DOCSLIB.ORG

Lao – PDR Mcgovern-Dole Food for Education Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lao – PDR Mcgovern-Dole Food for Education Project Foreign Agricultural Service, United States Department of Agriculture Lao – PDR McGovern-Dole Food for Education Project Final Evaluation October 2018 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Department of Agriculture. It was prepared independently by NRMC. Decentralized Evaluation for USDA McGovern Dole FY14 End- Line Evaluation in Lao PDR (FY14-16) The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) McGovern-Dole Food for Education Program in Lao PDR was implemented by World Food Programme from 2014-2018. The aim of the program is to improve the literacy, health, and dietary practices of primary-school-aged children. Agreement Number: FFE-439-2014/049-00 Project Duration: 2014-2018 Implemented by: World Food Programme Evaluation Authored by: NRMC Evaluation Manager: Utomo Tjipto Team Leader: Bhaskar Goswami Team Members: Malay Das, Ankita Singh, Prapti Barooah DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Agriculture or the United States Government. based decisionbased making - Decentralized Evaluation Decentralized evidence evaluation for USDA Mc-GOVERN DOLE FY14END-LINE EVALUATION IN LAO PDR [FY 14-16] Report of End line Evaluation October 2018 WFP Country Office Lao PDR Mr. Utomo Tjipto, WFP Lao PDR Evaluation Manager Prepared by Team Leader: Bhaskar Goswami Team Member: Malay Das, Ankita Singh, Prapti Barooah Acknowledgements The NRMC evaluation team wishes to acknowledge the guidance, support, and cooperation received from all the participants in the evaluation. NRMC takes this opportunity to extend sincere thanks to the distinguished Government officials at the Ministries, provincial level and district level for their time and precious inputs. The NRMC Evaluation Team expresses its gratitude to Ada Ihenachor and Tracy Johnson from USDA for their valuable suggestions and guidance for the evaluation. We would like to thank the members of RBB, Felicity Chard and Yumiko Kanemitsu, for sharing their useful insights. Their suggestions have immensely helped in enhancing the design of the evaluation. We would also like to thank the staff of international development agencies (The World Bank, UNICEF, UNFPA, Australian DFAT, Plan International, Big Brother Mouse, SNV, and GIZ) who kindly took the time to meet us and give us their views on the school feeding programme in Lao PDR. NRMC wishes to sincerely acknowledge the support and guidance received from the staff of the WFP Lao PDR Country Office, for assisting with the planning of and facilitating the evaluation mission, and for supplying documentation, especially to Sarah Gordon Gibson, Nanna Skau, Utomo Tjipto, Yangxia Lee, Serena Mithbaokar, Air Sensomphone, Khizar Ashraf, OuthaiSihalath, Phetsamone Southalack, Kevin Howley, Thai Thao, and the WFP staff from the Pakse and LuangNamtha sub-offices. We are grateful to the team from Geo-Sys for their partnership with the NRMC evaluation team throughout the period of evaluation, particularly for their untiring efforts for data collection. Last but not the least, the evaluation team wishes to acknowledge the cooperation received from all informants, including school children, school head, teachers, parents, cooks, storekeepers and VEDC members, during the primary survey. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are those of the Evaluation Team and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by WFP of the opinions expressed. The designation employed and the presentation of material in maps do no imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers. USDA Mc-Govern Dole FY 14 End-line Evaluation in Lao PDR Final Report Table of Contents Acknowledgements List of Acronyms Executive Summary 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. The subject of the Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Context ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Evaluation Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Evaluation Findings ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1. The relevance of MGD SFP FY14 in Lao PDR ....................................................................................... 10 2.2. The effectiveness of MGD-SFP FY14 (based on performance indicators) ........................... 12 2.3. Impact of MGD-SFP FY14 .............................................................................................................................. 26 2.4. The efficiency of MGD-SFP FY14 ............................................................................................................... 28 2.5. Sustainability of MGD-SFP FY14 ................................................................................................................ 30 2.6. Theory of Change for MGD-SFP FY14 ..................................................................................................... 33 3. Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 33 3.1. Overall Assessment/ Conclusions............................................................................................................. 33 3.2. Good practices and Lessons Learned ...................................................................................................... 36 3.3. Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 38 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................... 42 Annex A: Scope of Work for End-Line Evaluation ...................................................................................... 