DOCSLIB.ORG

JONATHAN R. ZATLIN Boston University • Department of History • 226 Bay State Road • Boston, MA 02215 • [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JONATHAN R. ZATLIN Boston University • Department of History • 226 Bay State Road • Boston, MA 02215 • Jzatlin@Bu.Edu JONATHAN R. ZATLIN Boston University • Department of History • 226 Bay State Road • Boston, MA 02215 • [email protected] PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Lecturer, University of Bonn (Germany), English Department, 1986-1988 Correspondent, Agence France-Presse/Extel, Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 1991-1992 Lecturer, History Department, University of California at Berkeley, Spring 2001 Assistant Professor, History Faculty, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001–2002 Assistant Professor, Department of History, Boston University, 2002–2008 Associate Professor, Department of History, Boston University, 2008-present Visiting Scholar, Institut für Geschichtswissenschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, 2011-2012 EDUCATION B.A., 1985: Yale University, English Literature Junior Year Abroad, 1983-1984: New York University in France/La Nouvelle Sorbonne MPhil., 1990: St. Antony’s College, University of Oxford, Modern European History Ph.D. 2000: University of California at Berkeley, Modern European History FELLOWSHIPS Arnold, Bryce, and Read Fund Scholarship, University of Oxford, 1989 Graduate Studies Committee Grant, University of Oxford, 1989 Raymond Carr Traveling Grant, St. Antony’s College, 1989 Overseas Research Student Award, British Government, 1989-1990 Mellon Foundation Dissertation Prospectus Fellowship, 1994 Heller Dissertation Fund Grant, UC Berkeley, 1994 Fulbright Research Grant, 1994-1995 Social Science Research Council Fellowship, Berlin Program, 1995-1996 Institute for the Study of World Politics Fellowship, 1996-1997 Hans Rosenberg Fellowship, UC Berkeley, 1996-1997, 1999-2000 Chancellor’s Dissertation-Year Fellowship, UC Berkeley, 1997-1998 Reinhard Bendix Memorial Research Fellowship, UC Berkeley, 1998-1999 Doreen B. Townsend Center for the Humanities Fellowship, UC Berkeley, 1998-1999 John L. Simpson Memorial Research Fellowship, UC Berkeley, 1999-2000 Dean’s Fund, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001 and 2002 Humanities Foundation Grant, Boston University, 2003 Canadian Centre for German and European Studies, 2003 Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, 2003 Humanities Foundation Fellowship, Boston University, 2004-2005 DAAD Faculty Research Fellowship, 2007 Charles A. Rsykamp Research Fellowship, American Council of Learned Societies, 2008-2009 Grant for Undergraduate Teaching and Scholarship, Boston University, 2009-2010 Jeffrey Henderson Senior Research Fellowship, Boston University, 2010-2011 Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Research Fellowship for Experienced Scholars, 2011-2012 Earhart Foundation Grant, 2011-2012 Zatlin - 2 Zatlin - 2 Co-Principal, Redesigning the Undergraduate Learning Experience (RULE) Grant, Boston University, 2011-2013 AWARDS Outstanding Graduate Student Instructor Award, UC Berkeley, Fall 1999 Fritz Stern Dissertation Prize, German Historical Institute, 2001 Finalist, Theodore Hamerow Dissertation Prize, 2002 Class of 2003 Gift in Recognition of Teaching, Boston University, 2003 Finalist, Social Science History Association President’s Book Award, 2006 H-German History Syllabus Prize, General Courses Category, 2008 Hans Rosenberg Article Prize (for “Integrating without Unifying”), 2010 DAAD Prize for Distinguished Scholarship in German and European Studies, 2011 AFFILIATIONS Member-at-Large, Executive Board, Central European History Society, 2013-2015 Non-Resident Fellow, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Johns Hopkins University, 2012-present Affiliate, Minda de Gunzberg Center for European Studies, Harvard University, 2002-present Founder and Convener, Boston German History Workshop, 2005-present Faculty Associate, Elie Wiesel Center for Judaic Studies, Boston University, 2005-present Senior Fellow, International History Institute, Boston University, 2007-present Faculty Member, Center for the Study of Europe, Boston University, 2012-present PUBLICATIONS BOOKS The Currency of Socialism. Money and Political Culture in East Germany (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007). Pamela