The Charge of the Light Brigade

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Charge of the Light Brigade the Charge of the light Brigade raditions by MAJ (GBR A) Rupert JACkSoN t On the 22nd October 2009 the UK contin- the order was drafted by Brigadier airey gent celebrated the charge of the Light Bri- and was carried by captain Louis Edward gade, which was a charge of British cavalry nolan, who carried the further oral instruc- led by Lord cardigan against russian forces tion that the cavalry was to attack immedi- heir during the Battle of Balaclava on 25 October ately. When Lucan asked what guns were t 1854 during the crimean War. the charge of referred to, nolan is said to have indicated, the Light Brigade continues to be studied by by a wide sweep of his arm, not the cause- modern military historians and students as way redoubts but the mass of russian guns an example of what can go wrong when ac- in a redoubt at the end of the valley, around curate military intelligence is lacking and a mile away. His reasons for the misdirection orders are unclear. Sir Winston churchill, is unclear, as he was killed in the ensuing who was a keen military historian and a battle. former cavalryman, insisted on taking time In response to the order, Lucan instructed out during the Yalta conference in 1945 to cardigan to lead 673 cavalry men straight see the battlefield for himself. into the valley between the Fedyukhin rmies and the charge was made by the Light Bri- Heights and the causeway Heights, famous- a gade of the British cavalry, consisting of the ly dubbed the “Valley of death” by the poet 4th and 13th Light dragoons, 17th Lancers, tennyson. the opposing russian forces were and the 8th and 11th Hussars, under the commanded by Pavel Liprandi and included O command of Major General the Earl of car- approximately 20 battalions of infantry sup- digan. Overall command of the cavalry re- ported by over fifty artillery pieces. these sided with Lieutenant General the Earl of forces were deployed on both sides and at the Lucan. cardigan and Lucan were brothers- opposite end of the valley. Lucan himself was nat in-law who disliked each other intensely. Lu- to follow with the Heavy Brigade. can received an order from the army com- the Light Brigade set off down the valley, mander Lord raglan stating, in appaulling with cardigan out in front leading the charge. handwriting, that “Lord raglan wishes the almost at once nolan was seen to rush across cavalry to advance rapidly to the front, fol- the front, passing in front of cardigan. It may low the enemy, and try to prevent the enemy be that he had then realized the charge was carrying away the guns. Horse artillery may aimed at the wrong target and was attempt- accompany. French cavalry is on your left. ing to stop or turn the brigade, but he was Immediate.” In fact, raglan had wanted the killed by an artillery shell and the cavalry cavalry to prevent the russians taking away continued on its course. despite a withering some naval guns from the redoubts that they fire from three sides that devastated their had captured on the reverse side of the force on the ride, the Light Brigade was able causeway Heights, the hill forming the left to engage the russian forces at the end of the side of the valley (from the point of view of valley and force them back from the redoubt, the cavalry). but suffered heavy casualties and was soon raglan could see what was happening forced to retire. the surviving russian artil- from his high vantage-point on the west of lerymen returned to their guns and opened the valley, but Lucan and the cavalry were fire once again, with grape and canister, in- unaware of what was going on owing to the discriminately at the mêlée of friend and foe lie of the land where they were drawn up. before them. nrdc-ita magazine Issue14 25 Lucan failed to provide any support for action and its reckless bravery prompted the nat cardigan, and it was speculated that he was French Marshal Pierre Bosquet to state motivated by an enmity for his brother-in- “c’est magnifique, mais ce n’est pas la law that had lasted some 30 years and had guerre.” (“It is magnificent, but it is not O been intensified during the campaign up to war.”) He continued, in a rarely quoted that point. the troops of the Heavy Brigade phrase: “c’est de la folie” — “it is madness.” a entered the mouth of the valley but did not the russian commanders are said to have rmies and advance further: Lucan’s subsequent expla- initially believed that the British soldiers nation was that he saw no point in having a must have been drunk, and the reputation of second brigade mown down and that he was the British cavalry was significantly en- best positioned where he was to render as- hanced as a result of the charge, though the sistance to Light Brigade survivors