DOCSLIB.ORG

Structure and Implications of Theories on the Origin of Lissamphibians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structure and Implications of Theories on the Origin of Lissamphibians Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates G. Arratia, M. V. H. Wilson & R. Cloutier (eds.): pp. 345-377, 4 figs., 2 tabs. © 2004 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISBN 3-89937-052-X Structure and implications of theories on the origin of lissamphibians Rainer R. SCHOCH & Andrew R. MILNER Abstract The origin of the Lissamphibia is the subject of continuing debate, and there is no current consensus. Albeit often considered a different problem, the intrarelationships of crown-lissamphibians have a strong influence on the identification of phylogenetic polarity for the lissamphibian stem, as cladistic reanalyses indicate. Regarding crown-group relationships, there is a majority view that salamanders and anurans are sister groups (Batrachia Hypothesis), supported by morphological and, more recently, molecular studies. The only competing alternative so far generated by molecular systematic analyses is the Procera Hypothesis (salamanders + caecilians). Both albanerpetontids and the stem-groups of the three extant clades contribute significantly to the structure of tree topologies by adding information that often reverses phylogenetic polarity, such as the presence of a stegokro- taphic skull and retention of separate intercentra by Eocaecilia. The major hypotheses of lissamphibian origin (temnospondyl, lepospondyl, and polyphyletic) rely on differ- ent character-sets, and true total evidence has not been reached yet. At first sight, the Temnospondyl and Lepospondyl hypotheses appear to involve diametrically opposite interpretations of character evolution, especial- ly regarding the middle ear and vertebral centrum, two character-sets often employed in the study of lissamphib- ians. Here we discuss the most important among the different sets of characters, analyze their problems and strengths, and test their distribution in the three different phylogenetic topologies. According to this test, most characters can be explained to have evolved equally parsimoniously in the lepospondyl and temnospondyl hypotheses, while the Polyphyletic Hypothesis forms a plausible alternative in only a few cases. While there is some quantitative support in the numerous absence characters (loss of bones) for the Lepospondyl Hypothesis, the evolution of the palate and dentition appears much more plausible (parsimonious) under the Temnospondyl Hypothesis. Surprisingly, vertebral characters do not favour the Lepospondyl Hypothesis, and some of them are well explained by all concepts, including polyphyly. We conclude that (i) the large number of absence characters is problematic for several reasons while most of them are invalidated by incongruent distribution, (ii) vertebral characters are not decisive at all and their proper understanding requires further studies of development, and (iii) some characters of the middle ear and palate, and dentition appear to be highly informative but are challenged by difficulties in identifying the primitive condition for salamanders. Altogether, our analysis of the palaeobiological implications of the current lissamphibian origin hypotheses favour the Temnospondyl Hypothesis, with the Salientia-Procera Hypothesis of internal relationships involving fewer unparsimonious assumptions than the Batrachia-Gymnophiona Hypothesis. We suggest that future cladistic analyses will have to deal with a thorough reanalysis of salamander ancestry, total evidence including albanerpetontids, the consideration of ontogenetic changes in morphology in the coding of many character-states, and the inclusion of additional character sources, such as ossification sequences among extant and fossil taxa. Introduction The relationships of the three extant groups of amphibians (Anura, Urodela, Apoda) to each other, and the identification of their closest Palaeozoic relatives, have been subjects of controversy over the last century. The interrelationship of the modern groups continues to be controversial because neither morphological nor molecular cladistic analyses give a consistent pattern of relationships between the frogs, salamanders, 345 The whole contribution can be Dieser Beitrag kann als purchased as PDF fi le. PDF-Datei erworben werden. Availability Verfügbarkeit