DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlantic Menhaden

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlantic Menhaden SEDAR Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review SEDAR 69 Benchmark Stock Assessment Report Atlantic Menhaden January 2020 SEDAR 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201 North Charleston, SC 29405 Please cite this document as: SEDAR. 2020. SEDAR 69 – Atlantic Menhaden Benchmark Stock Assessment Report. SEDAR, North Charleston SC. 691 pp. available online at: http://sedarweb.org/sedar-69 Table of Contents Pages of each Section are numbered separately. Section I: Preface Pg. 4 Section II Assessment Process Report Pg. 5 Section III: Review Workshop report Pg. 486 Section IV: Appendices Pg. 504 1. Preface The development and peer review of the 2019 Atlantic Menhaden Stock Assessment occurred through a joint Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) process. From April 2018 to June 2019, the ASMFC coordinated a Data Workshop and three Assessment Workshops in Arlington, Virginia, and Raleigh, North Carolina, while SEDAR coordinated the Review Workshop in Charleston, South Carolina. The report is the culmination of a two-year effort to gather and analyze available data for Atlantic menhaden from the fishery-independent sampling programs of the Atlantic States, commercial purse-seine reduction fishery, and commercial bait fishery. ASMFC developed the stock assessment through its Atlantic Menhaden Technical Committee (TC) and Stock Assessment Subcommittee (SAS). The ASMFC facilitated numerous conference calls and webinars in preparation for the Data, Assessment, and Review Workshops. Participants in the stock assessment process included TC and SAS members, as well as representatives from the fishing industry and Non- Governmental Organizations with an interest in menhaden. In addition to the single-species menhaden stock assessment report, an Ecosystem Reference Points (ERP) stock assessment report was developed by the ASMFC Ecosystem Reference Points Work Group, and reviewed by the SEDAR 69 Panel. The ASMFC facilitated several webinars and meetings of the Work Group, coinciding with the Menhaden SAS meetings, to develop the ERP Assessment. The ERP report describes ecosystem monitoring and modeling approaches, and provides reference points designed to address multispecies interactions for a subset of stocks managed by the ASMFC, including management of menhaden for forage services in a broader ecosystem management context. The SEDAR 69 single-species stock assessment report and ERP stock assessment report were generated and provided to three reviewers appointed by the Center for Independent Experts (CIE), as well as a fourth technical reviewer and the review panel chair appointed by ASMFC. The Review Workshop was held in Charleston, South Carolina, from November 4-8, 2019. At the Workshop, reviewers had opportunities to raise questions to the SAS and ERP WG, and provide critiques and constructive comments on the data and models used. A Review Workshop Report (Section III) was generated with comments and overall opinions about the data sources, models, and assessment results. The Review Report, Single-Species Stock Assessment Report, and Ecosystem Reference Points Stock Assessment Report will be provided to the ASMFC Atlantic Menhaden Management Board in February 2020. The ASMFC and its committees thank the independent peer reviewers for their time and expertise in providing a thorough review of the Atlantic menhaden stock assessment and the Ecosystem Reference Points stock assessment. Additionally, ASMFC expresses its gratitude to all of the individuals who contributed to the completion of both stock assessments. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Atlantic Menhaden 2019 Stock Assessment Report Vision: Sustainable and Cooperative Management of Atlantic Coastal Fisheries i ASMFC Atlantic Menhaden Stock Assessment Subcommittee: Amy Schueller (Chair), National Marine Fisheries Service Kristen Anstead, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Max Appelman, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Joseph Ballenger, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Jeffrey Brust, New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife Matt Cieri, Maine Department of Marine Resources Micah Dean, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Katie Drew, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Robert Latour, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Jason McNamee, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Ray Mroch, National Marine Fisheries Service Alexei Sharov, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chris Swanson, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute ASMFC Atlantic Menhaden Technical Committee: