Enfield Poltergeist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enfield Poltergeist July August pages_SI new design masters 5/30/12 4:30 PM Page 12 [ INVESTIGATIVE FILES J OE NI CK E L L Joe Nickell, PhD, is CSI’s senior research fellow and author of such books as Inquest on the Shroud of Turin, Relics of the Christ, and Looking for a Miracle. Enfield Poltergeist n August 1977, a series of distur- A female police constable witnessed found on the stairs with one leg ex- bances that were soon characterized a chair wobble and slide but could not tended behind her in a manner that Ias a case of poltergeist phenomena determine the cause of the movement. could easily be explained as play-acting. or even demonic possession began in By the next morning, marbles and Lego She was also involved in other inci- Enfield, a northern suburb of London. toy pieces began to “zoom out of thin dents, and when on one occasion the The subject of a forthcoming movie, air and bounce off the walls.” girls were separated (with Peggy sent to the occurrences, including the actions “Janet, did you throw that?” Her a neighbor’s home), the antics contin- of an eleven-year-old girl who repeat- mother’s question began a long series of ued at both houses; moreover, when edly “levitated” above her bed, “held the witnesses’ suspicions—or outright ac- neither girl was present—for example nation spellbound” for over a year, ac- cusations—that Janet was the cause of when Playfair spent a night alone in the cording to Britain’s Daily Mail; “no ex- the trouble that centered on her. Ac- house—there were no disturbances at planation other than the paranormal cording to Guy Lyon Playfair—who, all (1980, 80). Were both girls playing has ever been convincingly put forward” with colleague Maurice Grosse, ob- tricks, or could the poltergeist be in two (Brennan 2011). served and recorded much of the phe- places at once? When Janet was in the hospital for six weeks for evaluation, some incidents occurred only at home (Playfair 1980, 69, 90, 102, 263). Still, says Playfair, The poltergeist tended to act only when it Janet was all energy, big for her age, jumping up and rushing was not being watched. Stated Grosse: around on the slightest pretext, and talking so fast that I had “It’s smarter than we are....” some difficulty at first in under- standing her. She had an impish look, and I could understand why some visitors to the house in the later months would suspect her of playing tricks. (1980, 44) Suspicious Acts Children’s Tricks nomena over their course—Janet was The events began on August 30 in the the “main focus” or “epicentre” of inci- Even Playfair himself, who chronicled Enfield home of Margaret Hodgson. dents. “She was always near when the events in his book This House is The divorced Hodgson lived there with something happened, and this in - Haunted: The True Story of a Poltergeist her four children—Peggy, thirteen; evitably led to accusations that she was (1980), had occasional doubts. After a Janet, eleven; Johnny, ten; and Billy, playing tricks, although Grosse was al- chest of drawers tipped and jammed at seven—whose names, in early accounts, ready fully convinced that she could not an angle against a wall, Playfair played were fictionalized. Two of the children, be responsible for all the incidents” his tape recorder and heard suspicious Janet and Johnny, attempted to con- (Playfair 1980, 37). creaking noises, as if someone like Janet vince their mother that their beds were Was her sister, Peggy, partly to had slipped up to the chest. “Could they unaccountably shaking. The next night blame? Although Janet was by far the have been made by her?” Playfair asked. brought mysterious knocking sounds most frequently present suspect, with “I was beginning to have my doubts and the sliding of a chest of drawers in disturbances even following her to again” (1980, 52). the girls’ room. There were more school, her older sister was also central There were reasons aplenty for sus- knockings, and soon Hodgson had a to some events. Once, for example, picion. The poltergeist, a.k.a. “The police car making a call to 284 Green when Peggy shouted, “I can’t move! Thing,” tended to act only when it was Street (Playfair 1979; 1980, 12–33). Something’s holding me!” she was not being watched. Stated Grosse: “It’s 12 Volume 36 Issue 4 | Skeptical Inquirer July August pages_SI new design masters 5/30/12 4:30 PM Page 13 smarter than we are. Look at its tim- faked the Voice, the other mysterious nated paranormally (Gregory was a ing—the moment you go out of a room happenings remained un explained (Play- British parapsychologist inclined to be- something happens. You stay in the fair 1980, 233). lieve in the