sign in sign up
<<
Home , Belatacept, Glatiramer acetate, Siponimod

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Review Approved and Emerging Disease Modifying Therapies on Neurodegeneration in

Madeline Bross, Melody Hackett and Evanthia Bernitsas *

Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (M.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]

 Received: 23 May 2020; Accepted: 15 June 2020; Published: 17 June 2020 

Abstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, chronic, progressive disease leading to a combination of inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration throughout the (CNS). The outcome of these processes can be visualized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans as brain atrophy, or brain volume loss (BVL), as well as lesions, “black holes” and spinal cord atrophy. MRI outcomes such as BVL have been used as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and other measures of MS disease progression in clinical research settings. Several FDA-approved seek to alleviate disease progression by reducing the impact of such factors as demyelination and neurodegeneration, but there are still many shortcomings that current clinical research aims to mitigate. This review attempts to provide an overview of the FDA-approved medications available for treating multiple sclerosis and their effect on neurodegeneration, measured by BVL.

Keywords: neurodegeneration; multiple sclerosis; disease modifying therapies; brain atrophy; demyelination

1. Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating and degenerative immune-mediated condition of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by a wide spectrum of disease evolution, from focal inflammation to neuronal death, axonal and loss, and failure of CNS repair mechanisms to restore the damage [1]. These underlying mechanisms result in various MS symptoms, consisting of muscle weakness, , imbalance, and increased ambulatory difficulty [2]. Brain atrophy, or brain volume loss (BVL), may be present in early stages of MS. BVL becomes more prominent in progressive stages and has been used as a biomarker for neurodegeneration [3]. Brain atrophy can be visualized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and is being used as a measure of disease progression in MS, mainly in clinical research and not as a part of routine clinical practice [4,5]. It is well established that the rate of BVL occurs faster in MS patients than in healthy individuals. In MS, BVL is estimated to be between 0.5% and 1.35% per year, with an average of 0.7% per year, compared to 0.2% to 0.4% in age-matched healthy controls [6,7]. Brain atrophy presents in early stages of MS and is associated with physical and cognitive disability [8]. While in most cases increased BVL or a high rate of BVL can indicate a poor prognosis, it is difficult to generalize all such instances under the same trend [9]. Several studies have used other imaging biomarkers for axonal loss, such as thalamic volume, gray matter fraction, corpus callosum area, “black holes,” and spinal cord atrophy to predict the course of the disease as is seen using clinical measures [3,10,11]. However, BVL is the preferred biomarker to assess neurodegeneration and even though its use has not been implemented in common clinical practice, it is used mainly in the research

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312; doi:10.3390/ijms21124312 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 2 of 15 setting. Some of the currently available treatment options aim to manipulate this pro-inflammatory response by targeting the cells responsible for mediating these mechanisms [12]. It is hypothesized that prior inflammation makes it more likely for demyelination and neurodegeneration to then occur [13].

2. Inflammation Inflammation is more prominent in the early stages of MS and occurs when activated microglia and macrophages target specific cell types in the CNS, destroying oligodendrocytes and leading to demyelination of axons [14]. The role of T- and B- is critical in the inflammatory process. MS was thought to be mainly a T-cell disease, as the pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes were found within the brain and active plaques in people with MS. These types of cells are sequestered within lymph nodes under fingolimod treatment and in the peripheral blood after treatment with . More recently the role of B-lymphocytes was investigated and found to be prominent. B-lymphocytes produce autoantibodies, increase secretion of pro-inflammatory , and decrease production of regulatory cytokines; all these factors promote and perpetuate inflammation. Inflammatory lesions in the brain and spinal cord can be visualized by imaging modalities such as MRI scans with contrast during the relapses seen in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) [15]. Consequently, because of experiencing relapses, patients with RRMS and active secondary progressive MS (SPMS) phenotypes tend to have more enhancing lesions indicating active disease, and higher degrees of inflammation than primary progressive (PPMS) patients [16]. Inflammation may cause axonal injury and loss and contribute to BVL early in the disease process [17]. Relapses are often associated with the development of new lesions and/or growth of currently existing white and gray matter lesions [18]. Inactive lesions in the CNS are also visualized utilizing MRI in MS patients. The number of inactive lesions tends to increase over the course of the disease when remyelination of the affected area does not occur [15].

3. Demyelination Neuroinflammation is the underlying mechanism of demyelinating lesions [19]. Demyelinating lesions with partial preservation of axons is a typical injury seen in MS [10]. The formation of these lesions often activates demyelinating mechanisms where target and attack a specific or cell type [20]. One of the cell types destroyed are oligodendrocytes, which are responsible for maintaining the myelin sheath surrounding axons and providing nutrients to the neurons [21]. The loss of these cells makes the neurons more susceptible to inflammatory processes and contributes to more myelin damage and loss [22]. The damage to the myelin sheath interferes with normal message transmission. This diminished transmission ability may account for the clinical presentation of MS as well as the severity of the symptoms [23].

4. Neurodegeneration: Axonal Injury and Loss Inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration are certainly linked; however, a causal relation between them is still unclear [24]. It has been found that in active lesions, the level of reactive oxygen species tends to be higher, often leading to oxidative damage and subsequent cell injury [20]. After the loss of the protective myelin sheath, demyelinated axons are thought to become more vulnerable and therefore more likely to sustain cellular damage by pro-inflammatory processes [22]. Neurodegeneration is a complex process where different molecular mechanisms can occur in combination. After the death of oligodendrocytes during active inflammation and the release of iron from them, other mechanisms, such as microglia activation resulting in increased production of free radicals (nitric oxide and glutamate excitotoxicity), and mitochondrial dysfunction may amplify the oxidative injury and lead to worsening neurodegeneration [25,26]. Although primary injury to the axons is the main reason for axonal loss, axons may die in areas far from the lesion due to lack of pre and post-synaptic signals (dying back and Wallerian axonal degeneration). In neurodegeneration and progressive MS, the role of B-lymphocytes appears to be more important than previously accepted, as , a B-cell depleting disease modifying treatment might affect this process [26–28]. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 3 of 15

Diffuse axonal injury of the normally appearing white and gray matter is a hallmark of progressive forms. Similarly, cortical demyelination, sometimes associated with the presence of B-cell rich ectopic meningeal lymphoid aggregates, may be present early in the disease, but becomes more pronounced in the progressive stages, resulting in irreversible damage [29,30].

5. MS Therapies Regular clinical assessments and MRI scans are the most common way to track MS disease progression. Maintaining records of these measures is also important to determine if and to what extent a disease modifying therapy (DMT) is effectively treating a patient’s MS. A variety of DMTs are currently available via a few different routes of administration (oral, injectable, infusion) for patients with MS. Although it is difficult to generalize a treatment’s true benefits or drawbacks across all patients. A summary table of the available treatment options can be seen in Table1 below.

Table 1. Mechanism of action of FDA-approved DMT.

