DOCSLIB.ORG

Adjustment Lending

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adjustment Lending Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No. 40716-UA INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Public Disclosure Authorized AND THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY FOR UKRAINE FOR THE PERIOD FYO8-FY11 Public Disclosure Authorized November 8,2007 Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova Country Management Unit Europe and Central Asia Region International Finance Corporation Central and Eastern Europe Department Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. The date of the last Country Assistance Strategy was October 23,2004 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit = Hryvnia (UAH) July 2007: US$=UAH5.05 FISCAL YEAR Government of Ukraine: January 1- December 3 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAA Analytical and Advisory Activities BEEPS Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey CAS Country Assistance Strategy CAS CR Country Assistance Strategy Completion Report CEM Country Economic Memorandum CIDA Canadian International Development Association CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CPAR Country Procurement Assessment Report CPPR Country Portfolio Performance Review CPS Country Partnership Strategy CTP Center for Tender Procedures and Business Planning DPL Development Policy Loan EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC European Commission ECA Europe and Central Asia EIB European Investment Bank EMBI Emerging Market Borrowing Index ESW Economic and Sector Work FDI Foreign Direct Investment FSAP Financial Sector Assessment Program FTA Free Trade Agreement GATT’s General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GDP Gross Domestic Product GoU Government of Ukraine IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IEG Independent Evaluation Group IFC International Finance Corporation IMF International Monetary Fund ISR Implementation Status and Results MICs Middle Income Countries MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency MoF Ministry of Finance NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NBU National Bank of Ukraine NGO Non-governmental Organization FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PAL Program Adjustment Loan PAYG Pay As You Go PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability PFM Public Finance Management Reform project PIUS Project Implementation Units PPPS Public Private Partnerships PTAP Programmatic Technical Assistance Partnership PTP Power Transmission project SAMP Social Assistance Modernization project SIAM Social Insurance Administration Modernization project SIDA Swedish International Development Association SME Small and Medium Enterprise SOEs State owned Enterprises STATCAP Statistics Capacity Building SWAPS Sector-Wide Approaches TB Tuberculosis TFP Total Factor Productivity TIMMS Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study TRIMS Trade-Related Investment Measures TRIPS Trade-Related Aspects ofIntellectual Property Rights UEFA European Soccer Association USAID United States Agency for International Development VAT Value-Added Tax WBG World Bank Group WBI World Bank Institute WTO World Trade Organization IBRD IFC Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Declan Duff Country Director: Paul Bermingham Jerome Sooklal Team Leader: Martin Raiser Oksana Nagayets This CAS was prepared by a core team that included Anush Bezhanyan, Olena Belch, Julia Smolyar, Katia Petrina, Zoran Anusic, Igor Oliynik, Hermann von Gersdorff, Paul0 Correa, Alexander Pankov, Natasha Kapil, Hormoz Aghdaey, Vitaliy Bigdai, Dejan Ostojic, Dmytro Glazkov, Alexander Kaliberda, Alexei Slenzak, Matthias Grueninger, Svetlana Budagovska, Maria Koreniako, Tetyana Komashko, Jana Kunicova, Viktoria Siryachenko, Oleksiy Balabushko, Rush Piontkivsky, Pablo Saavedra, Munaver Sultan Khwaja, Luis Alvaro Sanchez, Anna Wielogorska, Dmytro Derkatch, Suzy Yoon, Yulia Snizhko, Iouri Loutsenko, Cathy Summers, Sergiy Kulyk, Ivan Velev, Florentin Blanc (IFC), Sanjar Ibragimov (IFC) and Aliona Voloshina (IFC’r. This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not be otherwise disclosed without World Bank authorization. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVES~Y .......................................................................................................... i I. COUNTRY CONTEXT................................................................................................ 1 A . Economic Context ................................................................................................... 1 B. Recent Social Developments .................................................................................. 3 C . Recent Political Developments ............................................................................... 7 I1. RECENTECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS AND RISKS ..................................................... 9 A . Recent Economic Growth - Drivers and Prospects for Sustainability ................... 9 B. Maintaining Macro-Economic Balance ................................................................ 