DOCSLIB.ORG

Compendium of Invasive Species Laws

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compendium of Invasive Species Laws MONTANA INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL INVASIVE SPECIES LAW REVIEW COMPENDIUM OCTOBER 2018 Montana Invasive Species Council, in partnership with the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation 2018 MONTANA INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL COMPENDIUM 1 Cover photo: Madison River near West Yellowstone, Montana. Montana Office of Tourism and Business Development MONTANA INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL COMPENDIUM 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 STATE AUTHORITIES .................................................................................................. 5 A. General: ................................................................................................................................... 5 1. MCA: Title 7, Chapter 1, Part 2 – Creation of New Boards .......................................... 5 2. MCA: Title 7, Chapter 11, Part 10 – Creation and Governance of Special Districts5 3. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 12 – Invasive Species Council .................................. 18 B. Aquatic Invasive Species: ................................................................................................ 19 1. ARM: Title 4, Chapter 12, Part 13 – Quarantines and Pest Management .............. 19 2. ARM: Title 4, Chapter 12, Part 39 – Eurasian Watermilfoil Management Area ... 24 3. ARM: Title 12, Chapter 5, Part 7 – Resource Protection ............................................. 25 4. MCA: Title 23, Chapter 2, Part 3 – Pubic Trust Doctrine ........................................... 28 5. MCA: Title 75, Chapter 6, Part 3 – Regional Water and Wastewater Authority Act .................................................................................................................................................. 33 6. MCA: Title 75, Chapter 7, Part 1 – Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act .................................................................................................................................................. 44 7. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 5, Part 4 – Use of Flood Plains and Floodways .................. 51 8. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 10 – Montana Aquatic Invasive Species Act ......... 53 C. Insect Pests: ......................................................................................................................... 62 1. MCA: Title 7, Chapter 22, Part 23 – County Control of Insect Pests ........................ 62 2. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 13, Part 3 – Control of Forest Diseases and Pest Control 63 3. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 4 – Quarantine and Pest Management .................. 65 4. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 5 – Crop Insect Detection and Management ......... 66 D. Terrestrial Plant/Noxious Weeds: ................................................................................. 68 1. ARM: Title 4, Chapter 5, Part 1 – Noxious Weed Trust Fund .................................... 68 2. ARM: Title 4, Chapter 5, Part 2 – Designation of Noxious Weeds ............................. 71 3. ARM: Title 4, Chapter 5, Part 5 – Noxious Weed Training ......................................... 73 4. MCA: Title 7, Chapter 22, Part 21 – County Weed Act ............................................... 73 5. MCA: Title 7, Chapter 22, Part 41 – Control of Nuisance Weeds within Municipality ........................................................................................................................... 85 6. ARM: Title 36, Chapter 11, Part 4 – Weed Management ............................................. 85 7. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 7 – Regulation of Importation or Sale of Noxious Weeds ...................................................................................................................................... 86 8. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 8 – Noxious Weed Management Trust Fund ......... 88 9. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 9 – Noxious Weed Seed Free Forage Act ................ 92 10. ARM: Title 4, Chapter 5, Part 3 – Noxious Weed Seed Free Forage ......................... 97 E. Vertebrate Pests: .............................................................................................................. 107 1. ARM: Title 4, Chapter 12, Part 2 – Feed Regulations ................................................ 107 2. MCA: Title 7, Chapter 22, Part 25 – County Vertebrate Pest Management ......... 110 3. ARM: Title 12, Chapter 6, Part 15 – Classification of Prohibited and Restricted Species: ................................................................................................................................. 111 4. ARM: Title 12, Chapter 6, Part 22 – Enforcement of Exotic Wildlife ..................... 