DOCSLIB.ORG

William H. Rehnquist Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
William H. Rehnquist Papers http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt4z09r7tn No online items Register ofthe William H. Rehnquist Papers Processed by David Jacobs, Jessica Lemieux, Natasha Porfirenko, and Elizabeth Konzak Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] Ä 2008 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Register ofthe William H. 2009C15 1 Rehnquist Papers Register ofthe William H. Rehnquist Papers Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Processed by: David Jacobs, Jessica Lemieux, Natasha Porfirenko, and Elizabeth Konzak Date Completed: 2008 Encoded by: Elizabeth Konzak Ä 2008 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: William H. Rehnquist Papers Dates: 1968-2005 Collection number: 2009C15 Creator: Rehnquist, William H., 1924-2005 Collection Size: 571 manuscript boxes, 318 cubic foot boxes, 2 card file boxes, 2 oversize boxes (548 linear feet) Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: Documents the Supreme Court terms of William H. Rehnquist, associate justice from 1972 to 1986 and chief justice from 1986 to 2005. Materials include court case files, administrative files, conference files, correspondence, speeches and writings, book manuscripts, invitations, and other materials. Also includes Rehnquist's law school notebooks from his time at Stanford Law School in 1951 and 1952. Physical location: Hoover Institution Archives Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Boxes 322-331 and 359-893 closed. The remainder of the collection is open for research. U.S. Supreme Court case files and related materials for the Supreme Court's October Terms 1975-2005 in boxes 359-830 shall remain closed during the lifetime of any member of the Supreme Court who served with William H. Rehnquist. Impeachment files in boxes 322-331, and 893 are closed. Video depositions within the Impeachment files in box 330 are closed until 2048 in accordance with Senate Resolution 474. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all audiovisual material is immediately accessible. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives Preferred Citation [Identification of item], William H. Rehnquist Papers, [Box no.], Hoover Institution Archives Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 2008 Biography Born on 1 October 1924 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, William Hubbs Rehnquist served in the Army Air Corps in North Africa during World War II. Once the war ended he attended Stanford University where he received a B.A. in political science. He then earned master's degrees from both Stanford and Harvard, before completing Stanford Law School in 1952. After completing law school, Rehnquist served as a clerk to Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson. Rehnquist married Natalie Cornell, whom he had met at Stanford during his law school years, on 29 August 1953. They had three children. Rehnquist practiced law in Phoenix, Arizona, from 1953 to 1969, becoming active in Republican politics. Register ofthe William H. 2009C15 2 Rehnquist Papers Joining President Richard Nixon's administration in 1969 as head of the office of legal counsel in the Justice Department, in October 1971, President Nixon nominated Rehnquist to be an associate justice on the Supreme Court. Rehnquist served as an associate justice until 1986, when President Ronald Reagan nominated him to replace retiring Chief Justice Warren Earl Burger. Rehnquist was the sixteenth Chief Justice, serving more than 30 years on the Supreme Court. He has the distinction of serving as the second Chief Justice in U.S. history to preside over an impeachment trial of a president, in 1999. A notable decision in Rehnquist's tenure as chief justice was Bush v. gore (2000), which effectively decided the 2000 presidential election for george W. Bush by stopping the recount of contested ballots in Florida. As Chief Justice, Rehnquist stated that his goal was to be remembered as a good administrator. Known for his strong leadership, conservative interpretation of the Constitution, and decisions enhancing the power of the states in the federal system, Rehnquist retained his conservative perspective throughout his tenure on the Court. Ill with thyroid cancer, Rehnquist served as Chief Justice as long as his health permitted. He died on September 3, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia, and is buried in Arlington National Cemetery. Resources: "William Rehnquist" in American Decades 1990-1999. Tandy McConnell, ed. gale group, 2001 in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, Mich.: gale, 2008. Accessed 3 November 2008. http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/BioRC "William Rehnquist" The Scribner Encyclopedia of American Lives. Ed. Arnold Markoe, Karen Markoe, and Kenneth T. Jackson. Vol. 7: 2003-2005. Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2007 in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, Mich.: gale, 2008. Accessed 3 November 2008. http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/BioRC Scope and Content of Collection The William H. Rehnquist papers mainly document Rehnquist's time as a justice of the United States Supreme Court, from 1972 to 1986, then as chief justice from 1986 to 2005. A small amount of material also documents Rehnquist's studies at Stanford Law School in 1951 and 1952. The Stanford Law School Notebooks and Journal contain Rehnquist's class notes, with another volume documenting his accounts and personal journal entries with non-continuously dated portions from 1947 to 1965. Documentation on the U.S. Supreme Court includes administrative files, which document the functional management of the court. Materials include stays, opinions, subject files, correspondence, conference and order lists, and vote sheets. Some administrative files contain collected information on subjects such as abortion cases or capital cases. U.S. Supreme Court Case files contain official printed drafts of each case opinion circulated among the justices. Some files also contain concise correspondence, memoranda, and other materials regarding the case. In many instances, there are multiple cases within one file. Materials are organized by the court term, or October term, in which the case was heard. The U.S. Supreme Court Administrative and Case files from 1972 through 1974, and Rehnquist's Stanford Law School Notebooks and Journal were opened November 17, 2008. Printed opinions and syllabi, Correspondence files, and materials on Rehnquist's books, as well as Additional materials including speeches, writings, notebooks, and other documents, opened in August 2009. Arrangement The collection is organized into series: Law School Notebooks and Journal, U.S. Supreme Court Administrative Files 1969-1974, U.S. Supreme Court Case Files 1972-1974, U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Syllabi, Correspondence, Books, Speeches and Writings, Invitations, Impeachment Files, Notebooks and Calendars, Event Files, Federal Judiciary Administrative Files, National Historic and Public Records Commission files, Supreme Court of the United States Employee Photograph Directories, Personal Files and Miscellany, and Closed U.S. Supreme Court Files 1975-2005. Indexing Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the library's online public access catalog. Subjects United States. Supreme Court Law--United States Boxes: 1-3 Law School Notebooks and Journal, 1947-1965 Scope and Content Note Includes a journal with non-continuous writings dating from 1947-1948 and 1965, and notebooks from Rehnquist's time at Stanford Law School. Å Å Register ofthe William H. 2009C15 3 Rehnquist Papers Law School Notebooks and Journal, 1947-1965 Box: 1 Journal, 1947-1965. Scope and Content Note Labeled Record Book, item contains non-continually dated accounts and journal entries along with documentation of a trip to California in 1948. Å Å Box: 1-3 Stanford Law School Notebooks, 1951-1952. Scope and Content Note Six notebooks include class notes for Administrative Law, Admiralty, Wills, Conflicts, Corporations, Future Interests, Constitutional Law, Equity Notes, Taxation and Conveyances, 1952 Å Å Boxes: 3-16 U.S. Supreme Court Administrative Files, 1969-1974. Scope and Content Note Files contain administrative documentation on cases, including stays, opinions, subject files, correspondence conference and order lists, and vote sheets. Arranged chronologically. Å Å Box: 3 1969-1972. Scope and Content Note Case background material labeled "Personal - to keep" Å Å Å 1971 Box: 3, 4 Capital Cases Files for 1971 Term: 69-5003, William Henry Furman v. State of Georgia; 69-5030, Lucious Jackson, Jr. v. State of Georgia; 69-5031, Elmer Branch v. State of Taxes; 69-5027, Ernest James Aikens, Jr. v. State of California. " Physical Description: (4 folders) Scope and Content Note "Circulated drafts of the opinion, joint memoranda, conference memoranda, per curiam, and concise correspondence between the justices Å Å Box: 4 Cases Held for Decision on Moose Lodge, 1971 Box: 4 Stay applications, 1971 Box: 4 Seventh Circuit and other applications, 1971 Box: 4 Hearing lists and summaries, 1971 Box: 4 Opinions,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Separation of the Governmental System of Powers in This Millennium
