The Science of Astrology: Schreibkalender, Natural Philosophy, and Everyday Life in the Seventeenth-Century German Lands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Science of Astrology: Schreibkalender, Natural Philosophy, and Everyday Life in the Seventeenth-Century German Lands The Science of Astrology: Schreibkalender, Natural Philosophy, and Everyday Life in the Seventeenth-Century German Lands A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History of the College of Arts and Sciences by Kelly Marie Smith M.A. University of Cincinnati, December 2003 B.S. Eastern Michigan University, December 2000 Committee Chair: Sigrun Haude, Ph.D. Abstract This dissertation explores the use of Schreibkalender, or writing-calendars, and their accompanying prognostica astrologica to evaluate how ideas about seventeenth-century natural philosophy – particularly the relationship between astronomy and astrology – changed throughout the period. These calendars contain a wealth of information that demonstrates the thirst early modern readers had for knowledge of the world around them. Because Schreibkalender and prognostica were written annually for the general populace and incorporated contemporary ideas regarding natural philosophy, they provide a means to assess the roles of both astronomical and astrological ideas during this period and how these changes were conveyed to the average person. Not only did authors present practical information related to the natural world, but they also explained basic philosophical principles and new discoveries to their audience. This research examines how changing ideas about the role of natural philosophy and its direct influence on everyday life developed over the course of the seventeenth century. An examination of the Schreibkalender and prognostica reveals a shift in emphasis throughout the period. Early calendars (approximately 1600-30) presented direct astronomical and astrological information related to the daily life of the average person, whereas those from the middle of the century (~1630-70) added helpful details explaining astronomical and astrological concepts. Authors also engaged in debates about new discoveries and methodologies in these calendars, which gave readers access to the dynamic and complex field of mid-century natural philosophy. Late-century (~1670-1700) calendar-makers continued the tradition of their predecessors, but they made fewer astrological predictions. Instead, they listed basic ii astronomical data – such as the locations of the planets or the phases of the moon – and added new subject matter that was still firmly rooted in readers’ practical needs. The calendars reveal a deep connection between people and the natural world. Meteorological forecasts and predictions about planting and harvesting crops enabled users to plan their days, months, and seasons. Authors also relied on major events like eclipses to make special predictions about the world around them. Portents like comets could also signify the possibility of increased warfare. Chapters on the prospect for war or peace, on the fruitfulness of the Earth, or the possibility for disease and epidemics also helped readers understand the events and calamities occurring around them. As the century progressed, however, authors adapted their calendars to include fewer predictions and instead focused on new topics like biblical stories, histories, or household tips. These accounts enabled the calendars to remain competitive with new media, such as newspapers or travel accounts, even as interest in astrology decreased. A thorough assessment of Schreibkalender and prognostica astrologica uncovers valuable information about how a general audience learned about and understood natural philosophy throughout the seventeenth century. Furthermore, this research provides a clearer understanding of the role that astronomy and astrology played within the development of the physical sciences. iii iv Acknowledgements I would first like to express my appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Sigrun Haude, for her constant support from the very first class. Her expertise and encouragement made it possible for me to learn and grow as a scholar. The countless hours she spent reading my work and meeting with me to discuss it improved my drafts exponentially. She provided valuable and thought- provoking insights and motivated me to strive continually to improve the quality of my work. Without her direction, I would not have been able to achieve my goal of completing this dissertation. Being Dr. Hilda Smith’s research assistant enabled me to pursue my doctorate. The knowledge I gained working on the Nation, Family, State project was invaluable and I am grateful for her assistance. Dr. Tracy Teslow’s coursework provided the inspiration and background information so I could write a dissertation on the history of science. I appreciate her guidance. I have long admired the scholarship of Dr. Gerhild Scholz Williams of Washington University in St. Louis and am honored she agreed to be on this committee. I