von PDF-Dateien Prinzipiell sind von allen unseren Publikationen PDF- Generally all our publications are available as PDF fi les; Dateien erhältlich. Komplette Publikationen in der Regel full publications as a general rule after the printed version erst nachdem die gedruckte Version vergriffen ist. An- is out of print. If you have questions concerning particu- fragen bezüglich bestimmter Beiträge richten Sie bitte lar contributions please contact us by e-mail: per E-Mail an [email protected]. [email protected]. Die PDF-Dateien sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. The PDF fi les are protected by copyright. Ein Ausdruck der PDF-Dateien ist nur für den persönli- The PDF fi le may be printed for personal use. chen Gebrauch erlaubt. The reproduction and dissemination of the content or Die Vervielfältigung von Ausdrucken, erneutes Digitali- part of it is permitted. sieren sowie die Weitergabe von Texten und Abbildungen It is not allowed to transfer the digital personal certifi cate sind nicht gestattet. or the password to other persons. Das persönliche Zertifi kat und das Passwort dürfen nicht an Dritte weitergegeben werden. Prices Preise Books: Prices are to be found in the catalog. Bücher: Die Preise sind dem Katalog zu entnehmen. Articles in journals and single contributions or chapters Zeitschriftenbeiträge und einzelne Kapitel aus Sammel- in books: bänden bzw. Büchern: 10 EURO Grundbetrag pro Bestellung (einschließlich 10 EURO basic price per order (including the fi rst 10 der ersten 10 Seiten), pages), und and 0,50 EURO pro Seite ab der 11. Seite. 0.50 EURO per page, beginning with the 11th page. Den Umfang der Beiträge entnehmen Sie bitte den In- Page numbers are found in the contents of the publica- haltsverzeichnissen. tions. Bestellungen Orders Bestellungen sind mit dem PDF-Bestellformular oder formlos per E-Mail ([email protected]) an uns zu Use our order form for PDF fi les or send your order in- richten. Die Bezahlung ist ausschließlich per Kreditkar- formal per e-mail ([email protected]). The only ac- te möglich. Bei Verwendung unseres Bestellformulars cepted payment is by credit card. While using the order werden die Kreditkartendaten über eine gesicherte form for PDF fi les, your data will be transmitted by secure Verbindung (ssl) übermittelt. Sie können die Daten aber link (ssl). You also may send the informations informally auch formlos per E-Mail, Fax, Post oder telefonisch by e-mail, fax, phone or mail. übermitteln. Handling Abwicklung As soon as possible, depending on our business hours So bald wie möglich, aber abhängig von unseren Büro- and your order, you will receive your PDF fi le together zeiten und der gewünschten Bestellung, schicken wir with the certifi cate and password by e-mail. Ihnen die PDF-Datei(en) zusammen mit Ihrem persön- Larger PDF fi les can be downloaded from our webspace, lichen Zertifi kat und dem zugehörigem Passwort per if necessary. E-Mail. Größere Dateien bieten wir Ihnen gegebenenfalls Your invoice will be sent out by e-mail after we charged zum Herunterladen an. your credit card. Der fällige Betrag wird von Ihrer Kreditkarte abgebucht und Sie erhalten die Rechnung ebenfalls per E-Mail. To open the encrypted PDF fi les you have to install your Um die verschlüsselten PDF-Dateien öffnen zu können, personal certifi cate after your fi rst order. All PDF fi les muss bei der ersten Bestellung das passwortgeschütz- with the same certifi cate can be opened from that time te persönliches Zertifi kat installiert werden, welches on. anschließend auf dem Rechner verbleibt. Alle mit diesem Zertifi kat verschlüsselten Dateien können anschließend auf diesem Rechner geöffnet werden..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOA2.1 Caecilian Biology and Natural History.Key
