Offsite Infrastructure Ecological Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Offsite Infrastructure Ecological Assessment Report Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project SEIS Report for Offsite Infrastructure Ecological Assessment 31 October 2013 This Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project SEIS: Offiste Infrastructure Ecological Assessment (“the Report”) has been prepared by GHD Pty Ltd (“GHD”) on behalf of and for Adani Mining Pty Ltd (“Adani”) in accordance with an agreement between GHD and Adani. The Report may only be used and relied on by Adani for the purpose of informing environmental assessments and planning approvals for the proposed Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project (Purpose) and may not be used by, or relied on by any person other than Adani. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing the Report were limited to those specifically detailed in Section 1.4 and 1.5 of the Report. The Report is based on conditions encountered and information reviewed, including assumptions made by GHD, at the time of preparing the Report. Assumptions made by GHD are contained through the Report and that the information provided to GHD is accurate. To the maximum extent permitted by law GHD expressly disclaims responsibility for or liability arising from: any error in, or omission in connection with assumptions, or reliance on the Report by a third party, or use of this Report other than for the Purpose. ii | GHD | Report for Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project SEIS – Offsite Infrastructure Ecological Assessment, 41/26422/03 Executive summary In March 2013, Adani Mining Pty Ltd (Adani) commissioned an assessment of terrestrial and aquatic ecological values within and adjacent to an area proposed for offsite infrastructure for the Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project (the Project). This assessment has been undertaken as part of a Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to provide information on areas that were not assessed during the original EIS. Desktop and field surveys were undertaken within a 7187.2 ha area of investigation, referred herein as the ‘Study Area’, an area within Lot 662 on PH1491 east of the Project (Mine), encompassing the following proposed offsite infrastructure: Worker accommodation village and airport Industrial precinct including rail siding An off-stream storage and pump station near Belyando River 5 gigalitre (GL) storage dam This report presents a summary of the existing ecological values within the Study Area, based on the results of desktop and field investigations. An additional piece of infrastructure (Moray- Carmichael Road realignment) was added to the Project (Offsite) after field surveys were completed. Wherever possible, desktop information on that area has been incorporated in this report. The report also presents a review of potential impacts that construction and operation of the Project (Offsite) may have on the ecological values of the Study Area and outlines measures to manage and mitigate those potential impacts. Field surveys of the Study Area were undertaken between 28 April 2013 and 6 May 2013, coinciding with the late wet / early dry season. Flora and fauna surveys incorporated: 10 comprehensive and 49 rapid flora assessment sites 2 comprehensive and 38 rapid terrestrial fauna assessment sites 12 rapid aquatic (flora and fauna) assessment sites Additional targeted survey for threatened species including: – 23 hrs of dam watches and 2,016 hrs of remote camera to detect the black-throated finch (southern) (Poephila cincta cincta) – 320 km of driving transects, 23 hrs of dam watches and 2,016 hrs of remote camera to detect the squatter pigeon (southern) (Geophaps scripta scripta) – 21 hrs of diurnal active search and 24 hrs of nocturnal active search for brigalow associated reptiles: yakka skink (Egernia rugosa), ornamental snake (Denisonia maculata) A description of the existing terrestrial ecological values of the Study Area, based on the results of the desktop assessment and field studies is provided. The key findings from this terrestrial and aquatic ecological assessment are summarised below. GHD | Report for Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project SEIS – Offsite Infrastructure Ecological Assessment, 41/26422/03 | iii Study Area in the landscape The Study Area occurs in an agricultural landscape, where historic