DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 43/Friday, March 5, 1999/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 43/Friday, March 5, 1999/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 1999 / Notices 10673 has been submitted to the Office of Project-Based Section 8 Housing Federal property. This Notice is also Management and Budget (OMB) for Assistance Contracts. published in order to comply with the review, as required by the Paperwork OMB Control Number, if applicable: December 12, 1988 Court Order in Reduction Act. The Department is 2502±0528. National Coalition for the Homeless v. soliciting public comments on the Agency form numbers, if applicable: Veterans Administration, No 88±2503± subject proposal. None. OG (D.D.C.). Members of affected public: Not for DATES: Comments due date: March 12, Properties reviewed are listed in this 1999. profit institutions. Notice according to the following Estimation of the total numbers of categories: Suitable/available, suitable/ ADDRESSES: Interested persons are hours needed to prepare the information unavailable, suitable/to be excess, and invited to submit comments regarding collection including number of unsuitable. The properties listed in the this proposal. Comments must be respondents, frequency of response, and three suitable categories have been received within (7) days from the date hours of response: The estimated reviewed by the landholding agencies, of this Notice. Comments should refer to number of respondents are 250, the total and each agency has transmitted to the proposal by name and/or OMB annual responses are 370, and the HUD: (1) Its intention to make the approval number should be sent to: annual burden hours are 5,600. property available for use to assist the Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., HUD Desk Officer, homeless, (2) its intention to declare the Office of Management and Budget, New Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as amended. property excess to the agency's needs, or Executive Office Building, Washington, Dated: February 25, 1999. (3) a statement of the reasons that the DC 20503. property cannot be declared excess or David S. Cristy, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: made available for use as facilities to Director, IRM Policy and Management assist the homeless. Wayne Eddins, Reports Management Division. Officer, Department of Housing and Properties listed as suitable/available [FR Doc. 99±5454 Filed 3±4±99; 8:45 am] Urban Development, 451 7th Street, will be available exclusively for NW, Washington, DC 20410, telephone BILLING CODE 4210±27±M homeless use for a period of 60 days (202) 708±3055 (this is not a toll-free from the date of this Notice. Homeless number. Copies of the proposed forms assistance providers interested in any DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND such property should send a written and other available documents URBAN DEVELOPMENT submitted to OMB maybe obtained from expression of interest to HHS, addressed Mr. Eddins. [Docket No. FR±4432±N±09] to Brian Rooney, Division of Property Management, Program Support Center, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Federal Property Suitable as Facilities HHS, room 5B±41, 5600 Fishers Lane, Notice informs the public that the To Assist the Homeless Rockville, MD 20857; (301) 443±2265. Department of Housing and Urban (This is not a toll-free number.) HHS Development (HUD) has submitted to AGENCY: Office of the Assistant will mail to the interested provider an OMB, for emergency processing, an Secretary for Community Planning and application packet, which will include information collection package with Development, HUD. instructions for completing the respect to the implementation of ACTION: Notice. application. In order to maximize the improved administration of over 20,000 SUMMARY: This Notice identifies opportunity to utilize a suitable Section 8 contracts. These contracts property, providers should submit their represent an investment of over $6 unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by written expressions of interest as soon billion to support the physical and as possible. For complete details financial well-being of affordable HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless. concerning the processing of housing on a nationwide basis. applications, the reader is encouraged to This Notice is soliciting comments FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: refer to the interim rule governing this from members of the public and affected Mark Johnston, room 7256, Department program, 24 CFR part 581. agencies concerning the proposed of Housing and Urban Development, For properties listed as suitable/to be collection of information to: (1) Evaluate 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC excess, that property may, if whether the proposed collection of 20410; telephone (202) 708±1226; TTY subsequently accepted as excess by information is necessary for the proper number for the hearing- and speech- GSA, be made available for use by the performance of the functions of the impaired (202) 708±2365 (these homeless in accordance with applicable agency, including whether the telephone numbers are not toll-free), or law, subject to screening for other information will have practical utility; call the toll-free Title V information line Federal use. At the appropriate time, (2) evaluate the accuracy of the agency's at 1±800±927±7588. HUD will publish the property in a estimate of the burden of the