Oil, Politics and Development in the Caspian Sea Region Chris Light

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oil, Politics and Development in the Caspian Sea Region Chris Light Caspian Sea Energy: Oil, Politics and Development in the Caspian Sea Region Chris Light CPE 825 01 May 2004 Table of Contents Objective 1 Geographical Areas of Interest 2 Caspian Sea 2 The Russian Federation 3 Islamic Republic of Iran 5 Republic of Azerbaijan 7 Republic of Kazakhstan 9 Republic of Turkmenistan 11 Oil Reserve Definitions 13 Caspian Sea Reserve Estimates 14 Caspian Oil Reserves in Perspective 16 Caspian Oil Production 17 Transportation of Caspian Petroleum Products to World Markets 18 Current Infrastructure 18 Proposed Projects 19 Project Development – Political and Economic Issues 20 Legal Debate on International Division of the Caspian Sea 22 Geopolitics in the Caspian Region 25 Summary 30 Works Cited 32 Appendices Appendix A: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2003 Appendix B: Oil and Gas Journal Worldwide Look at Reserves and Production Appendix C: Energy Information Administration Oil Export Routes and Options in the Caspian Sea Region Appendix D: 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Objective Oil and natural gas fuel the economies of the world. Energy consumption can be directly correlated to national development, impacting virtually every aspect of a society from national security to the average citizen’s standard of living. The technological advances of the last hundred years require governments to secure sizable reserves and reliable sources of petroleum. Since the infancy of the oil industry the Caspian region has played an important role in world events. As an example, the oil fields of Baku represented key strategic objectives in both World War I and World War II. Many have argued that the outcomes of these conflicts could have been significantly altered had Germany succeeded in seizing and exploiting these assets. Prior to 1991 the Caspian was, for all practical purposes, a Russian lake. The dissolution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1991 had a profound impact on the Caspian region. The conflicting interests of the newly independent nations surrounding the Caspian and the discovery of potentially enormous hydrocarbon reserves has once again thrust Caspian oil to the forefront of international politics. The purpose of this paper is to present the major issues impacting Caspian hydrocarbon development. Specifically, a number of topics including the regions geography, history, governments, politics and reserves will be introduced to provide the reader with the framework necessary to fully understand the current and future importance of the Caspian to the international community. After establishing this foundation, current and future projects as well as legal issues and disputes will be discussed. Finally, the reader will be introduced to the geopolitics of the region as well as the related topic of foreign investment. Ultimately, the goal of this paper is to provide the reader with a general, unbiased view of the Caspian region, its resources, historical and future challenges and its relevance to world petroleum markets. 1 Geographical Areas of Interest Caspian Sea The Caspian Sea is the largest lake in the world. Covering 144,000 square miles, this salt lake lies between Europe and Asia. It is bordered on the northeast by Kazakhstan, on the southeast by Turkmenistan, on the south by Iran, on the southwest by Azerbaijan, and on the northwest by Russia. The Caspian reaches its maximum depth of 3,200 feet in the south; the shallow northern half averages only about 17 ft. The Caucasus Mountains rise from the southwestern shore, and the Elburz Mountains parallel the southern coast. Although the Caspian receives inflows from five rivers including the Volga (which supplies more than 75% of its inflow), Ural, Emba, Kura, and Terek Rivers, it has no outlet. The damming and diversion of the Volga's water for industrial and residential use have been the leading reasons for the historical lowering of the Caspian's water level, a problem of serious proportions. Underlying the Caspian are some of the world's largest oil reserves, and the five surrounding countries, all with major stakes in oil-field development, have disputed zones of control. (Source: The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press) The current and future development of Caspian Sea oil reserves will be determined by those nations bordering the Caspian. These culturally and politically diverse nations include Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. A brief introduction and overview of each of these nations is presented as general background. 