DOCSLIB.ORG

Newsletter of the Ecological Consultants Associationof NSW Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newsletter of the Ecological Consultants Associationof NSW Inc Newsletter of the Ecological Consultants Association of NSW Inc. enforced and a reform process ‘price-fixing’ or fee structures. is being introduced that will Rather, we should be able to change the way land is show that the standard of assessed. service maintained by its members ensures the best Added to this ferment is the possible result for the constant problem of survival consumer. I’m sure that all of in an increasingly competitive us have had the opportunity commercial world. There of fixing up messes brought seems to be more people about by inadequate entering the ecological field consultants. If we maintain than ever before. In a free- the highest standards then Volume 10, December 2004 enterprise world this is those requiring ecological ISSN 1449-6720 considered a good thing, as assessments will be beating a more competition brings path to our door. benefits to the consumer by Inside this Issue driving prices down. The 2004 Conference President’s Message 1-2 However, the result can be demonstrated the skills that the service is of available within the ECA, and ECA Office Bearers 2 increasingly poor quality, as emphasised the knowledge 2004 ECA Conference 2-4 corners are cut and the required to correctly The Ehrharta Fetish 5-6 cheaper tenderers lack the undertake flora and fauna skills and knowledge required surveys. As I mentioned at the Life in the Trenches 7-8 to provide a satisfactory result. Conference, all planning To Survey or not to 8-12 Such a situation has already decisions pertaining to the Survey occurred in other professions, natural environment are Road killed reptiles 12 notably building and electrical ultimately based upon wanted industries. Some of those knowledge of that entering the ecological environment. Such consulting field are poorly knowledge comes from the President’s Message trained and lack the results of flora and fauna experience needed to guide an surveys and ability of the The Japanese have an assessment through the surveyor to interpret that data. expression “we live in necessary regulatory steps or Each speaker showed how effervescent times”. For to fully understand the natural complex and important was ecological consultants 2004 has history of an area. the task of describing and certainly been an effervescent assessing the natural year. Changes to the How do we, as responsible environment. Threatened Species professional ecological Conservation Act are now consultants, counter this Thanks are very much due to coming into place, conditions trend? The Association should the organisers of the to Scientific Licences are being not enter into the world of Conference, which has been the most successful (in terms consultants) are passed onto Deryk Engel of attendance) so far. Thank those maintaining the highest [email protected] you Danny, Karen and Margot standards i.e. members of the for bringing together such an ECA. Keith Kendall expert group of speakers. I [email protected] should think that the resultant Finally, have a Merry Xmas or CD will be used as a reference what ever and don’t work too Judith Rawling tool for many years to come. hard during the break. [email protected] The attendance by several Martin Denny Nick Skelton representatives from the DEC [email protected] also helped in re-establishing a connection with this agency. ECA Office Bearers Ray Williams We have been asked to [email protected] provide two representatives 2005 from the ECA to be part of a Danny Wotherspoon working committee assisting President: Martin Denny [email protected] in the development of the [email protected] accreditation process for Special appointments: consultants undertaking both 1st Vice-President: Leong Lim Species Impact Statements and [email protected] Web page: Stefan Rose Tests of Significance (i.e. the 8- [email protected] part test), and the survey 2nd Vice-President: Stefan standards. It is hoped that we Rose Newsletter editor: Gerry Swan can have some influence on [email protected] [email protected] the process. Secretary: Elizabeth Ashby So, what do we need to look [email protected] forward to in 2005? 2004 ECA Treasurer: Paul Burcher Conference We need to maintain our high [email protected] standards and educate our The 2004 ECA Conference was clients that price is not all that Membership Officer: Paul entitled “Survey Techniques matters. Burcher towards industry standards [email protected] for flora and fauna” and was We need to revisit the matter held on Friday 19th November of accreditation and determine Public Officer: Paul Burcher in the Hallstrom Theatre, whether the ECA needs to go [email protected] Australian Museum, 6 College down this path. St, Sydney. We need to attract more Councillors: members to ECA, so that it is The subject matter of the possible to ensure that a high Stephen Ambrose conference was of particular quality of professionalism is [email protected] interest to all concerned and maintained. this contributed to the huge Jason Berrigan success of the conference. It We need to ensure that some [email protected] was aimed at informing and of the new opportunities supporting ecological opening for ecological Mark Couston consultants, local council consultants (e.g. accredited [email protected] planning and environment consultants to be used