DOCSLIB.ORG

A Description and Comparison of the Perceptions of NCAA Division II And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Description and Comparison of the Perceptions of NCAA Division II And Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2013 A Description and Comparison of the Perceptions of NCAA Division II and Division III College Presidents regarding the Impacts of Intercollegiate Athletics at their Institutions Aaron C. Huffman West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Huffman, Aaron C., "A Description and Comparison of the Perceptions of NCAA Division II and Division III College Presidents regarding the Impacts of Intercollegiate Athletics at their Institutions" (2013). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 566. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/566 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i A Description and Comparison of the Perceptions of NCAA Division II and Division III College Presidents regarding the Impacts of Intercollegiate Athletics at their Institutions Aaron C. Huffman Dissertation submitted to the College of Education and Human Services at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Higher Education Administration Sebastián R. Díaz, Ph.D., J.D., Chair Ernest R. Goeres, Ph.D. Paul E. Chapman, Ph.D. Jack C. Watson II, Ph.D. Gonzalo A. Bravo, Ph.D. Department of Curriculum and Instruction/Literacy Studies Morgantown, West Virginia 2013 Keywords: College President, Intercollegiate Athletics, Higher Education, National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA, Division II, Division III Copyright 2013 Aaron C. Huffman ii Abstract A Description and Comparison of the Perceptions of NCAA Division II and Division III College Presidents regarding the Impacts of Intercollegiate Athletics at their Institutions Aaron C. Huffman The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the perceptions of NCAA Division II and NCAA Division III college and university presidents regarding the impacts of intercollegiate athletics at their institutions. The data were collected with an anonymous online survey instrument developed by the researcher and sent via email using SurveyMonkey. The survey included Likert-type items that were divided into four subscales constructed from phenomena that were gleaned from the literature: (1) Financial Impact subscale, (2) Enrollment Impact subscale, (3) Marketing Impact subscale, and (4) Student Impact subscale. The survey was emailed to the entire population of all NCAA Division II and NCAA Division III college and university presidents (N=760). When data collection was complete, 323 responses (42.5%) were determined to be usable—147 NCAA Division II responses and 176 NCAA Division III responses. Four separate independent samples t-tests were used to compare the presidents’ perceptions regarding the impacts of athletics on each of the four subscales. The t-tests revealed that statistically significant differences do not exist between the two groups on the Financial Impact subscale and the Student Impact subscale, but a statistically significant difference between the two groups does exist for both the Enrollment Impact subscale (p=.014) and for the Marketing Impact subscale (p<.001). Descriptive statistics revealed that both the NCAA Division II presidents and the NCAA Division III presidents perceive that intercollegiate athletics impacts their institutions positively. The items from each subscale to which the presidents responded most strongly are also reported. Descriptive statistics also revealed that the presidents’ perceptions do not always align with the literature regarding athletics in higher education. Finally, descriptive statistics revealed that the NCAA Division III presidents’ perceptions are more divided regarding these issues than the NCAA Division II presidents. Implications for practice and future research are provided. NCAA DII AND DIII COLLEGE PRESIDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ATHLETICS iii Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my doctoral committee for all of your time and contributions to this project. Dr. Sebastián Díaz, Dr. Ernest Goeres, Dr. Paul Chapman, Dr. Jack Watson, and Dr. Gonzalo Bravo—you have been an incredible team. Each of you has contributed to this culmination in important and unique ways. I can’t imagine having a better committee. I want to especially express my gratitude to Dr. Díaz for serving as my committee chairperson and all of the guidance and expertise that you have provided throughout this whole process. You have been the “rock” of my doctoral career from start to finish—throughout the coursework, comps, prospectus, and dissertation. You have been my teacher, my mentor, and my advisor—and now my friend and colleague. Thank you for everything. I will always be grateful. Thank you, Dr. Goeres, for always being there for guidance and keeping our cohort on track through all