DOCSLIB.ORG

Undular Jump, Numerical Model and Sensitivity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Undular Jump, Numerical Model and Sensitivity Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna FACOLTÀ DI SCIENZE MATEMATICHE, FISICHE E NATURALI Corso di Laurea specialistica in Fisica Dipartimento di Fisica UNDULAR JUMP NUMERICAL MODEL AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Tesi di laurea di: Relatore: MICHELE RAMAZZA Prof. RAMBALDI SANDRO Correlatori: Prof. MANSERVISI SANDRO Dott. CERVONE ANTONIO Sessione III Anno Accademico 2007-2008 2 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................5 Sommario.............................................................................................................................................5 List of symbol ....................................................................................................................................6 1.Introduction ....................................................................................................................................8 1.1.Open channel flow.................................................................................................................8 1.1.1.Introduction....................................................................................................................8 1.1.2.Classification of open channel flows.........................................................................8 1.1.3.Complexity ....................................................................................................................8 1.2.Bases of open channel hydraulics ...................................................................................10 1.2.1.Supercritical and subcritical flows..........................................................................10 1.2.2.Momentum equation..................................................................................................11 1.2.3.Momentum function...................................................................................................11 1.2.4.Critical Flow ...............................................................................................................12 1.3.Hydraulic jump ....................................................................................................................12 1.3.1.Definition of hydraulic jump....................................................................................12 1.3.2.Undular jump...............................................................................................................13 1.3.3.Undular bore................................................................................................................14 1.3.4.Morning Glory............................................................................................................15 1.3.5.Two dimensional Approach.....................................................................................16 1.3.6.Momentum function balance...................................................................................16 1.3.7.Undular surge, state of art ......................................................................................17 2.Open channel numerical modelling.........................................................................................18 2.1.Fluent......................................................................................................................................18 2.1.1.Introduction for open channel simulations with Fluent...................................18 2.1.2.User steps for open channel flow simulations ....................................................18 2.2.Generic fluid flow equations ............................................................................................19 2.2.1.Variables........................................................................................................................19 2.2.2.Continuity and momentum equations ..................................................................19 2.2.3.Transport equation discretization..........................................................................19 2.2.4.Time evolution ............................................................................................................20 2.2.5.Evaluation of gradients and derivatives ...............................................................21 2.3.Volume of fluid, VOF..........................................................................................................21 2.3.1.Overview ......................................................................................................................21 2.3.2.Geo-reconstruction method.....................................................................................21 2.4.Pressure based solver ........................................................................................................22 2.4.1.Overview of pressure based solver.........................................................................22 2.4.2.Discretization of continuity and momentum equations....................................22 2.4.3.Coupled solver ............................................................................................................23 2.4.4.Multigrid method.......................................................................................................23 2.5.Grid ........................................................................................................................................23 2.6.Standard turbulence model...............................................................................................24 2.7.Wall functions ......................................................................................................................25 3.Undular jump simulation............................................................................................................27 3.1.Numerical modelling ........................................................................................................27 3.1.1.Introduction to undular jump simulation.............................................................27 3.1.2.Operating conditions..................................................................................................27 3.1.3.Boundary: velocity inlet ...........................................................................................28 3 3.1.4.Boundary: turbulent inlet quantities ....................................................................28 3.1.5.Boundary: pressure outlet.........................................................................................29 3.1.6.Standard channel.........................................................................................................29 