in the staff and DEC staff. biodiversity certification Elizabeth Denny Presentations addressed the process; court appointed [email protected] 2 problems we all encounter in conservation planning and for the great pocket sized field ecological consulting work, programs, including reform of guide on NSW reptiles. He viz. juggling best survey Threatened Species and has written several other techniques with time and Aboriginal Heritage books, including a revised financial constraints. protection; regulation of air, guide with Glenn Shea and noise, and water emissions, Ross Sadlier, called “A field We filled the 150-seat and waste management; guide to the reptiles of NSW”. Hallstrom theatre, with 122 regulation of contaminated Gerry is a research associate of attendees apart from speakers land, State forestry activities, the Australian Museum and a and organizers, comprising 79 and radiation safety; DEC former editor of the journal consultants, 21 Council staff, participation in environmental Herpetofauna. 19 agency, 1 community planning and assessment. group, 1 student, 1 TAFE, and Dr Karen Thumm (Frogs) they traveled from all over Dr Cate McElroy (Mammals) Karen’s research has been NSW. Cate McElroy has been mainly on threatened frogs working at Australian and in particular how The aim was to achieve a basis Museum Business Services for differences in the life history on which ecological the past eight years, during strategy of frogs should be consultants can be confident which time she has been influencing our decisions that a reasonable attempt has involved with, and has about how to manage them. been made to assess the managed, a wide range of Karen is now working as a impacts of a proposal, projects for both private clients consultant; she appears to still including techniques, effort and government agencies. In prefer to be up to her knees in and timing of the survey. addition to consulting Cate a swamp than in the office. has conducted two research The following speakers put in projects that have investigated a great deal of time and effort Dr Stephen Ambrose (Birds) aspects of mammalian and presented interesting, reproductive strategies, firstly Stephen is principal of the practical and helpful papers: on the Eastern Pygmy-possum consulting company Ambecol, and other small possum and is best known as a bird Simon A Y Smith species for her Honours ecologist. He was Research (Keynote speaker) Degree from the University of and Conservation Director of Simon is the Deputy Director Melbourne, and then on Euros ‘Birds Australia’ and lectures General of the Environment in the semi-arid zone for her in ecology at the UTS in Protection and Regulation PhD from the University of Sydney and at the Australian Division, of the Department of NSW. Catholic University. Environment and Conservation NSW (DEC). Cate presented a summary of Glenn Hoye (Bats) DEC is the State Government a review that AMBS Department, which brings conducted for the Department Glenn has been surveying and together the Environment of Environment and Heritage researching bats throughout Protection Authority, the that forms the first stage of the eastern Australia for over National Parks and Wildlife process to draft Standard 25 years. Through his Service, Resource NSW, and Survey Methods for detecting company Fly By Night Bat the Royal Botanic Gardens and EPBC Act listed terrestrial, Surveys Pty Ltd he undertakes Domain Trust, and also links non-flying mammals. surveys and assessments of with the work of the Sydney bats and provides advice on Catchment Authority. Simon Gerry Swan (Reptiles) their conservation and leads the DEC’s Environment management. Gerry works as a consultant, Protection and Regulation and is probably best known Division responsible for: Michael Murphy (Terrestrial occasionally ventures into statewide recovery programs. Invertebrates - Mitchell's somewhat more alien habitats. Most recently, the Biodiversity Rainforest Snail) Management Unit has been Dr Robert Close (Koalas) involved in the reforms to the Michael has worked in various Threatened Species positions in the NPWS (now Robert started marsupial Conservation Act and their DEC) for about 10 years, and studies with a PhD project on main task will now be has an excellent why bandicoots lose a sex implementing the new understanding of conservation chromosome, then studied the changes to the Act. planning, threatened fauna taxonomy of bandicoots and habitat requirements and rock wallabies. He then spent Amanda Paul (ACEC) associated survey and site a year in the Galapagos assessments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay)
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description 2010 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of the Environment does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. The ‘Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site: Final Report’ is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This report should be attributed as ‘BMT WBM. (2010). Ecological Character Description of the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site. Prepared for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.’ The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms
    toxins Article Rapid Radiations and the Race to Redundancy: An Investigation of the Evolution of Australian Elapid Snake Venoms Timothy N. W. Jackson 1, Ivan Koludarov 1, Syed A. Ali 1,2, James Dobson 1, Christina N. Zdenek 1, Daniel Dashevsky 1, Bianca op den Brouw 1, Paul P. Masci 3, Amanda Nouwens 4, Peter Josh 4, Jonathan Goldenberg 1, Vittoria Cipriani 1, Chris Hay 1, Iwan Hendrikx 1, Nathan Dunstan 5, Luke Allen 5 and Bryan G. Fry 1,* 1 Venom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (T.N.W.J.); [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (S.A.A.); [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (C.N.Z.); [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (B.o.d.B.); [email protected] (J.G.); [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (I.H.) 2 HEJ Research Institute of Chemistry, International Centre for Chemical and Biological Sciences (ICCBS), University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan 3 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 4 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (A.N.); [email protected] (P.J.) 5 Venom Supplies, Tanunda, South Australia 5352, Australia; [email protected] (N.D.); [email protected] (L.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-4-0019-3182 Academic Editor: Nicholas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland
    Summary of an Observational Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland Graham Armstrong – May, 2016 Objective - to provide an updated and more complete list of the herpetofauna recorded from Bimblebox Nature Refuge. Approach - 1. Review available data and records pertaining to the herpetofauna at Bimblebox Nature Refuge. 2. Visit Bimblebox Nature Refuge during Spring, Summer and Autumn seasons to make observational and photographic records of the herpetofauna observed. Methodology - In order to maximise the number of species recorded, 3 successive 2.5 day visits were made to BNR, one in September 2015, Jan 2016 and the end of April 2016. This approach potentially broadens the range of weather conditions experienced and hence variety of reptiles and amphibians encountered when compared to a single field visit. Survey methodology involved walking and driving around the nature refuge during the day and after dark (with the aid of a head torch to detect eye-shine). Active reptiles including those that ran for or from cover while passing by were recorded. Frequently, in situ photographic evidence of individuals was obtained and the photographs are available for the purpose of corroborating identification. To avoid any double counting of individual animals the Refuge was traversed progressively and the locations of animals were recorded using a GPS. During any one visit no area was traversed twice and when driving along tracks, reptiles were only recorded the first time a track was traversed unless a new species was detected at a later time. Available Records The most detailed list of reptiles and amphibians recorded as occurring on Bimblebox Nature Reserve comes from the standardised trapping program of Eric Vanderduys of CSIRO in Townsville.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Atlas’, a Coal Seam Gas Field in the Surat Basin
    7 — APPENDICES Appendix C – ERM Ecological Assessment Report Public—24 October 2018 © Jemena Limited Atlas Lateral Project Gas Compression Facility Ecological Assessment Report 0461545_FINAL September 2018 The business of sustainability Atlas Lateral Project Approved by: Dr David Dique Gas Compression Facility Ecological Assessment Report Position: Partner Senex Energy Limited Signed: September 2018 0461545 FINAL Date: 21 September 2018 www.erm.com This disclaimer, together with any limitations specified in the report, apply to use of this report. This report was prepared in accordance with the contracted scope of services for the specific purpose stated and subject to the applicable cost, time and other constraints. In preparing this report, ERM relied on: (a) client/third party information which was not verified by ERM except to the extent required by the scope of services, and ERM does not accept responsibility for omissions or inaccuracies in the client/third party information; and (b) information taken at or under the particular times and conditions specified, and ERM does not accept responsibility for any subsequent changes. This report has been prepared solely for use by, and is confidential to, the client and ERM accepts no responsibility for its use by other persons. This report is subject to copyright protection and the copyright owner reserves its rights. This report does not constitute legal advice. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 2 1.2 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT 2 2 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 5 3 ASSESSMENT APPROACH
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Report Lot 2AB132 and 3AB51 Report
    Ecology Assessment Report Lot 2AB132 and 3AB51 Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Team Leader. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Team Leader. Doc Ref: Q-4200-15-RP-1002 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 90 Approvals, Land & Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 2AB132 and 3AB51 Report Table of Contents 1. Definitions & Abbreviations ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Tertiary Elapid Snakes (Squamata, Colubroidea)