11 C . Key Risks to the Outlook ...................................................................................... 14 I11. UKRAINE’SDEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES .............................................................. 16 A . Sustaining Growth and Improving Competitiveness ............................................ 16 B. Public Finance. Public Sector Reform and Improved Public Service Delivery ... 17 C . Governance and Public Support for Reform......................................................... 19 IV. GOVERNMENTRESPONSE ...................................................................................... 21 V . WORLD BANKGROUP STRATEGY .......................................................................... 24 A . Lessons Learned from the 2003-2007 CAS .......................................................... 24 B. Operational Principles and Rules of Engagement ................................................ 28 C . CPS Pillars and Objectives ................................................................................... 31 D. Operational Activities by Pillar ............................................................................ 33 E. Results, Monitoring and Evaluation ..................................................................... 41 F. Consultation Process............................................................................................. 44 VI. RISKS AND RISK MITIGATION................................................................................ 45 A . Implementation Risks ........................................................................................... 45 B. Credit Risks ........................................................................................................... 48 Tables: Table 1: Main Macroeconomic Indicators. 2000-2006 ...................................................... 2 Table 2: Key Social Indicators, 2005 .................................................................................. 7 Table 3: Medium-Term Economic Projections for 2007-2010 ........................................ 14 Table 4: Common Reform Areas in Government Programs, 2000-2007 ......................... 22 Table 5: The CPS Programs by Pillar and Typology ....................................................... 32 Table 6: The Transition from Extensive to Intensive Growth - Pillar 1 Themes ............. 35 Table 7: CPS Activities in FYO8 and FY09 ..................................................................... 43 Figures: Figure 1: GDP Growth Rate. 1991-2006 ........................................................................... 1 Figure 2: EBRD Average Transition Indicator. 199 1-2006 .............................................. 2 Figure 3: Poverty Rate in Ukraine. 2000 -2005 ............................................................... 3 Figure 4a-d: Ukraine Poverty Rates.................................................................................... 5 Figure 5: Natural Gas Prices by Type of User ................................................................... 6 Figure 6 a-b: The Structural Transformation of Ukraine’s Economy .............................. 11 Boxes: Box 1: Poverty in Ukraine: Concepts vs . Perception.......................................................... 4 Box 2: Recovery from the Transition Crisis and the Impact of Reform........................... 13 Box 3: Euro 2012 ............................................................................................................. 17 Box 4: The Recent Evolution of Public Procurement...................................................... 19 Box 5: Portfolio Performance and the Investment Lending Review ............................... 26 Box 6: Operational Approach to Governance in the CPS ............................................... 36 Box 7: Portfolio Monitoring and Implementation: Agreed Services Standards ............. 47 Annexes: Annex 1: Key Development Challenges .......................................................................... 50 Annex 2: Governance and Anti-Corruption Agenda ....................................................... 60 Annex 3: CAS Completion Report (FY04-07) ............................................................... 76 Annex 4: IEG Recommendations from the Country Assistance 2003-2007
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IFC in Ukraine: 1993 – 2006 an Independent Country Impact Review
    IFC in Ukraine: 1993 – 2006 An Independent Country Impact Review http://www.ifc.org/ieg 2008 Washington D.C 2008 © International Finance Corporation (IFC) 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20433, USA Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: http://www.ifc.org All rights reserved This volume, except for the “IFC Management Response to IEG-IFC” and “Chairperson’s Summary” is a product of the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) and the findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of IFC Management, the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group, or the govern- ments they represent. This volume does not support any general inferences beyond the scope of the evaluation, in- cluding any inferences about IFC’s past, current, or prospective overall performance. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no re- sponsibility whatsoever for any consequences of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other informa- tion shown on any map in a publication do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without per- mission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; facsimile: 978-750-4470; Internet:http://www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • BICC Paper9: an Overview of Defense Conversion in Ukraine
