DOCSLIB.ORG

Ohio Archaeologist Volume 33 Winter 1983

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ohio Archaeologist Volume 33 Winter 1983 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 33 WINTER 1983 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio Robert Harter, 1961 Buttermilk Hill, Delaware. Ohio EXPIRES OFFICERS Associate Editor, Martha P. Otto. 1984 President Mike Kish, 39 Parkview Ave., Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, Ohio Westerville. Ohio 43081 Jeff Carskadden, 960 Eastward Circle. Colony North. 1984 Immediate Past President Frank Otto. 2200 E Zanesville. Ohio 43701 Powell Rd., Westerville, Ohio 43081, All articles, reviews and comments on the Ohio Archae­ 1984 Vice President Don Gelbach, 3435 Sciotangy Dr., ologist should be sent to the Editor Memberships, re­ Columbus. Ohio 43221 quests for back issues, changes of address, and other 1984 Exec. Sect. Scott Haskins. 484 Stinchcomb Dr., matter should be sent to the business office Apt. 23, Columbus, Ohio 43202 PLEASE NOTIFY BUSINESS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY 1984 Treasurer Jim Perry, 2668 Blendon Woods Blvd. OF ADDRESS CHANGES. BY POSTAL REGULATIONS Columbus. Ohio 43229 SOCIETY MAIL CANNOT BE FORWARDED. 1984 flee. Seer Chris Olenick, 8140 Anne St. S.W.. Navarre. Ohio 44662 Editorial Office 1986 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., 199 Converse Drive, Plain City, Ohio 43064 Plain City, Ohio 43064 TRUSTEES 1984 Alva McGraw, 11 77 Eastern Ave., BUS. MANAGER Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 Joe Redick, 35 W. Riverglen Dr., Worthington, Ohio 43085 1984 Jan Sorgenfrei. Route 1, Pandora, Ohio 45877 1984 Ernest G. Good, 3402 Civic Place, Grove City, Ohio 43123 Membership and Dues 1984 Donald A Casto, 138 Ann Ct„ Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are Lancaster. Ohio 43130 payable on the first of January as follows: Regular 1986 Dana L Baker. 17240 Twp. Rd. 206, membership $12.00; Husband and wife (one copy of publication) $13.00; Contributing $25,00. Funds are used Mt. Victory, Ohio 43340 for publishing the Ohio Archaeologist. The Archaeological 1986 Steve Balazs, 1010 N. Mulberry St., Society of Ohio is an incorporated non-profit organization Mt. Vernon, Ohio 43050 and has no paid officers or employees. 1986 Douglas Hooks, 120 Yoha Dr.. The Ohio Archaeologist is published quarterly and Mansfield, Ohio 44907 subscription is included in the membership dues. 1986 Wayne Mortine, Scott Dr. Oxford Hts., Newcomerstown. Ohio 43832 Back Issues Regional Collaborators Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: David W Kuhn. 2642 Shawnee Rd , Portsmouth. Ohio Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N Converse $4 00 Charles H Stout. Sr , 91 Redbank Drive, Fairborn, Ohio Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N Converse 3 00 Mark W Long. Box 467, Wellston, Ohio Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N Converse 7,00 Steven Kelley. Seaman Ohio Back issues—black and white—each 3 00 William "hell 13435 Lake Ave , Lakewood, Ohio Back issues—four full color plates —each 3 00 Robert Jackman. Box 30. Wellsville, Ohio 43968 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior James L Murphy, 102 Wilbur Ave . to 1964 are generally out of print but copies are available Columbus, Ohio 43215 from time to time Write to business office (or prices and Gordon Hart, 760 N Main St , Bluffton, Indiana 46714 availability STANDING COMMITTEES SPECIAL COMMITTEES NOMINATING COMMITTEE PROGRAM COMMITTEE PRESERVATION COMMITTEE SOCIETY PHOTOGRAPHER Robert Converse, Chairman Martha Otto, Chairman Jeff Carskadden, Chairman Len Weidner Steve Fuller Mike Schoenfeld Richard Patterson FLOOR MANAGERS Jack Hooks John Winsch Jeff Brown COMMITTEE Wayne Mortine Bob Hill James Murphy Dana Baker Don Casto, Chairman MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE Joy Jones Edith Campbell AUDITING COMMITTEE Jane Weidner, Chairman SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Dave United Don Foster, Chairman Sharon Puttera COMMITTEE Robert White Craig Ciola Mike Wilson Robert Converse, Chairman Roy Stuart Mike Schoenfeld Ken Saunders Jeff Carskadden COMMITTEE TO STUDY EXHIBITS COMMITTEE Billy Hillen Martha Otto BUDGETING Don Casto, Co-Chairman Greg Shipley Scott Haskins Don Foster, Chairman Frank Otto, Co-Chairman Kim Ellis Wayne Mortine Jim Perry Billy Hillen Scott Haskins RAFFLE COMMITTEE Eugenia Kish Jim Hahn James Greenlee Chris Olenick, Chairman Jim Gooding Steve Olenick Jason Greenlee Dawn Wilson Warren Mears Jane Weidner FRAUDULENT ARTIFACTS