    The Biology of Amphibians @ Agnes Scott College Mark Mandica Executive Director The Amphibian Foundation [email protected] 678 379 TOAD (8623) 2.1: Introduction to Caecilians Microcaecilia dermatophaga Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia There are more than 20 synapomorphies (shared characters) uniting the group Lissamphibia Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Integumen is Glandular Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Glandular Skin, with 2 main types of glands. Mucous Glands Aid in cutaneous respiration, reproduction, thermoregulation and defense. Granular Glands Secrete toxic and/or noxious compounds and aid in defense Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Pedicellate Teeth crown (dentine, with enamel covering) gum line suture (fibrous connective tissue, where tooth can break off) basal element (dentine) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Sacral Vertebrae Sacral Vertebrae Connects pelvic girdle to The spine. Amphibians have no more than one sacral vertebrae (caecilians have none) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Amphicoelus Vertebrae Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Opercular apparatus Unique to amphibians and Operculum part of the sound conducting mechanism Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Fat Bodies Surrounding Gonads Fat Bodies Insulate gonads Evolution of Amphibians † † † † Actinopterygian Coelacanth, Tetrapodomorpha †Amniota *Gerobatrachus (Ray-fin Fishes) Lungfish (stem-tetrapods) (Reptiles, Mammals)Lepospondyls † (’frogomander’) Eocaecilia GymnophionaKaraurus Caudata Triadobatrachus Anura (including Apoda Urodela Prosalirus †) Salientia Batrachia Lissamphibia
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Phylogeny of Philautus Gistel, 1848 (Anura, Rhacophoridae) in the Western Ghats of India, with Descriptions of 12 New Species
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 155, 374–444. With 66 figures Systematics and phylogeny of Philautus Gistel, 1848 (Anura, Rhacophoridae) in the Western Ghats of India, with descriptions of 12 new species S. D. BIJU1* and FRANKY BOSSUYT2 1Systematics Laboratory, Centre for Environmental Management of Degraded Ecosystems (CEMDE), School of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India 2Biology Department, Unit of Ecology & Systematics, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Received 14 July 2005; accepted for publication 12 March 2008 A taxonomic account of the genus Philautus from the Western Ghats of India is presented. All known species of this genus, their type specimens, current taxonomic status, and geographical distribution are revised, based on museum and field studies. In addition, 12 new species are described and compared with other members of the genus, especially with the name-bearing types of Indian Philautus. Diagnoses, detailed descriptions, illustrations, data on distribution, and natural history are provided for all species, and their relationships are estimated using molecular phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial data sets. No reliable observations have been made for two species, Philautus chalazodes (Günther, 1876) and Philautus flaviventris (Boulenger, 1882), since the original descriptions in the 19th century. © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 155, 374–444. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: biodiversity – biogeography – molecular phylogenetics – taxonomy. INTRODUCTION The Western Ghats, or Sahyadri Hills, is a chain of mountains that runs parallel with the west coast of The genus Philautus Gistel, 1848 assembles a group India over 1600 km from 8°15′N to 21°00′N.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Caecilian Amphibians (Gymnophiona) Based on Complete Mitochondrial Genomes and Nuclear RAG1
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33 (2004) 413–427 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of caecilian amphibians (Gymnophiona) based on complete mitochondrial genomes and nuclear RAG1 Diego San Mauroa, David J. Gowerb, Oommen V. Oommenc, Mark Wilkinsonb, Rafael Zardoyaa,* a Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biologı´a Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Jose´ Gutie´rrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain b Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK c Department of Zoology, University of Kerala, Kariavattom 695 581, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India Received 15 January 2004; revised 20 May 2004 Available online 28 July 2004 Abstract We determined the complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial (mt) genome of five individual caecilians (Amphibia: Gym- nophiona) representing five of the six recognized families: Rhinatrema bivittatum (Rhinatrematidae), Ichthyophis glutinosus (Ichthy- ophiidae), Uraeotyphlus cf. oxyurus (Uraeotyphlidae), Scolecomorphus vittatus (Scolecomorphidae), and Gegeneophis ramaswamii (Caeciliidae). The organization and size of these newly determined mitogenomes