return- same cannot be said for their commanders. ing from the charge. the French cavalry, the Slow communications meant that news of t chasseurs d’afrique, were more effective in the disaster did not reach the British public heir that they broke the russian line on the Fedy- until three weeks after the action. the Brit- ukhin Heights and later provided cover for ish commanders’ dispatches from the front the remaining elements of the Light Brigade were published in an extraordinary edition t as they withdrew. War correspondent Wil- of the London Gazette of 12 november 1854. raditions liam russell, who witnessed the battle, de- raglan blamed Lucan for the charge, claim- clared “our Light Brigade was annihilated by ing that “from some misconception of the or- their own rashness, and by the brutality of a der to advance, the Lieutenant-General (Lu- ferocious enemy”. can) considered that he was bound to attack at all hazards, and he accordingly ordered Major-General the Earl of cardigan to move forward with the Light Brigade.” Lucan was furious at being made a scapegoat. raglan claimed he should have exercised his discre- tion, but throughout the campaign up to that date Lucan considered raglan had allowed him no independence at all and required that his orders be followed to the letter. cardigan, who had merely obeyed orders, blamed Lu- can for giving those orders. He returned home a hero and was promoted to Inspector cardigan survived the battle. although General of the cavalry. stories circulated afterwards that he was not Lucan attempted to publish a letter refut- actually present he led the charge from the ing point by point raglan’s London Gazette front and, never looking back, did not see dispatch, but his criticism of his superior what was happening to the troops behind was not tolerated and in March 1855, Lucan him. He reached the russian guns, took part was recalled to England. the charge of the in the fight and then returned alone up the Light Brigade became a subject of consider- valley without bothering to rally or even find able controversy and public dispute on his out what had happened to the survivors. He return. He strongly rejected raglan’s version afterwards said all he could think about was of events, calling it “an imputation reflecting his rage against captain nolan, who he seriously on my professional character”. In thought had tried to take over the leadership an exchange of public correspondence print- of the charge from him. after riding back up ed in the pages of The Times, Lucan blamed the valley he considered he had done all that raglan and his deceased aide-de-camp cap- he could and then, with astonishing sang- tain nolan, who had been the actual deliv- froid, left the field and went on board his erer of the disputed order. Lucan evidently yacht in Balaclava harbour, where he ate a escaped blame for the charge, as he was champagne dinner. made a member of the Order of the Bath in the brigade was not completely destroyed, July of that same year. although he never but did suffer terribly, with 118 men killed, again saw active duty, he reached the rank of 127 wounded. after regrouping, only 195 General in 1865 and was made a Field Mar- men were still with horses. the futility of the shal in the year before his death. 26 Issue14 nrdc-ita magazine.
Recommended publications
  • Hamilton County General Sessions Court - Criminal Division 9/23/2021 Page No: 1 Trial Docket
    CJUS8023 Hamilton County General Sessions Court - Criminal Division 9/23/2021 Page No: 1 Trial Docket Thursday Trial Date: 9/23/2021 8:30:00 AM Docket #: 1825414 Defendant: ANDERSON , QUINTON LAMAR Charge: DOMESTIC ASSAULT Presiding Judge: STARNES, GARY Division: 5 Court Room: 4 Arresting Officer: SMITH, BRIAN #996, Complaint #: A 132063 2021 Arrest Date: 5/14/2021 Docket #: 1793448 Defendant: APPLEBERRY , BRANDON JAMAL Charge: AGGRAVATED ASSAULT Presiding Judge: WEBB, GERALD Division: 3 Court Room: 3 Arresting Officer: GOULET, JOSEPH #385, Complaint #: A 62533 2021 Arrest Date: 5/26/2021 Docket #: 1852403 Defendant: ATCHLEY , GEORGE FRANKLIN Charge: CRIMINAL TRESPASSING Presiding Judge: STARNES, GARY Division: 5 Court Room: 4 Arresting Officer: SIMON, LUKE #971, Complaint #: A 100031 2021 Arrest Date: 9/17/2021 Docket #: 1814264 Defendant: AVERY , ROBERT CAMERON Charge: THEFT OF PROPERTY Presiding Judge: WEBB, GERALD Division: 3 Court Room: 3 Arresting Officer: SERRET, ANDREW #845, Complaint #: A 091474 2020 Arrest Date: 9/9/2020 Docket #: 1820785 Defendant: BALDWIN , AUNDREA RENEE Charge: CRIMINAL TRESPASSING Presiding Judge: SELL, CHRISTINE MAHN Division: 1 Court Room: 1 Arresting Officer: FRANTOM, MATTHEW #641, Complaint #: M 115725 2020 Arrest Date: 11/14/2020 Docket #: 1815168 Defendant: BARBER , JUSTIN ASHLEY Charge: OBSTRUCTING HIGHWAY OR OTHER PASSAGEWAY Presiding Judge: STARNES, GARY Division: 5 Court Room: 4 Arresting Officer: LONG, SKYLER #659, Complaint #: A 094778 2020 Arrest Date: 9/18/2020 Docket #: 1812424 Defendant: BARNES
