DOCSLIB.ORG

Family, Unvalued Discrimination, Denial, and the Fate of Binational Same-Sex Couples Under U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Family, Unvalued Discrimination, Denial, and the Fate of Binational Same-Sex Couples Under U.S Family, Unvalued Discrimination, Denial, and the Fate of Binational Same-Sex Couples under U.S. Law Copyright © 2006 Human Rights Watch/Immigration Equality All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-336-6 Cover photos: © 2006 Private Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Immigration Equality 350 West 31st Street, Suite 505 New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 (212) 714-2904 Fax +1 (212) 714-2973 E-mail: [email protected] www.immigrationequality.org Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: 1-(212) 290-4700, Fax: 1-(212) 736-1300 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel:1-(202) 612-4321, Fax:1-(202) 612-4333 [email protected] 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road London N1 9HF, UK Tel: 44 20 7713 1995, Fax: 44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] Rue Van Campenhout 15, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: 32 (2) 732-2009, Fax: 32 (2) 732-0471 [email protected] 9 rue Cornavin 1201 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 04 81, Fax: +41 22 738 17 91 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel. +49 30 259 306 10, Fax. +49 30 259 306 29 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. IMMIGRATION EQUALITY Immigration Equality is a national organization that works to end immigration discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and HIV-positive people. Immigration Equality provides legal services, information, and support to immigrants, activists, attorneys, and legislators. We help win asylum in the United States for those persecuted in their home country because of their sexual orientation, transgender identity, or HIV-status. Through education, outreach, advocacy, and the maintenance of a nationwide network of resources, we fight for those who are threatened by persecution or the discriminatory impact of immigration law. Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. Our reputation for timely, reliable disclosures has made us an essential source of information for those concerned with human rights. We address the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law, and a vigorous civil society; we document and denounce murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, discrimination, and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Our goal is to hold governments accountable if they transgress the rights of their people. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Europe and Central Asia division (then known as Helsinki Watch). Today, it also includes divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe and Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa. In addition, it includes three thematic divisions on arms, children’s rights, and women’s rights. It maintains offices in Berlin, Brussels, Geneva, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, New York, San Francisco, Tashkent, Toronto, and Washington. Human Rights Watch is an independent, nongovernmental organization, supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations worldwide. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly. The staff includes Kenneth Roth, Executive Director; Michele Alexander, Development and Outreach Director; Carroll Bogert, Associate Director; Peggy Hicks, Global Advocacy Director; Iain Levine, Program Director; Dinah PoKempner, General Counsel; Aisling Reidy, Senior Legal Advisor; James Ross, Senior Legal Advisor; Joe Saunders, Deputy Program Director; and Wilder Tayler, Legal and Policy Director. The division directors of Human Rights Watch are Brad Adams, Asia; Joseph Amon, HIV/AIDS and Human Rights; Peter Bouckaert, Emergencies; Bruni Burres, International Film Festival; Holly Cartner, Europe and Central Asia; Richard Dicker, International Justice; Jamie Fellner, United States; Bill Frelick, Refugees; Arvind Ganesan, Business and Human Rights; Steve Goose, Arms; LaShawn R. Jefferson, Women’s Rights; Scott Long, Lesbian, Gay Bisexual and Transgender Rights; Joanne Mariner, Terrorism and Counterterrorism; Peter Takirambudde, Africa; José Miguel Vivanco, Americas; Lois Whitman, Children’s Rights; and Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East and North Africa. The advocacy directors of Human Rights Watch are Steve Crawshaw, London; Loubna Freih, Geneva; Marianne Heuwagen, Berlin; Lotte Leicht, Brussels; and Tom Malinowski, Washington, DC. The