DOCSLIB.ORG

Stilt 50 Stilt 50 – Oct 2006 the Journalstilt for the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stilt 50 Stilt 50 – Oct 2006 the Journalstilt for the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Table of Contents Stilt 50 Stilt 50 – Oct 2006 The JournalStilt for the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Table of Contents Editorial – Ken Rogers....................................................................................................................................................1 A Note from the Chairman – Ken Gosbell......................................................................................................................1 Understanding the Numbers and Distribution of Waders and other Animals in a Changing World: Habitat Choice as the Lock and the Key – T. Piersma ..........................................................................................................3 Shorebirds of the Sea of Okhotsk: Status and Overview – Y.N.Gerasimov & F. Huettmann......................................15 Conservation of Migratory Shorebirds and their Habitats in the Sea of Okhotsk, Russian Far East, in the Year 2006: State-of-the-Art and an Outlook – F. Huettmann & Y.N.Gerasimov ..................................................23 Shorebird and Gull Census at Moroshechnaya Estuary, Kamchatka, Far East Russia, During August 2004 – R. Schuckard, F. Huettmann, K. Gosbell, J. Geale, S. Kendall, Y. Gerasimov, E. Matsina & W. Geeves ...............................................................................................................................................................34 The Journal for the East Asian-Australasian Flyway The Fourth Full Shorebird Survey of Yalu Jiang National Nature Reserve. 13–23 April 2006 – A. Riegen, G. Vaughan, K. Woodley, B. Postill, Z. Guangming, W. Tao & S. Dongyu ..........................................................47 The Importance of Jiuduansha Wetlands for Shorebirds During Northward Migration: Energy- Replenishing Sites or Temporary Stages? – Zhijun Ma, Chiyeung Choi, Xiaojing Gan, Si Zheng & Jiakuan Chen ...........................................................................................................................................................54 Shorebird Numbers at the Jiuduansha Wetlands During the 2005 Southward Migration – Si Zheng, Chiyeung Choi, Xiaojing Gan, Zhijun Ma, Shimin Tang & Jing Zhu.....................................................................58 South Korea’s Shorebirds: A Review of Abundance, Distribution, Threats and Conservation Status – N. Moores................................................................................................................................................................62 Northwards Migration of Shorebirds through Saemangeum, the Geum Estuary and Gomso Bay, South Korea in 2006 – D.I. Rogers, N. Moores & P.F. Battley.........................................................................................73 An Overview of the Status and Abundance of Migratory Waders in Sumatra, Indonesia – A.C. Crossland, S.A. Sinambela, A.S. Sitorus & A.W. Sitorus.........................................................................................................90 Shorebirds in the Inner Gulf of Thailand – P.D. Round...............................................................................................96 Shorebirds in New Guinea: Their Status, Conservation and Distribution – K.D. Bishop..........................................103 Migration Routes of Waders which spend the Non-Breeding Season in Australia – C. Minton, J. Wahl, R. Jessop, C. Hassell, P. Collins & H. Gibbs ........................................................................................................135 China and New Zealand Shorebird Site Partnership: A Model for Inter-Site Co Operation – K. Woodley ...............158 Population Monitoring in Australia: Some Insights after 25 Years and Future Directions – K. Gosbell & R. Clemens ............................................................................................................................................................162 Causes of Variation in Population Monitoring Surveys: Insights from Non-Breeding Counts in North- Western Australia, 2004–2005 – D.I. Rogers, K.G. Rogers, K.B. Gosbell & C.J. Hassell ...................................176 The Blind Men and the Elephant: Concerns about the use of juvenile proportion data – B.J. McCaffery, C.M. Handel, R.E. Gill, Jr. & D.R. Ruthrauff .......................................................................................................194 Demographic Models for Red-necked Stint and Curlew Sandpiper in Victoria – K.G. Rogers & K. Gosbell..............................................................................................................................................................205 Are We Neglecting the Non-Migratory Shorebirds of the East Asian–Australasian Flyway? – M.A Weston ..........................................................................................................................................................215 The History of Wader