2 Russian Federation Background: With a land area almost twice the size of the United States the Russian Federation is the largest nation in the world. Despite an abundance of natural resources including large deposits of oil, natural gas, coal and thousands of miles of coastline Russia is not favorably located in relation to major sea lanes. Prior to 1991Russia was the epicenter of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). From 1917 to 1991Russia and its satellite nations were characterized by communist governments and tightly controlled command economies. In December 1991 the USSR splintered into 15 independent republics. Since then, Russia has struggled in its efforts to build a democratic political system and market economy to replace the strict social, political, and economic controls of the Communist period. In the Caspian Sea region Russia shares a border of 284 km with Azerbaijan and a border of 6,846 km with Kazakhstan. Additionally, Russia shares a border of 723 km with Georgia, a country which occupies a key geographical position between the Caspian Sea and the Black Sea. Other borders of political interest include shared borders with China, Mongolia and Ukraine measuring 3,645 km, 3,485 km, 3 and 1,576 km respectively. Russia’s maritime claims include territorial seas of 12 NM, an exclusive economic zone of 200NM and continental shelf zone of 200 meter depth or to the depth of exploitation. The Russian Federations population of nearly 145 million is composed of numerous ethnic groups. The largest ethnic group by far is Russian (81.5%) followed by Tatar (3.8%) and Ukrainian (3%). Major religions include Russian Orthodox and Muslim. The Russian Federation is a constitutional federation with a legal system based on civil law and judicial review of legislative acts. Important political figures include the Chief of State, President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and the head of the government, Premier Mikhail Mikhaylovich Kasyanov. Economic overview: Despite the best efforts of its leaders The Russian Federation is still struggling to establish a modern market economy. Russia is striving to establish stable conditions including low inflation rates in the 3-5% range, a strong central banking system, and an effective rule of law. If Russia ever hopes to become a member of the European Union (EU) they must attain these goals. In Russia’s first five years of independence the economy contracted severely as it struggled with the challenges associated with converting the economy from a centralized system to a market system. Following the 1998 depreciation of the ruble (60% depreciation) and a debt default by the government the economy subsequently rebounded, growing by an average of more than 6% annually in 1999-2002. In 2002 the estimated real GDP growth rate was 4.3%; however, the inflation rate during this period was 15%. The majority of the economic growth realized over the last few years can be directly linked to higher oil prices and the depreciation of the ruble. In Fiscal Year 2001 Russia received $979 million in economic aid from the United States and $200 million in aid from the EU. It is important to note that oil, natural gas, metals, and timber account for more than 80% of Russian exports, leaving the country vulnerable to swings in world prices. (Source: Central Intelligence Agency World Factbook) 4 Islamic Republic of Iran Background: Unlike the Russian Federation, Iran is ideally located in relation to major sea lanes. Iran’s eastern and southern borders include the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, considered vital sea lanes for crude oil transport. Prior to 1935 Iran was known as Persia. In 1979 Iran became an Islamic republic following the exile of the Shah. Conservative clerical forces established a theocratic system of government with ultimate political authority vested in a religious scholar. During 1980-88, Iran was involved in a war with Iraq over disputed territory; the outcome of the war was generally regarded as indecisive. In recent years poor economic conditions and dissatisfaction with the government has created pressure for political reform. Iran borders the Caspian Sea, with 740 km of the Caspian’s shoreline contained within its borders. In the Caspian Sea region Iran shares a border of 432 km with Azerbaijan (in addition to 179 km shared with the Azerbaijan-Naxcivan exclave) and a border of 992 km with Turkmenistan. Other borders of political interest include shared borders with Iraq (1,458 km), Afghanistan (936 km), Armenia (35 km), Pakistan (909 km), and Turkey (499 km). Iran’s maritime claims include a contiguous zone of 24 NM, territorial seas of 12 NM, an exclusive economic zone comprised of bilateral agreements or median lines in the Persian Gulf and a continental shelf zone defined by natural prolongation. Like Russia, Iran’s population of nearly 70 million people is composed of numerous ethnic groups. The five major ethnic groups include Persian (51%), Azeri (24%), Gilaki / Mazandarani (8%), and Kurd 7%. In addition a small number of Arab (3%) and Turkmen (2%) peoples also reside in Iran. Iran is almost exclusively Muslim with Shi'a Muslims comprising 89% of the population and Sunni Muslims accounting for 10% of the population. 5 The Islamic Republic of Iran is a theocratic republic containing 28 provinces. The Iranian legal system is based on Islamic principles of government.