of the transitions. Thank you, Dr. Chapman, for all of the extra help navigating the new IRB system and the general guidance and support along the way. Thank you, Dr. Watson, for your expertise, extra availability, and guidance, especially with survey design and implementation. I am very grateful for all of your extra time you spent with me. Thank you, Dr. Bravo, for your willingness to serve on my committee and the guidance and advice you have provided. I want to thank my doctoral cohort colleagues and friends—Dan Filer, Carrie White, Brad Cox, Jacob Sanwidi, and Jeff Terpstra—for all of the laughs, good times, jokes, and camaraderie. You actually made me look forward to all those trips to Morgantown! I want to thank Dr. Rhonda Noble, Dr. John McCullough, and Jim Watson from West Liberty University—thank you for all of your encouragement and support with this endeavor. I want to say a special thank you to my parents, Rad and Ruth Huffman, for always guiding, loving, and supporting me throughout my whole life. I want to thank my three children, Jacob, Jillian, and Joshua Huffman, for being my three little blessings. You mean the world to me and I love you. Finally, I want to thank my loving wife Courtney Huffman for everything you have done and sacrificed in order for this to be accomplished. Thank you for taking care of our children during this process and showering our home with your love. You are my best friend—my “other half”—my blessing. I love you! NCAA DII AND DIII COLLEGE PRESIDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ATHLETICS iv Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. xiv List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................xv Chapter One: Introduction and Statement of the Problem .............................................................1 Statement of the Problem .....................................................................................................2 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................................4 Research Questions ..............................................................................................................5 Significance of the Study .....................................................................................................6 Terms and Concepts .............................................................................................................7 Organization of the Study ..................................................................................................13 Chapter Two: Review of Literature ..............................................................................................14 NCAA Divisions ................................................................................................................14 NCAA Division I ...................................................................................................15 Division I-Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) ............................................15 Division I-Football Championship Subdivision (FCS)..............................16 Division I-No Football subdivision ...........................................................16 NCAA Division II and Division III .......................................................................16 Division II and III differences ....................................................................19 Financial differences ......................................................................21 NCAA revenue allocation differences ...........................................21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 NCAA Division I Baseball Championship Bracket
    Regionals Super Regionals Division III World Series Super Regionals Regionals May 17-19 May 24-25 May 31- June 4/5 May 24-25 May 17-19 Double Elimination Best-of-Three Games Cedar Rapids, Iowa Best-of-Three Games Double Elimination OR Best-of-five Double Elimination OR Best-of-five First-Round Pairings Best-of-Three Finals First-Round Pairings *Southern Me. (34-7) Webster (31-10) vs. vs. New England Col. (25-15) Bethany Lutheran (23-16) New England College Webster Oswego St. (29-12) Regional Champion Regional Champion *Wis.-Whitewater (34-9) vs. vs. MIT (22-17-1) North Central (IL) (31-11) Super Regional Champion Super Regional Champion *UMass Boston (29-11) *Concordia Chicago (38-6) vs. vs. Baruch (17-18) Buena Vista (24-17) *UMass Boston *Concordia Chicago Wheaton (MA) (27-10) Regional Champion Regional Champion Baldwin Wallace (25-15) vs. vs. St. Joseph's (ME) (32-10) Saint John's (MN) (32-12) Babson (33-7) *Wooster (26-12) vs. vs. Keystone (25-13) Rochester (NY) (28-15) *Babson Wooster *Trinity (CT) (26-7) Regional Champion Regional Champion CWRU (22-13) vs. vs. Salve Regina (27-16) Otterbein (26-16-1) Super Regional Champion Super Regional Champion Denison (38-7) *SUNY Cortland (31-11-1) vs. vs. La Roche (30-13) Alvernia (28-14-2) *Heidelberg SUNY Cortland Regional Champion Heidelberg (30-13) Penn St. Harrisburg (32-13-1) Regional Champion vs. vs. *Adrian (35-7) Tufts (27-8) Ithaca (31-7) vs. *Chapman (33-9) Westfield St. (27-14) *Chapman Shenandoah Whitman (26-18) Regional Champion Regional Champion *Kean (29-14) vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Balls & Strikes