    Separation of the Governmental System of Powers in this Millennium The U.S. government is made up of three branches: Legislative, Executive and Judiciary: Legislative: U.S. Congress. Created and maintained by the People. Its primary objective is to make laws. Executive: The Office of the President. Elected by the People by Electoral College. The President’s primary objective is to represent and lead the country, at home and around the world. The President has not the power to impose law (only rules that can be rescinded quite easily) but possesses the power to VETO laws put forth by Congress. Judiciary: The Supreme Court. Currently composed of 9 individual Justices appointed for life by the President and confirmed by the U.S Senate. Their primary objective is to interpret laws. The Supreme Court is shielded from politics so that it can maintain objectivity in its deliberations. *The President can nominate whomever he/she choses. This individual does not need to be a Judge nor does the individual even need to be a lawyer. That said, the Senate would most likely NOT confirm a person who is not perceived to have adequate experience/expertise. The Framers wrote the U.S. Constitution to ensure the health and preservation of our Democracy. Period. They also created a metric to check the President’s power that has impressively stood the test of time. That is until now. President Trump has stressed the system created to preserve our Democracy more than any single one of his 44 predecessors. Up until now, U.S. Presidents have conducted themselves by a largely unwritten code of conduct primarily outlined in the Oath they take on the steps of the Capital on Inauguration Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion Assignment on the Rehnquist Court
    Opinion assignment on the Rehnquist Court Rehnquist’s opinion assignments reflected his ability to balance both the Court’s organizational needs and, occasionally, strategic policy considerations. by FORREST MALTZMAN and PAUL J. WAHLBECK ARTVILLE hen William H. Rehnquist replaced Warren E. completed their work efficiently.4 Rehnquist’s preference Burger as chief justice in 1986, administration for allowing the Court’s administrative needs to guide his Wof the Supreme Court changed markedly. In his opinion assignments was especially pronounced as the 17 years on the job, Chief Justice Burger was reputed to end of the term approached. act strategically to advance his policy objectives. Critics Our account certainly comports with Rehnquist’s own complained that he cast “phony votes” and manipulated description of the factors he weighed in making assign- the assignment of opinions to his brethren.1 For exam- ments: “I tried to be as evenhanded as possible as far as ple, Justice William O. Douglas charged the chief with numbers of cases assigned to each justice, but as the term attempting to “bend the Court to his will by manipulating goes on I take into consid- NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY assignments” when Chief Justice Burger assigned the task eration the extent to of writing the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade to his col- which the various justices league, fellow Nixon appointee Harry A. Blackman.2 are current in writing and As chief justice, Rehnquist claimed that he approached the task of opinion assignment in a strikingly different manner. “This is an important responsibility,” Rehnquist Justice Harry A. Blackmun, whose papers contain once observed, “and it is desirable that it be discharged 3 the assignment sheets carefully and fairly.” Quantitative analysis of patterns in that the chief justice Rehnquist’s assignment of opinions confirms that he circulated at the close of administered this task largely consistent with the goal of every oral argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait Paul R
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 43 | Number 4 Symposium: Maritime Personal Injury March 1983 Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait Paul R. Baier Louisiana State University Law Center Repository Citation Paul R. Baier, Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait, 43 La. L. Rev. (1983) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol43/iss4/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. V ( TI DEDICATION OF PORTRAIT EDWARD DOUGLASS WHITE: FRAME FOR A PORTRAIT* Oration at the unveiling of the Rosenthal portrait of E. D. White, before the Louisiana Supreme Court, October 29, 1982. Paul R. Baier** Royal Street fluttered with flags, we are told, when they unveiled the statue of Edward Douglass White, in the heart of old New Orleans, in 1926. Confederate Veterans, still wearing the gray of '61, stood about the scaffolding. Above them rose Mr. Baker's great bronze statue of E. D. White, heroic in size, draped in the national flag. Somewhere in the crowd a band played old Southern airs, soft and sweet in the April sunshine. It was an impressive occasion, reported The Times-Picayune1 notable because so many venerable men and women had gathered to pay tribute to a man whose career brings honor to Louisiana and to the nation. Fifty years separate us from that occasion, sixty from White's death.