and current land use practices associated with cattle grazing have altered the extent, connectivity and ecological integrity of vegetation communities and the habitats they provide. Furthermore, disturbances associated with introduced plant and animal species are a feature of this agricultural landscape. The Project (Offsite) footprint has been located in a predominantly cleared landscape, which is subject to ongoing cattle grazing. Vegetation communities and fauna habitats at Study Area Remnant vegetation occurs over approximately 4.5 percent of the Study Area (approximately 322.5 ha of the 7187.2 ha). Where remnant vegetation occurs, an assortment of habitat resources are available for fauna, in contrast with surrounding areas that have been previously cleared. Seven broad vegetation communities were identified in the Study Area based on the particular vegetation communities and land forms present. A total of 14 field verified regional ecosystems (REs) were identified within the Study Area, 5 from the Desert Uplands bioregion and 9 from the Brigalow Belt bioregion. Cleared land dominates much of the Study Area. Remnant vegetation persists as isolated remnants in the floodplain between Eight Mile Creek and Obungeena Creek and in narrow fringes lining North Creek and Eight Mile Creek. These areas retain structural elements that provide habitat and resources for a variety of terrestrial and aquatic fauna. However, the ecological value of these remnants has been limited by past fragmentation and associated isolation and edge effects. A total of eight fauna habitat types were identified within the Study Area. Open cleared land was the most widespread fauna habitat type at the Study Area. Although lacking the structural complexity of other habitat types, this habitat retains foraging resources for a number of rangeland species. Fauna species diversity was higher in habitat types associated with remnant vegetation, where the structural complexity provided by remnant vegetation and ground-level substrates increases the diversity of resources and microhabitats available. A review of the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP) Biodiversity Planning Assessment (BPA) mapping indicated that remnant vegetation within and surrounding the Study Area has low to moderate value for both ecosystem diversity and context and connection. The Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) listed threatened ecological community (TEC), Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant), was confirmed present within the Study Area during field surveys. Approximately 9.8 ha of this TEC was confirmed from the occurrence of REs 11.3.1 and 11.4.9 within the Study Area. None of this TEC occurs within the Project (Offsite) footprint. Approximately 9.8 ha of endangered REs (11.3.1, 11.4.9), 220.6 ha of of concern REs (11.3.3, 11.4.11, 11.4.5, 11.4.6) and 102.1 ha of least concern RE (10.3.28, 10.3.6, 10.5.5, 10.3.4, 10.3.3, 10.3.14, 11.3.25, 11.3.37, 10.4.5, 11.3.10) were confirmed present within the Study Area (based on field-verified RE mapping). Approximately 7.2 ha of least concern RE (10.3.6, 10.3.28, 10.5.5, 10.4.5, 11.3.25, 11.3.37) occurs within the Project (Offsite) footprint. No State mapped essential habitat occurs in the Study Area. iv | GHD | Report for Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project SEIS – Offsite Infrastructure Ecological Assessment, 41/26422/03 Flora species Field studies identified 172 native flora taxa and 28 introduced taxa in the Study Area. Of the 28 introduced species, 4 are declared Weeds of National Significance (WONS) and declared weeds under the Queensland Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route) Management Act 2002 (LP Act). No threatened flora species were recorded within the Study Area from field surveys. Aquatic flora and fauna species Field surveys identified 18 native fish species, 4 bivalve species, 1 crustacean species and 1 turtle species. A total of nine aquatic plants were identified. No threatened aquatic species were recorded within the Study Area. Terrestrial fauna species Field studies identified 155 native terrestrial fauna species and 5 introduced fauna. The majority of fauna species recorded from the Study Area were common, widely distributed species. Pest species recorded in low densities included the cane toad (Rhinella marina), wild dog (Canis lupus familiaris), cat (Felis catus), rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and