DOCSLIB.ORG

Science for Saving Species Research Update Project 2.3.2 Options Beyond Captivity for Two Critically Endangered Christmas Island Reptiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Science for Saving Species Research Update Project 2.3.2 Options Beyond Captivity for Two Critically Endangered Christmas Island Reptiles Science for Saving Species Research Update Project 2.3.2 Options beyond captivity for two critically endangered Christmas Island reptiles Conservation options for Christmas Island’s blue-tailed skinks Project Overview Introduced predators The blue-tailed skink Several introduced predators (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) threaten these lizard species, and and Lister’s gecko (Lepidodactylus were likely to have significantly listeri) are two endemic reptiles contributed to their extinction in to Christmas Island that are the wild. The wolf snake (Lycodon now presumed to be extinct in capucinus) and giant centipede the Wild. Both were once (Scolopendra subspinipes) are two common on the Island, however such species, and pose ongoing both declined rapidly from the threats to reintroduced wild 1980s, and by 2012 both had populations of skinks and geckos. vanished from the wild. The wolf snake was introduced Fortunately, in 2009 and early to Christmas Island in the 1980s 2010, Parks Australia, with the and is now found across the entire help of Perth Zoo, captured 66 island. On Christmas Island, the wolf blue-tailed skinks and 43 Lister’s snake is known to threaten native geckos to establish captive reptiles via predation. It has also breeding populations on been implicated in the extinction Christmas Island and at Taronga of the Christmas Island pipistrelle Zoo. Captive breeding has (Pipistrellus murrayi). circumvented extinction in Giant centipedes have been the short term, with both present since European settlement captive populations now over of the island in the late 1880s. 1000individuals. However, They predate on a range of native the facilities on Christmas Island species, including native reptiles Image: Renata De Jonge, Parks Australia have reached carrying capacity, like the blue-tailed skink and Blue-tailed skinks within a breeding and there is strong interest in Lister’s gecko. enclosure on Christmas Island. re-establishing wild populations of these two species. Research aim The purpose of this project is to explore options outside of captivity for these two lizard species, in the form of reintroductions back onto Christmas Island and/or assisted colonisation to other islands. Using a range of desktop, experimental, and management techniques, we are investigating what mechanisms will increase the chances of permanently establishing the blue-tailed skink and Lister’s gecko in the wild. Progress to date Population Viability harvesting scenarios. We will continue was making point observations Analysis to collect data over the next two from a number of locations on the years to reduce the uncertainty in outside of the exclosure. Lizards were The blue-tailed skink and Lister’s these models and develop additional monitored daily for approximately gecko are now confined entirely to models for trial reintroduction 4 weeks post release and then once captivity, so ensuring these captive populations on Christmas Island a week by Parks Australia staff. populations are viable now and or elsewhere. into the future whilst translocation Population decline and attempts are undertaken is critically First trial release failure to establish important. In April 2017, 139 blue-tailed skinks, One month after release (early May), Population viability analysis is a that were approximately one year old, we attempted to catch as many popular tool in conservation. It is a were released into an approximately lizards as possible to estimate the quantitative method for assessing a 0.25 hectare site (equivalent of population size and asses animal population and/or a species’ status 50m by 50m) at which introduced health. We were able to capture 37 and its likelihood of extinction. It predators were excluded by fencing. lizards of which 13 were already toe can also be used to develop and Before release, 57 blue-tailed skinks clipped. Unfortunately by the end of evaluate conservation management were weighed, measured and given June/early July population counts options, such as harvesting captive an individual toe-clip combination during monitoring had significantly breeding populations for translocation for identification, and to assist declined. Another mark-recapture programs. with capture-mark-recapture and session was undertaken four months Using eight years of captive breeding estimating population size over time. after release (early August). Only 7 data collected by Christmas This meant 42% of lizards were toe individuals were caught, all of which Island National Park staff, we have clipped at the time of release. had a unique toe clip