    [Show full text]
  • Clerk and Justice: the Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenCommons at University of Connecticut University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2008 Clerk and Justice: The Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B. Rutledge Laura Krugman Ray Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Ray, Laura Krugman, "Clerk and Justice: The Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B. Rutledge" (2008). Connecticut Law Review. 5. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/5 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 41 NOVEMBER 2008 NUMBER 1 Article Clerk and Justice: The Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B. Rutledge LAURA KRUGMAN RAY Justice John Paul Stevens, now starting his thirty-third full term on the Supreme Court, served as law clerk to Justice Wiley B. Rutledge during the Court’s 1947 Term. That experience has informed both elements of Stevens’s jurisprudence and aspects of his approach to his institutional role. Like Rutledge, Stevens has written powerful opinions on issues of individual rights, the Establishment Clause, and the reach of executive power in wartime. Stevens has also, like Rutledge, been a frequent author of dissents and concurrences, choosing to express his divergences from the majority rather than to vote in silence. Within his chambers, Stevens has in many ways adopted his own clerkship experience in preference to current models. Unlike the practices of most of his colleagues, Stevens hires fewer clerks, writes his own first drafts, and shares certiorari decisionmaking with his clerks.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanct. That the Principal of Equality of Justice for All Has T
    223 We are saying that there are certain things that should be sacro- sanct. That the principal of equality of justice for all has to have meaning, and that indeed, people who have views on individual rights and on sex discrimination, that put in question our whole records on how to end discrimination in affirmative action, should not be confirmed, because all we will be doing is reliving the bat- tles of the 1950's and the 1960's again and again, and it is enough. Senator BIDEN. Thank you. Senator MATHIAS. Once again, I think, for the second time, I thank you for your attendance at this hearing Mr. GOLD. And thank you for your patience, Senator. Senator MATHIAS [continuing]. And your very helpful comments. We appreciate it. Mr. RAUH. Thank you, sir. Senator BIDEN. Thank you all. Senator MATHIAS. May I inquire if Mr. Roy C. Jones of the Liber- ty Federation is in the room? Is Mr. Jones in the room? [No response.] Senator MATHIAS. Then our third panel will be composed of Mrs. LaHaye, the president of Concerned Women for America; Mr. Bruce Fein of United Families Foundation; Miss Sally Katzen, a lawyer with Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering; and Mr. Jack Fuller, the editorial editor of the Chicago Tribune. If you will all raise your right hands. Do you swear that the tes- timony you will give in this proceeding will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Mrs. LAHAYE. I do. Mr. FEIN. I do. Ms. KATZEN. I do.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable William H. Rehnquist 1924–2005
    (Trim Line) (Trim Line) THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST 1924–2005 [ 1 ] VerDate jan 13 2004 15:12 Mar 26, 2008 Jkt 023500 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 C:\DOCS\PRINTED\23500.TXT CRS1 PsN: SKAYNE VerDate jan 13 2004 15:12 Mar 26, 2008 Jkt 023500 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 C:\DOCS\PRINTED\23500.TXT CRS1 PsN: SKAYNE (Trim Line) (Trim Line) WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES MEMORIAL TRIBUTES IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES VerDate jan 13 2004 15:12 Mar 26, 2008 Jkt 023500 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 C:\DOCS\PRINTED\23500.TXT CRS1 PsN: SKAYNE scourt1.eps (Trim Line) (Trim Line) Photograph by Dane Penland, Smithsonian Institution Courtesy the Supreme Court of the United States William H. Rehnquist VerDate jan 13 2004 15:12 Mar 26, 2008 Jkt 023500 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6688 C:\DOCS\PRINTED\23500.TXT CRS1 PsN: SKAYNE 23500.001 (Trim Line) (Trim Line) S. DOC. 109–7 WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES MEMORIAL TRIBUTES IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2006 VerDate jan 13 2004 15:12 Mar 26, 2008 Jkt 023500 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 C:\DOCS\PRINTED\23500.TXT CRS1 PsN: SKAYNE scourt1.eps (Trim Line) (Trim Line) Compiled under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing Trent Lott, Chairman VerDate jan 13 2004 15:12 Mar 26, 2008 Jkt 023500 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 C:\DOCS\PRINTED\23500.TXT CRS1 PsN: SKAYNE (Trim Line) (Trim Line) Order for Printing Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice John Paul Stevens Retires from the Bench