112 5. MCA: Title 60, Chapter 7, Part 1 – Livestock on Highway ....................................... 120 6. MCA: Title 60, Chapter 7, Part 2 – Grazing Livestock .............................................. 121 7. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 12, Part 1 – Natural Areas ................................................... 122 2 MONTANA INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL COMPENDIUM 8. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 14, Part 1 – Rangeland Management ................................. 126 9. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 15, Part 1 – Conservation Districts .................................... 128 10. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 15, Part 2 – Creation of Conservation Districts ............... 131 11. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 15, Part 4 – Operation of Conservation Districts ............. 136 12. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 15, Part 9 – Coal Bed Methane Protection Act ................. 138 13. MCA: Title 76, Chapter 16, Part 1 – Grazing Conservation Act .............................. 140 14. MCA: Title 80, Chapter 7, Part 11 – Vertebrate Pest Management ........................ 144 15. MCA: Title 81, Chapter 4, Part 3 – Herd Districts ...................................................... 145 16. MCA: Title 81, Chapter 29, Part 1 – Feral Swine ........................................................ 155 17. MCA: Title 87, Chapter 5, Part 7 – Exotic Wildlife and Wildlife Protection ......... 156 FEDERAL AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................... 164 1. Title 39, Part 4, Chapter 30 – Alien Species Prevention and Enforcement Act 164 2. Title 7, Chapter 109A – Animal Damage Control Act ............................................ 164 3. Title 7, Chapter 109 – Animal Health Protection Act ............................................ 165 4. Title 16, Chapter 41 – Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act ................................ 167 5. Title 16, Chapter 35 – Endangered Species Act: ...................................................... 180 6. Executive Order 13112 – Invasive species: ............................................................... 191 7. Title 43, Chapter 35 – Federal Land Policy and Management Act: ..................... 195 8. Title 7, Chapter 61 – Federal Noxious Weed Act: .................................................... 198 9. Title 7, Chapter 37 – Federal Seed Act: ..................................................................... 201 10. Title 16, Chapter 36 – Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act: ..................................................................................................................................... 209 11. Title 16, Chapter 65 – International Forestry Cooperation Act: .......................... 210 12. Title 18, Chapter 3; Title 16, Chapter 53 – Lacey Act: ........................................... 211 13. Title 16, Chapter 67 – National Invasive Species Act: ........................................... 222 14. Title 42, Chapter 55 – National Environmental Policy Act: ................................. 226 15. Title 16, Chapter 67 – Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act: .................................................................................................................................... 227 16. Title 7, Chapter 104 – Noxious Weed Control and Eradication Act: ................... 231 17. Title 16, Chapter 3 – Organic Administration Act: ................................................. 235 18. Title 7, Chapter 104 – Plant Protection Act: ............................................................ 235 19. Title 16, Chapter 3B – Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act: ............ 254 20. Title 21, Chapter 5 – Virus-Serum-Toxin Act: ......................................................... 257 21. Title 16, Chapter 69 – Wild Bird Conservation Act: ............................................... 257 TRIBAL AUTHORITIES ............................................................................................. 258 1. Blackfeet Tribe ............................................................................................................... 258 2. Chippewa Cree Tribe (Rocky Boy) ............................................................................. 260 3. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) ................................................. 262 4. Crow Tribe ....................................................................................................................... 265 5. Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribe (Fort Belknap) ................................................ 269 6. Assiniboine and Sioux (Fort Peck) ............................................................................. 282 7. Little Shell Tribe ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Navigation on the Yellowstone River
