DOCSLIB.ORG

Market Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Market Report Q1 2020 MARKET REPORT Coast Communities The Hills The Westside Hollywood Hills & Mid-City Westside - South Metro Los Angeles South Bay RESIDENTIAL SALES JAN 2020- MARCH 2020 Welcome We are proud to present to you this Market Update for First Quarter 2020. It is my sincere hope this message finds you healthy, happy and safe during this incredibly unprecedented time in our local and global history and economies. Working with an experienced professional today is, as you can imagine, more important than ever. As a local expert, entrenched in our communities - invested in the success of our shared endeavors - I am here to bring focus and clarity to any uncertainty. The enclosed data offers a snapshot of what has transpired in our markets. This is just one piece of the puzzle. Our resources and long standing relationships remain unmatched and my commitment to reaching your very unique real estate goals is unwavering. To your home and investment success! Los Angeles Q1 2020 Residential Sales COAST COMMUNITIES WESTSIDE - SOUTH Malibu ...............................6 Culver City ...........................38 Index Malibu Beach ..........................6 Inglewood ...........................40 Marina Del Rey .........................7 Ladera Heights ....................... 41 Pacific Palisades ........................8 Park Hills Heights ......................43 Santa Monica .........................10 Topanga .............................12 METRO LOS ANGELES Venice ..............................13 Atwater .............................46 Westchester ..........................15 Downtown LA ........................46 Hollywood ..........................48 THE HILLS Los Feliz .............................49 Beverly Hills ..........................18 Silver Lake - Echo Park ..................50 Beverly Hills P.O. ......................19 SOUTH BAY THE WESTSIDE El Segundo ..........................54 Beverlywood .........................22 Hawthorne ...........................55 Brentwood ...........................23 Hermosa Beach .......................56 Cheviot Hills - Rancho Park ..............24 Manhattan Beach ......................57 West LA .............................25 Palos Verdes Estates ...................58 Westwood - Century City ...............26 Playa Del Rey .........................59 Playa Vista ...........................60 HOLLYWOOD HILLS & Rancho Palos Verdes ................... 61 MID-CITY Redondo Beach .......................64 Hancock Park - Wilshire .................30 Rolling Hills Estate .....................66 Hollywood Hills East ...................32 Torrance .............................67 Sunset Strip - Hollywood Hills West .......32 West Hollywood ......................35 Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The enclosed data has been supplied by the CRMLS or The MLS™. Neither the Association nor its MLS guarantees or is in any way responsible for its accuracy. TOTAL SALES Number of properties sold and transferred ownership LOWEST SALES PRICE Least dollar amount paid for the closed sale of property within the designated city or area HIGHEST SALES PRICE Greatest dollar amount paid for the closed sale of property within the designated city or area Glossary 3 Coast Communities Los Angeles Q1 2020 Residential Sales NUMBER OF SALES AVERAGE SOLD PRICE DAYS ON MARKET Type 2019 2020 Change 2019 2020 Change 2019 2020 Change MALIBU SFR 16 23 43.8% $3,252,500 $2,250,000 -30.8% 99 106 7.2% Condo 8 7 -12.5% $807,500 $934,000 15.7% 88 85 -3.6% MALIBU BEACH SFR 8 11 37.5% $5,800,000 $5,875,000 1.3% 116 118 1.0% Condo 5 1 -80.0% $1,220,000 $1,010,000 -17.2% 86 82 -4.0% MARINA DEL REY SFR 17 18 5.9% $1,309,980 $1,697,500 