Recommended publications
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Belait District
    BELAIT DISTRICT His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin Waddaulah ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Haji Omar ‘Ali Saifuddien Sa’adul Khairi Waddien Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei Darussalam ..................................................................................... Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin Waddaulah ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Haji Omar ‘Ali Saifuddien Sa’adul Khairi Waddien Sultan dan Yang Di-Pertuan Negara Brunei Darussalam BELAIT DISTRICT Published by English News Division Information Department Prime Minister’s Office Brunei Darussalam BB3510 The contents, generally, are based on information available in Brunei Darussalam Newsletter and Brunei Today First Edition 1988 Second Edition 2011 Editoriol Advisory Board/Sidang Redaksi Dr. Haji Muhammad Hadi bin Muhammad Melayong (hadi.melayong@ information.gov.bn) Hajah Noorashidah binti Haji Aliomar ([email protected]) Editor/Penyunting Sastra Sarini Haji Julaini ([email protected]) Sub Editor/Penolong Penyunting Hajah Noorhijrah Haji Idris (noorhijrah.idris @information.gov.bn) Text & Translation/Teks & Terjemahan Hajah Apsah Haji Sahdan ([email protected]) Layout/Reka Letak Hajah Apsah Haji Sahdan Proof reader/Penyemak Hajah Norpisah Md. Salleh ([email protected]) Map of Brunei/Peta Brunei Haji Roslan bin Haji Md. Daud ([email protected]) Photos/Foto Photography & Audio Visual Division of Information Department / Bahagian Fotografi
    [Show full text]
  • CITIES to BE TAMED? Standards and Alternatives in the Transformation of the Urban South
    CITIES TO BE TAMED? Standards and alternatives in the transformation of the urban South SECTION 1 PLACES OF INFORMALITY by Planum. The Journal of Urbanism ISSN 1723-0993 | n. 26, vol.1/2013 Proceedings published in January 2013 CONFERENCE PROMOTERS Spazicontesi/Contestedspaces Francesco Chiodelli Beatrice De Carli Maddalena Falletti Lina Scavuzzo SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Alessandro Balducci, Politecnico di Milano, Italy Camillo Boano, University College London, UK Bruno De Meulder, University of Leuven, Belgium Jorge Fiori, AA School of Architecture, UK Nabeel Hamdi, Oxford Brookes University, UK Agostino Petrillo, Politecnico di Milano, Italy Antonio Tosi, Politecnico di Milano, Italy KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Bruno De Meulder, University of Leuven, Belgium Nabeel Hamdi, Oxford Brookes University, UK Erez Tzfadia, Sapir College, Israel with the support of DiAP - Department of Architecture and Planning and School of Architecture and Society, Politecnico di Milano in collaboration with Laboratory of International Cooperation, DiAP, Politecnico di Milano These Proceedings include the papers accepted for presentation at the Conference ‘CITIES TO BE TAMED? Standards and alternatives in the transformation of the urban South’ held in Milan, Politecnico di Milano, on November 15 to 17, 2012. Only the Authors who were regularly registered for the Conference and agreed to publish their contributions were included in the Proceedings. For further information on the Conference programme and a complete list of speakers and presentations, please visit www.contestedspaces.info. Proceedings edited by Spazicontesi/Contestedspaces. CONTACT www.contestedspaces.info [email protected] © Copyright 2013 Planum. The Journal of Urbanism Via Bonardi 9, 20133 Milan, Italy Registered by the Court of Rome on 4/12/2001 under the number 524-2001 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Informal City and Rights in South East Asian Cities: the Cases of Kampung Improvement Programme and Baan Mankong
    The Bartlett Development Planning Unit DPU WORKING PAPER NO. 192 The informal city and rights in South East Asian Cities: the cases of Kampung Improvement Programme and Baan Mankong David Sweeting dpu Development Planning Unit DPU Working Papers are downloadable at: www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/latest/ publications/dpu-papers If a hard copy is required, please contact the Development Planning Unit (DPU) at the address at the bottom of the page. Institutions, organisations and booksellers should supply a Purchase Order when ordering Working Papers. Where multiple copies are ordered, and the cost of postage and package is significant, the DPU may make a charge to cover costs. DPU Working Papers