Joseph Ballenger (Chair), South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Jeffrey Brust, New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife Matt Cieri, Maine Department of Marine Resources Ellen Cosby, Potomac River Fisheries Commission Caitlin Craig, New York Department of Environmental Conservation Micah Dean, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Corrin Flora, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Kurt Gottschall, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Robert Latour, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Eddie Leonard, Georgia Department of Natural Resources Jason McNamee, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Ray Mroch, National Marine Fisheries Service Josh Newhard, US Fish and Wildlife Service Derek Orner, National Marine Fisheries Service Amy Schueller, National Marine Fisheries Service Alexei Sharov, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chris Swanson, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Jeff Tinsman, Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife A publication of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4740069_______ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission thanks all of the individuals who contributed to the development of the Atlantic menhaden stock assessment. The Commission specifically thanks the ASMFC Atlantic Menhaden Technical Committee and Stock Assessment Subcommittee (SAS) members who developed the consensus stock assessment report as well as the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program staff Julie Defilippi Simpson for validating landings. Thank you to Harvey Walsh (NOAA) for his immense help providing data and support for the EcoMon data set, Kevin Friedland and Scott Large (NEFSC) for their work and continued dialogue with the SAS regarding the Ecosystem Context Report for Atlantic Menhaden, James Gartland for contributing to the fecundity analysis, and Jeremy Collie and Rich Bell for discussing and adapting their stock productivity analysis for the SAS. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the current status of Atlantic menhaden as a single-species along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Landings The Atlantic menhaden commercial fishery has two major components, a purse-seine reduction sector that harvests fish for fish meal and oil and a bait sector that supplies bait to other commercial and recreational fisheries. The first coastwide total allowable catch (TAC) for Atlantic menhaden was implemented in 2013 at 170,800 mt. While the TAC increased to 187,880 mt in 2015, 200,000 mt in 2016, and 216,000 mt in 2017, total coastwide landings have remained under 200,000 mt. Since the implementation of the TAC, reduction landings have ranged from 128,900 mt in 2017 to 143,500 mt in 2015 and the bait landings have ranged from 37,000 mt in 2013 to 45,500 in 2015. In 2017, reduction landings were 128,900 mt and accounted for approximately 74% of coastwide landings. Landings in the reduction fishery are currently at their lowest levels in the time series (1955-2017). In contrast, bait landings have increased in recent years as demand has grown because of recent limitations in other species used as bait (e.g., Atlantic herring), peaking in 2012 at 63,700 mt. In 2017, bait landings were 43,900 mt and comprised 25% of coastwide landings. Recreational landings comprised 1% of the coastwide landings. Indices of Relative Abundance Young of the Year (YOY) Index The YOY index developed from 16 fishery-independent surveys shows the largest YOY abundance occurred during the 1970s and 1980s. Abundance has since been lower with notable year classes in the mid-2000s and in 2016. The terminal year, 2017, had the lowest YOY abundance of the time series (1959-2017). Age-1+ Indices Three coastwide indices of adult abundance were developed from eight fishery independent survey data sets: northern (NAD; age-2+), Mid-Atlantic (MAD; age-1+), and southern (SAD; age- 1) adult indices. The SAD indicated that age-1 abundance was high in 1990 and low in recent years, with a notable increase in the terminal year of 2017. The MAD showed high relative abundance in the late 1980s, with variable abundance and then peaks in 2014 and 2015 followed by low abundance in the terminal year. The NAD indicated that age-2+ relative abundance has been variable, but abundance was high in 2014, 2015, and 2016, followed by a decline in the terminal year. Fishing Mortality Highly variable fishing mortalities were noted throughout the entire time series and appear dependent upon fishing and management policies. Fishing mortality rate over time was reported as the geometric mean fishing mortality rate at ages-2 to -4. The rate was highest in the 1970s and 1980s and has been declining since approximately 1990. Atlantic Menhaden Benchmark Stock Assessment 2019 iv Biomass Biomass has fluctuated over time from an estimated high of greater