DMT Commercial Name Approved Indication Proposed Mechanism (If Available) Route of Administration Tecfidera CIS, relapsing MS Changes balance by inhibiting NrF2 Oral Gilenya CIS, relapsing MS -1-phosphate Oral CIS, relapsing MS Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator Mayzent Oral (including active SPMS) (1 and 5) Mitochondrial dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase Teriflunomide Aubagio CIS, RRMS Oral (DHODH) inhibitor Relapsing MS (including Synthetic deoxyadenosine analogue, long Mavenclad Oral active SPMS) lasting depletion Copaxone CIS, RRMS Promotes anti-inflammatory response Injectable (GA) Avonex, Rebif, Changes cytokine balance, favors Plegridy, Betaseron, CIS, RRMS Injectable anti-inflammatory cytokines Betaferon, Extavia Monoclonal , anti-CD52, long lasting Lemtrada Aggressive RRMS Infusion lymphocyte depletion Aggressive RRMS, Immunosuppressant (type II topoisomerase Novantrone Infusion (every 3 months) SPMS, and PRMS inhibitor) ; limits Natalizumab Tysabri RRMS Infusion (every month) transmigration through the blood brain barrier Monoclonal antibody, anti-CD20, Ocrelizumab Ocrevus RRMS and PPMS Infusion depletes B cells PPMS: primary progressive MS, SPMS: secondary progressive MS, PRMS: progressive relapsing MS, RRMS: relapsing remitting MS, CIS: clinically isolated syndrome, DMT: disease modifying treatment

6. Oral Disease Modifying Therapies

6.1. Dimethyl Fumarate Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), available commercially as Tecfidera, is FDA-approved to treat relapsing forms of MS (including clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), RRMS, and relapsing forms of secondary progressive MS (SPMS)). Dimethyl fumarate is taken orally and requires gradual dose elevation to reach the appropriate treatment dosage. In clinical studies, it has been observed that it activates a pathway which produces cytoprotective and thereby blocking oxidative processes against the cells [31]. In clinical studies (DEFINE [32] and CONFIRM [33]), it was observed that there was a statistically significant reduction in brain lesion development from the six- month time point until the end of the two-year study. Similarly, fewer gadolinium-enhancing lesions and T1-hypointense lesions formed in that time [32,33]. While in the DEFINE phase 3 there was a significant decrease of brain atrophy from the baseline to 2 years and from month 6 to 2 years [32], reduction in brain atrophy in the CONFIRM did not reach significance [33]. The currently known side effects of dimethyl fumarate include flushing, abdominal , diarrhea, and nausea [34]. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 4 of 15

6.2. Fingolimod Fingolimod (FTY), known commercially as Gilenya, is an FDA-approved DMT for CIS and relapsing MS. It is an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator which subsequently allows it to alter circulating lymphocyte cell groups [35]. In three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials (FREEDOMS [36], FREEDOMS II [37], and TRANSFORMS [38]), fingolimod reduced the rate of BVL significantly and consistently compared to either placebo or IM beta-1a [39]. Focusing on gray matter Bajrami, et al., showed a favorable effect of fingolimod on the diffuse and local gray matter (thalamus, basal ganglia) over a 2-year period [40]. Interestingly, these results were not reproduced in the INFORMS trial, suggesting that fingolimod has little effect on the pathogenetic mechanisms that lead to BVL and neurodegeneration in PPMS patients, and confirming the different causative and triggering factors behind pathogenesis in RRMS and PPMS [41]. Further observations showed higher BVL in PPMS patients and was associated with a higher EDSS and worsening disability [41,42]. Since there is an increased risk of macular edema and skin cancer with fingolimod treatments, regular check-ins with ophthalmologists and dermatologists are highly suggested [35].

6.3. Siponimod Siponimod, commercially known as Mayzent, is FDA-approved for CIS, RRMS, and active SPMS patients. It is an oral, selective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) 1 and 5 modulator and its structure allows it to easily cross the blood-brain barrier. In the EXPAND clinical trial, there was a significant reduction in brain volume loss in patients on siponimod compared to placebo, consistent during the 24-month duration of the study. As brain atrophy indicates permanent tissue damage, slowing the rate of brain volume loss can be a strong indicator of decreasing the rate of disease progression in SPMS [43]. Some of the currently known risks of taking siponimod are elevated liver transaminase concentrations, bradycardia, macular edema, , varicella-zoster virus reactivation, and convulsions. Many of these observed adverse effects are consistent with the side effects listed in safety reports of other approved S1P medications [44].

6.4. Teriflunomide Teriflunomide, commercially known as Aubagio, is FDA-approved for CIS and RRMS patients. Its mechanism of action involves inhibition of mitochondrial dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), leading to reduced synthesis of pyrimidine, a necessary component for the proliferation of growing lymphocytes. The lack of DHODH due to teriflunomide, therefore, has a limiting effect on the action of lymphocytes against the nervous system [45]. This mechanism indicates that teriflunomide has a greater direct effect on the immune system rather than the central nervous system [46]. In mouse models, the administration of teriflunomide appeared to be linked with less microstructural damage and lower glutamate levels, which suggests decreased inflammation. The investigators point out that while these outcomes were observed in laboratory research, it may be more difficult to reproduce the same observations in a clinical setting [47]. In the initial analysis, in CIS (TOPIC [46] trial) and RRMS (TEMSO [48] trial), teriflunomide failed to show a significant effect on BVL compared to placebo. However, a posthoc analysis of the phase III TEMSO showed a beneficial effect of teriflunomide 14 mg on white matter tissue loss [49]. A re-analysis of the phase III TEMSO MRI data showed a significant reduction of BVL versus placebo over a 2-year treatment period [50]. Teriflunomide has been found to be safe and tolerable, but side effects may include hair loss or thinning, an increase in liver enzymes, and increased blood pressure, which should be monitored closely [51].

6.5. Cladribine Cladribine (Mavenclad) is FDA-approved to treat RRMS and active SPMS patients. Cladribine is a synthetic deoxyadenosine analog, which interferes with lymphocyte production by inhibiting both B- Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 5 of 15 and T-cell proliferation. Some studies have emphasized its action on T cells more, but its currently accepted mechanism of action involves its depletion of lymphocytes in the body [52]. The data about the effect of cladribine on brain atrophy are controversial [53]. After trying different doses in a large cohort of patients, Filippi, et al., found no significant treatment effect of either dose of cladribine on BVL over time [54]. However, in the CLARITY multicenter trial, there was a statistically significant annualized BVL reduction with cladribine administration in RRMS compared to placebo between months 6 and 24 [55]. Due to the long-lasting immunosuppressive effect of cladribine, lymphopenia is a known risk of its long-term use [56]. Other studies are still being conducted to better determine the effects of cladribine and the development of other types of malignancies.

7. Injectable Disease Modifying Therapies

7.1. Glatiramer Acetate (GA) Glatiramer acetate, commercially known as Copaxone, is an FDA-approved injectable DMT for RRMS. Copaxone has demonstrated both tolerability and clinical maintenance of MS with long-term administration [57]. Its mechanism of action is complex. It is currently thought that GA acts by inhibiting myelin-specific T cells, most likely occurring at the periphery near injection sites or neighboring lymph node regions [58]. Ziemssen, et al. observed that administration of GA may be linked to increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) production, allowing GA-specific activated T cells to have a greater neuroprotective effect in the nervous system. In trials, patients who were administered glatiramer acetate had significantly reduced the cumulative number of new T2-weighted lesions [59]. The effect of glatiramer acetate on brain atrophy is controversial. Whilst data from the extended, open-label follow-up of the US trial [60] seem to indicate that long-term treatment with GA might prevent the loss of brain parenchyma in relapsing-remitting MS patients, longitudinal data from the European-Canadian MRI trial [61] suggest that, over a short-term period of treatment, GA does not have a clear-cut impact on the decrease of brain volume. However, a delayed effect is likely [61]. Crescenzo, et al., showed a possible favorable effect of GA on gray matter, either by reducing the accumulation of cortical lesions and/or slowing down the progression of gray matter atrophy [62].

