Translations of the Bible

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Translations of the Bible Introduction to the Bible Module 1: Lecture 6 Bible translations and Tools for Bible Study © Rosebank Bible College Last week… n In the previous lecture we had a brief introduction to the very complicated and intricate science of textual criticism n We looked at the guidelines followed by scholars in applying textual criticism to the Bible and studied some samples of how it affects our Bible text, using the NIV n The knowledge gained last time gives us even more confidence in the Bible as the Word of God! In this lecture n In this lecture we look at the need for Bible translation as well as the principles, philosophies and guidelines followed by Bible translators n We then give special attention to the English translations of the Bible n We also learn how to use some of the tools available for studying the Bible Required reading n Johnston 2006: See “Further reading” in Johnston’s Introduction, pp x-xi n Harris 2001:55-59; 63-67 (Preservation of the NT and OT); 93-100 (Helps for Bible Study) n New Bible Dictionary: Since we are dealing with issues that post-date the NT there is virtually no information in the NBD on the topics of today’s lecture Checking in n Grab a pen and paper and write out the names (in the correct order) of the NT books from Matthew to 2 Thessalonians n Once completed, check your own work n By next week you should know ALL the books of the Bible in the correct order! By way of introduction… n The Westminster Confession of Faith, drawn up in 1646, says the following (Article 1.8): “The Old Testament in Hebrew (which was the native language of the people of God of old), and the New Testament in Greek (which, at the time of the writing of it, was most generally known to the nations), being immediately inspired by God, and, by His singular care and providence, kept pure in all ages, are therefore authentic; so as, in all controversies of religion, the Church is finally to appeal unto them.” (italics added) Article (1.8) continues n “But, because these original tongues are not known to all the people of God, who have right unto, and interest in the Scriptures, and are commanded, in the fear of God, to read and search them, therefore they are to be translated in to the vulgar language of every nation unto which they come, that, the Word of God dwelling plentifully in all, they may worship Him in an acceptable manner; and, through patience and comfort of the Scriptures, may have hope.” n See http://www.reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/ for a full copy of Westminster Confession of Faith The need for Bible translation n It is clear from the Westminster Statement of Faith as well as from our own personal experience that translating the Bible is not only permitted, but absolutely ESSENTIAL in order to allow us access to the Word of God in a language that we can understand n This need was clearly recognised by the Early Church; there are several examples of the Scriptures having been translated into different languages from earliest days of Christianity (eg Coptic, Aramaic, Latin) Motivation for Bible translation n The motivation for translating the Bible can be seen from the following statement regarding Jerome’s Latin translation: n “The intention of St Jerome, translating into Latin the Hebrew of the Old Testament and the Greek of the New Testament, was that ordinary Christians of the Roman empire should be able to read the word of God. 'Ignorance of the scriptures', he wrote, 'is ignorance of Christ'.” http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?historyid=ac66 Reasons for Bible translation n Most people do not read Greek or Hebrew anymore (at least not fluently!) n Languages develop, whereas the biblical languages are regarded as “dead” (stagnant) n People need to hear God speaking to them through the Word in their own language The reasons for and need to translate the Bible, although very logical to us today, were not always recognised by everyone… Image: www.umilta.net/ege.html History of Bible translation The struggle for Bible translation Early translations of the OT n The Jews, because of their belief that the text of the Scriptures itself was sacred, by- and-large objected to any translation of the OT into another language n However, the Hebrew Targums (Aramaic translations) and Septuagint (Greek translation) are proof that the need for different translations always existed, albeit not always enjoying “official” approval Early translations of the NT n The NT (and in some cases the whole Bible) was translated into other languages from very early on in the Christian era n These languages included Coptic, Syriac, Aramaic and Latin n Jerome translated the Gospels into Latin in the late 4th Century; it is this translation that formed the basis of the well-known Latin Vulgate that dominated church life for many years Image: cpart.byu.edu/?page=94&sidebar The Latin Vulgate n The Vulgate is “largely the result of the labors of Jerome, who was commissioned by Pope Damasus I in 382 to make a revision of old Latin translations. It became the definitive and officially promulgated Latin version of the Bible of the Roman Catholic Church. In the 13th century it came to be called versio vulgata, which means ‘common translation’. There are 76 books in the Clementine edition of the Vulgate Bible: 46 in the Old