DOCSLIB.ORG

Player Profile Models a Research in the Phenomena Player Types

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Player Profile Models a Research in the Phenomena Player Types Player Profile Models A Research in the Phenomena Player Types AAU-CPH Jonatan Rueløkke 27/05/2014 Table of Contents 1 Motivation ............................................................................................................................... 7 2 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 8 3 Pre-analysis .......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Research Approach ....................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Player Types .................................................................................................................. 11 3.2.1 Richard A. Bartle ...................................................................................................... 11 3.2.2 Andrzej Marczewski ................................................................................................. 13 3.2.3 Nick Yee .................................................................................................................. 14 3.2.4 Jesse Shell and Christopher G. Klug ....................................................................... 15 3.2.5 Summary ................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Continuation Desire........................................................................................................ 16 3.3.1 Flow ......................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.2 Continuation Desire ................................................................................................. 17 3.4 Summary........................................................................................................................ 19 4 Final Problem Statement ...................................................................................................... 19 5 Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 20 5.1 Model Parameters .......................................................................................................... 20 5.1.1 Finding the Categories - Researchers and Own Additions ....................................... 21 5.1.2 Finding the Categories - Focus Groups ................................................................... 23 5.1.3 Description of parameters ........................................................................................ 25 5.2 Model Chart ................................................................................................................... 30 5.2.1 Bar Chart ................................................................................................................. 31 5.2.2 Circle Chart .............................................................................................................. 31 5.2.3 Radar Chart ............................................................................................................. 31 5.3 Adding values ................................................................................................................ 32 5.4 Design of the experiment ............................................................................................... 34 5.5 Product Requirements ................................................................................................... 35 6 Method ................................................................................................................................. 36 7 Design .................................................................................................................................. 37 7.1 General Design Choices ................................................................................................ 37 7.1.1 Game Genre ............................................................................................................ 37 7.1.2 Audiovisual Strategy ................................................................................................ 39 Page 2 of 75 7.1.3 Parameter assigning strategy .................................................................................. 39 7.1.4 Design of games ...................................................................................................... 40 7.1.5 Summary ................................................................................................................. 43 7.2 Technical System Design ............................................................................................... 44 7.2.1 Instantiation ............................................................................................................. 44 7.2.2 Player Control .......................................................................................................... 45 7.2.3 Mob Behavior .......................................................................................................... 46 7.2.4 Day and Night Cycle (Extra Feature) ....................................................................... 47 7.2.5 Individual Game Class ............................................................................................. 48 7.2.6 Technical System Design Summary ........................................................................ 48 8 Implementation ..................................................................................................................... 49 8.1 Game Master ................................................................................................................. 50 8.2 Player Character and Vital Bars ..................................................................................... 51 8.3 Player Input .................................................................................................................... 53 8.4 Movement, FSM ............................................................................................................. 53 8.5 Mob AI ........................................................................................................................... 55 8.6 Summary........................................................................................................................ 55 9 Test ...................................................................................................................................... 