members of the board of directors are Jane Olson, Chair; James F. Hoge, Jr., Vice-Chair; Sid Sheinberg, Vice-Chair; John J. Studzinski, Vice-Chair; Omar Amanat, Lloyd Axworthy, David Brown, Jorge Castaneda, Dorothy Cullman, Edith Everett, Jonathan Fanton (Chair 1998-2003), Michael Gellert, Richard Goldstone, Vartan Gregorian, Wendy Keys, Robert Kissane, Bruce Klatsky, Joanne Leedom- Ackerman, Josh Mailman, Susan Manilow, Kati Marton, Linda Mason, Barry Meyer, Joel Motley, Samuel K. Murumba, Catherine Powell, Sigrid Rausing, Victoria Riskin, Kevin Ryan, Domna Stanton, John Taylor, and Shibley Telhami. Emeritus board members are Roland Algrant, Lisa Anderson, Robert L. Bernstein (Founding Chair 1978-1997), William D. Carmichael, Adrian W. DeWind, Alice H. Henkin, Stephen L. Kass, Marina Pinto Kaufman, Peter Osnos, Kathleen Peratis, Bruce Rabb (Secretary), Orville Schell, Gary Sick, and Malcolm B. Smith. Acknowledgements This report was written by Scott Long, director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Rights Program of Human Rights Watch; Jessica Stern, researcher in the LGBT Rights Program of Human Rights Watch; and Adam Francoeur, program coordinator of Immigration Equality. Jessica Stern conducted the bulk of the interviews with assistance from Adam Francoeur and Scott Long. The report is based on research conducted between 2003 and 2006. Immigration Equality surveyed binational same-sex couples via questionnaire between March 2003 and November 2004; they received approximately 900 responses that laid the groundwork for future documentation and conceptual development. In late 2004, Human Rights Watch and Immigration Equality formally decided to collaborate on this report. Human Rights Watch and Immigration Equality conducted interviews via telephone and in-person around the United States between October 2004 and January 2006 with thirty-three binational same-sex couples. Sixteen were lesbian-identified, fifteen were gay-identified, and two had one partner who was transgender. In addition to the range of countries represented among the 900 survey respondents, the non-citizen partners among the couples interviewed were from: Argentina, Australia, the Bahamas, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Jamaica, the Netherlands, Rwanda, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Numerous people in the U.S. and in exile around the world who cannot be named for reasons of security participated in this research in invaluable ways. We give our deep thanks to the many couples and individuals we worked with on this report. At Human Rights Watch, this report was edited by Joe Saunders, deputy program director; Dinah Pokempner, general counsel; Alison Parker, senior researcher in the U.S. Program; and Jamie Fellner, director of the U.S. Program. We are grateful to our colleagues for the advice they gave us: Rebecca Schleifer, researcher in the HIV/AIDS Program; Joe Amon, director of the HIV/AIDS Program; and William Frelick, director of Refugee Policy. Andrea Holley, manager of Outreach and Public Education, provided endless support with all aspects of production. We give our deep thanks to Jessica Robertson, intern in the LGBT Rights Program, who provided critical research assistance and beyond. Lance Lattig, media editor, provided communications advice. Liba Beyer, associate director, Development and Outreach, was instrumental in developing outreach and advocacy strategies. Human Rights Watch expresses its gratitude to Henry van Ameringen, Alvin H. Baum, the David Bohnett Foundation, the David Geffen Foundation, the Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation the Gill Foundation, James C. Hormel and Timothy Wu, the Pomegranate Foundation, Ann B. Snitow, Jeanne and Joseph Sullivan, the Tides Foundation, and Reid Williams for their ongoing support of its work on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people’s rights. Immigration Equality thanks its entire office along with former staff and interns. Specifically, we thank Lavi Soloway, Jennifer Higgins, Pradeep Singla, April Herms, and Heather Betz for their advice, encouragement and work with same-sex binational couples and LGBT and HIV-positive immigrants. We also thank former interns Tara Polansky, Fadi Hanna, and Aaron Morris for their contributions to drafts of this report. We give our deep thanks to Rachel B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Drowning on Dry Land: Rethinking Mexican Migration Policy from a Human Rights Perspective