7.2. Interferons Two types of interferon medications are available: interferon-beta 1a and interferon-beta 1b. Interferon-beta 1a types include medications commercially known as Avonex, Rebif, and Plegridy. Betaseron, Betaferon, and Extavia are the most common types of interferon-beta 1b. Both types of interferons are thought to act on T cells, but the cytokines they target differ, allowing for different cell cascades to be altered [63]. One study which examined the effect of subcutaneous interferon beta-1b (Betaseron) on MRI outcomes did not demonstrate any significant changes in brain atrophy in the treated group compared to placebo. In subgroup analysis, it was found that patients with more gadolinium-enhancing lesions tended to also have higher cerebral volume loss than patients whose baseline MRI showed non-active lesions, suggesting that higher inflammation contributes to the loss of brain tissue [64]. Another study observed some slowing in brain volume loss in patients on intramuscular interferon beta-1a (Avonex), but only after the second year of interferon administration [65]. In clinical trials, administration of interferons was associated with increased risks of humoral-mediated autoimmune or allergy conditions were observed, requiring more stringent monitoring [63].

8. Infusions

8.1. Alemtuzumab Alemtuzumab, available as Lemtrada, is FDA-approved for aggressive RRMS patients. It is a monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody which depletes both T- and B-lymphocyte counts in the body, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 6 of 15 followed by their reconstitution [66]. Clinical studies with alemtuzumab have shown favorable MRI outcomes, maintaining low levels of BVL throughout the 5-year study period, even though most patients only received within the 2-year period. In CARE-MS, it was found that alemtuzumab significantly decreased the rate of BVL in RRMS patients in both year 1, year 2, and throughout the whole study period compared to subcutaneous interferon beta-1a [67,68]. In CARE-MS II, for RRMS with first-line treatment-refractory disease, decreased BVL was observed in year 1, year 2, and throughout the entire study period; however, the results were statistically significant only over the first two years of the study period [69]. In the CARE-MS II 5-year follow-up study, annualized BVL rate continued to decrease in year 3 compared to the core study and remained low in years 4 and 5 [70]. Development of autoimmune diseases, such as Hashimoto thyroiditis and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), were observed risks in patients taking alemtuzumab [71].

8.2. Mitoxantrone Mitoxantrone, commercially known as Novantrone, is FDA-approved as an infusion treatment for aggressive RRMS, SPMS, and PRMS. It is administered every three months. It acts as a powerful immunosuppressive agent by targeting macrophages, B lymphocytes, and T lymphocytes. A precise mechanism is still to be determined, but it is thought that mitoxantrone induces apoptosis of B lymphocytes to then lower the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [72]. Although brain atrophy data are not available, mitoxantrone has a favorable effect on the development of gadolinium-enhancing and T2 lesions. In one study, MRI measures for both RRMS and SPMS suggest that long-term use of mitoxantrone is effective in reducing inflammation and overall disease activity in the brain. The imaging outcomes appeared to coincide with clinical outcomes of reduced relapse rates, but EDSS score worsened in 1/5 patients at year 3 during follow up The investigators emphasize that clinical outcomes do not always mirror radiological outcomes in every case, though imaging measures can sometimes be used to predict disease progression [73]. Observed risks of mitoxantrone include systolic cardiac dysfunction and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [74].

8.3. Natalizumab Natalizumab, commercially available as Tysabri, is FDA-approved to treat RRMS patients as a monthly infusion. Natalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets specific subunits on lymphocyte surfaces. It does not, however, appear to alter regulatory T-cell functioning, which is often seen with many other MS treatment options. As a result, fewer new enhancing lesions were observed after one month of treatment, demonstrating its promise in clinical settings [75]. Several studies showed a favorable effect of natalizumab on brain atrophy. In two pivotal clinical trials, the rate of BVL increased in the first year of treatment and then significantly decreased [76,77]. Several post-marketing trials demonstrated a beneficial effect on brain atrophy and cognition and showed the effect on BVL that occurred in the first year of treatment represents the “pseudoatrophy phenomenon,” and is mainly due to white matter changes related to natalizumab’s anti-inflammatory activity [78,79]. In a 5-year prospective study, Zivadinov, et al., demonstrated a significant reduction of BVL, not associated with the number of natalizumab infusions. Patients who received continuous monthly natalizumab infusions showed less BVL than patients who discontinued or stopped and restarted treatments [80]. In another placebo-controlled study, it was observed that in patients on natalizumab, fewer Gd+ lesions were converting to T1 hypointense lesions than the placebo group, possibly as a result of reduced lymphocyte migration and lower measures of axonal damage [81]. Long-term use of natalizumab can lead to a higher risk of developing PML or other opportunistic infections, such as urinary tract infections. Upon the first administration of natalizumab, it is also possible that there is an allergic reaction or signs of rejection by the patient [82]. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 14 received continuous monthly natalizumab infusions showed less BVL than patients who discontinued or stopped and restarted treatments [80]. In another placebo-controlled study, it was observed that in patients on natalizumab, fewer Gd+ lesions were converting to T1 hypointense lesions than the placebo group, possibly as a result of reduced lymphocyte migration and lower measures of axonal damage [81]. Long-term use of natalizumab can lead to a higher risk of developing PML or other opportunistic infections, such as urinary tract infections. Upon the first Int.administration J. Mol. Sci. 2020 of, 21 natalizumab,, 4312 it is also possible that there is an allergic reaction or signs of rejection7 of 15 by the patient [82].

8.4. Ocrelizumab Ocrelizumab, commercially known as Ocrevus, is one of the more recently approved infusion treatments available for both both RRMS RRMS and and PPMS PPMS patients. patients. Ocrelizumab is a monoclonal monoclonal anti-CD20 anti-CD20 antibody that that targets targets B cells, B cells, one oneof the of first the of first its kind of its to alter kind B to lymphocytes alter B lymphocytes rather than T rather lymphocytes. than T Inlymphocytes. as early as phase In as 2early trials, as it phase was observed 2 trials, thatit was the observed administration that the of ocrelizumabadministration appeared of ocrelizumab to reduce bothappeared MRI to and reduce clinical both disease MRI and progression clinical disease [83]. Another progression clinical [83] study. Another observed clinical a reduction study observed in the numbera reduction of newin the T2 number lesions of as new well T2 as lesions newly as enlarging well as newly T2 lesions enlarging in subjects T2 lesions receiving in subjects ocrelizumab receiving comparedocrelizumab to placebo, compared indicating to placebo, reduced indicating levels of reduced neural inflammation levels of neural [84 ]. inflammation In the ORATORIO [84]. In study, the BVLORATORIO was significantly study, BVL lower was in significantly PPMS patients lower on ocrelizumabin PPMS patients from weekon ocrelizumab 24 to week from 120 compared week 24 to patientsweek 120 on compared placebo [ 85to]. patients Results on from placebo the OPERA [85]. Results I and OPERA from the II trialsOPERA for I RRMS and OPERA patients II showed trials for a significantRRMS patients protective showed eff ecta significant on BVL in protective the ocrelizumab effect on group BVL rather in the than ocrelizumab the interferon group beta-1a rather group than inthe the interferon OPERA beta I trial,-1a butgroup not in in the the OPERA OPERA I II trial, [86]. but The not most in the common OPERA side II [86] effects. The include most common infusion reactionsside effects and include an increased infusion risk reactions for developing and an increased opportunistic risk for infections developing such opportunistic as UTIs or respiratory infections infectionssuch as UTIs [83 ].or respiratory infections [83]. Overall, thethe eeffectffect ofof approvedapproved DMTDMT isis summarizedsummarized inin FigureFigure1 1..