provide an outlet for researchers and professionals working in the fields of development, environment, urban and regional development, and planning. They report on work in progress, with the aim to disseminate ideas and initiate discussion. Comments and correspondence are welcomed by authors and should be sent to them, c/o The Editor, DPU Working Papers. Copyright of a DPU Working Paper lies with the author and there are no restrictions on it being published elsewhere in any version or form. DPU Working Papers are refereed by DPU academic staff and/or DPU Associates before selection for publication. Texts should be submitted to the DPU Working Papers' Editor Étienne von Bertrab. Graphics and layout: Luz Navarro, Giovanna Astolfo and Paola Fuentes Development Planning Unit | The Bartlett | University College London 34 Tavistock Square - London - WC1H 9EZ Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 1111 - Fax: +44 (0)20 7679 1112 - www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu DPU WORKING PAPER NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Kampung Baru Mini Atlas
    KAMPUNG BARU ATLAS ASSETS What’s happening in KAMPUNG BARU PROFILE What are Kelurahan assets? Kampung Baru? Population = 3,683 Municipal facilities are # Households (HH) = 631 Kampung Baru is a center of municipal centers of civic life Average HH size = 5.8 facilities. The Balai Kota is located here as well as banks and the post office. Pop. by Age Good transportation connections 60+ Kampung Baru is visited by everyone 50 – 59 Streets and infrastructure in the city. Many houses are owned by 40 – 49 30 – 39 maintained families who live outside Solo. 20 – 29 Municipal Facilities in Kampung Baru 10 – 19 0 – 9 What are potential issues? Kampung Baru has a small population, but people from all Flooding of Pepe River about the condition of services can help over Solo visit the Kelurahan Kampung Baru’s Location in Solo people discuss what they want from the Need to focus education and for municipal services. The This Mini Atlas collects information about annual participatory budgeting process, health services on residents Kelurahan needs adequate Kampung Baru so everyone can see and musrenbang. Our goal is to make citizens infrastructure and services for Participation in musrenbang know what is going on. Information more informed about their communities. both visitors and residents. KAMPUNG BARU NEIGHBORHOOD MAP LEGEND Kantor Keluharan Kali Pepe (Community Center) JL. SUTARJO SH Masjid School Area of Flooding JL.ARIFIN River JL. KUSOMO YUDAN Bridge SOURCE: UO Kelurahan Survey, Google Earth, Bakosurtanal DATE: Jun. 2010 City Hall www.solokotakita.com PROJECT SPONSORS: JL. SUGIO PRANOTO JL. IMAM BONJOL JL. KUSMANTO JL.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogas Implementation As Waste Management Effort in Lembang Sub- District, West Bandung District
    IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Biogas Implementation as Waste Management Effort in Lembang Sub- district, West Bandung District To cite this article: H A Alberdi et al 2018 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 158 012031 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.202.126 on 25/09/2021 at 15:42 The 4th PlanoCosmo International Conference IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science1234567890 158 (2018) ‘’“” 012031 doi :10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012031 Biogas Implementation as Waste Management Effort in Lembang Sub-district, West Bandung District H A Alberdi1, S A H Sagala2, Y Wulandari1, S L Srajar2, D Nugraha2 1Resilience Development Initiative, Jalan Imperial 2 No. 52, Dago Asri, Bandung, Indonesia 2Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung, Indonesia Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract. As the population and economic activities increase, energy demand will increase significantly too. In the near future, Indonesia will have more limitations on fossil fuel based energy. Therefore, sources of renewable energy have to be found. On the other hand, rural areas in Indonesia suffer from lack of energy supply. Therefore, energy resilient villages need to be created. Kampung Areng in Cibodas Village, Lembang sub-district is one of the locations declared as an energy resilient village. This study focused on Kampung Areng due to previous information and studies that have shown that the farmers in this area are capable of generating renewable energy through conversion of animal waste using biogas digesters.