are similar to those previously reported for the cae- cilian Typhlonectes natans (Typhlonectidae), and for other vertebrates. Nucleotide sequences of the nuclear RAG1 gene were also determined for these six species of caecilians, and the salamander Mertensiella luschani atifi. RAG1 (both at the amino acid and nucleotide level) shows slower rates of evolution than almost all mt protein-coding genes (at the amino acid level). The new mt and nuclear sequences were compared with data for other amphibians and subjected to separate and combined phylogenetic analyses (Maximum Parsimony, Minimum Evolution, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Inference). All analyses strongly support the monophyly of the three amphibian Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of North American Batrachia
    ^— ^ z {/, — £ 00 ± LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN iNSTITUTlOr llinillSNI NVINOSHill^S S3 I HVd an, BRARIEs'^SMITHSONlAN^INSTITUTlON"'NOIiniliSNrNVINOSHillNs'^S3iavyai CD ' Z -• _j 2 _i llinillSNI NviNOSHims S3iav8an libraries Smithsonian institutio- r- ^ I- rr ^^ Z 03 30 NOIinillSNrNVINOSHimS I B R AR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN'iNSTITUTION S3 d VH 8 ... tn to t^ 2 v>. z , I ^ iiniiiSNi NviN0SHims'^S3idvaan libraries Smithsonian institutioi — ,r\ — tr\ "n braries Smithsonian institution NoiiniiiSNi NviNOSHims S3idV8ai '^ z ^ Z C ' — rn _ _ ^ to ± CO _ )linillSNI NVINOSHimS S3IHVMan libraries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIOI '^ BRARIEs'^SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHlllNs'^S 3 I « V d 8 — ~ - "^ CO ^ CO DiiniiiSNi NviNOSHims S3iav«an libraries Smithsonian institutici r- z I- ^ ^ Z CD .^ V ^ ^ y" /c^xff^ ^ O JJlfcr ^Ai\ J- J!/r A/Mr v-» •'SSSSStS 'sk -'- lsC< >^s\ O SS^is^v 'Sv i % </) ^. 2 * W Z </, 2 , _ lES SMITHSONIAN__ INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI_NIVINOSHllWS S3IMVdan_LIB, Oi I IT^'lI B I ES^SMITHS0NIAN"'|NSTITUTI0N NOII LSNI^'NVINOSHimS^SH dVH 8 RAR "" - r- ^ z r- 2 lES SMITHS0NIAN~INSTITUTI0N NOIiniliSNI~NVINOSHimS SBIMVyan LIB t/> ^ z, </) z ^^5"' ^. Z X LSNi NviN0SHims*^S3idvyan libraries Smithsonian institution noij «/> 5 eo = t/> ^^ z .J z _ _ . ^ B lES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3 I M Va 8 n_l-l z r- _^ 2 o z: /(^^^}>\ o '^°' iSNTNYINOSHimS S3 I aVH 8 n""LI B RAR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN-INSTITUTION,'w JES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3IHVyan_^'^ *A "• frt — */\ »• a: < NOIJ LSNI~'NVINOSHilWS S3 I W VH 8 ll'^LI B RAR I ES^SMITHSONIAN^INSTITUTION~ r- , Z r- 2 .lES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3ldVdan^LIB J *^ t/> ^ .^-TT^v.
    [Show full text]
  • Gekkotan Lizard Taxonomy
    3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 5% H 2% 4% A M A D R Y 3% 5% A GEKKOTAN LIZARD TAXONOMY 2% 4% D ARNOLD G. KLUGE V O 3% 5% L 2% 4% 26 NO.1 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 5% 2% 4% J A 3% 5% N 2% 4% U A R Y 3% 5% 2 2% 4% 0 0 1 VOL. 26 NO. 1 JANUARY, 2001 3% 5% 2% 4% INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRIBUTORS Hamadryad publishes original papers dealing with, but not necessarily restricted to, the herpetology of Asia. Re- views of books and major papers are also published. Manuscripts should be only in English and submitted in triplicate (one original and two copies, along with three cop- ies of all tables and figures), printed or typewritten on one side of the paper. Manuscripts can also be submitted as email file attachments. Papers previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere should not be submitted. Final submissions of accepted papers on disks (IBM-compatible only) are desirable. For general style, contributors are requested to examine the current issue of Hamadryad. Authors with access to publication funds are requested to pay US$ 5 or equivalent per printed page of their papers to help defray production costs. Reprints cost Rs. 2.00 or 10 US cents per page inclusive of postage charges, and should be ordered at the time the paper is accepted. Major papers exceeding four pages (double spaced typescript) should contain the following headings: Title, name and address of author (but not titles and affiliations), Abstract, Key Words (five to 10 words), Introduction, Material and Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, Literature Cited (only the references cited in the paper).