42 Annex B: Stakeholders and Report Users ....................................................................................................... 44 Annex C: Map of the Intervention Area .......................................................................................................... 48 Annex D: List of Districts under MGD FY14 ................................................................................................... 49 Annex E: Planned Outcomes .................................................................................................................................. 50 Annex F: Break-up of Contribution from Non-USDA Funding for WFP School Feeding Programme .......................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Annex G: Project-Level Results Framework .................................................................................................. 60 Annex H: Theory of Change .................................................................................................................................... 64 i USDA Mc-Govern Dole FY 14 End-line Evaluation in Lao PDR Final Report Annex I: Role of WFP's partners in MGD SFP .............................................................................................. 70 Annex J: Status of Poverty, Nutrition and Education in Lao PDR, 2012 ........................................ 71 Annex K: ODA Assistance to Lao PDR ............................................................................................................... 74 Annex L: Evaluation Mission Schedule ............................................................................................................ 78 Annex M: Evaluation Matrix ................................................................................................................................... 85 Annex N: Evaluation Approach and Methodology ...................................................................................... 98 Annex O: Documents Gathered ......................................................................................................................... 107 Annex P: List of Sample Schools ....................................................................................................................... 111 Annex Q: End-line Values of Key Indicators ............................................................................................... 115 Annex R: End-line Values of Other Key Performance Indicators .................................................... 121 Annex S: Results from EGRA sub-tests ......................................................................................................... 131 Annex T: Baseline and MTE recommendations and follow up ......................................................... 134 List of Tables Table 1: Target beneficiaries disaggregated by sex ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ethnic Group Development Plan LAO: Northern Rural Infrastructure
    Ethnic Group Development Plan Project Number: 42203 May 2016 LAO: Northern Rural Infrastructure Development Sector Project - Additional Financing Prepared by Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the Asian Development Bank. This ethnic group development plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Ethnic Group Development Plan Nam Beng Irrigation Subproject Tai Lue Village, Lao PDR TABLE OF CONTENTS Topics Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A10-1 A. Introduction A10-1 B. The Nam Beng Irrigation Subproject A10-1 C. Ethnic Groups in the Subproject Areas A10-2 D. Socio-Economic Status A10-2 a. Land Issues A10-3 b. Language Issues A10-3 c. Gender Issues A10-3 d. Social Health Issues A10-4 E. Potential Benefits and Negative Impacts of the Subproject A10-4 F. Consultation and Disclosure A10-5 G. Monitoring A10-5 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A10-6 1.1 Objectives of the Ethnic Groups Development Plan A10-6 1.2 The Northern Rural Infrastructure Development Sector Project A10-6 (NRIDSP) 1.3 The Nam Beng Irrigation Subproject A10-6 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of Hoya (Asclepiadaceae) in the Flora of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam
    Turczaninowia 20 (3): 103–147 (2017) ISSN 1560–7259 (print edition) DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.20.3.10 TURCZANINOWIA http://turczaninowia.asu.ru ISSN 1560–7267 (online edition) УДК 582.394:581.4 Preliminary checklist of Hoya (Asclepiadaceae) in the flora of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam L. V. Averyanov1, Van The Pham2, T. V. Maisak1, Tuan Anh Le3, Van Canh Nguyen4, Hoang Tuan Nguyen5, Phi Tam Nguyen6, Khang Sinh Nguyen2, Vu Khoi Nguyen7, Tien Hiep Nguyen8, M. Rodda9 1 Komarov Botanical Institute, Prof. Popov, 2; St. Petersburg, RF-197376, Russia E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Sciences and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Ha Noi, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 3Quang Tri Center of Science and Technology, Mientrung Institute for Scientific Research, 121 Ly Thuong Kiet, Dong Ha, Quang Tri, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 4 3/12/3 Vo Van Kiet Street, Buon Ma Thuot City, Dak Lak province, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Pharmacognosy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, 15 Le Thanh Tong, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi, Vietnam E-mail: [email protected] 6Viet Nam Post and Telecommunications Group – VNPT, Lam Dong 8 Tran Phu Street, Da Lat City, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 7Wildlife At Risk, 202/10 Nguyen Xi st., ward 26, Binh Thanh, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 8Center for Plant Conservation, no. 25/32, lane 191, Lac Long Quan, Nghia Do, Cau Giay District, Ha Noi, Vietnam E-mail: [email protected] 9Herbarium, Singapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 259569.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Provincial Context in Oudomxay 1
