DOCSLIB.ORG

Oil Palm Cna Report Final 4 30 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oil Palm Cna Report Final 4 30 2016 OIL PALM COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMUNITIES AND SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN THE CONCESSION AREAS OF SIME DARBY AND GOLDEN VEROLEUM Final Report April 2016 conducted by: SUBAH-BELLEH ASSOCIATES ( M ANAGEMENT C ONSULTANTS ) Monrovia, Liberia [email protected] www.subah-belleh.com on behalf of the Liberia National Bureau of Concessions and the [Year] Oil Palm Out-grower Scheme Implementation Technical Committee, with funding from the GROW Liberia Programme. Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Acronyms.................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2 Introduction & Background ...................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 National Context ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Agriculture Sector ........................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 The GROW Liberia Programme ....................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Community Needs Assessment ....................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Population and sampling ................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.1. Sample size determination .............................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Data Processing and Analysis .......................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Constraints ...................................................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 4 Findings ................................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents ...................................................................... 21 4.1.1 Demographic ........................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.2 Economic Activities ................................................................................................................. 21 4.1.3 Health Situation ....................................................................................................................... 22 4.1.4 Wealth Status in the Community ............................................................................................ 24 4.2 Community Challenges.................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1 Land Access/Ownership: ......................................................................................................... 26 4.2.2 Extension Services: .................................................................................................................. 27 4.2.3 Access to Farming inputs......................................................................................................... 28 4.2.4 Source of Inputs ...................................................................................................................... 28 4.2.5 Road Networks ........................................................................................................................ 29 4.2.6 Human Capacity Development: .............................................................................................. 29 4.2.7 Access to Credits: .................................................................................................................... 30 4.3 Community Risk Factors .................................................................................................................. 31 4.3.1 Sources of Livelihood and Level of Income ............................................................................. 31 4.3.2 Social Contributions by Concessions to the Communities ...................................................... 32 4.3.3 Perceived Impact of the Concession on the Environment and Community ........................... 33 4.3.4 Impact of Concessions on Community Social Life ................................................................... 35 4.3.5 Risk of Conflict/Violence between Community and Concessions ........................................... 37 4.4 Production Challenges .................................................................................................................... 38 4.4.1 Access to Resources for Oil Palm Farming .............................................................................. 38 4.4.2 Organizational Issues............................................................................................................... 39 4.5 Community Concerns ...................................................................................................................... 39 4.5.1 Type of Support Communities Feel Is Needed from Concessions .......................................... 39 4.5.2 Benefits Communities Wish to Receive from Concessions ..................................................... 40 4.6 Out-grower Production Arrangements/Structures ......................................................................... 40 4.6.1 Process in Selecting Elements of Out-grower Arrangements ................................................. 40 4.6.2 Summary of Out-grower Models used as Examples: .............................................................. 40 4.6.3 Who should benefit from an Out-grower Scheme .................................................................. 41 4.6.4 Prior Knowledge of Out-grower Schemes ............................................................................... 42 4.6.5 Selected Schemes .................................................................................................................... 43 4.6.6 Additional Proposed Out-grower Production Arrangements ................................................. 45 Chapter 5 Summary Findings .................................................................................................................................................... 46 6.1 Government, CSOs and Concessions .............................................................................................. 46 6.2 Government ............................................................................................................................ 46 6.3 CSOs ......................................................................................................................................... 46 6.4 Concessions ............................................................................................................................. 47 Chapter 6 Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 48 6.1 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 48 6.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 50 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix 1 RSPO and FPIC ............................................................................................................................................... 54 Appendix 2 Coverage Statistics ......................................................................................................................................... 61 Appendix 3 Detailed Comparison of Community Oil Palm Out-grower Models ................................................ 62 List of Tables Table 1: Allocation of Sample Size by Region and PAC ................................................................................... 16 Table 2: Actual Data Collection Coverage by Concession and Units .............................................................. 18 Table 3: Percent Distribution by Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Household Heads ........................... 22 Table 4: Percent Distribution of Respondents by Type of Illness Experienced by Household Members in the Last Month Prior to the Survey and Access to Care amongst Household Members ...................................... 23 Table 5: Percent Distribution of Household by Source of Drinking Water and Type of Toilet Facility ........... 24 Table 6: Percent Distribution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberia BULLETIN Bimonthly Published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia
    LibeRIA BULLETIN Bimonthly published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia 1 October 2004 Vol. 1, Issue No. 4 Voluntary Repatriation Started October 1, 2004 The inaugural convoys of 77 Liberian refugees from Sierra Leone and 97 from Ghana arrived to Liberia on October 1, 2004, which marked the commencement of the UNHCR voluntary repatriation. Only two weeks prior to the beginning of the repatriation, the County Resettlement Assessment Committee (CRAC) pro- claimed four counties safe for return – Grand Cape Mount, Bomi, Gbarpolu and Margibi. The first group of refugees from Sierra Leone is returning to their homes in Grand Cape Mount. UNHCR is only facilitating re- turns to safe areas. Upon arrival, returnees have the option to spend a couple of nights in transit centers (TC) before returning to their areas of origin. At the TC, they received water, cooked meals, health care, as well as a two-months resettlement ration and a Non- Signing of Tripartite Agreement with Guinea Food Items (NFI) package. With the signing of the Tripartite Agreements, which took place in Accra, Ghana, on September 22, 2004 with the Ghanian government and in Monrovia, Liberia, on September 27, 2004 with the governments of Si- erra Leone, Guinea and Cote d’Ivorie, binding agree- ment has been established between UNHCR, asylum countries and Liberia. WFP and UNHCR held a regional meeting on Septem- ber 27, 2004 in Monrovia and discussed repatriation plans for Liberian refugees and IDPs. WFP explained that despite the current food pipeline constraints, the repatriation of refugees remains a priority for the Country Office.
    [Show full text]
  • There Are Two Systems of Surveillance Operating in Burundi at Present
    LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2017 1 LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) April 2017 This publication was prepared by Stephen Browne and Amadou Diop for the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), in collaboration with the Liberian Ministry of Agriculture, USAID Liberia, WFP, and FAO. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Page 2 of 60 Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 Background and Introduction......................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 8 National Livelihood Zone Map .......................................................................................................12 National Seasonal Calendar ..........................................................................................................13 Timeline of Shocks and Hazards ....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Liberia 2017 Annual Integrated Disease
    REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA 2017 ANNUAL INTEGRATED DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE (IDSR) Preventing and Controlling BULLETIN Public Health Threats JANUARY – DECEMBER 2017 39 3 Disease Humanitarian Outbreaks Events Division of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology National Public Health Institute of Liberia Table of Contents EDITORIAL……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 I. OVERVIEW OF IDSR IN LIBERIA………………………………………………………………………………………………... 3 II. IDSR PERFORMANCE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 A. Reporting Coverage…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….3 B. Selected IDSR Performance Indicators…………………………………………………………………………………………6 C. National IDSR Supervision………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 D. IDSR Immediately Reportable Diseases/Events………………………………………………………………………………9 E. IDSR Monthly Reportable Diseases/Conditions………………………………………………………………………………10 III. OUTBREAKS AND HUMANITARIAN EVENTS………………………………………………………………………………… 11 A. Introduction……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………11 B. Measles……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 C. Lassa fever…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14 D. Human Monkeypox……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………..17 E. Meningococcal Disease…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...21 F. Floods/Mudslides…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...22 G. Chemical Spills………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………23 IV. DISEASES/CONDITIONS OF PUBLIC HEALTH IMPORTANCE…………………………………………………………….. 24 V. PUBLIC HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS………………………………………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Cape Mount CDA
    Grand Cape Mount County Development Agenda Republic of Liberia 2008 – 2012 Grand Cape Mount County Development Agenda VISION STATEMENT: By 2027, we the People of Cape Mount County envisage a County with improved infrastructure and access to basic services including good health care, quality education, good road network, and electricity; an industrialized agricultural economy; and a peaceful and secure environment for all, where women are respected and fully empowered to contribute to growth and development. The People envision working together with commitment and dedication to develop their full economic, social and cultural potential, for a fuller and richer life for all, regardless of tribe, sex, religion or politics. Republic of Liberia Prepared by the County Development Committee, in collaboration with the Ministries of Planning and Economic Affairs and Internal Affairs. Supported by the UN County Support Team project, funded by the Swedish Government and UNDP. Table of Contents A MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS.........! iii FOREWORD..........................................................................! iv PREFACE..............................................................................! vi GRAND CAPE MOUNT COUNTY OFFICIALS............................! vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................! ix PART 1 - INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................! 1 1.2 History........................................................................................................!