pig (Sus scrofa). Threatened fauna species recorded in field surveys of the Study Area included: 3 EPBC Act listed species: – black-throated finch (southern) (Poephila cincta cincta) – endangered under the EPBC Act / NC Act – squatter pigeon (southern) (Geophaps scripta scripta) – vulnerable under the EPBC Act / NC Act – ornamental snake (Denisonia maculata) – vulnerable under the EPBC / NC Act 2 bird species listed as migratory under the EPBC Act 15 bird species listed as marine under the EPBC Act 5 NC Act listed fauna species (the 3 EPBC listed species above and: – Black-necked stork (Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) – near threatened under the NC Act – Cotton pygmy goose (Nettapus coromandelianus) – near threatened under the NC Act Potential habitat occurring within and beyond the Study Area for these species was identified. Two additional EPBC Act listed fauna
Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay)
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Potential-Use-For-Groundwater
    i Professor Peter Cook 84 Richmond Avenue Colonel Light Gardens SA 5041 [email protected] Professor Derek Eamus School of Life Sciences University of Technology Sydney PO Box 123 Sydney NSW 2007 [email protected] Cover Photo: Open woodland vegetation in the Ti Tree Basin. ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 9 2. METHODOLOGIES TO INFER GROUNDWATER USE .......................................................... 11 2.1 Direct Measurements of Rooting Depth 11 2.2 Soil Water Potentials 12 2.3 Leaf and Soil Water Potentials 13 2.4 Stable Isotopes 2H and 18O 14 2.5 Depth of Water Use and Groundwater Access 16 2.6 Green Islands 17 2.7 Transpiration Rates 19 2.8 Tree Rings 20 2.9 Dendrometry 22 2.10 13C of Sapwood 22 3. GROUNDWATER AND VEGETATION IN THE TI TREE BASIN .............................................. 24 3.1 Geography and Climate 24 3.2 Groundwater Resources 27 3.3 Vegetation Across the Ti Tree Basin 29 4. TI TREE BASIN GDE STUDIES ............................................................................................. 32 4.1 Transpiration and Evapotranspiration Rates 32 4.2 Soil Water Potentials 35 4.3 Leaf Water Potentials 38 4.4 Stable Isotopes 43 4.5 Sapwood 13C and Leaf Vein Density 44 5. OTHER ARID ZONE STUDIES .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WRA Species Report
    Family: Sterculiaceae Taxon: Brachychiton populneus Synonym: Poecilodermis populnea Schott & Endl. (basio Common Name: bottletree Sterculia diversifolia G. Don bottelboom kurrajong whiteflower kurrajong Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: EVALUATE Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 6 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 n 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Preservation Winter 2011.Indd
    Linda Dennis, Regional Advisor WPSA The northern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus krefftii) is one of Australia’s most mysterious animals. Only a hundred or so people have been lucky enough to see one in the wild, and there are none in captivity anywhere in the world. Predator proof fence around Epping Forest. Photo: Linda Dennis In recent years, however, the northern it makes it into the Top 10 of the Xstrata donated a massive $3 million hairy-nosed wombat has become world’s most endangered animals. to assist in the translocation of just that little bit more known in some wombats from Epping Forest Australia and around the world – Every two or so years a northern to the Richard Underwood Nature but unfortunately for all the wrong hairy-nosed hair census is carried out. Refuge, near St George in southern reasons. It is Australia’s second most Volunteers from all corners of Australia Queensland to form a second colony. endangered animal, the rst being – and even the world – converge on the Gilbert’s potoroo of Western Epping Forest National Park (Scienti c) A brief history of the northern Australia. in central Queensland for two weeks to hairy-nosed wombat walk the length of the park, collecting The northern hairy-nosed wombat wombat hair, measuring footprints and Fossil records show that the has the dubious honour of making it counting wombat poo. northern hairy-nosed wombat was to more than one endangered listing: once widespread, living in Victoria, The results of the 2007 hair census New South Wales and Queensland • Endangered in Queensland proclaimed that there are only 138 (DERM).