• Oral DMT • Oral DMT

FTY: protective on BVL & local GM in RRMS, not in PPMS (FREEDOMS I, II, SIP:protective on BVL in TRANSFORMS) SPMS (EXPAND) TER:protectiive on BVL & CLAD:controversial, WML (TEMSO meta-analysis) protective on BVL in RRMS (CLARITY multicenter) DMF:protective on BVL in RRMS(DEFINE, CONFIRM))

OCR: protective effect on BVL in RRMS and PPMS GA: controversial, might (ORATORIO, OPERA i) protect GML NTZ: protective on BVL in INF:controversial, possibly RRMS (AFFIRM) late protective effect on BVL ALEM:protective on BVL in (IM INF beta-1a) RRMS (CARE-MS) • Infusions • Injectable DMT

Figure 1. EffectEffect of of FDA FDA-_approved-_approved DMT DMT on onbrain brain atrophy. atrophy. DMT: DMT: Disease Disease modifying modifying treatment treatment.. FTY: FTY:Fingolimod, Fingolimod, TER: TER:, Teriflunomide, DMF: DMF: Dimethylfumarate, Dimethylfumarate, SIP: Siponimod, SIP: Siponimod, CLAD: CLAD: Cladribine, Cladribine, GA: GA:Glatiramer Glatiramer acetate, acetate, INF: INF: Interferons, Interferons, OCR: OCR: Ocrelizumab, Ocrelizumab, NTZ: NTZ: Natalizumab, Natalizumab, ALEM: ALEM: Alemtuzumab, Alemtuzumab, WML: white matter loss, GML:GML: graygray mattermatter loss,loss, BVL:BVL: brainbrain volumevolume loss.loss. 9. Emerging Treatments In addition to the available medication options for treating MS, new drugs that act on different biologic pathways are always being developed and improved upon. Below are medications that were recently approved or are under development. 1. : A recently FDA- approved selective S1P immunomodulator, not launched yet, showed very promising results in cognition and brain atrophy. In 2 phase III trials (SUNBEAM Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 8 of 15

and RADIANCE) ozanimod slowed the rate of BLV, cortical grey matter, and thalamic volume compared to intramuscular interferon beta-1a [87]. 2. : A novel oral immunomodulatory drug with a complex mechanism of action significantly decreased BVL versus placebo (ALLEGRO trial) and versus interferon beta-1a (BRAVO trial) in RRMS cases [88]. 3. Bruton’s kinase (BTK) inhibitors: A class of newer agents, the BTK inhibitors block the activation of B-lymphocytes both in vivo and in vitro [89]. This class includes fenebrutinib, ibrutinib, and evobrutinib; some of them are about to start entering multicenter trials and their effect on axonal integrity is currently unknown. A phase II trial of evobrutinib versus placebo showed a significant reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions with a non-significant effect on annualized relapse rate. Data on BVL were not reported [90]. 4. Ibudilast: A phosphodiesterase inhibitor, originally used in asthma. In a phase II trial (SPRINT-MS) with progressive MS (both PPMS and SPMS) patients, it has shown a 48% difference in atrophy progression compared to placebo over 96 weeks [91]. 5. Lipoic acid: A powerful anti-oxidant showed a very high impact on the annualized rate of whole-brain atrophy versus placebo in SPMS patients in a single-center study having BVL as the primary outcome [92]. 6. High dose biotin: A member of the B-complex showed conflicting results in different clinical trials. An open-label pilot study showed reversal of disability at 9 months with a sustainable effect; however, the MRI data were disappointing and consistent with more new or enlarging lesions than the placebo group [93]. In a single-center study with SPMS, the biotin group showed worsening of disability versus placebo, despite stable MRI scans. More results are pending and atrophy data have not been reported as yet [94]. 7. Cell-based therapies: Experimental therapies, with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) being the most known. AHSCT is in clinical trials and it might be a good option for patients with aggressive RRMS and pronounced inflammation [95]. Early administration and reduction of toxicity are important factors to be addressed before pursuing this therapeutic option [96]. It was observed that brain atrophy increased sharply in the first 2 years after treatment and decreased dramatically after the 2-year time point [97–99]. 8. Aerobic exercise: Cardiorespiratory fitness was found to be associated with the preservation of gray matter volumes in the right post-central gyrus and midline cortical structures that are more commonly involved in MS, suggesting a protective role of high-intensity exercise on neurodegeneration [100].

10. Discussion Inflammation and neurodegeneration are distinct entities, with overlapping features. Neurodegeneration is the major determinant of disability and its management is of utmost importance. It can be seen through all stages of MS, from disease onset to late stages of the disease. When neurodegeneration takes over as the main pathogenetic mechanism of MS, it is too late to reverse the damage. Therefore, early intervention to control inflammation and delay axonal injury and neuronal loss is needed. FDA-approved disease-modifying agents have, at best, a modest effect on brain atrophy that is more prominent after the first year of treatment. The available DMTs mainly target the inflammatory components of the disease, but there is no DMT to completely halt or reverse axonal loss. The fact that DMTs with a similar mechanism (i.e., fingolimod and siponimod) have an opposite effect on progressive MS illustrates the modest benefit of anti-inflammatory agents on axonal injury, and the urgent need to develop molecules with a focus on neurodegeneration. Newer, emerging drugs such as the ibudilast may be very promising, and supplements such as lipoic acid are widely accessible, more affordable, and seem to have a higher impact than the traditional DMT; however, these findings need to be validated in multicenter phase III trials with large samples and long study duration. Exercise is less Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 9 of 15 expensive and free of side effects with a potential beneficial effect on neurodegeneration; therefore, intense fitness training may boost the effect of DMT on BVL. There are still several developing ideas for how to produce an effective MS treatment, such as identifying new targets and further investigating the role of microglia, natural killer cells, and intrathecal IgG synthesis. It is well known that IgG synthesis occurs early in MS and once established, it persists and never disappears. Intravenous natalizumab and steroids cause only a small decrease the intrathecal IgG synthesis; however, it remains essentially unchanged [101]. Effective distribution of a novel MS treatment through the central nervous system is of paramount importance. Intrathecal administration of in SPMS patients was tried in the past with unsatisfactory results, demonstrating inadequate depletion of B cells in the CNS and persistence of the axonal damage marker, the neurofilament light chain [102]. Despite its significant drawbacks, intrathecal administration, either directly by pumps or indirectly through endogenous receptor-mediated transporters, is feasible and may play an important role in treating PPMS by more easily passing through the blood-brain barrier [103]. Small molecules, such as BTK inhibitors, have a higher blood-brain penetration and therefore easier administration. These inhibitors, especially those that target B-cells, may provide a more economical, convenient, and effective treatment option [89]. Within recent years, our knowledge about the basic mechanisms that may be responsible for axonal injury and loss is rapidly increasing. A better understanding of the mechanisms driving neurodegeneration will contribute to the development of novel therapies that may further delay, eliminate, or even reverse neurodegeneration. Novel and effective treatment strategies to prevent or even reverse brain atrophy is not only a priority, but also a necessity for the near future. At the same time, it represents one of the biggest challenges in the therapeutic management of MS patients. Further studies attempting new routes of administration and new drug formulas will lead to a greater understanding of neurodegeneration as it occurs in multiple sclerosis and how it can be mitigated.

