DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Responses to US-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Responses to US-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific Regional Responses to U.S.-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific STUDY OVERVIEW AND CONCLUSIONS Bonny Lin, Michael S. Chase, Jonah Blank, Cortez A. Cooper III, Derek Grossman, Scott W. Harold, Jennifer D. P. Moroney, Lyle J. Morris, Logan Ma, Paul Orner, Alice Shih, Soo Kim C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4412 For more information on this series, visit www.rand.org/US-PRC-influence Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0518-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: globe: jcrosemann/GettyImages; flags: luzitanija/Adobe Stock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface What are influence and competition for influence? What are the United States and China competing for in the Indo-Pacific? How can we measure influence? How do countries in the Indo-Pacific view the United States, China, and U.S.-China competition? How could the United States work more effectively with allies and partners? In this report, we attempt to answer these questions as part of a broader study of how U.S. allies and partners are responding to U.S.-China competition. The other reports in this series are available at www.rand.org/US-PRC-influence. The research reported here was sponsored by Brig Gen Michael P. Winkler (PACAF/A5/8) and conducted within the Strategy and Doctrine Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE as part of a fiscal year 2019 project titled “Regional Responses to U.S.-China Competition in the Indo- Pacific” that assists the Air Force in evaluating U.S. and Chinese influence and assessing possible Air Force, joint force, and U.S. government options. This report should be of value to the national security community and interested members of the general public, especially those with an interest in U.S.-China competition in the Indo- Pacific. Comments are welcome and should be sent to the project leader, Bonny Lin. Research was completed in September 2019. RAND Project AIR FORCE RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Corporation, is the Department of the Air Force’s (DAF’s) federally funded research and development center for studies and analyses, supporting both the United States Air Force and the United States Space Force. PAF provides the DAF with independent analyses of policy alternatives affecting the development, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future air, space, and cyber forces. Research is conducted in four programs: Force Modernization and Employment; Manpower, Personnel, and Training; Resource Management; and Strategy and Doctrine. The research reported here was prepared under contract FA7014-16-D-1000. Additional information about PAF is available on our website: www.rand.org/paf This report documents work originally shared with the DAF in September 2019. The draft report, issued in January 2020, was reviewed by formal peer reviewers and DAF subject-matter experts. iii Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................ iii Figures............................................................................................................................................ vi Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vii Summary ...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ xiii Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... xiv 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Research Scope, Design, and Methodology ............................................................................... 4 Focused on Peacetime Competition for Influence in Southeast Asia ....................................................... 4 Research Design and Methodology .......................................................................................................... 5 3. What Are Influence and Competition for Influence? ................................................................. 8 Influence: Ability to Shape the Behavior of Other Actors ....................................................................... 8 Competition for Influence: Competition over Partner Alignment ............................................................ 8 4. What Are the United States and China Competing for in the Indo-Pacific? ............................ 12 Divergent U.S. and Chinese Visions and Objectives for Southeast Asia ............................................... 12 Using Overlapping Priorities to Assess Intensity of U.S.-China Competition ....................................... 27 5. How Can We Measure and Assess Influence? ......................................................................... 29 Framework for Measuring and Assessing Relative Influence ................................................................ 29 “Winning” the Competition for Influence .............................................................................................. 33 6. How Do Regional Countries View U.S. Versus PRC Influence? ............................................. 35 Regional Views of Relative U.S. and Chinese Influence ....................................................................... 35 Chinese Views of Relative U.S. and Chinese Influence ......................................................................... 50 Comparing Regional and PRC Perspectives ........................................................................................... 61 7. How Could the United States Work More Effectively with Allies and Partners? .................... 66 Direct, Bilateral Cooperation .................................................................................................................. 