combination. undertaken some preliminary analysis By the end of September no Lizards were monitored using two on the viability of the captive breeding individuals were seen (or detected methods. The first was using transects populations and have found they are with ink pads), and it was likely that set up within the site and the second resilient to a number of proposed none or very few were left in the site. Image: Parks Australia Traditional captive breeding enclosures on Christmas Island have been highly successful in increasing the number of skinks in captivity but are a resource intensive strategy over the long-term. Researcher Jon-Paul Emery preparing habitat in a new soft-release exclosure. In the distant background a solid fence over 1 metre high excludes feral predators, while a lower barrier (middle of picture) is used to create individual enclosures for skink trial reintroductions. Photo: Will Copeland The reasons and mechanisms Learnings from first trial The exclosure design and existing for the population decline and eradication methods have not been failure to establish remain unclear, The first trial established several effective against giant centipedes. however a few hypotheses include: pieces of evidence which will be Despite control attempts prior to and (1) unsuitable habitat, (2) predation, important in planning the second following skink reintroduction, giant and (3) stress from the release trial. In particular: centipedes remained within the soft of captive animals into the wild. Lizards have retained anti-predator release area in high densities. Additionally, we were unable to behaviour. This was indicated as A new giant centipede eradication locate deceased animals so numerous individuals were observed method is proving effective. investigation of causes of death actively avoid the Christmas Island Over the course of the first trial could not be undertaken. All three thrush (an endemic forest bird and nearly 400 giant centipedes were hypotheses will be investigated known predator). discovered and removed over through either experiments (see Food availability and foraging 6 months. Christmas Island National below) and/or explored more capability are adequate. The body Park staff have now implemented deeply in the next trial reintroduction. weights of all individuals that were a chemical eradication method captured during both mark-recapture which is working extremely well. Parks Australia staff behind one of the sessions were approximately the newer more natural captive breeding same or heavier than at release enclosures. Photo Renata De Jong indicating that food and foraging were not limiting factors. The exclosure design effectively excludes wolf snakes. No wolf snakes or signs of wolf snakes were ever found during surveys indicating that the fencing is effectively excluding them from the area. Right: Inside a soft-release exclosure. Image: Jon-Paul Emery Image: Parks Australia Future areas of research Analysis of reptile Interactions between To address these questions, we extinctions on blue-tailed skinks, are planning to undertake a series of experiments to identify the Christmas Island red crabs, and giant relationships between blue-tailed We are currently undertaking a centipedes skinks, red crabs and giant centipedes. systematic assessment of the possible Several areas of further investigation The aim is to identify if red crabs causal factors that may have had were prompted by the outcome of could play a role in increasing the a role in Christmas Island reptile the initial reintroduction trial. One of likelihood of successful reintroduction extinctions. This will also be placed the most important questions is: for both lizard species. within the context of modern (post- what role, if any, did giant centipedes 1500) global island reptile extinctions, play in the failure of this trial? Second trial noting that island species comprise reintroduction onto Giant centipedes are voracious 25 of the 28 global extinctions of Christmas Island reptile species since 1700. predators and are known to prey on a wide variety of animals. However, In July 2018, Parks Australia are they are known to have been present planning to undertake a second on the island for over 100 years, so trial reintroduction onto Christmas native reptiles have persisted with Island into the introduced predator them over a long period. However, free exclosure. The team will the dynamics of many prey and adapt management in light of all predator populations on this island information learned from the first have been severely affected by trial, including increasing predator the marked decline of red crab management and increasing habitat numbers in many areas, due to the complexity and suitability of the establishment of supercolonies of site. Coupled with an adapted yellow crazy ants since the 1980s. monitoring regime, the team believes these management changes will So, a second research question is: significantly increase