Testament, 27 in the New Testament, and three in the Apocrypha.” http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgate n Jerome started the translation in 390; it was completed in 405 (not all his own work) n It was not the first or only Latin translation, but in time became the most important Image: Alcuin's Vulgate - 9th century: www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/Alcuin.htm Value of the Vulgate n In time the Vulgate came to be regarded as the only official Bible for the Church n The very high regard for the Vulgate also resulted in making the Bible less accessible to ordinary Christians, most of whom were not able to read Latin n The Vulgate is well-preserved and scribes often took care to make exact and beautiful copies, evidenced by the many copies in precise calligraphy Translations during the Middle Age n “During the Middle Ages, translation, particularly of the Old Testament was discouraged. Nevertheless, there are some fragmentary Old English Bible translations, notably a lost translation of the Gospel of John into Old English by the Venerable Bede, which he is said to have prepared shortly before his death around the year 735. An Old High German version of the gospel of Matthew dates to 748. Charlemagne in ca. 800 charged Alcuin with a revision of the Latin Vulgate. The translation into Old Church Slavonic dates to the late 9th century. n http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translation The struggle for Bible translation n “Pope Innocent III in 1199 banned unauthorized versions of the Bible as a reaction to the Cathar and Waldensian heresies. The synods of Toulouse and Tarragona (1234) outlawed possession of such renderings. There is evidence of some vernacular translations being permitted while others were being scrutinized. The most notable Middle English Bible translation, Wyclif's Bible (1383), based on the Vulgate, was banned by the Oxford Synod in 1408. A Hungarian Hussite Bible appeared in the mid 15th century, and in 1478, a Catalan translation in the dialect of Valencia.” n http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translation Image of John Wyclif: www.traditioninaction.org/OrganicSociety/A_02... Typical example of the struggle n For the most part “unofficial” translations of the Bible were not allowed during the Middle Ages n William Tyndale translated the Bible into English as early as the 16th Century, but “Tyndale's Bible (1526) was met with heavy sanctions given the widespread belief that Tyndale changed the Bible as he attempted to translate it. William Tyndale was first jailed in 1535 for translating the Old Testament without permission, and a year later was strangled and burnt at the stake.” n http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translationsImage of W Tyndale: www.kamglobal.org Dawning of a new era n The belief that the Bible should not be translated into “common languages” dominated the church throughout the Middle Ages n The Reformation changed many things, including the belief that the Bible should be accessible to all believers and not just to the learned few The Reformers n “In 1521, Martin Luther was placed under the Ban of the Empire, and he retired to the Wartburg Castle. During his time there, he translated the New Testament from Greek into German. It was printed in September 1522. The first complete Dutch Bible, partly based on the existing portions of Luther's translation, was printed in Antwerp in 1526...” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translation n Today there is little argument about the need to make the Bible available to every person in his/her heart language or mother tongue Translating the Bible Understanding the principles of Bible translation Where translators start The following factors play a role in translation: n The need for a translation into another language (or the need for a revised version) n The approach to or philosophy of translation n The best text to be used as the basis for the translation (as determined by textual criticism) n The identity and number of scholars who will work on a translation (most modern translations are done by a team of scholars) The Text of the Bible n As we discovered in the previous lecture, the science of textual criticism determines the best possible text of the Bible to be used n Although not all Bible scholars agree on which is
Recommended publications
  • The Old Greek of Isaiah Septuagint and Cognate Studies
    The Old Greek Of IsaIah Septuagint and Cognate Studies Editor Wolfgang Kraus Editorial Board Robert Hiebert Karen H. Jobes Siegfried Kreuzer Arie van der Kooij Volume 61 The Old Greek Of IsaIah The Old Greek Of IsaIah an analysIs Of ITs Pluses and MInuses MIrjaM van der vOrM-CrOuGhs SBL Press Atlanta Copyright © 2014 by SBL Press All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, SBL Press, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Van der Vorm-Croughs, Mirjam. The old Greek of Isaiah : an analysis of its pluses and minuses / Mirjam van der Vorm-Croughs. pages cm. — (Society of Biblical Literature Septuagint and cognate stud- ies ; no. 61) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58983-978-6 (paper binding : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983- 980-9 (electronic format) — ISBN 978-1-58983-979-3 (hardcover binding : alk. paper) 1. Bible. Isaiah. Greek—Versions—Septuagint. 2. Bible. Isaiah—Language, style. 3. Greek language, Biblical. 4. Hebrew language. I. Title. BS1514.G7S486 2014 224’.10486—dc23 2014010033 Printed on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997) and ISO 9706:1994 CONTENTS Preface ix Abbreviations xi CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • King James Version
