DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework László Pintér, Dóra Almássy, Ella Antonio, Sumiko Hatakeyama, Ingeborg Niestroy, Simon Olsen, Grazyna Pulawska January 2014 Singapore Published by: Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) 31 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119595 Designed and Printed by: Xpress Print Ltd No 1 Kallang Way 2A Singapore 347495 ISBN: 978-981-07-9121-6 Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet — Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework Laszlo Pinter, Dora Almassy, Ella Antonio, Sumiko Hatakeyama, Ingeborg Niestroy, Simon Olsen, Grazyna Pulawska Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the co-organizers, publisher or editors of this volume. ASEF’s contribution is made with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein are in no way reflective of the official opinion or position of the European Union. Table of Contents Preface & Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................3 List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................4 List of Tables and Figures ...........................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................6 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................11 2. Conceptual Approach and Methodology .........................................................................................17 3. Sustainable Development Goals and Sub-Goals Based on Thematic Priorities....................................21 3.1 Priority Theme 1: Poverty and Inequality.................................................................................23 3.2 Priority Theme 2: Health and Population ................................................................................27 3.3 Priority Theme 3: Education and Learning ..............................................................................30 3.4 Priority Theme 4: Quality of Growth and Employment ............................................................33 3.5 Priority Theme 5: Settlements, Infrastructure and Transport ....................................................36 3.6 Priority Theme 6: Sustainable Production and Consumption and Economic Sectors ................39 3.7 Priority Theme 7: Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture and Fisheries ....................................42 3.8 Priority Theme 8: Energy and Climate Change .......................................................................45 3.9 Priority Theme 9: Water Availability and Access ......................................................................48 3.10 Priority Theme 10: Biodiversity and Ecosystems ......................................................................51 3.11 Priority Theme 10+1: Adaptive Governance and Means of Implementation ............................54 4. Lessons Learned and Guidance for Country-Level SDG Development ...............................................57 5. Guidance for SDG Implementation ..................................................................................................62 6. Conclusions .....................................................................................................................................66 7. References .......................................................................................................................................68 Annex 1: Definition of Key Terms ............................................................................................................73 Annex 2: Available online Annex 3: Illustrative Indicators. See inside of the back pocket. Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet • Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework 1 2 Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet • Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework PREFACE & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)—one of the most resonant and unifying commitments in the international community’s history—will come to an end in 2015. The 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) concluded with a decision to create a new global development framework through a set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that would take the place of the MDGs after 2015. Whereas MDGs mostly target the elimination of poverty, the SDGs encompass all dimensions of sustainable development: economic, social and environmental. At the 9th Asia-Europe Meeting Summit (ASEM Summit) that took place in Lao PDR in November 2012, Asian and European leaders supported the call for a set of universally applicable SDGs and emphasized the need for an inclusive process in their elaboration. In line with its mandate, the Asia-Europe Environment Forum (ENVforum) responded to the ASEM leaders’ call and undertook this research project: Sustainable Development Goals for a Small Planet. The ENVforum’s report tries a unique approach to the formulation of SDGs: by enriching the ongoing global discourse with national perspectives. Combining analyses of top-down international processes and bottom- up country-level strategy documents, the research involved a five-step process that resulted in 11 high-level goals (10+1) and respective underlying sub-goals, which are presented in this interim report. The mix of organizations in this initiative reflects the ongoing multistakeholder dialogues on the environment