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unsustainable Food Systems Threaten Wild Crop and Dolphin Species
    INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until: 07:00 GMT (16:00 JST) 5 December 2017 Elaine Paterson, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Goska Bonnaveira, IUCN Media Relations, m +41 792760185, email [email protected] [In Japan] Cheryl-Samantha MacSharry, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Download photographs here Download summary statistics here Unsustainable food systems threaten wild crop and dolphin species Tokyo, Japan, 5 December 2017 (IUCN) – Species of wild rice, wheat and yam are threatened by overly intensive agricultural production and urban expansion, whilst poor fishing practices have caused steep declines in the Irrawaddy Dolphin and Finless Porpoise, according to the latest update of The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. Today’s Red List update also reveals that a drying climate is pushing the Ringtail Possum to the brink of extinction. Three reptile species found only on an Australian island – the Christmas Island Whiptail-skink, the Blue- tailed Skink (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) and the Lister’s Gecko – have gone extinct, according to the update. But in New Zealand, conservation efforts have improved the situation for two species of Kiwi. “Healthy, species-rich ecosystems are fundamental to our ability to feed the world’s growing population and achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goal 2 – to end hunger by 2030,” says IUCN Director General Inger Andersen. “Wild crop species, for example, maintain genetic diversity of agricultural crops
    [Show full text]
  • The Herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a First Report 19 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.109.1439 Research Article Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 109: 19–86 (2011) The herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a first report 19 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.109.1439 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a first report Hinrich Kaiser1, Venancio Lopes Carvalho2, Jester Ceballos1, Paul Freed3, Scott Heacox1, Barbara Lester3, Stephen J. Richards4, Colin R. Trainor5, Caitlin Sanchez1, Mark O’Shea6 1 Department of Biology, Victor Valley College, 18422 Bear Valley Road, Victorville, California 92395, USA; and The Foundation for Post-Conflict Development, 245 Park Avenue, 24th Floor, New York, New York 10167, USA 2 Universidade National Timor-Lorosa’e, Faculdade de Ciencias da Educaçao, Departamentu da Biologia, Avenida Cidade de Lisboa, Liceu Dr. Francisco Machado, Dili, Timor-Leste 3 14149 S. Butte Creek Road, Scotts Mills, Oregon 97375, USA 4 Conservation International, PO Box 1024, Atherton, Queensland 4883, Australia; and Herpetology Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia 5 School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia 6 West Midland Safari Park, Bewdley, Worcestershire DY12 1LF, United Kingdom; and Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Vic- toria 3010, Australia Corresponding author: Hinrich Kaiser ([email protected]) Academic editor: Franco Andreone | Received 4 November 2010 | Accepted 8 April 2011 | Published 20 June 2011 Citation: Kaiser H, Carvalho VL, Ceballos J, Freed P, Heacox S, Lester B, Richards SJ, Trainor CR, Sanchez C, O’Shea M (2011) The herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a first report. ZooKeys 109: 19–86.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of the Christmas Island Blind Snake, Ramphotyphlops Exocoeti (Reptilia: Squamata: Typhlopidae)
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 27 156–160 (2012) A new record of the Christmas Island Blind Snake, Ramphotyphlops exocoeti (Reptilia: Squamata: Typhlopidae). Dion J. Maple1, Rachel Barr, Michael J. Smith 1 Christmas Island National Park, Christmas Island, Western Australia, Indian Ocean, 6798, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The endemic Christmas Island Blind Snake Ramphotyphlops exocoeti is a species rarely collected since initial faunal collections were conducted on Christmas Island in 1887. Twenty-three years after the last record in 1986, an individual was collected on 31 July 2009. Here we catalogue historical collection records of this animal. We also describe the habitat and conditions in which the recent collection occurred and provide a brief morphological description of the animal including a diagnostic feature that may assist in future identifi cations. This account provides the fi rst accurate spatial record and detailed description of habitat utilised by this species. KEYWORDS: Indian Ocean, Yellow Crazy Ant, recovery plan INTRODUCTION ‘fairly common’ and could be found under the trunks Christmas Island is located in the Indian Ocean of fallen trees. In 1975 a specimen collected from (10°25'S, 105°40'E), approximately 360 km south of the Stewart Hill, located in the central west of the island western head of Java, Indonesia (Geoscience Australia in a mine lease known as Field 22, was deposited in 2011). This geographically remote, rugged and thickly the Australian Museum (Cogger and Sadlier 1981). A vegetated island is the exposed summit of a large specimen was caught by N. Dunlop in 1984 while pit mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland
    Summary of an Observational Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland Graham Armstrong – May, 2016 Objective - to provide an updated and more complete list of the herpetofauna recorded from Bimblebox Nature Refuge. Approach - 1. Review available data and records pertaining to the herpetofauna at Bimblebox Nature Refuge. 2. Visit Bimblebox Nature Refuge during Spring, Summer and Autumn seasons to make observational and photographic records of the herpetofauna observed. Methodology - In order to maximise the number of species recorded, 3 successive 2.5 day visits were made to BNR, one in September 2015, Jan 2016 and the end of April 2016. This approach potentially broadens the range of weather conditions experienced and hence variety of reptiles and amphibians encountered when compared to a single field visit. Survey methodology involved walking and driving around the nature refuge during the day and after dark (with the aid of a head torch to detect eye-shine). Active reptiles including those that ran for or from cover while passing by were recorded. Frequently, in situ photographic evidence of individuals was obtained and the photographs are available for the purpose of corroborating identification. To avoid any double counting of individual animals the Refuge was traversed progressively and the locations of animals were recorded using a GPS. During any one visit no area was traversed twice and when driving along tracks, reptiles were only recorded the first time a track was traversed unless a new species was detected at a later time. Available Records The most detailed list of reptiles and amphibians recorded as occurring on Bimblebox Nature Reserve comes from the standardised trapping program of Eric Vanderduys of CSIRO in Townsville.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles and Frogs of Gluepot Reserve (Updated June 2020)
    Reptiles and Frogs of Gluepot Reserve (updated June 2020) Scientific name Common name Notes with reference to Gluepot Family Agamidae Dragon Lizards Ctenophorus spinodomus1 Eastern Mallee Dragon Terrestrial, associated with spinifex, commonly observed Ctenophorus pictus Painted Dragon Terrestrial, commonly observed Diporiphora nobbi Nobbi Dragon Terrestrial/arboreal, commonly observed Pogona vitticeps Central Bearded Dragon Terrestrial, commonly observed Family Gekkonidae Typical Geckos Gehyra versicolor2 Eastern Tree Dtella Arboreal, nocturnal, commonly observed on buildings Heteronotia binoei Bynoe’s Gecko Terrestrial, nocturnal, occasionally observed Family Carphodactylidae Knob-tails & others Nephrurus levis Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko Terrestrial, nocturnal, occasionally observed Family Diplodactylidae Diplodactylus furcosis Ranges Stone Gecko Terrestrial, nocturnal, occasionally observed Diplodactylus vittatus Eastern Stone Gecko Terrestrial, nocturnal, occasionally observed Lucasium damaeum Beaded Gecko Terrestrial, nocturnal, commonly observed Oedura cincta3 Inland Marbled Velvet Gecko Arboreal, nocturnal, on Black Oak, rarely observed Rhynchoedura angusta4 Border Beaked Gecko Terrestrial, nocturnal, occasionally observed. Strophurus elderi Jewelled Gecko Terrestrial, nocturnal, in spinifex, occasionally observed Strophurus williamsi Eastern Spiny-tailed Gecko Terrestrial/arboreal, nocturnal, occasionally observed Family Pygopodidae Legless Lizards Aprasia inaurita Red-tailed Worm Lizard Terrestrial, rarely observed, often under
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Practice Captive Reptile and Amphibian Husbandry Nature Conservation Act 1992
    Code of Practice Captive Reptile and Amphibian Husbandry Nature Conservation Act 1992 ♥ The State of Queensland, Department of Environment and Science, 2020 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without prior written permission of the Department of Environment and Science. Requests for permission should be addressed to Department of Environment and Science, GPO Box 2454 Brisbane QLD 4001. Author: Department of Environment and Science Email: [email protected] Approved in accordance with section 174A of the Nature Conservation Act 1992. Acknowledgments: The Department of Environment and Science (DES) has prepared this code in consultation with the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and recreational reptile and amphibian user groups in Queensland. Human Rights compatibility The Department of Environment and