DOCSLIB.ORG

Product Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. Head Offices ■ Marunouchi 3-2-3 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8332, Japan Our online media Phone: 81-3-6275-6200 ■ Yokohama 3-3-1 Minatomirai, Nishi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 220-8401, Japan spectra.mhi.com www.mhi.com Issued August 2021 K060-AACS21E1-B ON LAND AT SEA Maintaining our value to society OUR PRINCIPLES by adapting to changing times and We deliver reliable and innovative solutions that make embracing the challenges facing humankind a lasting difference to customers and communities worldwide. We act with integrity and fairness, always respecting others. today, tomorrow and well into the future— We constantly strive for excellence in our operations and technology, on land and at sea, in the sky and in space, building on a wide global outlook and deep local insights. we move the world forward. IN THE SKY MHI GROUP CSR ACTION GUIDELINES TAGLINE MHI Group strives to move the world toward a more secure future. Through our technology, our business practices and our people, we: The tagline advocates that we "Move the world forward" together CARE FOR THE PLANET with our global customers and local communities toward a more We are eco-conscious, and engineer environmentally friendly sustainable future. technologies that improve sustainability and protect the Earth CREATE A MORE HARMONIOUS SOCIETY We embrace integrity and proactive participation to solve societal challenges INSPIRE THE FUTURE IN SPACE We cultivate global talent who share a vision and desire to move the world forward for generations to come 1 2 With a perspective gained from 130 years of history 1991 – and tradition on land, at sea, in the sky and in space, Supporting a Sustainable Society as a Comprehensive Infrastructure Company MHI Group has always sought high effi ciency, and as the trend toward global product fi elds are expanding on a global scale. The Group is working to develop MHI Group addresses social issues and takes on environmental conservation gains momentum and the concept of ecology becomes technologies and products that help make societies more sustainable while raising commonplace, the company’s gas turbine, eco-ship and other technologies and its profi le worldwide as a comprehensive infrastructure company. challenges for the future. SPACE: ©JAXA 1880 – 1945 Building a Transportation Infrastructure from Roots in Shipbuilding ©JAXA/NASA 2007 2009 2009 2013 MHI’s monozukuri began with the lease of Nagasaki Shipyard from the Ministry of a comprehensive manufacturer of transportation equipment. As global tensions Started launch services of H-IIA Launch Successfully launched the fi rst H-IIB Successfully launched the fi rst Started launch services of H-IIB Launch Vehicles and successfully launched the Launch Vehicle with the greatest lift international space station H-II Transfer Vehicles, in addition to H-IIA, Industry. Even as the company built Japan’s fi rst steel steamship and battleships, rose, the company entered into an age in which its technologies—more advanced fi rst H-IIA after privatization capacity in Japan Vehicle (HTV), “KOUNOTORI” with capacity to handle larger satellites it applied the technologies and knowledge cultivated in those endeavors to begin than those of most countries at that time—would be diverted to military use. production of automobiles and aircraft, thereby expanding its range of business as SKY: ©Bombardier ©Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation ©Boeing ©Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation 1884 1918 1931 1942 Founding. Leased the government-owned Built the Mitsubishi Model A Manufactured Japan’s fi rst Built the world’s largest 1996 2000 2007 2007 2015 First fl ight of the “Global Express” Delivered the fi rst mass-produced F-2 Offi cially launched the MRJ program and Shipped the fi rst main wing box Conducted the maiden fl ight of the fi rst Nagasaki Shipyard and started a shipbuilding passenger car domestically produced tank, the battleship, the MUSASHI business jet, jointly developed with Fighter commenced sales activities for the Boeing 787 MRJ fl ight test aircraft business. Type 89 medium tank Bombardier LAND: 1887 1908 1929 1939 Launched Japan’s fi rst Built the TENYO MARU, Japan’s fi rst Launched the ASAMA MARU Produced the Zero Carrier Fighter steel steamship, the large passenger liner, with a passenger ship YUGAO MARU shipbuilding industry record gross tonnage over 10,000 tons 1999 2000 2008 2009 2011 2016 Completed the Tatara Delivered a refuse incineration Implemented the world’s Started commercial operations Achieved the world’s highest Completed one of the Bridge, Japan’s longest plant with the world’s highest fi rst Integrated coal of the Hokkaido Electric Power turbine inlet temperature (1,600˚C) world’s largest fl ue gas CO2 cable-stayed bridge throughput to Singapore Gasifi cation Combined Company Tomari Nuclear Power during verifi cation test with the capture plants for enhanced 1946 – 1963 1964 – 1990 Cycle (IGCC) system Plant Reactor 3 world’s highest effi ciency J-series oil recovery in the