DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Board Meeting of the Governing Body to Be Held

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Board Meeting of the Governing Body to Be Held PDF Page No.1 BOARD MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, 14 NOVEMBER 2017 HEMSWORTH COMMUNITY CENTRE, WF9 4NE AT 2.30 PM AGENDA PART 1 No. Agenda Item Lead officer 1. Welcome and Chair’s Opening Remarks 2. Apologies for Absence – 3. Public Questions and Answers 4. Declarations of interest All present 5. a Minutes of the meeting held on 19 September 2017 b Action sheet from the meeting held on 19 September 2017 6. Matters arising 7. MYHT Care Quality Inspection Report - Presentation David Melia (MYHT) 8. Strategic development of urgent and emergency care Ruth Unwin services for the Wakefield district 9. Chief Officer Briefing Jo Webster 10. Written Statement of Action for Children’s Autism, in Melanie Brown response to the outcome of the June 2017 Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Inspection 11. Better Care Fund 2017/19 Melanie Brown Safeguarding 12. a Wakefield and District Safeguarding Adults Board Jo Pollard Annual Report 2016/17 Bill Hodson b Wakefield and District Safeguarding Children Board Edwina Harrison Annual Report 2016/17 c CCG Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2016/17 1 PDF Page No.2 d CCG Safeguarding Adults Annual Report 2016/17 e The Health of Looked after Children Annual Report 2016/17 13. NHS Wakefield CCG Committee Terms of Reference Ruth Unwin 14. Integrated Quality and Performance Summary Report Andrew Pepper/ (measuring the quality and performance of local services) Jo Pollard 15. Finance Report Month 6 - 2017/18 Andrew Pepper 16. Receipt of minutes and items for approval a Audit Committee (i) Minutes of meeting held on 27 July 2017 b Integrated Governance Committee (i) Minutes of meeting held on 17 August 2017 (ii) Minutes of meeting held on 21 September 2017 c Clinical Cabinet (i) Minutes of meeting held on 24 August 2017 (ii) Minutes of meeting held on 28 September 2017 d Connecting Care Executive (i) Minutes of meeting held on 14 September 2017 e Probity Committee (i) Minutes of meeting held on 25 July 2017 (ii) Minutes of meeting held on 28 September 2017 f West Yorkshire and Harrogate Joint Committee of CCGs (i) Minutes of meeting held on 4 July 2017 g Joint Strategic Commissioning Board (111/999) (i) Minutes of meeting held on 8 August 2017 h Health and Well Being Board (i) Minutes of meeting held on 20 July 2017 i Decisions of the Chief Officer – verbal update 17. Any other business 18. The Board is recommended to make the following resolution: “That representatives of the press and other members of the public be excluded from the remainder of this meeting having regard to the confidential nature of the business to be transacted, publicity on which would be prejudicial to the public interest” (Section 1 (2) Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act 1970)”. 19. Date and time of next Public meeting: Tuesday, 18 January 2018 at 1.00 pm in the Boardroom, White Rose House 2 PDF Page No.3 Agenda item: 5a NHS Wakefield Clinical Commissioning Group GOVERNING BODY BOARD MEETING Minutes of the meeting held on 19 September 2017 Hemsworth Community Centre Present: Melanie Brown Programme Commissioning Director Integrated Care Sandra Cheseldine Lay Member Dr Phil Earnshaw CCG Chair Dr Andrew Furber Head of Public Health, Wakefield Council Dr Deborah Hallott GP, New Southgate Surgery Dr Clive Harries GP, Chapelthorpe Medical Centre Stephen Hardy Lay Member Diane Hampshire Nurse Member Richard Hindley Lay Member, Deputy Chair Dr Pravin Jayakumar GP, Trinity Medical Centre Dr Hany Lotfallah Secondary Care Consultant Andrew Pepper Chief Financial Officer Jo Pollard Chief of Service Delivery and Quality Dr Adam Sheppard Assistant Clinical Leader Pat Keane Chief Operating Officer Jo Webster Chief Officer In attendance: Lorraine Chapman Head of Contracting and Performance (item 17/130) Laura Elliott Head of Quality and Engagement (item 17/124) Michele Ezro Associate Director – Service Delivery and Quality Dasa Farmer Engagement Manager (item 17/124) Ruth Unwin Associate Director of Corporate Affairs Gareth Webb Interim Governance & Board Secretary 17/118 Welcome and Chair’s Opening Remarks Dr Earnshaw welcomed members to the meeting. 17/119 Apologies for Absence Apologies were received from: Andrew Balchin Corporate Director, Adults, Health & Communities – Wakefield Council 17/120 Public Questions and Answers A question was received from a member of the public in writing. The question was in relation to DNA (Did Not Attend) letters and Dental Services. The 1 PDF Page No.4 response to the member of the public will be included as an appendix to the minutes of this meeting. 17/121 Declarations of Interest Sandra Cheseldine declared a local interest in the potential closure of the Wrenthorpe Clinic as she lives in an adjacent village and is aware of the interest in the outcome from members of the community. Dr Earnshaw thanked Sandra for the declaration but allowed contribution to the discussion of this item. 17/122 a. Minutes of the meeting held on 11 July 2017 The minutes of the meeting held on 11 July 2017 were agreed. A response to a question raised by a member of the public at the meeting was provided in the appendix to the minutes. b. Action sheet from the meeting held on 11 July 2017. All actions were noted as complete. c. Minutes of the Extraordinary Governing Body meeting in parallel with NHS North Kirklees CCG – 3 August 2017 The minutes of the meeting held on 3 August 2017 were agreed. 