<<

Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program 2004 Summary Report

Final Report

Prepared for Northeast Municipal Water District Hughes Springs, Texas 75656

This Report was Prepared in Cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and Financed Through Grants from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

by

Paul Price Associates, Inc. 3006 Bee Caves Road, Suite D-230 Austin, TX 78746 (512) 329-0155 [email protected]

August 31, 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Activities and Accomplishments

The Texas Legislature passed the Texas Clean Rivers Act (Senate Bill 818) in 1991. This Act established the Texas Clean Rivers Program (CRP) under the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The Municipal Water District (NETMWD) contracts with the TCEQ to perform the Texas Clean Rivers Act of 1991 requirements to identify and prioritize water quality problems on behalf of the Cypress Creek Basin. The primary goal of this partnership is the establishment of a comprehensive water resources planning and management program that integrates water quality and water quantity issues within the basin.

The Clean Rivers Program water quality monitoring in the Cypress Creek Basin during the basin summary report period of 1998-2002 has taken place through a cooperative program directed by Northeast Texas Municipal Water District (NETMWD). Participants assisting NETMWD in planning, data collection, analysis, and reporting include Paul Price Associates, Inc. (PPAI), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), the Clean Rivers Program Steering Committee members, basin partners Lake Institute (CLI) and affiliates, Pilgrims Pride Corporation, Franklin County Water District (FCWD), the City of Marshall, the City of Longview, Titus County Fresh Water District #1, Lone Star Steel, Texas Utilities (TXU), and AEP Swepco.

The goal of the Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program is to provide the appropriate, quality assured data to allow continuing assessment and management of water quality in the Cypress Creek Basin. Detailed objectives of this monitoring program include: · Establishment of a long-term monitoring program for the Basin, · Focus on and provision for local participation in monitoring, · Provision of reliable information to the public to enhance awareness and knowledge of water quality conditions in the Basin, · Monitoring and evaluation of water quality trends, · Identification of the nature and source of water quality problems that may result in significant impairments, · Evaluation of the applicability of Texas Surface Water Quality Standards to specific water bodies in the Basin, · Evaluation of permit requests with respect to water quality conditions and trends in the Basin, and, · Provision of data to support the development of cost-effective water quality management programs.

Identification of the nature and source of water quality problems along with evaluation based on the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards helps to assess permit requirements with respect to water quality conditions and trends in the Basin, and provides data to support the development of cost-effective water quality management programs.

A number of studies have been conducted in the Cypress Creek Basin in the last five years. The focus of these studies has been the improvement of water quality within the Basin, and documentation of watershed conditions both current and historical. Several of these studies have been produced within the Clean Rivers Program as special studies. Special studies are additional water monitoring projects designed to address a specific concern or to provide additional information as a result of a previous monitoring effort or a current issue affecting water quality. As part of the Texas Clean Rivers Program, these special studies deal with specific water quality issues or are used to support other programs (e.g., Total Maximum Daily Load development) addressing water quality issues in the Basin. Water quality and associated studies completed in the last five years include the following:

Hughes Springs Receiving Waters Assessment

TCEQ Region 5 staff performed the Hughes Springs Receiving Waters Assessment (RWA) in June 1998 to provide supporting aquatic life use information for the City of Hughes Springs wastewater permit renewal. This RWA showed that Hughes Creek, upstream from the discharge outfall, exhibited an “Intermediate” to “High” aquatic life-use rating when fish, macroinvertebrates, and habitat were evaluated.

Caddo Lake Organic Contaminant Study

This special study was designed as a preliminary survey of to assess the presence of specific organic compounds in waters and sediment adjacent to the Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant (LHAAP). During the summer and fall of 1998, surface water and sediment samples were taken from Harrison and Goose Prairie Creek, which were waterbodies identified as being significantly contaminated with these compounds by the U.S. Corps of Engineers. The laboratory results for all samples collected during this Special Study were below detection limits. The report recommended further organic analysis studies surrounding the LHAAP. As a result, the TCEQ staff initiated an intensive study for ammonia perchlorate within Caddo Lake near the LHAAP.

Nutrient Study in Lake O’ the Pines

In anticipation of the data needs for TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) development, the CRP directed monitoring where possible, to address those needs. A nutrient study was developed to provide basic information about the Lake O’ the Pines, and its present nutrient load and trophic condition by identifying and quantifying the major nutrient storage pools (e.g., sediments, water, biomass), and plant biomass, distribution, taxonomy, photosynthesis and respiration in the water column. Additionally, bathymetric mapping of the lake, quarterly vegetation mapping, diurnal dissolved oxygen/temperature profiles, primary productivity studies and sediment nutrient parameter analyses were conducted. The data obtained during this study were used as part of the TMDL Development Workplan for the Lake O’ the Pines.