Disclosures: Evanthia Bernitsas, MD: Roche/Genentech, Sanofi/Genzyme, Biogen, , Chugai, MedImmune, EMD Serono. Madeline Bross and Melody Hackett: Nothing to disclose. Author Contributions: Evanthia Bernitsas, M.D.: supervision, final draft. Madeline Bross, B.S.: literature review and writing of the first draft. Melody Hackett, B.S.: literature review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this manuscript.

References

1. Lassmann, H.; Brück, W.; Lucchinetti, C.F. The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: An overview. Brain Pathol. 2007, 17, 210–218. [CrossRef][PubMed] 2. Gallien, P.; Gich, J.; Sanchez-Dalmau, B.F. Multidisciplinary management of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Eur. Neurol. 2014, 72, 20–25. [CrossRef][PubMed] 3. Schependom, J.V.; Guldolf, K. Detecting neurodegenerative pathology in multiple sclerosis before irreversible brain tissue loss sets in. Transl. Neurodegener. 2019, 8, 37. [CrossRef][PubMed] 4. Rocca, M.A.; Comi, G.; Filippi, M. The role of T1-weighted derived measures of neurodegeneration for assessing disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2017.[CrossRef] 5. Sastre-Garriga, J.; Pareto, D. Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: Clinical relevance and technical aspects. Neuroimaging 2017, 27, 289–300. [CrossRef] 6. Miller, D.H.; Barkhof, F.; Frank, J.A.; Parker, G.J.M. Measurement of atrophy in multiple sclerosis: Pathological basis, methodological aspects and clinical relevance. Brain 2002, 125, 1676–1695. [CrossRef] 7. Vollmer, T.; Signorovitch, J.; Huynh, L.; Galebach, P. The natural history of brain volume loss among patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 357, 8–18. [CrossRef] Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 10 of 15

8. Andravizou, A.; Dardiotis, E.; Artemiadis, A.; Sokratous, M.; Siokas, V.; Tsouris, Z.; Aloizou, A.M.; Nikolaidis, I.; Bakirtzis, C.; Tsivgoulis, G.; et al. Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: Mechanisms, clinical relevance and treatment options. Autoimmun. Highlights 2019, 10, 7. [CrossRef] 9. De Stefano, N.; Airas, L.; Grigoriadis, N.; Mattle, H.P.; O’Riordan, J.; Oreja-Guevara, C.; Sellebjerg, F.; Stankoff, B.; Walczak, A.; Wiendl, H.; et al. Clinical relevance of brain volume measures in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2014, 28, 147–156. [CrossRef] 10. Ontaneda, D.; Fox, R. Imaging as an outcome measure in multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics 2017, 14, 24–34. [CrossRef] 11. Bernitsas, E.; Bao, F.; Seraji-Bozorgzad, N.; Chorostecki, J.; Santiago, C.; Tselis, A.; Caon, C.; Zak, I.; Millis, S.; Khan, O. Spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis and relationship with disability across clinical phenotypes. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2015, 4, 47–51. [CrossRef][PubMed] 12. Friese, M.A.; Fugger, L. Pathogenic CD8+ T cells in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2009, 66, 132–141. [CrossRef][PubMed] 13. Jones, J.L.; Coles, A.J. Campath-1H treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener. Dis. 2007, 5, 27–31. [CrossRef][PubMed] 14. Barnett, M.H.; Prineas, J.W. Relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis: Pathology of the newly forming lesion. Ann. Neurol. 2004, 55, 458–468. [CrossRef][PubMed] 15. Lassmann, H. Multiple sclerosis pathology: Evolution of pathogenetic concepts. Brain Pathol. 2005, 15, 217–222. [CrossRef] 16. Olerup, O.; Hillert, J.; Fredrikson, S.; Olsson, T.; Kam-Hansen, S.; Möller, E.; Carlsson, B.; Wallin, J. Primarily chronic progressive and relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis: Two immunogenetically distinct disease entities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 7113–7117. [CrossRef] 17. Revesz, T.; Kidd, D.; Thompson, A.J.; Barnard, R.O.; McDonald, W.I. A comparison of the pathology of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 1994, 117, 759–765. [CrossRef] 18. Goodin, D.S. Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome measure of disability in multiple sclerosis: Have we been overly harsh in our assessment? Ann. Neurol. 2006, 59, 597–605. [CrossRef] 19. Henderson, A.P.; Barnett, M.H.; Parratt, J.D.; Prineas, J.W. Multiple sclerosis: Distribution of inflammatory cells in newly forming lesions. Ann. Neurol. 2009, 66, 739–753. [CrossRef] 20. Haider, L.; Fischer, M.T.; Frischer, J.M.; Bauer, J.; Höftberger, R.; Botond, G.; Esterbauer, H.; Binder, C.J.; Witztum, J.L.; Lassmann, H. Oxidative damage in multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain 2011, 134, 1914–1924. [CrossRef] 21. Babinski, J. Recherches sur l’anatomie pathologique de la sclerose en plaque et étude comparative des diverses variétés de la scleroses de la moelle. Archives De Physiologie Normale Et Pathologique 1885, 2, 186–207. 22. Hohlfeld, R. Biotechnological agents for the of multiple sclerosis. Principles, problems and perspectives. Brain 1997, 120, 865–916. [CrossRef][PubMed] 23. Singh, S.; Dallenga, T.; Winkler, A.; Roemer, S.; Maruschak, B.; Siebert, H.; Brück, W.; Stadelmann, C. Relationship of acute axonal damage, Wallerian degeneration, and clinical disability in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 14, 57. [CrossRef][PubMed] 24. Milo, R.; Korczyn, A.D.; Manouchehri, N.; Stüve, O. The temporal and causal relationship between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2019. Online ahead of print. [CrossRef][PubMed] 25. Grigoriadis, N.; Van Pesch, V. A basic overview of multiple sclerosis immunopathology. Eur. J. Neurol. 2015, 2, 3–13. [CrossRef] 26. Srinivasan, R.; Sailasuta, N.; Hurd, R.; Nelson, S.; Pelletier, D. Evidence of elevated glutamate in multiple sclerosis using magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T. Brain 2005, 128, 1016–1025. [CrossRef] 27. Simons, M.; Misgeld, T.; Kerschensteiner, M. A unified cell biological perspective on axon–myelin injury. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 206, 335–345. [CrossRef] 28. Correale, J.; Marrodan, M.; Ysrraelit, M.C. Mechanisms of neurodegeneration and axonal dysfunction in progressive multiple sclerosis. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 14. [CrossRef] 29. Filippi, M.; Rocca, M.A. MR imaging of multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2011, 259, 659–681. [CrossRef] 30. Trapp, B.D.; Nave, K.A. Multiple sclerosis: An immune or neurodegenerative disorder? Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 31, 247–269. [CrossRef] Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 11 of 15