    [Show full text]
  • Sime Darby and Land Grabs in Liberia French Banks Financing Land Grabbing
    Sime Darby and land grabs in Liberia French banks financing land grabbing FACTSHEET | APRIL 2013 for the people | for the planet | for the future The case What is Sime Darby doing in Liberia? Malaysia-based Sime Darby, one of the world’s largest • On July 23, 2009 Sime Darby signed a 63-year lease producers of palm oil, is developing palm oil plantations in agreement with the government of Liberia, for 311,187 Liberia, swallowing up farmlands and forests used by local hectares (about 760000 acres) of land which is referred to as communities to sustain their livelihoods. the Gross Concession Area. The contracts for land concessions signed by Sime Darby and • The government agreed to allocate land ‘free of the Liberian Government violate several Human Rights encumbrances’ to Sime Darby, with the understanding that principles in conventions ratified by the Liberian Government the company would cultivate 220,000 hectares within as well as principles enshrined in Liberian Law. Affected twenty years of signing the agreement. communities and civil society have organised to demand from • The company agreed that it would pay US$5 per hectare per the company and Liberian Government that communities’ year for land it cultivates for oil palm and provide rights are recognized and the contract between Sime Darby employment for more than 30,000 Liberians. and the Government are renegotiated to ensure that it is compliant with these human rights principles and laws. • In 2010, Sime Darby started operations in western Liberia, Sime Darby Plantation is the agri-business division of the Sime cultivating land to set up an oil palm nursery.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning in Liberia: Literacy and Numeracy Gains in Year 1 a Study on Bridge Partnership Schools for Liberia (PSL)
    Learning in Liberia: Literacy and Numeracy Gains in Year 1 A Study on Bridge Partnership Schools for Liberia (PSL) Executive Summary Learning in Liberia: Literacy and Numeracy Gains in Year 1 A Study on Bridge Partnership Schools for Liberia (PSL) Executive Summary September 9, 2017 Gbovadeh Gbilia, Deputy Minister for Planning, Research and Development, Ministry of Education, Government of Liberia Dr. Saaim W. Naame, Dean of the School of Education and Professor of Education and Research Methods, Cuttington University Graduate School & University of Liberia Sarah Lauren Jaffe, Monitoring & Evaluation Director and Interim Chief Program Officer, Worldreader Leslie Engle Young, Chief Impact Officer, Pencils of Promise Emmanuel Novy, Head of Learning and Evaluation, Pencils of Promise Joe Gbasakollie, Deputy Country Director, Bridge Partnership Schools for Liberia Lisa Chen, Global Measurement & Evaluation Director, Bridge International Academies Jennifer Sargeant, Global Measurement & Evaluation Manager, Bridge International Academies *Acknowledgements: We would first like to thank President Sirleaf and the Liberian Ministry of Education for their commitment to rigorous monitoring and evaluation efforts, notably Minister George Werner; Deputy Ministers Dr. Romelle Horton and Aagon Tingba; Assistant Ministers Advertus Wright, Felicia Sackey Doe-Sumah, Saa David Nyumah, Jr, Augustine Kimber, and Lalata Wei; Directors Madia Mensah Herring,Binta Massaquoi, and Josephus Meatay; Nisha Makan of AGI; Kammi Sheeler of ODI; and the Ministry of Education’s REOs, CEOs, DEOs, regional planning officers, and regional M&E officers of the counties in which we work. Specifically we would like to thank Moses S. Dologbay (CEO), Hannah Clarke Tamba (DEO), and James B. Garwwuo (M&E Officer) from Nimba County - Saclepea 2 District; Edward Kpulun (CEO), Samuel Koenig (DEO), and Stanley Nyeekpee (M&E Officer) from Bong County - Salala District; Dwight Harvey (CEO), Golafe Mambu (DEO), and Laybianumah T.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipient Organization(S) Title: #66 Support to Multi-Hazard