    2020 English Catalog PO BOX 225646 QUALITY BIBLES . REASONABLY PRICED DALLAS TX 75222-5646 PHONE / FAX: 214-388-5111 BEAUTIFUL CRAFTSMANSHIP STRONGLY BOUND GENUINE LEATHER King James Version THESE BIBLES ARE SMYTH-SEWN and are made with fine materials and strong construction that hold up to use. We are a MISSIONARY ORGANIZATION dedicated to spreading God’s Word! NOTE: All larger Bibles come boxed in their own lovely yellow gift box! MEDIUM STUDY BIBLE BEAUTIFULLY BOUND EASY-TO-READ •CENTER CHAIN REFERENCES •SUBJECT-INDEX •CONCORDANCE MEDIUM STUDY BIBLE King James Version Order No. Color Binding Edging Other Price Includes: * 162 pages Concordance 40 LLB Brown Genuine Leather Gilded Ribbon $38.00 * 39 pages Subject-Index 40 LLBu Burgundy Genuine Leather Gilded Ribbon $38.00 * Presentation page 40 LLM Mahogany Genuine Leather Gilded Ribbon $38.00 * Family records pages * Easy reading center references * Color Maps and Study helps * Smyth-Sewn, Headbands * Size 5 ½ X 8 * 1488 PAGES 42 LLX Black Leatherette Spray Gold Ribbon $22.00 Chain Reference Study Bibles Concordance Subject-Index Bible Names King James Version Large Study Bible 1520 pages Size: 6 1/2 X 9 1/4 • Large readable center references LARGE PRINT STUDY EDITION WITH CONCORDANCE • CHAIN-references that are vital and meaningful Order No. Color Binding Edging Other Price • Page headings with a clear message • 240 pages of the BEST 53 LLX Black Imitation Leather Non-Gilded Ribbon $36.00 Concordance, Subject-Index, Bible Names • With a section at the beginning of the Bible that explains HOW TO USE all these helps... HOW to APPROACH GOD’S WORD to receive maximum benefits from it! DELUXE MEDIUM SIZE STUDY BIBLE SAME AS ABOVE Only Smaller in Size • 5 ½ X 8 ¼ Includes: * How to STUDY the Bible * MIRACLES in the Bible * PRAYERS in the Bible DELUXE MEDIUM PRINT STUDY EDITION WITH CONCORDANCE * PARABLES in the Bible Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Accurate Bible Version for Old Testament
    Most Accurate Bible Version For Old Testament Cosmoramic and dark Tymon impregnating her Wednesday betroths slumberously or set pantomimically, is Giorgi nihilist? Etiolate and Galwegian Madison scribblings her amie outstruck first-rate or cantons evanescently, is Vick choky? Unfilled and inelaborate Christy prostrates so quaveringly that Hendrik municipalises his Democritus. Although few monks in any of our greatest enemy to convey ideas and accurate version for any other It is white known to historians that gap was a common practice because that destiny for anonymously written books to be ascribed to famous people cannot give birth more authority. And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. King james version for most accurate and old testament into modern scholars! To assess their fidelity and accuracy of the Bible today compared to look original texts one must refuse the issues of translation theory and the though of the English Bible. The New Testament to ball if the verses match the meaning of rural King James. Stanley Horton being the head Theologian. How much on a very awkward literalistic translation by academic world for warren as old bible version for most accurate and to conform your comment. Whenever anyone in the New Testament was addressed from heaven, it was always in the Hebrew tongue. At times one might have wished that they had kept more of the King James text than they did, but the text is more easily understandable than the unrevised King James text would have otherwise been. The matter World Translation employs nearly 16000 English expressions to translate about 5500 biblical Greek terms and over 27000 English expressions to translate about 500 Hebrew terms.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jerusalem Version (NJV) Bible Review
    New Jerusalem Version (NJV) The following is a written summary of our full-length video review featuring excerpts, discussions of key issues ​ and texts, and lots of pictures, and is part of our Bible Review series. ​ ​ Do you recommend it? Why? Two thumbs up! The New Jerusalem Version takes first place in our list of recommended Messianic Bibles. Read on to learn why. Who's this Bible best for? The New Jerusalem Version is your best choice if you're looking for a literal translation with some Hebrew names and keywords that's respectful towards Judaism and looks like a real Bible. Would you suggest this as a primary or a secondary Bible? Why? The NJV is ideal as a primary Bible to carry around and read from on a regular basis because it contains the Scriptures from Genesis to Revelation, is literal enough to be used as a study Bible, and is large enough to be easy on the eyes when reading but not so large as to be clunky. How's this version's relationship with the Jews and Judaism? In short, excellent. The New Jerusalem Version belies a deep familiarity with Jewish customs and sensibilities. For instance, the books of the Hebrew Bible are in the Jewish order rather than how they were later rearranged by Christianity. Similarly, the books are called by both their Hebrew and English names and the chapters and verses follow the Jewish numbering with the alternative Christian numbering in brackets. Personal names and words close to the Jewish heart are also transliterated so as to retain their original resonance.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Early Biblical Translations