55 9.1 Method ........................................................................................................................... 56 9.2 Procedure ...................................................................................................................... 57 9.3 Results ........................................................................................................................... 61 9.3.1 Preliminary Test ....................................................................................................... 61 9.3.2 Final Test ................................................................................................................. 63 9.4 Summary........................................................................................................................ 64 10 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 64 11 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 67 12 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 68 13 Appendix ............................................................................................................................ 70 13.1 Table Summarizing Player Types ................................................................................ 70 13.2 Focus Group Notes ...................................................................................................... 71 13.4 Explaining The Player Profile Model Parameters ......................................................... 74 Page 3 of 75 Illustrations Illustration 1: Bartle's Player Type Model ................................................................................. 11 Illustration 2: Bartle's Advanced Player Type Model ................................................................ 12 Illustration 3: Marczewski's Player Type Model ....................................................................... 13 Illustration 4: Mental State in terms of challenge level and skill level ....................................... 16 Illustration 5: The OA3 framework ........................................................................................... 17 Illustration 6: Bostan’s Motivational Study Comparison ........................................................... 22 Illustration 7: Prototype Model without Role Playing parameter ............................................... 23 Illustration 8: Finished Player Profile Model ............................................................................. 25 Illustration 9: Bar Chart Example ............................................................................................. 31 Illustration 10: Circle Chart Example ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Third Age of Avatars Bruce Damer, [email protected] Damer.Com | Digitalspace.Com | Ccon.Org | Biota.Org | Digibarn.Com
    A Third Age of Avatars Bruce Damer, [email protected] damer.com | digitalspace.com | ccon.org | biota.org | digibarn.com Ò Started life on a PDP-11 fresh out of high school (1980), programmed graphics, videotext systems, dreamed of self replicating robots on the moon, designed board games, built model space stations. Ò Worked at IBM Research in 1984 (Toronto, New York), introduced to Internet, optical computing. Ò At Elixir Technologies 1987-94, wrote some of first GUI/Windows-Icons Publishing software on the IBM PC platform used 100 countries. Ò Established Contact Consortium in 1995, held first conferences on avatars (Earth to Avatars, Oct 1996) Ò Wrote “Avatars!”in 1997. Hosted and supported 9 conferences until 2003 on various aspects of virtual worlds (AVATARS Conferences, VLearn3D, Digital Biota) Ò Founded DigitalSpace in 1995, produced 3D worlds for government, corporate, university, and industry. Evangelism for Adobe (Atmosphere), NASA (Digital Spaces, open source 3D worlds for design simulation of space exploration) and NIH (learning games for Autism) Ò Established DigibarnComputer Museum (2002) Ò Virtual Worlds Timeline project (2006-2008) to capture and represent the history of the medium Ò The Virtual World, its Origins in Deep Time Ò Text Worlds Ò Graphical Worlds Ò Internet-Connected Worlds Ò The Avatars Cyberconferences Ò Massive Multiplayer Online RPGs Ò Virtual World Platforms Ò Virtual Worlds Timeline Project and Other Research History of Virtual Worlds The Virtual World, its Origins in Deep Time So what is a Virtual World? A place described by words or projected through pictures which creates a space in the imagination real enough that you can feel you are inside of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber-Synchronicity: the Concurrence of the Virtual
    Cyber-Synchronicity: The Concurrence of the Virtual and the Material via Text-Based Virtual Reality A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeffrey S. Smith March 2010 © 2010 Jeffrey S. Smith. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Cyber-Synchronicity: The Concurrence of the Virtual and the Material Via Text-Based Virtual Reality by JEFFREY S. SMITH has been approved for the School of Media Arts and Studies and the Scripps College of Communication by Joseph W. Slade III Professor of Media Arts and Studies Gregory J. Shepherd Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii ABSTRACT SMITH, JEFFREY S., Ph.D., March 2010, Mass Communication Cyber-Synchronicity: The Concurrence of the Virtual and the Material Via Text-Based Virtual Reality (384 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Joseph W. Slade III This dissertation investigates the experiences of participants in a text-based virtual reality known as a Multi-User Domain, or MUD. Through in-depth electronic interviews, staff members and players of Aurealan Realms MUD were queried regarding the impact of their participation in the MUD on their perceived sense of self, community, and culture. Second, the interviews were subjected to a qualitative thematic analysis through which the nature of the participant’s phenomenological lived experience is explored with a specific eye toward any significant over or interconnection between each participant’s virtual and material experiences. An extended analysis of the experiences of respondents, combined with supporting material from other academic investigators, provides a map with which to chart the synchronous and synonymous relationship between a participant’s perceived sense of material identity, community, and culture, and her perceived sense of virtual identity, community, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Collection Interfaces for Digital Game Objects