    UN EBOLA RESPONSE MPTF FINAL PROGRAMME1 NARRATIVE REPORT DATE: 15 JANUARY 2019 Project Number(s) and Title(s) Recipient Organization(s) Title: #66 Support to multi-hazard preparedness RUNO(s): FAO, IOM, UNDP and WHO and response for Liberia Project Focal Point: Name: Dr Alex Gasasira Gateway ID (Project ID): 00106849 E-mail: [email protected] Strategic Objective & Mission Critical Action(s) Implementing Partner(s) SO (STEPP) – SO5 PREVENT Republic of Liberia ministries and agencies; • Ministry of Health (MoH) MCA 13 – Multi-faceted preparedness • Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) • Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA) • Disaster Management Agency (DMA) Location: Sub-National Coverage Area: Liberia, African region Project activities implemented in all the 15 counties of Liberia (Montserrado, Margibi, Bong, Bomi, Nimba, Lofa, Gbarpolu, Grand Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Grand Kru, Grand Gedeh, River Cess, River Gee, Mary Land and Sinoe) Programme/Project Cost (US$) Programme Duration Total approved US $ 2,500,000 of which; Overall budget as per FAO: 212,166 US$ 30th August 2017 Duration project proposal IOM: 600,000 US$ (7 months original project Project Start document: UNDP: 650,000 US$ duration) Date3 MPTF2 WHO: 1,037,834 US$ US $: 1,512,166 of which; Agency FAO: 212,166 Originally Contribution IOM: 350,000 Projected End 30th March 2018 (Financial UNDP: 650,000 Date4 Commitments) WHO: 600,000 Actual End 30th November 2018 (15 months Government date5 actual project duration) 100,000 USD $ (For Contribution Agency(ies) renovation of national EOC) (if applicable) have Yes No operationally 1 If there has been an extension, then the revised, approved end date should be reflected here.
    [Show full text]
  • Sime Darby and Land Grabs in Liberia
    for the people | for the planet | for the future Fact sheet Sime Darby and land grabs in Liberia Friends of the Earth Europe gratefully acknowledges financial assistance from all its donors. Detailed information about Friends of the Earth Europe’s funding can be found at: www.foeeurope.org/about/english.htm The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Friends of the Earth Europe and cannot be regarded as reflecting the position of the funder(s) mentioned above. The funders cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information this document contains. Friends of the Earth Europe asbl Rue d’Edimbourg 26 | 1050 Brussels | Belgium Tel. +32 2 893 10 00 | Fax +32 2 893 10 35 | [email protected] | www.foeeurope.org for the people | for the planet | for the future Fact sheet Sime Darby and land grabs in Liberia The case Malaysia-based Sime Darby, one of the world's largest producers of palm oil is developing palm oil plantations in Liberia, swallowing up farmlands and forests used by local communities to sustain their livelihoods. The contracts for land concessions signed by Sime Darby and the Liberian Government violate several Human Rights principles in conventions ratified by the Liberian Government as well as principles enshrined in Liberian Law. Affected communities and civil society have organised to demand from the company and Liberian Government that communities’ rights are recognized and contracts between Sime Darby and the Government are renegotiated. What is Sime Darby doing in Liberia? On July 23, 2009 Sime Darby signed a 63-year lease agreement with the government of Liberia, for 311,187 hectares (about 760000 acres) of land which is referred to as the Gross Concession Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Information Document
    LIBERIA INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS AND GEO- INFORMATION SERVICES HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY (HIES 2014/2015) BASIC INFORMATION DOCUMENT December 2015 ACRONYMS AfDB African Development Bank CV Coefficient of Variation CWIQ Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire EA Enumeration Area EU European Union GoL Government of Liberia GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System HIES Household Income and Expenditure Survey LISGIS Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services NGO Non-governmental Organization PSU Primary Statistical Unit SIDA Swedish International Development Agency UNMIL United Nations Mission in Liberia USAID United States Agency for International Development WB World Bank Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SURVEY ........................................................................................... 1 SAMPLING FRAME FOR THE 2014/2015 HIES ............................................................................... 3 Stratification of the Sampling Frame for the 2014/2015 HIES ......................................................... 4 Sample Size and Allocation for 2014/2015 HIES ............................................................................. 4 Sample selection procedures .............................................................................................................. 7 PILOT TEST .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SDI's 10-Year Crusade