66 Working with Allies and Close Partners in Third Countries .................................................................. 75 8. Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 84 What Are Influence and Competition for Influence? ............................................................................. 84 What Are the United States and China Competing for in the Indo-Pacific? .......................................... 85 How Can We Measure and Assess Influence? ....................................................................................... 85 How Do Regional Countries View U.S. Versus PRC Influence? .......................................................... 86 How Could the United States Work More Effectively with Allies and Partners? .................................. 88 Appendix A. Basic Identification of U.S. Objectives ................................................................... 92 Appendix B. Detailed Framework Variable Coding ..................................................................... 93 iv Appendix C. Chinese Views of Current U.S., Allied, and Partner Efforts ................................. 102 Appendix D. Top U.S. Allied and Partner Security Providers for Southeast Asia ..................... 105 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 108 v Figures Figure 1.1. The Indo-Pacific Region and Countries Examined in This Study ............................... 2 Figure 4.1. Strategic Chokepoints in Southeast Asia .................................................................... 15 Figure 4.2. Assessing Intensity of U.S.-China Competition (2018) ............................................. 27 Figure 5.1. Notional Ways to Conceptualize Sufficient U.S. Versus Chinese Influence ............. 34 Figure 6.1. PLA Bilateral Service Military Exercises in the Indo-Pacific (2002–2018) .............. 50 Figure 6.2. Perceptions of U.S. and PRC Ability to Incentivize or Coerce Southeast Asia (Notional, 2018) .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guía COL MUN 2021
    CNCMUN IV Background Guide Council of Leaders COL Presidents: Gabriel Hernández and Isabella Ospina Gabriela Conde and Tomás Ortiz Executive editors Gabriel Hernández Isabella Ospina Sub-editor Sub-editor Table of contents I. Letter from the chair II. Introduction to the committee III. First agenda: Middle East and Israel Conflict A. Introduction B. History C. Current Situation i. Right of return ii. Security and Terrorism D. Different Perspectives IV Second agenda: Iran and USA crisis A. Introduction B. History i. Precedents of the Iran-U.S.A. relation ii. Incidents iii. Nuclear weapons development C. Current Situation D. Different Perspectives V. Information of Mandatory Revision VI. QARMA’S (Questions a Resolution Must Answer) VII. Bibliography I. Letter from the chair Estimated delegates, We are Gabriel Hernández and Isabella Ospina, and as presidents of the committee of Council of Leaders, we’d like to extend to you a warm welcome to the 4th edition of CNCMUN. This time, the topics to be discussed are related to the Middle East conflict with other countries such as Israel and the United States - Iran crisis. We are appreciative to receive delegates that are open to an active participation and take this as learning and enriching experience. We are looking forward to achieve this committee's goals and make this a joyful experience for everyone. We are expecting to see you soon. II. Introduction to the committee Council of leaders is an experimental committee in the Model of United Nations that consists in setting out a scene in which world leaders with greater significance discuss and debate about current controversial and important issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Solutionsin Building CPEC-A Flagship Of
    Issue , Working paper CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE Challenges and CHINA-PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDORSolutionsIn Building CPEC-A Flagship of BRI Written by: Yasir Arrfat Research Coordinator CoE CPEC Minitry of Planning, Pakistan Institute Development Reform of Development Economics Challenges and Solutions in Building CPEC-A Flagship of BRI Yasir Arrfat Research Coordinator Centre of Excellence (CoE) for China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Islamabad, Pakistan, [email protected] Abstract-One of the OBOR pilot corridors out of the six corridors is CPEC. The CPEC has been initiated in 2013 and due to its speedy progress, CPEC is now vastly considered as the “flagship” project among the OBOR projects. The CPEC initiatives include; development of Gwadar Port, road, rail and optical fiber connectivity, energy corridor and Special Economic Zones development for bilateral benefits to attain inclusive growth and regional harmonization. Before the inception of CPEC, the growth of Pakistan was curtailed by two major bottlenecks; acute energy shortages and weak local and regional connectivity infrastructures. In 2013, CPEC came with 59 billion USDs under OBOR and it has been eliminating all major economic bottlenecks. This paper sheds light on the BRI with deep focusing on CPEC. It further represents the Pakistan’s improving economic indicators through CPEC. This paper will also examine some key challenges and their solutions in building CPEC. Key Words-BRI, Challenges, Connectivity, Corridors, CPEC, Global Competitive Index (GCI), Investment, Infrastructure, OBOR I. INTRODUCTION The Globalization has brought vast changes in global economy and has directed the evolution to a boundary less development. This phenomenon has significantly amplified the maritime trade from 2.37 billion tons of freight to 5.88 billion tons of freight moving through maritime routes.