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1950 History of navigation on the Yellowstone River John Gordon MacDonald The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation MacDonald, John Gordon, "History of navigation on the Yellowstone River" (1950). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2565. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2565 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY of NAVIGATION ON THE YELLOWoTGriE RIVER by John G, ^acUonald______ Ë.À., Jamestown College, 1937 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mas­ ter of Arts. Montana State University 1950 Approved: Q cxajJL 0. Chaiinmaban of Board of Examiners auaue ocnool UMI Number: EP36086 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Ois8<irtatk>n PuUishing UMI EP36086 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaits and Their Development in the Infraorder Pecora by Anne Innis
    Gaits and Their Development in the Infraorder Pecora by Anne Innis Dagg, M.A. THESIS Presented to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Waterloo in partial ful­ fillmenc of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosopty in Biolog The University of Waterloo February, 1967 The University of Waterloo requires the signature of all persons using this thesis. Please sign below, and give address and date. I hereby declare that I am the sole a�thor of this thesis. I authorize the University of Waterloo to lend it to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. Signature Abstract The gaits of twenty-eight species of the Infraorder Pecora are analyzed from motion picture sequences comprising over 45,000 frames. For each gait the percentage time spent on the various supporting legs during each stride and the order in which the combinations of supporting legs were used are tabulated. When possible the times for the strides are calculated. The walk patterns of each of the four families studied are shown to be statistically distinctive. Within each family, those members that live where the vegetation is so dense that they must rely on hearing to warn them of danger use a more stable walk than those species that inhabit open grasslands. A stable walk is that in which diagonal legs are used in·preference to lateral legs and three or four supporting legs are used rather than two. With a more stable walk, 4 species is able to pause quickly and to flee instantly if danger thr�atens.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting ANPC's Rare Plants Book
    Iris No. 69 • January 2013 The Alberta Native Plant Council Newsletter Revisiting ANPC’s Rare Plants Book by Linda Kershaw of Alberta, you will see that each Line drawing – Illustrations came consists of five main components: from a variety of sources, including an a block of text (name, description, ANHIC collection of commissioned and notes); a photo; a line drawing; drawings and a variety of previously an Alberta distribution map; a North published works (most notably the America distribution map. five-volume Flora of the Pacific Northwest published by the University of Text – Although the four editors Washington Press). The ANPC even compiled, organized, and edited the commissioned some original drawings information, there were also more to fill the last remaining gaps. than 30 additional Alberta botanists who contributed species accounts Alberta distribution map – The and other text (you can see their detailed Alberta dot maps were smiling faces on page 483 of the provided by ANHIC during the last book). Alberta Environment staff days of production. These were (first through the Recreation and generated electronically using the Protected Areas Program and later ANHIC/ACIMS (Alberta Conservation through the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Management System) Information Centre [ANHIC]) was database. key to the project, from generating When Rare Vascular Plants of Alberta the initial species list to sorting out North America distribution map was finally published in 2001, it was taxonomic problems and providing a – The Biota of North America the culmination of 10 years of work wide range of information. Also, several Program (BONAP) at the University of involving many dedicated volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Seasonality in Captive Wild Ruminants: Implications for Biogeographical Adaptation, Photoperiodic Control, and Life History
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Reproductive seasonality in captive wild ruminants: implications for biogeographical adaptation, photoperiodic control, and life history Zerbe, Philipp Abstract: Zur quantitativen Beschreibung der Reproduktionsmuster wurden Daten von 110 Wildwiederkäuer- arten aus Zoos der gemässigten Zone verwendet (dabei wurde die Anzahl Tage, an denen 80% aller Geburten stattfanden, als Geburtenpeak-Breite [BPB] definiert). Diese Muster wurden mit verschiede- nen biologischen Charakteristika verknüpft und mit denen von freilebenden Tieren verglichen. Der Bre- itengrad des natürlichen Verbreitungsgebietes korreliert stark mit dem in Menschenobhut beobachteten BPB. Nur 11% der Spezies wechselten ihr reproduktives Muster zwischen Wildnis und Gefangenschaft, wobei für saisonale Spezies die errechnete Tageslichtlänge