would also like to thank my professors in the History Department, as well as Hope Earls, Ashley Bone, and Anita Swillinger. I first conducted my exploratory research at the Staatsarchiv Nürnberg where Ursula Schmidt-Fölkersamb found calendars to bring me every day. It was in Nuremberg where I first met Dr. Klaus-Dieter Herbst, whose work has uncovered thousands of Schreibkalender in archives throughout Germany. Dr. Herbst graciously volunteered to send me articles he had written and information about his research. He also invited me to publish a short description of my dissertation in one of his collections and to give a talk at a conference dedicated to Schreibkalender in November, 2011 in Altenburg, Germany. My conference paper in his edited v collection became my second publication. I am indebted to his support at this early stage in my career. The generous funding from the Rolf und Ursula Schneider-Stiftung at the Herzog August Bibliothek in Wolfenbüttel and a fellowship at the Institut für Europäische Geschichte in Mainz allowed me to spend time in Germany, where I was able to access my sources and conduct my research. I appreciate the advice and help from Dr. Jill Bepler, Dr. Volker Bauer, Herr Christian Hogrefe, Frau Gerlinde Strauß, and Dr. Cornelia Moore in Wolfenbüttel and Dr. Irene Dingel, Dr. Heinz Durchhardt, Dr. Johannes Wischmeyer, Dr. Henning Jürgens, Frau Ulrike Moritz, and Herr Winfried Koch in Mainz. I am fortunate that there were people and organizations who believed in my research and contributed the funding that was necessary to pursue it. The University of Cincinnati and the Department of History provided me not just with a Graduate Assistantship Award, but also the Charles Phelps Taft Graduate Enrichment Award, the Henry Winkler Scholarship, and financial support from the Werner E. Von Rosentiel Fund and the History Memorial Fund. I also received a scholarship from the German Academic Exchange Service so that I could travel to Marburg, Germany to spend the summer studying German. Last but not least, I am thankful for the unwavering support of my friends and family. My friends in Cincinnati, Wolfenbüttel, Mainz, and Marburg encouraged me and provided welcome distractions when necessary. My family – especially my mother, Rosemarie Delikta Smith and my brother and sister-in-law, Douglas and Erin Smith – has fostered my education since my earliest years. I am most grateful for their reassurances and confidence in me. This dissertation is dedicated to my mother and to the memories of my father, Ralph H. Smith, and grandmother, Veronika Delikta. vi Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………..………………………………………..ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………..v List of Figures………………………………………………………………………..….viii Chapter One: Introduction………………………………………………………….……..1 1.1 Terminology…………………………………………………………………...2 1.2 Literature on Astronomy and Astrology………………………………….……5 1.3 Literature on Calendars………………………………………………………..8 1.4 Schreibkalender and Prognostica Astrologica………………………….……17 1.5 Methodology and Chapter Outlines…………………………….……….……25 Chapter Two: Authorities, Evidence, and Audience………………………………..……28 2.1 Authors and their Resources………………………………………….………29 2.2 Reception of the Schreibkalender and Prognostica………….……………….51 2.3 Mediums of Information Transfer…………………………….……………...64 2.4 Conclusion…………………………………………………….……………...68 Chapter Three: Calendars, Weather, and Climate………………………..………………70 3.1 Practical Understandings of the Weather and Climate………..………………73 3.2 Interpretations of the Natural World………………………….……………....78 3.3 Planetary Tables…………………………………………………………...…93 3.4 Climate Change………………………………………………………….….109 3.5 Conclusion…………………………………………………….…………….125 Chapter Four: Early Modern Medicine in Schreibkalender and Prognostica…..……....128 4.1 Early Modern Medicine………………………………………….………….131 4.2 Iatromathematics in the Schreibkalender and Prognostica…………..……...139 4.3 Conclusion…………………………………………………………….….....157 Chapter Five: Schreibkalender, Society, Culture, and Religion……………..………….160 5.1 Religion and the Natural World………………………………….………….162 5.2 Apocalypticism…………………………………………………………..…167 5.3 War and Peace………………………………………………………………182 5.4 Education……………………………………………………….…………...191 5.5 Household Tips……………………………………………………….…..…197 5.6 Histories…………………………………………………………………….204 Chapter Six: Conclusion………………………………………………….…….………215 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………....221 vii List of Figures Figure 1: Listing for March in Expertus Rupertus Argutissimus’ 1686 Schreibkalender……....16 Figure 2: Page of Important Dates from Israel Hiebner’s 1656 Schreibkalender……………….19 Figure 3: Excerpt from
Recommended publications
  • The Holistic Hippocrates: 'Treating the Patient, Not Just the Disease'