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Choosing the Best Marine-Derived Omega-3 Products for Therapeutic Use: an Evaluation of the Evidence
    STEVENS POINT, WISCONSIN Technical Report Choosing the Best Marine-derived Omega-3 Products for Therapeutic Use: An Evaluation of the Evidence October 2013 The Point Institute is an independent research organization focused on examining and disseminating information about the use of natural therapeutic options for treating and preventing chronic disease. We provide these technical reports as research summaries only-they are not intended to be used in place of sound medical advice by a licensed health care practitioner. The Point Institute Director: Thomas Guilliams Ph.D. Website: www.pointinstitute.org Email: [email protected] The Point Institute www.pointinstitute.org Choosing the Best Marine-derived Omega-3 Products for Therapeutic Use: An Evaluation of the Evidence There is overwhelming data to recommend a wide range of therapeutic uses for marine-derived omega-3 fatty acids (primarily EPA and DHA). Likewise, there are also an overwhelming number of different forms, sources and ways to deliver these omega-3 fatty acids; which unfortunately, has led to confusion in product selection for both clinician and patient alike. We will walk through the most common issues discussed in selecting the appropriate omega-3 fatty acid product, with the goal to bring clarity to the decision-making process. For the most part, the marine omega-3 fatty acid category is dominated by products that can be best described as “fish oil.” That is, while there are products available that deliver omega-3 fatty acids from other marine sources, nearly all the available research has been done with fish oil derived fatty acids. This fish oil data has become the benchmark for efficacy and safety, and is the standard to which we compare throughout this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Nation's Fisheries Will Be a Lot Easier Once We've Used up Everything Except Jellyfish!
    Mismanaging Our Nation’s Fisheriesa menu of what's missing Limited quantity: get ‘em while supplies last Ted Stevens Alaskan Surprise Due to years of overfishing, we probably won’t be serving up Pacific Ocean perch, Tanner crab, Greenland turbot or rougheye rockfish. They may be a little hard to swallow, but Senator Stevens and the North Pacific Council will be sure to offer last minute riders, father and son sweetheart deals, record-breaking quotas, industry-led research, conflicts of interest and anti-trust violations. Meanwhile, fur seals, sea lions and sea otters are going hungry and disappearing fast. Surprise! Pacific Rockfish: See No Fish, Eat No Fish Cowcod, Canary Rockfish and Bocaccio are just three examples of rockfish managed by the Pacific Council that are overfished. As for the exact number of West Coast groundfish that are overfished, who knows? Without surveys to tell them what’s going on, what are they managing exactly? Striped Bass: Thin Is In! This popular Atlantic rockfish is available in abundance. Unfortunately, many appear to be undernourished and suffering from lesions – a condition that may point to Omega Protein’s industrial fishery of menhaden, the striper’s favorite prey species. Actually, you may want to hold off on this one until ASMFC starts regulating menhaden. Can you believe there are still no catch limits? Red Snapper Bycatch Platter While we are unable to provide full-size red snapper, we offer this plate of twenty juvenile red snapper discarded as bycatch from a Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawler for your dining pleasure. Shrimpers take and throw away about half of all young red snappers along the Texas coast, so we’ll keep these little guys coming straight from the back of the boat to the back of your throat! Caribbean Reef Fish Grab Bag What’s for dinner from the Caribbean? Who knows? With coral reefs in their jurisdiction, you would expect the Caribbean Council to be pioneering the ecosystem-based management approach and implementing the precautionary principle approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Atlantic Menhaden Ecological Reference Points