3.2.Model validation .................................................................................................................30 3.2.1.Grid sensitivity ...........................................................................................................30 3.2.2.Outlet sensitivity .......................................................................................................33 3.2.3.Turbulent inlet sensitivity........................................................................................33 3.2.4.Undular jump experiment .......................................................................................36 3.2.5.Free surface data comparison .................................................................................37 3.3.Undular jump fields.............................................................................................................38 3.3.1.Velocity fields ..............................................................................................................38 3.3.2.Static pressure profiles...............................................................................................38 3.3.3.Vorticity field...............................................................................................................40 3.4.Undular jump sensitivity analysis...................................................................................41 3.4.1.Velocity inlet profile ..................................................................................................41 3.4.2.Turbulent kinetic energy .........................................................................................44 3.4.3.Froude number ...........................................................................................................45 3.4.4.Instability for critical waves.....................................................................................49 4.Conclusions....................................................................................................................................51 4.1.Undular jump ......................................................................................................................51 4.1.1.General considerations..............................................................................................51 4.1.2.Necessary parametrized models..............................................................................51 4.1.3.Sensitivity.....................................................................................................................52 4.1.4.Essential physical conditions...................................................................................52 4.1.5.Wave characteristic, dependencies from Froude number.................................52 4.2.Applicability of the model
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Multidiagnostic Investigation of the Mesospheric Bore Phenomenon Steven M
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. A2, 1083, doi:10.1029/2002JA009500, 2003 A multidiagnostic investigation of the mesospheric bore phenomenon Steven M. Smith,1 Michael J. Taylor,2 Gary R. Swenson,3 Chiao-Yao She,4 Wayne Hocking,5 Jeffrey Baumgardner,1 and Michael Mendillo1 Received 24 May 2002; revised 3 September 2002; accepted 5 September 2002; published 20 February 2003. [1] Imaging measurements of a bright wave event in the nighttime mesosphere were made on 14 November 1999 at two sites separated by over 500 km in the southwestern United States. The event was characterized by a sharp onset of a series of extensive wavefronts that propagated across the entire sky. The waves were easily visible to the 1 naked eye, and the entire event was observed for at least 5 2 hours. The event was observed using three wide-angle imaging systems located at the Boston University field station at McDonald Observatory (MDO), Fort Davis, Texas, and the Starfire Optical Range (SOR), Albuquerque, New Mexico. The spaced imaging measurements provided a unique opportunity to estimate the physical extent and time history of the disturbance. Simultaneous radar neutral wind measurements in the 82 to 98 km altitude region were also made at the SOR which indicated that a strong vertical wind shear of 19.5 msÀ1kmÀ1 occurred between 80 and 95 km just prior to the appearance of the disturbance. Simultaneous lidar temperature and density measurements made at Fort Collins, Colorado, 1100 km north of MDO, show the presence of a large (50 K) temperature inversion layer at the time of the wave event.
    [Show full text]
  • DETERMINING the LOCATION of HYDRAULIC JUMP by MODEL TEST and HEC-2 FLOW ROUTING/ a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Fritz
    L-DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF HYDRAULIC JUMP BY MODEL TEST AND HEC-2 FLOW ROUTING/ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ College of Engineering and Technology Ohio University In Partial Fulment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Science by Chen-Feng Li, 4 August, 1995 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author gratefdly acknowledges the hanicial support fiom my family, advisor Dr. Chang (Civil Engineering Dept., Ohio University) and Feng Chia University (Taiwan). The author would like to thank the Civil Engineering Department for the help they provided by supplying the various equipment used for my studies. The author also wants to thank those who have helped in my thesis writing. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................iv LIST OF TABLES ...................................vii LIST OF FIGURES .................................. viii LIST OF SYMBOLS ..................................xii I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 1 I. 1 Background of Study .......................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Study ............................ 2 1.3 Buckingham PI Theorem and Dynamic Simulation ........... 2 1.4 Experiments and Requirements ..................... 3 I .5 The FUTURE Development of the Study ................ 4 I1 . SELECTED LITERATURE REVIEW ..................... 6 11 . 1 Theoretical Development of Hydraulic Jump .............. 6 II.2 Studies of Hydraulic Jump ....................... 6 LI.3 Channel Slope and Hydraulic Jump ................... 8 v 11.4 Length and Location of Hydraulic Jump .................11 II.5 Force and Hydraulic Jump ........................14 II.6 Hydraulic Structures and Hydraulic Jump ................16 II.6.1 Hydraulic Jump in A Stilling Basin ...............17 II.6.2 Sluice Gate and Hydraulic Jump ................17 11.6.3 Sill and Hydraulic Jump ....................19 11.7 Computer Simulation ofHydraulic Jump Surface Profiles ........24 m .