Poultry Operations Water Quality Impact Study. Appendix C of Poultry Operations Study, Report to the 76th session of the Texas Legislature.

This study examined existing or potential adverse impacts on water quality and biological communities in the Cypress Creek Basin as a result of concentrated poultry production and litter disposal activities. This involved the selection and sampling of four sub-watersheds in the basin, development of a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database involving physiographic, vegetational, and landuse characteristics, and presentation of results and analysis of the resulting water quality data. The study documented the distribution of poultry production facilities and the magnitude of soiled litter disposal activity in the four study watersheds. Comparative monitoring results indicated that while indicators of intensive agricultural activity (nutrient and chlorophyll a concentrations, depressed dissolved oxygen concentrations) were generally present in Lilly and Prairie Creeks, whiuch drained the more intensively developed of the study watersheds.

Special Study of Poultry Operations

This special study, funded by Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, was an extension of the previously mentioned special study mandated by the 76th Session of the Texas Legislature and was conducted under the directive of the TCEQ Clean Rivers Program with the objective to identify any water quality impacts specific to poultry production operations in the Cypress Creek Basin. The four sub-watersheds investigated during the original TCEQ study and a fifth sub-watershed downstream of the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Walker Creek Poultry Processing Facility were selected for monthly field parameter measurements and conventional water quality data collection. Habitat and biological assessments were conducted once during 2000 and 2001. Examination of poultry production and land disposal of litter for the two study periods was compared. The laboratory results showed little evidence of change in water quality parameters. No trends over time were evident in any of the data assessed, and nutrient parameters and dissolved oxygen levels exhibited similar patterns among stations during both periods. The Aquatic Life Use (ALU) scores based on the fish and benthic macroinvertebrate community assemblage at all five special study streams showed no dramatic change from the values observed from the 1997-1998 study and remain in the range between Intermediate and High integrity classes. The fecal coliform minimum and maximum concentrations were lower during 2000-2001 sample period than during the initial study possibly due to the relatively lower stream flow regime rather than the general decrease in land disposal of chicken litter.

Tankersley Creek Indicator Bacteria Special Study, Upper Watershed

Tankersley Creek was placed on the TCEQ’s 2000 303(d) list for exceeding bacteria levels established for safe contact recreation and remained on the 2002 303(d) list due to insufficient bacteriological data. A 12-month special study of the bacteriological water quality on the upper Big Cypress Creek including Tankersley Creek was conducted during FY2003 to determine if the impairment was warranted. The study was initiated and monitored under dry and wet weather conditions with the goal of obtaining a broader assessment of the bacterial water quality conditions in the two primary streams draining the Mount Pleasant, Texas area and of the reach of Big Cypress Creek receiving that drainage. The results of this special study supported the 2002 303(d) listing of Tankersley Creek in terms of distribution but did not determine the possible sources. Therefore, a new special study is being developed to further characterize the bacteriological water quality in relation to land use type in the upper reaches of Tankersley Creek.

Lake O’ the Pines Watershed TMDL Project

Lake O’ the Pines was determined to have impaired water quality, consequently a TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) project was instituted. This monitoring was administered through the TCEQ and its TMDL program. The TMDL monitoring program consisted of base flow and wet weather stream flow monitoring within the Lake O' the Pines Watershed. Automated battery- operated sampling systems supported stream flow and wet weather monitoring by collecting detailed information on rainfall-runoff relationships and allowing simultaneous sampling of storm runoff across the watershed. All of the TMDL field sampling and the final TMDL report have been completed at this time. Analysis of monitoring data and operation of models of the hydraulic and kinetic behavior of the watershed-stream network- system indicated that Lake O’ the Pines is being adversely by phosphorus loading. A reduction in the 2000 total phosphorus load to Lake O’ the Pines of 58% was estimated to be needed to allow Segment 0404 to meet its dissolved oxygen standard at all fixed stations.

OTHER WATER QUALITY-RELATED PROJECTS

Strube Egg Farm Water Quality Study, Camp and Upshur Counties, Texas

Water quality and biological communities were sampled over a period of one year to evaluate conditions during a seasonal cycle for comparison with data collected by the TCEQ regional office and the Clean Rivers Program (CRP) in the Cypress Creek Basin. The objective of the study was to document the water quality and aquatic life use integrity of an unnamed tributary of South Lilly Creek that receives surface runoff from a large egg production facility. This effort included physical-chemical measurements, assessment of fish and aquatic macroinvertebrates and chemical analyses of water and sediment. This report concluded that the egg production facility was affecting the water quality in the lower portion of the stream with respect to levels of the macro-nutrients, nitrogen and phosphorus.