17/123 Matters arising There were no matters arising. 17/124 Engagement Annual Report 2016/17 Jo Pollard presented the Engagement Annual Report Paper and the ongoing work of the engagement team with local communities. NHS England has recognised the work of the CCG on engagement by publishing 2 of the CCGs case studies in their latest guidance. Internal Audit on reviewing the work of Engagement and the Annual Report issued a finding of ‘significant assurance’. For Governing Body members to hear the benefits of engagement Jo Pollard introduced Wakefield Patient N who was a member of a Wakefield Learning Disability and Disabled Group who had agreed to share with the Governing Body the engagement he had been involved with as part of this group. Involvement consisted of visiting local supermarkets in the area and seeing how disability friendly they were; and being able to share with other small groups like the one Patient N attends. Patient N had attended Quality Control meetings where he had heard planning discussions and had been able to see the plans completed. When asked what message to give to the Governing Body Patient N wanted to say there is no one perspective of looking at facilities from a single disability point of view. Patient N enjoyed being able to share with others what 2 PDF Page No.5 he had learnt. Patient N wanted his group to continue and to continue sharing. The Governing Body thanked Patient N The Governing Body discussed: The work of small groups and the connections they have in the local community especially Patient Engagement Groups (PEGs) and the support they need to keep motivated; How to engage young people and the significant contribution they can make; Promoting self-care and the use of web browsers. Health care professionals needing to come to terms with their patients researching their own care and support professionals to have clinical confidence; and The Care Navigation pilot and the need for time for patients to adjust to the changes to get the full benefit of the pilot. It was RESOLVED that: (i) members noted the content of the report; and (ii) noted that public engagement is considered and undertaken for all commissioning intentions 17/125 Chief Officer Briefing Jo Webster presented the Chief Officer Briefing. The Better Care Fund submission had been submitted and it is hoped that the partnership with the Local Authority and their data collection will provide assurance as we go through the final stages. The CCG is increasing the funding available under the Better Care Funding following changes in plans to pooling resources with the Local Authority and making better joint decisions. As part of this process and use of the funding all the providers are required to sign into the agreement. Jo Webster confirmed that all the GP practices within Wakefield had signed the agreement. On 3 August 2017 both Wakefield and North Kirklees Governing Bodies had a parallel meeting as part of ‘Meeting the Challenge’ and the final arrangements at Pinderfields. Both Governing Bodies agreed to delegate authority to their respective CCGs Chief Officers and Chairs (on behalf of Wakefield CCG the Deputy Chair as the Dr Earnshaw was on annual leave) to approve the final stage arrangements subject to agreement around any transport issues. Jo Webster confirmed that negotiations had taken place with Yorkshire Ambulance Service to agree additional funding to cover the impact of transfer of patients between sites and it was agreed to cary out a further quality impact assessment to ensure arrangements put in place are sustainable for the future. The Governing Body was informed that the first tranche of services of the Extended GP Access has been launched which is part of the GP Forward View. It should provide services from 6:00pm on week days to 10:00pm and from 9:00am to 3:00pm on a Saturday and Sunday including Bank Holidays, which will increase capacity during the winter months. This is to be 3 PDF Page No.6 introduced in a phased approach to identify and manage any issues. A full phase release is expected by 10 October 2017. The Extended GP Access has purely been developed by the GP Federation with support from Wakefield CCG which demonstrates the CCG commitment to GP services in Wakefield.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • C9 Collection
    C9 COLLECTION O W N E R ’ S H A N D B O O K TIME ON YOUR SIDE... Your Christopher Ward watch has been designed and engineered by highly talented craftspeople to ensure not only accurate and precise timekeeping but also to bring a real pride of ownership that only luxury items of the highest quality can ever hope to deliver. You have made an investment, a good one, and the aim of this handbook is to help you make the most of that investment during what I hope will be a lifetime of ownership. Christopher Ward 1 JOHN HARRISON WATCHMAKER John Harrison was born in 1693 in Foulby, West Yorkshire and lived for most of his life in Barrow upon Humber. He became a carpenter, like his father, was a gifted musician and a self-taught watchmaker, creating his first timepieces entirely out of wood. He moved to London in the 1750s, at the height of his development of his “sea watches” and died in the capital in 1776. The ship’s chronometers were rediscovered at the Royal Greenwich Observatory in the mid-20th century and restored. Today the H1, H2, H3 and H4 are on display at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich. The H5 is owned by the Worshipful Company of Clockmakers, and is displayed in the Clockmaker’s Museum in London’s Guildhall. 2 THE LONGITUDE SOLUTION In 1760 horologist John Harrison took his 1735 invention of the Marine Chronometer to a higher level by making it portable in the form of a pocket watch - his H4 was effectively the first precision watch and the true ancester of the Christopher Ward collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Species Dossier