Swett, S. Jonathan Wiesen, and Jonathan R. Zatlin (eds.), Selling Modernity: Advertising in Twentieth-Century Germany (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007). CHAPTERS IN BOOKS “Consuming Ideology. Socialist Consumerism and the Intershops, 1970-1989,” in Peter Hübner and Klaus Tenfelde (eds.), Arbeiter in der SBZ-DDR (Essen: Klartext-Verlag, 1999): 555-572. “’Polnische Wirtschaft, deutsche Ordnung’? Der Umgang mit den Polen in der DDR unter Honecker,” in Christian T. Müller and Patrice G. Poutrus (eds.), Ankunft-Alltag-Ausreise. Migration und interkulturelle Begegnungen in der DDR-Gesellschaft (Cologne and Weimar: Böhlau-Verlag, 2005): 295-315. With Pamela Swett and S. Jonathan Wiesen, “Introduction,” in Pamela Swett, S. Jonathan Wiesen, and Jonathan R. Zatlin (eds.), Selling Modernity: Advertising in Twentieth-Century Germany (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), 1-26. Zatlin - 3 Zatlin - 3 “Renverser l’alchimie: Le rôle de l’argent dans la RDA de Erich Honecker,” in Nadège Ragaru and Antonela Capelle-Pogacean (eds.), Vie quotidienne et pouvoirs dans les socialismes est-européens: au prisme de la consommation (Paris: CERI & Karthala, 2010), 143-74. “Rethinking Reunification: German Monetary Union and European Integration,” in: Peter C. Caldwell and Robert Shandley (eds.), German Unification: Expectations and Outcomes (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 85-133. “Getting Even: Asynchronous Development in East and West Germany after Unification” in: Konrad Jarausch (ed.), Growing Together? Processes and Problems of German Unification (Berghahn Books, July 2013). With Christoph Kreutzmüller, “Werner Sombart, Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben,” in: Wolfgang Benz (ed.), Handbuch des Antisemitismus. Judenfeindschaft in Geschichte und Gegenwart (K.G. Sauer, June 2013). “The Usurious Jew. Wilhelm Roscher and the Historical Mission of Homo economicus judaicus,” in: Michael Wildt, Moshe Zimmerman, and Christoph Kreutzmüller, National Economies: Racism and Economy in Europe between the Wars, 1918-1939 (in submission). ARTICLES “Hard Marks and Soft Revolutionaries: the Economics of Entitlement and the Debate over German Unification, November 9, 1989 - March 18, 1990,” German Politics and Society, Issue 33 (Fall 1994): 57-84. “Eingaben und Ausgaben. Das Petitionsrecht und der Untergang der DDR,” Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 45:10 (1997): 902-17. “The Vehicle of Desire: The Trabant, the Wartburg, and the End of the GDR,” German History 15:3 (1997): 358-80. “Making Money: The Bundesbank and the German Political Economy,” German Politics and Society 18 (Spring 2000): 134-51. “The Currency of Socialism: Money in the GDR and German Unification, 1971-1989,” Bulletin of the German Historical Institute 30 (2002): 99-110. "Making and Unmaking Money: Economic Planning and the Collapse of East Germany," Occasional Papers, Institute of European Studies, University of California at Berkeley, Paper Number 70428 (April 28, 2007): 1-28, URL: http://repositories.cdlib.org/ies/070428. “Scarcity and Resentment. Economic Sources of Xenophobia in the GDR, 1971-1989,” Central European History 40:4 (December 2007): 1-38. “Out of Sight. Industrial Espionage, Ocular Authority, and East German Communism, 1965- 1989,” Contemporary European History 17:1 (January 2008): 45-71. Zatlin - 4 Zatlin - 4 “Memorial: Gerald Donald Feldman (1937-2007),” Central European History 41:1 (March 2008): 281-88. “Monetary Policy and Political Legitimacy in the German Democratic Republic,” European Studies Forum 39:1 (Spring 2009): 5-11. “Integrating without Unifying: The East German Collapse and German Unity,” Central European History 43:3 (September 2010): 484–507. Winner of the Hans Rosenberg Article Prize of the Central European History Society. With Lou Ferleger, “The Truth About Why German Elites View Southern Europeans as Inferior and Falsely Judge History,” Alternet.com (http://www.alternet.org/world/156113/the_truth_about_why_german_elites_view_southern_ europeans_as_inferior_and_falsely_judge_history/), July 2, 2012, and Salon.com (http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/the_truth_about_why_german_elites_view_southern_eur opeans_as_inferior_and_falsely_judge_history_salpart/singleton/), July 3, 2012. “Kesef v’Sotsialism: Technon Kalkali v’Kets haRepublikah haMisrach Germanit,” Tabur: Ktav et Shanti l’Aniini