Representation and De-Legitimation in Semi-Democratic Regimes: the Case of the Arab Citizens in Israel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Representation and De-Legitimation in Semi-Democratic Regimes: the Case of the Arab Citizens in Israel Sociology and Anthropology 6(5): 447-458, 2018 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/sa.2018.060501 Representation and De-legitimation in Semi-democratic Regimes: The Case of the Arab Citizens in Israel Salim Brake School of Political Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel Copyright©2018 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract In this article, I offer a brief examination of from time to time? the political model in Israel and review Arab representation Robert Dahl [1] has concluded the basic conditions for in the Knesset on the basis of the model I propose for the existence of democracy: some of them are effective describing Israel’s political system—that of the participation, voting equality, and control the agenda. All semi-democratic regime. I do not believe that the models these along with political culture which based on proposed by other scholars are applicable to the Israel case. respecting other’s rights, perception of equality as a value My assumption is that the parliamentary representation of as well as defending individual’s interests and properties. Arabs in Israel is blocked and ineffective; hence, Israel Despite its commitment, Israel has avoided adopting a cannot be seen as a full democracy. I will review the constitution, reinforcing the inferior status of the Arabs evolution of Arab parliamentary representation in Israel, its within the state by fostering set of rules and actions that function, and its outcomes as a test case for the claim of the have led to this condition and status. The most prominent manipulation of representation and exclusion from the of these rules is the continuation of implementing political sphere. I cannot discuss all the aspects of the emergency regulations since the establishment of the state Israeli regime that lead to this proposed model, but will and until this day, regulations that diminish the real focus on the patterns and trends in Arab Knesset meaning of democracy, especially in relation to Arabs membership, until recently, as a blatant example of a status and their basic rights. Most of the Israeli elite viewed semi-democracy. I will assert that the Arabs’ exclusion and still viewing Arabs as undesirable minority. from the centers of political power means that Israel cannot Accordingly, attitudes towards Arabs in Israel have be a democratic and egalitarian regime, but only an ersatz fluctuated between hostility and alienation. All this democracy, whose goal is to paint Israel as a democracy for together with additional other flaws such as religious external consumption, but nothing more. compulsion, the existence of occupation will be more than 50 years. Keywords Semi-Democracy, Representation, Ethnic Given such condition, does Israel’s self-declaration as a Minorities, De-legitimation, Arabs in Israel, Palestinians democratic state reliable? Is it strictness to fulfill the formal rules such as elections and limited extent of power separation enough for defining Israel as a democratic state? Many researchers consider the Israeli regime either as a 1 . Introduction kind of minimal democracy (Noeberger, [2]) or as a “low model of democracy” (Samooha, [3]), and some even Is it possible for democracy to exist without a completely reject the definition of Israel as a democratic constitution that defends individual’s rights from the state (Peled & Shafir, [4]; Yiftachel & Ghanem, [5]). All tyranny of the majority? Does a constitution guarantee this these researchers, who are Jewish, express difficulties protection, if yes, then in which conditions? Either way, is accepting the contradiction between the very formal rules it possible for real democracy to occur in the absence of of democracy and the non-democratic essence of Israel as a central constitutional section that protects and anchors state. individual’s rights and freedoms? A more annoying I suggest a different explanation for the nature of the question is; can real democracy exist in a political Israeli regime, which I believe as more convening, and it is atmosphere and among public opinion that most of it holds the Semi-Democracy model, that is to say an imitation of non-democratic attitudes and even anti-democratic ones the western democratic model which is liberal in its nature, 448 Representation and De-legitimation in Semi-democratic Regimes: The Case of the Arab Citizens in Israel with a constant attempt to conceal the anti-democratic the Arabs’ substantive representatives from centers of essence of the regime by declaration of commitment for influence and government power. I will assert that the Arab basic democratic rules, or continuous attempt of presenting representation in the Knesset is scarcely effective, because the fact of fulfillment parliamentary election as the most of the policy of distancing them from the political arena. import aspect of democracy, while