    “The Collecting Itself Feels Good”: Towards Collection Interfaces for Digital Game Objects Zachary O. Toups,1 Nicole K. Crenshaw,2 Rina R. Wehbe,3 Gustavo F. Tondello,3 Lennart E. Nacke3 1Play & Interactive Experiences for Learning Lab, Dept. Computer Science, New Mexico State University 2Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine 3HCI Games Group, Games Institute, University of Waterloo [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Figure 1. Sample favorite digital game objects collected by respondents, one for each code from the developed coding manual (except MISCELLANEOUS). While we did not collect media from participants, we identified representative images0 for some responses. From left to right: CHARACTER: characters from Suikoden II [G14], collected by P153; CRITTER: P32 reports collecting Arnabus the Fairy Rabbit from Dota 2 [G19]; GEAR: P55 favorited the Gjallerhorn rocket launcher from Destiny [G10]; INFORMATION: P44 reports Dragon Age: Inquisition [G5] codex cards; SKIN: P66’s favorite object is the Cauldron of Xahryx skin for Dota 2 [G19]; VEHICLE: a Jansen Carbon X12 car from Burnout Paradise [G11] from P53; RARE: a Hearthstone [G8] gold card from the Druid deck [P23]; COLLECTIBLE: World of Warcraft [G6] mount collection interface [P7, P65, P80, P105, P164, P185, P206]. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Digital games offer a variety of collectible objects. We inves- People collect objects for many reasons, such as filling a per- tigate players’ collecting behaviors in digital games to deter- sonal void, striving for a sense of completion, or creating a mine what digital game objects players enjoyed collecting and sense of order [8,22,29,34].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: the Semiotic Conditions of Videogame Authorship
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Foundations of Videogame Authorship Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96x08750 Author Huber, William Humberto Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Foundations of Videogame Authorship A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Art History, Theory and Criticism by William Humberto Huber Committee in charge: Professor Lev Manovich, Chair Professor Grant Kester Professor Kuiyi Shen Professor Stefan Tanaka Professor Noah Wardrip-Fruin 2013 © William Humberto Huber, 2013 All rights reserved. SIGNATURE PAGE The Dissertation of William Humberto Huber is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2013 iii DEDICATION With gratitude to friends, family and colleagues. To Samantha, with deepest devotion, for her friendship, affection and patience. To Rafael, for whom play is everything. iv EPIGRAPH Art is a game between all people, of all periods. – Marcel Duchamp v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ............................................................................................................... iii Dedication ..................................................................................................................... iv Epigraph ..........................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Mud Connector
    Archive-name: mudlist.doc /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ /_/_/_/_/ THE /_/_/_/_/ /_/_/ MUD CONNECTOR /_/_/ /_/_/_/_/ MUD LIST /_/_/_/_/ /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ o=======================================================================o The Mud Connector is (c) copyright (1994 - 96) by Andrew Cowan, an associate of GlobalMedia Design Inc. This mudlist may be reprinted as long as 1) it appears in its entirety, you may not strip out bits and pieces 2) the entire header appears with the list intact. Many thanks go out to the mud administrators who helped to make this list possible, without them there is little chance this list would exist! o=======================================================================o This list is presented strictly in alphabetical order. Each mud listing contains: The mud name, The code base used, the telnet address of the mud (unless circumstances prevent this), the homepage url (if a homepage exists) and a description submitted by a member of the mud's administration or a person approved to make the submission. All listings derived from the Mud Connector WWW site http://www.mudconnect.com/ You can contact the Mud Connector staff at [email protected]. [NOTE: This list was computer-generated, Please report bugs/typos] o=======================================================================o Last Updated: June 8th, 1997 TOTAL MUDS LISTED: 808 o=======================================================================o o=======================================================================o Muds Beginning With: A o=======================================================================o Mud : Aacena: The Fatal Promise Code Base : Envy 2.0 Telnet : mud.usacomputers.com 6969 [204.215.32.27] WWW : None Description : Aacena: The Fatal Promise: Come here if you like: Clan Wars, PKilling, Role Playing, Friendly but Fair Imms, in depth quests, Colour, Multiclassing*, Original Areas*, Tweaked up code, and MORE! *On the way in The Fatal Promise is a small mud but is growing in size and player base.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Design and Role-Playing Games