    Weissia rostellata (Brid) Lindb. Beaked Beardless-moss POTTIACEAE SYN.: Astomum rostellatum (Brid.) Bruch & Schimp., Hymenostomum rostellatum (Brid.) Schimp. Status Bryophyte Red Data Book - Lower Risk (Near-threatened) (2001) Status in Europe: Rare BAP Priority Species Natural England Species Recovery Lead Partner: Plantlife International UK Biodiversity Action Plan This is the current BAP target following the 2001 Targets Review: T1 - Maintain population size at all extant sites. Progress on targets as reported in the UKBAP 2002 reporting round can be viewed by selecting this species and logging in as a guest on the following web page: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/ The full Action Plan for Weissia rostellata can be viewed on the following web page: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=631 Contents 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics................................................2 1.1 Morphology & Identification ........................................................................2 1.2 Taxonomic Considerations..........................................................................4 1.3 Genetic Implications ..................................................................................4 2 Distribution & Current Status ...........................................................................4 2.1 World ......................................................................................................4 2.2 Europe ....................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Wakefield
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Wakefield Report to The Electoral Commission July 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 342 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 13 2 Current electoral arrangements 15 3 Draft recommendations 19 4 Responses to consultation 21 5 Analysis and final recommendations 23 6 What happens next? 67 Appendices A Final recommendations for Wakefield: Detailed mapping 69 B First draft of electoral change Order for Wakefield 71 C Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral Order 76 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 no. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2021 FOI 2387-21 Drink Spiking
    Our ref: 2387/21 Figures for incidents of drink spiking in your region over the last 5 years (year by year) I would appreciate it if the figures can be broken down to the nearest city/town. Can you also tell me the number of prosecutions there have been for the above offences and how many of those resulted in a conviction? Please see the attached document. West Yorkshire Police receive reports of crimes that have occurred following a victim having their drink spiked, crimes such as rape, sexual assault, violence with or without injury and theft. West Yorkshire Police take all offences seriously and will ensure that all reports are investigated. Specifically for victims of rape and serious sexual offences, depending on when the offence occurred, they would be offered an examination at our Sexual Assault Referral Centre, where forensic samples, including a blood sample for toxicology can be taken, with the victim’s consent, if within the timeframes and guidance from the Faculty for Forensic and Legal Medicine. West Yorkshire Police work with support agencies to ensure that all victims of crime are offered support through the criminal justice process, including specialist support such as from Independent Sexual Violence Advisors. Recorded crime relating to spiked drinks, 01/01/2016 to 31/12/2020 Notes Data represents the number of crimes recorded during the period which: - were not subsequently cancelled - contain the search term %DR_NK%SPIK% or %SPIK%DR_NK% within the crime notes, crime summary and/or MO - specifically related to a drug/poison/other noxious substance having been placed in a drink No restrictions were placed on the type of drink, the type of drug/poison or the motivation behind the act (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.349 O LOCAL GOVERNMENT' BOUND.'-RY COMMISSION for £.:Glaild
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.349 o LOCAL GOVERNMENT' BOUND.'-RY COMMISSION FOR £.:GLAilD CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Rt. Hon. William Vftiitelaw,CH,MC,liIP Secretary of Stale for the Homo Department PROPOSALS FOP THp; FUTURE. ELECTORAL ARrtAKGlvIENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT OF WAKivF'JKLD 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the metropolitan district of Wakefield in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 27 August 1975 that v:c were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the District Council, copies of which were circulated to West Yorkshire County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and tho headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public a:id .frosi interested bodies. 3- Vakefield. Metropolitan District Council were invited to prepare a draft •scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Risk Management Strategy 2015-2020