    [Show full text]
  • The Crucial Development of Heavy Cavalry Under Herakleios and His Usage of Steppe Nomad Tactics Mark-Anthony Karantabias
    The Crucial Development of Heavy Cavalry under Herakleios and His Usage of Steppe Nomad Tactics Mark-Anthony Karantabias The last war between the Eastern Romans and the Sassanids was likely the most important of Late Antiquity, exhausting both sides economically and militarily, decimating the population, and lay- ing waste the land. In Heraclius: Emperor of Byzantium, Walter Kaegi, concludes that the Romaioi1 under Herakleios (575-641) defeated the Sassanian forces with techniques from the section “Dealing with the Persians”2 in the Strategikon, a hand book for field commanders authored by the emperor Maurice (reigned 582-602). Although no direct challenge has been made to this claim, Trombley and Greatrex,3 while inclided to agree with Kaegi’s main thesis, find fault in Kaegi’s interpretation of the source material. The development of the katafraktos stands out as a determining factor in the course of the battles during Herakleios’ colossal counter-attack. Its reforms led to its superiority over its Persian counterpart, the clibonarios. Adoptions of steppe nomad equipment crystallized the Romaioi unit. Stratos4 and Bivar5 make this point, but do not expand their argument in order to explain the victory of the emperor over the Sassanian Empire. The turning point in its improvement seems to have taken 1 The Eastern Romans called themselves by this name. It is the Hellenized version of Romans, the Byzantine label attributed to the surviving East Roman Empire is artificial and is a creation of modern historians. Thus, it is more appropriate to label them by the original version or the Anglicized version of it.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th CENTURY MILITARY TRAIL
    Approx. time Friends of York Cemetery 1½ hours th 19 CENTURY MILITARY TRAIL Registered Charity One of a series of trails to enhance your enjoyment of the Cemetery No. 701091 Best enjoyed: ANYTIME INTRODUCTION This Trail provides you with an interesting walk Crimean War 1853 - 1856 around the Victorian Section of this 'Garden of Death' Indian Mutiny 1857 - 1858 (Part of the Epitaph on the Grave of Charlotte Hall Anglo- Zulu War 1879 who was the first person to be buried in York Anglo-Boer War 1899 - 1902 Cemetery) and compliments our other two Military You will visit the graves of men from all walks of life Trails which cover the WW1 & WW2 conflicts. including an Admiral, survivors of the infamous The 19th Century witnessed many overseas conflicts Charge of the Light Brigade, a recipient of the Victoria and this Trail includes survivors of a few of these Cross and a connection with Royalty. including:- It is hoped that this Trail will encourage you to seek th Peninsular War 1808 - 1814 further information about the many 19 Century Battle of Waterloo 1815 conflicts involving the British and, in doing so, Xhosa Wars 1846 – 1853 remember all those brave men who were involved in Kaffir War 1850 - 1853 them. THE TRAIL !! FOR YOU OWN SAFETY PLEASE KEEP TO THE PATHS AT ALL TIMES !! At the Cemetery Entrance follow the wide Chapel He was appointed Deputy Assistant Commissary- Drive toward the Chapel. Shortly before the Chapel General in March 1880 and on 4 October 1881 he was on your left note the dominant grey marble column sent to Trinidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Verend John Lovell Robinson,' B.A., Has Mclnnis, from the 21St Hussars, to Be Lieu- This Day Been Appointed a Chaplain in Her Tenant, Vice A
    4952 THE LONDON GAZETTE, OCTOBEE 22, 1875. Admiralty, 20th October, 1875. 9th Lancers, Lieutenant Edward Bowater The Reverend John Lovell Robinson,' B.A., has Mclnnis, from the 21st Hussars, to be Lieu- this day been appointed a Chaplain in Her tenant, vice A. L. Wheeler, retired. Dated Majesty's Fleet, with seniority of 21st July, 23rd October, 1875. 1875. 10th Hussars, Captain Walter Yeldham, from the The Reverend William Trench, B.A., has this 18th Hussars, to be Captain, vice U. E. P. day been appointed a Chaplain and Naval Okeden, who exchanges. Dated 23rd Octpber, •Instructor in Her Majesty's Fleet, with seniority 1875. of 5th October, 1875. 12th Lancers, Sub-Lieutenant William Colquhoun to be Lieutenant. Dated 12th August, 1874. 13th Hussars, Captain Frank Osborne retires from the Service, receiving the value of his War Office^ Pall Commission. Dated 23rd October, 1875. 22nd October, 1875. 14th Hussars, Lieutenant the Honourable Hugh 8th Regiment of Hussars^ Major-General Rodolph George Gpugh to be Adjutant, vice Lieutenant de Salis, C.B., to be Colonel, "vice Lieutenarit- J. Kentish, promoted. Dated 23rd-0ctober, General John Charles Hope Gibsone, trans- 1875. ferred to the Colonelcy of the 17th Lancers. 15th Hussars, Paymaster and Honorary Major Dated 22nd September, 1875. Roger Sheehy, from the 74th Foot, to be Pay- 17th Lancers, Lieutenant-General John Charles raaster^ vice Honorary Major A. B. de Lasalle, Hope Gibsone, from the 8th Hussars, to be who exchanges. Dated 23rd October, 1875. 16th Lancers, The second Christian name^of Sub- Colonel, vice, Lieutenant - General Charles : William Morley Balders, C.B,, deceased.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of Winston Churchill