Water Quality of Lake Bob Sandlin, Titus County, Texas

This report was prepared for the Titus County Fresh Water Supply District No. 1 to summarize the data collected from Lake Bob Sandlin, evaluate potential trends in water chemistry parameters, and characterize the present quality of the water in the reservoir. Water quality sampling and analysis using comparable, quality assured methods were collected at five stations in the main body of Lake Bob Sandlin and on two tributary streams. Because the direct comparison among these stations was compromised by the differing periods of record available, the data were presented by the average and range values of parameters collected from Lake Bob Sandlin open water stations at the same times. With few exceptions, parameter values at all stations tended to vary together, with greater differences evident between sampling periods than among stations within those sampling periods. Various individual parameters in the tributary streams differed from the values measured in the reservoir. Water quality in Lake Bob Sandlin closely resembles that in , which contributes the largest proportion of the water entering this reservoir.

Water Quality of Lake Cypress Springs, Franklin County, Texas

The Franklin County Water District (FCWD) has conducted water quality monitoring in accordance with the TCEQ Clean Rivers Program (CRP) since April 2000. Available historical water quality data were compiled and examined to summarize all collected lake data, evaluate potential trends in water chemistry parameters, and characterize the present water quality of Lake Cypress Springs. Information was accumulated from various deep and shallow lake water habitats monitored by TCEQ Region staff and FCWD and two tributary streams providing instream flow to the lake sampled quarterly in FY2002 as part of the CRP Systematic Monitoring Program. Statistical analyses of the 24-hr dissolved oxygen measurements, nutrients, and major dissolved constituents were used for data comparison among stations. It was concluded that major water quality problems are not presently evident in the open waters of Lake Cypress Springs. The near shore areas showed substantial evidence of enrichment, particularly when tributary inflow is present. This is possibly due to the development of rooted aquatic vegetation in shallow water areas that may restrict water circulation and recirculate nutrients through their growth and decay. Recommendations based upon the report findings were included for future consideration that may require the potential alteration of the current monitoring activities and possible additional data collection.

Geographic Information Systems

Assessments of the water quality concerns within the Cypress Creek Basin have been greatly assisted by the introduction of the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). This layer- based program allows for combining information from both geographic (map) and database (table) formats which are then utilized within the watershed inventory to locate and track information about monitoring stations, permitted discharges, agricultural operations, and other concerns within the watersheds.

The positions of possible areas of concern are determined utilizing a Global Positioning System (GPS), which produce latitude and longitude coordinates and whose information is then incorporated into the GIS program. Additional information relating to these positions such as sampling data or discharge information is linked directly to the mapped information. The relationships of the different layers that are mapped and spatially analyzed help to establish potential interrelationships and possible influence on water quality within the watershed. An example of this use could be the relative proximity of point or non-point source contributors to areas with identified water quality concerns.

Public Outreach

The Cypress Creek Basin outreach and public participation efforts have been greatly expanded during the last five years. In the summer of 1998 the Cypress Creek Basin webpage www.NETMWD.com was created on the Internet. Since that time, we have used this valuable resource to provide to the public a large range of information and data concerning our Basin. Initially, the newly created webpage focused on introducing the public to the functions of the Northeast Texas Municipal Water District and describing the Clean Rivers Program and how it operates within the Basin. Webpage emphasis has now shifted to providing stakeholders with steering committee meeting agendas and minutes, and to publishing water quality documents and current datasets that have greatly expanded our Public Outreach efforts.

A focus in the Cypress Creek Basin Public Outreach efforts is the encouragement of public involvement concerning the Clean Rivers Program and other basin activities. This involvement is an important part of the development of support for the program, and a means of obtaining broad-based recommendations from the public. The public can get involved in basin activities either through the steering committee meetings or volunteer activities. In addition, NETMWD has expanded the number of public presentations and events involving the distribution of information about the Clean Rivers Program and water quality within the Basin.