neglecting essential Several means contribute to this ineffectiveness: flaws mentioned above, along with a high level of political The disproportionately low level of Arab violence, severe processes of other’s de-legitimation, and representation in the Knesset even incitement of government leaders against minorities, The policy of ineffective and token microcosmos against civil society organizations, and against the left side representation in the Zionist parties, which severs parties, as we have been witnessing during the last decade. these parliamentarians' interests from those of the Therefore, Semi-Democracy is considered or would be a Arab citizens regime model committed only to formal parliamentary The shunting of Arab parliamentarians to the rules of democracy that are based on enlistment of public sidelines of the Knesset and distancing from any opinion by the media, which is directed by the influence on the coalition or on government policy governmental elite, as well as on the ability to change the The delegitimization of the representatives selected game rules in unequal and unfair ways by changing by the Arabs themselves, as a follow-up to the legislation using the constant available majority and effort to delegitimize the Arab citizens themselves employing violent manners which are not obligated to In what follows, I will briefly review the changing values of respect of minorities’ rights and not even to patterns of Arab parliamentary representation since Israel’s essential commitment for respecting the very basic rights founding. I will also present data about Arab Knesset of the individual. membership and Arab MKs’ presence in Knesset organs There are more tangible examples of why the State of and posts. Israel should be classified as a semi-democratic regime than those can be mentioned here. They include: Israel’s character as a state of ethnic stratification that is not committed to the values of general civic equality; 1 its 2. Methodology definition as a Jewish state, which implies a significant degree of religious coercion that infringes civil liberties The research is based mainly on a series of interviews I and, in particular, excludes Arabs because they are not conducted with several members of Knesset (MKs), both Jewish and defines them as second-class citizens, no matter Arab and non-Arab. These were open-ended interviews, their actions or conduct;2 the general policy towards the recorded as audio files and transcribed. I also surveyed the Arabs; the discrimination against them in all fields of life; work of Arab Knesset members, both those of Zionist the existence of a “secret state”; their subjection to parties and those affiliated with parties that represent the Emergency Regulations; and harsh manifestations Arab sector. I found that neither group exerted a significant expressions of racism, including by leaders such as the influence on Israeli politics, excerpt for the “blocking Prime Minister, other ministers, and Knesset members. The majority” and the short period of direct elections for Prime occupation regime in the territories and acute militarization Minister—the exceptions that prove my basic assertions. It of Israeli society can be added to the mix. However, in this is not intended to further the welfare of the Arabs in Israel, article, I will focus on patterns of representation and assert but only to provide a false image that serves the that although Israel is a semi-democratic regime that semi-democratic regime by allowing it to present itself adheres to the formal rules of democracy, it is not internationally as a representative democracy with equal committed to core democratic values such as civic equality. rights for all. The parliamentary representation of the For this purpose, I will review the Joint Arab List’s Arab-Palestinian minority is limited in scope and parliamentary output over the past two years and examine effectiveness in two basic ways: its token and ineffective several important cases that reveal its fecklessness as an inclusion in the Zionist parties, intended to display a effective representative of the Arab minority in Israel. pretense of inclusion and legitimacy; and the exclusion of 1 There are serious charges of discrimination in Israel against Jews of 3. Parliamentary Representation: Arab and Middle Eastern and especially Ethiopian origin. This ethnic rift is one of the strongest divisions in the country, with discrimination in Some Theoretical Background housing, employment, standard of living, education, and other fields. For a broader discussion, see, for example, Smooha [6]. 2 The clearest case of discrimination against the Arab citizens, based only Much has been written about the essence and importance on religion, is that of the Druze, who serve in the military yet are of representation, in democracy in general and in liberal nevertheless victims of discrimination in all fields of life and excluded from most sectors of the economy. The Druze villages are in the four democracy in particular. The first thinkers to discuss the lowest clusters of the socioeconomic scale, like all other Arab localities.