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenomic Approach to Vertebrate Phylogeny Supports a Turtle-Archosaur Affinity and a Possible Paraphyletic Lissamphibia
    A Phylogenomic Approach to Vertebrate Phylogeny Supports a Turtle-Archosaur Affinity and a Possible Paraphyletic Lissamphibia The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Fong, Jonathan J., Jeremy M. Brown, Matthew K. Fujita, and Bastien Boussau. 2012. A phylogenomic approach to vertebrate phylogeny supports a turtle-archosaur affinity and a possible paraphyletic lissamphibia. PLoS ONE 7(11): e48990. Published Version doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048990 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11731191 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A Phylogenomic Approach to Vertebrate Phylogeny Supports a Turtle-Archosaur Affinity and a Possible Paraphyletic Lissamphibia Jonathan J. Fong1,2,3*, Jeremy M. Brown2,4, Matthew K. Fujita1,2,5,6, Bastien Boussau2,7 1 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 3 College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America, 5 Museum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic
    [Show full text]
  • Iroquois National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 2011 Cover Photo Bald Eagle Steve Hillebrand/USFWS
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Iroquois National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 2011 Cover Photo Bald Eagle Steve Hillebrand/USFWS Inset Photos Wood Turtle John Mosesso/NBII Spotted Salamander USFWS Karner Blue Butterfly Joel Trick/USFWS This blue goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal Federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service manages the 150-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of more than 550 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 70 national fish hatcheries and 81 ecological services field stations. The agency enforces Federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally significant fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fishing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvanian Vertebrate Fauna
    VII PENNSYLVANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA By ROY LEE MOODIE THE PENNSYLVANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF KENTUCKY By ROY LEE MOODIE INTRODUCTION The vertebrates which one may expect to find in the Penn- sylvanian of Kentucky are the various types of fishes, enclosed in nodules embedded in shale, as well as in limestone and in coal; amphibians of many types, found heretofore in nodules and in cannel coal; and probably reptiles. A single incomplete skeleton found in Ohio, described below, seems to be a true reptile. Footprints and fragmentary skeletal elements found in Pennsylvania1 in Kansas2 in Oklahoma3, in Texas4 in Illinois5, and other regions, in rocks of late Pennsylvanian or early Permian age, and often spoken of as Permo- Carboniferous, indicate types of vertebrates, some of which may be reptiles. No skeletal remains or other evidences of Pennsylvanian vertebrates have so far been found in Kentucky, but there is no reason why they cannot confidently be expected to occur. A single printed reference points to such vertebrate remains6. As shown by the map, Kentucky lies immediately adjacent to regions where Pennsylvanian vertebrates have been found. That important discoveries may still be made is indicated by Carman's recent find7. Ohio where important discoveries of 1Case, E. C. Description of vertebrate fossils from the vicinity of Pittsburgh, Pa: Annals of the Carnegie Museum, IV, Nos. III-IV, pp. 234-241. pl. LIX, 1908. 2Williston, S. W. Some vertebrates from the Kansas Permian: Kansas Univ. Quart., ser. A, VI, No.1, pp. 53. fig., 1897. 3Case, E. C., On some vertebrate fossils from the Permian beds of Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Maddin Etal 2012
    The Braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the Origin of Caecilians The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Maddin, Hillary Catherine, Farish A. Jenkins Jr., and Jason S. Anderson. 2012. The braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the origin of caecilians. PLoS ONE 7(12): e50743. Published Version doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050743 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9969388 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP The Braincase of Eocaecilia micropodia (Lissamphibia, Gymnophiona) and the Origin of Caecilians Hillary C. Maddin1,2*, Farish A. Jenkins, Jr.1, Jason S. Anderson2 1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 2 Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Abstract The scant fossil record of caecilians has obscured the origin and evolution of this lissamphibian group. Eocaecilia micropodia from the Lower Jurassic of North America remains the only stem-group caecilian with an almost complete skull preserved. However, this taxon has been controversial, engendering re-evaluation of traits considered to be plesiomorphic for extant caecilians. Both the validity of the placement of E. micropodia as a stem caecilian and estimates of the plesiomorphic condition of extant caecilians have been questioned.