Jim Perry (Joe Redick) Doug Hooks COMMITTEE Buddy Haney COMMITTEE TO REVIEW Scott Haskins Dana Baker, Co-Chairman EDUCATION AND PUBLICITY CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS Steve Puttera Steve Fuller, Co-Chairman COMMITTEE Robert Converse, Co-Chairman Doug Hooks LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Robert Hill, Chairman Don Gehlbach, Co-Chairman Don Bapst William King, Chairman Robert Converse Craig Ciola Tom Grubb William Tiell Ernie Good Jeff Fruth Jim Hahn Dan Rosette James Gooding Dorothy Good Virginia Morelock Paul Ford Martha Otto Lar Hothem Mark Seeley Editor's Page TABLE OF CONTENTS Our Society is suffering from growing pains. From what began as a small meet­ The Rutledge Mound, Licking County, Ohio 4 ing of no more than a handful of col­ lectors more than forty years ago, today An Analysis of Textile Fragments from Three Ohio Hopewell Sites 10 we have the largest state society in the United States. I'm sure that none of Ohio and Michigan Slate in the Olson Collection 16 those early organizers ever envisioned a Society of its present size. A Ceramic Tobacco Pipe Mold from Coshocton County, Ohio 17 The nucleous of the original Ohio Indian Relic Collectors Society were those who, for the most part, had the Prehistoric Indian Polissoirs 18 largest collections. Over the years, nearly all the large collections have Two Remarkable Surface Finds 22 been dispersed—the Meuser collection —the Kramer collection—the Copeland A Hopewell Copper Axe From the Cuyahoga Valley 24 collection—the Mayne collection—the Phillips collection—to name a few, and Trade Silver 26 it is doubtful whether their like will ever be seen again. The McFarland Rockshelter, Guernsey County, Ohio 28 If a cross-section could be taken to­ day of an average Society member we would find a combination of surface Reflections on the Distribution of Fluted Points in Ohio; Why we may hunter, student, collector, and those who look on interest in Indians as family not know what we think we know 32 togetherness. In the old days, the sur­ face hunter was either disdained or Three Hematite Finds 36 looked down on by the big collectors, but today he makes up the bulk of our An Iron Broadaxe 36 membership. Also in the old days, pro­ fessionals, by and large, were usually Two Hafted Scrapers—Additional Evidence of Paleo-lndian in avoided and in turn the professional avoided the collector—an attitude which Wood County, Ohio 37 was much to the detriment of archaeol­ Problems in Archaeology; Excavations at the Brokaw Village Site, ogy and unfortunately is an attitude which still prevails today in some places. Belmont County, Ohio 38 The present Archaeological Society of Ohio has grown to its present size Historic Rock Carving in Grafton, Ohio 40 from its policy of trying to encompass these widely separated interests. In Ohio Fluted Projectile Points: a preliminary functional analysis 42 other words, our diversity has made us successful. We have time and again at­ A Hopewell Mound, Dresden, Ohio 44 tempted to narrow the gap of the wide spectrum beginning at the novice sur­ Award-Winning Artifacts At The November 1982 ASO Meeting 48 face hunter and ending at the pure pro­ fessional. The narrower this gap be­ comes the more both will benefit. Artifacts in The Dan West Collection 50 In the past, for example, we have been criticized for both allowing buying and Policy Statement Relative to Gifts, Memorials, and Bequests 51 selling at our meetings and for not having enough dealers. We would gain nothing by eliminating dealers just as we would gain nothing by having too many of them. The dealer performs a vital function by way of putting artifacts into the hands of those who will study and publish them. also guide it in its proper direction and efforts to provide common ground for In fact, in many instances, he retrieves put it in its correct perspective. In addi­ all facets of archaeology. To this end, or salvages artifacts or collections from tion, we can afford both the buyer and everyone must be tolerant of the inter­ attics or trash piles which might other­ seller protections not afforded to him ests of those they don't strictly agree wise be lost forever. By allowing the elsewhere. with. buying and selling of artifacts at our If we are to continue to be a cohesive Robert N. Converse meetings we can not only control it but and vital Society we must persist in our Editor FRONT COVER BACK COVER Three fine examples of knobbed crescent An assortment of colored flint points from bannerstones. The upper two are from Indiana various Ohio counties. The