    * * * * * * * Three Early Biblical Translations We do not have any of the original manuscripts of the books that have been included in the Bible. All we have is copies of copies. Most of the original manuscripts of the Old Testament were written in Hebrew, although a few chapters of Ezra and Daniel were recorded in Aramaic, the language of Jesus. The books of the New Testament were first written in Greek. The first translations of the Bible were of the Hebrew Bible. The Septuagint (SEP-too-a-jint) was a Greek translation written about three centuries before the birth of Christ. Two other early translations, composed after the birth of Christ, were the Peshitta in Syriac and the Vulgate in Latin. These three translations, the Septuagint, Peshitta, and Vulgate became the official translations of the Old Testament for the Greek-, Syriac-, and Latin-speaking churches respectively. Each also became the basis for other translations of the Bible. The Septuagint The Septuagint (from the Latin word septuaginta meaning seventy) was a Greek version of the Bible created during the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (ca. 285-246 BCE) in Alexandria, Egypt for Diaspora Jews. Most of Jews living outside of Palestine were Greek-speaking as a result of Alexander the Great's (357-323 BCE) campaign to Hellenize his empire. First verses of Genesis (click for larger picture) At first, the Septuagint (LXX) consisted only of the Pentateuch (Torah, first five books of the Bible). Different books were translated from the Hebrew over a span of two centuries, including the books of the Apocrypha, and were added to the LXX.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Brock, Sebastian, the Bible in the Syriac Tradition. Second Revised
    1 Brock, Sebastian, The Bible in the Syriac Tradition. Second Revised Edition. Gorgias Handbooks, no. 7. Piscataway: Gorgias Press, 2006. Pp. x + 178. ISBN: 1-59333-300-5. $29.00 USD. 1. Written by the world’s leading Syriac scholar, this unique resource is a comprehensive survey of matters pertaining to the Bible in Syriac. Dealing with both testaments equally, with all translations, with manuscripts, with the history of interpretation, and with general topics relating to the Bible, it has something that will be of interest to a wide variety of readers. Its non- technical style makes it ideal as an introductory textbook, but it also has enough detail to be of interest to every specialist. This is a fairly fast read, made quicker still by the fact that just over a sixth of the 178-page body of the work is taken up with blank pages or title pages of chapters. 2. The book is divided into two parts and is concluded by an extensive bibliography (pp. 155–78) categorizing publications under seven heads: editions, tools, translations, studies, lectionaries, exegesis, and aspects of reception history. The first part, which is free of footnotes, is a thorough expansion of the 1988 booklet with the same title as the current work. The second part is based on material from the third volume of The Hidden Pearl: The Syrian Orthodox Church and its Ancient Aramaic Heritage (Rome, 2001) and uses footnotes sparingly. Because of their origin there is some overlap between the two parts, though the reviewer did not find this to be problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Translations – Quick Reference Sheet Translation Manuscripts Variation in Original Manuscripts Translation Variants
    DRV GENEVA KJV YLT NKJV LITV CW WEB Abbreviation ABP AB EMTV MKJV DARBY ASV NRSV NASB CEV GW ESV MSG HCSB NET NLT LEB Young’s Literal Translation Douay-Rheims Bible NIV New King James Version ISV Green’s Literal Translation King James Version VOICE AHB Geneva Bible Notes on Reading this Chart: English Majority Text Version Apostolic Bible Polyglot Modern King James Version World English Bible The Clear Word New Revised Standard Version The Apostles’ Bible Name American StandardJohn Version Darby’s Translation New American Standard Bible Contemporary English Version Holman Christian Standard Bible English StandardGod’s Version Word Translation New English Translation International Standard Version New Living Translation New International Version I’ve created this chart for my own personal reference, and as a teaching tool. All variantions are described in reference to the King James Version. This is not to imply that the reading of the KJV is superior to the others, but only to make comparison easier. Please understand that there are many, many variations amongLexham the English translations. Bible For this chart, I’ve chosen only a few verses Thefor Message Comparison, to show the preferences of the translators and the variation between the different manuscripts of the Old and New Testaments. The translations I chose to compare are by no means an exhaustive list. I chose a sampling of old English translations that are freely available, as well as some of the most popular recent translations that people are reading today. For brevity, have omitted many mid-20th century which have been replaced by newer versions, such as the RSV and many older variants of the NIV.
