DOCSLIB.ORG

USGS Open-File Report 2014–Xxxx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USGS Open-File Report 2014–Xxxx Proceedings of the 9th U.S.-Japan Natural Resources Panel for Earthquake Research Edited By Shane T. Detweiler and William Ellsworth Open-File Report 2014–1250 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747) For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. The abstracts by non-U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) authors in this volume are published as they were submitted. Abstracts authored entirely by non-USGS authors do not represent the views or position of the USGS or the U.S. Government and are published solely as part of this volume. Suggested citation: Detweiler, S., and Ellsworth, W., eds., 2015, Proceedings of the 9th U.S.-Japan natural resources panel for earthquake research: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1250, 89 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141250. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction____________________________________________________________1 Agenda________________________________________________________________2 Session I Abstracts______________________________________________________7 Yuki Hatanaka “Interplate coupling on and around the focal area of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Japan”_________________________________________8 Fred Chester “Location and structure of the subduction thrust in the region of maximum slip during the 2011 MW 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake”_____________________________10 Toshiya Fujiwara “Coseismic fault rupture reaching the trench axis during the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake”___________________________________________________________12 Mark Simons “The 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and the Advanced Rapid Imaging and Analysis (ARIA) Project for Natural Hazard Monitoring and Response”____________________14 Makoto Matsubara “The 2011 Tohoku-oki Earthquake related to a strong velocity gradient within the Pacific plate”__________________________________________________16 Shuo Ma “Uncovering the Mysteries of Tsunami Generation and Anomalous Seismic Radiation in the Shallow Subduction Zone”_____________________________________________19 Yasuto Kuwahara “Stress states before and after the 2011 Great Tohoku earthquake in and around the focal region”__________________________________________________21 Eileen L. Evans and Brendan J. Meade “Geodetic imaging of coseismic slip and postseismic afterslip: Sparsitypromoting methods applied to the great Tohoku Earthquake”_____23 Takashi Saito “GSI activities in response to the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake”___________________________________________________________24 Session II Abstracts____________________________________________________26 Art Frankel “USGS Seismic Hazard Mapping Efforts: U.S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Urban Seismic Hazard Maps Based on 3D Simulations”_________________________27 Koshun Yamaoka “National Policy and Project on the Earthquake Research after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake”_____________________________________30 i Margaret Glasscoe “E-DECIDER: Experiences Developing Earthquake Disaster Decision Support and Response Tools”_____________________________________________________32 Hiroyuki Fujiwara “Some considerations for improvement of the National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan”_____________________________________________________________34 Morgan Moschetti “Time-independent earthquake forecasts for the Intermountain West, United States” ____________________________________________________36 Session III Abstracts____________________________________________________38 Bruce Jaffe “Assessing Tsunami Hazard from Paleotsunami Deposits”____________________39 Masanobu Shishikura “Strategy for evaluating giant earthquake and tsunami by coastal paleoseismology”_______________________________________________________40 Takeshi Koizumi “JMA's response to the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and planned Improvements of Tsunami Warning”_________________________________42 Session IV Abstracts____________________________________________________44 Dominic Asimaki “Nonlinear site and topography effects in ground motion predictions: Observations, Hypotheses and Lessons to be learned”__________________________45 Shin Aoi “Strong motion characteristics of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake observed by K-NET and KiK-net”___________________________________________________________47 Lisa Grant-Ludwig “Reconciling precariously balanced rocks with large earthquakes on the San Andreas fault system”____________________________________________________49 Session V Abstracts_____________________________________________________50 Jeremy Zechar “Betting against the house and peer-to-peer gambling: a Monte Carlo view of earthquake forecasting”__________________________________________________51 Kohei Nagata “Information services on earthquake prediction and forecast of JMA”________52 Yasuyuki Yamada “Earthquake Early Warning of JMA- The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its aftershocks”____________________________________________54 John Vidale “Early Warning on the US West Coast”___________________________________56 