    King, Helen. "The Holistic Hippocrates: ‘Treating the Patient, Not Just the Disease’." Hippocrates Now: The ‘Father of Medicine’ in the Internet Age. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. 133–154. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 24 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350005921.ch-007>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 24 September 2021, 04:27 UTC. Copyright © Helen King 2020. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 7 Th e Holistic Hippocrates: ‘Treating the Patient, N o t J u s t t h e D i s e a s e ’ I n t h i s fi nal chapter I want to look at the Hippocrates of today not through specifi c uses in news stories or in quotes, but through the invocation of his name in holistic (or, as we shall see, ‘wholistic’) medicine. Holism today presents itself as a return to a superior past, and brings Hippocrates in as part of this strategy. Th e model of the history of medicine implicit – or sometimes explicit – in holistic users of Hippocrates is one in which there was a golden age until ‘the turn away from holism in medicine allowed diseases to be located in specifi c organs, tissues or cells’.1 While there is something in this where ancient medicine is concerned, with its basis in fl uids rather than organs, this is of course also a tried and tested strategy for convincing an audience of the value of a ‘new’ thing: you claim it is ‘old’, or ancient, or just traditional.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies of Defending Astrology: a Continuing Tradition
    Strategies of Defending Astrology: A Continuing Tradition by Teri Gee A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Copyright by Teri Gee (2012) Strategies of Defending Astrology: A Continuing Tradition Teri Gee Doctorate of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto 2012 Abstract Astrology is a science which has had an uncertain status throughout its history, from its beginnings in Greco-Roman Antiquity to the medieval Islamic world and Christian Europe which led to frequent debates about its validity and what kind of a place it should have, if any, in various cultures. Written in the second century A.D., Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos is not the earliest surviving text on astrology. However, the complex defense given in the Tetrabiblos will be treated as an important starting point because it changed the way astrology would be justified in Christian and Muslim works and the influence Ptolemy’s presentation had on later works represents a continuation of the method introduced in the Tetrabiblos. Abû Ma‘shar’s Kitâb al- Madkhal al-kabîr ilâ ‘ilm ahk. âm al-nujûm, written in the ninth century, was the most thorough surviving defense from the Islamic world. Roger Bacon’s Opus maius, although not focused solely on advocating astrology, nevertheless, does contain a significant defense which has definite links to the works of both Abû Ma‘shar and Ptolemy. As such, he demonstrates another stage in the development of astrology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zodiac Man in Medieval Medical Astrology
    Quidditas Volume 3 Article 3 1982 The Zodiac Man in Medieval Medical Astrology Charles Clark University of Colorado Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Charles (1982) "The Zodiac Man in Medieval Medical Astrology," Quidditas: Vol. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol3/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Zodiac Man in Medieval Medical Astrology by Charles Clark University of Colorado A naked male figure was a familiar illustration in many medieval and Renaissance manuscripts. Standing with his legs and arms slightly spread, the twelve images or names of the zodiac were superimposed on his body, from his head (Aries) to his feet (Pisces). Used as a quick reference by physicians, barber-surgeons, and even laymen, the figure indicated the part of the body which was "ruled" by a specific sign of the zodiac. Once the correct sign was determined for the particular part of the body, the proper time for surgery, bloodletting, administration of medication, or even the cutting of hair and nails could be found. This depended, above all, upon the position of the moon in the heavens, since it was a medieval commonplace attributed to the astronomer Ptolemy (ca. 150 A.D.) that one touched neither with iron nor with medication the part of the body in whose zodical sign the moon was at that particular moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Geminos and Babylonian Astronomy
    Geminos and Babylonian astronomy J. M. Steele Introduction Geminos’ Introduction to the Phenomena is one of several introductions to astronomy written by Greek and Latin authors during the last couple of centuries bc and the first few centuries ad.1 Geminos’ work is unusual, however, in including some fairly detailed—and accurate—technical information about Babylonian astronomy, some of which is explicitly attributed to the “Chal- deans.” Indeed, before the rediscovery of cuneiform sources in the nineteenth century, Gem- inos provided the most detailed information on Babylonian astronomy available, aside from the reports of several eclipse and planetary observations quoted by Ptolemy in the Almagest. Early-modern histories of astronomy, those that did not simply quote fantastical