United gas turbine States Supporting Post-war Recovery with Merging of Three Heavy Industry Companies Consumer Products Leads to Large-scale Development After the war, in accordance with national policy, MHI shifted its emphasis from In 1964, the same year Tokyo hosted the Summer Olympics, the three principal military hardware to the development and manufacture of scooters, air conditioners, heavy industry companies reunited, creating today’s form of MHI Group. Its and many other types of consumer products. In 1950, in line with the GHQ’s policy of products expanded to encompass the fi elds of land, sea and air, and included oil- dissolving large industrial groups (zaibatsu), MHI was divided into three independent drilling rigs, power plants, tankers and bridges. In addition, the successful lift-off 2009 2011 2011 2014 2017 2019 2019 companies. As a result, the scale of products grew more diverse, and the three of the H-I launch vehicle occurred during this period, and the Group’s participation Commenced operations of Completed the fi rst mass- Developed the MEGANINJA, Completed the MIHARA Completed the fi rst Commenced operations of Launched FB-80 series, companies fell into competition. However, this technology race would provide the in full-fl edged space development began. Dubai Metro, at the time the produced Type 10 tank a container-confi gured 1.5 MW Test Center, Japan’s fi rst mass-produced Type Doha Metro, one of the a next-generation electric foundation for the leading company in heavy industry. world’s longest automated gas engine power generation comprehensive railway 16 mobile combat world’s largest fully forklift with formidable unmanned rail system, in system that can begin transportation system vehicle automated unmanned rail operability by a feeling of Dubai, UAE generating power within test facility equipped with a systems, in Qatar unity with the operator 24 hours of delivery circular railway test track 1970 1978 1946 1968 Started operations of the First fl ight of the MU-300 1989 Shifted to consumer products Completed the fi rst domestically PWR nuclear power plant business jet Delivered the world’s deepest after the war and built the iconic produced 500 MW supercritical at Kansai Electric Power diving submersible research 1997 2002 2003 2004 2006 2014 2015 1983 Completed the world’s fi rst Developed the world’s fastest Developed the Developed the world’s fi rst high- Developed and sold Developed and sold Introduced a high-effi ciency “Silver Pigeon” scooter pressure boiler, Chubu Electric Mihama Unit 1 Delivered the fi rst vehicle, the SHINKAI 6500 dry-cut gear cutting system, (90,000 copies/hr) newspaper “wakamaru” precision four-dimensional the world’s fi rst mass- ABLASER, a laser centrifugal chiller adopting low Power Chita Thermal Power Station Moss spherical tank 1986 which uses no cutting oil off set press communication radiation therapy system production machine for micromachining system GWP refrigerant Unit 3 (1,700 t/h) type LNG carrier Successfully robot bonding wafers at room equipped with proprietary (GWP: Global Warming Potential) launched the fi rst temperature high-precision optical H-I Launch Vehicle heads SEA: 1963 1968 First fl ight of the MU-2 Built Japan’s fi rst container 1971 twin-engine turboprop utility ship, the HAKONE MARU Delivered the No. 1 Fertilizer aircraft Plant to Iraq 1985 1990 Delivered the world’s largest Completed Japan’s largest 1975 combined cycle power plant, luxury cruise ship, the 1970 Successfully Tohoku Electric Power CRYSTAL HARMONY 2000 2005 2011 2014 Opened the Shonan Delivered the destroyer, Constructed the deep-sea drilling Completed development of the Delivered TACHIBANA-MARU, the launched the fi rst Higashi Niigata Plant Unit 3, Monorail, Japan’s ASHIGARA vessel, CHIKYU, capable of drilling up “SAYAENDO” new-generation LNG fi rst cargo-passenger ship equipped N-I Launch Vehicle No. 2 Series (545 MW) fi rst suspended to 7,000 m below the seabed carrier with a tandem-hybrid contra-rotating monorail system propeller system 3 for commuter use 4 ENERGY SYSTEMS ENERGY SYSTEMS / NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS MITSUBISHI POWER, LTD. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES COMPRESSOR CORPORATION Thermal Power Systems Compressors 1 2 3 4 22 23 24 25 NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS 5 6 7 8 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. TURBODEN S.P.A. Nuclear Energy Systems 9 10 11 26 27 28 29 30 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES MARINE MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. Marine Machinery ©ITER Organization, 12 13 14 15 16 31 32 http://www.iter.org 33 34 35 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AERO ENGINES, LTD. Aero Engines Right: High Temperature Gas-Cooled Courtesy of JAPANESE Courtesy of JAPANESE Reactors AERO ENGINES CORPORATION 17 ©Rolls-Royce plc 2016 18 AERO ENGINES CORPORATION 19 2025 21 36 Left: Hydrogen Production Unit 37 38 39 ENERGY SYSTEMS 22. Cracked Gas Compressors and Steam Turbines for Ethylene Plant 23.
Recommended publications
  • Progress in Delivering the British Army's Armoured