    [Show full text]
  • China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States
    Order Code RL32688 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Updated April 4, 2006 Bruce Vaughn (Coordinator) Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Wayne M. Morrison Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Summary Southeast Asia has been considered by some to be a region of relatively low priority in U.S. foreign and security policy. The war against terror has changed that and brought renewed U.S. attention to Southeast Asia, especially to countries afflicted by Islamic radicalism. To some, this renewed focus, driven by the war against terror, has come at the expense of attention to other key regional issues such as China’s rapidly expanding engagement with the region. Some fear that rising Chinese influence in Southeast Asia has come at the expense of U.S. ties with the region, while others view Beijing’s increasing regional influence as largely a natural consequence of China’s economic dynamism. China’s developing relationship with Southeast Asia is undergoing a significant shift. This will likely have implications for United States’ interests in the region. While the United States has been focused on Iraq and Afghanistan, China has been evolving its external engagement with its neighbors, particularly in Southeast Asia. In the 1990s, China was perceived as a threat to its Southeast Asian neighbors in part due to its conflicting territorial claims over the South China Sea and past support of communist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • International Geneva
    International Geneva Directory of Geneva Global Health Actors World Economic Forum | WEF http://www.weforum.org and https://www.weforum.org/system-initiatives/shaping-the-future- of-health-and-healthcare 91- 93 Route de la Capite | CH-1223 Cologny | Geneva Tel +41 22 869 1212 | Fax +41 22 786 2744 | mail: [email protected] BACKGROUND AND MISSION The World Economic Forum is an independent international organisation committed to improving the state of the world by engaging leaders in partnerships to shape global, regional and industry agendas. WEF is best known for its annual meeting in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland. The organisation is impartial, independent and not tied to any specific agendas, governments or interests. It is an officially recognised International Institution for Public- Private Cooperation, being the only international organisation serving in this role. AREAS OF INTEREST Changing economy and the fourth industrial revolution Global commons Global security Public-private partnerships HEALTH-RELATED ACTIVITIES Global health is one of the priority areas of WEF, and the Shaping the Future of Health and Healthcare system initiative provides a framework for health promotion and disease prevention along with broad networks and opportunities for public-private cooperation. It aims to ensure that people are healthier and can access the necessary care to fulfil their potential. It addresses the challenge of providing health for the expanding global population, and focuses on both individual and community-related aspects of health. Its global platform includes stakeholders from public, private and civil society spheres, with focus on health, food and beverages, sports, insurance, telecommunications and infra-structure. The goal is to create a credible long term narrative that considers health and health security as an integral part of economic growth and profitability, and to share insights and knowledge arising from the discussions for shaping the global health agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • The China-Iran Partnership in a Regional Context
    Occasional Paper Series No. 38 l September 2020 Last Among Equals: The China-Iran Partnership in a Regional Context By Lucille Greer and Esfandyar Batmanghelidj INTRODUCTION to reorient the balance of power in the Middle East in defiance of the United States, even In early June 2020, a scan of an 18-page though China’s policy is not to make alliances in document began circulating on Iranian social the region. media. Titled “Final Draft of Iran-China Strategic Partnership Deal,” the document, which While that the leaked document included no appeared to have been leaked from the Iranian financial targets, many news reports stated that Ministry of Foreign Affairs, immediately caused the deal would see China invest $400 billion in a firestorm among the general public and Iran, a completely fictitious number that can politicians alike. Soon, the international media be traced back to a dubious article published picked up the document and headlines blared in the spring of 2019.1 Such errors reflect the that Iran and China were forging a new “alliance” long-running overestimation of China’s economic Middle East Program Occasional Paper Series No. 38 l September 2020 engagement not just in Iran, but also in the wider China’s measured approach to building relationships Middle East. Reporting on potential or promised with several countries despite the mutual financing or investment is rarely balanced by the antagonism in the region. actual amount of capital committed and how it is applied across the region. This is the crucial context that is absent in most recent analysis of this deal and its ramifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Mary Beard Travel to China to Teach in the Peking Area. Flora Is 45 Years Old and Mary Is 32