    SDI’S 10-year positive peace 2013 crusade 2011 2003 2010 2012 2004 2002 2009 ” . r l o k a a i u S s g n u u o s y A a ’ n a s n s a p e K n s 2008 i a l s i S u b e r o 2006 m o n “ 2007 2005 In the last decade alone, the SDI has mobilised and empowered local communities across Liberia and advocated for them to have an active role and a space in decision-making in natural resources governance. Robtel Neajai Pailey SDI’S 10-year positive peace crusade 2 | sdi: 10-year positive peace crusade contents A POSITIVE PEACE AGENDA FOR A POST-WAR POLITY 4 METHODOLOGY 5 SDI IS CONCEIVED, BIRTHED, AND REBIRTHED 6 one LIBERIA’S NATURAL RESOURCES IN 2003: GENESIS 8 SDI’s Natural Resources Governance Advocacy two LIBERIA’S NATURAL RESOURCES SINCE 2003: SUCCESSES 12 SDI’s One-Decade of Achievements three LIBERIA’S NATURAL RESOURCES SINCE 2003: CHALLENGES 18 Major Impediments to SDI’s Work in Natural Resources Governance four LIBERIA’S NATURAL RESOURCES POST 2013: LOOKING FORWARD 22 Opportunities for SDI’s Improved Advocacy in Natural Resources Governance A LUTA CONTINUA 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY 27 Author: Robtel Neajai Pailey. Acknowledgments: This publication has been researched, designed and printed with generous financial support from the ICCO Cooperation (Netherlands), American Jewish World Service (USA) and Trocaire (Ireland). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of our donors.
    [Show full text]
  • 1848 Ministries and Agencies in Liberia Name
    Ministries and Agencies in Liberia Ministry of Foreign Affairs Creation: 1848 Name: Its current, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, came into being in 1972 Former Name: Department of State (DoS). The DoS was headed, initially, by a Secretary of State. Hilary Teague, who also drafted the Liberian Declaration of Independence, became Liberia’s first secretary of State in 1848. Current Function: It implements Liberia’s external policies and relations and manages its Diplomatic missions accredited abroad. Former Function: Same as the new function Order of Succession: 3. The Minister of Foreign Affairs is the dean of the cabinet and therefore ascends to the presidency after the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Pro Tempore of the Liberian Senate. Employees: Outlays: Ministry of Finance & Development Planning Creation: 2014 Name: Ministry of Finance & Development Planning Former Name: Ministry of Finance Function: MFDP formulates and administers economic development, fiscal and tax policies for the promotion of sound and efficient management of the financial resources of the Government, administers the revenue program of the Government, including supervision of the collection of the revenues; reports the financial activities and financial position of the Government to the President and the Legislature; maintains the central accounting records of the Government and prescribe for all Government agencies of accounts reporting and documentation necessary to safeguard the assets of the Government. MFDP also formulates fiscal policies for
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Call for Proposals Terms of Reference
    Call for Proposals Terms of Reference - Liberia Landscape Program Facilitating the people of Garwula District in Grand Cape Mount County and, The people of Senjeh and Klay Districts in Bomi County To develop Participatory Land Use Plans September 25, 2020 1. Introduction IDH Sustainable Trade Initiative (“IDH”) accelerates and up-scales sustainable trade by building impact oriented coalitions of front running companies, civil society, governments, knowledge institutions and other stakeholders in several commodity sectors. We convene the interests, strengths and knowledge of public and private partners in sustainability commodity programs that aim to mainstream international and domestic commodity markets. We jointly formulate strategic intervention plans with public and private partners and we co-invest with partners in activities that generate public goods. On basis of these Terms of Reference IDH aims to select a party to facilitate the people of Senjeh and Klay Districts in Bomi County, and the people of Garwula District in Grand Cape Mount County to develop Participatory Land Use Plans. This Terms of Reference is for a consultancy firm or team to support communities in the three districts to develop PLUPs. Garwula District covers an estimated 81,291 hectares of land and a population of 26,936 distributed across 8 Clans. Most of the district is forested and the main livelihood activity is subsistence farming. Senjeh District covers an estimated 53,482 hectares of land and a population of 30,027 distributed across 4 Clans. Klay District covers an estimated 60,846 hectares of land and a population of 23,397 distributed across 4 Clans. The rural parts of the districts are forested and the main livelihood activity is subsistence farming.
    [Show full text]