    [Show full text]
  • FT Fitzroy Region Plant Index
    Fitzroy Region Plant Index Common name Species name Page Angleton grass* Dichanthium aristatum cv. Floren FT01, FT02, FT05, FT11, FT13, FT16, FT19, FT23, FT29 armgrass Urochloa spp. (syn. Brachiaria FT17, FT22, FT30 spp.) balloon cottonbush Gomphocarpus physocarpus FT13 Bambasti panic* Panicum coloratum FT01, FT02, FT05, FT11, FT13, FT19, FT23 barbwire grass Cymbopogon refractus FT04, FT12, FT13, FT14, FT15, FT16, FT19, FT20, FT21, FT22, FT24, FT27, FT28, FT30 bauhinia Lysiphyllum sp. FT01, FT03, FT06, FT11, FT19, FT24, FT29 belah Casuarina cristata FT06 bellyache bush* Jatropha gossypiifolia FT09 bendee Acacia catenulata FT17 Bisset creeping bluegrass Bothriochloa insculpta see creeping bluegrass* black speargrass Heteropogon contortus FT02, FT03, FT04, FT07, FT08, FT10, FT12, FT13, FT14, FT15, FT16, FT19, FT20, FT21, FT22, FT24, FT25, FT26, FT27, FT28, FT30, FT31 black tea tree Melaleuca bracteata FT19, FT23 black wattle Acacia salicina FT19 blackbutt Eucalyptus cambageana FT04, FT16 blackdown yellow-jacket Corymbia bunites FT15 blady grass Imperata cylindrica FT08, FT10 bloodwood Corymbia clarksoniana, FT03, FT14, FT20, FT21, FT23, FT28, C. erythrophloia FT24 blue gum Eucalyptus tereticornis FT08, FT02 bonewood Macropteranthes leichhardtii FT06, FT29 boonaree Alectryon oleifolium FT19 bottletree Brachychiton rupestris FT06, FT29 Land types of Queensland - 1 - Fitzroy Region Version 3.1 Common name Species name Page bottlewasher grasses Enneapogon spp. FT02, FT04, FT12, FT14, FT15, FT17, FT19, FT20, FT21, FT22, FT23, FT24, FT25, FT28,
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description 2010 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of the Environment does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. The ‘Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site: Final Report’ is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This report should be attributed as ‘BMT WBM. (2010). Ecological Character Description of the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site. Prepared for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.’ The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms
    toxins Article Rapid Radiations and the Race to Redundancy: An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms Timothy N. W. Jackson 1, Ivan Koludarov 1, Syed A. Ali 1,2, James Dobson 1, Christina N. Zdenek 1, Daniel Dashevsky 1, Bianca op den Brouw 1, Paul P. Masci 3, Amanda Nouwens 4, Peter Josh 4, Jonathan Goldenberg 1, Vittoria Cipriani 1, Chris Hay 1, Iwan Hendrikx 1, Nathan Dunstan 5, Luke Allen 5 and Bryan G. Fry 1,* 1 Venom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (T.N.W.J.); [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (S.A.A.); [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (C.N.Z.); [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (B.o.d.B.); [email protected] (J.G.); [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (I.H.) 2 HEJ Research Institute of Chemistry, International Centre for Chemical and Biological Sciences (ICCBS), University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan 3 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 4 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (A.N.); [email protected] (P.J.) 5 Venom Supplies, Tanunda, South Australia 5352, Australia; [email protected] (N.D.); [email protected] (L.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-4-0019-3182 Academic Editor: Nicholas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Land Clearing
    Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland January 2003 WWF Australia Report Authors: Dr Hal Cogger, Professor Hugh Ford, Dr Christopher Johnson, James Holman & Don Butler. Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr Hal Cogger Australasian region” by the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. He is a WWF Australia Trustee Dr Hal Cogger is a leading Australian herpetologist and former member of WWF’s Scientific Advisory and author of the definitive Reptiles and Amphibians Panel. of Australia. He is a former Deputy Director of the Australian Museum. He has participated on a range of policy and scientific committees, including the Dr Christopher Johnson Commonwealth Biological Diversity Advisory Committee, Chair of the Australian Biological Dr Chris Johnson is an authority on the ecology and Resources Study, and Chair of the Australasian conservation of Australian marsupials. He has done Reptile & Amphibian Specialist Group (IUCN’s extensive research on herbivorous marsupials of Species Survival Commission). He also held a forests and woodlands, including landmark studies of Conjoint Professorship in the Faculty of Science & the behavioural ecology of kangaroos and wombats, Mathematics at the University of Newcastle (1997- the ecology of rat-kangaroos, and the sociobiology of 2001). He is a member of the International possums. He has also worked on large-scale patterns Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and is a in the distribution and abundance of marsupial past Secretary of the Division of Zoology of the species and the biology of extinction. He is a member International Union of Biological Sciences. He is of the Marsupial and Monotreme Specialist Group of currently the John Evans Memorial Fellow at the the IUCN Species Survival Commission, and has Australian Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plant Species List of Plant Species