ii Session VI Abstracts____________________________________________________57 David Chadwell “Potential contributions of Seafloor Geodesy to understanding slip behavior along the Cascadia Subduction Zone”_______________________________________58 Sarah Minson “Performance Tests of Real-Time Permanent Displacement Estimates and Rapid Rupture Characterization From Real-Time High-Rate GPS”_______________________60 Andrea Donnellan “Integrating GPS and Radar Geodetic Imaging Observations with Models for Earthquake Response and Planning Additional data Collection”___________________61 Ken Xiaosheng Hao “Rapid assessment of high seismic intensity areas for mega-earthquake using satellite SAR data”__________________________________________________62 Gavin Hayes “Real-Time Monitoring at the USGS National Earthquake Information Center: Past, Present, Future”________________________________________________________64 Charles Estabrook “NSF's EarthScope Program – Introduction and Updates”_______________66 Poster Session (Session VII) Abstracts_____________________________________67 Shin Aoi “Ocean bottom seismic and tsunami network along the Japan Trench”____________68 Satoshi Kawamoto (presented by Dr. Yuki Hatanaka) “Developing a GEONET Real-time Processing System for Rapid Earthquake Modeling”____________________________70 Yasuto Kuwahara “Asia-Pacific Region Global Earthquake and Volcanic Eruption Risk Management (G-EVER) project”____________________________________________72 Session VIII Abstracts __________________________________________________74 David Shelly “Dynamics of Migrating Earthquake Swarms at Yellowstone and Mount Rainier Volcanic Areas: Evidence for Fluid Triggering?”________________________________75 Takuya Nishimura “Detection of short-term slow slip events along the Nankai trough, southwest Japan using GNSS data”__________________________________________________76 Yehuda Bock, Brendan Crowell, and Diego Melgar “Mitigation of Earthquake Hazards with a Seismogeodetic Model as Demonstrated for the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-oki Earthquake”_78 Norio Matsumoto “Short-term slow slip events in the Kii peninsula by joint analysis of the AIST borehole strainmeter array and the NIED Hi-net tiltmeter array”__________________79 iii Bunichiro Shibazaki “3D quasi-dynamic modeling of cycles of megathrust earthquakes along the Japan Trench subduction zone considering high-speed friction”__________________80 Wayne Thatcher “Advantages and Limitations of Cluster Analysis in Interpreting Regional GPS Velocity Fields in California and Elsewhere”__________________________________81 Kazushige Obara “Characteristic activity of tremor as proxy for slow slip in the transition zone along the subducting plate interface”_______________________________________83 Justin Rubinstein “Repeating Earthquakes on the Parkfield Segment of the San Andreas: Do They Reload Themselves?”_____________________________________________85 Keynote Talk Abstracts _________________________________________________87 David Wald “Earthquake loss modeling on a global scale: balancing empirical & physics-based approaches”___________________________________________________________ 88 Meghan Miller “UNAVCO: Recent Earthquake Responses, Multi-hazard Networks, and Technology Development” _______________________________________________89 iv Introduction The UJNR Panel on Earthquake Research promotes advanced study toward a more fundamental understanding of the earthquake process and hazard estimation. The Ninth Joint meeting was extremely beneficial in furthering cooperation and deepening understanding of problems common to both the U.S. and Japan. The meeting included productive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frictional Strength, Rate-Dependence, and Healing in DFDP-1 Borehole Samples from the Alpine Fault, New Zealand
    TECTO-126306; No of Pages 8 Tectonophysics xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Frictional strength, rate-dependence, and healing in DFDP-1 borehole samples from the Alpine Fault, New Zealand Matt J. Ikari a,⁎, Brett M. Carpenter b,c, Achim J. Kopf a, Chris Marone c a MARUM, Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Germany b Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy c Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, USA article info abstract Article history: The Alpine Fault in southern New Zealand is a major plate-boundary fault zone that, according to various lines of Received 22 January 2014 evidence, may be nearing the end of its seismic cycle and approaching earthquake failure. In order to better char- Received in revised form 26 April 2014 acterize this fault and obtain a better understanding of its seismic potential, two pilot boreholes have been com- Accepted 2 May 2014 pleted as part of a larger drilling project. Samples representative of the major lithologic subdivisions of the fault Available online xxxx zone at shallow (~100 m) depths were recovered and investigated in laboratory friction experiments. We show here that materials from within and very near the principal slip zone (PSZ) tend to exhibit velocity strengthening Keywords: Fault frictional behavior, and restrengthen (heal) rapidly compared to samples of the wall rock recovered near the PSZ. Friction Fluid saturation causes the PSZ to be noticeably weaker than the surrounding cataclasites (μ = 0.45), and elim- Earthquake inates the velocity-weakening behavior in these cataclasites that is observed in dry tests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moment Magnitude and the Energy Magnitude: Common Roots