    RESIREA – Study of Oudomxay provincial context Study of the provincial context in Oudomxay 1 – Geography and demography Oudomxay province is a province in the north of Laos, covering an area of 15,370 km2 about 85% of which is mountainous. Oudomxay is divided in 7 districts, with totally 584 villages, 42 419 families which means 263 000 people. The villages are relatively small and mainly concentrated along the roads. The population density is quite low (17 people per km2). The exact localization of the villages was quite difficult, and has been done by crossing different sources of information. The province borders China and Phongsaly province to the north, Luang Namtha and Bokeo province to the west, Xayaboury province to the south and Luang Prabang to the east. Although Oudomxay has only a short international border with China, it is a transit point between China, Vietnam and Thailand, with a large flow of products. Yet, only 66% of the households have a road access in comparison to the northern regional average of 75% and national average of 83%. 14 ethnic groups are present in the province, 85% are Khmu (who are generally included in Lao Theung ethnic group) and Lao Loum are in minority. MEM Lao PDR RESIREA – Study of Oudomxay provincial context 2- Agriculture and local development The main agricultural crop practiced in Oudomxay provinces is corn, especially located in Houn district. Oudomxay is the second province in terms of corn production: 84 900 tons in 2006, for an area of 20 935 ha. These figures have increased a lot within the last few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Laos Under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy
    <Articles>Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Title Laos under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy Author(s) FUJITA, Koichi; Ohno, Akihiko; Chansathith, Chaleunsinh Citation Southeast Asian Studies (2015), 3(4): 39-71 Issue Date 2015-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/199240 Right ©Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Laos under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy Fujita Koichi,* Ohno Akihiko,** and Chansathith Chaleunsinh*** The shifting cultivation stabilization policy after the mid-1990s in northern Laos had a fundamental impact on rural lives, including an accelerated migration of non-Lao ethnic people. Based on household-level detailed data collected in 2010–11 from eight villages in Luang Prabang Province, we analyze first the differential impacts of such a policy on different types of villages in terms of location (access to urban centers), land endowments, ethnic composition, etc. Then we examine the role and limitations of village-level savings groups (SGs) introduced by an NGO (supported by the Lao Women’s Union) from the middle of the first decade of the twenty-first century. It is found that most of the SGs faced difficulties in accumulating savings, which resulted in a shortage of funds that could be credited to needy members. Money borrowed from SGs is used mainly for medical treatment and consumption. It is suggested that income stabilization and diversification is one
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross Sectional Study 80 Pertussis in Lao PDR: Seroprevalence and Disease
    Summary 01 Letter from Dr. Paul BREY 06 Arbovirus and Emerging viral diseases laboratory Lao-French joint Lab 1 08 Arbovirus surveillance in Lao PDR 10 Ecomore2 project 11 Inputs of Research and development activities in Ecomore2 project 14 COVID19 activities 15 Training activities 16 Education activities (Elodie Calvez) 16 Evaluation of new diagnostic tools for Chikungunya virus 17 Medical Entomology & Biology of Disease Vectors Laboratory Lao-French joint Lab 2 20 Tick Map 3 project: Mapping of Vectors and Reservoir Hosts in Lao PDR 27 Origins, natural reservoirs and Interspecies transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other SARS-like CoVs 31 ECOnomic Development, ECOsystem Modifications, and Emerging Infectious Diseases Risk Evaluation (ECOMORE II). Entomology work package. 39 Assessing the risk of insecticide resistance in the tiger mosquito: A predictive approach combining experimental selection and molecular markers (TigeRisk) 41 Entomological field surveys in selected high-risk dengue transmission areas in Vientiane. (Baseline survey) 45 Vaccine Preventable Diseases Laboratory Lao-Lux Lab 52 Hepatitis B virus in Lao Blood donors: a nationwide serostudyviruses 69 Hepatitis B virus in Lao dentists: a cross-sectional serological study 63 Positive impact of HBV vaccination in Lao PDR 71 Timeliness of immunisation with Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis whole cell– Hepatitis B–Haemophilus influenzae Type B at different levels of the health care system in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: a cross sectional study 80 Pertussis in Lao PDR: Seroprevalence
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th FIVE-YEAR NATIONAL SOCIO- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