    VOLUME XXXII NUMBER 2, 2010 JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS RETIRES FROM THE BENCH On Monday, June 29, 2010, Justice John Paul Stevens Justice Stevens was raised in Chicago by an influential sat in a formal session of Court for the last time as an active family that operated the Stevens Hotel. At the time, that hotel member of the Supreme Court of the United States. He an- was the largest in the world, boasting 3,000 rooms. nounced on April 9, 2010 his intention to resign in a letter Justice Stevens attended the University of Chicago and to the President. Justice Stevens wrote: “Having concluded then the Northwestern University School of Law. As with that it would be in the best interests of the Court to have my many of his generation, his education was interrupted by successor appointed and confirmed well in advance of the service in the Navy during World War II. When speaking of commencement of the Court’s Photo credit—Photo by Steve Petteway his military experience, Ste- Next Term, I shall retire from vens is fond of reporting that regular active service as an he joined the Navy on Dec. Associate Justice . effec- 6, 1941. “I’m sure you know tive the next day after the how the enemy responded Court rises for the summer the following day,” he quips, recess this year.” His resigna- alluding to the attack at Pearl tion had been anticipated for Harbor that took place on some time following unof- December 7, 1941. Like his ficial comments he made and previous colleague Lewis F.
    [Show full text]
  • Electing Black Mayors
    Electing Black Mayors Political Action in the Black Community William E. Nelson, Jr. and Philip J. Meranto $20.00 ELECTING BLACK MAYORS Political Action in the Black Community By William E. Nelson, Jr., and Philip J. Meranto As the black protest movement swept north in the middle years of the 1960s, a major shift was to take place in its basic theme and fundamental direction that transferred emphasis from the familiar exhortation to demand "freedom now" to an equally urgent summons to marshal the formidable, if un­ tapped, resources of "black power" in the struggle for liberation. This alteration in both informing idea and effective method signified conclusively that blacks, grown angry and frustrated over the slow rate of their social and economic prog­ ress as an oppressed minority, were finally prepared to realize their potential force in order to exercise a decisive measure of po­ litical control over their own lives. As a call to action, black power reflected a growing sense of community among blacks, a fresh awareness of shared experience and a common heritage. More importantly, however, it was both a challenge posed by blacks to themselves to gain some increased measure of control over the institutions of that community, and an appeal for black solidarity and concerted political action as the essential means to that end. An increased concentration of blacks in the major cities of the northern and western United States had come about as the direct result of one of the most significant demographic changes to occur in the nation in the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Bobby L. Rush, Rise of a Black Panther Politican: the Price of Resistance in America
    Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations January 2019 Bobby L. Rush, Rise Of A Black Panther Politican: The Price Of Resistance In America Samuel Hogsette Wayne State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Part of the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Hogsette, Samuel, "Bobby L. Rush, Rise Of A Black Panther Politican: The Price Of Resistance In America" (2019). Wayne State University Dissertations. 2284. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/2284 This Open Access Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. BOBBY L. RUSH RISE OF A BLACK PANTHER POLITICAN: THE LIMITS OF BLACK RESISTANCE IN AMERICA by SAMUEL J HOGSETTE DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University Detroit Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2019 MAJOR: HISTORY Approved By: _____________________________________ Advisor Date ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ DEDICATION This Dissertation is dedicated to several people who have impacted my life in positive ways. In memory of my father Sammie Hogsette who never dreamed such a thing was possible. Black Panthers from Englewood High School Spurgeon “Jake” Winters and Walter “Brother” Johnson who exemplified the spirit of the Panther. Mentor Clyde Williams who helped me realize my full potential. To all the Members of the Illinois Chapter of the Black Panther Party. Aluta’ Continua. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the many people who assisted me in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historian Preserving & Promoting Neighborhood History