and sustainable development in the two regions: dialogues between regional organizations and regional blocs; individual Asian and European countries; governments and civil society; academic researchers and practitioners; and grassroots and international organizations. The report was launched as an interim draft on November 5, 2013 at the Green Growth and Sustainable Development Goals conference of ENVforum in Seoul. It was also presented on November 26, 2013 in a side-event at the Fifth Session of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals. This version takes into account the comments received. The co-organizers would like to thank the following individuals and institutions, without which this project would have not been possible: László Pintér from the International Institute for Sustainable Development- Europe (IISD-Europe) and the Central European University (CEU), Dora Almassy from CEU and the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC); Ella Antonio from the Earth Council Asia- Pacific; Ingeborg Niestroy from Public Strategies for Sustainable Development (PS4SD); Simon Olsen and Peter King from the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES); Thierry Schwarz, Grazyna Pulawska and Sumiko Hatakeyama from the Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF). The ENVforum is a partnership initiated by ASEF with ASEM SMEs Eco-Innovation Center (ASEIC), the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida), the Hanns Seidel Foundation Indonesia (HSF) and IGES, in co-operation with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). ENVforum Secretariat Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet • Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS AROPE At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion ASEF Asia-Europe Foundation ASEM Asia-Europe Meeting CBDR Common But Differentiated Responsibilities ENVforum Asia-Europe Environment Forum GEO Global Environment Outlook GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse Gas HDI Human Development Index HLP High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda ILO International Labour Organization IISD International Institute for Sustainable Development MDGs Millennium Development Goals MSME Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises ODA Overseas Development Assistance OWG Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals SCP Sustainable Consumption and Production SDGs Sustainable Development Goals SDSN Sustainable Development Solutions Network UN United Nations UNCSD United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNSTT United Nations System Task Team UNTST United Nations Technical Support Team 4 Sustainable Development Goals and Indicators for a Small Planet • Part I: Methodology and Goal Framework LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 3.1: The 10+1 goals and goal statements for the countries on the Small Planet Table 3.3: Goal and sub-goal statements for poverty and inequality Table 3.3: Goal and sub-goal statements for health and population Table 3.4: Goal and sub-goal statements for education and learning Table 3.5: Goal and sub-goal statements for growth and employment Table 3.6: Goal and sub-goal statements for settlements, infrastructure and transport Table 3.7: Goal and sub-goal statements for SCP and economic sectors Table 3.8: Goal and sub-goal statements for food security, sustainable agriculture and fisheries Table 3.9: Goal and sub-goal statements for energy and climate change Table 3.10: Goal and sub-goal statements for water availability and access Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Behavioural Climate Change Mitigation Options Domain Report Food Delft, CE Delft, April 2012
    Behavioural Climate Change Mitigation Options Domain Report Food Report Delft, April 2012 Author(s): Jasper Faber, Maartje Sevenster, Agnieszka Markowska, Martine Smit (CE Delft) Karin Zimmermann, Rafat Soboh, Jonathan van ’t Riet ( LEI) Publication Data Bibliographical data: Jasper Faber, Maartje Sevenster, Agnieszka Markowska Martine Smit (CE Delft), Karin Zimmermann, Rafat Soboh, Jonathan van ’t Riet ( LEI) Behavioural Climate Change Mitigation Options Domain Report Food Delft, CE Delft, April 2012 Behaviour / Climate change / Mitigation / Model research / Analysis / Policy / Food Publication code: 12.7316.03 CE publications are available from www.cedelft.eu. Commissioned by: European Commission, DG Climate Action, contract number 070307/2010/576075/SER/A4. Further information on this study can be obtained from the contact person, Jasper Faber. © copyright, CE Delft, Delft CE Delft Committed to the Environment CE Delft is an independent research and consultancy organisation specialised in developing structural and innovative solutions to environmental problems. CE Delft’s solutions are characterised in being politically feasible, technologically sound, economically prudent and socially equitable. 2 April 2012 7.316.1 – Behavioural Climate Change Mitigation Options - FOOD Preface This is the final report on Behavioural Climate Change Mitigation Options in the Food Domain. It is part of the study Behavioural Climate Change Mitigation Options and Their Appropriate Inclusion in Quantitative Longer Term Policy Scenarios for the European Commission, DG Climate Action. The aim of the study is threefold: 1. To assess and demonstrate the GHG emission reduction potential of changes in behaviour and consumption patterns. 2. To analyse policy options for the further development of community policies and measures inducing changes in behaviour and consumption patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Seafood Campaign