    A BALLS & STRIKES NEW -11 OPTION? This lineup just got more LEGIT. FPLG11 • LEGIT™ FASTPITCH -11 ONE-YEAR WARRANTY • APPROVED BY - ASA®, USSSA®, NSA, ISA, ISF and all other associations • LENGTH / WEIGHT - 28”/17oz, 29”/18oz, 30”/19oz, 31”/20oz, 32”/21oz, 33”/22oz ©Worth Sports, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation (NYSE:JAH) 510 Maryville University Drive, Suite 110, St. Louis, MO 63141 • worthsports.com LEGIT POWER. LEGIT PERFORMANCE B BALLS & STRIKES MADE IN THE USA CREATE CUSTOM BATTING HELMETS YOUR TEAM. YOUR COLORS. YOUR STYLE. Now you can build your own custom softball batting helmets online and purchase them directly from schuttstore.com 1 BALLS & STRIKES OFFICIAL SPORTING GOODS RETAILER EVERYTHING SOFTBALL GET 5% BACK ON BATS, GLOVES, CLEATS & MORE WHEN YOU JOIN THE LEAGUE BY SPORTS AUTHORITY GET 5% BACK on all in-store merchandise when you earn 100 Points or more during a quarterly period. Sign up in store or online at sportsauthority.com/theleague SPORTSAUTHORITY.COM 2 BALLS & STRIKES THE LINEUP 5 Letter from the President Official Publication of ASA/USA Softball 8 Faces on the Field - Meet the athletes who play ASA June 2013 12 News and Notes Executive Director Contributors 16 ASA GOLD National Ron Radigonda Julie Bartel E.T. Colvin Editor Kevin Isaacson 17 USASoftball.com Steven Embree Staff Sgt. Mike Meares Design Codi Warren 20 Women's College World Series Recap Old Hat Creative 23 Softball Poem The Official Publication of 27 USA Softball Junior Women's National Team The Amateur Softball Association / USA Softball 32 Love of the Game Balls and Strikes Softball Magazine is published quarterly by the Amateur Softball Association 2801 N.E.
    [Show full text]
  • College Lacrosse Recruiting Guide
    SO… YOU WANT TO PLAY LACROSSE INCOLLEGE? H e o m n a o g r the Last Updated: March 2014 US Lacrosse | 113 W. University Parkway, Baltimore, Md. 21210 | 410.235.6882 | uslacrosse.org 1 H e o m n a o g r the Letter from US Lacrosse On behalf of US Lacrosse, it is my sincere pleasure to introduce you to our college recruiting handbook, “So...You want to play lacrosse in college?.” In recent years, college recruiters have accelerated the timeline and created recruiting formulas that are unique to them. The direction of the college lacrosse recruiting process has led to confusion by some, frustration to others and leaves everyone guessing. The intent of this handbook is to present hard facts, dispel the myths, and to promote the essentials. As a parent of two children who have been through the process and a high school coach for thirty years, I have seen the process play out in scenarios that are too many to number. From my experience there are a few points that I would like to highlight. First, everyone’s journey through the process is unique, so do not rely on others who say they know how the process works. Second, one can only control the tools that are in their own hands. Recruits and their families must educate themselves about the process and the schools of interest, prepare physically for competition, and to achieve to your potential academically. A recruit and their family have no control over the decisions that a college coach will make.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination of 2019 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Transfers
    DESTINATION OF 2019 NCAA DIVISION I MEN’S BASKETBALL TRANSFERS January 2020 Summary of Findings Although the Division I Transfer Portal opened in October 2018, there was no substantial change in the number of transfers in Division I men’s basketball from 2018 to 2019. Consistent with the past four years of transfer data, about half of men’s basketball transfers remain in Division I, while a quarter transfer to Division II and a quarter transfer out of the NCAA (NAIA, NJCAA, etc.). Fewer than 1 in 10 are “up transfers” (transferring to a more prestigious program), while about 30% are “lateral transfers” and 60% are “down transfers.” This pattern has remained consistent over time. Of those men’s basketball transfers remaining in Division I, nearly one third are so-called “graduate transfers.” This percentage has remained relatively consistent over the past four years. Graduate transfers are more likely to “up transfer” than undergraduate transfers in men’s basketball. Identifying 2019 Transfers in Division I Men’s Basketball Transfers were identified by merging the 2019 Division I Basketball Transfers list from the Verbal Commits website (downloaded Sept. 15, 2019) with all Division I men’s basketball student-athletes listed in the 2018-19 Transfer Portal. List destination accuracy was determined primarily through: The “matriculated” institution listed in the student’s status field in the Transfer Portal. 2019-20 men’s basketball roster of destination institution and/or student-athlete bio. Secondary sources: • NJCAA National Letter of Intent Signee Database. • Official press releases from either/both institution(s). • Transfer student-athletes’ Twitter feed or other social media footprint (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • 014003-00964 PROGRAM SDSU Vs Arizona Wrestling