    Progress in Delivering the British Army's Armoured

    AVF0014 Written evidence submitted by Nicholas Drummond “Progress in Delivering the British Army’s Armoured Vehicle Capability.” Nicholas Drummond Defence Industry Consultant and Commentator Aura Consulting Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________________ _________ Contents Section 1 - Introduction Section 2 - HCDC questions 1. Does the Army have a clear understanding of how it will employ its armoured vehicles in future operations? 2. Given the delays to its programmes, will the Army be able to field the Strike Brigades and an armoured division as envisaged by the 2015 SDSR? 3. How much has the Army spent on procuring armoured vehicles over the last 20 years? How many vehicles has it procured with this funding? 4. What other capabilities has the Army sacrificed in order to fund overruns in its core armoured vehicles programmes? 5. How flexible can the Army be in adapting its current armoured vehicle plans to the results of the Integrated Review? 6. By 2025 will the Army be able to match the potential threat posed by peer adversaries? 7. Is the Army still confident that the Warrior CSP can deliver an effective vehicle capability for the foreseeable future? 8. To what extent does poor contractor performance explain the delays to the Warrior and Ajax programmes? 9. Should the UK have a land vehicles industrial strategy, and if so what benefits would this bring? 10. What sovereign capability for the design and production of armoured vehicles does the UK retain? 11. Does it make sense to upgrade the Challenger 2 when newer, more capable vehicles may be available from our NATO allies? 12. What other key gaps are emerging within the Army’s armoured vehicle capability? 13.
  • 4 R.A.N. SHIPS OVERSEAS to JUNE 194 0 URING the First Ten Months Of

    4 R.A.N. SHIPS OVERSEAS to JUNE 194 0 URING the First Ten Months Of

    CHAPTER 4 R.A.N. SHIPS OVERSEAS TO JUNE 194 0 URING the first ten months of the war, those Australian ships not D retained on the home station were employed in Imperial dispositions in widely separated areas . The first six months found Perth in Central American waters, mainly engaged in the dual task of protecting trade — especially the important tanker traffic in the Caribbean—and preventin g the escape of German merchant ships sheltering in neutral ports of th e islands and the Isthmus . Last of the three expansion-program cruiser s acquired from Britain, she had commissioned at Portsmouth on the 29th June 1939 as H .M.A. Ship under "Fighting Freddie " Farncomb, a studious , coolly-efficient officer whose nickname, bestowed during the war, reflected the confidence and esteem of the lower deck . Perth sailed from Portsmouth on the 26th July for Australia via th e Panama Canal, and reached New York, where she represented Australi a at the World Fair, on the 4th August. On the 21st of the month, after twelve days of American hospitality, she arrived at Kingston, Jamaica, an d was to have sailed for Panama on the 23rd, but in the early morning o f that date Farncomb received a signal sent to the Admiralty by the Com- mander-in-Chief, America and West Indies—Vice-Admiral Meyrick' — asking that Perth might remain on the station . Farncomb thereupon can- celled his sailing arrangements, thus anticipating an Admiralty signa l received later in the day directing him to "return Kingston and awai t further orders " .
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957