proposed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Notice showing it as either suitable/ collection of information; (3) enhance accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and available or suitable/unavailable. the quality, utility, and clarity of the section 501 of the Stewart B. McKinney For properties listed as suitable/ information to be collected; and (4) Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. unavailable, the landholding agency has minimize the burben of the collection of 11411), as amended, HUD is publishing decided that the property cannot be information on those who are to this Notice to identify Federal buildings declared excess or made available for respond; including through the use of and other real property that HUD has use to assist the homeless, and the appropriate automated collection reviewed for suitability for use to assist property will not be available. techniques or other forms of information the homeless. The properties were Properties listed as unsuitable will technology, e.g., permitting electronic reviewed using information provided to not be made available for any other submission of responses. HUD by Federal landholding agencies purpose for 20 days from the date of this This Notice also lists the following regarding unutilized and underutilized Notice. Homeless assistance providers information: buildings and real property controlled interested in a review by HUD of the Title of Proposal: Request for by such agencies or by GSA regarding determination of unsuitability should ProposalsÐContract Administrators for its inventory of excess or surplus call the toll free information at 1±800± VerDate 03-MAR-99 10:46 Mar 04, 1999 Jkt 183247 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.XXX pfrm02 PsN: 05MRN1 10674 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 1999 / Notices 927±7588 for detailed instructions or Landholding Agency: Air Force GSA Number: 4±U±DE±462. write a letter to Mark Johnston at the Property Number: 18199010239 Georgia Status: Unutilized address listed at the beginning of this Federal Building Notice. Included in the request for Comment: 1232 sq. ft.; stucco-wood frame; most recent useÐhousing. 109 N. Main Street review should be the property address Lafayette Co: Walker GA 30728± Bldg. 613 (including zip code), the date of Landholding Agency: GSA Point Arena Air Force Station Property Number: 54199910014 publication in the Federal Register, the Co: Mendocino CA 95468±5000 Status: Excess landholding agency, and the property Landholding Agency: Air Force Comment: approx. 4761 sq. ft., does not meet number. Property Number: 18199010241 ADA requirements for accessibility, For more information regarding Status: Unutilized easements/reservations restrictions, Comment: 1232 sq. ft.; stucco-wood frame; particular properties identified in this historic protective covenants most recent useÐhousing. Notice (i.e., acreage, floor plan, existing GSA Number: 4±G±GA±858. sanitary facilities, exact street address), Bldg. 614 Idaho providers should contact the Point Arena Air Force Station appropriate landholding agencies at the Co: Mendocino CA 95468±5000 Bldg. 516 following addresses: AIR FORCE: Ms. Landholding Agency: Air Force Mountain Home Air Force Base Property Number: 18199010242 Mountain Home Co: Elmore ID 86348± Barbara Jenkins, Air Force Real Estate Status: Unutilized Landholding Agency: Air Force Agency, (Area-MI), Bolling Air Force Comment: 1232 sq. ft.; stucco-wood frame; Property Number: 18199520004 Base, 112 Luke Avenue, Suite 104, most recent useÐhousing. Status: Excess Building 5683, Washington, DC 20332± Bldg. 615 Comment: 4928 sq. ft., 1 story wood frame, 8020; (202) 767±4184; GSA: Mr. Brian Point Arena Air Force Station presence of lead paint and asbestos, most K. Polly, Assistant Commissioner, Co: Mendocino CA 95468±5000 recent useÐoffices. General Services Administration, Office Landholding Agency: Air Force Bldg. 2201 of Property Disposal, 18th and F Streets, Property Number: 18199010243 Mountain Home Air Force Base NW, Washington, DC 20405; (202) 501± Status: Unutilized Mountain Home Co: Elmore ID 83648± Landholding Agency: Air Force 2059; COE: Ms. Shirley Middleswarth, Comment: 1232 sq. ft.; stucco-wood frame; most recent useÐhousing. Property Number: 18199520005 Army Corps
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elmendorf Air Force Base (Afb)
    ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE (AFB) Contract Details Contract Type: Energy Efficiency; Energy Savings Performance Contract; Guaranteed Energy Savings; Natural Gas Facility Size: Nearly 800 buildings; Over 9.3 million sq. feet Energy Project Size: Elmendorf Air Force Base, located in Anchorage, Alaska, comprises nearly 800 facilities and spans 9.3 million square feet of multi-use space. Ameresco $48.8 million implemented an ESPC, which included supplying the base with natural gas and decentralizing the heating system. Energy Savings: Customer Benefits (CHPP) with a modern and high-efficiency system. Over 1 million MMBtu The Elmendorf Air Force Base entered a partnership Ameresco’s insightful and thorough review of the with Ameresco to design and implement an energy project concept indicated the infrastructure to support savings performance contract (ESPC). The project the CHPP was failing and too expensive to repair. After Capacity: utilized locally available natural gas as an energy additional discussions concerning security and 5.6 MW component. Ameresco took into consideration the Elmendorf’s future growth projections, converting the setting and brief construction time frame for on-time CHPP to a decentralized heating system with the project completion. Elmendorf achieved its sustain- capability to receive their full electricity requirements ability goals and reduced energy use without redundantly from the local utility became the project’s compromising its mission. This project alone made new direction. Elmendorf’s energy reduction goals and has had a Summary major impact on the Air Force’s goals with annual Thorough consideration to provide the Ameresco developed the new project scope, managed a energy savings of over 1 million MMBtu.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Land Use Study
    Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study United States Army, Fort Wainwright United States Air Force, Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks North Star Borough, Planning Department July 2006 Produced by ASCG Incorporated of Alaska Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Fairbanks Joint Land Use Study This study was prepared under contract with Fairbanks North Star Borough with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of Fairbanks North Star Borough and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Historical Hangar, Fort Wainwright Army Base Eielson Air Force Base i Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Table of Contents 1.0 Study Purpose and Process................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Planning Area................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Participating Stakeholders.............................................................................................. 4 1.5 Public Participation........................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Issue Identification........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
    324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con­ struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte­ nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil­ ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Jurisdiction in OSHA, Region 10 Version 2018.2
    Guide to Jurisdiction in OSHA, Region 10 Version 2018.2 General Principles - Federal civilian employers are covered by OSHA throughout the four-state region. State, county, municipal and other non-federal public employers (except tribal government employers) are covered by state programs in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. There is no state program in Idaho, and OSHA’s coverage of public employers in Idaho is limited to the federal sector. OSHA regulates most private employers in Idaho with exceptions noted below. Industry / Location State Coverage OSHA Coverage Air Carriers1 Washington, Oregon and Alaska: Air Washington, Oregon and Alaska: carrier operations on the ground only. Aircraft cabin crewmembers’ exposures to only hazardous chemicals (HAZCOM), bloodborne pathogens, noise, recordkeeping, and access to employee exposure and medical records. Idaho: Air carrier operations on the ground. Aircraft cabin crewmembers’ exposures to only hazardous chemicals (HAZCOM), bloodborne pathogens, noise, recordkeeping, and access to employee exposure and medical records. Commercial Diving Washington, Oregon and Alaska: Washington, Oregon, and Alaska: Employers with diving operations staged Employers with diving operations from shore, piers, docks or other fixed staged from boats or other vessels afloat locations. on navigable waters 2. Idaho: All diving operations for covered employers. 1 The term “air carrier refers to private employers engaged in air transportation of passengers and/or cargo. The term “aircraft cabin crew member” refers to employees working in the cabin during flight such as flight attendants or medical staff; however, the term does not include pilots. 2 In the state of Washington, for vessels afloat, such as boats, ships and barges moored at a pier or dock, DOSH’s jurisdiction ends at the edge of the dock or pier and OSHA’s jurisdiction begins at the foot of the gangway or other means of access to the vessel; this principle applies to all situations involving moored vessels, including construction, longshoring, and ship repair.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Asset Management Plan For
    Digital Asset Management Plan for ____________________________________________ Project Name (if this is a Project DAMP) ____________________________________________ Process/Name of Activity (if this is a General DAMP) ____________________________________________ Unit Name Approved by: _________________________ __________________________ ________________________ Unit Director (Signature) Unit Director (Print Name) Date Additional signatories: For General DAMP: Plan Administrator _________________________ ___________________________ ________________________ Signature Print Name Date For Project DAMP: Plan Administrator _________________________ ___________________________ ________________________ Signature Print Name Date Project Principal Investigator/Lead _________________________ ___________________________ ________________________ Signature Print Name Date Digital Asset Management Plan Tables of Contents 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 3 2. Strategic Context ............................................................................................................... 4 3. DAMP Definition & Scope .................................................................................................. 6 4. Asset Description: Metadata & Content ............................................................................. 9 5. Asset Usage Goals ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE BUDGET and AUDIT COMMITTEE Division of Legislative Audit