Science is committed to respecting, protecting and promoting human rights. Under the Human Rights Act 2019, the department has an obligation to act and make decisions in a way that is compatible with human rights and, when making a decision, to give proper consideration to human rights. When acting or making a decision under this code of practice, officers must comply with that obligation (refer to Comply with Human Rights Act). References referred to in this code- Bustard, H.R. (1970) Australian lizards. Collins, Sydney. Cann, J. (1978) Turtles of Australia. Angus and Robertson, Australia. Cogger, H.G. (2018) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. Revised 7th Edition, CSIRO Publishing. Plough, F. (1991) Recommendations for the care of amphibians and reptiles in academic institutions. National Academy Press: Vol.33, No.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecomorphology, Microhabitat Use, Performance and Reproductive Output in Tropical Lygosomine Lizards
    This file is part of the following reference: Goodman, Brett (2006) Ecomorphology, microhabitat use, performance and reproductive output in tropical lygosomine lizards. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/4784 Ecomorphology, Microhabitat Use, Performance and Reproductive Output in Tropical Lygosomine Lizards Brett Alexander Goodman BSc University of Melbourne BSc (Hons) Latrobe University Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Tropical Ecology James Cook University of North Queensland September 2006 Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given ------------------------- ------------------ (Signature) (Date) Statement of Access I, the undersigned, author of this thesis, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the University library and, via the Australian Digital Theses network, for use elsewhere. I understand that, as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and I do not wish to place any further restriction on access to this work. ------------------------- ------------------ (Signature) (Date) Preface The following is a list of publications arising from work related to, or conducted as part of this thesis to date: HOEFER , A.M., B. A. GOODMAN , AND S.J. DOWNES (2003) Two effective and inexpensive methods for restraining small lizards. Herpetological Review 34 :223-224. GOODMAN , B.A., G.N.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 for Consideration in Biological Conservation 1 2 Geographic and Taxonomic Patterns of Extinction Risk in Australian Squamates
    1 1 For consideration in Biological Conservation 2 3 Geographic and taxonomic patterns of extinction risk in Australian squamates 4 5 Reid Tingley1, Stewart L. Macdonald2, Nicola J. Mitchell3, John C.Z. Woinarski4, Shai Meiri5,6, Phil 6 Bowles7, Neil A. Cox7, Glenn M. Shea8, Monika Böhm9, Janice Chanson7, Marcelo F. Tognelli7, 7 Jaclyn Harris1, Claire Walke1, Natasha Harrison3, Savannah Victor3, Calum Woods3, Andrew P. 8 Amey10, Mike Bamford11, Gareth Catt12, Nick Clemann13, Patrick J. Couper10, Hal Cogger14, Mark 9 Cowan15, Michael Craig3,16, Chris R. Dickman17, Paul Doughty18, Ryan Ellis18,19, Aaron Fenner20, 10 Stewart Ford21, Glen Gaikhorst22, Graeme R. Gillespie23, Matthew J. Greenlees17,24, Rod Hobson25, 11 Conrad J. Hoskin26, Ric How18, Mark N. Hutchinson27, Ray Lloyd28, Peter McDonald29, Jane 12 Melville30, Damian R. Michael31, Craig Moritz32, Paul M. Oliver33,34, Garry Peterson35, Peter 13 Robertson36, Chris Sanderson37, Ruchira Somaweera38, Roy Teale21, Leonie Valentine3, Eric 14 Vanderduys39, Melanie Venz40, Erik Wapstra41, Steve Wilson10, David G. Chapple1* 15 16 1. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Australia 17 2. CSIRO Land and Water Flagship, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 18 3. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western 19 Australia, Australia 20 4. Threatened Species Recovery Hub, National Environmental Science Program, Charles 21 Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia 22 5. School of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 23 6. Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 24 7. Biodiversity Assessment Unit, International Union for Conservation of Nature and 25 Conservation International, Washington DC, USA. 26 8. Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 27 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles on the Brink: Identifying the Australian Terrestrial Snake and Lizard Species Most at Risk of Extinction