    COMMUNITY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2015-2020 West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service Making West Yorkshire Safer www.westyorksfire.gov.uk Contents 1. Foreword ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. About Us................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Expectations .......................................................................................................................... 3 4. Demographic Profile .............................................................................................................. 5 4.1. Bradford district .............................................................................................................. 5 4.2. Calderdale District .......................................................................................................... 6 4.3. Kirklees District ............................................................................................................... 6 4.4. Leeds District .................................................................................................................. 6 4.5. Wakefield District ............................................................................................................ 7 4.6. Infrastructure .................................................................................................................. 7 5. The Risk Management Process ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Care at Pontefract Hospital 2017
    Urgent Care at Pontefract Hospital 2017 Nichola Esmond Chief Executive Officer September 2017 This report and information in it can be used or reproduced however please ensure the information used is credited to Healthwatch Wakefield. Contents Pontefract Hospital emergency care provision since 2011 .......................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the engagement ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Next steps ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 What happens currently across Wakefield District? .................................................................................................... 8 National Guidance about urgent care .......................................................................................................................... 8 The difference between A&E (or Emergency Department) and Urgent Treatment Centre .................................... 8 Responsibilities of the CCG, including legal requirements ........................................................................................... 9 Legal requirements ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crofton, Ryhill and Walton Ward
    InstantAtlas™ Server 6 Wakefield Ward Profile Selection: Crofton, Ryhill and Walton Ward Introduction The Wakefield district is divided into 21 wards, with each ward being represented by three councillors. Councillors are elected by residents of the district and are responsible for making decisions about local services and budgets, such as Council Tax, on behalf of the local community. Each councillor serves for a period of four years. The ward boundaries are reviewed periodically, and the current boundaries were last altered in 2004. Crofton, Ryhill and Walton Ward is situated from the centre to the southern edge of the District, and incorporates the villages of Walton, Crofton, Ryhill, Wintersett, Havercroft, Cold Hiendley and Notton. The ward also contains Haw Park wood, Walton Colliery Nature Park and part of the Newmillerdam Country Park. Selected landmarks: Anglers Country Park Wintersett and Cold Hiendley reservoirs Profile created: 9/1/2017 Population Profile Population Size The most accurate population estimates are produced every ten years from the Census. These are updated annually using administrative data to produce mid- year population estimates. The mid-2014 estimates show that the size of the resident population in Crofton, Ryhill and Walton Ward is 15,154 people. The tables below shows the percentage breakdown by age groups and gender. The actual number of people in each age group is shown in brackets. Population Size Crofton, Ryhill and Walton Ward Total population (2014) 15,154 people Total male population (2014) 7,413
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2006
    Local Election Results 4th May 2006 Andrew Teale Version 0.10.1 August 22, 2010 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2006 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2006–2010. The author grants permission to copy and distribute this work in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations6 I London Boroughs8 1 North London9 1.1 Barking and Dagenham.......................9 1.2 Barnet................................... 11 1.3 Brent.................................. 14 1.4 Camden................................ 17 1.5 Ealing.................................. 20 1.6 Enfield................................. 23 1.7 Hackney................................ 25 1.8 Hammersmith and Fulham..................... 29 1.9 Haringey................................. 31 1.10 Harrow................................. 33 1.11 Havering................................ 36 1.12 Hillingdon............................... 39 1.13 Hounslow............................... 42 1.14 Islington................................ 44 1.15 Kensington and Chelsea....................... 47 1.16 Newham................................ 49 1.17 Redbridge............................... 53 1.18 Tower Hamlets............................ 56 1.19 Waltham Forest............................ 59 1.20 Westminster............................... 61 2 South London 65 2.1 Bexley.................................