    © Yousuf Karsh, 1941 Ottawa The Life of Winston Churchill: Soldier Correspondent Statesman Orator Author Inspirational Leader © The Churchill Centre 2007 Produced for educational use only. Not intended for commercial purposes. The Churchill Centre is the international focus for study of Winston Churchill, his life and times. Our members, aged from ten to over ninety, work together to preserve Winston Churchill's memory and legacy. Our aim is that future generations never forget his contribu- tions to the political philosophy, culture and literature of the Great Democracies and his contributions to statesmanship. To join or contact The Churchill Centre visit www.winstonchurchill.org Birth 1874 Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill’s ancestors were both Brit- ish and American. Winston’s father was the British Lord Randolph Churchill, the youngest son of John, the 7th Duke of Marlborough. Lord Randolph’s ancestor John Churchill made history by winning many successful military campaigns in Europe for Queen Anne almost 200 years earlier. His mother was the American Jennie Jerome. The Jeromes fought for the inde- pendence of the American colonies in George Washington’s ar- mies. Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill was born on Novem- ber 30, 1874, at the Duke of Marlborough’s large palace, Blen- Winston. as a baby. heim. Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill’s family tree John Churchill 1650-1722 1st Duke of Marlborough !" Charles 1706-1758 3rd Duke of Marlborough !" George 1739-1817 David Wilcox 4th Duke of Marlborough !" John Churchill George 1766-1840
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of the Cold War
    Timeline of the Cold War 1945 Defeat of Germany and Japan February 4-11: Yalta Conference meeting of FDR, Churchill, Stalin - the 'Big Three' Soviet Union has control of Eastern Europe. The Cold War Begins May 8: VE Day - Victory in Europe. Germany surrenders to the Red Army in Berlin July: Potsdam Conference - Germany was officially partitioned into four zones of occupation. August 6: The United States drops atomic bomb on Hiroshima (20 kiloton bomb 'Little Boy' kills 80,000) August 8: Russia declares war on Japan August 9: The United States drops atomic bomb on Nagasaki (22 kiloton 'Fat Man' kills 70,000) August 14 : Japanese surrender End of World War II August 15: Emperor surrender broadcast - VJ Day 1946 February 9: Stalin hostile speech - communism & capitalism were incompatible March 5 : "Sinews of Peace" Iron Curtain Speech by Winston Churchill - "an "iron curtain" has descended on Europe" March 10: Truman demands Russia leave Iran July 1: Operation Crossroads with Test Able was the first public demonstration of America's atomic arsenal July 25: America's Test Baker - underwater explosion 1947 Containment March 12 : Truman Doctrine - Truman declares active role in Greek Civil War June : Marshall Plan is announced setting a precedent for helping countries combat poverty, disease and malnutrition September 2: Rio Pact - U.S. meet 19 Latin American countries and created a security zone around the hemisphere 1948 Containment February 25 : Communist takeover in Czechoslovakia March 2: Truman's Loyalty Program created to catch Cold War
    [Show full text]
  • Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British-Free French Relations 1940-1941" (2019)
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2019 Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British- Free French Relations 1940-1941 Samantha Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Sullivan, Samantha, "Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British-Free French Relations 1940-1941" (2019). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 324. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/324 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Personalities and Perceptions: Churchill, De Gaulle, and British-Free French Relations 1940-1941 By: Samantha Sullivan Advised by: Drs. Steven Zdatny, Andrew Buchanan, and Meaghan Emery University of Vermont History Department Honors College Thesis April 17, 2019 Acknowledgements: Nearly half of my time at UVM was spent working on this project. Beginning as a seminar paper for Professor Zdatny’s class in Fall 2018, my research on Churchill and De Gaulle slowly grew into the thesis that follows. It was a collaborative effort that allowed me to combine all of my fields of study from my entire university experience. This project took me to London and Cambridge to conduct archival research and made for many late nights on the second floor of the Howe Library. I feel an overwhelming sense of pride and accomplishment for this thesis that is reflective of the work I have done at UVM.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Constitution of the European Union2