31. Scannevin, R.H.; Chollate, S.; Jung, M.Y.; Shackett, M.; Patel, H.; Bista, P.; Zeng, W.; Ryan, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Lukashev, M.; et al. Fumarates promote cytoprotection of central nervous system cells against oxidative stress via the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 341, 274–284. [CrossRef][PubMed] 32. Arnold, D.L.; Gold, R.; Kappos, L.; Bar-Or, A.; Giovannoni, G.; Selmaj, K.; Yang, M.; Zhang, R.; Stephan, M.; Sheikh, S.I.; et al. Effects of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on MRI measures in the Phase 3 DEFINE study. J. Neurol. 2014, 261, 1794–1802. [CrossRef][PubMed] 33. Miller, D.H.; Fox, R.J.; Phillips, J.T.; Hutchinson, M.; Havrdova, E.; Kita, M.; Wheeler-Kingshott, C.A.; Tozer, D.J.; MacManus, D.G.; Yousry, T.A.; et al. Effects of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on MRI measures in the phase 3 CONFIRM study. Neurology 2015, 84, 1145–1152. [CrossRef][PubMed] 34. O’Gorman, J.; Russell, H.K.; Li, J.; Phillips, G.; Kurukulasuriya, N.C.; Viglietta, V.Effect of aspirin pretreatment or slow dose titration on flushing and gastrointestinal events in healthy volunteers receiving delayed-release dimethyl fumarate. Clin. Ther. 2015, 37, 1402–1419. [CrossRef] 35. Pelletier, D.; Hafler, D.A. Fingolimod for multiple sclerosis. Clin. Ther. 2012, 366, 339–347. [CrossRef] 36. Kappos, L.; Radue, E.W.; O'Connor, P.; Polman, C.; Hohlfeld, R.; Calabresi, P.; Selmaj, K.; Agoropoulou, C.; Leyk, M.; Zhang-Auberson, L.; et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 387–401. [CrossRef] 37. Calabresi, P.A.; Radue, E.W.; Goodin, D.; Jeffery, D.; Rammohan, K.W.; Reder, A.T.; Vollmer, T.; Agius, M.A.; Kappos, L.; Stites, T.; et al. Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 545–556. [CrossRef] 38. Cohen, J.A.; Barkhof, F.; Comi, G.; Hartung, H.P.; Khatri, B.O.; Montalban, X.; Pelletier, J.; Capra, R.; Gallo, P.; Izquierdo, G.; et al. Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 402–415. [CrossRef] 39. Stefano, N.D.; Silva, D.G.; Barnett, M.H. Effect of fingolimod on brain volume loss in patients with multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2017, 31, 289–305. [CrossRef] 40. Bajrami, A.; Pitteri, M.; Castellaro, M.; Pizzini, F.; Romualdi, C.; Montemezzi, S.; Monaco, S.; Calabrese, M. The effect of fingolimod on focal and diffuse grey matter damage in active MS patients. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 2154–2161. [CrossRef] 41. Lublin, F.; Miller, D.H.; Freedman, M.S.; Cree, B.A.; Wolinsky, J.S.; Weiner, H.; Lubetzki, C.; Hartung, H.P.; Montalban, X.; Uitdehaag, B.M.; et al. Oral fingolimod in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (INFORMS): A phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 1075–1084. [CrossRef] 42. Zivadinov, R.; Medin, J.; Khan, N.; Korn, J.R.; Bergsland, N.; Dwyer, M.G.; Chitnis, T.; Naismith, R.T.; Alvarez, E.; Kinkel, P.; et al. Fingolimod’s impact on MRI brain volume measures in multiple sclerosis: Results from MS-MRIUS. J. Neuroimaging 2018, 28, 399–405. [CrossRef][PubMed] 43. Kappos, L.; Bar-Or, A.; Cree, B.A.; Fox, R.J.; Giovannoni, G.; Gold, R.; Vermersch, P.; Arnold, D.L.; Arnould, S.; Scherz, T.; et al. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet 2018, 391, 1263–1273. [CrossRef] 44. Song, Y.; Lao, Y.; Liang, F.; Li, J.; Jia, B.; Wang, Z.; Hui, X.; Lu, Z.; Zhou, B.; Luo, W.; et al. Efficacy and safety of siponimod for multiple sclerosis: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019, 98, e15415. [CrossRef][PubMed] 45. Bruneau, J.M.; Yea, C.M.; Spinella-Jaegle, S.; Fudali, C.; Woodward, K.; Robson, P.A.; Sautès, C.; Westwood, R.; Kuo, E.A.; Williamson, R.A.; et al. Purification of human dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase and its inhibition by A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide. Biochem. J. 1998, 336, 299–303. [CrossRef][PubMed] 46. Bar-Or, A. Teriflunomide (Aubagio®) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 262, 57–65. [CrossRef] 47. Pol, S.; Sveinsson, M.; Sudyn, M.; Babek, N.; Siebert, D.; Bertolino, N.; Modica, C.M.; Preda, M.; Schweser, F.; Zivadinov, R. Teriflunomide’s effect on glia in experimental : A neuroimaging and histologic study. J. Neuroimaging 2019, 29, 52–61. [CrossRef] 48. O'Connor, P.; Wolinsky, J.S.; Confavreux, C.; Comi, G.; Kappos, L.; Olsson, T.P.; Benzerdjeb, H.; Truffinet, P.; Wang, L.; Miller, A.; et al. Randomized trial of oral teriflunomide for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1293–1303. [CrossRef] Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 12 of 15