    by StacyLarsen June1997 StacyLarsen iscurrentlycompletingherMaster'sdegreeinInternationalPolicyStudiesattheMontereyInstituteofInternati onalStudies. SheconductedtheresearchforthispaperwhileinterningatBICC. Copyeditor:RobertMann BICC.ANDERELISABETHKIRCHE255311. 3BONNGERMAN. Y .PHONE+49-228-91196-0.FAX+49-228-241215 [email protected]:http://bicc.uni-bonn.de AN OVERVIEW OF DEFENSE CONVERSION IN UKRAINE CONTENTS I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 4 III. AREA ONE: REALLOCATION OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES 6 IV. AREA TWO: REORIENTATION OF MILITARY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)—COOPERATIVE INVESTMENT IN UKRAINE’S SOCIOECONOMIC FUTURE 9 1. Military R&D in Ukraine 9 2. R&D Conversion Programs in Ukraine 9 2.1 Science and Technology Center of Ukraine 9 2.2 Civilian Research and Development Foundation 11 2.3 International Association for the Promotion of Cooperation 12 with Scientists from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union 3. The Role of External Assistance 14 4. Questions for Further Research 15 4.1 The Extent of ‘Brain Drain’ 15 4.2 R&D Conversion in Conventional Weapons Technologies 15 i V. AREA THREE: UKRAINE’S MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX—CONVERSION OR ARMS MARKET DEVELOPMENT? 16 1. The Arms Industry in Ukraine 16 1.1 Conversion Plans and Projects in the Aerospace, Aviation 22 and Shipbuilding Sectors 1.2 Obstacles to Conversion 23 1.3 Pursuing the Arms Market 25 2. The Role of External Assistance 27 3. Questions for Further Research 28 3.1 Successof Independent Conversion Efforts 28 3.2 Role of Private Investment in Defense Industry Restructuring 28 3.3 Consequences of Arms Export Expansion 29 VI. AREA FOUR: DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION OF MILITARY PERSONNEL 30 1. Demobilization: Obstacles and Opportunities 30 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship-Breaking.Com Information Bulletins on Ship Demolition, # 8 - 11 from January 1, to December 31, 2007
    Ship-breaking.com Information bulletins on ship demolition, # 8 - 11 from January 1, to December 31, 2007 Robin des Bois 2008 Press release January, 24th 2008 Global Statement 2007 of Shipping Vessels Sent to Demolition For the 2nd consecutive year, Robin des Bois has been studying in detail the reality of the ship breaking market. The mobilisation and the analysis of about thirty diverse and specialised bibliographical sources made it possible to establish an inventory of the vessels sent to be demolished in 2007. In 2006, Robin des Bois tallied 293 vessels sold for demolition. In 2007, we listed 288 of them. If this decline in demolished vessels is modest (-2%), it is a little more significant with regard to the total weight of recycled metals: 1.7 million ton in 2007 against 1.9 million in 2006 (-10%). The situation differs however according to the category of ships considered: the number of tankers (oil tankers, chemical tankers, gas carriers) dismantled in 2007 increased by almost 30 % compared with 2006 whereas that of the bulk carriers and other general cargo ships decreased by almost 40 %; the average age of the tankers sent to demolition is 29 years, the average age for all the vessels is 31 years, the average age of bulk carriers 34 years. Of the 288 vessels, 95 (33 %) were under a European flag or belonged to ship-owners established in the European Union or members of the European Association of Free Exchange (EFTA) or members of the principalities like Monaco. Not one of the international exchanges linking these European ship-owners to non-European demolition sites were preceded by any asbestos removal.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Thesis
    Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER’S THESIS Study program/ Specialization: Spring semester, 2010 Offshore Technology: Subsea Constructions Open Writer: Nadiya Bukhanevych Bukhanevych (Writer’s signature) Faculty supervisor: Ove Tobias Gudmestad External supervisor(s): − Titel of thesis: Key Configurations for Design and Fabrication of High Speed Offshore Vessels. Credits (ECTS): 30 Key words: Pages: ………………… + enclosure: ………… Stavanger, UiS, 01/03/2010 Date/year Frontpage for master thesis Faculty of Science and Technology Decision made by the Dean October 30th 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Master Thesis would not have been written without my supervisor Prof. Ove Tobias Gudmestad, who was abundantly helpful and offered invaluable assistance, who encouraged and challenged me throughout the successful completion. He never accepted less than my best efforts. Thank YOU very MUCH!!!! I would also like to acknowledge