    Lao People’s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Unity Prosperity 8th FIVE-YEAR NATIONAL SOCIO- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2016–2020) (Officially approved at the VIIIth National Assembly’s Inaugural Session, 20–23 April 2016, Vientiane) Ministry of Planning and Investment June 2016 8th FIVE-YEAR NATIONAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2016–2020) (Officially approved at the VIIIth National Assembly’s Inaugural Session, 20–23 April 2016, Vientiane) Ministry of Planning and Investment June 2016 FOREWORD The 8th Five-Year National Socio-economic Development Plan (2016–2020) “8th NSEDP” is a mean to implement the resolutions of the 10th Party Conference that also emphasizes the areas from the previous plan implementation that still need to be achieved. The Plan also reflects the Socio-economic Development Strategy until 2025 and Vision 2030 with an aim to build a new foundation for graduating from LDC status by 2020 to become an upper-middle-income country by 2030. Therefore, the 8th NSEDP is an important tool central to the assurance of the national defence and development of the party’s new directions. Furthermore, the 8th NSEDP is a result of the Government’s breakthrough in mindset. It is an outcome- based plan that resulted from close research and, thus, it is constructed with the clear development outcomes and outputs corresponding to the sector and provincial development plans that should be able to ensure harmonization in the Plan performance within provided sources of funding, including a government budget, grants and loans,
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Laos Under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy Author(S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository <Articles>Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Title Laos under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy Author(s) FUJITA, Koichi; Ohno, Akihiko; Chansathith, Chaleunsinh Citation Southeast Asian Studies (2015), 3(4): 39-71 Issue Date 2015-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/199240 Right ©Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Laos under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy Fujita Koichi,* Ohno Akihiko,** and Chansathith Chaleunsinh*** The shifting cultivation stabilization policy after the mid-1990s in northern Laos had a fundamental impact on rural lives, including an accelerated migration of non-Lao ethnic people. Based on household-level detailed data collected in 2010–11 from eight villages in Luang Prabang Province, we analyze first the differential impacts of such a policy on different types of villages in terms of location (access to urban centers), land endowments, ethnic composition, etc. Then we examine the role and limitations of village-level savings groups (SGs) introduced by an NGO (supported by the Lao Women’s Union) from the middle of the first decade of the twenty-first century. It is found that most of the SGs faced difficulties in accumulating savings, which resulted in a shortage of funds that could be credited to needy members. Money borrowed from SGs is used mainly for medical treatment and consumption. It is suggested that income stabilization and diversification is one of the key factors that facilitate villagers’ participation in SGs.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Rural Infrastructure Development Sector Project – Additional Financing
    Environmental and Social Monitoring Report 5th Semi-Annual Environmental and Social Monitoring Report January - June 2020 December 2020 Lao PDR: Northern Rural Infrastructure Development Sector Project – Additional Financing Prepared by the National Project Management Office of Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the Government of Lao PDR and the Asian Development Bank. 1 NOTE (i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental and social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. 2 GRANT No. 0534-LAO LAO PDR Safeguards Monitoring Report 5th Semi-Annual Safeguards Monitoring Report January – June 2020 Lao Peoples Democratic Republic: Northern Rural Infrastructure Development Sector Project Additional Financing Prepared by the National Project Management Office (NPMO)/ Grant Implementation Consultants (GIC), Department of Planning and Finance, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the Government of Lao PDR and the Asian Development Bank. NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This safeguards monitoring report is a document of the grant recipient. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • BANANA PLANTATION.Indd
    This project is funded by the European Union LABOUR RIGHTS, CHILD RIGHTS AND GENDER JUSTICE FOR LAO WORKERS IN CHINESE BANANA PLANTATIONS IN BOKEO A Research Study contribuƟ ng to the Project enƟ tled Strengthening civil society to protect and promote social, economic and cultural rights of ethnic communiƟ es in Bokeo province Funded by European Union (EU) Stuart Ling and Mai Yer Xiong Independent Consultants LABOUR RIGHTS, CHILD RIGHTS AND GENDER JUSTICE FOR LAO WORKERS IN CHINESE BANANA PLANTATIONS IN BOKEO A Research Study contribuƟ ng to the Project enƟ tled Strengthening civil society to protect and promote social, economic and cultural rights of ethnic communiƟ es in Bokeo province Funded by European Union (EU) Stuart Ling and Mai Yer Xiong Independent Consultants January 2017 CONTENTS Page List of Figures 1 List of Tables 1 Acronyms 2 Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Background to this research 6 1.2 Classifi cation of plantation