29.6% 65 43 -34.3% Condo 64 54 -15.6% $920,000 $1,062,275 15.5% 52 37 -28.0% PACIFIC PALISADES SFR 33 40 21.2% $3,080,000 $3,291,250 6.9% 0 60 21.5% Condo 10 10 0.0% $1,242,500 $1,055,000 -15.1% 38 39 0.8% PALMS - MAR VISTA SFR 76 46 -39.5% $1,522,500 $1,595,000 4.8% 44 20 -55.6% Condo 16 12 -25.0% $695,750 $816,000 17.3% 52 33 -36.9% SANTA MONICA SFR 39 55 41.0% $2,213,000 $2,410,000 8.9% 67 43 -34.9% Condo 71 61 -14.1% $1,080,000 $1,020,000 -5.6% 50 39 -21.0% TOPANGA SFR 20 23 15.0% $1,140,000 $1,399,000 22.7% 59 58 -1.1% Condo 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A VENICE SFR 37 42 13.5% $2,150,000 $2,140,000 0.5% 65 46 -29.6% Condo 3 4 33.3% $1,490,000 $1,235,000 -17.1% 88 75 -14.4% WESTCHESTER SFR 53 75 44.2% $1,345,000 $1,325,000 -1.5% 50 27 -45.2% Condo 7 8 14.3% $490,000 $525,375 7.2% 32 24 23.9% 5 Malibu Malibu Beach PROPERTY SALES PRICE PROPERTY SALES PRICE 31226 Bailard Road $ 4,250,000 31666 Broad Beach Road $ 6,450,000 30966 Broad Beach Road $ 11,498,000 5795 Calpine Drive $ 4,995,000 31042 Broad Beach Road $ 8,995,000 23901 Civic Center Way $ 400,000 26524 Latigo Shore Drive $ 12,995,000 23901 Civic Center Way $ 599,500 24134 Malibu Road $ 5,975,000 23901 Civic Center Way $ 650,000 23330 Malibu Colony Road $ 19,950,000 18425 Coastline Drive $ 2,699,000 20152 Pacific Coast Highway $ 4,400,000 23443 W Copacabana Street $ 2,085,000 19216 Pacific Coast Highway $ 6,500,000 23937 De Ville Way $ 1,765,000 20450 Pacific Coast Highway $ 3,095,000 RESIDENTIAL SALES BY STREET ADDRESS STREET BY RESIDENTIAL SALES 4345 Escondido Trail $ 1,799,000 28850 Hampton Place $ 4,500,000 20828 Pacific Coast Highway $ 3,695,000 4350 Hillview Drive $ 1,275,000 20638 Pacific Coast Highway $ 1,199,000 18425 Kingsport Drive $ 2,395,000 6460 Lunita Road $ 1,320,000 4355 Ocean View Drive $ 900,000 21461 Pacific Coast Highway $ 2,395,000 6316 Paseo Canyon Drive $ 1,799,000 21442 Paseo Portola $ 2,475,000 24580 Piuma Road $ 6,995,000 28210 Rey De Copas Lane $ 949,000 3952 Ridgemont Drive $ 5,950,000 24861 Rotunda Mesa $ 2,288,000 Coast Communities 600 Schueren Road $ 3,750,000 6805 Seawatch Lane $ 1,375,000 3540 Surfwood Road $ 1,850,000 24728 Vantage Point Terrace $ 2,495,000 6579 Wandermere Road $ 2,150,000 Los Angeles Q1 2020 Residential Sales Marina Del Rey PROPERTY SALES PRICE PROPERTY SALES PRICE 13226 Admiral Avenue $ 965,000 4337 Marina City Drive $ 642,000 4415 Alla Road $ 1,195,000 4335 Marina City Dr $ 559,000 13326 Beach Avenue $ 975,000 13600 Marina Pointe Drive $ 1,225,000 3109 Carter Avenue $ 1,549,000 13600 Marina Pointe Drive $ 1,449,000 3009 Carter Avenue $ 1,575,000 13700 Marina Pointe Drive $ 740,000 6 Eastwind Street $ 2,695,000 13700 Marina Pointe Drive $ 835,000 13206 Fiji Way $ 1,075,000 13650 Marina Pointe Drive $ 4,295,000 13214 Fiji Way $ 1,012,500 13600 Marina Pointe Drive $ 1,275,000 RESIDENTIAL SALES BY STREET ADDRESS STREET BY RESIDENTIAL SALES 13229 Fiji Way $ 1,075,000 13700 Marina Pointe Drive $ 1,095,000 13243 Fiji Way $ 1,025,000 13700 Marina Pointe Drive $ 1,649,000 4215 Glencoe Avenue $ 1,199,000 13035 Mindanao Way $ 1,199,000 4141 Glencoe Avenue $ 850,000 13131 Mindanao Way $ 1,099,000 4141 Glencoe Avenue $ 949,000 13082 Mindanao Way $ 1,599,000 4080 Glencoe Avenue $ 1,099,000 13055 Mindanao Way $ 998,000 4115 Glencoe Avenue $ 1,095,000 13078 Mindanao Way $ 1,039,000 4050 Glencoe Avenue $ 775,000 13078 Mindanao Way $ 1,050,000 4050 Glencoe Avenue $ 1,293,000 6 Northstar Street $ 2,395,000 4141 Glencoe Avenue $ 850,000 3907 Ocean Front Walk $ 9,950,000 4115 Glencoe Avenue $ 1,199,000 4403 Ocean Front $ 1,895,000 Coast Communities 4080 Glencoe Avenue $ 1,129,000 5205 Ocean Front $ 2,649,000 4140 Glencoe Avenue $ 1,079,000 120 Outrigger Mall $ 3,600,000 4215 Glencoe Avenue $ 925,000 851 Oxford Avenue $ 1,295,000 4141 Glencoe Avenue $ 859,000 5105 Pacific Avenue $ 1,999,000 4730 La Villa Marina $ 919,900 33 Privateer Street $ 1,259,000 4734 La Villa Marina $ 959,000 4 Quarterdeck Street $ 1,675,000 4745 La Villa Marina $ 899,000 4338 Redwood Avenue $ 1,100,000 4751 La Villa Marina $ 949,000 4319 Redwood Avenue $ 1,149,000 24 Lighthouse Street $ 2,700,000 3422 Schooner Avenue $ 1,130,000 131 Lighthouse Mall $ 2,350,000 3024 Stanford Avenue $ 3,300,000 4335 Marina City $ 899,000 4513 Via Dolce $ 2,800,000 4314 Marina City Drive $ 650,000 14 Westwind Street $ 2,000,000 4337 Marina City Drive $ 569,950 7 Coast Communities RESIDENTIAL SALES BY STREET ADDRESS Pacific Palisades PROPERTY SALES PRICE PROPERTY SALES PRICE 15340 Albright Street $ 1,295,000 1051 Galloway Street $ 3,295,000 725 Almar Avenue $ 6,090,000 822 Galloway Street $ 3,795,000 744 Almar Avenue $ 2,800,000 1329 Goucher Street $ 5,850,000 644 Amalfi Drive $ 6,495,000 839 Las Lomas Avenue $ 1,900,000 15425 Antioch Street $ 1,379,000 914 Las Pulgas Road $ 1,899,000 1390 Avenida De Cortez $ 1,700,000 1000 Las Pulgas Road $ 1,995,000 17194 Avenida De La Herradura $ 2,095,000 16038 Miami Way $ 2,675,000 17180 Avenida De Santa Ynez $ 2,149,000 1520 Michael Lane $ 1,479,000 15021 Bestor Boulevard $ 3,495,000 1538 Michael Lane $ 1,200,000 16856 Calle De Sarah $ 3,888,000 1550 Michael Lane $ 1,275,000 1734 Chastain $ 2,995,000 1520 Monaco Drive $ 9,995,000 1403 Cuesta Linda $ 3,998,000 1330 Monument Street $ 6,800,000 16856 Edgar Street $ 1,850,000 574 Mount Holyoke Avenue $ 1,674,900 933 Enchanted Way $ 2,325,000 529 Mount Holyoke Avenue $ 3,499,000 606 Erskine Drive $ 5,250,000 517 Muskingum Place $ 1,895,000 Los Angeles Q1 2020 Residential Sales PROPERTY SALES PRICE PROPERTY SALES PRICE 1149 Napoli Drive $ 7,695,000 3609 Seahorn Drive $ 2,499,000 1275 Palisades Drive $ 1,198,000 1536 Sorrento Drive $ 5,700,000 1744 Palisades Drive $ 965,000 454 Stassi Lane $ 2,695,000 1758 Palisades Drive $ 1,049,000 14820 W Sunset $ 2,495,000 1670 Palisades Drive $ 999,000 16137 W Sunset Boulevard $ 799,990 17085 Palisades Circle $ 1,049,000
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sherman Oaks-Studio City-Toluca Lake-Cahuenga Pass Activity Log
    SHERMAN OAKS-STUDIO CITY- TOLUCA LAKE-CAHUENGA PASS Community Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACTIVITY LOG COMMUNITY MAPS COMMUNITY PLAN I. Introduction II. Function of the Community Plan III. Land Use Policies and Programs IV. Coordination Opportunities for Public Agencies V. Urban Design www.lacity.org/PLN (General Plans) A Part of the General Plans - City of Los Angeles SHERMAN OAKS-STUDIO CITY-TOLUCA LAKE-CAHUENGA PASS ACTIVITY LOG ADOPTION DATE PLAN CPC FILE NO. COUNCIL FILE NO. May 13, 1998 Sherman Oaks-Studio City-Toluca Lake-Cahuenga 95-0356 CPU 97-0704 Pass Community Plan Update Jan. 4, 1991 Ventura-Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan 85-0383 85-0926 S22 May 13, 1992 Mulholland Scenic Parkway Specific Plan 84-0323 SP 86-0945 ADOPTION DATE AMENDMENT CPC FI LE NO. COUNCIL FIL E Sept. 7, 2016 Mobility Plan 2035 Update CPC-2013-910-GPA-SPCA-MSC 15-0719 SHERMAN OAKS-STUDIO CITY- TOLUCA LAKE-CAHUENGA PASS Community Plan Chapter I INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY BACKGROUND PLAN AREA The Sherman Oaks-Studio City-Toluca Lake-Cahuenga Pass Community Plan area is located approximately 8 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, is bounded by the communities of North Hollywood, Van Nuys-North Sherman Oaks on the north, Hollywood, Universal City and a portion of the City of Burbank on the east, Encino-Tarzana on the west and Beverly Crest-Bel Air to the south. The area is comprised of five community subareas, each with its own identity, described as follows: • Cahuenga Pass is the historical transition from the highly urbanized core of the city to the rural settings identified with the San Fernando Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Plan