paranormal), she concluded room for hours, and nothing moves. It This remained Playfair’s and Grosse’s it had turned quickly into a farcical per- knows what we’re up to” (Playfair 1980, defense even when Janet was caught at formance for investigators and reporters 53). Indeed, when Janet knew a camera trickery (Playfair 1980, 196–7) and when desiring a sensational story (Gregory was on, nothing occurred (1980, 53). In- Janet and Peggy confessed their pranking 1980; Clark 1981). credibly, Playfair and Grosse found that to reporters. The two investigators soon Even more skeptical was American the children were sometimes “motivated elicited a retraction from the girls magician Milbourne Christopher, who to add to the activity with some tricks of (1980, 218–21). Others, such as the pro- investigated briefly at the house. On one their own.” When members of the Soci- fessional ventriloquist, were not so quick occasion, when Janet claimed she was ety for Psychical Re search (SPR) made to rationalize. unable to open the bathroom door to get visits, the children’s trickery was the main Anita Gregory, who was investigat- out, Christopher stated that he could not feature of their interest, whereas, says ing for the SPR, reported on the events determine paranormal causality if he Playfair, “it did not bother us very much. in the Journal of the Society for Psychical could not see an incident. Playfair writes, We had already seen incidents with our Research. She suggested that the case “It almost seemed that the poltergeist own eyes that the children could not pos- had been overrated, describing several was out to incriminate her, by producing sibly have done deliberately” (1980, 70). episodes of behavior on the part of third-rate phenomena in the presence of (More on this presently.) Janet and Peggy that were revealing. a first-rate observer” (1980, 170). An- The incidents involving “curious Gregory concluded that the girls were other time, when Janet was sent to her whistling and barking noises coming nonpsychically responsible for many of room and the Voice manifested, Christo- from Janet’s general direction” suggest the incidents that were attributed to pher slipped upstairs to observe. He saw the extent of Playfair and Grosse’s “poltergeist” phenomena. Although she Janet quietly steal out of her room to peer credulity. In time, the entity began to thought the outbreak might have origi- down the stairs as if to make sure she was voice words, including obscenities, and although Playfair wondered if it were really Janet acting as “a brilliant ventril- oquist,” he did not think so. His faith in Janet continued even though “the Voice” refused to speak unless the girls were alone in the room with the door closed (Playfair 1980, 138, 146). More over, the credulous investigators noted that, when the growling voice occurred, “as always Janet’s lips hardly seemed to be moving” (1980, 190). Evidence of ventriloquial fakery was even taken as proof of authenticity! Ac - cord ing to Playfair, “The connection be- tween Janet and the Voice is obviously very close. There have been several oc- casions when she says something it ob- viously meant to say, and vice versa. Would she slip up like that if she was faking the whole thing?” (1980, 173). Is he kidding? Even after profes- sional ventriloquist Ray Alan visited and concluded that the girls were pro- ducing the Voice because they “obvi- ously loved all the attention they got,” Playfair and Grosse were not persuaded that the girls were faking. In fact, they Figure 1. An eleven-year-old girl is supposedly levitating during the poltergeist outbreak of 1977–79 in Enfield, England. (Forensic illustration by Joe Nickell based on a photo in This House Is Haunted, 1980.) were quick to claim that even if the girls Skeptical Inquirer | July/August 2 012 13 July August pages_SI new design masters 5/30/12 4:30 PM Page 14 not being watched. Seeing Christopher suspect tension in the household fol- best one—well applies here. Inter - clearly flustered her. Christopher would lowing the parents’ divorce—eventually viewed by the Lon don Daily Mail later conclude that the “poltergeist” was ran its course. But the question re mains: (Brennan 2011), Janet at age forty-five nothing more than the antics of “a little Is it true that Janet and the other chil- (living in Essex with her husband, a re- girl who wanted to cause trouble and dren really could not have caused cer- tired milkman) ad mitted that she and who was very, very, clever” (1984–85, tain disturbances, as Grosse and Play- her sister had faked some of the phe- 161). fair insisted? Let us look at just one nomena. “I’d say 2 percent,” she admit- Paranormal investigator Melvin instructive incident.