    List of plant species List of Plant Species Contents Amendment history .......................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Application ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Relationship with planning scheme ..................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Aim ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Who should use this manual? ............................................................................................. 3 2 Special consideration ....................................................................................................................... 3 3 Variations ......................................................................................................................................... 4 4 Relationship ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix A – Explanatory notes & definitions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 ENUMERATION
    Chapter 6 ENUMERATION . ENUMERATION The spermatophytic plants with their accepted names as per The Plant List [http://www.theplantlist.org/ ], through proper taxonomic treatments of recorded species and infra-specific taxa, collected from Gorumara National Park has been arranged in compliance with the presently accepted APG-III (Chase & Reveal, 2009) system of classification. Further, for better convenience the presentation of each species in the enumeration the genera and species under the families are arranged in alphabetical order. In case of Gymnosperms, four families with their genera and species also arranged in alphabetical order. The following sequence of enumeration is taken into consideration while enumerating each identified plants. (a) Accepted name, (b) Basionym if any, (c) Synonyms if any, (d) Homonym if any, (e) Vernacular name if any, (f) Description, (g) Flowering and fruiting periods, (h) Specimen cited, (i) Local distribution, and (j) General distribution. Each individual taxon is being treated here with the protologue at first along with the author citation and then referring the available important references for overall and/or adjacent floras and taxonomic treatments. Mentioned below is the list of important books, selected scientific journals, papers, newsletters and periodicals those have been referred during the citation of references. Chronicles of literature of reference: Names of the important books referred: Beng. Pl. : Bengal Plants En. Fl .Pl. Nepal : An Enumeration of the Flowering Plants of Nepal Fasc.Fl.India : Fascicles of Flora of India Fl.Brit.India : The Flora of British India Fl.Bhutan : Flora of Bhutan Fl.E.Him. : Flora of Eastern Himalaya Fl.India : Flora of India Fl Indi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nursery Industry - Protecting Our Environment 1) Contents
    A Guide for Gardeners in South Queensland South West West The Nursery Industry - Protecting Our Environment 1) Contents 1. Contents 2. Area Map 3. Acknowledgements 4. Introduction from the Ministers 5. Introduction 6. What is Grow Me Instead? 7. Establishing the criteria for Grow Me Instead 8. What you can do! 9. Controlling weeds 10. The invasive plants and their alternatives Trees and Shrubs Climbing and Ground Cover Plants Berried Plants Grasses Bulbous Plants Succulent Plants Aquatic Plants 11 . Invasive plant index 12 . Further information and additional resources The publication of the Grow Me Instead Queensland South West guide has been generously supported by Queensland Murray ‐ Darling Committee and Tara and District Landcare. Funded by: 2 Cover photo courtesy of Queensland Murray - Darling Committee 2) Area Map The publication of the Grow Me Instead Queensland South West guide has been generously supported by South West NRM Ltd. 3 3) Acknowledgements The Grow Me Instead South West project has been completed by NGIQ through the generous funding support of the following organisations; Funded by: 4 The ‘Grow Me Instead’ (GMI) project was first initiated by the Nursery and Garden Industry of NSW & ACT (NGINA) as a voluntary partnership with its member nurseries to encourage the removal from production and sale of plants known to be invasive in the natural environment. The original Grow Me Instead Queensland project was supported by funding from Australian Government NRM Team GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Ph 1 800 552008 (Toll Free) Web www.nrm.gov.au Special thanks go to Grow Me Instead project coordinator Barry Naylor (NGIQ) and project manager John McDonald (Nursery Industry Development Manager NGIQ).
    [Show full text]