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Undular Hydraulic Jump Downstream of a Sluice Gate
    CHARACTERISTICS OF UNDULAR HYDRAULIC JUMP DOWNSTREAM OF A SLUICE GATE KARAKTERISTIK LONCATAN HIDROLIK UNDULAR DI HILIR PINTU AIR Komang Arya Utama 1), Bambang Yulistiyanto 2), and Budi S. Wignyosukarto 2) 1) Lecturer in Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Gorontalo State University 2) Lecturer in Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Gadjah Mada University ABSTRACT Undular hydraulic jump is a hydraulic jump with a low Froude number which is marked by the emergence of a fixed roller. Information about the characteristics of undular hydraulic jump is still very poor. In order for the interests of the development of science, it is necessary to in-depth study of the hydraulic characteristics and phenomenon that appear on the undular hy- draulic jump. This research is applying the 2D physical model that used a tilting flume. Sluice gate is used as a tool to gene- rate the undular hydraulic jump. Measurement of distance and depth using a point gauge while the flow velocity was measu- red using a Nixon Streamflo 422 Currentmeter. Circulation flow is driven by using water pumps with discharge 15 l/s and 30 l/s. The results of this study indicate that the maximum flow velocity of dimensionless velocity distribution are at 0.5 - 0.9. Lowest value of Froude number obtained in running model Q9A1 is Fr1 = 1.197 and its highest value obtained in running mo- del Q3A1 is Fr1 limit = 2.258. The wave steepness is mild with a slope range are 0.1 to 0.3 or 10% to 30%. The length and height of the wave form are reduce at the first, second, third and so on until the condition of conjugate depth (y3).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Turbulent Hydraulic Jump Over a Transitional Rough Bed of a Rectangular Channel: Universal Relations Noor Afzal Aligarh Muslim University, India
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Civil Engineering Faculty Publications Civil Engineering 2011 Analysis of Turbulent Hydraulic Jump over a Transitional Rough Bed of a Rectangular Channel: Universal Relations Noor Afzal Aligarh Muslim University, India A. Bushra University of Nebraska-Lincoln Abu Seena Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/civilengfacpub Part of the Hydraulic Engineering Commons Afzal, Noor; Bushra, A.; and Seena, Abu, "Analysis of Turbulent Hydraulic Jump over a Transitional Rough Bed of a Rectangular Channel: Universal Relations" (2011). Civil Engineering Faculty Publications. 54. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/civilengfacpub/54 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil Engineering at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Civil Engineering Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Journal of Engineering Mechanics 137:12 (2011), pp. 835-845; doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM .1943-7889.0000294 Copyright © 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers. Used by permission. Submitted August 9, 2010; approved June 27, 2011; published online June 29, 2011. digitalcommons.unl.edu Analysis of Turbulent Hydraulic Jump over a Transitional Rough Bed of a Rectangular Channel: Universal Relations Noor Afzal,1 A. Bushra,2 and Abu Seena3 1. Visiting Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea, and Faculty of Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India 2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • An Undular Bore and Gravity Waves Illustrated by Dramatic Time-Lapse Photography
    AUGUST 2010 C O L E M A N E T A L . 1355 An Undular Bore and Gravity Waves Illustrated by Dramatic Time-Lapse Photography TIMOTHY A. COLEMAN AND KEVIN R. KNUPP Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama DARYL E. HERZMANN Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa (Manuscript received 24 March 2010, in final form 17 May 2010) ABSTRACT On 6 May 2007, an intense atmospheric undular bore moved over eastern Iowa. A ‘‘Webcam’’ in Tama, Iowa, captured dramatic images of the effects of the bore and associated gravity waves on cloud features, because its viewing angle was almost normal to the propagation direction of the waves. The time lapse of these images has become a well-known illustration of atmospheric gravity waves. The environment was favorable for bore formation, with a wave-reflecting unstable layer above a low-level stable layer. Surface pressure and wind data are correlated for the waves in the bore, and horizontal wind oscillations are also shown by Doppler radar data. Quantitative analysis of the time-lapse photography shows that the sky brightens in wave troughs because of subsidence and darkens in wave ridges because of ascent. 1. Introduction et al. 2010). There is typically an energy imbalance across the bore. The form of the dissipation of the energy is During the morning hours of 6 May 2007, an intense related to the bore strength h /h ,whereh is the initial atmospheric bore, with a pressure perturbation of 4 hPa, 1 0 0 depth of the stable layer and h is its postbore depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow-Water Theory and Channel Flow with Hydraulic Jump: Non-Steady Consideration