    VENTURA-CAHUENGA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR Specific Plan Ordinance No. 166,560 Effective February 16, 1991 Amended by Ordinance No. 171,240 Effective September 25, 1996 Amended by Ordinance No. 174,052 Effective August 18, 2001 Specific Plan Procedures Amended by Ordinance No. 173,455 TABLE OF CONTENTS MAPS Specific Plan Area Section 1. Establishment of Specific Plan Section 2. Purposes Section 3. Relationship to Other Provisions of the Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 4. Definitions Section 5. Prohibitions, Violations, Enforcement, Use Limitations and Restrictions, and Exemptions Section 6. Building Limitations Section 7. Land Use Regulations Section 8. Sign Regulations Section 9. Project Permit Compliance Section 10. Transportation Mitigation Standards and Procedures Section 11. Project Impact Assessment Fee Section 12. PIA Fee-Funded Improvements and Services Section 13. Prior Projects Permitted Section 14. Public Right-Of-Way Improvements Section 15. Plan Review Section 16. Alley Vacations Section 17. Owners Acknowledgment of Limitations Section 18. Severability Section 19. Specific Plan Exceptions Exemption Section 20. Repeal of Existing Ventura/Cahuenga Corridor Specific Plan Ordinance A Part of the General Plan - City of Los Angeles www.lacity.org/Pln (General Plans) Ventura/Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan Exhibits A-G Tarzana Section A Corbin Av B Reseda Bl Tampa Av Wilbur Av Winnetka Av Lindley Av Topanga Canyon Bl Burbank Bl Shoup Av Canoga Av Sherman Oaks Section De Soto Av Fallbrook Av Zelzah Av White Oak Av C Louise Av
    [Show full text]
  • L a County Sheriff Jim Mcdonnell Public Safety Challenges for 2018: *Crime *Counter-Terrorism *Mental Illness *Opioids *Recruitment of Officers
    L A County Sheriff Jim McDonnell Public Safety Challenges for 2018: *Crime *Counter-Terrorism *Mental Illness *Opioids *Recruitment of Officers COMMUNITY MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2017 - 7:15 PM NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL • RIVERSIDE & WOODMAN, SHERMAN OAKS Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell will be our guest speaker on Wednesday evening October 18, 2017. Many of us are very familiar with Sheriff McDonnell because he has spoken at previous Meetings as the second in command to Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton. In 2010, he left the Los Angeles Police Department to become Chief of Police in the City of Long Beach. In 2014, he was elected as Los Angeles County Sheriff. Chief McDonnell brings decades of experience and expertise to the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. He is well-respected within the community and among law enforcement agencies. McDonnell has served as President of the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs’ Association as well as California Peace Officers’ Association. He is committed to keeping our streets safe while being transparent and proactively addressing the root causes of all crimes. Learn how Chief McDonnell deals with the challenges of overseeing 18,000 employees and what is being done to solve admitted problems within the Sheriff’s Department. Chief McDonnell will also discuss the controversy over the Sheriff’s Department’s use of drones. He will explain how the Sheriff’s Department is prepared if a Las Vegas shooting were to occur in Los Angeles. How will immigration rules from Washington, D.C. impact policing in our communities? Jules Feir announces that Poquito Mas will be our Restaurant of the Month.