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Pacific Conservation Biology, 2021, 27, 3–12 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC20033 Reptiles on the brink: identifying the Australian terrestrial snake and lizard species most at risk of extinction Hayley M. Geyle A, Reid Tingley B, Andrew P. AmeyC, Hal CoggerD, Patrick J. CouperC, Mark CowanE, Michael D. CraigF,G, Paul DoughtyH, Don A. DriscollI, Ryan J. EllisH,J, Jon-Paul EmeryF, Aaron FennerK, Michael G. GardnerK,L, Stephen T. Garnett A, Graeme R. GillespieM, Matthew J. GreenleesN, Conrad J. HoskinO, J. Scott KeoghP, Ray LloydQ, Jane Melville R, Peter J. McDonaldS, Damian R. MichaelT, Nicola J. Mitchell F, Chris SandersonU,V, Glenn M. Shea W,X, Joanna Sumner R, Erik WapstraY, John C. Z. Woinarski A and David G. Chapple B,Z AThreatened Species Recovery Hub, National Environmental Science Program, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, NT 0909, Australia. BSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia. CBiodiversity Program, Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia. DAustralian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. EDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia. FSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. GSchool of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. HDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia. ICentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia. JBiologic Environmental Survey, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia. KCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia. LEvolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Density of Three Skink Species on a Sub-Tropical Pacific Island Estimated with Hierarchical Distance Sampling
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 13(3):507–516. Submitted: 20 May 2017; Accepted: 23 August 2018; Published: 16 December 2018. DENSITY OF THREE SKINK SPECIES ON A SUB-TROPICAL PACIFIC ISLAND ESTIMATED WITH HIERARCHICAL DISTANCE SAMPLING SARAH HAVERY1,3, STEFFEN OPPEL1, NIK COLE2, AND NEIL DUFFIELD1 1Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK 2Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Les Augrès Manor, Trinity, Jersey JE3 5BP, Channel Islands, UK 3Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—Henderson Island is an uninhabited island in the South Pacific Ocean with many native vertebrate and invertebrate species, but reptile populations are very poorly known. Reptile populations are typically quantified using simple count statistics, which may not allow robust population comparisons in time or space if detection probability changes. Here, we provide density estimates for three skink species on Henderson Island using repeated point counts and hierarchical distance sampling to estimate skink density while accounting for habitat associations and variation in detectability. Emoia cyanura had the highest density (Mean ± SE, 1,286 ± 225.3 individuals/ha; 95% confidence interval = 912.1–1,812.6), followed by Cryptoblepharus poecilopleurus (762.7 ± 108.3 individuals/ ha; 95% CI = 577.5–1,007.5) and Lipinia noctua (375.7 ± 125.4 individuals/ha; 95% CI = 195.4–722.6). The density of C. poecilopleurus varied by substrate and was higher on rock and gravel, and L. noctua density was higher in areas with larger trees or with less litter cover. We also recorded two gecko species that had not previously been recorded on Henderson Island.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 §4-71-6.5 List of Restricted Animals [ ] Part A: For
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF RESTRICTED ANIMALS [ ] PART A: FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Hirudinea ORDER Gnathobdellida FAMILY Hirudinidae Hirudo medicinalis leech, medicinal ORDER Rhynchobdellae FAMILY Glossiphoniidae Helobdella triserialis leech, small snail CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Euchytraeidae Enchytraeidae (all species in worm, white family) FAMILY Eudrilidae Helodrilus foetidus earthworm FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus terrestris earthworm Allophora (all species in genus) earthworm CLASS Polychaeta ORDER Phyllodocida FAMILY Nereidae Nereis japonica lugworm PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Arachnida ORDER Acari FAMILY Phytoseiidae 1 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Iphiseius degenerans predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus longipes predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus macropilis predator, spider mite Neoseiulus californicus predator, spider mite Neoseiulus longispinosus predator, spider mite Typhlodromus occidentalis mite, western predatory FAMILY Tetranychidae Tetranychus lintearius biocontrol agent, gorse CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Hyalidae Parhyale hawaiensis amphipod, marine ORDER Anomura FAMILY Porcellanidae Petrolisthes cabrolloi crab, porcelain Petrolisthes cinctipes crab, porcelain Petrolisthes elongatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes eriomerus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes gracilis crab, porcelain Petrolisthes granulosus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes japonicus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes laevigatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes
    [Show full text]