    www.ccsenet.org/mas Modern Applied Science Vol. 6, No. 1; January 2012 Shallow-Water Theory and Channel Flow with Hydraulic Jump: Non-Steady Consideration Asuquo E Eyo Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected] Received: August 15, 2011 Accepted: November 17, 2011 Published: January 1, 2012 doi:10.5539/mas.v6n1p50 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mas.v6n1p50 Abstract We examine the classical hydraulic jump in an open channel flow and show that it can be qualitatively understood using the model, namely, equations of shallow-water type. In the analysis, we consider the following cases: (i) unsteady, one dimensional flow of a liquid in an open channel, (ii) uniform and smooth flow with the channel bed flat and viscosity neglected almost everywhere, and (iii) a steady uniform flow U from left (positive flux) with the flow elsewhere taken to be two dimensional. Based on this model the relation for the speed of propagation of the jump in terms of depth ratio is obtained. We employ the method of characteristics and the Riemann invariants to determine the precise location and time of the onset of the hydraulic ump. Our analysis reveals that the location xJ and time tJ of the jump formation are influenced by the initial acceleration of the fluid. Specializations are later made to the cases where the initial acceleration is positive and finite, negative, infinite. Results are obtained in each of these cases. Keywords: Equations of shallow-water type, Channel flow, Hydraulic jump, Method of characteristics, Remann inivariants 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity Currents
    Vorticity-based Analytical Models for Internal Bores and Gravity Currents Zac Borden and Eckart Meiburg UC Santa Barbara • Motivation - Hydraulic jumps - Internal bores - Gravity currents • Earlier modeling approaches • Circulation-based modeling • Summary and outlook Hydraulic jumps Laminar circular hydraulic jump: Hydraulic jumps Hydraulic jump in a dam spillway: Hydraulic jumps Hydraulic jump in a dam spillway: Hydraulic jumps Tidal bore on the river Severn: Internal bore Undular bore in the atmosphere (Africa): Internal bore Atmospheric bore (Iowa): Analytical models for stratified flows Single-layer hydraulic jump (Rayleigh 1914): Note: Simulation based on continuity + NS eqns. (mass, momentum) In reference frame moving with the bore: steady flow U1 hf ρ1 U ha Task: Find U, U1 as f (hf , ha) Mass conservation: Horiz. momentum conservation: → where and Analytical models for stratified flows (cont’d) Two-layer internal bore for small density contrast (Boussinesq): Find U, U1, U2 as f (hf , ha , H, g’) Have 3 conservation laws: - mass in lower layer: - mass in upper layer: - overall horiz. mom.: th But: pressure difference ptr – ptl appears as additional 4 unknown → closure assumption needed! Two-layer internal bores (Boussinesq) Closure assumption by Wood and Simpson (1984): no energy dissipation in the upper layer → apply Bernoulli eqn. along the top wall: → where , and Alternative closure assumption by Klemp et al. (1997): no energy dissipation in lower layer → apply Bernoulli along lower wall: → Two-layer internal bores (Boussinesq)
    [Show full text]
  • Flow and Sediment Transport at Hydraulic Jumps
    FLOW AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AT HYDRAULIC JUMPS BY ROBERT GORDON MACDONALD A thesis submitted to the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author's prior, written consent. i Acknowledgements Thank you to Jan Alexander, Mark Cooker and John Bacon for all their help supervising this research. Jan has paid particular attention to provide me academic opportunities and I am grateful for the experience I have gained under her supervision. Mark has influenced me to present difficult discussions calmly and his quiet humour is an inspiration. John remained enthusiastic even after moving into a commercial job. Various people helped the physical undertaking of the research. Trevor Panter and Gareth Flowerdew made most of the equipment mounts for the UEA research flume, and provided engineering advice for my less than usual requests. Trevor also made the conveyor that I used to put sediment into the flume. Brendan, Emily, Estelle, James, John Brindle, Judith, Rob, Sheila and Stuart helped with the experiments. James had the dubious pleasure of being my best man and John Brindle the dubious pleasure of being my passenger the first time I drove a van, and of “reading the map”. I am grateful to Jan Alexander and Sheila Davies who took some of the laboratory photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion of Rock and Soil Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis Section D – Embankments and Foundations Chapter D-1
    Erosion of Rock and Soil Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis Section D – Embankments and Foundations Chapter D-1 Last modified July 2018, presented July 2019 Outline • Objectives • Key Concepts • Erosion Process • Rock Erosion Considerations • Soil Erosion • Takeaway Points Objectives • Understand the input to methods and models for estimating erosion, and how it is obtained • Be able to use this information as part of estimating the probability of erosion leading to failure under various potential failure modes • (Estimating the probability of failure due to rock or soil erosion is covered in other chapters) Key Concepts • Many potential failure modes require erosion of rock or soil to result in dam breach, such as: • Overtopping erosion of an embankment • Overtopping erosion of a concrete dam abutment or foundation • Erosion of an unlined spillway or river channel • Erosion of an unlined plunge pool (leading structural undermining) • Erosion of the spillway foundation where floor slabs have been damaged or lost • Initiation of erosion does not equate to failure • Judgement must be made concerning the progression of erosion over time (rate of erosion, duration of loading, progressive failure, etc.) • It is important to consider erosion extent as well as the erosion potential 4 Erosion Process How Erosion Starts • Erosion can occur under high velocity flows which cause high soil/rock detachment/plucking rates • A discontinuity exists which allows flow to concentrate, or changes the flow regime from sheet to turbulent • Possible sources of discontinuities are: • Slope changes in downstream slope (flat slope changes to steep slope) • Obstacles such as trees, vegetation, guard rails, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimal Analytical Model for Undular Tidal Bore Profile
    PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Related content - An integrable evolution equation for Minimal analytical model for undular tidal bore surface waves in deep water R A Kraenkel, H Leblond and M A Manna profile; quantum and Hawking effect analogies - SHARP: A Spatially Higher-order, Relativistic Particle-in-cell Code Mohamad Shalaby, Avery E. Broderick, To cite this article: M V Berry 2018 New J. Phys. 20 053066 Philip Chang et al. - Spacetime representation of topological phononics Pierre A Deymier, Keith Runge, Pierre Lucas et al. View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 188.184.3.52 on 08/06/2018 at 13:44 New J. Phys. 20 (2018) 053066 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aac285 PAPER Minimal analytical model for undular tidal bore profile; quantum and OPEN ACCESS Hawking effect analogies* RECEIVED 19 February 2018 M V Berry REVISED H H Wills Physics Laboratory, Tyndall Avenue, BS8 1TL, United Kingdom 20 April 2018 ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION E-mail: [email protected] 4 May 2018 Keywords: wave, Hamiltonian, caustic, Airy function, nonlinearity, horizon, soft modes PUBLISHED 31 May 2018 Original content from this Abstract work may be used under Waves travelling up-river, driven by high tides, often consist of a smooth front followed by a series of the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 undulations. A simple approximate theory gives the rigidly travelling profile of such ‘undular licence. hydraulic jumps’, up to scaling, as the integral of the Airy function; applying self-consistency fixes the Any further distribution of this work must maintain scaling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life Cycle of an Undular Bore and Its Interaction with a Shallow, Intense Cold Front
    886 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 138 The Life Cycle of an Undular Bore and Its Interaction with a Shallow, Intense Cold Front DANIEL C. HARTUNG Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin JASON A. OTKIN Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin JONATHAN E. MARTIN Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin DAVID D. TURNER Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, and Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin (Manuscript received 8 April 2009, in final form 29 September 2009) ABSTRACT The evolution of an undular bore and its associated wind shift, spawned by the passage of a shallow surface cold front over the Southern Great Plains of the United States, is examined using surface and remote sensing observations along with output from a high-resolution numerical model simulation. Observations show that a separation between the wind shift and thermodynamic properties of the front was induced by the formation of a bore over south-central Kansas around 0200 UTC 29 November 2006. By the time the front–bore complex passed through Lamont, Oklahoma, approximately 4 h later, the bore had reached its maximum intensity and its associated wind shift preceded the trailing baroclinic zone by 20 min. Within several hours the bore decayed and a cold frontal passage, characterized by a wind shift coincident with thermodynamic properties was observed at Okmulgee, Oklahoma. Thus, a substantial transformation in both the structural and dy- namical characteristics of the bore as well as its relationship to the parent surface front occurred during a short period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Overtopping of Walls and Stilling Basin Failure
    Overtopping of Walls and Stilling Basin Failure Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis Part F – Hydraulic Structures Chapter F-2 Last modified June 2017, presented July 2019 Objectives • Understand the factors and mechanisms that affect spillway chute wall overtopping failure • Understand how to construct an event tree to represent spillway chute wall overtopping failure • Understand how to consider stilling basin sweepout and failure Dam and Levee Overtopping of Walls and Stilling Basin Failure Modes • Failure of dams and levees due to overtopping is a common failure mode • 30% of dam failures in U.S. are attributed to overtopping • Many spillways are under designed for large discharges and could be vulnerable to chute capacity issues. • Many older dams and levees may have been designed for floods that no longer represent a remote flood event and design flood estimates have increased Case History: Failure of El Guapo Dam, Venezuela • El Guapo Dam spillway failed December 16, 1999 as a result of spillway failure from chute wall overtopping • Hydrology to size spillway based on hydrologic data transferred from another drainage basin (site specific hydrology is best) • During spillway construction chute walls were overtopped during a flood which triggered a new flood study (added a tunnel spillway) • El Guapo Dam never overtopped • Overtopping of chute walls initiated erosion of backfill behind chute walls and undermining and failure of spillway chute • Headcutting progressed upstream and led to reservoir breach • Spillway
    [Show full text]