    DROWNING ON DRY LAND: RETHINKING MEXICAN MIGRATION POLICY FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE Blaine Finstein TC 660H Plan II Honors Program The University of Texas at Austin May 3, 2019 __________________________________________ Stephanie Leutert, M.A. LBJ School of Public Affairs Supervising Professor __________________________________________ Stephanie Holmsten, Ph.D. International Relations and Global Studies Second Reader ABSTRACT Author: Blaine Finstein Title: Drowning on Dry Land Supervising Professor: Stephanie Leutert, M.A. As structural issues such as organized crime and corruption deepen in Mexico, migrants are caught in the crosshairs, resulting in migratory routes rife with danger and a worsening human rights record. This paper explores how human rights practices for migrants in Mexico can be improved with respect to state policy. I begin by establishing the international and domestic law in place before moving into an assessment of the extent to which rights are guaranteed. I addresses the disconnect between legal instruments and what happens on the ground, analyzing the influence of securitization as well as social and structural factors at play against migrants in policy-making and implementation. Finally, I propose policy solutions in light of protection gaps and constraints, arguing for a non-traditional regularization of migration through Mexico that would free migratory routes from organized crime networks that pose the majority of the risk. In addition, I advocate for: the incorporation of the National Human Rights Commission into the judicial system in order to provide accountability for crimes committed against migrants, superior training of state migration workers and streamlined protocol, along with funding increases for COMAR, Mexico’s refugee agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute
    Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 20 | Issue 2 Article 12 3-1-2006 Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert Wintemute, Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah?, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 527 (2006). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl/vol20/iss2/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute∗ Attempts to amend constitutions so as to make legal1 marriage impossible for same-sex couples are futile. Amendments of this kind are nothing more than temporary “legal dikes” designed to create “legal islands” in which a heterosexual majority can continue to discriminate against a lesbian and gay minority in relation to access to legal marriage. These amendments seek to strip the gay and lesbian minority of any possibility of seeking protection against such discrimination from either the legislature or the courts. Where such amendments have been adopted, they will eventually be repealed or invalidated, because the “incoming tide,” i.e., the long-term international trend, will eventually bring full legal equality to our fellow human beings who happen to be lesbian and gay individuals, or members of same-sex couples, with or without children.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights
    83 The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights Jens M. Scherpe1 I. Introduction – It’s Been a Long Road... The legal regulation of family relationships same-sex couples in an increasing number has long been formulated around a “tradi- of jurisdictions, and in others, a form of reg- tional” notion of the family as a unit com- istered partnership is available or de facto prising a heterosexual married couple who relationships of same-sex couples are rec- conceive children within wedlock. This has ognised. But even in Europe, particularly in resulted in the protection mechanisms of the Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, there law focusing on such family units, with other are still many jurisdictions where there is no family forms such as, for example, same-sex legal recognition of same-sex relationships. couples, unmarried couples, couples who are However, in Schalk and Kopf v Austria2 the unable to conceive naturally and single par- European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ents failing to have their family relationships recognised that same-sex couples enjoy the adequately recognised and protected in law. right to “respect for family life” protected This often included, at least initially, not rec- by Article 8 of the ECHR, and this article ar- ognising “non-traditional” families’ rights to gues that this mandates some form of legal respect for their family life under Article 8 of recognition of same-sex relationships by all the Convention for the Protection of Human contracting states of the ECHR and paves Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR).