Recommended publications
  • The Enf Ield 'Poltergeist' This Morning's Revisit of the Classic Case Provokes Further Thoughts
    The Enf ield 'Poltergeist' This Morning's revisit of the classic case provokes further thoughts AT THE BEGINNING OF FEBRUARY, I appeared on This Morning to talk highly resistant to disbelieving witnesses. Playfair himself wrote that"... about the Enfield 'poltergeist' with Guy Lyon Playfair (writer of This paranormal events only took place in the presence of people who House is Haunted) and Janet Winter. The producers were very pleased believed them to be possible"3 In fact, it's hard to avoid wondering that they had an appearance by the woman who had been the eleven- whether the agents of the peculiar occurrences at Enfield were simply year-old at the centre of the events in the late 70s, but were extremely refusing to play to tough crowds. concerned about her resilience and sought an assurance from me that In her piece, Ms. Barrington makes the point that "Janet has consis- I could keep it generalised and unconfrontational, which I was happy to tently resisted the fame and fortune that would certainly come her way do. When I met Janet in the Green Room, I have to say I found her if she were now to claim that she had faked all her phenomena." While extremely likeable and every bit as nervous as I had been warned. She true, that carries the implicit assumption that fame and fortune are the has previously been quite publicity-averse and, fair enough, most peo- objects of Janet's desire. Having been a witness to her demeanour at a ple would find going on the telly very nerve-wracking indeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Static and Slime in Poltergeist
    Page 3 The Fall of the House of Meaning: Between Static and Slime in Poltergeist Murray Leeder A good portion of the writing on Poltergeist (1982) has been devoted to trying to untangle the issues of its authorship. Though the film bears a directorial credit from Tobe Hooper, there has been a persistent claim that Steven Spielberg (credited as writer and producer) informally dismissed Hooper early in the process and directed the film himself. Dennis Giles says plainly, “Tobe Hooper is the director of record, but Poltergeist is clearly controlled by Steven Spielberg,” (1) though his only evidence is the motif of white light. The most concerted analysis of the film’s authorship has been by Warren Buckland, who does a staggeringly precise formal analysis of the film against two other Spielberg films and two other Hooper films, ultimately concluding that the official story bears out: Hooper directed the film, and Spielberg took over in post­production. (2) Andrew M. Gordon, however, argues that Poltergeist deserves a place within Spielberg’s canon because so many of his trademarks are present, and because Spielberg himself has talked about it as a complementary piece for E .T.: The Extra­Terrestrial (1982). (3) A similar argument can be made on behalf of Hooper, however, with respect to certain narrative devices and even visual motifs like the perverse clown from The Funhouse (1981). Other scholars have envisioned the film as more of a contested space, caught between different authorial impulses. Tony Williams, for examples, speaks of Spielberg “oppressing any of the differences Tobe Hooper intended,” (4) which is pure speculation, though perhaps one could be forgiven to expect a different view of family life from the director of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974) than that of E.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellish Love: an Exhibition of Objects from the Swedenborg Collection