Historiah, Havara, Tarbut v’Hagot shel Merkaz Iropah 5 (2012): 69-93. “Guilt by Association. Julius Barmat and German Democracy,” Mitteilungsblatt des Instituts für soziale Bewegungen (May 2013). REVIEWS Jost Hermand, Old Dreams of a New Reich, in German Politics and Society Issue 29 (Summer 1993): 147-52. Hans Modrow (ed.), Das Große Haus. Insider berichten aus dem ZK der SED and Erich Honecker, Moabiter Notizen. Letztes schriftliches Zeugnis und Gesprächsprotokoll vom BRD-Besuch 1987 aus dem persönlichem Besitz Erich Honeckers, in Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 44:1 (1996): 92-4. Jeffrey Kopstein, The Politics of Economic Decline in East Germany, 1945-1989, in German Politics and Society 15:4 (1997): 114-18. John C. Torpey, Intellectuals, Socialism and Dissent, in Theory and Society 27:1 (1998): 133-40. “Selling Modernity: Advertising and Public Relations in Modern German History,” in H- German, November 23, 2003. Derek J. Penslar, Shylock’s Children. Economics and Jewish Identity in Modern Europe, in Studies in Contemporary Jewry (April 2006). Philipp Heldmann, Herrschaft, Wirtschaft, Anoraks. Konsumpolitik in der DDR der Sechziger Jahre, in www.sehepunkte.de 6:9 (2006),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cosmopolitan Normalisation? the Culture of Remembrance of World War II and the Holocaust in Unified Germany
    臺大歷史學報第 53 期 BIBLID1012-8514(2014)53p.181-227 2014 年 6 月，頁 181-227 2014.1.13 收稿，2014.5.23 通過刊登 DOI: 10.6253/ntuhistory.2014.53.04 Cosmopolitan Normalisation? The Culture of Remembrance of World War II and the Holocaust in Unified Germany Christoph Thonfeld* Abstract Since the 1990s, Germany has dealt with the difficult integration of collective and individual memories from East and West Germany. Alongside the publicly more prominent remembrances of perpetration has occurred an upsurge in the memories of German suffering. At the same time, Europe has increasingly become a point of reference for national cultures of remembrance. These developments have been influenced by post-national factors such as Europeanisation and transnationalisation along with the emergence of a more multicultural society. However, there have also been strong trends toward renationalisation and normalisation. The last twenty years have witnessed a type of interaction with the ‘other’ as constructively recognised; while at the same time it is also excluded by renationalising trends. Researchers have described the combination of the latter two trends as the cosmopolitanisation of memory. This article adopts the diachronic perspective to assess the preliminary results since 1990 of the actual working of this cosmopolitanisation process within the culture of remembrance of World War II and its aftermath in Germany. Keywords: culture of remembrance, World War II, cosmopolitanisation, Europeanization, renationalization. * Assistant Professor at National ChengChi University, Dept. of European Languages and Cultures. Rm. 407, 4F., No.117, Sec. 2, Zhinan Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei City 11605, Taiwan (R.O.C.); E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the Ceremony Marking the 40Th Anniversary of the Hochschule Für Jüdische Studien Heidelberg, 17 June 2019
    The speech online: www.bundespraesident.de page 1 of 4 Speech by Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the ceremony marking the 40th anniversary of the Hochschule für Jüdische Studien Heidelberg, 17 June 2019 It is now 40 years since the Hochschule für Jüdische Studien (HfJS) opened its doors here in Heidelberg and I congratulate you all most warmly on this milestone which is certainly not something to be taken for granted! I am both delighted and honoured to be here today. Thank you very much for inviting me. All of you here in this room and many others besides have worked to ensure that it is impossible to imagine public and academic life in Germany without the HfJS. And that is why I am particularly grateful to you, the members of the Hochschule and Heidelberg University, to the Central Council of Jews in Germany, to Land Baden Württemberg and to all who support and promote the HfJS. Jewish Studies, the study of Judaism, have been a part of Germany for 200 years. We are also celebrating this today. And it is safe to say that it was a long journey from a meeting of young Jewish intellectuals in Berlin in 1819 of all years - the year of the Carlsbad Decrees, the year of the climax of the Restauration, the year of the strictest censorship of the press and monitoring of universities, but also the year of the violent Hep-Hep riots against Jews and against Jewish emancipation in many cities in Germany. It was a long journey through war, torture, persecution and the murder of milions in the 20th century to the creation of a Hochschule für Jüdische Studien.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainer Werner Fassbinder Edited By