    The moment magnitude and the energy magnitude : common roots and differences Peter Bormann, Domenico Giacomo To cite this version: Peter Bormann, Domenico Giacomo. The moment magnitude and the energy magnitude : com- mon roots and differences. Journal of Seismology, Springer Verlag, 2010, 15 (2), pp.411-427. 10.1007/s10950-010-9219-2. hal-00646919 HAL Id: hal-00646919 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00646919 Submitted on 1 Dec 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Click here to download Manuscript: JOSE_MS_Mw-Me_final_Nov2010.doc Click here to view linked References The moment magnitude Mw and the energy magnitude Me: common roots 1 and differences 2 3 by 4 Peter Bormann and Domenico Di Giacomo* 5 GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 6 *Now at the International Seismological Centre, Pipers Lane, RG19 4NS Thatcham, UK 7 8 9 Abstract 10 11 Starting from the classical empirical magnitude-energy relationships, in this article the 12 derivation of the modern scales for moment magnitude M and energy magnitude M is 13 w e 14 outlined and critically discussed. The formulas for Mw and Me calculation are presented in a 15 way that reveals, besides the contributions of the physically defined measurement parameters 16 seismic moment M0 and radiated seismic energy ES, the role of the constants in the classical 17 Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-energy relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Slow Slip Events to Subsequent Earthquake Rupture
    Earthquake and tsunami forecasts: Relation of slow slip events to subsequent earthquake rupture Timothy H. Dixona,1, Yan Jiangb, Rocco Malservisia, Robert McCaffreyc, Nicholas Vossa, Marino Prottid, and Victor Gonzalezd aSchool of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620; bPacific Geoscience Centre, Geological Survey of Canada, BC, Canada V8L 4B2; cDepartment of Geology, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201; and dObservatorio Vulcanológico y Sismológico de Costa Rica, Universidad Nacional, Heredia 3000, Costa Rica Edited* by David T. Sandwell, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, and approved October 24, 2014 (received for review June 30, 2014) The 5 September 2012 Mw 7.6 earthquake on the Costa Rica sub- Geologic and Seismic Background duction plate boundary followed a 62-y interseismic period. High- The Nicoya Peninsula forms the western edge of the Caribbean precision GPS recorded numerous slow slip events (SSEs) in the plate, where the Cocos plate subducts beneath the Caribbean decade leading up to the earthquake, both up-dip and down-dip plate along the Middle American Trench at about 8 cm/y (3). The of seismic rupture. Deeper SSEs were larger than shallower ones region has a well-defined earthquake cycle, with large (M > 7) and, if characteristic of the interseismic period, release most lock- earthquakes in 1853, 1900, 1950 (M 7.7), and most recently 5 ing down-dip of the earthquake, limiting down-dip rupture and September 2012 (Mw 7.6). Smaller (M ∼ 7) events in 1978 and earthquake magnitude. Shallower SSEs were smaller, accounting 1990 have also occurred nearby (4). Large tsunamis have not for some but not all interseismic locking.
    [Show full text]
  • Fully-Coupled Simulations of Megathrust Earthquakes and Tsunamis in the Japan Trench, Nankai Trough, and Cascadia Subduction Zone
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Fully-coupled simulations of megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis in the Japan Trench, Nankai Trough, and Cascadia Subduction Zone Gabriel C. Lotto · Tamara N. Jeppson · Eric M. Dunham Abstract Subduction zone earthquakes can pro- strate that horizontal seafloor displacement is a duce significant seafloor deformation and devas- major contributor to tsunami generation in all sub- tating tsunamis. Real subduction zones display re- duction zones studied. We document how the non- markable diversity in fault geometry and struc- hydrostatic response of the ocean at short wave- ture, and accordingly exhibit a variety of styles lengths smooths the initial tsunami source relative of earthquake rupture and tsunamigenic behavior. to commonly used approach for setting tsunami We perform fully-coupled earthquake and tsunami initial conditions. Finally, we determine self-consistent simulations for three subduction zones: the Japan tsunami initial conditions by isolating tsunami waves Trench, the Nankai Trough, and the Cascadia Sub- from seismic and acoustic waves at a final sim- duction Zone. We use data from seismic surveys, ulation time and backpropagating them to their drilling expeditions, and laboratory experiments initial state using an adjoint method. We find no to construct detailed 2D models of the subduc- evidence to support claims that horizontal momen- tion zones with realistic geometry, structure, fric- tum transfer from the solid Earth to the ocean is tion, and prestress. Greater prestress and rate-and- important in tsunami generation. state friction parameters that are more velocity- weakening generally lead to enhanced slip, seafloor Keywords tsunami; megathrust earthquake; deformation, and tsunami amplitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Identification of Tsunamigenic Earthquakes Using GNSS