    Sustainable Seafood Campaign Overfishing and destructive fishing are among the most significant threats facing our oceans. The UN reports that three-quarters of global fish stocks are either fully exploited or overexploited. Scientists estimate that 90% of top marine predators such as tuna and sharks are already gone. Pirate fishing, estimated to account for up to a third of the global catch, is notorious for targeting at-risk populations and using highly destructive methods. Destructive fishing indiscriminately kills “non-target” species, including marine mammals and seabirds, and destroys habitats that marine species depend on for survival. In addition to the direct and cascading effects on marine ecosystems, overfishing and destructive fishing make our ocean ecosystems more vulnerable to global warming. If current trends continue, scientists predict global fisheries will collapse in forty years. U.S. consumers buy half their seafood at supermarkets, to the tune of $16 billion every year. As consumer interest in sustainable products has grown, so have retailer efforts to promote their eco-friendly initiatives. Yet, few supermarkets have made significant efforts to improve their seafood sustainability. Greenpeace is calling on supermarkets to sell only sustainable seafood and to support positive reforms in fisheries management. By doing so, supermarkets will do their part to help avert the crisis facing our oceans while ensuring their customers quality fish from sustainable fisheries for years to come. Supermarkets have enormous purchasing power, and are well positioned to influence the way the fishing industry operates. What You Can Do! Greenpeace needs your help monitoring supermarket seafood policies and practices. The information you gather will be used to update our supermarket scorecard.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Cycle of Poverty in Young Families
    POLICY REPORT | APRIL 2015 Breaking the Cycle of Poverty in Young Families TwO-GEneration Policy RecommEnd ations The two-generation approach is a poverty reduction strategy meeting the unique needs of both parents and children simultaneously, which differs from other models that provide service provision to parents or their children separately. The focus of this two-generation research was specifically young families, which are defined as out-of-school, out-of-work youth 15–24 with dependent children under the age of 6. Families in poverty can best be served by addressing parental needs for education, workforce training, and parental skills, while also addressing child development essentials. The recent economic downturn has tremendously impacted communities and families in the United States, especially young families. Over 1.4 million youth ages 15–24 are out-of-school, out-of-work and raising dependent children. When youth are out of the education system, lack early work experience, and cannot find employment, it is unlikely that they will have the means to support themselves.1 Too often, this traps their families in a cycle of poverty for generations. With generous support from the Annie E. Casey Foundation and ASCEND at the Aspen Institute, the National Human Services Assembly (NHSA), an association of America’s leading human service nonprofit organizations, set out to identify policy and administrative barriers to two- generation strategies. The NHSA engaged its member organizations and local affiliates to better understand their two-generation programs, challenges to success, and strategies for overcoming. It also convened advo- cates, experts, and local providers together to determine the appropriate government strategies to break the cycle of poverty in young families.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Logistics & Supply Chain Management
    SUSTAINABLE LOGISTICS & SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT Approved: ___________________________________ Date:_12/21/2018_______ Paper/Project Advisor 1 Sustainable Logistics & Supply Chain Management: Challenges & Future Outlook ISCM 7920 Seminar Paper Research University of Wisconsin – Platteville Professor Wendy Brooke Gary Curioso December 13th, 2018 Table of Contents 2 I. Abstract 3 II. Introduction and Statement of the Problem 4 III. Literature Review 10 IV. Challenges and Trends of Sustainability 17 V. Sustainability in Practice 27 VI. Outcome of the Study 38 VII. Key Developments, Recommendations and Conclusion 44 VIII. Reference 54 I. Abstract 3 Sustainability has increasingly become a growing concern for consumers, businesses, governments and communities. In recent years, mounting regulatory pressures, scarcity of natural resources, and increased population and urban growth have prompted companies to remain competitive and continuously deliver new products and services in today’s marketplace. There have also been increased levels of waste, and growing demands from customers and stakeholders. Due to these issues, companies develop efficient and sustainable supply chain operations to gain positive results and uncover monetary benefits. The purpose of this study is to analyze various challenges and trends affecting the global supply chain and logistics. The study recognizes several sustainable supply chain management practices and initiatives and focuses on the economic, environmental and social impacts. In addition, the study provides some key measures and recommendations for organizations to adopt a sustainable supply chain operation. The findings were developed and evaluated based on journal readings, literature review studies, textbooks and articles. The unique synergies between sustainable supply chain versus traditional logistical and supply chain practices have been instrumental by incorporating the triple-bottom line theory within the organization’s logistics and supply chain operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Reduction Strategies for the US