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Entitled “A White Wedding? the Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada”, Under the Supervision of Dr
    A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada by Suzanne Judith Lenon A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto © Copyright by Suzanne Judith Lenon (2008) A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Suzanne Judith Lenon Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract In A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage, I examine the inter-locking relations of power that constitute the lesbian/gay subject recognized by the Canadian nation-state as deserving of access to civil marriage. Through analysis of legal documents, Parliamentary and Senate debates, and interviews with lawyers, I argue that this lesbian/gay subject achieves intelligibility in the law by trading in on and shoring up the terms of racialized neo-liberal citizenship. I also argue that the victory of same-sex marriage is implicated in reproducing and securing a racialized Canadian national identity as well as a racialized civilizational logic, where “gay rights” are the newest manifestation of the modernity of the “West” in a post-9/11 historical context. By centring a critical race/queer conceptual framework, this research project follows the discursive practices of respectability, freedom and civility that circulate both widely and deeply in this legal struggle. I contend that in order to successfully shed its historical markers of degeneracy, the lesbian/gay subject must be constituted not as a sexed citizen but rather as a neoliberal citizen, one who is intimately tied to notions of privacy, property, autonomy and freedom of choice, and hence one who is racialized as white.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Canada (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario)
    SCC File No. 37209 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN: TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY and BRAYDEN VOLKENANT Appellants -and- THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA Respondent -and- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Intervener -and- START PROUD and OUTLAWS Proposed Intervener MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENER, START PROUD and OUTLAWS (Rules 47 and 55 of the Rules ofthe Supreme Court of Canada) GOLDBLATTPARTNERSLLP GOLDBLATTPARTNERSLLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1039 30 Metcalfe Street, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M5G 2C2 Ottawa, ON K1P 5L4 Marlys Edwardh Colleen Bauman Vanessa Payne Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-979-4380 Tel: 613-482-2463 Fax: 416-979-4430 Fax: 613-235-3041 2 PAUL JONATHAN SAGUIL 66 Wellington St. West TD Tower, P.O. Box 1 Toronto ON MSK 1A2 Paul Jonathan Saguil Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-308-1719 MARTIN+ ASSOCIATES 863 Hamilton Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2R7 Frances Mahon Email: [email protected] Tel: 604-682-4200 Agent for the Proposed Intervener, Counsel for the Proposed Intervener, Start Proud and OUTlaws Start Proud and OUTlaws ORIGINAL TO: The Registrar Supreme Court of Canada 301 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON KIA OJl 3 COPIES TO: BENNETT JONES LLP BENNETT JONES LLP 3400 One First Canadian Place World Exchange Plaza P.O. Box 130 I900- 45 O'Connor Street Toronto, ON M5X IA4 Ottawa, ON KIP IA4 Robert W. Stanley Mark Jewett QC Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Ranjan Aganval Tel: 6I3-683-2328 Email: [email protected] Fax: 6I3-683-2323 Tel: 4I6-863-I200 Fax: 4I6-863-I2I6 KUHNLLP IOO- 32I60 S Fraser Way Abbotsford, BC V2T I W5 Kevin L.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Dissertation in Public Health by Worby Who Now Works with the MI
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Jornalero: the life and work of Latin American Day Laborers in Berkeley, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5dw3q0kc Author Ordonez, Juan Thomas Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Jornalero: the life and work of Latin American Day Laborers in Berkeley, California By Juan Thomas Ordonez A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the University of California, San Francisco in Medical Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nancy Scheper-Hughes, Chair Professor Beatriz Manz Professor Philippe Bourgois Spring 2010 Jornalero: the life and work of Latin American Day Laborers in Berkeley, California © 2010 by Juan Thomas Ordonez Abstract Jornalero: the life and work of Latin American Day Laborers in Berkeley, California by Juan Thomas Ordonez Joint Doctor of Philosophy in Medical Anthropology with the University of California, San Francisco University of California, Berkeley Professor Nancy Scheper-Hughes, Chair This dissertation is an ethnographic exploration of the everyday life of Latin American day laborers –jornaleros- in Berkeley, California. Based on more than two years of fieldwork consisting of participant observation on the streets and neighborhoods these men inhabit, my research follows the daily experience of marginalization of two-dozen immigrants. Working informally on street hiring sites day laborers actively participate in the US economy while they are marginalized through the very nature of the work they undertake and a disjuncture between substantive forms of citizenship and formal recognition of their social status.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage
    Emory Law Journal Volume 64 Issue 6 Paper Symposium — Polygamous Unions? Charting the Contours of Marriage Law's Frontier 2015 The Evolution of Plural Parentage: Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage Stu Marvel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation Stu Marvel, The Evolution of Plural Parentage: Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage, 64 Emory L. J. 2047 (2015). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol64/iss6/9 This Articles & Essays is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARVEL GALLEYSPROOFS2 5/27/2015 2:14 PM THE EVOLUTION OF PLURAL PARENTAGE: APPLYING VULNERABILITY THEORY TO POLYGAMY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Stu Marvel∗ ABSTRACT Much of the legal debate surrounding the challenge to “traditional” heterosexual marriage has involved questions of liberty, discrimination, and equal treatment. Similar moves have now been made by advocates for polygamous marriage, indicating that polygamous families may be on track to follow in the rainbow contrails of same-sex marriage. This Article argues that such an evolution is indeed likely, but for different reasons than commonly held. Instead, it applies the emerging paradigm of vulnerability theory to a recent suite of polygamy and same-sex marriage rulings, with particular focus on the figure of the “vulnerable” child. At the same time, this Article will also consider the legal and social consequences of the mechanics of reproduction within both same-sex and polygamous families.