    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957

    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 San Francisco, California * Passenger Lists of Vessels Arriving at San Francisco, CA, 1893-1953. M1410. 429 rolls. Boll Contents 1 May 1, 1893, CITY OF PUBLA-February 7, 1896, GAELIC 2 March 4, 1896, AUSTRALIA-October 2, 1898, SAN BLAS 3 October 26, 1898, ACAPULAN-October 1, 1899, INVERCAULA 4 November 1, 1899, CITY OF PUBLA-October 31, 1900, CURACAO 5 October 31, 1900, CURACAO-December 23, 1901, CITY OF PUEBLO 6 December 23, 1901, CITY OF PUEBLO-December 8, 1902, SIERRA 7 December 11, 1902, ACAPULCO-June 8, 1903, KOREA 8 June 8, 1903, KOREA-October 26, 1903, RAMSES 9 October 28, 1903, PERU-November 25, 1903, HONG KONG MARU 10 November 25, 1903, HONG KONG MARU-April 25, 1904, SONOMA 11 May 2, 1904, MELANOPE-August 31, 1904, ACAPULCO 12 August 3, 1904, LINDFIELD-December 17, 1904, MONGOLIA 13 December 17, 1904, MONGOLIA-May 24, 1905, MONGOLIA 14 May 25, 1905, CITY OF PANAMA-October 23, 1905, SIBERIA 15 October 23, 1905, SIBERIA-January 31, 1906, CHINA 16 January 31, 1906, CHINA-May 5, 1906, SAN JUAN 17 May 7, 1906, DORIC-September 2, 1906, ACAPULCO 18 September 2, 1906, ACAPULCO-November 8, 1906, KOREA Roll Contents Roll Contents 19 November 8, 1906, KOREA-Feburay 26, 1907, 56 April 11, 1912, TENYO MARU-May 28, 1912, CITY MONGOLIA OF SYDNEY 20 March 3, 1907, CURACAO-June 7, 1907, COPTIC 57 May 28, 1912, CITY OF SYDNEY-July 11, 1912, 21 May 11, 1907, COPTIC-August 31, 1907, SONOMA MANUKA 22 September 1, 1907, MELVILLE DOLLAR-October 58 July 11, 1912, MANUKA-August
  • Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System

    Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System

    TRADE STUDIES TOWARDS AN AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Engineering by Gordon P. Briggs B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. (Astron) School of Engineering and Information Technology, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy January 2010 Abstract During the project Apollo moon landings of the mid 1970s the United States of America was the pre-eminent space faring nation followed closely by only the USSR. Since that time many other nations have realised the potential of spaceflight not only for immediate financial gain in areas such as communications and earth observation but also in the strategic areas of scientific discovery, industrial development and national prestige. Australia on the other hand has resolutely refused to participate by instituting its own space program. Successive Australian governments have preferred to obtain any required space hardware or services by purchasing off-the-shelf from foreign suppliers. This policy or attitude is a matter of frustration to those sections of the Australian technical community who believe that the nation should be participating in space technology. In particular the provision of an indigenous launch vehicle that would guarantee the nation independent access to the space frontier. It would therefore appear that any launch vehicle development in Australia will be left to non- government organisations to at least define the requirements for such a vehicle and to initiate development of long-lead items for such a project. It is therefore the aim of this thesis to attempt to define some of the requirements for a nascent Australian indigenous launch vehicle system.
  • Corporate Profile

    Corporate Profile

    2013 : Epsilon Launch Vehicle 2009 : International Space Station 1997 : M-V Launch Vehicle 1955 : The First Launched Pencil Rocket Corporate Profile Looking Ahead to Future Progress IHI Aerospace (IA) is carrying out the development, manufacture, and sales of rocket projectiles, and has been contributing in a big way to the indigenous space development in Japan. We started research on rocket projectiles in 1953. Now we have become a leading comprehensive manufacturer carrying out development and manufacture of rocket projectiles in Japan, and are active in a large number of fields such as rockets for scientific observation, rockets for launching practical satellites, and defense-related systems, etc. In the space science field, we cooperate with the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) to develop and manufacture various types of observational rockets named K (Kappa), L (Lambda), and S (Sounding), and the M (Mu) rockets. With the M rockets, we have contributed to the launch of many scientific satellites. In 2013, efforts resulted in the successful launch of an Epsilon Rocket prototype, a next-generation solid rocket which inherited the 2 technologies of all the aforementioned rockets. In the practical satellite booster rocket field, We cooperates with the JAXA and has responsibilities in the solid propellant field including rocket boosters, upper-stage motors in development of the N, H-I, H-II, and H-IIA H-IIB rockets. We have also achieved excellent results in development of rockets for material experiments and recovery systems, as well as the development of equipment for use in a space environment or experimentation. In the defense field, we have developed and manufactured a variety of rocket systems and rocket motors for guided missiles, playing an important role in Japanese defense.
  • 5.0 Launch Vehicle Performance