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Rapid identifcation of tsunamigenic earthquakes using GNSS ionospheric sounding Fabio Manta1,2,4*, Giovanni Occhipinti 3,4, Lujia Feng 1 & Emma M. Hill 1,2 The largest tsunamis are generated by seafoor uplift resulting from rupture of ofshore subduction- zone megathrusts. The rupture of the shallowest part of a megathrust often produces unexpected outsize tsunami relative to their seismic magnitude. These are so called ‘tsunami earthquakes’, which are difcult to identify rapidly using the current tsunami warning systems, even though, they produce some of the deadliest tsunami. We here introduce a new method to evaluate the tsunami risk by measuring ionospheric total electron content (TEC). We examine two Mw 7.8 earthquakes (one is a tsunami earthquake and the other is not) generated in 2010 by the Sunda megathrust, ofshore Sumatra, to demonstrate for the frst time that observations of ionospheric sounding from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) can be used to evaluate the tsunamigenic potential of earthquakes as early as 8 min after the mainshock. ‘Tsunami earthquakes’, as originally defned by Kanamori 1, are events generating tsunami with larger amplitude than expected from their seismic magnitude. Most tsunami earthquakes are generated by high levels of slip on the shallow megathrust, which results in large seafoor uplifs and hence very dangerous tsunami. Te shallow location of the slip—close to the subduction trench—means that the ruptures generating tsunami earthquakes are at signifcant distance from land-based monitoring networks, limiting our ability to quickly and accurately assess their magnitude and source parameters. Conventional approaches using various seismological methods2–4 or rapid inversion of GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) estimates of ground motion5 regularly encounter difculties in accurately estimating the uplif of the seafoor and consequently fail in predicting the tsunamigenic nature of tsunami earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 PPEM Newsletter
    PPEM Physical Properties of Earth Materials sites.agu.org/ppem/ Annual Newsletter November 2011 A Note From The Chair the National Academy of Sciences, ~ Judith Chester ~ and was recipient of the Walter H. Texas A&M University Bucher Medal of the American PPEM Chair Geophysical Union (1970) and the PPEM Dinner his year’s Fall AGU Meet- Arthur L. Day Medal of the Geo- ing will host several spe- logical Society of America (1973). The annual PPEM dinner will cial events important to the Join your colleagues at AGU and take place on Monday, Decem- T ber 5th. at Henry’s Hunan Res- PPEM communi- celebrate the life ty. The meeting of David Griggs taurant. Festivities will begin will open Sun- and his influen- with a cash bar at 6:00, followed day, December tial contributions by dinner at 7:30. The banquet 4th with a work- to solid-earth style menu will feature a variety shop organized geophysics. of meat, chicken, seafood and by Ivan Getting Recently, we vegetarian dishes showcasing and Terry Tullis launched a new the 3 cuisines of China’s Hu- on Technology PPEM website nan region. The restaurant is a for Research at that can be found short walk from the Moscone Elevated Pres- at sites.agu.org/ Center, at 110 Natoma Street, sure (see an- ppem/. The site San Francisco, CA 94105 in an nouncement on is under con- alley west of 2nd between How- page 6). In ad- struction so if ard and Mission. See page 8 for dition, AGU you have sugges- reservation information.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of DFDP-2B, Central Alpine Fault, New Zealand
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Faculty Scholarship for the College of the Sciences College of the Sciences 10-17-2017 Bedrock geology of DFDP-2B, central Alpine Fault, New Zealand Virginia Gail Toy Angela Halfpenny Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/cotsfac Part of the Geology Commons, and the Tectonics and Structure Commons 1 Bedrock Geology of DFDP-2B, Central Alpine 2 Fault, New Zealand. 3 Authors 4 Virginia Toy: Department of Geology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New 5 Zealand, [email protected], +64 479 7519. 6 Rupert Sutherland: School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of 7 Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand, [email protected], +64 4 463 8 6422. 9 John Townend: School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of 10 Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand, [email protected], +64 4 463 5411. 11 Michael J. Allen: Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow 12 Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UK; [email protected]; +44 79 585 342 68. 13 Leeza Becroft: Department of Geology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New 14 Zealand, [email protected]; +64 3 479 7519. 15 Austin Boles: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, 1100 N 14 16 University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected]; +1.801.995.3197. 17 Carolyn Boulton: School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, 18 Liverpool L69 3GP, UK; School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences, Victoria 19 University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; [email protected]; 20 +64 21 111 1800.