accounts of pre-Greek astronomy based upon the Bible and Josephus, relied heavily upon Geminos for their discussion of Babylonian (or “Chaldean”) astronomy.2 What can be learnt of Babylonian astron- omy from Geminos is, of course, extremely limited and restricted to those topics which have a place in an introduction to astronomy as this discipline was understood in the Greek world. Thus, aspects of Babylonian astronomy which relate to the celestial sphere (e.g. the zodiac and the ris- ing times of the ecliptic), the luni-solar calendar (e.g. intercalation and the 19-year (“Metonic”) cycle), and lunar motion, are included, but Geminos tells us nothing about Babylonian planetary theory (the planets are only touched upon briefly by Geminos), predictive astronomy that uses planetary and lunar periods, observational astronomy, or the problem of lunar visibility, which formed major parts of Babylonian astronomical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Elective Astrology - Timing Medical Procedures
    13 13 Welcome to the 13th GATE, the domain of Ophiuchus the 13th Sign, Hygeia the Goddess of Health and Chiron the Wounded Healer. This realm is governed by the healing powers of the Universe. It is the place to come to be restored. SELECTIONS: Stellar Healing, Cosmic Apothecary, Crystal Therapy Primer, Healing with Hygeia, Chiron and Ophiuchus. __________________________________________________________________ STELLAR HEALING Holistic Astrology and Astral-Geo Therapy STARLOGIC ASTRODYNAMICS AND STELLAR HEALING A question often posed by a client is, “What does my chart reveal about my health?” Health Astrology is a sub division of Medical Astrology that embraces a homeopathic and holistic view. An individual natal chart reveals certain predisposition for “dis-ease” that has the propensity to develop over a lifetime. Environmental factors, improper diet, or simply a lack of knowledge regarding possible deficiencies can all contribute to the onset of health problems. A natal chart actually yields a nutritional plan specific to the native by indicating the need for minerals and vitamins that can be beneficially instrumental in maintaining a healthy body. The association between bodily illness and the signs and planets of the Zodiac belong to the Hermetic Theory which is an ancient Egyptian/Greek philosophical science. Hermetic Theory is based on the premise that the entire Cosmos is reflected in each human being. In this system, the signs and degrees of the Zodiac correlate to human anatomy and the planets to the physical and chemical processes and to specific organ malfunction and vitamin and mineral deficiencies. The Uranian planets, Hades, Admetos, Appollon, and applicable Fixed Stars are also used in analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER SCHOOL 16Th – 23Rd August 2013 ~ Exeter College, Oxford
    SUMMER SCHOOL 16th – 23rd August 2013 ~ Exeter College, Oxford Guest Tutors: Bernadette Brady | Nicholas Campion | Geoffrey Cornelius Darby Costello | Maggie Hyde | Karen Parham | Melanie Reinhart | Sue Tompkins Faculty Tutors: Laura Andrikopoulos | Cat Cox | Penny De Abreu | Kim Farley Deborah Morgan | Glòria Roca | Carole Taylor | Dragana Van de Moortel-Ilić | Polly Wallace Raising the standard of astrological education since 1948 THE FACULTY’S ANNUAL SUMMER SCHOOL The Faculty’s annual Summer School is one of the world’s best-known astrological events, attracting students from many countries to the beautiful city of Oxford to enjoy the weekend and five-day courses. The programme caters for a range of levels, from relative beginners through to students and practitioners at advanced or professional level. With our world class team of experienced guest tutors providing an exciting and dynamic programme of study, Summer School offers you a chance to work in depth with astrology, developing knowledge of new subjects and techniques, and deepening your understanding of existing ones. The Faculty will do its very best to make you feel welcome and at home. Our conference team ensures the smooth running of the School, leaving you free to sit back and enjoy the astrology, community atmosphere and the beauty of Exeter College. EXETER COLLEGE Exeter College was founded in 1314 and stands in the heart of Oxford near to the Bodleian Library. The oldest part of the college dates to 1432, with other buildings added in the 17th and 18th centuries, including the Gothic chapel with its magnificent stained glass and a stunning Jacobean dining hall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oriental Institute 2013–2014 Annual Report Oi.Uchicago.Edu