majority are from and the bottom example is from Wisconsin. Medina. Huron and Lorain Counties. Most of From the collection of Earl Townsend, Jr., the flint is Flint Ridge flint. The largest blade Indianapolis, Indiana. is 3'A inches long. From the collection of Steve Fuller. Wadsworth, Ohio. The Rutledge Mound, Licking County, Ohio By James Morton and Jeff Carskadden Zanesville, Ohio The Edward Rutledge Mound is lo­ date was 260 B.C. ± 80 (1-12, 299). The of the ground, and in these beds of cated on top of a hill on the west side MASCA tree ring conversion for this charcoal were found six copper of Lot #13, Franklin Township, Licking date is 400 B.C. Considering that the bracelets. County, Ohio, about seven miles south­ artifacts from the mound, described and Burial Number one was that of an east of Newark and about one quarter illustrated below, are Hopewell, this adult female and was found lying mile east of Linnville Road. This mound date appears to be at least three or four on top of the south pile of stone was dug in the fall of 1930 by John and hundred years too early.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 1 03089500 Mill Creek Near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale C
    Table 2-1. Basin characteristics determined for selected streamgages in Ohio and adjacent States. [Characteristics listed in this table are described in detail in the text portion of appendix 2; column headings used in this table are shown in parentheses adjacent to the bolded long variable names] Station number Station name DASS Latc Longc SL10-85 LFPath SVI Agric Imperv OpenWater W 03089500 Mill Creek near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale Creek near Pricetown, Ohio 21.68 41.0908 81.0409 14.09 12.88 0.8076 40.46 1.08 0.48 2.31 03092090 West Branch Mahoning River near Ravenna, Ohio 21.81 41.2084 81.1983 20.23 11.19 0.5068 38.65 2.35 1.01 2.51 03102950 Pymatuning Creek at Kinsman, Ohio 96.62 41.4985 80.6401 5.46 21.10 0.6267 52.26 0.82 1.18 5.60 03109500 Little Beaver Creek near East Liverpool, Ohio 495.57 40.8103 80.6732 7.89 55.27 0.4812 38.05 1.98 0.79 1.41 03110000 Yellow Creek near Hammondsville, Ohio 147.22 40.5091 80.8855 9.37 33.62 0.5439 19.84 0.34 0.33 0.36 03111500 Short Creek near Dillonvale, Ohio 122.95 40.2454 80.8859 15.25 27.26 0.3795 30.19 1.08 0.93 1.16 03111548 Wheeling Creek below Blaine, Ohio 97.60 40.1274 80.9477 13.43 27.46 0.3280 40.92 0.97 0.56 0.64 03114000 Captina Creek at Armstrongs Mills, Ohio 133.69 39.9307 81.0696 13.56 26.99 0.6797 32.76 0.54 0.64 0.66 03115400 Little Muskingum River at Bloomfield, Ohio 209.94 39.6699 81.1370 5.50 44.84 0.7516 10.00 0.25 0.12 0.12 03115500 Little Muskingum River at Fay, Ohio 258.25 39.6406 81.1531 4.32 60.10 0.7834
    [Show full text]
  • 3745-1-22 AMENDMENT Rule Number TYPE of Rule Filing
    ACTION: Original DATE: 11/06/2007 8:08 AM Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Agency Name Division of Surface Water (DSW) Bob Heitzman Division Contact 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 PO Box 1049 614-644-2001 614-644-2745 Columbus OH 43216-1049 Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip) Phone Fax 3745-1-22 AMENDMENT Rule Number TYPE of rule filing Rule Title/Tag Line Chagrin river drainage basin. RULE SUMMARY 1. Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? Yes 2. Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No 3. Statute prescribing the procedure in 4. Statute(s) authorizing agency to accordance with the agency is required adopt the rule: 6111.041 to adopt the rule: 119.03 5. Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: 6111.041 6. State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule: To fulfill a federal requirement to review and amend water body use designations when new information is available. 7. If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE, then summarize the content of the rule: The rule amendments update beneficial use designations for water bodies in the Chagrin River drainage basin based on the latest scientific information the Agency [ stylesheet: rsfa.xsl 2.06, authoring tool: EZ1, p: 31078, pa: 39896, ra: 138590, d: 160526)] print date: 11/06/2007 09:14 PM Page 2 Rule Number: 3745-1-22 has gathered through water quality, biological, habitat, and other surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • FLOOD of AUGUST 1935 Dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER Z < 5