    Poverty Reduction Strategies for the US August 2008 Mary Jo Bane Harvard Kennedy School Prepared for the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation “Defining Poverty Reduction Strategies” Project Contact Information: Mary Jo Bane Thornton Bradshaw Professor of Public Policy and Management Littauer 320 Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Mailbox 20 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 617-496-9703 617-496-0811 (Fax) Email: [email protected] Strategy #1: Construct the infrastructure for practical, well-managed poverty alleviation initiatives, including appropriate measures for assessing success and learning from experience. This strategy recognizes that “poverty” is a complex set of problems, and that poverty alleviation can only be accomplished by a portfolio of policies and programs tailored to specific aspects of the problem. It recognizes that poverty alleviation efforts must reflect the best practices in public management, including the specification of concrete goals, the assessment of the strategies and the ability to learn and improve. In this context, the current official measure of poverty is nearly useless either for figuring out what the problems are, for assessing whether any progress has been made in addressing the problems or for stimulating systematic and creative approaches to trying out and evaluating solutions to different variants of poverty problems. This strategy sets the stage for problem solving efforts at the community as well as the national level to identify specific problems that can be tackled, to create
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Reduction Strategies from an HIV/AIDS Perspective
    APRIL 2005 • LISA ARREHAG AND MIRJA SJÖBLOM POM Working Paper 2005:6 Poverty Reduction Strategies from an HIV/AIDS Perspective Foreword The Department for Policy and Methodology within Sida (POM) is responsible for leading and coordinating Sida’s work on policy and meth- odological development and for providing support and advice to the field organisation and Sida’s departments on policy and methodological issues relating to development cooperation. It links together analysis, methodo- logical development, internal competence and capacity development and advisory support. The department undertakes analyses and serves as a source of knowl- edge on issues pertaining to poverty and its causes. Learning and exchanges of experiences and knowledge are essential to all aspects of development cooperation. This series of Working Papers aims to serve as an instrument for dissemination of knowledge and opin- ions and for fostering discussion. The views and conclusions expressed in the Working Papers are those of the authors and do not necessarily coincide with those of Sida. HIV/AIDS has fundamental implications on virtually all aspects of social and economic development in the worst affected countries and constitutes one of the most difficult obstacles to human development facing the world today. The present study provides a review and analysis of poverty reduction strategies (PRS) from eight countries, primarily in sub-Saharan Africa, from an HIV/AIDS perspective. It examines the extent and manner in which HIV/AIDS is taken into account in these strategies with regard to the three main perspectives; prevention, treat- ment and consequences. It is our hope that the study will stimulate reflection and discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting the Advantages of Sustainable and Healthy Eating Using Food Demonstration Kiosks and Webpage Interventions
    Promoting the advantages of sustainable and healthy eating using food demonstration kiosks and webpage interventions Claire Chartrand School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition McGill University Montreal, Quebec Submitted May 2013 A project report submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of M.Sc. (Applied) Nutrition. © Claire Chartrand 2013 1 Table of Contents Preamble ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Methods......................................................................................................................................... 10 Behavior Change Theory .......................................................................................................... 10 Intervention ............................................................................................................................... 11 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 12 Measures ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Shaping Sustainable Lifestyles