    Geobios 36 (2003) 573–601 www.elsevier.com/locate/geobio Mid-Tertiary elapid snakes (Squamata, Colubroidea) from Riversleigh, northern Australia: early steps in a continent-wide adaptive radiation Serpents élapidés (Squamata, Colubroidea) du Tertiaire moyen de Riversleigh, Nord de l’Australie : étapes précoces d’une radiation adaptive répandue sur un continent entier John D. Scanlon a,*,1, Michael S.Y. Lee b, Michael Archer c a Vertebrate Palaeontology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia b Department of Environmental Biology, University of Adelaide, Department of Palaeontology, The South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia c Directorate, The Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney 2010, Australia, and Vertebrate Palaeontology Laboratory, School of Biological, Ecological and Earth Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia Received 14 May 2002; accepted 2 December 2002 Abstract Vertebral and cranial remains of elapid snakes have been collected from fossil assemblages at Riversleigh, north-west Queensland, Australia; most are Miocene but one may be late Oligocene and another as young as Pliocene. The oldest specimen (probably the oldest elapid yet known anywhere) is a vertebra that can be referred provisionally to the extant taxon Laticauda (Hydrophiinae, sensu Slowinski and Keogh, 2000), implying that the basal divergences among Australasian hydrophiine lineages had occurred by the early Miocene, in contrast to most previous estimates for the age of this geographically isolated adaptive radiation. Associated vertebrae and jaw elements from a Late Miocene deposit are described as Incongruelaps iteratus nov. gen. et sp., which has a unique combination of unusual derived characters otherwise found separately in several extant hydrophiine taxa that are only distantly related.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Condition Assessment for Grazing Lands
    finalreportp Project code: NBP.231 Teresa Eyre1, Annie Kelly1, Daniel Ferguson1, Col Paton2, Michael Mathieson1, Prepared by: Giselle Whish2, Melanie Venz1, Jane Hamilton2, Jian Wang1, Rosalie Buck1 and Luke Hogan1 1. Department of Environment and Resource Management 2. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation Date published: October 2011 ISBN: 9781741916393 PUBLISHED BY Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Biodiversity Condition Assessment for Grazing Lands Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Biodiversity Condition Assessment for Grazing Lands Abstract The primary purpose of the project was to develop and test a prototype procedure for the assessment of biodiversity condition of grazing lands. This would then complement the grazing land condition assessment framework used by the Grazing Land Management education package, which promotes sustainable management of grazed lands in northern Australia. To do this, comprehensive sampling of fauna, flora, habitat features and grazing land condition indicators was conducted at 171 sites. The sample sites were stratified across three different land types of southern Queensland (soft mulga, poplar box on alluvial and brigalow belah scrub), and broad condition states.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Cape York, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Report – Lot 4ROG3414 Ecology Assessment Report
    Ecology Assessment Report – Lot 4ROG3414 Ecology Assessment Report Release notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-012 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 48 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report – Lot 4ROG3414 Ecology Assessment Report Table of contents 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HCN Proposed Reptiles Species List
    HCN Proposed Reptiles Species List All content in this publication is owned by the Herpetocultural Cooperative of NSW Complied by the HCN Committee on behalf of our members and community. Contributors to this document include representatives from: Australian Herpetological Society, Central Coast Herpetological Society, Hawkesbury Herpetological Society, Illawarra Reptile Society, Macarthur Herpetological Society, North Coast Herpetological Group, Shoalhaven Reptile Club, Turtles R Us, DoLittle Farms, Flora & Fauna Management Services, Wildexpos, and other private reptile keepers. 2 Contents: 1. Nomenclateral changes & species division 4 Turtles 4 Lizards, geckos 4 Lizards, skinks 7 Lizards, dragons 9 Lizards, goannas 11 Snakes, pythons 12 Snakes elapids 12 2. List of Coded Species 13 3. Proposed method for changes to assignment/addition of taxa to Reptile 19 License categories Addition of new species NOT native to NSW 19 Addition of new species that occur in natural populations in NSW 20 Changes in category species 20 4. Current allocation of venomous snakes to Reptile Keeper Categories 21 5. Proposal for additions of several species to current licensing categories 23 Partial list of lizards & snakes for which applications to hold or import may 25 occur Pygopods 25 Skins 25 Dragons 26 Goannas 26 Pythons 27 elapids 27 Draft species Risk Assessment Tools 29 Black spined Nobbi Dragon 29 Slater’s Ring-tailed Dragon 32 Goldfield’s Ring-tailed Dragon 35 White-lipped Two-lined Dragon 38 Arnhem Two-lined Dragon 41 Lally’s Two-lined Dragon 44 Thorny Devil 47 North-west Red-faced Turtle 49 Northern Yellow-faced Turtle 54 Painted Short-necked Turtle 57 3 The HCN notes that the proposed classification of reptiles to Reptile Keeper Classes makes no changes to the existing listings other than to remove 11 species from Class 1 to a new Code- regulated category.
    [Show full text]