    [Show full text]
  • The TUSC Results
    Elections 2016: The TUSC results Overview – page 3 Summary points – page 7 A note on statistical methods – page 8 Table One: The directly-elected mayoral results – page 9 Table Two: Council ward results ‘league table’ – page 11 Table Three: TUSC local election results by council – page 13 Table Four: Scotland and Wales – page 17 Table Five: Candidates not part of the TUSC umbrella – page 19 Clive Heemskerk TUSC National Election Agent May 10th 2016 1 2 Overview Elections took place on Thursday May 5th 2016 for the Scottish Parliament, the National Assembly for Wales, the Greater London Authority (Mayor and Assembly), and for 124 local authorities in England, including mayoral elections in Bristol, Liverpool and Salford. The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) stood six candidates for constituency seats in the Scottish parliament, three regional lists for the Welsh assembly, candidates for the mayors of Liverpool and Bristol, and 310 local council candidates. These later comprised of 302 candidates contesting seats in 52 authorities with scheduled elections in May, five candidates standing in by- elections in councils without full elections this year, and three TUSC candidates contesting parish council seats. Overall TUSC candidates won a total of 43,309 votes in these elections, comprised of 3,540 votes in Scotland, 2,040 votes in Wales, 6,826 votes in the two mayoral contests, and 30,903 in the English council elections. Details of the results achieved are given in the statistical tables that follow and some significant features of these are presented in the summary points which conclude this introductory overview.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontefract North Ward
    InstantAtlas™ Server 6 Wakefield Ward Profile Selection: Pontefract North Ward Introduction The Wakefield district is divided into 21 wards, with each ward being represented by three councillors. Councillors are elected by residents of the district and are responsible for making decisions about local services and budgets, such as Council Tax, on behalf of the local community. Each councillor serves for a period of four years. The ward boundaries are reviewed periodically, and the current boundaries were last altered in 2004. Pontefract North Ward is situated towards the north east of the district and includes a large part of the town of Pontefract. There is greenspace to the north west of the town, including Pontefract Racecourse. Selected landmarks: Pontefract castle and museum Pontefract market Pontefract race course and park Profile created: 9/1/2017 Population Profile Population Size The most accurate population estimates are produced every ten years from the Census. These are updated annually using administrative data to produce mid- year population estimates. The mid-2014 estimates show that the size of the resident population in Pontefract North Ward is 16,017 people. The tables below shows the percentage breakdown by age groups and gender. The actual number of people in each age group is shown in brackets. Population Size Pontefract North Ward Total population (2014) 16,017 people Total male population (2014) 7,843 people Total female population (2014) 8,173 people Source: Office for National Statistics Population Groups (% of total population) Pontefract North Ward Wakefield England People aged 0-15 (2014) 19.3% (3087 people) 18.5% 19.0% People aged 16-29 (2014) 17.3% (2783 people) 16.9% 18.3% People aged 30-44 (2014) 19.5% (3140 people) 18.9% 19.9% People aged 45-64 (2014) 26.6% (4275 people) 27.3% 25.3% People aged 65 and over (2014) 17.2% (2755 people) 18.4% 17.6% Source: Office for National Statistics Ethnicity and Language Wakefield district has become more ethnically diverse over the past 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2006
    Local Election Results May 2006 Andrew Teale July 29, 2013 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2006 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2011. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ The LATEX source code is available for download at http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/pdf/2006/2006-source.zip Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 29 July 2013: Corrected gain information for Derby. Chaddesden ward was a Labour hold; Chellaston ward was a Labour gain from Conservative. 23 June 2013: Corrected result for Plymouth, Southway. The result previously shown was for a June 2006 by-election. Contents I London Boroughs 11 1 North London 12 1.1 Barking and Dagenham....................... 12 1.2 Barnet.................................. 14 1.3 Brent.................................. 17 1.4 Camden................................ 20 1.5 Ealing.................................. 23 1.6 Enfield................................. 26 1.7 Hackney................................ 28 1.8 Hammersmith and Fulham...................... 31 1.9 Haringey................................ 33 1.10 Harrow................................. 36 1.11 Havering................................ 39 1.12 Hillingdon............................... 42 1.13 Hounslow............................... 45 1.14 Islington................................ 47 1.15 Kensington and Chelsea....................... 50 1.16 Newham................................ 52 1.17 Redbridge............................... 56 1.18 Tower Hamlets...........................
    [Show full text]