    [Show full text]
  • Support Docs 7D 06/15/2017
    Sherman Oaks Community Traffic Plan Sherman Oaks is a community that is geographically bound by the Santa Monica mountains on its southern boundary, and the ever-expanding San Fernando Valley on its western, northern, and eastern boundaries. Sherman Oaks is about three miles from north to south and three miles from east to west. But, Sherman Oaks has only four exit routes along its southern border to the Westside, as shown in the figure below: • San Diego Freeway; • Sepulveda Boulevard; • Woodcliff Road; and • Beverly Glen Boulevard. Only Four Exit Routes from Sherman Oaks Sherman Oaks Vision Committee 1 of 11 May 6, 2017 Sherman Oaks Community Traffic Plan Sherman Oaks was first developed in 1927 with only three canyon exit routes to the Westside – the San Diego Freeway did not exist until 1964. This lack of viable exits created a huge future problem because there are so many job opportunities on the Westside. Years ago, traffic flowing through Sherman Oaks was manageable. But, with increasing population growth more people from across the Valley started using these canyon routes to access their jobs and schools on the Westside – thus straining the capacity of these routes. As traffic became heavier, it began to overflow onto secondary streets. This caused many neighborhoods such distress that the city began limiting access to these secondary streets through turn restrictions during peak travel times. This further concentrated traffic onto already overcrowded canyon routes, many of which are substandard streets, causing gridlock. Throughout Sherman Oaks, much of our troubles stem from streets never intended for heavy traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle to Make Sacred Places in the Secular Space of Los Angeles
    ТЕМА НОМЕРА: СВЯЩЕННОЕ: ПОНЯТИЕ И ФЕНОМЕН Ivan Strenski THE STRUGGLE TO MAKE SACRED PLACES IN THE SECULAR SPACE OF LOS ANGELES Айван Стренски БОРЬБА ЗА СОЗДАНИЕ СВЯЩЕННЫХ МЕСТ ИЗ СЕКУЛЯРНОГО ПРОСТРАНСТВА ЛОС-АНДЖЕЛЕСА В статье рассматривается топография Лос-Анджелеса (США), а также анализируется природа трудностей, связанных с попыткой систематического ее исследования. Различая пространство (space) и место (place), автор констатирует, что Лос-Анджелес парадоксально не является местом, т.е. пространством организованным и радикально отличным от окружающего. В немалой степени это проявляется в отсутствии доминирующих над городским пространством религиозных сооружений, единство города обеспечивается скорее системой скоростных шоссе. В связи с этим стратегия оформления сакрального пространства религиозными институциями, с одной стороны, предполагает дробление городского, преимущественно неинтегрированного пространства на множество кластеров, и с другой – намеренно «не соответствует» духу места, в силу его отсутствия. Более того, сооружения образуют замкнутые миры, существующие на полюсе пространства, противоположном все пронизывающей сети дорог. Таким образом, в Лос-Анджелесе религиозные сообщества не осваивают, но формируют священное пространство, причем исключительно в соответствии с принятыми и формирующимися в них представлениями. Религиоведческие исследования = Researches in Religious Studies. 2017: №1 (15). M., 2017. C.9-28. 9 doi:10.23761/rrs2017-15.9-28 Los Angeles architect, Charles W. Moore, is perhaps best known for his interests in the design of gardens. His work on these carefully fashioned places led him to develop the theme of a “sense of place.” I have found much of what Moore has written particularly applicable to the arguments I shall make in this paper about the difficulties for a city like Los Angeles to establish a sense of place.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of City Planning
    DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING RECOMMENDATION REPORT City Planning Commission Case No.: CPC-2008-4604-GPA-ZC- HD-CUB-DB-SPR Date: February 28, 2013 CEQA No.: ENV-2008-3989-EIR Time: After 8:30 A.M. Incidental Cases: VTT 70805-GB Place: Van Nuys City Hall Council Chambers, Second Floor Related Cases: None 14410 Sylvan Street, Council No.: 5 - Hon. Paul Koretz; Room 201, Council Chamber 11- Hon. Bill Rosendahl Van Nuys, CA 91401 Plan Area: West Los Angeles Specific Plan: West Los Angeles Public Hearing December 5, 2012 Transportation Improvement Completed: and Mitigation Specific Plan Appeal Status: Appealable to City Council Certified NC: Westside Expiration Date: March 13, 2013 General Plan: Light Manufacturing and Multiple Approval: General Plan Amendment, Zone Public Facilities Change and Height District, Zone: M2-1-O; PF-1XL Conditional Use for Alcoholic Beverage, Density Bonus, Site Plan Applicant: Casden West LA, LLC and Review Concurrent Processing of Los Angeles County Multiple Approvals pursuant to Metropolitan Transportation 12.36 E. Authority (MTA) Representative: Howard Katz, Casden West LA, LLC PROJECT 11122 W. Pico Boulevard; 2431-2441 S. Sepulveda Boulevard, West Los Angeles, CA 90064 LOCATION: ADD AREA: 11240, 11250, 11120, 11160, 11110 W. Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90064 PROPOSED Demolition of an operational concrete plant, a building materials supply store, an d accessory PROJECT: buildings, approximately 7,000 square feet, for the development of a 785,564 square-foot, mixed-use project consisting of 638 dwelling units (71 of which will be set aside for Very Low Income Senior Housing), 160,000 square feet of retail uses, consisting of approximately 110,000 square feet of retail space and a 50,000 square-foot of grocery market, with a total of 1,795 parking spaces provided within six subterranean parking levels.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Introduction/Summary
    I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is to inform decision-makers and the general public of the potential environmental impacts resulting from the proposed development of the Bundy Village and Medical Park Project (the “proposed project”) site located at 1901, 1925, 1933 South Bundy Drive and 12333 West Olympic Boulevard within the West Los Angeles community of the City of Los Angeles. The project Applicant is Westside Medical Park, LLC, located at 1801 Century Park East, 23rd Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067. A detailed description of the proposed project is included in Section II (Project Description) of this Draft EIR. The proposed project will require certain discretionary approvals by the City of Los Angeles (the “City”) and other governmental agencies. Therefore, the proposed project is subject to environmental review requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).1 The City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning (the “Planning Department”) is the Lead Agency under CEQA for the proposed project. As described in Sections 15121 (a) and 15362 of the State CEQA Guidelines,2 an EIR is an informational document which will inform public agency decision-makers and the public of the significant environmental effects of a project, identify possible ways to minimize the significant effects, and describe reasonable alternatives to the project. The purpose of this Draft EIR, therefore, is to focus the discussion on those potential environmental effects caused by the proposed project that the Lead Agency has determined may be significant. In addition, feasible mitigation measures are recommended, when applicable, which could reduce or avoid significant environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles City Planning Department
    JOHN O’HARA TOWNHOUSE 10733-10735 ½ Ohio Avenue CHC-2015-1979-HCM ENV-2015-2185-CE Agenda packet includes 1. Final Staff Recommendation Report 2. Categorical Exemption 3. Letter from John O’Hara’s daughter, Lylie O’Hara Doughty 4. Under Consideration Staff Recommendation Report 5. Nomination Please click on each document to be directly taken to the corresponding page of the PDF. Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2015-1979-HCM ENV-2015-2185-CE HEARING DATE: August 6, 2015 Location: 10733-10735 ½ Ohio Avenue TIME: 9:00 AM Council District: 5 PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Westwood 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: West Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Westwood 90012 Legal Description: TR 7803, Block 28, Lot 14 PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the JOHN O’HARA TOWNHOUSE REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER(S): Thomas Berry 986 La Mesa Terrace Unit A Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Caribeth LLC c/o John Ketcham 626 Adelaide Drive Santa Monica,CA 90402 APPLICANT: Marlene McCampbell 10634 Holman Ave. Apt 1 Los Angeles, CA 90024 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the subject property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7. 2. Adopt the staff report and findings. MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE Director of PlanningN1907 [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager
    [Show full text]
  • 3406. Mediterranean Fruit Fly Interior Quarantine a Quarantine Is