    [Show full text]
  • A Test for the Mediterranean Tsunami Warning System Mohammad Heidarzadeh1* , Ocal Necmioglu2 , Takeo Ishibe3 and Ahmet C
    Heidarzadeh et al. Geosci. Lett. (2017) 4:31 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-017-0097-0 RESEARCH LETTER Open Access Bodrum–Kos (Turkey–Greece) Mw 6.6 earthquake and tsunami of 20 July 2017: a test for the Mediterranean tsunami warning system Mohammad Heidarzadeh1* , Ocal Necmioglu2 , Takeo Ishibe3 and Ahmet C. Yalciner4 Abstract Various Tsunami Service Providers (TSPs) within the Mediterranean Basin supply tsunami warnings including CAT-INGV (Italy), KOERI-RETMC (Turkey), and NOA/HL-NTWC (Greece). The 20 July 2017 Bodrum–Kos (Turkey–Greece) earth- quake (Mw 6.6) and tsunami provided an opportunity to assess the response from these TSPs. Although the Bodrum– Kos tsunami was moderate (e.g., runup of 1.9 m) with little damage to properties, it was the frst noticeable tsunami in the Mediterranean Basin since the 21 May 2003 western Mediterranean tsunami. Tsunami waveform analysis revealed that the trough-to-crest height was 34.1 cm at the near-feld tide gauge station of Bodrum (Turkey). Tsunami period band was 2–30 min with peak periods at 7–13 min. We proposed a source fault model for this tsunami with the length and width of 25 and 15 km and uniform slip of 0.4 m. Tsunami simulations using both nodal planes produced almost same results in terms of agreement between tsunami observations and simulations. Diferent TSPs provided tsunami warnings at 10 min (CAT-INGV), 19 min (KOERI-RETMC), and 18 min (NOA/HL-NTWC) after the earthquake origin time. Apart from CAT-INGV, whose initial Mw estimation difered 0.2 units with respect to the fnal value, the response from the other two TSPs came relatively late compared to the desired warning time of ~ 10 min, given the difculties for timely and accurate calculation of earthquake magnitude and tsunami impact assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Tsunami Hazard
    ESTIMATING THE THREAT OF TSUNAMIGENIC EARTHQUAKES AND EARTHQUAKE INDUCED-LANDSLIDE TSUNAMI IN THE CARIBBEAN WILLIAM R. MCCANN Earth Scientific Consultants Westminster, CO 80021, USA Deformation along the margin of the Caribbean Plate is the principal cause of the tsunami threat in the Caribbean. That margin parallels the northern coast of South America, the Lesser Antilles, and extends along the Greater Antilles from Puerto Rico through Jamaica. The eastern boundary of the Caribbean plate near the Lesser Antilles is the locus of subduction of Atlantic seafloor. At least three distinct, shallow tectonic regimes parallel the margin. They are: an outer tectonic belt where the North America Plate bends to enter the subduction zone, the main interface or zone of contact between the plates, and an inner zone of intraplate activity in the overriding Caribbean Plate. The level of seismic activity and tsunami potential in each of these zones is influenced by the presence of aseismic ridges on the downgoing plate. Ridges may increase the probability of tsunami or slow earthquakes, by reactivating thrust faults in the accretionary prism. The northeastern corner of the Caribbean Plate margin has a smooth transition from the relatively simple subduction zone in the Northern Lesser Antilles into a region of oblique convergence. It is a complex margin dominated by microplate tectonics from near Puerto Rico through Hispaniola. Here too the same three tectonic zones can be defined, but the third zone, “intraplate activity in the Caribbean Plate”, is more clearly delineated as microplate deformation in a wide plate boundary zone. Strike-slip tectonics dominates the region from Haiti westward to the northern coast of Honduras.