    WRESTLING VS Sunday, November 11 DEVELOPING ATHLETES FOR 20 YEARS For the past two decades, Sanford POWER has trained and developed athletes of all ages and abilities to be better than they were yesterday. Our effective and safe methods help to improve performance and drive results for every team and every athlete. This is our story of success and it can be your story, too. Join us. Visit SanfordPOWER.com to learn more. 10/18 014004-00424 2 SANFORD PENTAGON WRESTLING #SanfordSports sanfordpentagon.com Welcome to the Sanford Sports Complex! It’s our sixth year of operation and it looks like our theme for the year will be growth. In March, the Pentagon hosted 59 postseason college basketball games. Among those were three national championships – the fi rst ever combined NCAA Division II men’s and women’s Elite Eight, as well as the NAIA Division II men’s championship. The NAIA then honored the Sanford Sports Complex with its annual Best NAIA Championship Venue Award. The award is a testament to the facility and our incredible sta that make it come to life. This spring ushered in several big announcements about new additions coming to the Complex. The Summit League announced the relocation of its headquarters to Sioux Falls, a more centralized location within the organization’s footprint. We are proud to welcome them to Sioux Falls. Will’s Training Table is undergoing an extensive remodel this year. When it reopens in February the destination restaurant and bar will have more than doubled in size. The Complex is a hub of activity, and that will only continue with the addition of a 180,000-square-foot Mills Fleet Farm store and Great Shots, a new golf entertainment facility.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-21 MANUAL NCAA General Administrative Guidelines
    2020-21 MANUAL NCAA General Administrative Guidelines Contents Section 1 • Introduction 2 Section 1•1 Definitions 2 Section 2 • Championship Core Statement 2 Section 3 • Concussion Management 3 Section 4 • Conduct 3 Section 4•1 Certification of Eligibility/Availability 3 Section 4•2 Drug Testing 4 Section 4•3 Honesty and Sportsmanship 4 Section 4•4 Misconduct/Failure to Adhere to Policies 4 Section 4•5 Sports Wagering Policy 4 Section 4•6 Student-Athlete Experience Survey 5 ™ Section 5 • Elite 90 Award 5 Section 6 • Fan Travel 5 Section 7 • Logo Policy 5 Section 8 • Research 6 Section 9 • Division I 6 Section 9•1 Religious Conflicts 6 THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 6222 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6222 317-917-6222 ncaa.org November 2020 NCAA, NCAA logo, National Collegiate Athletic Association and Elite 90 are registered marks of the Association and use in any manner is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Association. NCAA PRE-CHAMPIONSHIPS MANUAL 1 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES Section 1 • Introduction The Pre-Championship Manual will serve as a resource for institutions to prepare for the championship. This manual is divided into three sections: General Administrative Guidelines, Sport-Specific Information, and Appendixes. Sections one through eight apply to policies applicable to all 90 championships, while the remaining sections are sport specific. Section 1•1 Definitions Pre-championship Manual. Resource for institutions to prepare for the championship. Administrative Meeting. Pre-championship meeting for coaches and/or administrators. Appendixes. Any supplemental documents to be provided and distributed through the various resources. Championship Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • No Agent Rule"
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 61 Number 1 Article 1 2-1-2021 The Changing Landscape of Intercollegiate Athletics—The Need to Revisit the NCAA's "No Agent Rule" Sahl, John P. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John P. Sahl, The Changing Landscape of Intercollegiate Athletics—The Need to Revisit the NCAA's "No Agent Rule," 61 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 1 (2020). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized editor of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS—THE NEED TO REVISIT THE NCAA’S “NO AGENT RULE” John P. Sahl* The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the primary governing body for intercollegiate athletics, promulgated its “No Agent Rule” in 1974 prohibiting advisors of student-athletes from communi- cating and negotiating with professional sports teams. As part of a core principle of amateurism, the NCAA adopted this rule, in part, to deline- ate between professional athletes and student athletes. However, through economic and societal evolution, this policy is antiquated and detrimental to the personal and professional development of college ath- letes. This Article argues in favor of expanding the recent Rice Commis- sion’s recommendation, adopted by the NCAA, to grant an exception from the No Agent Rule for Men’s Division I elite basketball players to all college sports and levels of competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Icfa Three-Weapon Trophy