    FROM THE SWEDENBORG COLLECTION Hellish Love: an exhibition of objects from the swedenborg collection STEPHANIE BROWN | LOUISE CAMU MOLLY COLDICOTT | GREER DALE-FOULKES | MENGYANG FAN GERTRUDE GIBBONS | LYDIA GRANGER | MALVINA JANASIK SARAH KHAN | WESLEY KNOWLER | CHENYUAN LIANG BINYAO LIU | YUZU ONO | SICILY SCARLET MAXIMILIAN SCHUCH | HARALD SMART | JOHN VAUGHAN 19-23 OCTOBER 2020 Swedenborg House | Free Admission The Swedenborg Society Swedenborg House 20-21 Bloomsbury Way London WC1A 2TH in association with the Royal College of Art School of Arts & Humanities, Writing MA programme 2019/20 2020 1 HELLISH LOVE: AN EXHIBITION OF OBJECTS 2 FROM THE SWEDENBORG COLLECTION Table of Contents Introduction Sally O’Reilly..........................................................................................5 FRAGMENT OF BARK 1 A Piece of Swedenborg’s Poplar Tree Bark Gertrude Gibbons...............................9 2 Ward and Ballast Wesley Knowler..........................................................................12 3 Found Harald Smart........................................................................................15 SPIRIT PHOTOS 4 A Little Imagination Louise Camu.........................................................................17 5 Spirit Cards Molly Coldicott.................................................................................20 6 Lady Divinity Sarah Roselle Khan........................................................................22 7 When the Veil is Lifted, No One Shall Giggle in Front of the Spirit
    [Show full text]
  • LEASK-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf (1.565Mb)
    WRAITHS AND WHITE MEN: THE IMPACT OF PRIVILEGE ON PARANORMAL REALITY TELEVISION by ANTARES RUSSELL LEASK DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Texas at Arlington August, 2020 Arlington, Texas Supervising Committee: Timothy Morris, Supervising Professor Neill Matheson Timothy Richardson Copyright by Antares Russell Leask 2020 Leask iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • I thank my Supervising Committee for being patient on this journey which took much more time than expected. • I thank Dr. Tim Morris, my Supervising Professor, for always answering my emails, no matter how many years apart, with kindness and understanding. I would also like to thank his demon kitten for providing the proper haunted atmosphere at my defense. • I thank Dr. Neill Matheson for the ghostly inspiration of his Gothic Literature class and for helping me return to the program. • I thank Dr. Tim Richardson for using his class to teach us how to write a conference proposal and deliver a conference paper – knowledge I have put to good use! • I thank my high school senior English teacher, Dr. Nancy Myers. It’s probably an urban legend of my own creating that you told us “when you have a Ph.D. in English you can talk to me,” but it has been a lifetime motivating force. • I thank Dr. Susan Hekman, who told me my talent was being able to use pop culture to explain philosophy. It continues to be my superpower. • I thank Rebecca Stone Gordon for the many motivating and inspiring conversations and collaborations. • I thank Tiffany A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Secret of Fatima
    Fatima Apparitional Experiences Dr James Paul Pandarakalam An apparition may provide evidence of the authenticity of its manifestation at a physical site by offering predictions that are to be fulfilled at a later date. One of the distinctive features of the events at Fatima in Portugal in 1917 is the fulfilment in our own time of the predictions made. Ever since the occurrence of these famous visionary experiences, among observers and believers there has been an exponential interest in the third secret. Voice phenomena observed during Marian apparitions such as those at Fatima have analogies with externally controlled recurrent spontaneous psychokinetic (RSPK) activity, and visionary experiences involving RSPK or RSPK-like activity may be instances of apparitions at a physical site. The voice extinction and sensory disconnection demonstrated in the Fatima percipients could be explained as psychokinetic-like activity on the part of the apparition. True apparitional experiences prove the existence of psi-like phenomena and discarnate survival. In general, paranormal phenomena involve non-physical, physical and social events. Only physical events are accessible to scientific study. Marian apparitional experiences may be subjected to scientific analysis, but Marian apparition is beyond the scientific realm. The Fatima apparitional events inform research into post-mortem existence and offer a complementary insight into our current knowledge of the discarnate realm. Marian apparitions may be regarded as an antidote to the afflictions of the present century. Introduction Several hundreds of apparitional experiences have been claimed to have occurred in the twentieth century. Marian apparitional experiences have been reported in nearly all the continents of the world in the later half of that century.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotunda Library, Special Collections, and Archives