    Review of Atlantic Menhaden Ecological Reference Points Steve Cadrin July 27 2020 The Science Center for Marine Fisheries (SCeMFiS) requested a technical review of analyses being considered by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) to estimate ecological reference points (ERPs) for Atlantic menhaden by applying a multispecies model (SEDAR 2020b). Two memoranda by the ASMFC Ecological Reference Point Work Group and Atlantic Menhaden Technical Committee were reviewed: • Exploration of Additional ERP Scenarios with the NWACS-MICE Tool (April 29 2020) • Recommendations for Use of the NWACS-MICE Tool to Develop Ecological Reference Points and Harvest Strategies for Atlantic Menhaden (July 15 2020) Summary • According to the SEDAR69 Ecological Reference Points report, the multi-species tradeoff analysis suggests that the single-species management target for menhaden performs relatively well for meeting menhaden and striped bass management objectives, and there is little apparent benefit to striped bass or other predators from fishing menhaden at a lower target fishing mortality. • Revised scenarios of the SEDAR69 peer-reviewed model suggest that results are highly sensitive to assumed conditions of other species in the model. For example, reduced fishing on menhaden does not appear to be needed to rebuild striped bass if other stocks are managed at their targets. • The recommendation to derive ecological reference points from a selected scenario that assumes 2017 conditions was based on an alternative model that was not peer reviewed by SEDAR69, and the information provided on alternative analyses is insufficient to determine if it is the best scientific information available to support management decisions. • Considering apparent changes in several stocks in the multispecies model since 2017, ecological reference points should either be based on updated conditions or long-term target conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Blood Proteins in Herring
    FiskDir. Skr. SET.HavUi~ders., 15: 356-367. COMPARISON OF PACIFIC SARDINE AND ATLANTIC MENHADEN FISHERIES BY JOHN L. MCHUGH Office of Marine Resources U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION The rise and fall of the North American Pacific coast sardine fishery is well known. Oilce the most important fishery in the western hemisphere in weight of fish landed, it now produces virtually nothing. The meal and oil industry based on the Pacific sardine (Sardinoljs caerulea) resource no longer exists. The sardine fishery (Fig. 1A) began in 1915, rose fairly steadily to its peak in 1936 (wit11 a dip during the depression), maintained an average annual catch of more than 500 000 tons until 1944, then fell off sharply. Annual production has not exceeded 100 000 tons since 1951, and commercial sardine fishing now is prohibited in California waters. A much smaller fishery for the southern sub-population developed off Baja California in 195 1. The decline of the west coast sardine fishery gave impetus to the much older menhaden (Breuoortia tyranlzus) fishery (Fig. 1B) along the Atlantic coast of the United States. Fishing for Atlantic menhaden began early in the nineteenth century. From the 1880's until the middle 1930's the annual catch varied around about 200 000 tons. In the late 1930's annual landings began to increase and from 1953 to 1962 inclusive re- mained above 500 000 tons. The peak year was 1956, with a catch of nearly 800 000 tons. After 1962 the catch began to fall off sharply, reach- ing a low of less than 250 000 tons in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Fishery Production in 1946
    FISH ANDWILDLIFE SERVICE I For Release to PM's TUESDAY,JANUARY 14, 1947. U. S. FISHERYPRODUCTION y 1946 / In 1946 the little known menhaden became the major item in the United States . \ fish catch, which totaled 4.2 billion pounds, the Fish and Wildlife Service, I United States Department of-the Interior, announced today. The menhaden, an Atlantic coast fish used chiefly in the manufacture of fish _- . meal and oil, replaced the Pacific pilchard or sardine which has supported the Nation's largest fishery for the past 12 years, Although the 1946 production was not far bekwu average in volume, the year was marked by extremes of success or failure almost without parallel in the history of the fisheries. Rosefish and tuna exceeded all previous production records; the _ < salmon pack was the smallest since 1927; the menhaden catch was the largest on record; the pilchard fishery experienced the worst season in its history. In terms of pounds landed, the leading fisheries last year were menhaden, . 4 pilchard,._ salmon, tuna, Alaska herring, and rosefish. These six accounted for more than half of the total production. The Fish and Wildlife Service reported that the catch of menhaden was approx- . I s . imately 900,000,000 pounds, compared with 756,000,OOO pounds in 1945 and . 686;ooojooo in 1944. The menhaden, which has supported a fishery since colonial I times, is a schooling fish of the herring family which occurs in tremendous numbers . along the Atlantic coast and in its bays and estuaries. Present centers of the menhaden industry are Lewes, Del,, Reedville, Va,, ,Port M&mouth, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Off Newfoundland and Labrador Determined from Genetic Variation