zum Zeitpunkt der Konzeption für freilebende und in Menschenobhut gehaltene Populationen gleich war. Reproduktive Saisonalität erklärt zusätzliche Varianzen im Verhältnis von Körpergewicht und Tragzeit, wobei saisonalere Spezies für ihr Körpergewicht eine kürzere Tragzeit aufweisen. Rückschliessend ist festzuhalten, dass Photoperiodik, speziell die abso- lute Tageslichtlänge, genetisch fixierter Auslöser für die Fortpflanzung ist, und dass die Plastizität der Tragzeit unterstützend auf die erfolgreiche Verbreitung der Wiederkäuer in höheren Breitengraden wirkte. A dataset on 110 wild ruminant species kept in captivity in temperate-zone zoos was used to describe their reproductive patterns quantitatively (determining the birth peak breadth BPB as the number of days in which 80% of all births occur); then this pattern was linked to various biological characteristics, and compared with free-ranging animals. Globally, latitude of natural origin highly correlates with BPB observed in captivity, with species being more seasonal originating from higher latitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Mammals and Birds Recorded with Camera-Traps in the Paraguayan Humid Chaco
    Bol. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Parag. Vol. 24, nº 1 (Jul. 2020): 5-14100-100 Diversity of mammals and birds recorded with camera-traps in the Paraguayan Humid Chaco Diversidad de mamíferos y aves registrados con cámaras trampa en el Chaco Húmedo Paraguayo Andrea Caballero-Gini1,2,4, Diego Bueno-Villafañe1,2, Rafaela Laino1 & Karim Musálem1,3 1 Fundación Manuel Gondra, San José 365, Asunción, Paraguay. 2 Instituto de Investigación Biológica del Paraguay, Del Escudo 1607, Asunción, Paraguay. 3 WWF. Bernardino Caballero 191, Asunción, Paraguay. 4Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract.- Despite its vast extension and the rich fauna that it hosts, the Paraguayan Humid Chaco is one of the least studied ecoregions in the country. In this study, we provide a list of birds and medium-sized and large mammals recorded with camera traps in Estancia Playada, a private property located south of Occidental region in the Humid Chaco ecoregion of Paraguay. The survey was carried out from November 2016 to April 2017 with a total effort of 485 camera-days. We recorded 15 mammal and 20 bird species, among them the bare-faced curassow (Crax fasciolata), the giant anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla), and the neotropical otter (Lontra longicaudis); species that are globally threatened in different dregrees. Our results suggest that Estancia Playada is a site with the potential for the conservation of birds and mammals in the Humid Chaco of Paraguay. Keywords: Species inventory, Mammals, Birds, Cerrito, Presidente Hayes. Resumen.- A pesar de su vasta extensión y la rica fauna que alberga, el Chaco Húmedo es una de las ecorregiones menos estudiadas en el país.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Babesia Spp. in Free-Ranging Pukus, Kobus Vardonii, on a Game Ranch in Zambia
    ISSN (Print) 0023-4001 ISSN (Online) 1738-0006 Korean J Parasitol Vol. 49, No. 4: 437-440, December 2011 ▣ BRIEF COMMUNICATION http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2011.49.4.437 Detection of Babesia spp. in Free-Ranging Pukus, Kobus vardonii, on a Game Ranch in Zambia 1, 2 2 3 Hetron Mweemba Munang’andu *, Musso Munyeme , Andrew Mubila Nambota , King Shimumbo Nalubamba and Victor M. Siamudaala4 1Norwegian School of Veterinary Sciences, Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Section of Aquatic Medicine and Nutrition, P.O. Box 8146 Dep NO-033, Oslo, Norway; 2Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia; 3Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia; 4Kavango Transfrontier Wild Animal, Gaborone, Botswana Abstract: Babesia spp. were detected from 4 asymptomatic pukus captured on a game ranch in central Zambia in Octo- ber 2008. Blood smears were examined in 4 species of aymptomatic free-ranging antelopes, namely the puku (Kobus vor danii), reedbuck (Redunca arundinum), bushbuck (Tragelaphus sylvaticus), and kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), and showed the presence of Babesia parasites only in the puku. In the puku, the prevalence of babesiosis was estimated at 33.3% (n=12), while the overall prevalence in all examined animals was 8.5% (n=47). The parasites showed morphologi- cal characteristics of paired ring-like stages with the length varying between 1.61 µm and 3.02 µm (mean=2.12 µm, n= 27; SD=0.76 µm). Both the infected and non-infected pukus showed good body condition scores (BCS), while the domi- nant tick species detected from all animals were Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Rhipicephalus spp., and Boophilus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochely Santos Morandini