Significant Findings

Low dissolved oxygen concentrations occur in stream and marginal reservoir habitats throughout the Cypress Creek Basin. All the segments, except 0405 and 0408 (Lake Cypress Springs and Lake Bob Sandlin), have reaches on the Draft 2004 303(d) list, or for which concerns with low dissolved oxygen concentrations are expressed in the Draft 2004 Texas Water Quality Inventory. In most locations, the low dissolved oxygen concentrations are associated with low flow conditions and with high levels of photosynthesis and respiration. This does not appear to be the case in Little Cypress Creek (Segment 0409), or in marginal and backwater habitats in Caddo Lake, which exhibit only very limited changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations over 24-hour monitoring periods.

Except for ammonia, nutrient concentrations in streams rarely exceed TCEQ screening levels. However, total phosphorus and total nitrogen concentrations in streams throughout the Cypress Creek Basin are usually at levels that can result in excessive algal growth under low flow conditions, or in impoundments. The heaviest loads have been observed originating from the Tankersley Creek watershed, and to a lesser extent, from other tributary watersheds in the upper part of the basin, for example, Prairie and Lilly Creeks, and the tributaries to Lake Cypress Springs and Lake Bob Sandlin. The Southwest wastewater treatment plant in Mount Pleasant, which processes wastewater from the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation poultry processing facility is the source of a large proportion of the nitrogen and phosphorus load in Segment 0404 of Big Cypress Creek. Some phosphorus and a large proportion of the nitrogen load is lost during transport in Big Cypress Creek from the vicinity of Mount Pleasant and Pittsburg to the headwaters of Lake O’ the Pines, presumably through biological activity and trapping in the floodplain.

The upper on Big Cypress Creek are continuing to assimilate the phosphorus loads entering them. The stations immediately downstream of Lake Bob Sandlin and Lake O’ the Pines exhibit much lower total phosphorus concentrations than the inflowing waters with comparable, or lower, flows. However, Lake O’ the Pines appears to be a net exporter of nitrogen with respect to inflowing and out flowing waters. Atmospheric deposition of nitrates may be significant, as may fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by blue-green, which are common members of the algal assemblage in Lake O’ the Pines. Although the total phosphorus load entering Caddo Lake from Big Cypress Creek appears to be only about half that entering Lake O’ the Pines, and the load from James Bayou is unlikely to be as much as that, the lack of water quality data from Twelve Mile Bayou precludes any firm conclusions concerning nutrient assimilation in that water body.

Marginal and backwater habitats in Caddo Lake, as in Lake O’ the Pines, occasionally exhibit dissolved oxygen concentrations below the segment standard for support of aquatic life. However, these episodes are not generally accompanied by large daily changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations, and often reflect relatively constant, low concentrations throughout a 24- hour sample period. This is consistent with a lower nutrient load entering Caddo Lake than is the case in Lake O’ the Pines, and which consequently does not support similarly intense algal production during summer conditions. It is more likely that in Caddo Lake we are observing an intense oxygen demand from the sediments during summer conditions, primarily from decomposition of rooted plant mass-produced with nutrients from the sediments.

Despite the widespread occurrence of low dissolved oxygen concentrations, elevated nutrient levels and other water quality problems, biological communities in streams throughout the Cypress Creek Basin continue to exhibit the abundance, trophic structure (i.e., the mixture of herbivores, detritivores and predators), and diversity appropriate to, or better than, that expected based on the quality of the habitat at those locations. To the extent that low dissolved oxygen concentrations are associated with low flow conditions, it is likely that aquatic communities in the Cypress Creek Basin are, to some extent, adapted to tolerate conditions that occur at least occasionally during summer conditions even in minimally disturbed streams.

Locally, low pH values, toxicity in water and sediments, and mercury in fish tissues appear to be phenomena associated with the lower portion of the Cypress Creek Basin. The lower basin coincides with a predominantly acid soils and forested watersheds that result in “soft” , acid waters of relatively low buffering capacity. Those conditions, coupled with the intense biological activity associated with a warm, shallow, eotrophic environment are thought to be conducive to the mobilization of heavy metals (e.g., mercury) into aquatic food chains

Recommendations 1) Focus 24-hour dissolved oxygen monitoring on locations with inadequate samples for analysis. 2) Utilize 24-hour dissolved oxygen monitoring to investigate the dynamics of daily dissolved oxygen changes to help define the causes of problems. 3) Investigate the apparent increase in ammonia concentrations in Frazier Creek, a minimally disturbed stream that is an ecoregion reference. 4) Given the characteristics of the lower watershed, assess the relative importance of rainfall pH versus groundwater inflows following percolation through forest soils. 5) Continue studies to determine the sources of indicator bacteria in the Cypress Creek Basin. 6) Review laboratory quantitation limits currently obtained. Where large proportions (e.g., >33%) of analyses are resulting in censored values, either use more sensitive techniques or drop the analyses and use the conserved resources elsewhere.