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua Newfoundland and Labrador population Laurentian North population Maritimes population Arctic population in Canada Newfoundland and Labrador population - Endangered Laurentian North population - Threatened Maritimes population - Special Concern Arctic population - Special Concern 2003 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2003. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 76 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jeffrey A. Hutchings for writing the update status report on the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Rapport du COSEPAC sur la situation de la morue franche (Gadus morhua) au Canada Cover illustration: Atlantic Cod — Line drawing of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua by H.L. Todd. Image reproduced with permission from the Smithsonian Institution, NMNH, Division of Fishes. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2003 Catalogue No.CW69-14/311-2003-IN ISBN 0-662-34309-3 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment summary — May 2003 Common name Atlantic cod (Newfoundland and Labrador population) Scientific name Gadus morhua Status Endangered Reason for designation Cod in the inshore and offshore waters of Labrador and northeastern Newfoundland, including Grand Bank, having declined 97% since the early 1970s and more than 99% since the early 1960s, are now at historically low levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish and Invertebrates: Biology and Harvesting Technology - R
    FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE – Vol. II - Marine Fish and Invertebrates: Biology and Harvesting Technology - R. Radtke MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATES: BIOLOGY AND HARVESTING TECHNOLOGY R. Radtke University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, Honolulu, USA Keywords: fisheries, trophic, harvesting, fecundity, management, species, equilibrium yield, biomass, stocks, otoliths, calcified tissues, teleost fishes, somatic growth, population, recruitment, mortality, population, cation and anion densities, genotype, acoustic biomass estimation, aquaculture, ecosystems, anthropogenic, ecological, diadromous species, hydrography, Phytoplankton, finfish, pelagic, demersal, exogenous, trophic, purse seines, semidemersal, gadoid, morphometrics, fecundity, calanoid, copepods, euphausiids, caudal fin, neritic species, epibenthic, epipelagic layers, thermocline, nacre, benthepelagic, discards, pots. Contents 1. Introduction 2. New Approaches 3. Biology and Harvesting of Major Species 3.1. Schooling Finfish (Cods, Herrings, Sardines, Mackerels, and others) 3.2. Tunas, Billfish and Sharks 3.3. Shrimp and Krill 3.4. Crabs and Lobsters 3.5. Shelled Molluscs (Clams, Oysters, Scallops, Pearl Oysters, and Abalone) 3.6. Cephalopods: Octopus and Squid 3.7. Orange Roughy and Other Benthic Finfish 3.8. Flatfishes and Skates 4. Marine Plants: Production and Utilization 5. Commercial Sea-Cucumbers and Trepang Markets 6. Importance of Non-Commercial Fish 7. The Problem of Discards in Fisheries 8. Fisheries Engineering and Technology: Fishing Operation and Economic Considerations 9. Subsistence Hunting of Marine Mammals GlossaryUNESCO – EOLSS Bibliography Biographical Sketch SAMPLE CHAPTERS Summary The technology to understand and harvest fishery resources has expanded markedly in recent times. This expansion in information has allowed the harvesting of new species and stocks. Information is important to preservation and responsible harvesting. For managers and project organizers alike, knowledge is the cornerstone to successful fishery resource utilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Menhadentexasfull.Pdf Ocean Associates, Incorporated Oceans and Fisheries Consulting
    Ocean Associates, Inc. Ocean Associates, Inc. Phone: 703-534-4032 4007 N. Abingdon Street Fax: 815-346-2574 Arlington, Virginia USA 22207 Email: [email protected] http://www.OceanAssoc.com March 24, 2008 Toby M. Gascon Director of Government Affairs Omega Protein, Inc. Ref: Gulf of Mexico Menhaden: Considerations for Resource Management Dear Mr. Gascon, In response to your Request for Scientific Analysis regarding proposed regulations for menhaden fishing in Texas waters, herewith is our response to your questions. We have formatted it as a report. It includes a Preface, which sets the stage, an Executive Summary without citations, and a response to each of the questions with supporting citations. We have enclosed a copy of the paper (Condrey 1994) we believe was used by TPWD in drafting the proposed regulations. It has the appropriate underlying numbers and is the only study with sufficient detail to be used for the type of analysis attempted by TPWD. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this analysis. It came at an opportune time. I have been developing the ecosystem material included in this document for many years, ever since the basic theory was proposed to me by a Russian colleague who went on to become the Soviet Minister of Fisheries. As Chief of the NMFS Research Division, I read countless documents regarding fisheries research and management, and attended many conferences and program reviews, slowly gaining the knowledge reflected in this report. The flurry of menhaden writings and government actions gave me impetus to complete the work, and your request accelerated it further. I expect the ecosystem materials in this present report will soon be part of a more- detailed formal scientific paper documenting the role of menhaden in coastal ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Shortnose Sturgeon in the Potomac River
    Final Report Status of Shortnose Sturgeon in the Potomac River PART I – FIELD STUDIES Report prepared by: Boyd Kynard (Principal Investigator) Matthew Breece and Megan Atcheson (Project Leaders) Micah Kieffer (Co-Investigator) U. S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Leetown Science Center S. O. Conte Anadromous Fish Research Center Turners Falls, Massachusetts 01376 and Mike Mangold (Assistant Project Leader) U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Maryland Fishery Resources Office 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Report prepared for: National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, D.C USGS Natural Resources Preservation Project E 2002-7 NPS Project Coordinator – Jim Sherald BRD Project Coordinator – Ed Pendelton July 20, 2007 Gravid shortnose sturgeon female captured at river kilometer 63 on the Potomac River. Project leader, Matthew Breece (USGS), is shown with the fish on March 23, 2006. Summary Field studies during more than 3 years (March 2004–July 2007) collected data on life history of Potomac River shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum to understand their biological status in the river. We sampled intensively for adults using gill nets, but captured only one adult in 2005. Another adult was captured in 2006 by a commercial fisher. Both fish were females with excellent body and fin condition, both had mature eggs, and both were telemetry- tagged to track their movements. The lack of capturing adults, even when intensive netting was guided by movements of tracked fish, indicated abundance of the species was less than in any river known with a sustaining population of the species. Telemetry tracking of the two females (one during September 2005–July 2007, one during March 2006–February 2007) found they remained in the river for all the year, not for just a few months like sturgeons on a coastal migration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diet of Chesapeake Bay Ospreys and Their Impact on the Local Fishery
    ]. RaptorRes. 25(4):109-112 ¸ 1991 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. THE DIET OF CHESAPEAKE BAY OSPREYS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE LOCAL FISHERY PETER K. MCLEAN • AND MITCHELL A. BYRD Departmentof Biology,College of William and Mary, Williamsburg,VA 23785 ABSTRACT.--Ospreys(Pan dion haliaetus), were observedat sevennests located in southwesternChesapeake Bay, for 642 hr between21 May and 25 July 1985. On average5.4 fish/day were deliveredto the nests. The size of fish deliveredranged from 4 to 43 cm, and the mean weight of fish deliveredwas 156.9 g. Atlantic Menhaden (Brevortiatyrannus) accounted for nearly 75% of the diet, although White Perch (Motone americana),Atlantic Croaker (Micropogoniasundulatus), Oyster Toadfish (Opsanustau), and American Eel (Anguilla rostrata)also were commonprey. ChesapeakeBay Ospreys,estimated at 3000 breedingpairs, would be expectedto eat about 132 171 kg of fish during the 52-day nestlingperiod. This "harvest"represents 0.004% of the annual ChesapeakeBay commercialharvest and likely has a minimal impact on the local fishery. La dietade fixguila Pescadora (Pan dion haliaetus) en la BahiaChesapeake y su impacto en la pescalocal EXTR^CTO.--fixguilasPescadoras (Pandion haliaetus) en sietenidos ubicados en la zonasudoeste de la Bahia Chesapeake,fueron observadas por 642 horasentre el 21 de mayo y el 25 de julio de 1985. Un promediode 5.4 pesces/diafueron 11evadosa cada nido. E1 tamafio del pescadoque rue 11evadoal nido oscil6entre 4 y 43 cm, y el pesomedio fue de 156.9 g. Los pecesde la especieBrevortia tyrannus constituyeroncerca del 75% de la dieta,aunque peces de las especiesMorone americana, Microp.ogonias undulatus,Opsanus tau, Anguilla rostrata tambign fueron presa comfin.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
    little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc.
    [Show full text]