    Peucker Edited by Brigitte Peucker is the Elias “A welcome reminder of Fassbinder’s astonishing breadth and continued A Companion to Leavenworth Professor of German resonance, this wide-ranging and brilliant collection of essays is an indispensable and a Professor of Film Studies at resource.” Rainer Werner Yale University. She is the author Anton Kaes, University of California, Berkeley of many essays on questions of Fassbinder representation in film and literature. “As varied, replete, and edgy as Fassbinder’s work itself, and as deftly edited, this Earlier books include Lyric Descent in montage of essays takes the measure not just of an oeuvre but of an epoch.” A Companion to Rainer Werner the German Romantic Tradition (1987), Garrett Stewart, author of Framed Time: Toward a Postfilmic Cinema Fassbinder is a groundbreaking Incorporating Images: Film and the collection. The first to engage fully with Rival Arts (1995), and The Material “Few filmmakers in the history of cinema have been as productive, as important, Rainer Werner Fassbinder A Companion to this important figure, whose untimely Image: Art and the Real in Film (2007). and as provocative as R. W. Fassbinder. With this stellar collection of essays, the death in 1982 is said to have marked achievements of his career unfold in all their astonishing range and diversity, the end of New German cinema. across all their beauties and shocks, with all their pleasures and difficulties.” Twenty-nine chapters consider this Timothy Corrigan, University of Pennsylvania controversial director’s contribution to German cinema, German history, gender and queer studies, and auteurship. Riding a wave of renewed interest in Fassbinder as a result of the increasing availability of his work, this collection puts the enigmatic director, actor, and character in context and considers the reach of his influence on a new generation of film makers.
    [Show full text]
  • REDEFINING HEIMAT: Language and the Search for Homeland in Modern German Jewish Writing
    REDEFINING HEIMAT: Language and the Search for Homeland in Modern German Jewish Writing by CHARLOTTE SCHALLM B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1998 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of History) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard^ THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 1999 © Charlotte Schallie, 1999 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date Oc-hrC-er j2} /?<?^ DE-6 (2/88) 11 Abstract The example of Jewish writers living in post-Shoah Germany can be taken as a case study for the ways in which language creates a homeland—a Heimat. Because the concept of Heimat lies outside the realm of national affiliations, German-speaking Jews have been able to redefine and establish a German homeland without having to associate themselves with the German national state. Heimat in language creates an environment which they can—for the most part—safely inhabit. Since the heterogeneous Jewish population of postwar Germany lacked a well-defined identity, German Jewish authors born or raised after 1945 needed a new way to find a sense of belonging.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Republic of Germany and the History of the Last Decades: Outline and Observations
    143 Joanna Andrychowicz-Skrzeba PhD Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Mission in Poland, Warsaw, Poland ARTICLES THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY AND THE HISTORY OF THE LAST DECADES: OUTLINE AND OBSERVATIONS Abstract The article aims to present concisely and chronologically the most critical stages of the formation and evolution of the Germans’ historical consciousness and identity after the end of the World War II. This process was based on how German society dealt with the National Socialist dictatorship (the focus of this paper) and the communist dictatorship of the Socialist Unity Party (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands, SED). Multiple factors have, over the years, contributed to how the Germans’ have dealt with their past and to the increasing awareness of this nation of its initially ineffaceable guilt and responsibility for the memory of World War II, as well as its homicidal role in this war. Among them were the post-war acceptance and integration of the “expellees” in both German states, the gradual confrontation of German society with the subject of the Holocaust itself and its mass-scale nature (for instance through touting the Nuremberg and following trials of war criminals and their assistants), and holding public debates on challenging issues related to the past (not imposed from above, but resulting from the needs of German society—for example some disputes between historians, the Walser-Bubis debate). Literary works often inspired the latter (for example, Günter Grass’s “Crabwalk,” Jörg Friedrich’s “The Fire”) and exhibitions presented in Germany (for example, on the crimes of the Wehrmacht). These considerations are a form of introduction Institute of National Remembrance 2/2020 144 to the second part of this article presenting the most important conclusions from an analysis, conducted by the author in 2014, of public speeches of prominent German (and Polish) politicians from the period 1989–2011 on subjects related to history.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Past Versus Shared Memory: Changing Perceptions in German-Jewish Relations
    MICHAEL BRENNER COMMON PAST VERSUS SHARED MEMORY Changing Perceptions in German–Jewish Relations One of the ironies of history is that Germany, whose death machines the Jews had just escaped, became a centre for Jewish life in post-war Europe. Between January and December 1946, the number of Jewish DPs in the American Zone of Germany alone increased from 40,000 to almost 150,000. Several hundreds or thousands of Jews now populated areas that had been ignored by Hitler in his efforts to make Europe judenrein because no Jews were living there. The size of the Jewish population in such unlikely Bavarian places as Feldafing, Föhrenwald, Pocking and Landsberg came close to that of the pre-war centres of Jewish life in Bavaria, such as Munich and Nuremberg. Bavaria was one of the very few places in Europe where, just one year after the Holocaust, the Jewish population rose to a level high- er than ever before. To be sure, this phenomenon was a temporary one, but during their stay in Germany, the Jewish DPs developed a wide-ranging net- work of religious, social and cultural institutions. This all changed with the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 and when the US began to open its doors shortly thereafter. Most Jewish DPs left Germany, but about 15–20,000 stayed on, founding new Jewish com- munities together with the remnant of German Jewry. The demographic sit- uation and the feeling of a temporary home lasted for the German-Jewish postwar community for several decades. A major transformation of German Jewry started, at least in the larger communities, in the 1980s, when the first generation of Jews born in postwar Germany acknowledged that both they and their children would probably continue to live on what the survivors had referred to as cursed soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtliches Organ Der Jüdischen Gemeinde Frankfurt Am Main Zum
    Euro 2,50 · 5780 תש“פ · Amtliches Organ der Jüdischen Gemeinde Frankfurt am Main September 2019 · 52. Jahrgang · Nr. 3 ZUM 20. TODESTAG VON IGNATZ BUBIS SEL. A. Seite 6 EDITORIAL Prof. Dr. Salomon Korn Rosch Haschana 2019 DAS NEUE SCHULJAHR hnken HAT BEGONNEN I Jens Foto: Ignatz Bubis – unvergessen Vor zwanzig Jahren ist Ignatz Bubis sel. A. gestorben. Wir, die Mitglieder der Jüdischen Gemeinde Frankfurt am Main, 67 verdanken ihm einen Neuanfang nach dem nationalsozialistischen Menschheitsverbrechen. Dass Ignatz Bubis über- lebt hatte, verdankte er neben seiner Intelligenz, seinem Überlebenswillen und seiner Lernfähigkeit jenen glücklichen Schüler*innen wurden in die E1 Klassen aufgenommen. Umständen und Zufällen, die ihn, im Unterschied zu Millionen anderer, immer wieder an einem gewaltsamen Tod vorbeigeführt haben. Bemerkenswert daran bleibt, dass er zu jenen Überlebenden gehört, deren Lebenswille nach dem Inferno des Jahrhundertverbrechens nicht gebrochen war. Neuanfang und Wiederaufbau nach jeder Zerstörung als Vermächtnis