    5.0 Launch Vehicle Performance

    Final Design Report on Converting the Minuteman Missile into a Small Satellite Launch System Submitted to Dr. George W. Botbyl USRA Design Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering The University of Texas at Austin by The Minotaur Design Team Rodrick McHaty - Team Leader Rodolfo Gonzalez - Chief Engineer Vu Pham - Chief Administrative Officer Engineers: Gordon MacKay Greg Humble Bill Alexander November 24, 1993 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY m Introduction Due to the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) treaty between the United States and Ex-Soviet Union, 450 Stage III Minuteman II (MMII) missiles were -q recently taken out of service. Minotaur Designs Incorporated (MDI) intends to StagelI convert the MMII ballistic missile from a "" nuclear" warhead carrier into a small- "] L__________ satellite launcher. MDI will perform this conversion by acquiring the Minuteman Stage I stages, purchasing currently available control wafers, and designing a new ] shroud and interfaces for the satellite. Figure 1. MDI missile MDI is also responsible for properly integrating all systems. The new MDI system still System Description incorporates the original range-safety raceway and attitude-control actuators. MDI plans to purchase the 52 inch Figure 1 shows a representation of diameter avionics, range-safety, and the MDI missile. The stages that MDI attitude-control wafers from Martin will acquire from the Air Force are the Marietta's Multi-Service Launch System MMII stage I and II, and the MMIII stage (MSLS), "D" configuration missile, III. These stages define the propulsion which is currently under development. system of the MDI missile, and an MDI has designed a mechanical analysis of attainable orbits is performed.
  • Small Satellite Access to ESPA Standard Service

    Small Satellite Access to ESPA Standard Service

    SSC10-IX-1 Small Satellite Access to ESPA Standard Service Mr. Ted Marrujo DoD Space Test Program (STP), Mission Design 3548 Aberdeen Ave. SE, Kirtland AFB NM 87117; (505) 853-3338 Ted. [email protected] Lt Jake Mathis Space and Missile Systems Center, Launch and Range Systems Wing, Engineering 483 N. Aviation Blvd, Los Angeles AFB, CA; (310) 653-3392 [email protected] Mr. Caleb C. Weiss United Launch Alliance, Mission Integration 12257 S. Wadsworth Blvd, TSB-B7140, Littleton, CO 80125; (303) 977-0843 [email protected] ABSTRACT The DoD Space Test Program (STP), the Air Force Launch and Range Systems Wing (LRSW), and United Launch Alliance (ULA) are teaming up to provide a rideshare service to small satellites (<400lb) using an Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Secondary Payload Adapter (ESPA). This rideshare service is an opportunity on EELV missions with margin to carry auxiliary payloads (APLs). This paper will define the ESPA, the standard rideshare service provided to APLs, and how APLs can access this service. We will discuss the roles and responsibilities the different government organizations, ULA, and the small satellite provider have in accessing and implementing ESPA Standard Service. In brief, ULA builds the EELV and performs the launch service, LRSW is responsible for developing and acquiring EELVs from ULA, and STP is responsible for identifying and manifesting APLs that meet ESPA Standard Service requirements. We will further define the processes and procedures required to implement ESPA Standard Service to include: how a particular EELV mission is selected to host ESPA Standard Service, the selection process for auxiliary satellites to utilize the capability, the requirements and timelines small satellites must meet to qualify, and the scope of services provided by ULA as part of Standard Service.
  • MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL

    MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL

    MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 THE GLOBAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY: JAPAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Saadia M. Pekkanen Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 [email protected] I am grateful to Marco Caceres, Senior Analyst and Director of Space Studies, Teal Group Corporation; Mark Coleman, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (CPIA), Johns Hopkins University; and Takashi Ishii, General Manager, Space Division, The Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies (SJAC), Tokyo, for providing basic information concerning launch vehicles. I also thank Richard Samuels and Robert Pekkanen for their encouragement and comments. Finally, I thank Kartik Raj for his excellent research assistance. Financial suppport for the Japan portion of this project was provided graciously through a Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Harvard Academy of International and Area Studies. MIT Japan Program Working Paper Series 01.10 Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E38-7th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-252-1483 Fax: 617-258-7432 Date of Publication: July 16, 2001 © MIT Japan Program Introduction Japan has been seriously attempting to break into the commercial space launch vehicles industry since at least the mid 1970s. Yet very little is known about this story, and about the politics and perceptions that are continuing to drive Japanese efforts despite many outright failures in the indigenization of the industry. This story, therefore, is important not just because of the widespread economic and technological merits of the space launch vehicles sector which are considerable. It is also important because it speaks directly to the ongoing debates about the Japanese developmental state and, contrary to the new wisdom in light of Japan's recession, the continuation of its high technology policy as a whole.
  • Jthomas-CO2-Conferen

    Jthomas-CO2-Conferen

    KM CDR Process™ Post-combustion CO2 Capture Technology 26th Annual CO2 Conference December 8, 2020 © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. Presentation Outline 1. Introduction to MHI 2. MHI’s KM CDR Process™ Carbon Capture Technology 3. Recent Highlights © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. 2 Introduction to MHI © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. 3 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Group at a Glance As a global leader in engineering and manufacturing, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group delivers innovative and integrated solutions across a wide range of industries from commercial aviation and transportation to power plants and gas turbines, and from machinery and infrastructure to integrated defense and space systems. COMPANY HIGHLIGHTS More than $36.7BN 52% Annual revenue 24,600 Sales outside Japan Patents 400+ $1BN 82,728 Domestic & overseas Profit Employees worldwide companies (FY2019 Results @110JPY/$) © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. 4 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Group Domains MHI GROUP DOMAINS POWER INDUSTRY & AIRCRAFT, SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE DEFENSE & SPACE • Thermal Power Systems • Material Handling Equipment • Commercial Aircraft • Nuclear Energy Systems • Engine & Energy • Mitsubishi SpaceJet • Offshore Wind Power Systems • Turbochargers • Defense Aircraft • Pumps • Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration • Missile Systems • Marine Machinery • Machine Tool • Space Systems • Compressors • Automotive Thermal Systems • Special
  • Vendre Aux Donneurs D'ordres Aéronautiques

    Vendre Aux Donneurs D'ordres Aéronautiques

    VENDRE AUX DONNEURS D’ORDRES AÉRONAUTIQUES JAPONAIS Rencontrez sans vous déplacer les acheteurs japonais Positionnez-vous sur le marché aéronautique le plus important, internationalisé et expérimenté en Asie et proposez en visioconférence vos solutions innovantes à des acteurs incontournables du marché aéronautique japonais : Kawasaki Heavy Industries, IHI, Subaru Aerospace, NIPPI, JAPAN AEROSPACE Donneurs d’ordres participants : KAWASAKI Heavy Industries, IHI, SUBARU Aerospace Company, NIPPI, JAPAN AEROSPACE Rendez-vous en visioconférence sur sélection Entre mi-novembre et fin décembre 2020 Portée par Business France, les Chambres de Commerce et d’Industrie, et Bpifrance, Team France Export concentre les meilleures solutions du public et du privé pour faciliter et accélérer votre développement à l’international. À chaque étape de votre projet export, vous bénéficiez des leviers adaptés à votre stratégie, à vos ambitions et à vos moyens. Cet évènement vous est proposé dans le cadre du programme annuel France Export soutenu par l’État. FOCUS MARCHÉ ➢ La taille du marché de l’aérospatial au Japon s'élève à 18 Mds EUR. ➢ Le pays est par ailleurs un importateur net de l’UE avec environ 1,87 Mds EUR par an d’équipements achetés auprès des avionneurs et fournisseurs européens. Ce chiffre coïncide avec la volonté implicite du secteur à réduire sa dépendance vis- à-vis des donneurs d’ordres américains. ➢ La filière japonaise, notamment via ses donneurs d’ordres dits « heavy industries » (Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Subaru, IHI), se place comme un fournisseur de rang 1 majeur et partenaire associé au risque de Boeing. Elle fournit par exemple 35% du Boeing 787 et 21% du futur 777X.
  • Excerpts from the Japan Country Reader