to “Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding”, Mykolayev, Ukraine for given materials and books and especially thanks to Dr. Oleksandr Saulovych Rashkovsky. A very special thanks needs to be given to my sister, Anna Frantzen, and to my family members for their support in every way possible. My sincere thanks also goes to all my friends for “being my friends”. And finally to God, who makes all things possible. Stavanger, UiS 25.02.2010 Nadiya Bukhanevych Table of Contents Abstract Abstract in Russian 1. Fundamental concept of multihulls……………………………………………… 1 History Weight/Geometry stability Advantages/ Disadvantages of multihulls Stability Increasing static stability by adding a keel Increasing static stability by increasing beam Static stability of multihulls Comfort in multihulls Seaworthiness Multihulls in motion Six principal motions (six degrees of freedom) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship-Breaking.Com 2012 Bulletins of Information and Analysis on Ship Demolition, # 27 to 30 from January 1St to December 31St 2012
    Ship-breaking.com 2012 Bulletins of information and analysis on ship demolition, # 27 to 30 From January 1st to December 31st 2012 Robin des Bois 2013 Ship-breaking.com Bulletins of information and analysis on ship demolition 2012 Content # 27 from January 1st to April 15th …..……………………….………………….…. 3 (Demolition on the field (continued); The European Union surrenders; The Senegal project ; Letters to the Editor ; A Tsunami of Scrapping in Asia; The END – Pacific Princess, the Love Boat is not entertaining anymore) # 28 from April 16th to July 15th ……..…………………..……………….……..… 77 (Ocean Producer, a fast ship leaves for the scrap yard ; The Tellier leaves with honor; Matterhorn, from Brest to Bordeaux ; Letters to the Editor ; The scrapping of a Portuguese navy ship ; The India – Bangladesh pendulum The END – Ocean Shearer, end of the cruise for the sheep) # 29 from July 16th to October 14th ....……………………..……………….……… 133 (After theExxon Valdez, the Hebei Spirit ; The damaged ship conundrum; Farewell to container ships ; Lepse ; Letters to the Editor ; No summer break ; The END – the explosion of Prem Divya) # 30 from October 15th to December 31st ….………………..…………….……… 197 (Already broken up, but heading for demolition ; Demolition in America; Falsterborev, a light goes out ; Ships without place of refuge; Demolition on the field (continued) ; Hong Kong Convention; The final 2012 sprint; 2012, a record year; The END – Charlesville, from Belgian Congo to Lithuania) Global Statement 2012 ……………………… …………………..…………….……… 266 Bulletin of information and analysis May 7, 2012 on ship demolition # 27 from January 1 to April 15, 2012 Ship-breaking.com An 83 year old veteran leaves for ship-breaking. The Great Lakes bulker Maumee left for demolition at the Canadian ship-breaking yard at Port Colborne (see p 61).
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of THE WORLD BANK Report No. 22526-UA Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ONA PROPOSED GRANT FROM THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY TRUST FUND Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 5.4 MILLION (US$6.9 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO UKRAINE FOR THE AZOV BLACK SEA CORRIDOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized December 14, 2001 Environmentallyand SociallySustainable Development Sector Unit Ukraine and BelarusCountry Unit Europeand CentralAsia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 200 1) Currency Unit = Hryvnia (UAH) UAH 1.00 = US$0.18 US$1.00 = UAH 5.43 FISCAL YEAR January 1 -- December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BSAP Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan BSEP Black Sea Environmental Program CAS Country Assistance Strategy COP Conference of the Parties CSCEP Crimea State Committee for EnvironmnentalProtection EA Environmental Assessment EU European Union EMP Environmental Management Plan FSU Former Soviet Union GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System GOE Government-owned Enterprises IDF Institutional Development Fund LAC Local Advisory Committee MENR Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources NGO Nongovernmental Organization PSC Project Steering Committee PAL Programmatic Adjustment Loan PIP Project Implementation Plan PIU Project Implementation Unit PMR Project Management Report RLP Regional Landscape Park SA Special Account SAC Scientific Advisory Committee SOE Statement of Expenditure ULRMC Ukrainian Land and Resource Management Center USAID United States Agency for Intemational Development Vice President: Johannes F. Limn Country Manager/Director: Luca Barbone Sector Manager/Director: Kevin M. Cleaver Task Team Leader/Task Manager: Phillip Brylski UKRAINE AZOV BLACK SEA CORRIDOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION CONTENTS A. Project Development Objective Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Ukrainian Companies' Financial