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Role- Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations on April 4, 2018, available online: https://www.routledge.com/Role-Playing-Game-Studies-Transmedia-Foundations/Deterding-Zagal/p/book/9781138638907 Please cite as: Björk, Staffan and Zagal, José P. (2018). “Game Design and Role- Playing Games” In Zagal, José P. and Deterding, S. (eds.), Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations. New York: Routledge, 323-336. 18 Game Design and Role-Playing Games Staffan Björk; José Zagal This chapter explores role-playing games (RPGs) from a design perspective. While there are many approaches to acquiring knowledge about RPGs, designers of RPGs often consider the structural elements of a game—its rules and the entities on which the rules act—and how they will interact with each other. One complication of game design, and RPG design specifically, is that “games” involve and describe both the artifacts that makes playing possible – the things we buy in stores – and the gameplay artifacts enable and encourage. While game designers can exert control over the artifact (e.g. a rulebook or software), their ultimate goal is to encourage a certain kind of gameplay. Thus, gameplay, which primarily depends on the player’s behavior, is out of their direct control. Salen and Zimmerman (2004) refer to this as “second-order design” and stress the importance of playtesting to see if the game artifacts generate the desired game activities when used by the intended target group. However, they also stress the importance of game designers having a structural understanding of games as systems so they can anticipate how specific design configurations will work.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Leave Those Orcs Alone: Property Rights in Virtual Worlds by Kevin
    Leave Those Orcs Alone: Property Rights in Virtual Worlds By Kevin Deenihan1 [email protected] I. Summary Over the past decade new societies built by millions of people have sprung up in the online world. Their inhabitants buy goods, trade with each other, and form complex self-regulating organizations and economic systems. Many of the academics who observed these new societies argued for treating their virtual acquisitions and disputes as subject to a real world legal system. However, the companies who create and run these worlds have already evolved a sophisticated quasi-legal system through the use of the End-User License Agreement and informal mechanisms of negotiation. In addition, the role that virtual property plays in an online world differs substantially from the role of real world property. Players and their characters earn virtual property to socialize, for fun, or for status, not for protection or investment. Shoehorning in a legal system that protects investment and ignores the value of fun and communality would do terrible violence to these societies. Far better utility results from allowing users and developers to continue elaborating on their quasi-legal systems in peace. II. Virtual Worlds and the Property Problem Virtual Worlds have gradually evolved from technical advances in networking technology to full- fledged replications of the works of JRR Tolkien and games like Dungeons and Dragons.1 In the late 1970s, innovators in computer technology made possible shared virtual spaces, where more then one player could interact with the online world and with each other.2 Eventually, programmers took the next step from text-only spaces to the development of an “avatar,” a graphical icon under their control.3 As 1 I am indebted to my advisor, Professor Stout, my wife Lia, Professor Bartle, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Worlds: Why People Play Introduction
    Virtual Worlds: Why People Play Richard Bartle –University of Essex [email protected] Ask people why they play virtual worlds, and their response is likely to be some variant of “to have fun”. This is pretty well the bottom line for players, but it’s not detailed enough to be of much use to designers. What do they find fun? Why do they find it fun? How does their idea of what is fun change over time? What can designers do to make them have more fun? And what happens when they stop having fun? Introduction The hypothesis outlined here asserts that virtual worlds are about the celebration of identity . It stems from the observation that different players find different kinds of thing “fun”, and, furthermore, that their idea of what constitutes “fun” changes along predictable lines as they play. The hypothesis also suggests that there is an age-old precedent for this. Player Types The original player types model [Bartle96] divides players into four categories, using two axes that express a player’s degree of preference for acting on or interacting with the virtual world itself or its (other) players. Figure 1 illustrates this as a graph. Acting Killers Achievers Players World Socializers Explorers Interacting Figure 1. The original player types graph. This gives four broad types of players: • Achievers like acting on the world. They are typically gamers, playing to “win”. • Explorers like interacting with the world. They delight in discovery. Writing for MMP Game Development 1 • Socializers like interacting with other players. They spend a lot of their time chatting.
    [Show full text]
  • Everquest: an Equation for Addiction
    Everquest: An Equation for Addiction Whalen Rozelle 3/18/02 Lowood An Equation for Addiction Wolfwalker pulls himself over the sand dune. A halfling in the middle of the Oasis of Marr, he is busy honing his druidic skills by hunting down a group of orcs that have been terrorizing traveling merchants and gypsies in the area. Spotting an orc priest, he casts a spell that commands local flora to ensnare the surprised orc. After Wolfwalker proceeds to pummel it with fire spells, the orc falls dead. He rifles through its pack and finds five silver coins, the spoils of combat. In a dark room, I chuckle to myself, and type in the commands to make Wolfwalker, my avatar on Everquest, sit down and recover from the fight. Glancing at the clock, I notice that it is five in the morning. School starts in a mere three hours. Pausing to consider this, I shrug and turn back to my computer— the only source of light in an otherwise pitch-black house. “Just kill one more orc,” I mutter to myself, and realize that I won’t be getting any sleep. Again. This night – and early morning -- exemplifies the experiences of many gamers that have played Everquest. A massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG), Everquest continues to dominate its genre. The game hosts a subscriber base of over 400,000, even after three years and even though competitors have released a number of newer game releases since Everquest’s initial launch date. Through looking at Everquest’s history and design, I will delve into the question of why Everquest has been able to capture and hold a large fraction of the online-gaming market, and what techniques its designer used to develop such and fun, addictive game.