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 869 FLOOD OF AUGUST 1935 dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER o O z < 5 BY i ;> ^, C. V. YOUNGQUIST AND W. B. WITH SECTIONS ON THE ASSOCIATES METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOOT ^ ;j . » BY * V WALDO E. SMITH AND A. K. SHOWALTEK 2. Prepared in cooperation with the * ^* FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRAflCg^ OF PUBLIC WORKS ' -o j; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 jFor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. G. - * * « Price 40 cents (paper) CONTENTS Pag« Abstract---.--_-_-__-__-___--______.-__-_---_---_-__-_--_-__-.-_._ I Introduction.______________________________________________________ 1 Administration and personnel---_______--_-_____-__--____________-__ 3 Acknowledgments ________-________-----_--__--__-_________________ 3 Geography _ ____________________________________________________ 6 Topography, drainage, and transportation________________________ 6 Rainfall...--_---.-__-------.-_--------__..---_-----------_---- 7 Population, industry, and mineral resources_---_-__--_________--__ 8 Flood control-___-_-___-__-_-__-____-_--_-_-__--_--__.____--_- S General features of the flood-_______________________________________ 9 Damage.-__-_______--____-__--__--__-_-____--_______-____--__ IT Meteorologic and hydrologic conditions, by Waldo E. Smith____________ 19 General features of the storm.___-____-__________---_____--__--_ 19 Records of precipitation._______________________________________ 21 Antecedent
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint
    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Amanda Nicole Mullett December, 2009 Thesis written by Amanda Nicole Mullett B.A. Western State College, 2007 M.A. Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________, Advisor Dr. Mark F. Seeman _____________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Dr. Richard Meindl _____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi Chapter I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 II. Background ...................................................................................................................5 The Environment.............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 43 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 43 NO. 2 SPRING 1993 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first TERM of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in the member­ 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East ship dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incorporated non­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, Lancaster, OH 43130, (614)653-6642 BACK ISSUES 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43130,(614)653-9477 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE. East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse .$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614)861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064,(614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gener­ ally out of print but copies are available from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting
    PROGRAM OF THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY MEETING April 14−April 18, 2010 St. Louis, Missouri THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2010 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting 3 Contents 4............... Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5……….….2010 Award Recipients 10.................Maps of the America’s Center 12 ................Maps of Renaissance Grand St. Louis 14 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 15 .............. General Information 18. ............. Featured Sessions 20 .............. Summary Schedule 25 .............. A Word about the Sessions 27............... Program 161................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 167............... Presidents of SAA . 168............... Annual Meeting Sites 169............... Exhibit Map 170................Exhibitor Directory 180................SAA Committees and Task Forces 184………….Index of participants 4 Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting America’s Center APRIL 16, 2010 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2009 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Region X CEDS Update