    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE Division of Legislative Audit P.O. Box 113300 Juneau, AK 99811-3300 (907) 465-3830 FAX (907) 465-2347 [email protected] SUMMARY OF: A Special Report on the Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Spill Prevention and Response, Oil and Hazardous Substance Release Prevention and Response Fund, March 18, 2008. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT In accordance with Title 24 of the Alaska Statutes and a special request by the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, we have conducted a performance audit of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Division of Spill Prevention and Response (Division). Specifically, we were asked to review the expenditures and cost recovery revenues from the Oil and Hazardous Substance Release Prevention and Response Fund (Fund). REPORT CONCLUSIONS The conclusions are as follows: all expenditures are not recorded according to activities compliance with statutory cost recovery requirements is unclear Division is not efficiently and effectively recovering costs most expenditures were appropriate legal costs need an improved budgeting process certain contractual oversight practices are weak detailed information on the Fund’s financial activities is incomplete During the audit we reviewed a $9 million reimbursable services agreement between the Division and the Department of Law for legal services related to two transit pipeline spills on the North Slope. The contract was funded by the Response Account without specific legislative appropriation. It would have been more prudent to follow the established legislative budget process, especially for long-term legal activities. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Division Director should improve the accountability for the Division’s activities and reporting of Fund expenditures.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 59/Monday, March 29, 1999/Rules
    14972 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 1999 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Airspace Management, Federal Aviation comments on the proposal to the FAA. Administration, 800 Independence The FAA received 11 written comments Federal Aviation Administration Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; in response to the proposal to modify telephone (202) 267±8783. the Anchorage, Alaska, Terminal Area 14 CFR Part 93 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (Notice 97±14). These commenters [Docket No. 29029; Amendment No. 93±77] included the following parties: the Air Background Transport Association; Anchorage RIN 2120±AG45 On December 17, 1991, the FAA International Airport; Alaskan Aviation published, in the Federal Register, the Anchorage, Alaska, Terminal Area Safety Foundation; Alaska Airmen's Airspace Reclassification Final Rule (56 Association, Inc.; Department of the AGENCY: Federal Aviation FR 65638). This rule reclassified various Army; State of Alaska Department of Administration (FAA), DOT. airspace designations and deleted the Transportation and Public Facilities; ACTION: Final rule. term ``Airport Traffic Area.'' These and other concerned citizens. All changes were designed to apply to all comments received were considered SUMMARY: This action amends similarly designated airspace areas. before making a determination on this regulations regarding aircraft operations However, Title 14 of the Code of Federal final rule. The following is an analysis in the Anchorage, Alaska, Terminal Regulations (14 CFR) part 93, subpart D of the substantive comments received Area. Specifically, this action revises was not amended to reflect the airspace and the Agency's responses. the description of the Anchorage, reclassification effort. Alaska, Terminal Area and the In this action, the FAA amends the Analysis of Comments Communications requirements for regulations set forth at part 93, subpart Lake Hood Segment operating in the area; adds a new D, to reflect airspace designations in the segment, with communication and vicinity of Anchorage, Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • DAMP Project - Wikipedia
    3/29/2020 DAMP Project - Wikipedia DAMP Project The Downrange Anti-missile Measurement Program or DAMP was an applied research project to obtain scientific data, just prior to and during re-entry, on intermediate- and intercontinental-range ballistic missiles as they returned to earth. The program was funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) under the technical direction of the Army Ordnance Missile Command (AOMC) during the period 1 January 1959 through 30 September 1963. Contents Project organization USAS American Mariner Electromagnetic Research Laboratory Data Analysis Laboratory DAMP ship characteristics DAMP ship instrumentation Radar Data recording Communications equipment Tracking Pedestals Mission Completion Further reading See also External links Project organization The downrange facility was a Liberty-class merchant vessel renovated and converted for its technical assignment. Its measurement equipment complex included C-band, L-band and UHF radars; digital and analog recorders; gyroscope stabilization; timing generators; mode switching; telemetry acquisition apparatus; radiometers and riometers; boresight cine-TV and other photographic systems; communications and Transit Satellite navigation system. As a complementary measurement facility to the DAMP ship, the Electromagnetic Research Laboratory at Moorestown, New Jersey, contained C- and L-band radar measurement equipment complete with digital and analog recording system in a range-support-tower combination for full-scale cross-section measurements under static conditions with orthogonal polarizations. Recorded analog data from this facility were provided for immediate use. Data from both measurement facilities underwent necessary processing at the Riverton, New Jersey, data reduction center, a part of the Data Analysis Laboratory. Foremost among DAMP Program objectives were to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAMP_Project 1/7 3/29/2020 DAMP Project - Wikipedia Support AMM system designs.