Recommended publications
  • Israel: Background and U.S
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Casey L. Addis Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs February 14, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33476 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence and was immediately engaged in a war with all of its neighbors. Armed conflict has marked every decade of Israel’s existence. Despite its unstable regional environment, Israel has developed a vibrant parliamentary democracy, albeit with relatively fragile governments. The most recent national elections were held on February 10, 2009, ahead of schedule. Although the Kadima Party placed first, parties holding 65 seats in the 120-seat Knesset supported opposition Likud party leader Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, who was designated to form a government. Netanyahu’s coalition includes his own Likud, Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel Our Home), Shas, Habayet Hayehudi (Jewish Home), the United Torah Judaism (UTJ), and the new Ha’atzmout (Independence) party. The coalition controls 66 of 120 Knesset seats. Israel has an advanced industrial, market economy with a large government role. Israel’s foreign policy is focused largely on its region, Europe, and the United States. Israel’s foreign policy agenda begins with Iran, which it views as an existential threat due to Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and support for terrorism. Achieving peace with its neighbors is next. Israel concluded peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, but not with Syria and Lebanon. Recent unrest in Egypt is rekindling latent anxiety in Israel about the durability of the peace treaty Egypt and Israel have relied upon for 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • General 'Zionist Gain, Mapoi Strength Maik Vote
    .... ~-.-. }'.. '..\, PijQYJ~Ct~L lilAARY PA~lf~UEuf ILO~S ~--. \ '-------------------------··\YllfNIP£.C, • I Ex-1,nmi!lrant .Gives . , . , . • ··o·,-.. -n··-··. Hospital -$1 Million . -. ,'' .. :· ·. --~- .rive n . # ?.r:w YORK fYl1l?,OJ-A Ri:z.. l in ~ 1n 19C3. _ iun-J'n"..&!.. 1-.m'iµ-a.'lt "Jtr~? ar- i He e:scape,:110 G=r vhere ., rt-r~ l.'1 tbe 'C'S 10 l'C:2ni a:;:o re- ! h.e rr.ac!e a f«!.une 1n the b".abcs ~7 pe:,:l!us, 1art vttk TM l c;! lln;;em. tmlle:a li!ld bttt ny­ reTCaled r.o Ju-;e gtvm u.o-..n: l 1:,::.g. The rl<e o! Niul!m d.rtn"e £!:w .l!.oQ!tal bee ,11.m,000. h1m to ~-lz1= b'Jt I.he :.az: 1n- oon~ Tl.e ma.n wlw m:i.:e Ui-i:, dcn:i- ~ ca·ug!lt Ill> wlt.'1 him and - . t!.tm, Prant z. Atnn. 11'2.S a revo- · h1s ~ we7e c:on!l.scat.ed by • . ·' failom.-7 tn hlsO yD'".:th ln Ru:.:!a the Gmrui.ns. _ ' Th-? !-.ad to nee to · Gem.any, He came to the ua tn lW and 1"h."l"e "he made a ro:tu.'le Ia~ '!01:ll!n a zhon period, aucceeded ul::en tro=. him by the Naz!s. In renewing his_ cld com:ectlous Born l.'1 s::n~ia !."l the provinee a:id rebulldlng h1s ~ an an ot K!ev In 1£?5, Atran as a :;o-.:th .