    Longwood University Digital Commons @ Longwood University Rotunda Library, Special Collections, and Archives Fall 10-30-1996 Rotunda - Vol 76, No 7 - Oct 30, 1996 Longwood University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.longwood.edu/rotunda Recommended Citation University, Longwood, "Rotunda - Vol 76, No 7 - Oct 30, 1996" (1996). Rotunda. Paper 737. http://digitalcommons.longwood.edu/rotunda/737 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Library, Special Collections, and Archives at Digital Commons @ Longwood University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rotunda by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Longwood University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. tCJje &otuntia Volume 76, Number 7 Longwood College -- Farmville, VA October 30,1996 Reported Rudeness To Be Corrected by Me Unit Bmrktr, Staff Writtr James has been reluctant Boyer said, "A major workers, Boyer wrote, "A very characterize our library service The Rotunda recently to approach Dr. Calvin Boyer, concern is that the staff lacks a great amount of our energy, as both quality and caring printed a copy of the SGA minutes Director of the Library, with her clear understanding of incidents resources, and work go into service." briefly mentioning students' experiences alone. She that cause problems." providing quality, caring To help provide quality concerns about rude library encourages any student who has Boyer thanked the SGA service. Given our service goals, service to the Longwood workers. With the help of the a problem to document the date, for confronting the issue. we all are concerned about why community, Boyer strongly SGA, the library's staff intend to time, the name of the librarian, Realizing how dependent some users perceive our service encourages student input.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-First Century American Ghost Hunting: a Late Modern Enchantment
    Twenty-First Century American Ghost Hunting: A Late Modern Enchantment Daniel S. Wise New Haven, CT Bachelor oF Arts, Florida State University, 2010 Master oF Arts, Florida State University, 2012 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty oF the University oF Virginia in Candidacy For the Degree oF Doctor oF Philosophy Department oF Religious Studies University oF Virginia November, 2020 Committee Members: Erik Braun Jack Hamilton Matthew S. Hedstrom Heather A. Warren Contents Acknowledgments 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 5 Chapter 2 From Spiritualism to Ghost Hunting 27 Chapter 3 Ghost Hunting and Scientism 64 Chapter 4 Ghost Hunters and Demonic Enchantment 96 Chapter 5 Ghost Hunters and Media 123 Chapter 6 Ghost Hunting and Spirituality 156 Chapter 7 Conclusion 188 Bibliography 196 Acknowledgments The journey toward competing this dissertation was longer than I had planned and sometimes bumpy. In the end, I Feel like I have a lot to be thankFul For. I received graduate student Funding From the University oF Virginia along with a travel grant that allowed me to attend a ghost hunt and a paranormal convention out oF state. The Skinner Scholarship administered by St. Paul’s Memorial Church in Charlottesville also supported me For many years. I would like to thank the members oF my committee For their support and For taking the time to comb through this dissertation. Thank you Heather Warren, Erik Braun, and Jack Hamilton. I especially want to thank my advisor Matthew Hedstrom. He accepted me on board even though I took the unconventional path oF being admitted to UVA to study Judaism and Christianity in antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • Guy Lyon Playfair HIS LIFE and WORK REMEMBERED