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Sea Scrolls & Aramaic Targums
    History and Authenticity of the Bible Lesson 5 Dead Sea Scrolls & Aramaic Targums By Dr. David Hocking Brought to you by The Blue Letter Bible Institute http://www.blbi.org A ministry of The Blue Letter Bible http://www.blueletterbible.org Lesson 05 HOCKING - HISTORY & AUTHENTICITY OF THE BIBLE Page 1 of 22 Dead Sea Scrolls & Aramaic Targums “Thy word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path.” Lord, I thank You for each of these students and I pray that you would put within them constantly a hunger for Your word, a desire to know You, to delight in the word day and night. And God we pray Your blessing, as we once again examine the wonderful factors relating to the reliability and inspiration of Your word. May our hearts grow deeper in appreciation for this wonderful, complete and final revelation from God in this form. We thank You. Your word is forever settled in the heavens and You have exalted it above Your own name, so we come to honor it. But most of all, Lord, we come to worship You. We thank You for all You have done for us. Minister to every student’s need; for those that are sick or ill, that You would strengthen them Father. Touch their bodies. Some of us are emotionally stressed and we need peace from You, and priority and wisdom. We thank You that You give that. We submit this time unto Your hands. In the wonderful name of Jesus we pray. Amen. We are talking about revelation, how God speaks to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Versions and Translations the Following Outlines Some of the Key
    Versions and Translations The following outlines some of the key characteristics of several Bibles currently in use. A number of the Bible translations most popular in the Western world today can be found in searchable form online (see: http://www.ntgateway.com/bible-translations/). The King James Version (KJV) The translation was planned from 1604 and published in 1611 under the auspices of King James VI of England. This Bible has become one of the most influential English books in modern Western civilization. It served as a unifier of English politics and religious disagreements. The King James Bible uses an economy of words and voices beautiful cadences that have led many to call it elegant. It remains a favorite in many Protestant circles. The Douay-Rheims Bible The first English translation for Roman Catholics was produced in Douay and Rheims in France from 1582-1610. It is based not upon the Hebrew and Greek text but rather the Vulgate, the Latin translation that was the authoritative Bible for the Catholic Church for much of its history. Its close adherence to the Latin makes many passages difficult for contemporary readers to understand, and it has largely fallen into disuse in many Catholic quarters. It is sometimes called the Rheims-Douay Bible. The American Standard Version (ASV) The growing sense that the KJV was based on less-than-ideal manuscripts and philological knowledge led to the British Revised Version in 1885. An American edition, the ASV, came out in 1901 and represented several hundred further emendations to suit its American audience. The ASV is sometimes thought of as by students of biblical languages as a particularly “wooden” translation, and it does in some respects seek to replicate the feel of the original, for example in using “Jehovah” rather than “Lord,” or “Sheol” rather than “grave/Hell.” However, the ASV is also quite euphemistic in places.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestication and Foreignisation in Dubbing and Subtitling of Duncan Jones‟ English Movie Warcraft Into Persian [PP: 162-170] Dr
    Domestication and Foreignisation in Dubbing and Subtitling of Duncan Jones‟ English Movie Warcraft into Persian [PP: 162-170] Dr. Razieh Eslamieh Nillofar Javankhah Islamic Azad University, Parand Branch Iran ABSTRACT The present paper studies diverse procedures related to Venuti‟s strategies of domestication and foreignisation in Farsi dubbing and subtitling of the English movie, Warcraft directed by Duncan Jones. The procedures of both domestication and foreignisation were studied and statically analysed for the purpose of exploring the film translation method (dubbing or subtitling) which is closer to target- language-culture and the one which is closer to source-language-culture. In other words it was intended to explore which translation strategy (domestication or foreignisation) dominates dubbing and which one dominates subtitling. The tertiary purpose was to compare the reasons of differences in dubbing versus subtitling on the one hand, and