Cypress Creek Basin Segments and Descriptions Segment Segment Description 0401 Caddo Lake—from the State line in Harrison/Marion County to a point 12.3 kilometers (7.6 miles) downstream of SH 43 in Harrison/Marion County, up to the normal pool elevation of 168.5 feet (impounds Big Cypress Creek). 0402 Big Cypress Creek Below Lake O’ the Pines—from a point 12.3 kilometers (7.6 miles) downstream of SH 43 in Harrison/Marion County to Ferrell’s Bridge Dam in Marion County. 0403 Lake O’ the Pines—from Ferrell’s Bridge Dam in Marion County to a point 1.0 kilometer (0.6 mile) downstream of US 259 in Morris/Upshur County, up to the normal pool elevation of 228.5 feet (impounds Big Cypress Creek). 0404 Big Cypress Creek Below Lake Bob Sandlin—from a point 1.0 kilometer (0.6 mile) downstream of US 259 in Morris/Upshur County to Fort Sherman Dam in Camp/Titus County. 0405 Lake Cypress Springs—from Franklin County Dam in Franklin County up to the normal pool elevation of 378 feet (impounds Big Cypress Creek). 0406 —from the Louisiana State Line in Cass County to FM 96 in Cass County. 0407 James’ Bayou—from the Louisiana State Line in Marion County to Club Lake Road northwest of Linden in Cass County. 0408 Lake Bob Sandlin—from Fort Sherman Dam in Camp/Titus County to Franklin County Dam in Franklin County, up to the normal pool elevation of 337.5 feet (impounds Big Cypress Creek). 0409 Little Cypress Bayou (Creek)—from the confluence with Big Cypress Creek in Harrison County to a point 1.0 kilometer (0.6 mile) upstream of FM 2088 in Wood County.

Cypress Creek Basin Watersheds with Segments And Subwatersheds They Contain Watershed Segment Subwatershed 0403 0403 Lake O’ the Pines 0404 0404 0405 0405 0408 0408 0401 0401 Caddo Lake 0402 0402 Little Cypress Creek 0409 0409 Black Cypress Bayou 0402 0406 0406 James/Black Bayou 0407 0407

Summary of Water Quality Impairments in the Cypress Basin Identified on the DRAFT 2004 Texas 303(d) List (January 15, 2004)

Segment Category Parameter(s) of Additional Information Concern

0401 5c Mercury in fish tissue In Segment 0401-Caddo Lake: the areas of Clinton Caddo Lake Lake, Goose Prairie Arm, Harrison Bayou arm, Hells Half Acre, Lower 5000 acres, Mid-lake near Uncertain, Pine Island, and the remainder of segment 0401 has high mercury levels in and freshwater drum.

5c Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels in the areas of Caddo oxygen Lake known as Clinton lake, Goose Prairie arm, Harrison Bayou arm and Hells Half Acre are sometimes lower than the level determined to guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

5c Low pH PH levels in the Goose Prairie arm area are occasionally lower than the level determined to safeguard general water quality uses.

0401A 5c Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the lower and middle Harrison oxygen segments are sometimes lower than the level Bayou determined to guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

0402 5c Mercury in fish tissue In segment 0402: 11 miles below Black Cypress Creek, Big Cypress the lower 9 miles, the middle 15 miles near Jefferson, Creek Below and the upper 7 miles of Big Cypress Creek below Lake O’ the Lake O’ the Pines has elevated mercury in fish tissue. Pines 5c Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the 11 miles below oxygen Black Cypress Creek and the lower 9 miles of this segment are sometimes lower than the level determined to guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

5c Low pH PH levels in the 11 miles below Black Cypress Creek of this segment are occasionally lower than the level determined to safeguard general water quality uses.

5c Lead (chronic) in water The level of lead (chronic) in water for the upper 7 miles exceeds the accepted criteria.

Category 5a—TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) project underway Category 5b—A review of the water quality standards for this water body will be conducted before a TMDL is scheduled. Category 5c—Additional data and information will be collected before a TMDL is scheduled.

Segment Category Parameter(s) of Additional Information Concern

0402A 5b Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the lower 15 miles, the Black oxygen middle 17 miles and the upper 10 miles of this segment Cypress are sometimes lower than the level determined to Bayou guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

5c Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the middle 1-mile, oxygen Pruitt Lake are sometimes lower than the level determined to guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

5c Mercury in fish tissue In segment 0402A, Black Cypress Bayou: the middle 1-mile, Pruitt Lake, has levels of mercury in fish tissue, which exceed the criteria.