    European Scientific Journal August 2018 /SPECIAL/ edition ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 2 The Legal Constitution of the European Union Academic Director Dr. iur. Dr. phil. Franz-Rudolf Herber Frederic-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany Doi: 10.19044/esj.2018.c4p9 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.c4p9 Abstract World War II (1939 – 1945) was a catastrophe for the whole world and for Europe in particular. It is one of the great miracles of the 20th century that the West European war parties did draw a line and founded an economic alliance for coal and steel production. This economical alliance is based on common values and on the rule of law. A main problem of the European Union is to give a democratic legitimation to the European institutions. It is good that e.g. the European Parliament is elected directly, it is bad that e.g. the President of the European Commission is not elected directly. In some Member States of the European Union common values and common interests are only partim shared. The people of Great Britain did decide in 2016 to leave the European Union; according to the legal constitution of the European Union a leave is allowed. The main achievement of the European Union is the abolition of inter-European taxes and thus the promotion of economical relationships between the Member States of the European Union. The Euro that is the currency of (only) some Member States has become a global player. Keywords: European Union, Member States of the European Union, Treaties of the European Union, common values, common market, separation of powers, European Commission, European Parliament, President of the European Council, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, European Central Bank Introduction One should be aware of the fact what kind of brutal military violence the greatest war criminal of human history – Adolf Hitler (1883 – 1945) and his crazy followers – had brought to the former Czechoslovakia (CSSR)3.
    [Show full text]
  • PICKETT's CHARGE Gettysburg National Military Park STUDENT
    PICKETT’S CHARGE I Gettysburg National Military Park STUDENT PROGRAM U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Pickett's Charge A Student Education Program at Gettysburg National Military Park TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 How To Use This Booklet ••••..••.••...• 3 Section 2 Program Overview . • . • . • . • . 4 Section 3 Field Trip Day Procedures • • • . • • • . 5 Section 4 Essential Background and Activities . 6 A Causes ofthe American Civil War ••..•...... 7 ft The Battle ofGettysburg . • • • . • . 10 A Pi.ckett's Charge Vocabulary •............... 14 A Name Tags ••.. ... ...........• . •......... 15 A Election ofOfficers and Insignia ......•..•.. 15 A Assignm~t ofSoldier Identity •..••......... 17 A Flag-Making ............................. 22 ft Drill of the Company (Your Class) ........... 23 Section 5 Additional Background and Activities .••.. 24 Structure ofthe Confederate Army .......... 25 Confederate Leaders at Gettysburg ••.•••.••• 27 History of the 28th Virginia Regiment ....... 30 History of the 57th Virginia Regiment . .. .... 32 Infantry Soldier Equipment ................ 34 Civil War Weaponry . · · · · · · 35 Pre-Vtsit Discussion Questions . • . 37 11:me Line . 38 ... Section 6 B us A ct1vities ........................• 39 Soldier Pastimes . 39 Pickett's Charge Matching . ••.......•....... 43 Pickett's Charge Matching - Answer Key . 44 •• A .•. Section 7 P ost-V 1s1t ctivities .................... 45 Post-Visit Activity Ideas . • . • . • . • . 45 After Pickett's Charge . • • • • . • . 46 Key: ft = Essential Preparation for Trip 2 Section 1 How to Use This Booklet Your students will gain the most benefit from this program if they are prepared for their visit. The preparatory information and activities in this booklet are necessary because .. • students retain the most information when they are pre­ pared for the field trip, knowing what to expect, what is expected of them, and with some base of knowledge upon which the program ranger can build.