    2020 Update Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Region X Bel-O-Mar Regional Council Wheeling, West Virginia Submitted to: U.S. Economic Development Administration Philadelphia, PA Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................................1 B. Council Organization ...........................................................................................................2 C. Jurisdiction and Boundaries .................................................................................................2 D. General Description of the Area ..........................................................................................5 1. History............................................................................................................................5 2. Geographic Location and Proximity to Markets ............................................................6 3. Natural Features .............................................................................................................7 II. Summary Background – The Economic Development Conditions of the Region .....................8 A. Population and Labor Force Characteristics ........................................................................8 1. Population ......................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the First Americas
    In Search of the First Americas Michael R. Waters Departments of Anthropology and Geography Center for the Study of the First Americans Texas A&M University Who were the first Americans? When did they arrive in the New World? Where did they come from? How did they travel to the Americas & settle the continent? A Brief History of Paleoamerican Archaeology Prior to 1927 People arrived late to the Americas ca. 6000 B.P. 1927 Folsom Site Discovery, New Mexico Geological Estimate in 1927 10,000 to 20,000 B.P. Today--12,000 cal yr B.P. Folsom Point Blackwater Draw (Clovis), New Mexico 1934 Clovis Discovery Folsom (Bison) Clovis (Mammoth) Ernst Antevs Geological estimate 13,000 to 14,000 B.P. Today 13,000 cal yr B.P. 1935-1990 Search continued for sites older than Clovis. Most sites did not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Calico Hills More Clovis sites were found across North America The Clovis First Model became entrenched. Pedra Furada Tule Springs Clovis First Model Clovis were the first people to enter the Americas -Originated from Northeast Asia -Entered the Americas by crossing the Bering Land Bridge and passing through the Ice Free Corridor around 13,600 cal yr B.P. (11,500 14C yr B.P.) -Clovis technology originated south of the Ice Sheets -Distinctive tools that are widespread -Within 800 years reached the southern tip of South America -Big game hunters that killed off the Megafauna Does this model still work? What is Clovis? • Culture • Era • Complex Clovis is an assemblage of distinctive tools that were made in a very prescribed way.
    [Show full text]
  • Teoc Creek a Poverty Point Site in Carroll County
    ... Archaeological Report No. 3 TEOC CREEK A Poverty Point Site .. in Carroll County, Mississippi by John M. Connaway Samuel o. McGahey Clarence H. Webb With Geological Analysis by Roger T. Saucier Edited by Priscilla M. Lowrey Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi Elbert R. Hilliard, Director 1977 - - - CONTENTS Page List of Illustrations v List of Tables vii Preface viii Acknowledgements ix 1. The Teoc Creek Site 1 .. 2. Explorations and Excavations 5 1966 Explorations 5 1969 Explorations 9 1970 Excavation 15 3. Artifacts and Raw Materials 34 .. Core Tools . 34 Blade Tools 50 Flake Tools, Flakes, and Chipping Debris 52 Raw Materials of Flaked Stone Tools • • 57 Miscellaneous Raw Materials , . • 62 Ground Stone Artifacts • 65 Miscellaneous 73 Poverty Point Objects • 74 Basketry-Impressed Baked Clay Objects 81 Pottery and Stone Vessels 87 4. Geological Analysis ••.•.. 90 5. Radiocarbon and Thermoluminescence Dates .106 iii 6. Comparisons with Other Sites .109 7. Summary and Conclusions .•117 References • .120 Index • • • • . • .124 ... ... - - - iv .. ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES Page 1. Teoc Creek Site Map • . • . • • . 2 2. 1966 Traverse 2 and 1970 Profile Trench 7 3. Details of Test Pit 3 (1969)· . 12 4. Horizontal Plan, Levell (1970) •. 14 5. Horizontal Plan, Levels 2-6 (1970). 19 ... 6. Engraved Slate Gorgets· • 68 7. Mississippi River Meander Belts · · · . 94 ... 8. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site Area - Stage A · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 96 ... 9. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site Area - Stage B · · · · · ·· · · ·· · ·· ·· · · · · · · · 98 10. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site ... Area - Stage C · · · · · ·· ·· · · · · · · · · · · ·· · · · · 100 11. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site ..