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy
    Luke Howson University of Liverpool The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy By Luke Howson July 2014 Committee: Clive Jones, BA (Hons) MA, PhD Prof Jon Tonge, PhD 1 Luke Howson University of Liverpool © 2014 Luke Howson All Rights Reserved 2 Luke Howson University of Liverpool Abstract This thesis focuses on the role of ultra-orthodox party Shas within the Israeli state as a means to explore wider themes and divisions in Israeli society. Without underestimating the significance of security and conflict within the structure of the Israeli state, in this thesis the Arab–Jewish relationship is viewed as just one important cleavage within the Israeli state. Instead of focusing on this single cleavage, this thesis explores the complex structure of cleavages at the heart of the Israeli political system. It introduces the concept of a ‘cleavage pyramid’, whereby divisions are of different saliency to different groups. At the top of the pyramid is division between Arabs and Jews, but one rung down from this are the intra-Jewish divisions, be they religious, ethnic or political in nature. In the case of Shas, the religious and ethnic elements are the most salient. The secular–religious divide is a key fault line in Israel and one in which ultra-orthodox parties like Shas are at the forefront. They and their politically secular counterparts form a key division in Israel, and an exploration of Shas is an insightful means of exploring this division further, its history and causes, and how these groups interact politically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Party and the Peace Camp
    The Labor Party and the Peace Camp By Uzi Baram In contemporary Israeli public discourse, the preoccupation with ideology has died down markedly, to the point that even releasing a political platform as part of elections campaigns has become superfluous. Politicians from across the political spectrum are focused on distinguishing themselves from other contenders by labeling themselves and their rivals as right, left and center, while floating around in the air are slogans such as “political left,” social left,” “soft right,” “new right,” and “mainstream right.” Yet what do “left” and “right” mean in Israel, and to what extent do these slogans as well as the political division in today’s Israel correlate with the political traditions of the various parties? Is the Labor Party the obvious and natural heir of The Workers Party of the Land of Israel (Mapai)? Did the historical Mapai under the stewardship of Ben Gurion view itself as a left-wing party? Did Menachem Begin’s Herut Party see itself as a right-wing party? The Zionist Left and the Soviet Union As far-fetched as it may seem in the eyes of today’s onlooker, during the first years after the establishment of the state, the position vis-à-vis the Soviet Union was the litmus test of the left camp, which was then called “the workers’ camp.” This camp viewed the centrist liberal “General Zionists” party, which was identified with European liberal and middle-class beliefs in private property and capitalism, as its chief ideological rival (and with which the heads of major cities such as Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan were affiliated)­.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of an Ethnic Political Party: a Case Study of Arab Political Parties in Israel
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) 2014 The Success of an Ethnic Political Party: A Case Study of Arab Political Parties in Israel Samira Abunemeh University of Mississippi. Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Abunemeh, Samira, "The Success of an Ethnic Political Party: A Case Study of Arab Political Parties in Israel" (2014). Honors Theses. 816. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/816 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Success of an Ethnic Political Party: A Case Study of Arab Political Parties in Israel ©2014 By Samira N. Abunemeh A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion Of the Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies Croft Institute for International Studies Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi May 2014 Approved: Dr. Miguel Centellas Reader: Dr. Kees Gispen Reader: Dr. Vivian Ibrahim i Abstract The Success of an Ethnic Political Party: A Case Study of Arab Political Parties in Israel Israeli Arab political parties are observed to determine if these ethnic political parties are successful in Israel. A brief explanation of four Israeli Arab political parties, Hadash, Arab Democratic Party, Balad, and United Arab List, is given as well as a brief description of Israeli history and the Israeli political system.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews in General Anders' Army in the Soviet Union