    [Show full text]
  • A Triassic Stem-Salamander from Kyrgyzstan and the Origin of Salamanders
    A Triassic stem-salamander from Kyrgyzstan and the origin of salamanders Rainer R. Schocha,1, Ralf Werneburgb, and Sebastian Voigtc aStaatliches Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany; bNaturhistorisches Museum Schloss Bertholdsburg, D-98553 Schleusingen, Germany; and cUrweltmuseum GEOSKOP/Burg Lichtenberg (Pfalz), D-66871 Thallichtenberg, Germany Edited by Neil H. Shubin, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved April 3, 2020 (received for review January 24, 2020) The origin of extant amphibians remains largely obscure, with Cretaceous in northwestern China, providing much data on the only a few early Mesozoic stem taxa known, as opposed to a much early evolution and diversification of the clade. better fossil record from the mid-Jurassic on. In recent time, an- Recently, a German team excavating in the Kyrgyz Madygen urans have been traced back to Early Triassic forms and caecilians Formation (16) recovered a second find of Triassurus that is not have been traced back to the Late Jurassic Eocaecilia, both of only larger and better preserved, but also adds significantly more which exemplify the stepwise acquisition of apomorphies. Yet data on this taxon. Reexamination of the type has revealed the most ancient stem-salamanders, known from mid-Jurassic shared apomorphic features between the two Madygen speci- rocks, shed little light on the origin of the clade. The gap between mens, some of which turned out to be stem-salamander (uro- salamanders and other lissamphibians, as well as Paleozoic tetra- pods, remains considerable. Here we report a new specimen of dele) autapomorphies. The present findings demonstrate not Triassurus sixtelae, a hitherto enigmatic tetrapod from the Middle/ only that Triassurus is a valid tetrapod taxon, but also, and more Late Triassic of Kyrgyzstan, which we identify as the geologically oldest importantly, that it forms a very basal stem-salamander, com- stem-group salamander.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Equatorial Record of Frogs from the Late Triassic of Arizona
    Palaeontology The earliest equatorial record of frogs royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsbl from the Late Triassic of Arizona Michelle R. Stocker1, Sterling J. Nesbitt1, Ben T. Kligman1,2, Daniel J. Paluh3, Adam D. Marsh2, David C. Blackburn3 and William G. Parker2 Research 1Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 2 Cite this article: Stocker MR, Nesbitt SJ, Petrified Forest National Park, 1 Park Road, Petrified Forest, AZ 86028, USA 3Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Kligman BT, Paluh DJ, Marsh AD, Blackburn DC, Parker WG. 2019 The earliest equatorial record MRS, 0000-0002-6473-8691; SJN, 0000-0002-7017-1652; BTK, 0000-0003-4400-8963; DJP, 0000-0003-3506-2669; ADM, 0000-0002-3223-8940; DCB, 0000-0002-1810-9886; of frogs from the Late Triassic of Arizona. Biol. WGP, 0000-0002-6005-7098 Lett. 15: 20180922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0922 Crown-group frogs (Anura) originated over 200 Ma according to molecular phylogenetic analyses, though only a few fossils from high latitudes chronicle the first approximately 60 Myr of frog evolution and distribution. We report fos- sils that represent both the first Late Triassic and the earliest equatorial record of Received: 29 December 2018 Salientia, the group that includes stem and crown-frogs. These small fossils con- Accepted: 1 February 2019 sist of complete and partial ilia with anteriorly directed, elongate and distally hollow iliac blades. These features of these ilia, including the lack of a prominent dorsal protuberance and a shaft that is much longer than the acetabular region, suggest a closer affinity to crown-group Anura than to Early Triassic stem anur- ans Triadobatrachus from Madagascar and Czatkobatrachus from Poland, both Subject Areas: high-latitude records.
    [Show full text]
  • SVP Comments on 21 U.S. National
    Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 9650 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20814- 3998 Phone: (301) 634-7814 Fax: (301) 634-7455 Email: [email protected] Web: www.vertpaleo.org FEIN: 06-0906643 July 9, 2017 Subject: Comments from the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology about the scientific importance of paleontological resources at the 21 U.S. National Monuments established since 1996 (Docket ID: DOI-2017-0002). Executive Summary In this document, the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology reviews the paleontological resources currently known from the U.S. National Monuments established since 1996 and explains why altering or revoking their boundaries would be disastrous for the science of paleontology. In these comments, we present: i. our views on the role of public lands in the science of paleontology (p. 2); ii. information on the benefit of paleontological science and education at these monuments to the general public (p. 4); iii. comments on why mining operations are incompatible with discovery and scientific study of paleontological resources (p. 4); iv. specific details about the paleontological resources at each of the continental monuments under review (p 6); v. a copy of the comments we submitted on May 25, 2017, about Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments (tracking number 1k1-8wld-cxoj) (Appendix 1, p. 17); vi. representative scientific publications on paleontological resources at each of the moments (Appendix 2, p. 25) We find that all 21 non-marine monuments protect scientifically important vertebrate fossils or rocks with a high potential for yielding them, and are therefore are appropriately designated under the Antiquities Act of 1906 (note: ‘fossils’ must not to be confused with ‘fossil fuels’).
    [Show full text]