Studies in North-West Australia – C. Minton .........................................................................224 Measurements, Weights and Primary Wing Moult of Oriental Plover from North-West Australia – N.J.B.A. Branson & C.D.T. Minton ......................................................................................................................235 An Assessment of Shorebird Monitoring in Queensland by the Queensland Wader Study Group – D. Milton & P. Driscoll .........................................................................................................................................242 South Australian Wader Studies – An Overview – compiled by M. Christie .............................................................249 The Breeding of Banded Stilt and Red-Necked Avocet in the Coorong, South Australia: December 2005 – February 2006. – K. Gosbell & M. Christie........................................................................................................277 /CTOBER The History and Achievements of the Victorian Wader Study Group – C. Minton....................................................285 Shorebirds in New Zealand – D.S. Melville & P.F. Battley........................................................................................295 Papers in Australian Wader Study Group Journals 1980–2006 – H. Phillipps ...........................................................304 AWSG Number 50 • October 2006 Australasian Wader Studies Group Stilt 50 (2006) STATE CONSERVATION OFFICERS QUEENSLAND Michele Burford, 23 Fernbourne Rd, Wellington Point Qld 4163. Ph: (07) 3822 3759 Email: [email protected] NEW SOUTH WALES Phil Straw, PO Box 2006, Rockdale Delivery Centre, Rockdale NSW 2216. Ph: (02) 9597 7765 Email: [email protected] TASMANIA Stilt Priscilla Park, 98 Nowra Rd, Roches Beach Tas 7021 Email: [email protected] ISSN 0726-1888 Ralph Cooper (North/North East Tas) 7 Beach Rd, Legana Tas © AWSG 7277. Ph: (03) 6330 1255 Email: [email protected] Publication date: April 2007 (see inside back cover) SOUTH AUSTRALIA MISSION STATEMENT David Close, 30 Diosma Dr, Coromandel Valley SA 5051 To ensure the future of waders and their habitats in Australia Email: [email protected] through research and conservation programmes, and to VICTORIA encourage and assist similar programmes in the rest of the Doris Graham, 14 Falconer St, Fitzroy Vic 3068. East Asian–Australasian Flyway. Ph (03): 9482 2112 Email: [email protected] OBJECTIVES WESTERN AUSTRALIA • To monitor wader populations through a programme of Mike Bamford, 23 Plover Way, Kingsley WA 6065. counting and banding in order to collect data on Ph: (08) 9309 3671 Email: [email protected] changes on a local, national and international basis. • To study the migrations of waders through a INTERNATIONAL REPRESENTATIVES programme of counting, banding, colour flagging and NEW ZEALAND collection of biometric data. North Island: • To instigate and encourage other scientific studies of Adrian Riegen, 213 Forest Hill Rd, Waiatarua, Auckland 0612, waders such as feeding and breeding studies. New Zealand. Ph: (09) 814-9741 • To communicate the results of these studies to a wide audience through Stilt, the Tattler, other journals, the South Island: internet, the media, conferences and lectures. Paul Sagar, Ornithological Society of New Zealand, • To formulate and promote policies for the conservation 38a Yardley St, Christchurch 4. Ph: (03) 342-9720 of waders and their habitat, and to make available ASIA information to local and national governmental Doug Watkins, Manager Wetlands International – Oceania, PO conservation bodies and other organisations to Box 4573, Kingston ACT 2604 AUSTRALIA. encourage and assist them in pursuing this objective. Ph: +61 2 6260 8341. • To encourage and promote the involvement of a large Email: [email protected] band of amateurs, as well as professionals, to achieve these objectives. OTHER COMMITTEE MEMBERS Rosalind Jessop, David Close, Pete Collins, Chris Hassell, OFFICE BEARERS David Milton, Clive Minton, Doug Watkins and Adrian Riegen. Chairman: Ken Gosbell, 17 Banksia Ct, Heathmont Vic 3135, AUSTRALIA. Ph: (03) 9729 5524. MEMBERSHIP OF THE AUSTRALASIAN WADER Email: [email protected]. STUDIES GROUP Vice Chairman: Phil Straw, P.O. Box 2006, Rockdale Membership of the AWSG is open to anyone interested in the Delivery Centre NSW 2216, AUSTRALIA. conservation and research of waders (shorebirds) in the East Ph and fax: (02) 9597 7765. Asian–Australasian Flyway. Members receive the twice yearly Email: [email protected]
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Challenges in Conserving Bahal Temples of Sri-Wijaya Kingdom, In