    THE MAGAZINE OF THE SOCIETY FOR PSYCHICAL RESEARCH THE MAGAZINE OF THE SOCIETY FOR PSYCHICAL RESEARCH Paranormawwlw.sprR.ac.uk eIssuev87 Siummeer 201 8w£5.00 Guy Lyon Playfair HIS LIFE AND WORK REMEMBERED ALSO IN THIS ISSUE PROF. CHRIS ROE H.H. PRICE THE TRINITY TABLE BYZANTINE MAGICAL DR ALEJANDRO PARRA THE WASHINGTON STATE AMULETS POLTERGEIST Summer 201 8 | Issue 87 | 1 ParanormalReview PR87 Publisher The Society for Psychical Research 1 Vernon Mews London W1 4 0RL 020 7937 8984 www.spr.ac.uk Editor Leo Ruickbie [email protected] Proof Reader David Ellis Subscriptions Paranormal Review is sent free to members of the Society for Psychical Research. It is also available to non-members for a yearly subscription of £20.00, including post and packing in the UK. Contact [email protected] Back Issues Members have access to previous editions of the Psi Researcher and Paranormal Review via the online library. Some back issues are also available for purchase at £5.00 per copy, including post and packing within the UK (outside the UK additional postage costs apply). Contact [email protected] Submissions Features, articles, letters, experiences, notices, 8 reports and reviews should be sent by email to Dr Leo Ruickbie at [email protected]. Material can also be posted to the Editor at 1 Vernon Mews, London W1 4 0RL. Please mark envelopes ‘Paranormal Review’. Full submission guidelines can be found on the SPR website at www.spr.ac.uk under ‘publications’. Note The Editor reserves the right to edit or otherwise alter any material intended for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • A Travel Writer in Brazil
    Striving for Honesty: A Travel Writer in Brazil Frances Bryson Department of English and Creative Writing University of Adelaide Thesis submitted as a Major Work (Volume One) and Exegesis (Volume Two) for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English and Creative Writing, School of Humanities, University of Adelaide, December 2016. Table of Contents: Striving for Honesty: A Travel Writer in Brazil (PhD Thesis in two volumes) Volume One Table of Contents (overall thesis) ii Table of Contents (volume one) iv Abstract vi Candidate Statement viii Acknowledgements ix Major Work: ‘In Good Faith’ Prologue 1 The North and the Northeast 15 The Central West 89 The Southeast 145 Back to the North and the Northeast 187 ii Epilogue 251 References 258 Volume Two Table of Contents (volume two) ii Abstract iv Candidate Statement vi Acknowledgements vii Exegesis: Playing God: The Travel Book and its Potential to (Re)design the World Introduction 1 Chapter One: Categories and Clues: Sending the (Right) Message 7 Chapter Two: Fictions, Fabrications and Lies: Exceptions to the Promise 23 Chapter Three: Flying the Flag: Sending (mixed) Messages 39 Chapter Four: Bruce Chatwin: Legitimate Creativity or (Re)designing the 53 World? In Conclusion 71 Works Cited 73 iii Table of Contents Volume One: Major Work In Good Faith Table of Contents: Striving for Honesty: A Travel Writer in Brazil ........................................ ii Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Paranormal Spring 2021 REL 3938 (Writing Rule 4) Prof
    Religion and the Paranormal Spring 2021 REL 3938 (Writing Rule 4) Prof. Erin Prophet • [email protected] Class Time: MWF. 7 (1:55-2:45 p.m.) Class location: MAT 103 and online via Zoom Office Hours: Mon: 12:30 pm -1:30 pm; Wed: 12:30-1:30 pm. Fri. 12:30-1:30 p.m. Location: Anderson Hall 130 or online The supernatural seems to force us toward religion, while the paranormal merely forces us to say, “I don’t know.” —Steve Volk1 Pseudoscience speaks to powerful emotional needs that science often leaves unfulfilled….Pseudoscience is embraced, it might be argued, in exact proportion as real science is misunderstood…Religions are often the state-protected nurseries of pseudoscience. —Carl Sagan2 Psi, the paranormal, and the supernatural are fundamentally linked to destructuring, change, transition, disorder, marginality, the ephemeral, fluidity, ambiguity, and blurring of boundaries. —George P. Hansen3 1 Fringe-ology 2011, p. 4 2 The Demon-Haunted World 1996, pp. 14-15. 3 The Trickster and the Paranormal 2001, 22. Syllabus: Religion and the Paranormal 2 Prof. Erin Prophet Course Overview As many as three-quarters of Americans hold at least one paranormal belief. What does this tell us about the future of religion? We will examine the paranormal as an “other” category for both religion and science. Organized religion uses it to distinguish the miraculous from unsanctioned activities like witchcraft and the occult. Science frames itself as the opposite of superstition. And yet in a “disenchanted” world, it’s important to ask why we continue to be fascinated with the paranormal, as seen in the explosion of the topic in film (horror, superheroes), television, gaming and manga.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 30 No. 12, February 7, 1985