    oi.uchicago.edu The OrienTal insTiTuTe 2013–2014 annual repOrT oi.uchicago.edu © 2014 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2014. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago ISBN: 978-1-61491-025-1 Editor: Gil J. Stein Production facilitated by Editorial Assistants Muhammad Bah and Jalissa Barnslater-Hauck Cover illustration: Modern cylinder seal impression showing a presentation scene with the goddesses Ninishkun and Inana/Ishtar from cylinder seal OIM A27903. Stone. Akkadian period, ca. 2330–2150 bc. Purchased in New York, 1947. 4.2 × 2.5 cm The pages that divide the sections of this year’s report feature various cylinder and stamp seals and sealings from different places and periods. Printed by King Printing Company, Inc., Winfield, Illinois, U.S.A. Overleaf: Modern cylinder seal impression showing a presentation scene with the goddesses Ninishkun and Inana/Ishtar; and (above) black stone cylinder seal with modern impression. Akkadian period, ca. 2330–2150 bc. Purchased in New York, 1947. 4.2 × 2.5 cm. OIM A27903. D. 000133. Photos by Anna Ressman oi.uchicago.edu contents contents inTrOducTiOn introduction. Gil J. Stein........................................................... 5 research Project rePorts Achemenet. Jack Green and Matthew W. Stolper ............................................... 9 Ambroyi Village. Frina Babayan, Kathryn Franklin, and Tasha Vorderstrasse ....................... 12 Çadır Höyük. Gregory McMahon ........................................................... 22 Center for Ancient Middle Eastern Landscapes (CAMEL). Scott Branting ..................... 27 Chicago Demotic Dictionary (CDD). François Gaudard and Janet H. Johnson . 33 Chicago Hittite and Electronic Hittite Dictionary (CHD and eCHD). Theo van den Hout ....... 35 Eastern Badia. Yorke Rowan.............................................................. 37 Epigraphic Survey. W. Raymond Johnson ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Nova Stella and Its Observers
    Running title: Nova stella 1572 AD The Nova Stella and its Observers P. Ruiz–Lapuente ∗,∗∗ 1. Introduction In 1572, physicists were still living with the concepts of mechanics inherited from Aris- totle and with the classification of the elements from the Greek philosopher. The growing criticism towards the Aristotelian views on the natural world could not turn very produc- tive, because the necessary elements of calculus and the empirical tools to move into a better frame were still lacking. However, in astronomy, observers had witnessed by that time the comet of 1556 and they would witness a new one in 1577. Moreover, since 1543 when De Revolutionibus Orbium Caelestium by Copernicus came to light, the apparent motion of the planets had a radically different explanation from the ortodox geocentrism. The new helio- centric view slowly won supporters among astronomers. The explanations concerning the planetary motions would depart from the “common sense” intuitions that had placed the earth sitting still at the center of the planetary system. Thus the “nova stella” in 1572 happened in the middle of the geocentric–versus–heliocentric debate. The other “nova”, the one that would be observed in 1604 by Kepler, came just shortly after the posthumous publication of Tycho Brahe’s Astronomiae Instauratae Progymnasmata1 which contains most of the debates in relation to the appearance of the “new star”2. arXiv:astro-ph/0502399v1 21 Feb 2005 The machinery moving the planetary spheres, i.e. the intrincate system of solid spheres rotating by the motion imparted to them as the wheels in a clock, was not directly affected by the new heliocentric proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Academic Genealogy of Swapnil Haria
    �� John Mauropus, ���-���� �� Johannes VIII Xiphilinus, ����-���� �� Nicetas Byzantius The Academic University of Constantinople University of Constantinople, ���� | Patriarch of Constantinople �� Michael Psellos, ����-���� University of Constantinople Genealogy of �� John Italus, ����-���� University of Constantinople �� Theodore of Smyrna Swapnil Haria University of Constantinople �� Michael Italikos, c. ���� �� Stephanos Skylitzes Philippolis Trebizond | Constantinople, ���� Academic ancestors include two saints, Copernicus, Erasmus, and Leibniz. This �� Theodoros Prodromos, ����-���� Patriarch school, Constantinople geneology almost certainly contains errors and omissions. Information compiled �� Demetrios Karykes Smyrna, ���� from/by Mathematics Genealogy Project, �� Theodorus Exapterigus �� Nicephorus Blemmydes, ����-���� Neurotree, Nikos Hardavellas, Mark D. Hill, Prusa, Nicea | Smyrna, Scamander | Monastery of Ephesus Timothy Sherwood, and Gio Wiederhold. �� Georgius Acropolitus, ����-���� Nicae �� Georgius Pachymeres, ����-���� Constantinople �� Manual Byrennius, ����-XXXX Constantinople �� Theodore Metochites, ����-���� Nicea �� Elder St. Nicodemus of Vatopedi �� Nicephorus Gregoras, ����-���� �� Manuel Holobolos Vatopedi Monastery, Mt. Athos, ��XX Constantinople Rhetor at the court of Nicae, ���� �� St. Gregory Palamas, ����-���� �� Simon of Constantinople, ����-���� Constantinople | Vatopedi Monastery, Mt. Athos | Thessaloniki Pera near Contantinople �� Nilus Cabasilas, ����-���� �� Philip of Pera (Philippo de Bindo Incontri)
    [Show full text]
  • COSMIC ASTROLOGY: the BOOK of ANSWERS Chapters I & II