0402D In this entire water body, mercury in fish tissue Lake 5c Mercury in fish tissue exceeds the criteria. Daingerfield

0403 5c Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the upper 3700 acres Lake O’ the oxygen are sometimes lower than the level determined to Pines guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

0404 Big Cypress 5c Bacteria Bacteria levels in the upper 18 miles of the segment are Creek Below sometimes higher than the level determined to assure Lake Bob the safety of contact recreation. Sandlin 0404A Ellison Creek 5c Chronic toxicity in Sediment from a station near the dam exhibits chronic Reservoir sediment. toxicity 0404B Tankersley 5c Bacteria Bacteria levels in the 3 miles below Tankersley Lake, Creek and the middle 2 miles near FM 127 in this segment are sometimes higher than the level determined to assure the safety of contact recreation.

0406 5b Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the lower 12 miles and Black Bayou oxygen upper 12 miles of this segment are sometimes lower than the level determined to guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

Category 5a—TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) project underway Category 5b—A review of the water quality standards for this water body will be conducted before a TMDL is scheduled. Category 5c—Additional data and information will be collected before a TMDL is scheduled.

Segment Category Parameter(s) of Additional Information Concern

0407 5c Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the lower 15 miles and James’ Bayou oxygen upper 25 miles of this segment are sometimes lower than the level determined to guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

5c Copper (acute) in water The upper 25 miles of this segment have elevated copper (acute) in water.

0409 Little Cypress 5c Depressed dissolved The dissolved oxygen levels of the lower 25 miles, Bayou oxygen middle 18 miles above Hwy 154 and middle 25 miles below Hwy 27l are sometimes lower than the level determined to guarantee the best conditions for aquatic life.

Category 5a—TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) project underway Category 5b—A review of the water quality standards for this water body will be conducted before a TMDL is scheduled. Category 5c—Additional data and information will be collected before a TMDL is scheduled.

James/Black Bayou Watershed Stations Sampled in 1998-2002

Classified/ Unclassified Segment Station Description

CL 406 16157 Black Bayou at FM 2791

CL 406 10314 Black Bayou at Cass CR 4659

CL 407 10321 James Bayou at Cass CR 1775

CL 407 10320 James Bayou at FM 248

CL 407 10319 James Bayou Bridge on Marion CR 3312

UCL 407 10259 Frazier Creek at US 59

UCL 407 17619 Frazier Creek at FM 248

James/Black Bayou Watershed Wastewater Dischargers by Size 1

Avg. Daily Permitted Facility Name Facility Type Type of Discharge Segment Effluent (MGD) City of Atlanta Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 406 2 City of Waskom Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 400 0.5 City of Linden Beach Creek Plant Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 407 0.45

City of Linden Plant 2 Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 407 0.25 City of Bloomburg Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 400 0.09 TXDOT Cass Co. Rest Area Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 407 0.0075 Anthony Forest Products Outfall 1-3 Lumber Industiral Permit-Treated 406 Variable2 Domestic Wastewater Ward Timber Company Lumber wet decking wastewater, 407 Variable2 stormwater International Paper Co. - Scottsville Lumber Co-mingled stormwater and 400 Variable2 Wood yard log wet deck water 1Last updated April 2004 2Intermittent and flow variable basis

Black Cypress Bayou Watershed (Unclassified Tributary of Segment 0402) Stations Sampled in the 1998-2002 Period

Station Description 16934 Kelley Creek at FM 250 10248 Black Cypress Bayou at FM 250 10247 Black Cypress Bayou at SH 11 16935 Flat Creek at SH 11 10246 Black Cypress Bayou at SH 155 16258 Hughes Creek West of Intersection of SH 11 and SH 49 16936 Hughes Creek at SH 155 16705 Black Cypress Bayou at Cass CR 1617 10245 Black Cypress Bayou at US 59

Black Cypress Bayou Watershed Wastewater Dischargers by Size 1

Avg. Daily Permitted Current Permit Facility Name Facility Type Type of Discharge Segment Effluent Status (MGD) City of Hughes Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 402 0.75 Active Springs

City of Jefferson Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 402 0.55 Renewal

City of Naples Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 402 0.25 Application City of Avinger Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 402 0.12 Active

Segment 405 and 408 Stations Sampled in 1998-2002

Classified/ Unclassified Segment Station Description CL 405 16939 Lake Cypress Springs at West End