    [Show full text]
  • Roots & Routes, February, 2021
    Roots & Routes Vol 10, No. 2, February, 2021 Photo credit Dr. K. Ranju Rangan www.grfdt.com Roots and Routes, Vol 8, No. 13-14, July- December, 2019 1 Editor’s Note Dear Readers, Greetings! I hope that you are doing well at your respective places. COVID-19 pandemic has indeed made our lives more difficult, posing several challenges in front of us. However, the pandemic has also reminded us to become more resilient by Contents reducing the vulnerabilities of the common people. Specifically, the vulnera- GCM Reports bility of the poor migrant population has to be reduced at any cost to achieve Movie Reviews sustainable development in all the countries. Walking on the same path, GRFDT brings to you its organizational newsletter- “Roots and Routes”, for February 2021, thereby attempting to contribute positively towards the mi- Editorial Information ©GRFDT. Roots and Routes is printed, gration discourse. Newsletter has incorporated various write-ups, including designed & circulated by the GCM webinar reports and movie reviews relating to the migratory theme, GRFDT which have been published in the GRFDT’s media outreach portal- The Migration News: People on the Move. Editor Abhishek Yadav The GCM webinar report titled “Migrants, Diasporas and Sustainable Devel- opment- An Intertwined Story” has been written by Ujjwala Lakhanpal cover- Editorial Committee ing the GCM Objective 19- “Create Conditions for Migrants and Diasporas to Abhishek Yadav Fully Contribute to Sustainable Development in all Countries”. Another GCM Ani Yeremyan webinar on GCM Objective 20- “Promote Faster, Safer and Cheaper Transfer Arsala Nizami Feroz Khan of Remittances and Foster Financial Inclusion of Migrants” has been report- Gurram Srinivas ed by Inomusa Ndlovu in the report titled “Impact of COVID-19 on Global Kishlay Kirti Remittance Trends”.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Law As Constitutional Context for Same-Sex Marriage
    Private Law as Constitutional Context for Same-sex Marriage Private Law as Constitutional Context for Same-sex Marriage ROBERT LECKEY * While scholars of gay and lesbian activism have long eyed developments in Canada, the leading Canadian judgment on same-sex marriage has recently been catapulted into the field of vision of comparative constitutionalists indifferent to gay rights and matrimonial matters more generally. In his irate dissent in the case striking down a state sodomy law as unconstitutional, Scalia J of the United States Supreme Court mentions Halpern v Canada (Attorney General).1 Admittedly, he casts it in an unfavourable light, presenting it as a caution against the recklessness of taking constitutional protection of homosexuals too far.2 Still, one senses from at least the American literature that there can be no higher honour for a provincial judgment from Canada — if only in the jurisdictional sense — than such lofty acknowledgement that it exists. It seems fair, then, to scrutinise academic responses to the case for broader insights. And it will instantly be recognised that the Canadian judgment emerged against a backdrop of rapid change in the legislative and judicial treatment of same-sex couples in most Western jurisdictions. Following such scrutiny, this paper detects a lesson for comparative constitutional law in the scholarly treatment of the recognition of same-sex marriage in Canada. Its case study reveals a worrisome inclination to regard constitutional law, especially the judicial interpretation of entrenched rights, as an enterprise autonomous from a jurisdiction’s private law. Due respect accorded to calls for comparative constitutionalism to become interdisciplinary, comparatists would do well to attend,intra disciplinarily, to private law’s effects upon constitutional interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography Summer Reading and Films