workers employed by Chinese companies 7 1.3 Review of labour rights issues in Lao PDR 9 1.4 Review of child rights and gender justice issues in Lao PDR 12 1.5 Research Questions 16 1.6 Structure of this report 17 Chapter 2. Methodology 18 2.1 Guiding assumptions 18 2.2 Researcher positioning 18 2.3 Research Design 18 2.4 Sampling procedures 22 2.5 Data Analysis 25 2.6 Feedback process and refi nement of conclusions and recommendations 25 Chapter 3. Results and Discussion 26 3.1 Demography of plantation workers living in camps 26 3.2 Realisation of labour rights under the Lao laws 27 3.3 Use of agrochemicals 34 3.4 Gender rights issues 39 3.5 Realisation of child rights 41 3.6 Household hopes for the future 48 3.7 Role of government and civil society in ensuring labour rights, child rights and gender justice 52 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Laos Under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy
    Performance of Savings Groups in Mountainous Laos under Shifting Cultivation Stabilization Policy Fujita Koichi,* Ohno Akihiko,** and Chansathith Chaleunsinh*** The shifting cultivation stabilization policy after the mid-1990s in northern Laos had a fundamental impact on rural lives, including an accelerated migration of non-Lao ethnic people. Based on household-level detailed data collected in 2010–11 from eight villages in Luang Prabang Province, we analyze first the differential impacts of such a policy on different types of villages in terms of location (access to urban centers), land endowments, ethnic composition, etc. Then we examine the role and limitations of village-level savings groups (SGs) introduced by an NGO (supported by the Lao Women’s Union) from the middle of the first decade of the twenty-first century. It is found that most of the SGs faced difficulties in accumulating savings, which resulted in a shortage of funds that could be credited to needy members. Money borrowed from SGs is used mainly for medical treatment and consumption. It is suggested that income stabilization and diversification is one of the key factors that facilitate villagers’ participation in SGs. Keywords: Laos, savings group, shifting cultivation stabilization policy, emergency I Introduction In the late 1990s, village savings and credit groups (hereafter savings groups, or SGs) were introduced from Northeast Thailand to Laos by NGOs—Foundation for Integrated Agricultural and Environmental Management and Community Organizations Develop- ment Institute of Thailand—with the cooperation of the Lao Women’s Union (LWU), first to villages in Vientiane Municipality and later to hinterland areas where the market economy was less developed (see Ohno and Fujita, special issue introduction paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collection Survey on Education Environment of Lower Secondary Schools in Lao P.D.R
    Final Report: Data Collection Survey on Education Environment of Lower Secondary Schools in Lao P.D.R February, 2016 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Mohri, Architect and Associates, Inc. 1R JR 16-04 Final Report: Data Collection Survey on Education Environment of Lower Secondary Schools in Lao P.D.R February, 2016 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Mohri, Architect and Associates, Inc. Contents Chapter 1 SUMMARY OF STUDY ............................................................................................. 1-1 1-1 Context of Study .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1-2 Objective of Study ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1-3 Timeframe of Study ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1-4 Members of Study Mission （Name, Responsibility, Organization belonging to） ...... 1-2 1-5 Concerned persons consulted and/or interviewed ......................................................... 1-2 1-6 Contents of Study .......................................................................................................... 1-2 1-6-1 Local Study I ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1-6-2 Local Study II ........................................................................................................... 1-3 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Strengthening for Poverty Monitoring and Evaluation
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 35473 2008 Lao PDR: Institutional Strengthening for Poverty Monitoring and Evaluation {(Financed by the <source of funding>)} Prepared by {author(s)} {Firm name} {City, country} For {Executing agency} {Implementing agency} This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. Participatory Poverty Assessment (2006) Lao People’s Democratic Republic National Statistics Center Asian Development Bank James R. Chamberlain ADB TA 4521 Institutional Strengthening for Poverty Monitoring and Evaluation 2006-2007 Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report National Statistics Center All Rights Reserved This report was prepared by consultants based on results of the technical assistance project Institutional Strengthening for Poverty Monitoring and Evaluation funded by the Asian Development Bank. 3 Figure 1 - Map of the Lao PDR 4 Table of Contents FOREWORD..............................................................................................................................................8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS......................................................................................................................9 ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]