    The Historian Preserving & Promoting Neighborhood History Volume 31, No. 1 Winter 2015 Board of Directors Monthly Meetings April 27 June 29 August 31 October 26 December 28 All meetings are held bi-monthly on the last Monday of each even-num- bered month at 7 p.m.at (l-r) Front row: Alderman Debra Silverstein (D) 50; Morrine Sweer, President of NBHOL; Muriel Weinstock, the Society, 1447 W. Morse Secretary of NBHOL; Sid Amdur, treasurer of NBHOL. Rear row: George Milkowski, NBHOL board member. Avenue and are open to all members. Park 557 Renamed North In This Issue Boundary Park By Hank Morris Volunteer Profile page 2 Running north of Touhy Avenue along and is the city limits between Chicago the east side of Kedzie Avenue to Jarvis and Skokie, the organization of home From the President’s Desk Avenue sat the Chicago Park District’s owners had always upheld that Park page 3 Park #557, a 1.6-acre park. For decades #557 served as a gateway to Chicago, the city had owned the property. In 2011, while providing visitors with their “first R.I.P. Bernie Stone, Former 50th the Chicago Park District finally took impression” of their neighborhood. Ward Alderman over the land, calling it Park No. 557. page 4 The North Boundary Home Owners Prior to that time, the strip of land was League first incorporated in 1945. At Rogers Park Launched Chicago’s First Bus Line 98 Years Ago cared for by the North Boundary Home the time, the group’s biggest challenges page 9 Owners League (NBHOL), at its own related to noise and air pollution caused expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks of the Chief Justice: My Life in the Law Series
    REHNQUIST IN FINAL READ.DOC 07/31/03 2:14 PM Lecture REMARKS OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE: MY LIFE IN THE LAW SERIES WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST† INTRODUCTION This afternoon I shall speak about my predecessors as Chief Jus- tice, except for Chief Justice Warren Burger, with whom I served. I am the sixteenth Chief Justice, and certainly one noteworthy fact is that in the 213 years of our country’s existence, while there have been forty-three Presidents, there have been only sixteen Chief Justices. I am going to go in chronological order, starting with John Jay, who was the first Chief Justice, and ending with the fourteenth Chief Jus- tice, Earl Warren. But I shall pass quickly over the first three who held this office, because they really had little or no influence on the institution, and they sat at a time when the Supreme Court was far different from what it is today. During the first ten years of its exis- tence, the Court decided only a total of sixty cases—that is not sixty cases per year, but six cases per year. There was so little business that the Justices sat in Washington for only a few weeks during February and early March, spending the rest of their time riding circuit as trial judges. It was only with the arrival of John Marshall, the fourth Chief Justice, that the Court acquired its co-equal status—along with Con- gress and the President—in our tripartite system of federal govern- ment. Copyright © 2003 by William H. Rehnquist. † Chief Justice of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court and Superman
    THE SUPREME COURT AND SUPERMAN THE JUSTICES AND THE FAMOUS PEOPLE IN THEIR FAMILY TREES Stephen R. McAllister† HILE EXAMINING a photograph of the 1911 U.S. Supreme Court, I spotted Joseph Rucker Lamar, but was initially confused because I thought Justice Lamar served on the Court in the nineteenth century. I quickly discovered that Joseph was the cousin (distant, it turns out) of an earlier Justice, Lu- W 1 cius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar II. I was aware of two other family rela- tionships between Justices who served on the Court: John Marshall Harlan and his grandson, John Marshall Harlan II, and Stephen Johnson Field and his nephew, David Josiah Brewer,2 with the service of only Field and Brewer overlapping.3 † Stephen McAllister is United States Attorney for the District of Kansas, and on leave of absence from the University of Kansas where he is the E.S. & Tom W. Hampton Distinguished Professor of Law. 1 His namesake presumably is Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, the Roman farmer-statesman who legend holds was appointed dictator and left his farm in 458 B.C. to defend Rome against an attacking army, quickly defeated the enemy, and then immediately gave up his power and returned to his farm. 2 The Kansas Justice, David Josiah Brewer, 19 Green Bag 2d 37 (2015). 3 A particularly observant reader of the chart that accompanies this article, or a knowl- edgeable student of Supreme Court history, might wonder whether some other Justices 21 GREEN BAG 2D 219 Stephen R. McAllister Justice John Marshall Harlan, left (1833-1911) and right (1899-1971).
    [Show full text]