    [Show full text]
  • “This Is Our House!” a Preliminary Assessment of the Capitol Hill
    MARCH 2021 “This is Our House!” A Preliminary Assessment of the Capitol Hill Siege Participants Program on Extremism THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MARCH 2021 “This is Our House!” A Preliminary Assessment of the Capitol Hill Siege Participants Program on Extremism THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2021 by Program on Extremism Program on Extremism 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20006 www.extremism.gwu.edu Cover: ©REUTERS/Leah Millis TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 6 Executive Summary 8 Introduction 10 Findings 12 Categorizing the Capitol Hill Siege Participants 17 Recommendations 44 Conclusion 48 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was researched and written jointly by the research team at the Program on Extremism, including Lorenzo Vidino, Seamus Hughes, Alexander Meleagrou- Hitchens, Devorah Margolin, Bennett Clifford, Jon Lewis, Andrew Mines and Haroro Ingram. The authors wish to thank JJ MacNab for her invaluable feedback and edits on this report. This report was made possible by the Program’s team of Research Assistants—Ilana Krill, Angelina Maleska, Mia Pearsall, Daniel Stoffel, Diana Wallens, and Ye Bin Won—who provided crucial support with data collection, data verification, and final edits on the report. Finally, the authors thank Nicolò Scremin for designing this report, and Brendan Hurley and the George Washington University Department of Geography for creating the maps used in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge”
    The Army of Northern Virginia in the Gettysburg Campaign “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge” Pender’s Light Division at Gettysburg, July 1 D. Scott Hartwig It was July 1 at Gettysburg and the battle west of town had been raging furiously since 1:30 p.m. By dint of only the hardest fighting troops of Major General Henry Heth’s and Major General Robert E. Rodes’s divisions had driven elements of the Union 1st Corps from their positions along McPherson’s Ridge, back to Seminary Ridge. Here, the bloodied Union regiments and batteries hastily organized a defense to meet the storm they all knew would soon break upon them. This was the last possible line of defense beyond the town and the high ground south of it. It had to be held as long as possible. To break this last line of Union resistance, Confederate Third Corps commander, Lieutenant General Ambrose P. Hill, committed his last reserve, the division of Major General Dorsey Pender. They were the famed Light Division of the Army of Northern Virginia, boasting a battle record from the Seven Days battles to Chancellorsville unsurpassed by any other division in the army. Arguably, it may have been the best division in Lee’s army. Certainly no organization of the army could claim more combat experience. Now, Hill would call upon his old division once more to make a desperate assault to secure victory. In many ways their charge upon Seminary Ridge would be symbolic of why the Army of Northern Virginia had enjoyed an unbroken string of victories through 1862 and 1863, and why they would meet defeat at Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]
  • 10, George C. Marshall
    'The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, Department of Defense or the US Government.'" USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #10 “George C. Marshall: Global Commander” Forrest C. Pogue, 1968 It is a privilege to be invited to give the tenth lecture in a series which has become widely-known among teachers and students of military history. I am, of course, delighted to talk with you about Gen. George C. Marshall with whose career I have spent most of my waking hours since1956. Douglas Freeman, biographer of two great Americans, liked to say that he had spent twenty years in the company of Gen. Lee. After devoting nearly twelve years to collecting the papers of General Marshall and to interviewing him and more than 300 of his contemporaries, I can fully appreciate his point. In fact, my wife complains that nearly any subject from food to favorite books reminds me of a story about General Marshall. If someone serves seafood, I am likely to recall that General Marshall was allergic to shrimp. When I saw here in the audience Jim Cate, professor at the University of Chicago and one of the authors of the official history of the U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II, I recalled his fondness for the works of G.A. Henty and at once there came back to me that Marshall once said that his main knowledge of Hannibal came from Henty's The Young Carthaginian. If someone asks about the General and Winston Churchill, I am likely to say, "Did you know that they first met in London in 1919 when Marshall served as Churchill's aide one afternoon when the latter reviewed an American regiment in Hyde Park?" Thus, when I mentioned to a friend that I was coming to the Air Force Academy to speak about Marshall, he asked if there was much to say about the General's connection with the Air Force.
    [Show full text]