    Jews in General Anders’ Army In the Soviet Union by Yisrael Gutman 1. The Organizational Phase Mustering of the Polish Armed Forces in the Soviet Union (Polskie Sity Zborjne w ZSSR), known as “Anders’ Army”, began during the latter half of 1941. Until the end of July 1941, the Polish Government-in-Exile in London had not maintained diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, condemning her as an invader who had conspired with Nazi Germany to seize the eastern portions of Poland during the invasion of 1939. Even the dramatic volte-face in the wake of Hitler’s attack on the Soviet Union on July 22, 1941 did not bring about an immediate thaw in Polish-Soviet relations. The Polish Prime Minister in Exile, Wladyslaw Sikorski, maintained that Poland should seek avenues of consultation with the Soviet Union and that she should join the new alignment of forces arising out of the Soviet Union’s entering the anti-Nazi camp. The Poles did insist however that any agreement with the Soviet Union be conditional upon an unequivocal Soviet commitment that the Polish state to be reconstituted after the war have its former eastern borders reinstated – that is, the Soviet Union was to rescind its annexation of Western Byelorussia, the Western Ukraine and the Vilna district. The Soviets refused to undertake any such commitment while the tense and exhausting deliberations on the issue resulted in a split amongst the Poles. The radical faction among the Polish exiles — the Endeks,* the last of the Sanacja** supporters of Pilsudski and also a minority of the socialists — would not agree to any formulation that did * Members of the Narodowa Demokracja — ND — The right-wing National- Democratic Party, of an extreme anti-Semitic character.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 January 2013 / 14 Shevat 5773 Volume 17 - Number 2 News Opinion Letters Tapestry Community Columns Youth Sports
    friday 25 january 2013 / 14 Shevat 5773 volume 17 - number 2 news opinion letters tapestry community columns youth sports Aviva Pelham south african sings her mother’s story. (page 10) jewish report www.sajewishreport.co.za Likud leads, but bumpy road ahead for Netanyahu BEN SALES rupled its representation from TEL AVIV three to 12 seats. Together with the Sephardic His party shrunk, his opponents Orthodox Shas party and the grew and his challengers multi- haredi Orthodox United Torah plied. Judaism, the rightwing Knesset But with the results in, it bloc will hold 62 of the Knesset’s seems Benjamin Netanyahu sur- 120 seats - a slim majority. vived the Knesset elections on That’s anything but a mandate Tuesday to serve another term for Netanyahu, who campaigned as prime minister. on the slogan: “A strong prime Netanyahu faces a bumpy road minister, a strong Israel”. ahead. His Likud party, together Instead of being able to lead a with the nationalist Yisrael new coalition with a large party Beiteinu, fell to 31 seats in the behind him, Netanyahu will voting from its current represen- have to negotiate with rivals and tation of 42. forge compromises with oppos- The biggest surprise of the ing camps. election was the ascendance Judging from the successes of of former TV personality Yair Yesh Atid, Labour and Jewish Lapid’s centrist Yesh Atid party. Home, Israelis cast a resounding Founded just a year ago, Yesh vote for progressive economic Atid won 18 seats on a platform reform and new leaders in their of national service and pro- parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Agency South Africa: a Year in Review
    ZIONIST ANNUAL REPORT DGNJSR The Jewish Agency South Africa: A Year in Review 2013 DGNJSR TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE ISRAEL CENTRE 2 GREETINGS 4-6 ISRAEL ENCOUNTER 2013 7 THE JEWISH AGENCY MISHLACHAT 8-9 (DELEGATION) TO SOUTH AFRICA 2013-14 THE ISRAEL QUIZ 2013 10 ZIONIST CARAVAN 11 ALIYAH2GETHER 12 HIGHER EDUCATION EXPO 13 ABOUT THE ISRAEL CENTRE The Israel Centre represents The Jewish Agency for Israel in South Africa. We are committed CYCALIVE 14 to strengthening the connection between the South African Jewish community and the PARTNERSHIP2GETHER ARTISTS DELEGATION 15 State of Israel, through various programmes and comprehensive Zionist Education. ALIYAH NOW EXPO 2013 16 Through Partnership2Gether, we are proud to join with the Beit Shemesh-Mateh Yehuda region in Israel and Washington DC to connect Jewish Communities in Israel and the PARTNERSHIP2GETHER COEXISTENCE SOCCER DELEGATION 17 Diaspora. ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENTS 18-19 Working closely with our Shlichim, we maintain vital ties with our Zionist Youth SAZF ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 20-23 Movements. JNF ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 24-25 The Israel Centre offers various educational programmes, including Israel Encounter and ABOUT THE SOUTH AFRICAN ZIONIST FEDERATION 26 Masa Israel Journey gap year, study abroad, post-college and volunteer programs in Israel. With over 200 unique programmes on offer, the Israel Centre does its best to match the ABOUT THE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL 26 most suitable programme to the individual. Through our Maoz Education Program, the Israel Centre works closely with the formal and informal Jewish education systems to create and maintain the vital bond between young Jews and Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Form: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Israel- Elections 2003