    \ \ \ SLL ICFA THREE-WEAPON TROPHY AFlA SPECIAL MEETING Vice Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer I Secreta ry-T reosurerl, Add itiona I Di rector )Iume 17 Number 4 A quorum was present at AAU House on and such additional members of the Ex€ April 12, 1966, and the following amend­ utive Committee as the Division shall in J1IJ1EJ1Jn;]11 f EI1CJl]B ments to the By-Laws were approved for final By-law provide, may be nominated a Official Organ of the Amoteur Fencers League of America consideration at the Annual AFLA Meeting elected in accordance with procedur Management on July 2, 1966: established by the Division in its By-low; W. L. Osborn, Publisher J. R. de Capriles, Editor 1. Amend Article VII, Section 2, by add- 5. Amend Article XIII, Section 8, by ac P.O. Box 144 41 Fish Hawk Drive, Oak Hill, ing a new paragraph to read: ing three new paragraphs to read: Terre Haute, Ind. Middletown, New Jersey 201 -671 -5872 "(B)-Vacancies in the office of Addi­ /IVocancies in any Divisional office eXCE Feature Editors: Miguel de Capriles, Claribel Sounders and Ralph Goldstein. tional Director occurring between annual Chairman or Vice Chairman occurring [ Assistant Edito<: William J. Latzko meetings of the Divisian shall be filled for tween Annual Meetings of the Divisi Advertising Office: 5 Great Oak Lone, Pleasantville, N.Y. the unexpired term by the Executive Com­ sholl be filled for the unexpired term Telephone: 867-9191 mittee of the DivIsion.1I the Executive Cammittee. Policy Board 2. Amend Article VII, Section 12, by add- f'ln the event of a vacancy occurring in t N.
    [Show full text]
  • Things to Know About Volleyball Recruiting
    THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT VOLLEYBALL RECRUITING Terms to Know NCAA Clearinghouse or Eligibility Center (eligibilitycenter.org) – is the NCAA office that certifies a student-athletes academic credentials to be eligible for Division I and II athletics. You cannot make an official visit to a DI or DII school without being at least registered with the clearinghouse. NCAA Division I – 325 Volleyball teams at some of the most well known schools (Florida, Texas, Duke, Rutgers, Seton Hall, Rider etc). Division I schools are permitted to offer scholarships to up to 12 student athletes for volleyball. Schools that are “fully funded” will only offer full scholarships. Partially funded programs will split scholarships and stack with academic and need based aid money to make you an offer. The season is August and into December, with off-season training through the spring and even summer months at many schools. This is the highest level of college athletics, and is the most demanding. NCAA Division II – 250ish Volleyball teams at lesser known schools (Felician, Georgian Court, Tampa, Lemoyne, Millersville, CW Post). Division II schools are permitted to divide the value of 8 full scholarships among a larger number of student athletes. Many DII schools only have between 1-3 scholarships, which they divide and stack with academic and need based aid, but seldom is it a full package. The season lasts from August through November, with either a limited spring training season, or they have recently approved the addition of beach volleyball as a spring sport which some schools may be adding soon. NCAA Division III – 425 Volleyball teams at a variety of schools (including NYU, Chicago, Johns Hopkins, Williams, Scranton, Kean, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirit of the Heights Thomas H. O'connor