    A framework for shaping sustainable lifestyles determinants and strategies Acknowledgements Authors: Lewis Akenji (IGES), Huizhen Chen Contributors: Garrette Clark (UN Environment), Stefanos Fotiou (UN ESCAP), Mari Nishimura (UN Environment) Reviewers: We would like to thank the following for their valuable technical inputs: Midori Aoyagi (National Institute for Environmental Studies), Julian Borra (ThinAirFactory), Kate Burningham (University of Surrey), Maite Cortés (Colectivo Ecologista Jalisco), Gunilla Elsasser (WWF), Maria Ghiso (Rainforest Alliance), Bronwyn Hayward (University of Canterbury), Tim Jackson (University of Surrey), Vimlendu Kumar JHA (Swechha India), Michael Lettenmeier (D-mat), Nguyen Hong Long (GetGreen Vietnam), Charlie Mathews (JUCCCE), Zipporah Musyoki-Webola (WWF), Kenneth Ochoa (Universidad El Bosque), Peter Repinski (Stockholm Environment Institute), Ingrid Joan Schudel (Rhodes University), Burcu Tuncer (SWITCH-Med), and UN Environment (Khairoon Abbas, Kamala Ernest, Bettina Heller, Arab Hoballah, Rob de Jong, James Lomax, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Martina Otto, Liazzat Rabbiosi, Helena Rey de Assis, Janet Salem, Steven Stone, Elisa Tonda, and Adriana Zacarias). Concept of Figures: Jeremy Blanks Design: Viola Kup (UN Environment) Cover Photo: Hong Kong Market © Yusuke Nishimura Back Photo: Smiling Youth ©Jerome Sessini/ Magnum Photos for UN Environment DTI/1717/PA © United Nations Environment Programme, 2016 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Environment Programme would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Poverty Laura Wheaton and Jamyang Tashi
    Measuring Poverty Laura Wheaton and Jamyang Tashi Many agree that the official measure of poverty in the United States is flawed. The official measure is based on cash income, and the thresholds for measuring poverty are based on outdated data. Experts have recommended an alternative measure of poverty that includes all family resources net of taxes and nondiscretionary expenses and updates the thresholds to reflect current spending patterns (Citro and Michael 1995; Iceland 2005). Representative Jim McDermott (D-WA) and Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) have co- sponsored the Measuring American Poverty (MAP) Act, which recommends a modern poverty measure based on this alternative. • The official measure of poverty includes pretax cash income sources in its definition, and it uses a threshold based on a subsistence food budget times three. The measure was developed in 1963 and is based on spending patterns observed in a 1955 consumption survey. The thresholds represent nationwide spending averages, adjusted for inflation. The thresholds vary by family size, number of children, and whether the family is headed by an older adult. The official measure assumes that adults age 65 and older need less money to support their basic needs than younger adults. - In 2006, a family consisting of one adult and one child was considered poor if its cash income fell below $13,896, and a family of two adults and two children was considered poor if its income fell below $20,444.1 - In 2006, a family consisting of two elderly adults was considered poor if its cash income fell below $12,186. • The alternative measure of poverty developed by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in 1995 uses a definition that includes both cash and in-kind income and subtracts taxes and nondiscretionary work-related and out-of- pocket health expenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Claims and Perceived Product Quality: the Moderating Role of Brand CSR
    sustainability Article Sustainability Claims and Perceived Product Quality: The Moderating Role of Brand CSR Jenny van Doorn, Peter C. Verhoef * and Hans Risselada Department of Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Paviljoen 136, P.O. Box 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (J.v.D.); [email protected] (H.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-50-363-3686 Received: 29 February 2020; Accepted: 24 April 2020; Published: 3 May 2020 Abstract: In this research, we focus on the presumed negative effect of a sustainability claim on product quality. We propose that a brands’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) can reduce this negative effect. We conduct an experiment to test our hypotheses for a newly introduced detergent brand with an ecolabel vs. without one for high and low brand CSR levels. The experiment was conducted among 304 participants. Our results show that the ecolabel of the detergent can indeed trigger quality concerns. These quality concerns are reduced for brands high in CSR. This suggests that a brand’s sustained commitment to sustainability is important in overcoming negative effects of sustainability claims on product quality. Keywords: sustainability; corporate social responsibility; product quality 1. Introduction Within supermarkets, an increasing number of sustainable products can be observed (International Supermarket News 2015 [1]). Manufacturers and retailers aim to focus more on sustainability. The UK-Netherlands based multinational Unilever has for example introduced the Sustainable Living Plan to increase the number of sustainable ingredients in their brands [2]. Despite the increasing number of sustainable products and interest in sustainability among consumers, market share for sustainable products remain low (around 3% of the European Market; [3,4].