CL 405 16937 Lake Cypress Springs at North Shore

CL 405 16938 Lake Cypress Springs in Panther Creek Arm

CL 405 17518 Lake Cypress Springs in Frog Creek Arm

CL 405 16940 Lake Cypress Springs at Tall Tree

CL 405 17548 Lake Cypress Springs in Panther Creek Cove

CL 405 10313 Lake Cypress Springs at FM 115

CL 405 10312 Lake Cypress Springs Mid-Lake near Dam

UCL 405 15260 Big Cypress Creek at SH 37

UCL 405 17322 Panther Creek at Franklin CR 4260SE

CL 408 16158 Lake Bob Sandlin at FM 21

CL 408 10330 Lake Bob Sandlin Adj. To Lake Monticello Dam

CL 408 17060 Lake Bob Sandlin at Pittsburg Intake

CL 408 17059 Lake Bob Sandlin at Mt. Pleasant Water Intake

CL 408 10329 Lake Bob Sandlin at Dam

UCL 408 15261 Brushy Creek at FM 115

UCL 408 17323 Andy’s Creek at Titus CR 2910

UCL 408 15262 Blundell Creek at Franklin CR 4130

Segment 404 Stations Sampled in 1998-2002

Classified/ Unclassified Segment Station Description

CL 404 10311 Big Cypress Creek at Fort Sherman Dam

CL 404 16460 Big Cypress Creek at Gasline Crossing

CL 404 16457 Big Cypress Creek below Walker Creek Confluence

CL 404 10308 Big Cypress Creek Bridge on SH 11

CL 404 10307 Big Cypress Creek at Fish Camp Big Cypress Creek Downstream of Confluence with CL 404 16458 Greasy Creek

CL 404 15257 Big Cypress Creek at FM 997

CL 404 10305 Big Cypress Creek adjacent to Lone Star Steel Outfall

CL 404 13631 Big Cypress Creek at US 259

UCL 404 10264 Tankersley Creek at FM 899

UCL 404 10263 Tankersley Creek at FM 127

UCL 404 10261 Tankersley Creek at FM 3417

UCL 404 17034 Unnamed Tributary of Hart Creek at 1st Street

UCL 404 10272 Hart Creek at SH 49

UCL 404 10266 Hart Creek Upstream of Big Cypress Creek Confluence

UCL 404 16454 Walkers Creek at US 271 Walkers Creek Upstream of the Confluence with Big UCL 404 16714 Cypress Creek

UCL 404 10274 Dry Creek at Camp County Road

UCL 404 10275 Dry Creek at FM 557

UCL 404 15738 Swauano Creek at SH 49

UCL 404 15836 Prairie Creek at FM 557

UCL 404 16016 Greasy Creek at FM 557

UCL 404 15894 Boggy Creek at FM 144

UCL 404 14473 Ellison Creek Reservoir at Dam

Segment 0403 Stations Sampled in 1998-2002

Classified/ Unclassified Segment Station Description CL 403 10300 Lake O’ the Pines Adjacent to Lone Star Landing CL 403 16868 Lake O’ the Pines South of US 259 CL 403 17087 Lake O’ the Pines North of SH 155 CL 403 10298 Lake O’ the Pines at SH 155 CL 403 10297 Lake O’ the Pines near NETMWD Intake CL 403 13977 Lake O’ the Pines Site EC CL 403 16156 Lake O’ the Pines Mid-Lake on Alley Creek CL 403 16450 Lake O’ the Pines in Alley Creek Cove CL 403 16449 Lake O’ the Pines in Arms Creek Arm CL 403 16448 Lake O’ the Pines in Brushy Creek Arm CL 403 16452 Lake O’ the Pines in Hurricane Creek Cove CL 403 10296 Lake O’ the Pines Mid-Lake near Dam UCL 403 15504 Meddlin Creek at US 259 UCL 403 16456 Arms Creek at FM 726 UCL 403 16455 Alley Creek at SH 155

Lake O’ the Pines Watershed Wastewater Dischargers by Size 1

Avg. Daily Permitted Facility Name Facility Type Type of Discharge Segment Effluent (MGD) TXU - Monticello SES Power Plant Once-through cooling water, 0408 1785 previously monitored effluents SWEPCO - Welsh Power Plant Once-through cooling water, 0404 1425 treated domestic discharge SWEPCO - Wilkes Power Plant Condenser cooling water and 0403 550 previously monitored effluents SWEPCO - Lone Star Power Plant Condenser Cooling Water 0404 80 Lone Star Steel Industrial Treated process wastewater, 0404 70 cooling water, boiler blowdown, stormwater Pilgrims Pride - Industrial Treated process wastewater, 0404 3 Southwest Plant treated domestic wastewater