    THE SPIRIT OF THE HEIGHTS THOMAS H. O’CONNOR university historian to An e-book published by Linden Lane Press at Boston College. THE SPIRIT OF THE HEIGHTS THOMAS H. O’CONNOR university historian Linden Lane Press at Boston College Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts Linden Lane Press at Boston College 140 Commonwealth Avenue 3 Lake Street Building Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467 617–552–4820 www.bc.edu/lindenlanepress Copyright © 2011 by The Trustees of Boston College All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage or retrieval) without the permission of the publisher. Printed in the USA ii contents preface d Thomas H. O’Connor v Dancing Under the Towers 22 Dante Revisited 23 a “Dean’s List” 23 AHANA 1 Devlin Hall 24 Alpha Sigma Nu 2 Donovan, Charles F., S.J. 25 Alumni 2 Dustbowl 25 AMDG 3 Archangel Michael 4 e Architects 4 Eagle 27 Equestrian Club 28 b Bands 5 f Bapst Library 6 Faith on Campus 29 Beanpot Tournament 7 Fine Arts 30 Bells of Gasson 7 Flutie, Doug 31 Black Talent Program 8 Flying Club 31 Boston “College” 9 Ford Tower 32 Boston College at War 9 Fulbright Awards 32 Boston College Club 10 Fulton Debating Society 33 Bourneuf House 11 Fundraising 33 Brighton Campus 11 Bronze Eagle 12 g Burns Library 13 Gasson Hall 35 Goldfish Craze 36 c Cadets 14 h Candlemas Lectures 15 Hancock House 37 Carney, Andrew 15 Heartbreak Hill 38 Cavanaugh, Frank 16 The Heights 38 Charter 17 Hockey 39 Chuckin’ Charlie 17 Houston Awards 40 Church in the 21st Century 18 Humanities Series 40 Class of 1913 18 Cocoanut Grove 19 i Commencement, First 20 Ignatius of Loyola 41 Conte Forum 20 Intown College 42 Cross & Crown 21 Irish Hall of Fame 43 iii contents Irish Room 43 r Irish Studies 44 Ratio Studiorum 62 RecPlex 63 k Red Cross Club 63 Kennedy, John Fitzgerald 45 Reservoir Land 63 Retired Faculty Association 64 l Labyrinth 46 s Law School 47 Saints in Marble 65 Lawrence Farm 47 Seal of Boston College 66 Linden Lane 48 Shaw, Joseph Coolidge, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • PRE-CHAMPIONSHIP MANUAL Table of Contents Introduction
    PRE-CHAMPIONSHIP MANUAL Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................5 NCAA Staff Contact Information ................................................................................6 Sports Committee Contact Information .......................................................................6 Regional Alignment ......................................................................................................6 Regional Advisory Committee Information ................................................................6 Important Dates ............................................................................................................9 Date Calculation Formula ............................................................................................9 Dates and Sites .............................................................................................................9 Concussion Management .............................................................................................9 Division III Philosophy ..............................................................................................10 Equipment ...................................................................................................................10 Ethical Behavior By Coaches ....................................................................................10 Religious/Commencement Conflicts Policy ..............................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Ineligible??!! How the (Hell) Did That Happen?
    A Coaches Guide to Navigating the New NCA Ineligible??!! How the (hell) did that happen? Kim Durand | University of Washington Gary Hyatt | Central Washington University Daniel Scheid | Seattle University Session Outline • Introductions • NCAA Division I and II Standards • Case Study • Other options – Two Year Colleges – Division III – NAIA • How High School Coaches Can Help • Additional Resources • Questions & Open Discussion NCAA Initial Eligibility Case Study - • Joe is being recruited by Ocean Pacific University’s Football coaches – He has completed 16 core courses with a core course GPA of 2.879 – His ACT sum was 78 – He completed 11 core courses before he started his senior year, 8 of which were in English, Math or Science – Joe is deemed a Final Non-Qualifier by the Eligibility Center….how the (hell) did that happen?!? NCAA Initial Eligibility Requirements – Division I Division I • 16 core course requirement – 4 years English – 3 years Math (Algebra 1 or higher) – 2 years Science – 1 year Additional English, Math or Science – 2 years Social Science – 4 years Additional Core NCAA Initial Eligibility Requirements – Division I Division I • Test Scores (ACT/SAT) – SAT - Critical Reading and Math sections – ACT - English, Math, Reading and Science sections • Best sub-score from each section is used to determine the sum for initial eligibility • All attempts before initial full-time collegiate enrollment may be used NCAA Initial Eligibility Requirements – Division I Division I • Core Course GPA – Only core courses that appear on the high school’s list of NCAA approved core courses count toward the required 16 – Students must present a corresponding test score and core-course GPA on the sliding scale – Core course GPA is calculated using the best grades in the 16 core courses NCAA Initial Eligibility Requirements – Division I Abbreviated Division I Sliding Scale The full sliding scale can be found at eligibilitycenter.org under Resources.
    [Show full text]