    “Estimating the Ukrainian companies’ financial potential and the probability of forced liquidation” Volodymyr Nusinov https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9293-2969 AUTHORS Liudmyla Burkova https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-5785 Natalia Shura https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-0550 Volodymyr Nusinov, Liudmyla Burkova and Natalia Shura (2020). Estimating the ARTICLE INFO Ukrainian companies’ financial potential and the probability of forced liquidation. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(2), 26-39. doi:10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.03 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.03 RELEASED ON Monday, 04 May 2020 RECEIVED ON Friday, 07 February 2020 ACCEPTED ON Thursday, 23 April 2020 LICENSE This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License JOURNAL "Investment Management and Financial Innovations" ISSN PRINT 1810-4967 ISSN ONLINE 1812-9358 PUBLISHER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 30 0 8 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Volume 17, Issue 2, 2020 Volodymyr Nusinov (Ukraine), Liudmyla Burkova (Ukraine), Natalia Shura (Ukraine) Estimating the Ukrainian BUSINESS PERSPECTIVES LLC “СPС “Business Perspectives” companies’ financial Hryhorii Skovoroda lane, 10, Sumy, 40022, Ukraine potential and the probability www.businessperspectives.org of forced liquidation Received on: 7th of February, 2020 Abstract Accepted on: 23rd of April, 2020 Published on: 4th of May, 2020 The development of a global economy is impossible without economic ups and downs, which disrupt economic stability. The growth of the crisis in Ukrainian companies is no exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Jsc Sstc Structure
    STATE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CENTER OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION Saint-Petersburg 2014 3/3/2016 JSC SSTC STRUCTURE Sudotekhnologiya Founded in 1939 Research and Production Company Soyuzproektverf Design Company Armas Design Bureau Vostok Design Bureau Rumb Research Center Personnel: over 1000, Foreign Economic Company including 9 Doctors of Science and 35 Candidates of Science 295 interns SSTC Moscow Representative Office 2 www.sstc.spb.ru MAIN FIELDS OF ACTIVITY Development of Creation, re-equipping, Technological support of ship and advanced technologies modernization, and retrofitting of vessel design and construction for shipbuilding shipbuilding enterprises Design- and technological support of on-shore basing, Des iign of fihifishing, fihfish- maintenance and repair of processing and research vessels ships Developppgment and producing Development of nuclear-powered of the new-generation ship and nuclear support vessel shipboard pipeline fittings disposal technologies Carrying out of industrial and inter- Development and producing of Information industrial functions (labor protection, technological equipment technologies environment protection, etc.) 3 www.sstc.spb.ru PROJECTS OF CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION AND RETROFITTING OF SHIPBUILDING FACILITIES 4 PROJECTS OF CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION AND RETROFITTING OF SHIPBUILDING FACILITIES . Yards for construction and repair of any type ships . Ports, port loading facilities for containers and general cargoes, oil and gas terminals . Plants constructing floating reinforced-concrete and metal berths, floating
    [Show full text]
  • Ship-Breaking.Com Information Bulletins on Ship Demolition, # 15 - 18 from January 1St to December 31St, 2009
    Ship-breaking.com Information bulletins on ship demolition, # 15 - 18 from January 1st to December 31st, 2009 Robin des Bois 2010 Ship-breaking.com Information bulletins on ship demolition Summary Global Statement 2009 : the threshold of 1,000 vessels is reached … 3 # 18, from September 25th to December 31st …..……………………........ 4 (The nuclear flea market, Europe : when there is a will there is a way, China, car ferries) # 17, from June 27th to September 24th …..………….……………………... 45 (Inconsistency in the United States, A good intention in the United Kingdom ?, the destocking continues) # 16, from April 4th to June 26th …...………………………………..………... 76 (MC Ruby, the economic crises continues, shaky policy in Bangladesh) # 15 fromJanuary 1st to April 3rd ……..……………………..………………. 101 (Goodbye Bangladesh, hello Philippines ?, car carriers, the rush continues) Press release January, 27th, 2010 Global statement 2009 of vessels sent to demolition : The threshold of 1,000 vessels is reached For four years, Robin des Bois has been studying the demolition market via the mobilisation and the analysis of over thirty different bibliographical sources. Robin des Bois counted 293 vessels sold for demolition in 2006, 288 in 2007 and 456 in 2008. In 2009, 1,006 vessels have left the waters, representing more than twice the 2008 total and three times the 2006 total. The total weight of recycled metal reached more than 8.2 million tons, five times the total amount of 2006. During this record year the pace of vessels leaving the oceans during the summer months has barely slowed down. The worldwide financial crisis weighed considerably on trade exchange; big ship owners have massively sent for demolition their oldest ships to adapt to the dropping of freight rates and to draw benefits from their recent ships.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Development