City of Mount Pleasant Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0404 2.91 SWTF City of Winfield Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0408 0.84

City of Lone Star Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0403 0.44 City of Ore City Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0403 0.218 City of Daingerfield Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0404 0.7

City of Omaha Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0404 0.2 City of Pittsburg Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0404 1.17 Miller's Cove Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0408 0.038 Chapel Hill ISD Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0404 0.032 Aqua Source Utility Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0403 0.02 Crestwood Plant NE TX C. College Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0404 0.01 Star Tubular Services Industrial Treated Domestic Wastewater 0404 0.0065 Inc.T&N Lone Star and washwater Warehouse Derdeyn/Ford, Inc. Domestic Treated Domestic Wastewater 0403 0.002

Ergon Asphalt and Industrial Stormwater 0404 Variable2 Emulsions, Inc.

1Last updated April 2004 2Intermittent and flow variable basis

Little Cypress Watershed Stations Sampled 1998-2002

Classified/ Unclassified Segment Station Description CL 409 14975 Little Cypress Creek at FM 852 CL 409 16017 Little Cypress Bayou at US 271 CL 409 10334 Little Cypress Bayou at FM 555 CL 409 10333 Little Cypress Bayou at SH 154 CL 409 16861 Little Cypress Bayou at US 259 CL 409 15773 Little Cypress Creek at FM 450 CL 409 10332 Little Cypress Creek at US 59 UCL 409 16453 Kelsey Creek at CR 852 UCL 409 17478 Lake Gilmer at Dam UCL 409 15834 Lilly Creek at US 271 UCL 409 14996 Caney Creek at Upshur CR 2263 UCL 409 16533 Gum Creek at FM 1649 UCL 409 16532 Moccasin Creek at FM 449 UCL 409 10250 Grays Creek Tributary at FM 1997

Little Cypress Creek Watershed Wastewater Dischargers by Size 1 Avg. Daily Permitted Effluent Facility Name Facility Type Type of Discharge Segment (MGD) City of Gilmer Domestic Treated Domestic 409 1.75 Wastewater Gateway Power Project Power Plant cooling water blowdown, 409 1.33 low volume wastes Robroy Industries Industrial non-contact cooling water, 409 0.225 boiler blowdown, and stormwater Diana Water Supply Corp. Domestic Treated Domestic 409 0.12 Wastewater Gilmer Potteries Industrial process wastewater 409 0.05 Harmony ISD Domestic Treated Domestic 409 0.03 Wastewater Oak Haven Recovery Center Domestic Treated Domestic 409 0.01 (Sabine Valley Regional MHMR Wastewater Center) Union Hill ISD Domestic Treated Domestic 409 0.008 Wastewater Snider Ind., Marshall Lumber Mill, Lumber Once through cooling and 409 Variable 2 stormwater 1Last updated April 2004 2Intermittent and flow variable basis

Caddo Lake Watershed Stations Sampled in 1998-2002

Classified/ Unclassified Segment Station Description CL 402 13630 Big Cypress Creek near Ferrell’s Bridge Dam CL 402 15135 Big Cypress Creek below Lake O’ the Pines CL 402 15511 at US 59 CL 402 16254 Big Cypress Creek at the Marshall Intake CL 401 15021 Caddo Lake at the State Park Pier CL 402 15022 Big Cypress Creek at State Park Boat Ramp CL 401 15248 Caddo Lake near Winns Pier CL 401 10294 Caddo Lake in Carter Lake CL 401 14236 Caddo Lake near Clinton Lake CL 401 15249 Caddo Lake at the end of FM 2198 CL 401 15275 Caddo Lake in Goose Prairie Arm CL 401 10283 Caddo Lake Mid-Lake CL 401 10286 Caddo Lake at Harrison Bayou CL 401 10285 Caddo Lake SW of Long Point UCL 402 16253 Haggerty Creek at SH 134 UCL 401 14998 Kitchen Creek at Marion CR 3616 UCL 401 15507 Harrison Bayou at FM 1998 UCL 401 15506 Harrison Bayou at Harrison CR 2211 UCL 401 15508 Harrison Bayou at FM 134 UCL 401 15509 Harrison Bayou at Harrison CR 2607

Caddo Lake Watershed Wastewater Dischargers 1

Avg. Daily Permitted Effluent Facility Name Facility Type Type of Discharge Segment (MGD) Treated Domestic Woodridge Apartments Domestic 401 0.004 Wastewater 1Last updated April 2004