    conservation byLouAnnSeellg ., "The walls-'that moved are «;->Large-scale .* energy—.con-,"~ would not disrupt the residents, the memo said. Engineer's reports' "made witHjjheetrock and" were servation "would solve the'pro--;- but residents continue to'com- were inconclusive. "I have been * * A long-term solution to the the against "the metal window, strips blems-„'of-,heat,' condensation, • plain.of light and noise that pass unable to ascertain any reason for deterioration of sheetrock walls in . mg. The cbndensation'from those , drafts 'from''the^'wiridowsfc.you,; through the space at the ceiling.' the movements of,, various" Champagnat Hall will be part of a windows-caused-the sheetrock jto . name •'it,V*.said-^Ta'rantino.V •"','Which"is the worst inconve­ building components as observed multi-million, dollar energy- deteriorate,?. Tarantino said. "T fc\! However, he said he is unable to ~ nience, going in there and tearing by us in -our inspection of conservation program, according Thevenergy-conservation pro-- estimate how long it will be before it apart or the noise? The choice is December "10, -1984,-". said to Anthony Tarantino, director of gram, according.to Tarantino, the new program goes into effect. theirs," Tarantino said.- Wilfred A.Rohde, a professional the physical plant. • ~; /*. i ,- -will include redesigning the win-; <- "We have two short-term'op- ,.' . According sto a memo' Taran­ engineer with Haywood and i Separations - which > were dows; and. placing- insulating tions. We can continue plastering tino sent to Vice President Ed­ Pakan Associates of Poughkeep- reported last semester are located blocks.'on the "Wtsides of the the walls and they'll open-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching the Paranormal and the Occult Spotlight on Teaching Frederick Glennon, Editor
    Spotlight on Teaching • Religious Studies News • October 2017 Teaching the Paranormal and the Occult Spotlight on Teaching Frederick Glennon, Editor The AAR Committee on Teaching and Learning sponsors Spotlight on Teaching. It appears twice each year in Religious Studies News and focuses on teaching and learning around a particular theme, concern, or setting. Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Religion Photo: Séance by William Hope, c. 1920 England. Science Museum Group. 2002-5054/10. Science Museum Group Collec�on Online. htps://collec�on.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects/co8228837. i Spotlight on Teaching • Religious Studies News • October 2017 CONTENTS Contributors iii Teaching the Paranormal and the Occult: Editor’s Introduction 1 Fred Glennon Religious Education and the Paranormal: Reflections of Discussing Anomalous Experiences in the Classrooms 4 Jack Hunter Haunting the Religious Studies Classroom 9 Richard J. Callahan, Jr. Reflecting on the Occult: Nurturing “Critical Being” through Exposure to Marginal or Controversial Ideas 14 Madeleine Castro Teaching Demonology, Possession, and Exorcism in Texas 19 Joseph Laycock Experiencing Occult/Paranormal/Spiritual Phenomena in the Classroom 23 Charles F. Emmons Teaching and Learning from the Uncertainties of Occult Phenomena 26 Darryl Caterine Resources 30 ii Teaching the Paranormal and the Occult Spotlight on Teaching • Religious Studies News • October 2017 CONTRIBUTORS Richard J. Callahan, Jr., is associate professor of religious studies at the University of Missouri. He is the author of Work and Faith in the Kentucky Coal Fields: Subject to Dust (Indiana University Press, 2008) and editor of New Territories, New Perspectives: The Religious Impact of the Louisiana Purchase (University of Missouri Press, 2008).
    [Show full text]