    Excerpts from the Japan Country Reader

    Excerpts from the Japan Country Reader (The complete Reader, more than 1300 pages in length, is available for purchase by contacting [email protected].) JAPAN COUNTRY READER TABLE O CONTENTS on Carroll Bliss, Jr. 1924-1926 Commercial Attach*, Tokyo Cecil B. ,yon 1933 Third Secretary, Tokyo .a/ 0aldo Bishop 1931-1932 ,anguage Training, Tokyo 1932 3ice Consul, Osaka 1938-1941 Political Officer, Tokyo 7lrich A. Straus 1936-1940 Childhood, Japan 1946-1910 8-2 Intelligence Officer, 7nited States .ilitary, Japan .arshall 8reen 1939-1941 Secretary to Ambassador, Tokyo 1942 Japanese ,anguage School, Berkeley, California Niles 0. Bond 1940-1942 Consular Officer, Yokohama Robert A. Fearey 1941-1942 Private Secretary to the 7.S. Ambassador, Tokyo Cliff Forster 1941-1943 Japanese Internment, Philippines Ray .arshall 1941-1946 Naval Occupying Forces, Japan Christopher A. Phillips 1941-1946 7.S. Army = Staff of 8eneral .acArthur, Tokyo Eileen R. onovan 1941-1948 Education Officer, Civil Information and Education, Tokyo 1948-1910 Japan-Korea esk Officer, 0ashington, C Abraham .. Sirkin 1946-1948 Chief of News ivision, 8eneral .acArthurAs BeadCuarters, Tokyo Boward .eyers 1946-1949 ,egal Assistant to 8eneral 0illoughby, Tokyo Benry 8osho 1946-1910 Japan esk, 7SIS, 0ashington, C 0illiam E. Butchinson 1946-1911 Staff of 8eneral .acArthur, Tokyo 1912-1914 Information Officer, 7SIS, Tokyo John R. ODBrien 1946-1948 Press Analyst, Civil Information and Education, Japan 1948-1911 Public Affairs Information Officer, 7SIS, Tokyo Kathryn Clark-Bourne 1942-1910 .ilitary Intelligence, Tokyo Richard A. Ericson, Jr. 1942-1910 Consular Officer, Yokohama 1910-1912 Economic Officer, Tokyo 1913 Japanese ,anguage Training, Tokyo 1914-1918 Economic Officer, Tokyo Richard B.
  • Fearey, Robert A

    Fearey, Robert A

    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project ROBERT A. FEAREY Interviewed by: Self Initial interview date: 1991 Copyright 1998 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in New York Harvard University Entered the Foreign Service in 1942 Tokyo, Japan; Private Secretary to US Ambassador 1941-1942 Ambassador Joseph C. Grew Embassy Staff Environment Duties Proposal for Roosevelt-Konoye Talks 1941 Japan-China issue Problem of venue Washington does not approve meeting proposal US demands to Japan re China US embargo and economic pressure Japan attacks Pearl Harbor 12/9/1941 Japanese “War Declaration” Note Contents describing relationship and obligations Burning of codes and papers Embassy operations during internment 1941-1942 Food and supplies rationing Local employees Sports Environment Doolittle raid Grew’s report of Konoyo talks proposal 1942 Japan’s obligations and commitments 1 US and Allies commitments Future of Manchuria Departure aboard the Asama Maru and Gripsholm 1942 Voyage to New York Welcome home 1942 Grew’s meeting with Secretary of State Hull 1942 Hull’s reaction to Grew’s Konoyo Talks Report Search for “lost” Talks Report 1970s/1980s Grew’s “Pearl Harbor: From the Perspective of Ten Years 1952 Turbulent Era – Volume II The Road to Pearl Harbor , by Herbert Feis Fearey’s conclusions re Konoye’s proposed meeting with Roosevelt US should have agreed to the meeting It could have produced agreement Grew’s views Prince Fumimaro Konoye’s views Possible Roosevelt views re inevitability of war with Germany Tokyo; Special Assistant to Political Advisor to General MacArthur 1945 Report: “Trial and Punishment of Japanese War Criminals” Arrest of Japanese designated “war criminals” Arrest and suicide of Konoye Konoye’s final message Addendum; Letter from Ambassador Joseph C.