    COSMIC ASTROLOGY: THE BOOK OF ANSWERS Chapters I & II Cosmic Astrology: The Book of Answers Copyright © 2014 The Oracle's Library All rights reserved. cosmicastrologythebookofanswers.com theoracleslibrary.com I. Introduction to Astrology What is astrology? Astrology is the ancient practice that seeks to interpret the relationship between the cosmos and life on Earth. At a glance, the planets and stars seem such arbitrary objects that shift like clockwork in the sky. In the present day, the stars have faded into the background—dimmed as the backdrop behind the glare of city lights, so that we neglect to look up at their beauty in awestruck wonder. And so, we have not yet come to the realization that there are forces that exist outside this world much greater than the sheltered surface upon which we live. It seems more common in this day and age that we struggle to find significance in memorizing star patterns or simply pointing out the constellations in the night sky. We neglect the practice altogether, and throw it off as some form of over indulgence for amateur astronomers and crazed astrologers elated with lunacy. But with a closer observation of the planets and stars, the patterns of existence and interactions between take the shape of a divine melody, and with these patterns, we begin to unlock the beat of the drum in which chaos parades about the universe. THE BOOK OF ANSWERS So what does astrology mean for us humans? From horoscopes to natal charts, astrologers have tried to make use of the zodiac signs and planetary information they collect from the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrological Birth Chart Prepared For: Allen September 22, 1949, 95W23, 29N45
    Astrological Birth Chart Prepared for: Allen September 22, 1949, 95w23, 29n45 Click here to visit InteractiveStars.com Page 1 of 13 Allen September 22, 1949, 95w23, 29n45 The most powerful astrological aspect - for better or for worse! A conjunction describes a very important character trait. A major aspect. Can show incompatibility between two facets of a person's character. Can also show breadth of vision in that area of life. Two planets at right angles to one another can show character traits that are at odds with one another. Can also be a spur for action, growth and change. Two planets a third of the 360 circle apart show an easy, flowing relationship between two aspects of a person's character. Two planets one sixth of the 360 circle apart is similar to a Trine - easy and harmonious - but not as powerful. Two planets five twelfths of the 360 circle apart show character traits that are contradictory and not at ease with one another. Page 2 of 13 Introduction A Natal Chart is a snap shot of the Sun, Moon, stars and planets in the heavens on the day that you were born. But even if you are not sure what time of day you were born, just knowing the date and year reveals an enormous amount about you. The way the Sun and planets interact with one another, and the zodiac signs they fall in, still form a unique pattern, which reveals many of the different aspects of your personality and true potential. To find out what's missing from your Natal Chart and Natal Horoscope Report when you don't know your time and place of birth, please see the end of this introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus' First Friends: Physical Copernicanism
    Filozofski vestnik Volume/Letnik XXV • Number/Številka 2 • 2004 • 143–166 COPERNICUS’ FIRST FRIENDS: PHYSICAL COPERNICANISM FROM 1543 TO 1610 Katherine A. Tredwell and Peter Barker Early assessments of the Copernican Revolution were hampered by the failure to understand the nature of astronomy in the sixteenth century, as scholars took statements made in praise of Copernicus to be implicit endorsements of his heliocentric cosmology. Gradually this view has been supplanted by the ac- knowledgement that many supposed partisans of Copernicus only endorsed the use of his astronomical models for the calculation of apparent planetary positions, while rejecting or remaining silent on the reality of heliocentrism. A classic example of this shift in historiography concerns Erasmus Reinhold (1511–1553), a professor of mathematics at the University of Wittenberg. Re- inhold’s use of Copernican models in his Prutenic Tables (Tabulae prutenicae, 1551) has led to the mistaken belief that he sanctioned a Sun-centered cos- mology as well. Careful reassessment of his published writings has revealed that he commended certain aspects of Copernicus’ work, such as the elimi- nation of the equant, but showed no interest in heliocentrism (Westman, 1975: pp. 174–178). Other supposed Copernicans, such as Robert Recorde (c. 1510–1558), expressed some openness to the Earth’s motion but left no clear indication of what they thought to be the true system of the world (Rus- sell, 1972: pp. 189–191). Between the publication of Copernicus’ epoch-making book On the Revo- lutions of the Celestial Orbs (De revolutionibus orbium coelestium) in 1543 and the year 1610, only a handful of individuals can be identified with certainty as Copernicans, in the sense that they considered heliocentrism to be physically real and not merely a calculational convenience.
    [Show full text]