    [Show full text]
  • Why Neglected Tropical Diseases Matter in Reducing Poverty 1.42 MB
    July 2013 Working Paper 03 Why neglected tropical diseases matter in reducing poverty Fiona Samuels and Romina Rodríguez Pose • Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) have a direct impact on the achievement This and other Development of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Without addressing these Progress materials are available at Key diseases, the broader aim of poverty alleviation is unlikely to be achieved. developmentprogress.org messages • Straightforward and highly cost-effective strategies are available to control Development Progress is an ODI project and eventually eradicate or eliminate NTDs. that aims to measure, understand and communicate where and how progress • Success in controlling, eliminating or eradicating NTDs depends on has been made in development. partnerships between multiple constituencies that enable countries to adapt international guidelines to local contexts, integrate NTD programmes into ODI is the UK’s leading independent think tank on international development health systems and engage communities in implementation. and humanitarian issues. Further ODI materials are available at odi.org.uk Introduction indicators specific to them (Molyneux, 2008). While neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) One possible explanation for have been recognised for centuries – international disinterest is that NTDs indeed as ‘biblical plagues’ – NTDs have, almost exclusively affect the developing as the name implies, remained below the world (though this is also true for malaria) radar of most international and national and are not likely to spread far beyond; policy-makers. indeed, many NTDs have disappeared This relative neglect can be seen in completely in the developed world due examining the Millennium Development to improved hygiene and sanitation Goal (MDG) framework: while NTDs standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability As/In Culture and Design
    587 Unmaking Waste 2015 Conference Proceedings 22 – 24 May 2015 Adelaide, South Australia Sustainability as/in Culture and Design Session 19 Anti-consumerism. Contributions and paradoxes in the ‘sustainable turn’ in consumer culture – Juan SANIN Greening ‘The Block’: Sustainability in mainstream lifestyle TV – Aggeliki AGGELI and Gavin MELLES Dreaming sustainability, realising utopia: ‘convergence’ and ‘divergence’ in art and design practice – Robert HARLAND, Maria Cecilia LOSCHIAVO DOS SANTOS, Gillian WHITELEY 588 Unmaking Waste 2015 Conference Proceedings 22 – 24 May 2015 Adelaide, South Australia Anti-consumerism: Contributions and paradoxes in the ‘sustainable turn’ in consumer culture Juan SANIN RMIT University, Australia Industrial Design / Cultural Studies This paper examines three artefacts representative of anti-consumerism: the ‘Blackspot Unswoosher’, a shoe produced by the ‘Blackspot Anticorporation’ and publicised as the shoe that will reinvent capitalism; ‘Buy Nothing New Month’, a Melbourne-based initiative promoting a ‘more “custodial” valuing of possessions’ based on the premise of ‘old is the new new’; and ‘Buy Nothing Day’, an international day of protest against over-consumption that encourages consumers to advance sustainable causes through the slogan ‘participate by not participating’. In doing this, it aims to shed light on new approaches to sustainability emerging from consumer culture. These approaches, as the paper shows, advocate for a movement away from modern consumerism towards sustainable ways of consumption. The discussion of these artefacts draws on critical approaches to consumer culture and is framed by what I propose to call “the sustainable turn”. The literature suggests that from all the approaches to sustainability emerging from consumer culture, anti-consumerism appears to be the most radical and paradoxical.
    [Show full text]