    [Show full text]
  • The 25 October 2010 Sumatra Tsunami Earthquake: Slip in a Slow Patch Susan L
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 38, L14306, doi:10.1029/2011GL047864, 2011 The 25 October 2010 Sumatra tsunami earthquake: Slip in a slow patch Susan L. Bilek,1 E. Robert Engdahl,2 Heather R. DeShon,3 and Maya El Hariri1 Received 20 April 2011; revised 13 June 2011; accepted 15 June 2011; published 28 July 2011. [1] Various models for the generation of tsunami earthquakes and shallow afterslip [e.g., Hsu et al., 2006; earthquakes have been proposed, including shallow Konca et al., 2008] (Figure 1). Approximately 700 km north, earthquake slip through low strength materials. Because another tsunami earthquake may have occurred along these physical fault conditions would likely affect other Simeulue Island in 1907 [Kanamori et al., 2010]. earthquakes in the same rupture zone, source properties of [3] Given that models link shallow slip in weak near‐trench other events may provide a guide to locations of tsunami materials to tsunami earthquake occurrence, an important earthquakes. The 25 October 2010 Mw = 7.8 Mentawai question is whether these fault conditions also impact the tsunami earthquake and surrounding events provide a test rupture of other events in the same area. Our efforts here of this hypothesis. We determine slip patterns for the address this question by first defining the rupture area and mainshock and relocate aftershocks, with the majority source characteristics of the 2010 event as well as relocating occurring in the near trench region. The two largest aftershocks of the event. We then compare the rupture extent magnitude aftershocks occurred within the downdip end of to source parameters computed for other regional earthquakes the mainshock rupture area and have long moment‐ in order to assess the possibility of consistent slow behavior normalized rupture duration, likely related to fault zone along specific patches of the plate interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of DFDP-2B, Central Alpine Fault, New Zealand
    1 Bedrock Geology of DFDP-2B, Central Alpine 2 Fault, New Zealand. 3 Authors 4 Virginia Toy: Department of Geology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New 5 Zealand, [email protected], +64 479 7519. 6 Rupert Sutherland: School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of 7 Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand, [email protected], +64 4 463 8 6422. 9 John Townend: School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of 10 Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand, [email protected], +64 4 463 5411. 11 Michael J. Allen: Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow 12 Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UK; [email protected]; +44 79 585 342 68. 13 Leeza Becroft: Department of Geology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New 14 Zealand, [email protected]; +64 3 479 7519. 15 Austin Boles: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, 1100 N 14 16 University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected]; +1.801.995.3197. 17 Carolyn Boulton: School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, 18 Liverpool L69 3GP, UK; School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences, Victoria 19 University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; [email protected]; 20 +64 21 111 1800. 21 Brett Carpenter: School of Geology & Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA. 22 [email protected]; +1 405 325 3372. 23 Alan Cooper: Department of Geology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New 24 Zealand; [email protected]; +64 3 479 7519.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustal Dynamics 2016: Unified Understanding of Geodynamic Processes at Different Time and Length Scales
    International Symposium Crustal Dynamics 2016: Unified Understanding of Geodynamic Processes at Different Time and Length Scales July 19-22, 2016, Takayama, Japan July 19 (Tue.) Field trip to the Atotsugawa Fault July 20 (Wed.) 9:00 Opening 9:05 A01 Overview of the Crustal Dynamics Project Yoshihisa IIO* 9:30 A02 Strategy to Evaluate the Stress in the Crust Toru MATSUZAWA* 9:50 A03 Transient Deformation and Stress From Postseismic Deformation of Great Megathrust Earthquakes Roland BÜRGMANN*, Yan HU, Naoki UCHIDA 10:10 A04 Stress Orientations in Subduction Zones: Fault Strength and Seismic Coupling Jeanne HARDEBECK* 10:30 Break 10:45 A05 Precise focal mechanisms of the induced earthquake swarm by the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake by a dense seismic observation Tomomi OKADA*, Takashi NAKAYAMA, Satoshi HIRAHARA, Shuichiro HORI, Toshiya SATO, Toru MATSUZAWA 11:05 A06 Stress and strength heterogeneities and its relationship with induced seismic activities associated with the Tohoku-Oki Earthquake Keisuke YOSHIDA*, Akira HASEGAWA, Toru MATSUZAWA 11:25 A07 Relationship Between Mainshock Rupture and Aftershock Sequence Based on Highly Resolved Hypocenter, Focal Mechanism Distributions Yohei YUKUTAKE*, Yoshihisa IIO 11:45 A08 Temporal Stress Changes at Mount Ontake Volcano Toshiko TERAKAWA* 12:05 A09 Seismic Anisotropy From the Mantle through the Crust at a Transpressional Plate Boundary, Alpine Fault, New Zealand Martha Kane SAVAGE*, Carolin M. BOESE, Calum J. CHAMBERLAIN, John TOWNEND, Sapthala KARALLIYADDA, Daniel ZIETLOW, Anne SHEEHAN 12:25 Lunch
    [Show full text]