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds at Play Space and Player Experience in Fantasy Computer Games
    10.2478/nor-2014-0115 Nordicom Review 35 (2014) Special Issue, pp. 237-249 Worlds at Play Space and Player Experience in Fantasy Computer Games Claus Toft-Nielsen Abstract The relationship between the fantasy genre and the medium of computer games has always been a very tight-knit one. The present article explores the close connection between fan- tasy and computer games through different media, arguing that the fantasy genre’s specific ‘mode of function’ is the ability to build complete fictional worlds, whereby it creates spe- cific experiences for its users. Based on empirical data from focus group interviews with players of the most popular Western Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game (MMORPG) of all times, World of Warcraft, the article develops the concept of worldness as an experiential, phenomenological understanding of player experience. I discuss how this way of framing a core quality of the fantasy genre (of world-building) functions across single fictional universes and aims to grasp a specific fantasy experience of being in the world. This experience works on the level of genre, by anchoring the specific fantasy world in the larger, surrounding fantasy genre matrix. Keywords: fantasy genre, MMORPG, world-building, worldness, player experience Introduction World of Warcraft (WoW) is the largest Western MMORPG and has been for almost a decade, with a current player base of 8 million. The game belongs to a type of games primarily defined by its persistent game world: These games are virtual meeting places where thousands of players interact with each other as they “assume the roles of heroic fantasy characters and explore a virtual world full of mystery, magic, and endless ad- venture” (Blizzard 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • GAME DEVELOPMENT ESSENTIALS an Introduction (2Nd Edition) Jeannie Novak Know These Concepts: 1. Phases in the History of The
    GAME DEVELOPMENT ESSENTIALS An Introduction (2nd Edition) Jeannie Novak MIDTERM REVIEW Know these concepts: 1. Phases in the history of the electronic game industry 2. Different types of game platforms 3. Significance of US vs overseas game market 4. Features of specific game genres (know your acronyms – MMOG, RPG, RTS, FPS) 5. Significance of Bartle’s “players that suit MUDs” (spades, clubs, hearts, diamonds) 6. Different types of game player modes 7. Different types of game time intervals 8. Motivating factors in playing games (also – think of what motivates you to play) 9. Game goals and applications other than pure entertainment 10. Strategies and challenges used in games (also – think of what challenges appeal to you) 11. Difference between games and other forms of entertainment (such as film) 12. “Non-linear” storytelling in film 13. Difference between casual and hardcore game markets 14. Features of character types and archetypes (including generational) and how they are applied to games 15. Features of game story and character development 16. Significance of 1st vs 3rd-person point-of-view 17. Interactivity modes 18. Zero sum vs non zero sum games 19. Static vs dynamic balance 20. Relating challenges to game goals/objectives 21. Plot techniques and how they’re applied to games 22. Elements of character triangles and arcs 23. Forms of character development 24. Elements of a character description Know these terms: 1. genre 9. extrinsic knowledge 2. platform 10. perfect information 3. high concept/premise 11. imperfect information 4. backstory 12. transitive relationship 5. synopsis (linear/hierarchical) 6. victory conditions 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Worlds Influences II
    Medium Specificity/ Autonomy. Minimalism/Donald Judd Reduced the theatrical/dramatic essence of an Robert Morris II avatar's presence to a single gesture. Sculptural autonomy Created "An Essay on Robert Morris I = stereo-metric Harmony" (1739) - English influenced sculptural forms Minimalism Neo-Classicism Edmund Burke's Architecture with a Pierre Etienne essay on the sublime singular Boulee Sublime (1757) presence. - French - English Direct Art-Historical Influences Structural Aesthetic related to thesis Formalism/Clement Limitations... research Greenberg Parameter rule-list Creating infinite Serialism (Music)/ avatar design Arnold variety though the Schoenberg/Anton restriction of Webern, Pierre element repetition Boulez etc etc Neo-Platonic De Stijl/ outlines of avatar Piet Mondrian/ form Theo Van Doesberg Architecture as a Japanese Architecture as community of Metabolist hive-mind avatar organic modular Architecture "units" Avatar as Template Explored Vedic Self (Humanoid/ Anthropomorphic) concepts in a Avatar Self as qualitative manner "Kalki" Jeremy Turner aestheticized as an embedded "SLebrity" (AvaStar interviewer. Magazine) Avatar accessories peripherals as extension of virtual Poetics of formal AVATARA in-world self (e.g. cars, Phillip Rosedale/ Avatar Open Source Avatar clothing) design/ Donato Mancini documentary Second Life Linden Labs customizability Identity Machinima "Dead on Second Edited the Life" by Patrick "Flick" Friendly AI research documentation Avatar as xDxD.vs.xDxD - Harrison - Singularity Agent/Bot/AI. http://www.artisope process. Institute nsource.net/dosl/ma in.html Religious/Spiritual/ Qyxxql Merlin Philosophical LIFESTYLE Avatar as embodied Avatar as Template (informal) ActiveWorlds Circle of Fire Inc. Auto-ethnographic Architecture self Corporate/ Newton Dinzeo Professional The essential/ Avatar "Body fundamental "Theatrical" Virtual Worlds There.com Jeffery Ventrella presentations Influences I - Language" properties of avatar SECOND LIFE Worlds expression.
    [Show full text]