one may distinguish some ideas of Christian Neo-Platonism and Alethological Realism. The volume is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of Ivane Ja- vakhishvili Tbilisi State University. Scientific Editors: Cornelia B. Horn Basil Lourie On the cover there is a portrait sketch of Niko Pirosmani - (Nikala) by Pablo Picasso. One of the most influential artists of modernity was never personally acquainted with the early XX cen- tury Georgian primitivist painter, but he knew his works. Pirosma- ni posthumously rose to prominence. Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Press, 2018 ISBN 978-9941-13-732-7 C O N T E N T S Acknowledgments .............................................................. 7 Editorial Preface ................................................................ 8 In Lieu of an Introduction ............................................... 11 1. -
Merab Mamardashvili's Psychological
DMITRY LEONTIEV LIFE AS HEROIC EFFORT: MERAB MAMARDASHVILI’S PSYCHOLOGICAL TOPOLOGY OF THE WAY Existence is what you must do here and now. That excludes postponing to tomorrow or transposing it to the shoulders of another one, to the shoulders of thy neighbor, the nation, the state, the society. You must yourself. But the human being does not feel like doing this. Merab Mamardashvili (1995, p.20) The object of the reflections proposed below is Merab Mamardashvili’s system of views explicated in two books: Lectures on Proust 1995)1 and Psychological topology of the way (1997).2 Both books are transcripts of lecture courses read in 1982 and 1984/85 correspondingly. They are devoted to the same subject and have multiple overlaps; however, they are textually quite different. The second text presents a somewhat later version of Mamardashvili’s attempts to treat the same issues in a more elaborated form. Speaking or writing about Mamardashvili and his ideas, especially ideas and views of the last decade of his life, is an extremely complicated task. It would be absolutely impossible to summarize his views in a few statements, nor to extract some definitions from his texts. His lecture courses of the 1980s give a picture of a curvilinear, spiral movement of his thought, constantly coming back to the issues already discussed and trying to express the same meaning by different words – for there were no words directly corresponding to the meanings he had in mind in everyday language, nor in the philosophical and psychological discourses. People say that when Mamardashvili was giving his course on Proust in Tbilisi, Georgia, he started lecturing in Russian language and many listeners felt offended – why a Georgian is giving lectures for Georgians in other language than Georgian? Mamardashvili explained calmly that Proust cannot be translated into Georgian. -
Levan Gigineishvili 194 IOANE PETRITSI's PREFACE to HIS
194 Levan Gigineishvili IOANE PETRITSI’S PREFACE TO HIS ANNOTATED TRANSLATION OF THE BOOK OF PSALMS Levan Gigineishvili Translator’s Foreword Almost a century has passed since Shalva Nutsubidze and Simon Kaukhchishvili established the first and thus far the only edition of Ioane Petritsi’s commentaries accompanying his Georgian translation of Proclus’ Elements of Theology (1937). Their edition was supplemented by Shalva Nutsubidze’s introductory article on the nature of Petritsi’s philosophy and its place in the context of medieval philosophy in Byzantium and Georgia. Despite raising some controversial points, in his comments on thiswork, which was one of the earliest of Petritsi’s studies, Nutsubidze provided pertinent and precise insights, especially in pointing to Petritsi’s unique and pioneering role in the development of philosophical thought in Georgia and in discerning Renaissance features in his philosophy. In fact, preceding Pico Della Mirandola and Marcilio Ficino by several centuries, Petritsi espoused an attitude towards the relationships between Christianity and Greek philosophy that not only opened theway for conceiving the possibil- ity of rapprochement, but that even declared such a rapprochementas necessary. For Petritsi, Plato and the Neoplatonists were in touch with the eternal truth of the order of reality. He found the study of their philosophy to be indispensable for Christians. Moreover, he thought it appropriate to interpret the Bible in the light of Neoplatonic philosophy. There were similar traits in the philosophy of Petritsi’s immediate Byzantine predecessors, Michael Psellus and John Italus. Yet Petritsi was able to reach an even bolder synthesis, creating a comprehensive project of philosophizing Christianity, that is to say, of building a common dis- course on truth for both Christian revelation and Neoplatonic metaphysics. -