der Geschichte des eigenen Volkes bestimmten sein weiteres Leben und darin bezog er die Gemeinschaft, Mehr als der er angehörte, mit ein. Das Provisorische beenden 550 Seit Ignatz Bubis dem Gemeinderat der Jüdischen Gemeinde angehörte − seit 1965 − hat er versucht, das Provisorische dieses Zustandes zu beenden. Zu jener Zeit leitete er, der damals Vierzigjährige, die Liegenschaftskommission der Jüdi- schen Gemeinde. Als deren Hauptaufgabe sah er die Errichtung eines jüdischen Gemeindezentrums in Frankfurt. Groß Schüler*innen besuchen waren die Vorbehalte gegen ein solches Projekt, vor allem unter älteren Gemeindemitgliedern, die einen Neuanfang zurzeit die I. E. Lichtigfeld-Schule. im „Land der Mörder“ ablehnten. Er hat sich damals vieles anhören müssen − von Warnungen wie: es sei noch zu früh für ein solches Vorhaben bis hin zum Vorwurf der Nicht-Finanzierbarkeit und des Größenwahns.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Jericho: the Resurgence of German Jewish Life Since the Fall of the Berlin Wall
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 4-2012 Beyond Jericho: The Resurgence of German Jewish life since the Fall of the Berlin Wall Max Harrison Lazar College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Lazar, Max Harrison, "Beyond Jericho: The Resurgence of German Jewish life since the Fall of the Berlin Wall" (2012). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 481. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/481 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beyond Jericho: The Resurgence of German Jewish life since the Fall of the Berlin Wall A thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in History from the College of William and Mary in Virginia. by Max Harrison Lazar Accepted For ___________________ __________________________________Dr. Tuska Benes __________________________________ Dr. Cindy Hahamovitch __________________________________ Dr. Jennifer Taylor Williamsburg, Virginia April 2012 1 Table of Contents List of Figures 3 Acknowledgements 4 Introduction 5 Chapter 1: “In the Wilderness” 20 Chapter 2: The Flood 38 Chapter 3: Contemporary German Jewish Life 55 Chapter 4: Visible Jewish Culture 71 Conclusion 94 Bibliography 97 2 List of Figures Figure 1: The Ignatz-Bubis-Gemeindezentrum in Frankfurt am Main 73 Figure 2: The Neue Synagoge in Berlin 76 Figure 3: The Neue Synagoge in Dresden 77 Figure 4: The Ohel-Jakob Synagoge at the St.-Jakobs-Platz in Munich 77 Figure 5: Christian Boltanski’s “Missing House” 81 Figure 6: Daniel Libeskind’s Jüdisches Museum in Berlin 84 3 Acknowledgements This thesis would not be possible without the help and encouragement of many individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Republic of Germany
    Federal Republic of Germany National Affairs AN 1992, GERMANY'S SECOND YEAR of unification, important develop- ments took place in spheres ranging from foreign policy to the treatment of foreign- ers to abortion laws. Many of these were related to the dynamics of nation and state building, as Germany assumed its new role as the wealthiest and most powerful state in post-1989 Europe. In foreign affairs, the most dramatic new development was the participation of the German military in international peacekeeping operations, first in the former Yugoslavia and later in Somalia. In January Germany became the first European state to recognize Slovenia and Croatia. In July Germany began to take part in the humanitarian airlift to Sarajevo. Additionally, Bonn sent a destroyer and three reconnaissance planes to monitor the UN embargo on Serbia and Montenegro. And in December Chancellor Helmut Kohl announced the initiation of humanitarian aid to be delivered by German military personnel to Somalia. These moves provoked heated discussion within Germany. The Bonn government justified its actions with the argument that since the use of arms was excluded, these measures did not constitute military actions and thus did not require parliamentary consent. In September Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel addressed the UN in New York, emphasizing Germany's wish to assume all the rights and obligations of a UN member, which could include a seat on the Security Council. In November Kinkel visited China and Japan, and in December the German Parliament ratified, by a large majority, the Maastricht treaty on a European economic, political, and cur- rency union.