    Rochely Santos Morandini Diversidade funcional das aves do Cerrado com simulações da perda de fisionomias campestres e de espécies ameaçadas: implicações para a conservação. (VERSÃO CORRIGIDA – versão original disponível na Biblioteca do IB-USP e na Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações (BDTD) da USP) Functional Diversity of Cerrado birds with a simulation of the loss of open areas and endangered species: implications for conservation. São Paulo 2013 Rochely Santos Morandini Diversidade funcional das aves do Cerrado com simulações da perda de fisionomias campestres e de espécies ameaçadas: implicações para a conservação. Functional Diversity of Cerrado birds with a simulation of the loss of open areas and endangered species: implications for conservation. Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo para a obtenção do Título de Mestre em Ciências, na Área de Ecologia. Orientador: Prof. Dr. José Carlos Motta Junior. São Paulo 2013 Morandini, Rochely Santos Diversidade funcional das aves do Cerrado com simulações da perda de fisionomias campestres e de espécies ameaçadas: implicações para conservação. 112 páginas Dissertação (Mestrado) - Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Ecologia. 1. Aves 2. Cerrado 3. Diversidade Funcional I. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Biociências. Departamento de Ecologia Comitê de Acompanhamento: Luís Fábio Silveira Marco Antônio P. L. Batalha Comissão Julgadora: ________________________ ________________________ Prof(a). Dr. Marco Ant ônio Prof(a). Dr. Sergio Tadeu Meirelles Monteiro Granzinolli ____________________________________ Orientador: Prof. Dr. José Carlos Motta Junior Dedicatória A melhor lembrança que tenho da infância são as paisagens de minha terra natal. Dedico este estudo ao Cerrado, com seus troncos retorcidos, seu amanhecer avermelhado, paisagens onde habitam aves tão encantadoras que me tonteiam.
    [Show full text]
  • References for Montana Plant Community Field Guide
    References For Montana Plant Community Field Guide Achuff, P. L. 1989. Old-growth forests of the Canadian Rocky Mountain National Parks. Natural Areas Journal 9:12-26. Agee, J. K., and J. Kertis. 1987. Forest types of the north Cascades National Park Service complex. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1520-1530. Aiken, S. G., M. J. Dallwitz, C. L. McJannet, and L. L. Consaul. 1996 onwards. Festuca of North America: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval, 2nd Version: URL, April 1998. http://biodiversity.uno.edu/delta/. Aiken, S.G. and S. J. Darbyshire. 1990. Fescue Grasses of Canada. Agriculture Canada Publication 1844/E. Aldous, A. E., and H. L. Shantz. 1924. Types of vegetation in the semiarid portion of the United States and their economic significance. Journal of Agricultural Research. 28(2):99-125. Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-123, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp. Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-123. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp. Alexander, R. R., G. R. Hoffman, and J. M. Wirsing. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Medicine Bow National Forest in southeastern Wyoming: A habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-271. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 39 pp. Antos, J. A. 1977. Grand fir (Abies grandis (Douglas) Forbes) forests of the Swan Valley, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Community Diversity in Three Habitat Types in an Ecological Corridor in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones Province, Argentina
    Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science Vol.8 (4): 955-974, 2015 Research Article Bird community diversity in three habitat types in an ecological corridor in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones province, Argentina Flavia Romina Barzan1*, Julián Martín Emanuel Baigorria2 and Roberto Fabián Bó1 1 Grupo de Investigaciones en Ecología de Humedales (GIEH-CONICET)/Laboratorio de Ecología Regional, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes y Av. Cantilo s/n, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 2Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico (CeIBA-CONICET), Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú (3370), Misiones, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author:[email protected] Abstract The Atlantic Forest is one of the most threatened biodiversity hotspots in the world due to habitat fragmentation. Restoration and connectivity of forest fragments are crucial to maintain viable populations of forest-dependent species. During winter and summer, we studied the bird diversity, its components and composition (including specialist and generalist species) in three different vegetation types: mature forest (MF), secondary forest (SF) and grassland (G) of an ecological corridor in Misiones, Argentina. We determined the influence of alpha diversity (of each habitat) and beta diversity (species turnover between habitats) on gamma diversity (regional diversity in the corridor), to provide conservation management recommendations. MF showed the highest values of bird diversity, richness, evenness and abundance, followed by SF and G, in both seasons. Only MF showed a possible seasonal variation in diversity and richness. The species composition of SF was similar to MF.
    [Show full text]