    [Show full text]
  • The State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan Annual Report 2015 Content
    THE STATE OIL FUND OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN ANNUAL REPORT 2015 CONTENT 1. ABOUT SOFAZ 2 2. FACTS AT GLANCE 6 3. GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY 8 3.1. SOFAZ management 8 3.2. Transparency and accountability 14 4. NATIONAL ECONOMY AND SOFAZ 18 4.1. Macroeconomic development 18 4.2. SOFAZ Revenues 25 4.3. SOFAZ Expenditures 30 5. INVESTMENT REPORT 38 5.1. Investment Strategy 38 5.2. SOFAZ Investment portfolio 43 5.3. SOFAZ Investment 65 portfolio performance 5.4. Risk management 69 6. 2015 SOFAZ BUDGET EXECUTION 72 7. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL 78 STATEMENTS OF SOFAZ APPENDIX 155 THE STATE OIL FUND OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN 01 ABOUT SOFAZ Objectives Legal framework for operating expenditures, are incorporated as part of an annual consolidated government budget presented SOFAZ’s activity is directed SOFAZ’s operations are to the Parliament for approval. to the achievement of the guided by the Constitution Thus, indirectly, all citizens following objectives: and laws of the Republic participate in the discussions of Azerbaijan, Presidential of the budget of SOFAZ. In decrees and resolutions, The State Oil Fund of the 1. Supporting macroeconomic compliance with this law, SOFAZ Statute and the Fund’s stability, participating in SOFAZ can only execute the regulations. ensuring fiscal-tax discipline expenditures envisaged by its Republic of Azerbaijan (SOFAZ) and decreasing dependence budget. on oil revenues while SOFAZ’s funding and stimulating development of withdrawal rules are clearly SOFAZ’s investment and was established in accordance the non-oil sector; defined by the “Statute risk management policies of State Oil Fund of the are defined by “Investment Republic of Azerbaijan” and Guidelines” and “Investment 2.
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    C 171/12 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.5.2020 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2020/C 171/07) This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Duna/Dunai’ Reference number PDO-HU-A1345-AM02 Date of communication: 9.2.2020 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Addition of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora, Újszilvás and Bácsszentgyörgy to the demarcated area (a) Product specification headings affected: IV. Demarcated area (b) Single document heading affected: Demarcated geographical area (c) Reasons: — The Wine Community Council of the Kunság Region (Kunsági Borvidék Hegyközségi Tanácsa) amended the product specification for the ‘Kunság/Kunsági’ PDO. The areas of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora and Újszilvás classified as Class I and II according to the vineyard cadastre of wine-producing regions were added to the demarcated area. The change affects the demarcated area in the product specification for the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO and has been included in this application. The characteristics of the areas included in the vineyard cadastre correspond to the demarcated area of the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO. Vine-growing is one of the traditional economic activities of local inhabitants. The classification of the wine region and the possibility to produce the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO generates significant employment and income in these municipalities and contributes greatly towards the local tourism industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Atlas
    FF II CC SS SS Field Information and Capital Elevation Coordination Support Section (Above mean sea level) Division of Operational Services UNHCR Country Office Croatia / National Office 3,250 to 4,000 metres Sources: / Liaison Office 2,500 to 3,250 metres UNHCR, Global Insight digital mapping 1,750 to 2,500 metres © 1998 Europa Technologies Ltd. UNHCR Field Office As of December 2009 1,000 to 1,750 metres UNHCR Field Unit 750 to 1,000 metres The boundaries and names shown International boundary 500 to 750 metres and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement Main road 250 to 500 metres or acceptance by the United Nations. Secondary road 0 to 250 metres g Name_of_the_workspace.WOR !! Villach !! !! !! !! Below mean sea level !! !! Davograd Railway !! Marcali !! Orosháza !! Maribor !! Szank !! !! Cortina d'Ampezzo !! !! !! Mursko Sredisce !! Kalocsa!! Kecel !! Mindszent !! !! !! Kiskunmajsa !! !! Nagykanizsa !! Jesenice Tolna !! Kiskunhalas !! !! Ptuj !! !! Hajós !! !! Hódmezövásárhely!! !! !! !! Tolmezzo !! Böhönye !! !! !! !! !! !! Cakovec !! !! Sostanj !! !! !! Forraaskut !! !! Kaposvár !! !! Balotaszállás!! !! !! !! !! Mezöhe !! Varazdin HUNGARY!! !! Jánoshalma !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Legrad !! !! Ruzsa !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Gemona del Friuli !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Csurgó !! !! Szeged !! Kranj !! Celje !! Nagyatád !! !! !! Ivanec !! !! SLOVENIA !! !! !! Makó !! Durmanec !! Komló !! Maniago !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Koprivnica !! Baja !! Horgos !! Nadlac ! !! Belluno !!