49. Wolinsky, J.S.; Narayana, P.A.; Nelson, F.; Datta, S.; O’Connor, P.; Confavreux, C.; Comi, G.; Kappos, L.; Olsson, T.P.; Truffinet, P.; et al. Magnetic resonance imaging outcomes from a phase III trial of teriflunomide. Mult. Scler. J. 2013, 19, 1310–1319. [CrossRef] 50. Radue, E.W.; Sprenger, T.; Gaetano, L.; Mueller-Lenke, N.; Cavalier, S.; Thangavelu, K.; Panzara, M.A.; Donaldson, J.E.; Woodward, F.M.; Wuerfel, J.; et al. Teriflunomide slows BVL in relapsing MS: A reanalysis of the TEMSO MRI data set using SIENA. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 4.[CrossRef] 51. Elkjær, M.L.; Molnar, T.; Illes, Z. Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis in real-world setting. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2017, 136, 447–453. [CrossRef][PubMed] 52. Ceronie, B.; Jacobs, B.M.; Baker, D.; Dubuisson, N.; Mao, Z.; Ammoscato, F.; Lock, H.; Longhurst, H.J.; Giovannoni, G.; Schmierer, K. Cladribine treatment of multiple sclerosis is associated with depletion of memory B cells. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 1199–1209. [CrossRef][PubMed] 53. De Stefano, N.; Giorgio, A.; Battaglini, M.; De Leucio, A.; Hicking, C.; Dangond, F.; Giovannoni, G.; Sormani, M.P. Reduced brain atrophy rates are associated with lower risk of disability progression in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine tablets. Mult. Scler. J. 2018, 24, 222–226. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 54. Filippi, M.; Rovaris, M.; Iannucci, G.; Mennea, S.; Sormani, M.P.; Comi, G. Whole brain volume changes in patients with progressive MS treated with cladribine. Neurology 2000, 55, 1714–1718. [CrossRef][PubMed] 55. Comi, G.; Cook, S.; Rammohan, K.; Soelberg Sorensen, P.; Vermersch, P.; Adeniji, A.K.; Dangond, F.; Giovannoni, G. Long-term effects of cladribine tablets on MRI activity outcomes in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: The CLARITY Extension study. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2019, 11.[CrossRef] 56. Giovannoni, G. Cladribine to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics 2017, 14, 874–887. [CrossRef] 57. Johnson, K.P.; Brooks, B.R.; Cohen, J.A.; Ford, C.C.; Goldstein, J.; Lisak, R.P.; Myers, L.W.; Panitch, H.S.; Rose, J.W.; Schiffer, R.B.; et al. Extended use of glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) is well tolerated and maintains its clinical effect on multiple sclerosis relapse rate and degree of disability. Neurology 1998, 50, 701–708. [CrossRef] 58. Ziemssen, T.; Schrempf, W. Glatiramer acetate: Mechanisms of action in multiple sclerosis. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2007, 79, 537–570. 59. Comi, G.; Martinelli, V.; Rodegher, M.; Moiola, L.; Bajenaru, O.; Carra, A.; Elovaara, I.; Fazekas, F.; Hartung, H.P.; Hillert, J.; et al. Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): A randomised, double, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 374, 1503–1511. [CrossRef] 60. Wolinsky, J.S.; Narayana, P.A.; Johnson, K.P.; Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and the MRI Analysis Center. open-label glatiramer acetate extension trial for relapsing multiple sclerosis: MRI and clinical correlates. Mult. Scler. J. 2001, 7, 33–41. [CrossRef] 61. Rovaris, M.; Comi, G.; Rocca, M.A.; Valsasina, P.; Ladkani, D.; Pieri, E.; Weiss, S.; Shifroni, G.; Wolinsky, J.S.; Filippi, M.; et al. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with glatiramer acetate: A multicentre, multinational extension of the European/Canadian double-blind, placebo-controlled, MRI-monitored trial. Mult. Scler. J. 2007, 13, 502–508. [CrossRef][PubMed] 62. Crescenzo, F.; Marastoni, D.; Zuco, C.; Pitteri, M.; Magliozzi, R.; Monaco, S.; Calabrese, M. Effect of glatiramer acetate on cerebral grey matter pathology in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2019, 27, 305–311. [CrossRef][PubMed] 63. Shapiro, S.; Galboiz, Y.; Lahat, N.; Kinarty, A.; Miller, A. The ’immunological-synapse’at its APC side in relapsing and secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis: Modulation by interferon-β. J. Neuroimmunol. 2003, 144, 116–124. [CrossRef][PubMed] 64. Molyneux, P.D.; Kappos, L.; Polman, C.; Pozzilli, C.; Barkhof, F.; Filippi, M.; Yousry, T.; Hahn, D.; Wagner, K.; Ghazi, M.; et al. The effect of interferon beta-1b treatment on MRI measures of cerebral atrophy in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 2000, 123, 2246–2263. [CrossRef][PubMed] 65. Rudick, R.A.; Fisher, E.; Lee, J.C.; Simon, J.; Jacobs, L.; Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Use of the brain parenchymal fraction to measure whole brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 1999, 53, 1698–1704. [CrossRef][PubMed] Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 13 of 15

66. Xu, H.; Mehta, A.K.; Gao, Q.; Lee, H.J.; Ghali, A.; Guasch, A.; Kirk, A.D. B cell reconstitution following alemtuzumab induction under a -based maintenance regimen. Am. J. Transpl. 2020, 20, 653–662. [CrossRef] 67. Arnold, D.L.; Fisher, E.; Brinar, V.V.; Cohen, J.A.; Coles, A.J.; Giovannoni, G.; Hartung, H.P.; Havrdova, E.; Selmaj, K.W.; Stojanovic, M.; et al. Superior MRI outcomes with alemtuzumab compared with subcutaneous interferon β-1a in MS. Neurology 2016, 87, 1464–1472. [CrossRef] 68. Cohen, J.A.; Coles, A.J.; Arnold, D.L.; Confavreux, C.; Fox, E.J.; Hartung, H.P.; Havrdova, E.; Selmaj, K.W.; Weiner, H.L.; Fisher, E.; et al. Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011, 380, 1819–1828. [CrossRef] 69. Coles, A.J.; Twyman, C.L.; Arnold, D.L.; Cohen, J.A.; Confavreux, C.; Fox, E.J.; Hartung, H.P.; Havrdova, E.; Selmaj, K.W.; Weiner, H.L.; et al. Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: A randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012, 380, 1829–1839. [CrossRef] 70. Coles, A.J.; Cohen, J.A.; Fox, E.J.; Giovannoni, G.; Hartung, H.P.; Havrdova, E.; Schippling, S.; Selmaj, K.W.; Traboulsee, A.; Compston, D.A.; et al. Alemtuzumab CARE-MS II 5-year follow-up: Efficacy and safety findings. Neurology 2017, 89, 1117–1126. [CrossRef] 71. Havrdova, E.; Cohen, J.A.; Horakova, D.; Kovarova, I.; Meluzinova, E. Understanding the positive benefit: Risk profile of alemtuzumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Perspectives from the Alemtuzumab Clinical Development Program. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2017, 13, 1423–1437. [CrossRef][PubMed] 72. Neuhaus, O.; Kieseier, B.C.; Hartung, H.P. Mechanisms of mitoxantrone in multiple sclerosis–what is known? J. Neurol. Sci. 2004, 223, 25–27. [CrossRef][PubMed] 73. Buttinelli, C.; Clemenzi, A.; Borriello, G.; Denaro, F.; Pozzilli, C.; Fieschi, C. Mitoxantrone treatment in multiple sclerosis: A 5-year clinical and MRI follow-up. Eur. J. Neurol. 2007, 14, 1281–1287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 74. Buttmann, M.; Seuffert, L.; Mäder, U.; Toyka, K.V. Malignancies after mitoxantrone for multiple sclerosis: A retrospective cohort study. Neurology 2016, 86, 2203–2207. [CrossRef][PubMed] 75. Miller, D.H.; Khan, O.A.; Sheremata, W.A.; Blumhardt, L.D.; Rice, G.P.; Libonati, M.A.; Willmer-Hulme, A.J.; Dalton, C.M.; Miszkiel, K.A.; O'Connor, P.W. A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 15–23. [CrossRef][PubMed] 76. Eisele, P.; Szabo, K.; Ebert, A.; Platten, M.; Gass, A. Brain Atrophy in Natalizumab-treated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A 5-year Retrospective Study. J. Neuroimaging 2018, 29, 190–192. [CrossRef] 77. Miller, D.H.; Soon, D.; Fernando, K.T.; MacManus, D.G.; Barker, G.J.; Yousry, T.A.; Fisher, E.; O'Connor, P.W.; Phillips, J.T.; Polman, C.H.; et al. MRI outcomes in a placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab in relapsing MS. Neurology 2007, 68, 1390–1401. [CrossRef] 78. Portaccio, E.; Stromillo, M.L.; Goretti, B.; Hakiki, B.; Giorgio, A.; Rossi, F.; De Leucio, A.; De Stefano, N.; Amato, M.P. Natalizumab may reduce cognitive changes and brain atrophy rate in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: A prospective, non-randomized pilot study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2013, 20, 986–990. [CrossRef] 79. Vidal-Jordana, A.; Sastre-Garriga, J.; Pérez-Miralles, F.; Tur, C.; Tintoré, M.; Horga, A.; Auger, C.; Río, J.; Nos, C.; Edo, M.C.; et al. Early brain pseudoatrophy while on natalizumab therapy is due to white matter volume changes. Mult. Scler. J. 2013, 19, 1175–1181. [CrossRef] 80. Zivadinov, R.; Hojnacki, D.; Bergsland, N.; Kennedy, C.; Hagemeier, J.; Melia, R.; Ramasamy, D.P.; Durfee, J.; Carl, E.; Dwyer, M.G.; et al. Effect of natalizumab on brain atrophy and disability progression in multiple sclerosis patients over 5 years. Eur. J. Neurol. 2016, 23, 1101–1109. [CrossRef] 81. Bates, D.; Bartholome, E. Treatment effect of natalizumab on relapse outcomes in multiple sclerosis patients despite ongoing MRI activity. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2012, 83, 55–60. [CrossRef][PubMed] 82. Ramos-Cejudo, J.; Oreja-Guevara, C.; Aroeira, L.S.; de Antonio, L.R.; Chamorro, B.; Diez-Tejedor, E. Treatment with natalizumab in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients induces changes in inflammatory mechanism. J. Clin. Immunol. 2011, 31, 623–631. [CrossRef][PubMed] 83. Kappos, L.; Li, D.; Calabresi, P.A.; O'Connor, P.; Bar-Or, A.; Barkhof, F.; Yin, M.; Leppert, D.; Glanzman, R.; Tinbergen, J.; et al. Ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011, 378, 1779–1787. [CrossRef] Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 14 of 15