    1 Macro Report Form: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Israel- Elections 2003 Part I: Data Pertinent To the Election at Which the Module was Administered 1. Name of political party and No. of portfolios – prior to elections Likud – 13 (9 ministers with portfolios, 3 ministers without portfolios and P.M Sharon with 4 portfolios) Labor (Avoda) – 6 Shas – 5 Israel Baaliya –2 Mafdal – 2 1a. 28 ministers. 2. Name of political party and No. of portfolios – after the elections Likud – 14 (11 ministers with portfolios and P.M Sharon with 3 portfolios) Mafdal – 2 Shinui – 5 National Union –2 2a. 23 ministers. 3. Political Parties: Party Year party founded Ideological family Likud (Herut) Herut -1948 ; became Right liberal parties “Likud”- 1973 Labor- “Avoda”, (Mapai)* Mapai-1920 ; became Social-democratic parties “Avoda”- 1968 Shinui 1974; renewed 1999 Liberal parties Shas 1984 Religious parties (Ultra-orthodox) Meretz (Civil rights Civil rights movement- Left socialist parties movement) 1973; became “Meretz”- 2 1992 National Union (Moledet- Moledet-Tkuma-1988; Extreme nationalist parties Tkuma) National Union- 1999 *Belongs to the Socialist International. 3a. No. 3b. No. Labor Party- with electoral support of 19 seats out of 120. 3c. No. 4a. Ideological positions of parties: Likud-7 Labor-3 Shinui-5 Shas-8 Meretz – 2 National Union-9 4aa. Yes. 4b. The respondents were not asked to rank political parties on an alternative dimension. 5. The five most salient factors that affected the outcome of the elections: 1. Intifada- Terrorism- Arafat. 2. Sharon’s leadership. 3. The weak Labor alternative. 4. Shinui as a protest vote; religious tensions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gramscian Analysis of the Hamula and the Relations Between the Israeli State and Palestinian Arab Citizens of Israel
    A TALE OF TWO VILLAGES: A GRAMSCIAN ANALYSIS OF THE HAMULA AND THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE ISRAELI STATE AND PALESTINIAN ARAB CITIZENS OF ISRAEL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY UMUT KOLDAŞ IN PARTIAL FULLFILMENT OF THE REQUIREEMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SEPTEMBER 2008 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Meliha B. Altunışık Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Meliha B. Altunışık Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. İhsan Duran Dağı (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Meliha B. Altunışık (METU, IR) Assist. Prof. Galip Yalman (METU, ADM) Assist. Prof. Özlem Tür (METU, IR) Assist Prof. İlker Aytürk (BILKENT, IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Signature : iii ABSTRACT A TALE OF TWO VILLAGES: A GRAMSCIAN ANALYSIS OF THE HAMULA AND THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE ISRAELI STATE AND PALESTINIAN ARAB CITIZENS OF ISRAEL Koldaş, Umut Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • CANDIDATES, PARTIES and BLOCS Israel in the 1990S
    02 Arian (JB/D) 5/10/01 11:36 am Page 689 PARTY POLITICS VOL 7. No.6 pp. 689–710 Copyright © 2001 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi CANDIDATES, PARTIES AND BLOCS Israel in the 1990s Asher Arian and Michal Shamir ABSTRACT The Israeli party system, its parties and its voters, have undergone tremendous change. From a stable dominant party system through a competitive two-bloc system, it finds itself in the 1990s in a state of dealignment, with weakening parties, loosening party ties, fragmen- tation, growing volatility and frequent turnover in government. The combination of electoral reform, which instituted direct elections of the Prime Minister, new voting groups, and international shifts exacerbated in Israel the processes which characterize all Western democracies. While the party system and the parties are in disarray, candidates, issues and the political blocs of left and right grow in importance. KEY WORDS Ⅲ dealignment Ⅲ Israel Ⅲ issue voting Ⅲ left–right blocs Political systems change, and they change in complex ways. Just as a range of factors affects the decision of the individual voter, myriad forces drive the transformation of a society and its political system. The rules of the game may be altered; new groups of voters may emerge; international or econ- omic shifts may present new challenges. Were one to seek an apt site and an appropriate setting to study these matters, the choice of the 1999 elections in Israel would be most felicitous. Some observers, especially in the foreign media, interpreted the election of Ehud Barak as prime minister as a fundamental sea change in Israeli priorities and belief patterns.
    [Show full text]