    [Show full text]
  • Forgalmazási / Értékesítési Pontok Jegyzéke
    FORGALMAZÁSI / ÉRTÉKESÍTÉSI PONTOK JEGYZÉKE S.sz Forgalmazó Elszámolásért felelős Székhely, telephely, Ügyfélfogadási, Hivatalos Telefon- Postacím: szervezet neve és forgalmazó neve, forgalmazási pont, ügyintézési idő e-mail cím: számok: (csak akkor kell kitölteni, ha nem egyezik meg az itt már rövidített neve: beosztása: értékesítési pont (nyitvatartási idő): megadott címmel) címe: 01. "Ho-Hó" Klub Gábris Katalin 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 8-16, Szo 8-11 info@hohocentrum. 06/76/418-059 6000 Kecskemét, Kecskemét HE pénztáros Füzes u. 6. hu Badacsony u. 1. 02. ZAL-KAH HE Szabari Bálint vállalk. 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 7-18, Szo: 7-13 kekmarlin@t- 30/924-2228 6000 Kecskemét, Katona J. u. 20. online.hu Katona J. u. 20. 03. ZAL-KAH HE Breki és Társa Bt. 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 8-17, Szo: 8-12 [email protected] 70/453-9854 6000 Kecskemét, B. Kovács Attila Vízöntő u. 33. Vízöntő u. 33. vállalk. 04. ZAL-KAH HE Kukac-Ka Horgászbolt 6000 Kecskemét, H-P: 8-18, Szo: 8-13 [email protected] 70/949-9010 6000 Kecskemét, Farkas Krisztián Március 15. u. 2. m Március 15. u. 2. vállalk. 06. Tiszakécske és Tapodi Zoltánné 6060 Tiszakécske, H-P: 9-12, 13-16-ig tiszakecskeshe@gma Tapodi Zoltánné 6060 Tiszakécske, Környéke Sport pénztáros Botond u. 4. Ért.pont: (jan.1-jún.30.) il.com 30/703-3754 Botond u. 4. Horgász Egyesület Filyó Tamás elnök 6060 Tiszakécske, K és P: 9-12, 13-16-ig Filyó Tamás Szent Imre tér 13. (júl.1-dec.31.) 20/470-8324 07. Dunapataji HE Mádiné Király 6328 Dunapataj, H-Sze 17-18, dunapatajishe@duna 20/332-5507 6328 Dunapataj, Henriette pénztáros Ordas u.
    [Show full text]
  • B Commission Implementing Decision (Eu
    02020D0047 — EN — 04.05.2020 — 003.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/47 of 20 January 2020 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 344) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 16, 21.1.2020, p. 31) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/114 of 24 January L 21 20 27.1.2020 2020 ►M2 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/134 of 30 January L 27 27 31.1.2020 2020 ►M3 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/175 of 6 February L 35 23 7.2.2020 2020 ►M4 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/210 of 14 February L 43 77 17.2.2020 2020 ►M5 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/240 of 20 February L 48 12 21.2.2020 2020 ►M6 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/281 of 27 February L 59 13 28.2.2020 2020 ►M7 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/384 of 6 March 2020 L 72 5 9.3.2020 ►M8 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/406 of 16 March 2020 L 80 8 17.3.2020 ►M9 Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/454 of 27 March 2020 L 95 8 30.3.2020 ►M10 Commission Implementing
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Kampung Improvement Program
    PROJECT BENEFIT EVALUATION: The Case of the Kampung Improvement Program by Kuswardono B.A., City and Regional Planning Bandung Institute of Technology (1988) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER IN CITY PLANNING at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 1997 0 1997 Kuswardono All rights reserved The Author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part Signature of Author Department of Urban Studies and Planning May 22, 1997 Certified by Paul Smoke Associate Professor of Political Economy and Planning Tis Supervisor Accepted by J. Mark Schuster sociate Professor of Urban Studies and Planning Chair, Master's in City Planning Program 111CVI, -- -111-1 ., 410, - - PROJECT BENEFIT EVALUATION: The Case of The Kampung Improvement Program by Kuswardono Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 22, 1997 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master In City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract The purpose of my thesis is to develop an analytical framework for project benefit evaluation and to test it for the case of the Kampung Improvement Program. In general, project evaluation has not been well instituted in Indonesia, leading to poor feedback for future improvement of national development policies. Although the government has prepared the Guidelines for Project Benefit and Monitoring Evaluation, the performance indicators are seem excessive, redundant, and incomplete to reflect the full range of objectives of service provision.
    [Show full text]