    1914 August -Flora and Mary Beard travel to China to teach in the Peking area. Flora is 45 years old and Mary is 32. Rise of Japanese power in China (through 1918) WWI begins Panama Canal opens Ernest Shackleton begins his Antarctic expedition and does not return until 1917. Willard is living in Foochow, China while Ellen and the children remain in the U.S. and live in Putnam, CT Willard is 49 years old, Ellen- 46, Phebe- 19, Gould- 18, Geraldine- 16, Dorothy- 13, Marjorie- 8, Kathleen- 6. 50th Wedding Anniversary invitation for Oliver Gould and Nancy Maria Beard. [From the collection of Virginia Beard Van Andel.] Oliver Gould Beard and Nancy Maria Nichols 50th Wedding anniversary 1914 [Photos from the collection of John and Nancy Butte.] ***** [This letter dated March 15, 1914 was written from Foochow, China by Willard to his 8 year old daughter, Marjorie. He tells about a Chinese family that lost their 2 daughters to a sudden illness and how Mr. and Mrs. Christian has to be quarantined in Willard’s house because of it. He will have a Mrs. and Miss Pitcher as boarders in his mountain house this summer. Letter donated to Yale by family in 2006.] American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions Foochow College President‟s Office Foochow, China March 15th 1914. Dear- to whom shall I address this- nothing came from Putnam this last week-let me see whose turn it is to have the letter according to my correspondence register.- it‟s Marjorie‟s turn so here it goes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ships!), Maps, Lighthouses
    Price £2.00 (free to regular customers) 03.03.21 List up-dated Winter 2020 S H I P S V E S S E L S A N D M A R I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E 03.03.20 Update PHILATELIC SUPPLIES (M.B.O'Neill) 359 Norton Way South Letchworth Garden City HERTS ENGLAND SG6 1SZ (Telephone; 01462-684191 during my office hours 9.15-3.15pm Mon.-Fri.) Web-site: www.philatelicsupplies.co.uk email: [email protected] TERMS OF BUSINESS: & Notes on these lists: (Please read before ordering). 1). All stamps are unmounted mint unless specified otherwise. Prices in Sterling Pounds we aim to be HALF-CATALOGUE PRICE OR UNDER 2). Lists are updated about every 12-14 weeks to include most recent stock movements and New Issues; they are therefore reasonably accurate stockwise 100% pricewise. This reduces the need for "credit notes" and refunds. Alternatives may be listed in case some items are out of stock. However, these popular lists are still best used as soon as possible. Next listings will be printed in 4, 8 & 12 months time so please indicate when next we should send a list on your order form. 3). New Issues Services can be provided if you wish to keep your collection up to date on a Standing Order basis. Details & forms on request. Regret we do not run an on approval service. 4). All orders on our order forms are attended to by return of post. We will keep a photocopy it and return your annotated original.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-China Relations: the Search for a New Equilibrium Ryan Hass
    U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS: THE SEARCH FOR A NEW EQUILIBRIUM RYAN HASS FEBRUARY 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY it did not actively seek to change the existing order on a magnitude corresponding to China’s ambitions For over 40 years following President Richard Nixon’s today, nor did it have the capabilities to do so.) Third, first tentative steps in China in 1972, the relationship China’s rise from a low-wage manufacturing hub to between the United States and the People’s Republic a technology power has introduced friction into the of China (PRC) navigated many ups and downs, but economic relationship, as both economies increasingly generally developed along a trajectory of deepening move from being complementary to competitive with social, economic, people-to-people, and diplomatic one another. And fourth, unresolved questions about ties. In recent years, that trajectory has been broken. the nature of ideological or systems competition are Now, the relationship has reached what respected fueling tensions. China scholar David M. Lampton describes as a “tipping point.”1 This paper will explore how the relationship Looking ahead, the paper argues that Washington and reached its current moment, why the relationship has Beijing each will need to take steps to allow conditions been nose-diving, and what steps the United States to emerge over time that would make possible the could take to protect its interests in its relationship emergence of a new equilibrium for the relationship. with China going forward. Such an outcome would bolster each side’s confidence in their ability to protect their own vital interests, This paper argues that neither the United States prevent a mutually harmful deterioration in relations, nor China own a monopoly of responsibility for the and enable both sides to focus more on improving downturn in relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapprochement Between America and China During the Nixon
    Bilge Strateji,Bilge Cilt Strateji, 9, Sayı Cilt16, Bahar9, Sayı 2017, 16, Bahar ss.131-147 2017 Rapprochement between America and China during the Nixon Era: A Product of Timing or the Leadership? Nixon Dönemi Amerika ve Çin Arasındaki Uzlaşma: Zamanın bir Ürünü mü yoksa Liderlik mi? Teslim: 31 Mayıs 2016 Onay: 23 Mart 2017 Ali Onur ÖZÇELİK* Abstract This article explores the rapprochement between America and China in the 1970s. By ending two-decade old antagonism and realizing the most impor- tant strategic shift of the Cold War era, both states have changed the course of the world politics since the middle of the Cold War. In elaborating one of the historical events in American foreign policy, the article seeks to find an answer for one big question: Was Nixon a unique leader to initiate the U.S. opening to China or was it purely a product of timing? The findings suggest that although timing provided important motivation for rapprochement, this had not been possible if Nixon did not show his determination. Keywords: : Rapprochement between America and China, Leadership, Re- alpolitik, American Foreign Policy. Öz Bu makale, Amerika ve Çin arasında 1970’lerdeki uzlaşmayı incelemekte- dir. Yirmi yıllık düşmanlığı sonlandıran ve Soğuk Savaş’ın en önemli strate- jik kayışını gerçekleştiren iki devlet, Soğuk Savaş’ın ortasından itibaren dünya politikasının gidişatını değiştirmiştir. Amerikan dış politikasındaki en önemli tarihi olaylardan bir tanesini ele alan bu makele, büyük bir so- ruya: Amerikanın Çin’e açılması için Nixon eşsiz bir lider miydi yoksa bu süreç tamamen zamanın bir ürünü müydü? cevap aramaktadır. Bulgular, za- manlama uzlaşma için önemli bir motivasyon sağlamasına rağmen, Nixon’ın kararlılığı olmasa bu uzlaşmanın imkansız olduğunu önermektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter-Insurgency Vs. Counter-Terrorism in Mindanao