    GEOGRAPHY SUMMER READING AND FILMS Here’s a list of things you can watch over the summer if you want to broaden your Geographical knowledge and interest: BBC iPlayer / Channel 4 Online are free. Netflix requires a subscription FILMS & DOCUMENTARIES BOOKS Exploring new places • Our Planet (Netflix) • Mountain (Netflix) • Simon Reeves (BBC iPlayer) - LOTS here! • Pedal the World (Netflix) • Magical Andes (Netflix) • Man vs Wild (with Indian PM) (Netflix) • Pacificum: Peru (Netflix) • Bill Nye Science Guy (Netflix) • Guatemala: Heart of the Mayan World (Netflix) • From Russia to Iran (Channel 4) • The Yorkshire Dales and Lakes (Channel4) • Our guy in India (India) Controversial topics: • Cowspiracy (meat industry) (Netflix) • Rotten (food industry) (Netflix) • Dope (Netflix) • The Ivory Game (Netflix) • The Milk System (Netflix) • Living Undocumented (Netflix) • Miss Representation (Netflix) • Most things from Louis Theroux (BBC iPlayer & Netflix) Use these links here if you want to download • Joshua – Teenager vs Superpower (Netflix) these books for free: • Unreported World (Channel 4) Factfulness - Ocean related http://ak.sbmu.ac.ir/uploads/Fact_Fullness_Hans_Rosling.pdf • Mission Blue (Netflix) • Blue (Netflix) The Almighty Dollar - • http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/1015989608.pdf Blue Planet (and various) – iPlayer • A Plastic Ocean (Netflix) A Short History of Nearly Everything Economic http://www.huzheng.org/bookstore/AShortHistoryofNearlyEveryth • Dirty Money (Netflix) ing.pdf • American Factory (Netflix) • Saving Capitalism (Netflix) • The Edge of Democracy (Netflix) • The China Hustle (Netflix) • Islands of the Future (Netflix) • Waterschool (Netflix) Tectonics • Into the Inferno (Netflix) • The Impossible (Netflix) • The Perfect Storm (Netflix) • 72 Dangerous Places to live (Netflix) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Material Culture of Migrant Life at the U.S./México Border
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2013 The aM terial Culture of Migrant Life at the U.S./México Border Consuelo Helen Cano Crow University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Crow, Consuelo Helen Cano, "The aM terial Culture of Migrant Life at the U.S./México Border" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 826. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/826 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Material Culture of Migrant Life at the U.S/México Border The Material Culture of Migrant Life at the U.S/México Border A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts-Anthropology By Consuelo H. Crow University of Washington Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology, 2010 August 2013 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________________________ Dr. William F. Limp Thesis Director _____________________________________________________ Dr. Justin Nolan Committee Member _____________________________________________________ Dr. Kirsten Erickson Committee Member ABSTRACT “The passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement should reduce illegal immigration as the Mexican economy improves." -- Immigration and Naturalization Service Memo 1994” Material culture is the aggregate of physical objects or artifacts used by or discarded by a past culture or society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lives of Undocumented Latina Migrants: an Intersectional Analysis of Gender, Nationality, and Migration Status in the United
    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Honors Program Theses Spring 2018 The Lives of Undocumented Latina Migrants: An Intersectional Analysis of Gender, Nationality, and Migration Status in the United States SaraJane Renfroe [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.rollins.edu/honors Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Social Welfare Commons Recommended Citation Renfroe, SaraJane, "The Lives of Undocumented Latina Migrants: An Intersectional Analysis of Gender, Nationality, and Migration Status in the United States" (2018). Honors Program Theses. 68. https://scholarship.rollins.edu/honors/68 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LIVES OF UNDOCUMENTED LATINA MIGRANTS: AN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER, NATIONALITY, AND MIGRATION STATUS IN THE UNITED STATES SaraJane Renfroe A Senior Honors Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements of the Honors Degree Program May 2018 Faculty Sponsor: Nolan Kline Rollins College Winter Park, Florida TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………..3 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………...6 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………..9 Intersectionality………………………………………………………………………………….17 Latinx Nationality………………………………………………………………………..18
    [Show full text]