84. Barkhof, F.; Kappos, L.; Wolinsky, J.S.; Li, D.K.; Bar-Or, A.; Hartung, H.P.; Belachew, S.; Han, J.; Julian, L.; Sauter, A.; et al. Onset of clinical and MRI efficacy of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2019, 93, e1778–e1786. [CrossRef] 85. Montalban, X.; Hauser, S.L.; Kappos, L.; Arnold, D.L.; Bar-Or, A.; Comi, G.; De Seze, J.; Giovannoni, G.; Hartung, H.P.; Hemmer, B.; et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 209–220. [CrossRef] 86. Hauser, S.L.; Bar-Or, A.; Comi, G.; Giovannoni, G.; Hartung, H.P.; Hemmer, B.; Lublin, F.; Montalban, X.; Rammohan, K.W.; Selmaj, K.; et al. Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 221–234. [CrossRef] 87. Comi, G.; Kappos, L.; Selmaj, K.W.; Bar-Or, A.; Arnold, D.L.; Steinman, L.; Hartung, H.P.; Montalban, X.; Havrdová, E.K.; Cree, B.A.; et al. Safety and efficacy of ozanimod versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (SUNBEAM): A multicentre, randomised, minimum 12-month, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 1009–1020. [CrossRef] 88. Vollmer, T.L.; Sorensen, P.S.; Selmaj, K.; Zipp, F.; Havrdova, E.; Cohen, J.A.; Sasson, N.; Gilgun-Sherki, Y.; Arnold, D.L.; BRAVO Study Group. A randomized placebo-controlled phase III trial of oral laquinimod for multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2014, 261, 773–783. [CrossRef] 89. Gregson, A.; Thompson, K.; Tsirka, S.E.; Selwood, D.L. Emerging small-molecule treatments for multiple sclerosis: Focus on B cells. F1000Research 2019.[CrossRef] 90. Montalban, X.; Arnold, D.L.; Weber, M.S.; Staikov, I.; Piasecka-Stryczynska, K.; Willmer, J.; Martin, E.C.; Dangond, F.; Syed, S.; Wolinsky, J.S. Placebo-controlled trial of an oral BTK inhibitor in multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 2406–2417. [CrossRef] 91. Fox, R.J.; Coffey, C.S.; Conwit, R.; Cudkowicz, M.E.; Gleason, T.; Goodman, A.; Klawiter, E.C.; Matsuda, K.; McGovern, M.; Naismith, R.T.; et al. Phase 2 trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 846–855. [CrossRef][PubMed] 92. Spain, R.; Powers, K.; Murchison, C.; Heriza, E.; Winges, K.; Yadav, V.; Cameron, M.; Kim, E.; Horak, F.; Simon, J.; et al. Lipoic acid in secondary progressive MS: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 4, e374. [CrossRef][PubMed] 93. Tourbah, A.; Lebrun-Frenay, C.; Edan, G.; Clanet, M.; Papeix, C.; Vukusic, S.; De Sèze, J.; Debouverie, M.; Gout, O.; Clavelou, P.; et al. MD1003 (high-dose biotin) for the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mult. Scler. J. 2016, 22, 1719–1731. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 94. Birnbaum, G.; Stulc, J.; Snyder, T. High dose biotin as treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2017, 18, 141–143. [CrossRef][PubMed] 95. Chen, J.T.; Collins, D.L.; Atkins, H.L.; Freedman, M.S.; Galal, A.; Arnold, D.L.; Canadian MS BMT Study Group. Brain atrophy after immunoablation and stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2006, 66, 1935–1937. [CrossRef] 96. Scolding, N.J.; Pasquini, M.; Reingold, S.C.; Cohen, J.A.; Atkins, H.; Banwell, B.; Bar-Or, A.; Bebo, B.; Bowen, J.; Burt, R.; et al. Cell-based therapeutic strategies for multiple sclerosis. Brain 2017, 140, 2776–2796. [CrossRef] 97. Inglese, M.; Mancardi, G.L.; Pagani, E.; Rocca, M.A.; Murialdo, A.; Saccardi, R.; Comi, G.; Filippi, M. Brain tissue loss occurs after suppression of enhancement in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004, 75, 643–644. 98. Mariottini, A.; Filippini, S.; Innocenti, C.; Forci, B.; Mechi, C.; Barilaro, A.; Fani, A.; Carlucci, G.; Saccardi, R.; Massacesi, L.; et al. Impact of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation on disability and brain atrophy in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2020. Online ahead of print. [CrossRef] 99. Rocca, M.A.; Mondria, T.; Valsasina, P.; Sormani, M.P.; Flach, Z.H.; Te Boekhorst, P.A.; Comi, G.; Hintzen, R.Q.; Filippi, M. A three-year study of brain atrophy after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in rapidly evolving secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007, 28, 1659–1661. [CrossRef] 100. Prakash, R.S.; Snook, E.M.; Motl, R.W.; Kramer, A.F. Aerobic fitness is associated with gray matter volume and white matter integrity in multiple sclerosis. Brain Res. 2010, 1341, 41–51. [CrossRef] 101. Bonnan, M. Intrathecal IgG synthesis: A resistant and valuable target for future multiple sclerosis treatments. Mult. Scler. Int. 2015.[CrossRef][PubMed] Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4312 15 of 15

102. Komori, M.; Lin, Y.C.; Cortese, I.; Blake, A.; Ohayon, J.; Cherup, J.; Maric, D.; Kosa, P.; Wu, T.; Bielekova, B. Insufficient disease inhibition by intrathecal rituximab in progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2016, 3, 166–179. [CrossRef][PubMed] 103. Hohlfeld, R.; Meinl, E. Ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: Markers and mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 259–261. [CrossRef]

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).