the reasons of differences of the target text from the source text. The statistical analysis revealed that in dubbing, cultural equivalence is the most frequently used procedure (38.26%) apparently for making the movie visible for the public Iranian audience and adjust the movie to cultural considerations. Henceforth, dubbing orients to domestication. However, subtitling, with literal translation as the most frequently used procedure (57.4%), orients to foreignisation. In dubbing of the movie, most differences are related to cultural equivalence (38.26%) and the literal translation (29.56%) is in the next step. An interesting point is that the procedure of calque is neither used in subtitling nor in dubbing. In subtitling, cultural equivalence stands in the second place (17.34) and explanation (9.50%) occupies the third place.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Subtitle Translation of Mirror Mirror from Relevance Theory
    American Research Journal of English and Literature Original Article ISSN 2378-9026 Volume 1, Issue 3, June-2015 On The Subtitle Translation of Mirror Mirror from Relevance Theory Han Cui-ping1, Ni Xue-li Yangtze University, College of Arts and Science (Jingzhou. Hubei,434020) Abstract: The popularity of foreign audio-visual products facilitates exchanges and communication among various cultures, and recent years have seen an increasing number of films distributed in foreign markets, which naturally leads to the prosperity of subtitle translation. This thesis selects the film Mirror Mirror as a case to analyze film subtitle translation strategies in the perspective of relevance theory. It consists of five parts: Part One offers a brief introduction to the research background and issues together with thesis structure. Partr Two offers some theories of Relevance Theory and relationship between relevance theory and subtitle translation. Part Three focuses a study on the subtitle translation strategies of Mirror Mirror from the perspective of relevance theory in which a detailed analysis of the difficult problems and response strategies will be made. Part Four is the conclusion. The thesis is an attempt to prove that Relevance Theory can be well applied in subtitle translation to guide the translation activity and improve the quality of subtitle translation. Keywords: Subtitle translation; Relevance Theory; Mirror Mirror; translation strategies. I. INTRODUCTION Throughout the translation history, equivalence has been regarded as the vital standard for a very long time. Nevertheless, with translation fields have become more and more colorful and diversity, such as film subtitle translation, business translation and advertising translation, the limitations of these translations rules have gradually turned up.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importation of the Holy Quran Into English: Governing Factors in the Translating Process
    AWEJ. Special Issue on Translation No.3 May, 2014 Pp. 95 - 104 The Importation of the Holy Quran into English: Governing Factors in the Translating Process Abobaker Ali M. Alsaleh Brakhw Universiti Utara Malaysia Sharifah Fazliyaton Shaik Ismail Universiti Utara Malaysia Abstract The current paper reviews briefly the literature on the translation of Holy Quran and articulates several factors that influenced the process of translating it. These factors are linguistic, stylistic, and personal. The first two refer to the inimitable style of the Holy Quran and the figurative speech employed in its structure, while personal factors are related to the knowledge and ideology of the translator. This paper seeks to establish a theoretical understanding of the factors that governed and shaped the translations of the Holy Quran to open arenas for future investigation of its translations, specifically the English translations, and provide suggestions to overcome the limitations of the translations. Keywords: Factors, language, meaning, Quran, translation Arab World English Journal www.awej.org 95 ISSN: 2229-9327 AWEJ. Special Issue on Translation No.3 May, 2014 The Importation of the Holy Quran into English Brakhw & Ismail Introduction One of the most noticeable developments of Quranic exegesis in the Muslim world is the upsurge of the translations of the Holy Quran in the twentieth century. In fact, the Index Translationum (http://unesco.org/culture/xtrans/) statistics indicate that the Holy Quran has been translated into more than twenty languages, including major European languages, such as English, French, Germany, Italian, Spanish, Norwegian and Asian languages, for instance, Urdu, Malayalam, Japanese, Korean, Indonesian, and Malay.
    [Show full text]