    3406. Mediterranean Fruit Fly Interior Quarantine A quarantine is established against the following pest, its hosts, and possible carriers: (a) Pest. Mediterranean fruit fly (Continued) (b) Quarantine Area. The area under quarantine for Mediterranean fruit fly in California is: (1) In the Santa Monica area of Los Angeles County: Beginning at the intersection of Stoney Hill Road and Mt St. Marys Fire Road; then, southeasterly on Mt. St. Marys Fire Road to its intersection with an unnamed road at 34.098629 latitude and -118.487062 longitude; then, starting northeasterly along the unnamed road to its intersection with Promontory Road; then, starting southwesterly along Promontory Road to its intersection with N Sepulveda Boulevard; then, starting southeasterly along N Sepulveda Boulevard to its intersection with US Interstate 405; then, easterly along an imaginary line to the westernmost point of Savona Road; then, starting easterly along Savona Road to its intersection with Stradella Road; then, starting southerly along Stradella Road to its intersection with Portofino Place; then, northeasterly along an imaginary line to the intersection of Levico Way and Stone Canyon Road; then, starting southeasterly along Stone Canyon Road to its intersection with Vestone Way; then, starting northeasterly along Vestone Way to its intersection with Bel Air Road; then, starting southeasterly along Bel Air Road to its intersection with Sandall Lane; then, southeasterly along Sandall Lane to its easternmost point; then, northeasterly along an imaginary line
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic, Circulation, and Parking
    4.1 Traffic, Circulation, and Parking This section describes the existing transportation and parking conditions within and adjacent to the project area. A traffic report describing the potential impacts of the proposed project was prepared by Iteris in March 2010 and is included as Appendix B. This section summarizes the findings of the traffic report and discusses any necessary mitigation and residual impacts after mitigation. The study area for the traffic report prepared for the proposed project was developed in conjunction with LACMTA and the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT). A study area that included 74 study intersections, consisting of intersections along Wilshire Boulevard, as well as parallel corridors, such as Sunset Boulevard, Santa Monica Boulevard, Olympic Boulevard, Pico Boulevard, 3rd Street, 6th Street, and 8th Street, was established for the proposed project. 4.1.1 Environmental Setting The following discussion includes an overview of the transportation system within the Wilshire BRT study area. The roadway system in the study area forms a grid pattern, with arterials and collectors that generally follow a northeast-to-southwest orientation in the western portion of the study area (west of the City of Beverly Hills) and an east-to-west orientation in the eastern portion of the study area (east of the City of Beverly Hills.) Freeway Network The Santa Monica Freeway (Interstate 10 [I-10]) is a major east-west freeway that parallels Wilshire Boulevard south of the study area. The freeway is one of the busiest and carries some of the highest daily traffic volumes in the nation. Annual counts from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) indicate that the 2007 average daily traffic (ADT) on I-10 ranges from 199,000 (east of Centinela Avenue) to 323,000 (east of Vermont Avenue).
    [Show full text]
  • 1985 I405corridorstudy Techm
    IOUTHERR CALIfOAnlA ADOCIATIOn Of GOVERnmEnTJ 600 fouth Commonweolth Avenue. fuite 1000 • Lol' Angelel' • CoHfornio • 90005 • 2!3/385-1000 I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 EXISTI~G CONDITIONS AND NEEDS ANALYSIS DRAFT P-n:pared by: Special Projects Section Oepdrtment of Transportation Planning Southern California Association of Governments 600 South Commonwealth Avenue Los Angeles, California 90005 October, 1985 IOUTHERn CALIfORniA AI/oeIATlOn OF GOVERnmenTI 600 louth Commonwealth Avenue ./uite 1000 • lol' Angelel'. CaU'omio • 90005 • 213/385-1000 I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NEEDS ANALYSIS DRAFT Prepared by: Special Projects Section Department of Transportation Planning Southern California Association of Governments 600 South Commonwealth Avenue los Angeles, California 90005 October. 1985 MTA L ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared, by the following people: William R. Wells Special Projects Manager Peter Samuel Behrman Joan Jenkins TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary v I. Study Area Definition 1 II. Existing Demographic Conditions 3 III. Existing Land Use Conditions 3 IV. Existing Transportation System Conditions 3 A. LARTS Mode 1 Data 3 B. Freew~s 3 1. 1-405 3 2. Route 90 10 3. 1-10 10 C. Arterials 14 1. Sepulveda Boulevard 14 2. Bundy Drive-Centinela Avenue 18 3. Jefferson Boulevard-Overland Avenue-Westwood Boulevard- Beverly Glen Boulevard 19 D. Pub 1i c Transportat; on 26 1. Publicly Owned Systems 26 2. Privately Owned Systems 39 3. 1984 Transit Conclusions 40 V. Year 2000/2010 Forecasts 40 A. Freew~s 40 1. I-405 40 2. Route 90 41 3. 1-10 41 B. Arterials 42 1.
    [Show full text]