LZA Vēstis a Daļa, 2017. Gada 2. Numurs
LZA LOCEKĻU KORESPONDENCE VIsLIeLāKā dIVdesMITā gadsIMTa žēLasTīBa Vatikāna Otrajam koncilam — 51 Zbigņevs Stankevičs [email protected] Atslēgas vārdi: Baznīca, koncils, evaņģelizācija, atjaunotne, skaidrošana, dialogs, kopība Vatikāna Otrā koncila teksti un mācība pareizi jāskaidro Latvijas kontekstā līdz ar katolisko Baznīcu. Kardināla Racingera intervija 1985. gadā palīdz izcelt sekojošas atziņas: gala dokumentu lasīšana palīdzētu atklāt koncila patieso garu. Koncils bija pravietisks, jo palīdz risināt pašreizējās problēmas. Baznīcas kustības un grupas, liturģiskā reforma, ticības dilogs dažādos līmeņos pauž tiekšanos pēc svētuma un dziļāku izpratni par Baznīcu kā noslēpumu un kopību. Baznīcas atjaunotne ir vērsta uz evaņģelizāciju un atbilstošām attiecībām ar pasauli. Koncila dokumenti ir saistīti savā starpā un to pastorālā nozīme nav šķirama no doktrinālās nozīmes. Baznīcas locekļiem jāpārdomā sava attieksme pret koncilu, iesaistoties liturģijā, Dieva Vārda novērtēšanā, misijā un tuvībā cilvēkiem ar žēlsirdības darbu veikšanu. 2016. gada 8. decembrī apritēja piec- na Otrā koncila dokumentiem, lai pareizi desmit viens gads, kopš darbu beidza Va- intepretētu šā Koncila mācību Latvijas tikāna Otrais koncils. Šogad šī koncila do- kontekstā un elpotu līdzi ar visu katolisko kumenti tiek izdoti latviešu valodā. Tas Baznīcu: “Šodien aizstāvēt īsto Baznīcas katoliskajai Baznīcai Latvijā ir ļoti būtiski, Tradīciju nozīmē aizstāvēt Koncilu. Tā ir arī jo palīdzēs saprast, kāpēc Vatikāna Otrais mūsu vaina, ja mēs reizēm (kā “labējiem”, -
Mutsali by Givi Margvelashvili: the Aesthetics of Post-Modernism and the Problem of Deconstruction of the Classical Texts
Nana Gaprindashvili, Nino Aptsiauri, Mari Simonishvili Nana Gaprindashvili Nana Gaprindashvili was born in 1958. She studied at Belarus State and Tbilisi State Universities. In 1980 she graduated from Tbilisi State University, majoring in Philology. In 1985 she defended her candidate dissertation and obtained a scientific degree of Candidate of Philology; in 1993 she defended her doctoral dissertation and became Doctor of Philology. In 2000 Nana Gaprindashvili became a Professor. She is the author of five monographs, five course books and up to 85 scientific articles; Nana Gaprindashvili is a Professor at the Faculty of Humanities at Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. The spheres of her interest are: Translation Studies, Comparative Literature, Rhetoric, Literary Theory, and Issues of Georgian spelling. Mutsali by Givi Margvelashvili: The Aesthetics of Post-modernism and the Problem of Deconstruction of the Classical Texts Abstract: Mutsali by Givi Margvelashvili one of the most interesting works in European post- modernism is a great example of how Georgian sources (Aluda Ketelauri by Vazha-Pshavela and Merani by Nikoloz Baratashvili) become interwoven in the western discourse. Hence, the deconstruction of the classical literary text, one of the most important characteristics of post- modern aesthetics, becomes apparent in Mutsali. Keywords: Mutsali by Givi Margvelashvili, Aluda Ketelauri by Vazha-Pshavela, Merani by Nikoloz Baratashvili, Deconstruction of Texts, Postmodernism Post-modernism, which has become a natural phenomenon for the developed society, enables the modern society to be seen or understood within the framework of post-modern philosophy. Thus, post-modernism has become a universal category of the XX century, expressing the “spirit of the era”.