    [Show full text]
  • Azadeh Sharifi
    PERFORMANCE PARADIGM 14 (2018) Azadeh Sharifi “Wir wollten ein Zeichen setzen”: Performance and Protest by Minorities in German Theatre “Wir wollten ein Zeichen setzen”. (“We want to send a signal”.)—Bühnenwatch On 12 February 2012, the evening of the performance of Unschuld (Innocence) by German playwright Dea Loher, a group of approximately 40 activists, who had met through a Facebook group called Bühnenwatch, gathered in the foyer of Deutsches Theater Berlin (DT Berlin).1 The protest was organised carefully; the activists had decided in the night to stage the protest the following day. They bought tickets separately and scattered themselves among the audience. At the first sight of a white actor in blackface on stage, they silently but simultaneously stood up and left the room. Their actions did not go unnoticed. The blackface actor stopped his performance and screamed at them: “Was wollt Ihr denn?” (“What do you want?”). They remained silent. Back in the foyer, the activists handed out flyers, explaining their silent intervention in the theatre space. Liebe Theaterbesucher_innen, Sie haben sich gerade Unschuld von Dea Loher in einer Inszenierung von Michael Thalheimer angesehen. Vielleicht haben Sie sich gefragt, oder gewundert, warum ein Teil des Publikums in dem Moment des Auftritts von Elisio und Fadoul, die hier von den weißen Schauspielern Andreas Döhler und Peter Moltzen mit schwarzer Schminke an Gesicht und Händen dargestellt wurden, aufstand und den Saal verließ. Wir wollten ein Zeichen setzen: dass wir eine Weiterführung der Tradition des Blackface und von allem, was damit zusammenhängt, nicht akzeptieren können und wollen. (Dear theatre audience, You have just seen Innocence by Dea Loher, directed by Michael Thalheimer.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazeta Vol. 24, No. 3 Summer 2017
    Janusz Makuch, Director, Jewish Culture Festival, Kraków, Summer 2017. Photo: Bartosz Dittmar Volume 24, No. 3 Gazeta Summer 2017 A quarterly publication of the American Association for Polish-Jewish Studies and Taube Foundation for Jewish Life & Culture Editorial & Design: Fay Bussgang, Julian Bussgang, Dr. Antony Polonsky, Shana Penn, Vera Hannush, Alice Lawrence, Maayan Stanton, LaserCom Design. Front Cover: 27th Jewish Culture Festival, Kraków. Photo: Bartosz Dittmar. Back Cover: Students in the Jewish cemetery, Beshenkovichi, Belarus. Photo: Sefer Center. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from Irene Pipes ................................................................................................... 2 Message from Tad Taube and Shana Penn ...................................................................... 3 FEATURE STORY The Memory Keepers: The Literary Legacy of the Karmel Sisters Part 1: The Poetry of Survival Taube Philanthropies .............................................................................................................. 4 Part 2: A Daughter Remembers Joy Wolfe Ensor ..................................................................................................................... 7 NEWS All Saints Church on Grzybowska Street declared “House of Life” Julian and Fay Bussgang ..................................................................................................... 12 Celebrating the Battles of the Polish Second Corps Julian and Fay Bussgang ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • „A Naye Yidishe Heym in Nidershlezye“ Polnische Shoah-Überlebende in Wrocław (1945–1949)
    S: I. M. O. N. SHOAH: I NTERVENTION. M ETHODS. DOCUMENTATION. Katharina Friedla „A Naye Yidishe Heym in Nidershlezye“ Polnische Shoah-Überlebende in Wrocław (1945–1949). Eine Fallstudie Abstract Heavy fighting around ‚fortress Breslau’ resulted in the German surrender on May 6, 1945 and almost completely destroyed the city. The following three years saw the ‚relocation’ of the city’s entire German population to the West. It was the beginning of the city’s great transfer period, which inevitably caused the losses of homes and identity crises: it included the ‚resettlement‘ of the German inhabitants, the settlement of Poles, the forced resettle- ment of the Ukrainian population, the expulsion of the returned members of the German- Jewish community as well as the directed settlement of Polish Shoah survivors. Breslau became Wrocław: the city was rid of German traces, utterly Polonized and, together with the entire area of Lower Silesia, celebrated as a „recovered territory“. The Polish settlers who surged into the city immediately after the end of the war, including Polish Jewish survivors, were supposed to find a new home there. This proved to be too great a challenge under the circumstances of the immediate post-war era: Wrocław was immersed in chaos and de- struction, the presence of its German inhabitants was still apparent throughout the city (at least until 1948), the reorganization of the Polish state structures as well as the political consolidation of power was only just underway. Moreover, other factors also contributed to the demolition of initial prospects that Jewish life would be established in post-war Poland.
    [Show full text]