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 193/Friday, October 4, 2013/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2013 / Notices 61851 11. Type of Information Collection this collection contact Anitra Johnson at would constitute a clearly unwarranted Request: Reinstatement without change 410–786–0609). invasion of personal privacy. of a previously approved collection; 13. Type of Information Collection Name of Committee: National Human Title of Information Collection: Request: Extension of a currently Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Medicare Geographic Classification approved collection; Title of Panel Extramural Gene Function Research Review Board (MGCRB) Procedures and Information Collection: State Children’s Initiative (R21) UDP. Supporting Regulations; Use: The Health Insurance Program and Date: November 27, 2013. information submitted by the hospitals Supporting Regulations; Use: States Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. is used to determine the validity of the must submit title XXI plans and Agenda: To review and evaluate grant hospitals’ requests and the discretion amendments for approval by the applications. Secretary. We use the plan and its Place: National Human Genome Research used by the Medicare Geographic Institute, 4076 Conference Room, 5635 Classification Review Board (MGCRB) subsequent amendments to determine if Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, in reviewing and making decisions the state has met the requirements of (Telephone Conference Call). regarding hospitals’ requests for title XXI. Information provided in the Contact Person: Keith McKenney, Ph.D., geographic reclassification. Form state plan, state plan amendments, and Scientific Review Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Number: CMS–R–138 (OCN: 0938– from the other information we are Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 0573); Frequency: Yearly; Affected collecting will be used by advocacy 20814, 301–594–4280, mckenneyk@ Public: Business or other for-profits and groups, beneficiaries, applicants, other mail.nih.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-2001 Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station Mark J. Shoviak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Shoviak, Mark J., "Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station" (2001). Theses and Dissertations. 4696. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/4696 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DECISION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR A REMOTE ALASKAN AIR STATION THESIS Mark J. Shoviak, Captain, USAF AFIT/GEE/ENV/01M-20 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U. S. Government. AFIT/GEE/ENV/01M-20 DECISION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR A REMOTE ALASKAN AIR STATION THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Systems and Engineering Management Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Environmental Management Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018
    Request for Qualifications Arizona Department of Solicitation No. Administration ADSPO18-00007887 State Procurement Office Description: 100 N 15th Ave., Suite 201 2018 Professional Services List Phoenix, AZ 85007 Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 ATTACHMENT 1 ........ OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE FORM ...................................... 2 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 3 1.0 ..... FIVE (5) EXAMPLE PROJECTS ...................................................................... 3 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 5 2.0 ..... EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ......................................................................... 5 3.0 ..... FIRMS EXPERIENCE AND REVENUE ........................................................... 7 4.0 ..... FIRMS SERVICES ........................................................................................... 7 5.0 ..... EXPERIENCE REFERENCES: ........................................................................ 8 ATTACHMENT 2-B .... ORGANIZATION PROFILE .................................................. 10 ATTACHMENT 3-A .... METHOD PROPOSAL .......................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT 3-B .... KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSAL ........................................... 13 ATTACHMENT 3-C ... PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS ..................................... 29 ATTACHMENT 3-D ... PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE ........................................... 31 ATTACHMENT 3-E .... ISRAEL
    [Show full text]