    THE PHILIPPINES: COUNTER-INSURGENCY VS. COUNTER-TERRORISM IN MINDANAO Asia Report N°152 – 14 May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. ISLANDS, FACTIONS AND ALLIANCES ................................................................ 3 III. AHJAG: A MECHANISM THAT WORKED .......................................................... 10 IV. BALIKATAN AND OPLAN ULTIMATUM............................................................. 12 A. EARLY SUCCESSES..............................................................................................................12 B. BREAKDOWN ......................................................................................................................14 C. THE APRIL WAR .................................................................................................................15 V. COLLUSION AND COOPERATION ....................................................................... 16 A. THE AL-BARKA INCIDENT: JUNE 2007................................................................................17 B. THE IPIL INCIDENT: FEBRUARY 2008 ..................................................................................18 C. THE MANY DEATHS OF DULMATIN......................................................................................18 D. THE GEOGRAPHICAL REACH OF TERRORISM IN MINDANAO ................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Shanghai, China Overview Introduction
    Shanghai, China Overview Introduction The name Shanghai still conjures images of romance, mystery and adventure, but for decades it was an austere backwater. After the success of Mao Zedong's communist revolution in 1949, the authorities clamped down hard on Shanghai, castigating China's second city for its prewar status as a playground of gangsters and colonial adventurers. And so it was. In its heyday, the 1920s and '30s, cosmopolitan Shanghai was a dynamic melting pot for people, ideas and money from all over the planet. Business boomed, fortunes were made, and everything seemed possible. It was a time of breakneck industrial progress, swaggering confidence and smoky jazz venues. Thanks to economic reforms implemented in the 1980s by Deng Xiaoping, Shanghai's commercial potential has reemerged and is flourishing again. Stand today on the historic Bund and look across the Huangpu River. The soaring 1,614-ft/492-m Shanghai World Financial Center tower looms over the ambitious skyline of the Pudong financial district. Alongside it are other key landmarks: the glittering, 88- story Jinmao Building; the rocket-shaped Oriental Pearl TV Tower; and the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The 128-story Shanghai Tower is the tallest building in China (and, after the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, the second-tallest in the world). Glass-and-steel skyscrapers reach for the clouds, Mercedes sedans cruise the neon-lit streets, luxury- brand boutiques stock all the stylish trappings available in New York, and the restaurant, bar and clubbing scene pulsates with an energy all its own. Perhaps more than any other city in Asia, Shanghai has the confidence and sheer determination to forge a glittering future as one of the world's most important commercial centers.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Emission Reduction Targets of “Belt and Road” Countries Based on Their NDC Reports
    sustainability Article An Analysis of the Emission Reduction Targets of “Belt and Road” Countries Based on Their NDC Reports Jing Wu 1,2, Guan Kaixuan 1, Qianting Zhu 3, Wang Zheng 1,2,4, Yuanhua Chang 3 and Xiong Wen 5,* 1 Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (G.K.); [email protected] (W.Z.) 2 School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; [email protected] (Q.Z.); [email protected] (Y.C.) 4 School of Geography, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China 5 School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 October 2019; Accepted: 4 December 2019; Published: 9 December 2019 Abstract: The emission reduction targets articulated in the nationally determined contribution (NDC) reports of the “Belt and Road” countries, which have joined China in an international alliance to promote green development, are studied in this paper. Our findings indicate that the most commonly adopted emission reduction targets are relative to emissions in the base year and to baseline scenarios. Approximately half of these countries request technological and financial support from the international community in their NDC reports. Greenhouse gas inventory accounting, and data management, modeling, and tools are the most commonly identified technological needs. Moreover, the NDC reports indicate that $2.88 trillion of financial support is explicitly required, while a reliable international financial assistance and technology transfer would enable considerably higher emission reduction targets to be reached in Belt and Road countries.
    [Show full text]