    [Show full text]
  • Over 5,000 Years of History in Eastern Connecticut
    OVER 5,000 YEARS OF HISTORY IN EASTERN CONNECTICUT The Story of the Tower Hill Road Site WHAT ARE CULTURAL RESOURCES AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT? Cultural resources may be anything that shows Unfortunately, these resources are fragile and evidence of having been made, used, or altered by nonrenewable. Unlike forests that can be replanted, humans. They represent the continuity of events once destroyed archaeological sites are gone forever. from the earliest evidence of human existence to the Objects from a site have little meaning unless they present day. Cultural resources that are pre-written can be related to specific soil layers (stratigraphy) record or pre-European contact in the New World and associated with other evidence of human activity, are called pre-contact or prehistoric, and those that such as a fire hearth, a trash pit, a burial pit, or the are post-written record/European contact are called structure of a building. Archaeologists call this post-contact or historic. Cultural resources range context . Any activity that disturbs the soil may from ruins that are thousands of years old to a destroy context and the scientific value of the nineteenth-century farmstead; from a small scattering archaeological site. A trained archaeologist manages of stone tools to an abandoned cart path. a site and records the information to preserve it for future generations. DIFFERENT TYPES OF CULTURAL RESOURCES bc a) Statue of Liberty in NY b) Kent Falls covered bridge in Litchfield County, CT c) Eighteenth century house foundation in Connecticut d) Native American pottery from New England d 2 IMAGINE EASTERN CONNECTICUT WITHOUT ROADS, BUILDINGS, OR FARM FIELDS AND WITH rich and varied forests, rolling hills, and free-flowing rivers and you have a picture of the landscape Native Americans inhabited thousands of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • OSL Ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic Components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 7 (2016) 94–103 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep OSL ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A. K. Rodrigues a,⁎, W.J. Rink b,M.B.Collinsc,T.J.Williamsc, A. Keen-Zebert d,G.I.Lόpez e a Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557, United States b School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada c Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States d Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89503, United States e Luminescence Dating Laboratory, CENIEH (Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca 3, Burgos 09002, Spain article info abstract Article history: The Gault Site, Texas, U.S.A., affords a near-complete regional prehistoric sequence from an ~2 m-thick alluvial Received 31 August 2015 sedimentary interval. Age estimates on Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components were obtained using Received in revised form 10 March 2016 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of silt-sized quartz grains. The luminescence characteristics of Accepted 11 March 2016 the quartz are favorable, showing normal equivalent dose distributions and no evidence of incomplete zeroing. Available online 12 April 2016 The artifacts span Clovis to Archaic forms, and their ages are generally in excellent agreement with independent radiocarbon ages from five other Texas sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis—An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species
    Gap Analysis Program Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis—An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species By S. Alex. Covert, Stephanie P. Kula, and Laura A. Simonson Open-File Report 2006–1385 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Covert, S.A., Kula, S.P., and Simonson, L.A., 2007, Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis: An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1385, 509 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Executive Summary...........................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]