    Укр Eng Search Menu Purchase price Tenders History and development NIBULON’s central office is located in Mykolayiv city which is a regional centre of the southern part of Ukraine. The region is considered to be an agrarian one. According to the historical documents, at the end of the 19th century this region was among the leaders in grain production. In addition, Mykolayiv is an important sea transport crossing. On April 10, 1862, the State Council adopted a resolution to open MykolayivCommercialPort and to set up the customs office. Mykolayiv has become an important grain export centre. In the ‘80s, the average annual volume of grain for export from MykolayivPort was more than 23 million poods of grain (a "pood" is a Russian measure of weight; 1 pood equals to 16kg). In 1893, a grain elevator was built in Mykolayiv Commercial Port. The grain and bread products were among the basic products exported from Mykolayiv region. The grain export infrastructure was gradually developing, involving more people in the grain trade. Wheat exports in bumper years (1905, 1910) comprised 50 million poods. The establishment of the Soviet Union and the formation of the planned economy interrupted the trends in the grain trade development. However, after 1917 the region retained its importance in the domestic grain production. After the Second World War, the grain produced in Ukraine, including Mykolayiv region, played an important role in satisfying the aggregate demand for grain crops in the Soviet Union territory. In 1990, Ukraine confirmed its considerable potential in grain production, having achieved a gross yield of more than 51 million tons of grain at the crop yield of 3.51 tons per hectare.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship-Breaking.Com # 27 – May 2012 – Robin Des Bois - 1/74 Demolition on the Job (Continued)
    Bulletin of information and analysis May 7, 2012 on ship demolition # 27 from January 1 to April 15, 2012 Ship-breaking.com An 83 year old veteran leaves for ship-breaking. The Great Lakes bulker Maumee left for demolition at the Canadian ship-breaking yard at Port Colborne (see p 61). At Port Huron(United States), November 2010 © Fred Miller Table of Contents Demolition on the job (continued) 2 Gas tanker 18 Ro Ro 50 The European Union surrenders 4 Ferry 20 Bulk carrier 51 The Senegal project 4 Passenger ship 22 Car carrier 70 The Robin des Bois Mailbox 5 General cargo 23 Miscellaneous 70 A Tsunami of Scrapping in Asia 7 Container ship 39 The END : Pacific Princess, the Love 72 Oil tanker – Exxon Valdez 8 (Fish) Factory ship 46 Boat is not entertaining anymore Chemical tanker 16 Reefer 46 Sources 74 A sea lion loses a place of refuge. The Akademik Vavilov has left for demolition in India (see the Reefer section on p 46). San Antonio Este, (Chile), January 2009 © Marinetraffic Ship-breaking.com # 27 – May 2012 – Robin des Bois - 1/74 Demolition on the job (continued) South Pacific The Astrolabe reef – April 4, 2012 © Maritime New Zealand The wreck of the Rena, run aground on a New Zealand reef October 5, 2011, suffered new injuries during the recent storms and new waves of waste, oil and containers have been spilled. Around 250 containers remain prisoner on the wreck. Clean-up efforts for waste on the beach continue. To make an example, two employees of the company entrusted with the dismantling of the wreck were fired for having drunk, without moderation, bottles of Sauvignon that had escaped from their container.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship-Breaking.Com Information Bulletins on Ship Demolition, # 12 - 14 from January 1St to December 31St, 2008
    Ship-breaking.com Information bulletins on ship demolition, # 12 - 14 from January 1st to December 31st, 2008 Robin des Bois 2009 Press Release February 3rd 2009 Global Statement 2008 of shipping vessels Sent to Demolition For the third consecutive year, the association Robin des Bois has studied in detail the reality of the ship- breaking market through the mobilisation and the analysis of about thirty diverse and specialised bibliographical sources. In 2006, Robin des Bois tallied 293 vessels sold for demolition and 288 in 2007. In 2008, 456 vessels have left the ocean. This large increase of vessels to be demolished (+ 58%), follows suit with the total weight of recycled metals: 3.7 million ton in 2008 against 1.7 million in 2007, i.e. more than double. The flow of vessels leaving the oceans in 2008 was dense and even accelerated towards the end of the year. The prices offered by the Asian ship-breaking yards at the beginning of the year continued to rise up until summer, they reached record averaging prices of around 800 $ per ton. The ship-owners took advantage to sell old and/or large vessels, in particular a large number of VLCC tankers (Very Large Crude Carrier). During autumn, for a while the decrease in selling rates of metals and the financial crisis disorganised the ship-breaking market: uncertainty in prices, difficulties in obtaining the cash finances or the letters of credit slowed down transactions and negotiations. The result was that China became a more stable and attractive destination than their Indian subcontinent competitors.
    [Show full text]