    International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-9, Issue-1, October 2019 Challenges in Conserving Bahal Temples of Sriwijaya Kingdom, in North Sumatra Ari Siswanto, Farida, Ardiansyah, Kristantina Indriastuti Although it has been restored, not all of the temples re- Abstract: The archaeological sites of the Sriwijaya temple in turned to a complete building form because when temples Sumatra is an important part of a long histories of Indonesian were found many were in a state of severe damage. civilization.This article examines the conservation of the Bahal The three brick temple complexes have been enjoyed by temples as cultural heritage buildings that still maintains the authenticity of the form as a sacred building and can be used as a tourists who visit and even tourists can reach the room in the tourism object. The temples are made of bricks which are very body of the temple. The condition of brick temples that are vulnerable to the weather, open environment and visitors so that open in nature raises a number of problems including bricks they can be a threat to the architecture and structure of the tem- becoming worn out quickly, damaged and overgrown with ples. Intervention is still possible if it is related to the structure mold (A. Siswanto, Farida, Ardiansyah, 2017; Mulyati, and material conditions of the temples which have been alarming 2012). The construction of the temple's head or roof appears and predicted to cause damage and durability of the temple. This study used a case study method covering Bahal I, II and III tem- to have cracked the structure because the brick structure ples, all of which are located in North Padang Lawas Regency, does not function as a supporting structure as much as pos- North Sumatra Province through observation, measurement, sible.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Macrozoobenthic Diversity in the New River Flow of Pinang City, Labuhan Batu Selatan
    Study of Macrozoobenthic Diversity in the New River Flow of Pinang City, Labuhan Batu Selatan Leli Febriani1, Arman Harahap2 1,2Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Labuhanbatu, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract Keywords diversity; macrozoobenthos; Benthos is an organism that lives on the bottom of the waters, both in the form of animals and plants, living on the surface and on the arthropods; mollusks; bottom of the waters. This study aims to determine the diversity of barumun river; Pinang city macrozoobenthic species in the Barumun River, Pinang City. The research starts from December 2020 to February 2021. Macrozoobenthic sampling using Surber net and Ekman Grab based on substrate differences in the riverbed. Macrozoobenthos found in the Barumun River in Pinang City consists of two phyla, namely Arthropoda and Molluscs. The phylum Arthropods found are from the class of insects belonging to the genera Hydropsyche, Polycentropus, psephenus, Dryops, Anthopotamu, Acroneuria and Triops. The phylum Molluscs found were from the Bilvavia class which belonged to the Corbicula genus and from the Gastropod class of the Genera Melanoides and Melanatria. The highest macrozoobenthic abudance at each station was Polycentropus (65,67 ind L) and Potadoma (265,67 ind L). The highest macrozoobenthic abudance found was Melanatria at (633,67 ind L) based on the vulnerability index value (H) (2,087 – 1,003) dominance index (C) (0133 -0,389) and evenness index (E) (0,365- 0,603) Barumun River Kota Pinang is included in the good condition category with high species diversity. The physical and chemical factors of the waters are able to support macrozoobenthic life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the Least Documented Language Families in the World
    Vol. 4 (2010), pp. 177-212 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4478 The status of the least documented language families in the world Harald Hammarström Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig This paper aims to list all known language families that are not yet extinct and all of whose member languages are very poorly documented, i.e., less than a sketch grammar’s worth of data has been collected. It explains what constitutes a valid family, what amount and kinds of documentary data are sufficient, when a language is considered extinct, and more. It is hoped that the survey will be useful in setting priorities for documenta- tion fieldwork, in particular for those documentation efforts whose underlying goal is to understand linguistic diversity. 1. InTroducTIon. There are several legitimate reasons for pursuing language documen- tation (cf. Krauss 2007 for a fuller discussion).1 Perhaps the most important reason is for the benefit of the speaker community itself (see Voort 2007 for some clear examples). Another reason is that it contributes to linguistic theory: if we understand the limits and distribution of diversity of the world’s languages, we can formulate and provide evidence for statements about the nature of language (Brenzinger 2007; Hyman 2003; Evans 2009; Harrison 2007). From the latter perspective, it is especially interesting to document lan- guages that are the most divergent from ones that are well-documented—in other words, those that belong to unrelated families. I have conducted a survey of the documentation of the language families of the world, and in this paper, I will list the least-documented ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Sericornis, Acanthizidae)
    GENETIC AND MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION AND PHYLOGENY IN THE AUSTRALO-PAPUAN SCRUBWRENS (SERICORNIS, ACANTHIZIDAE) LESLIE CHRISTIDIS,1'2 RICHARD $CHODDE,l AND PETER R. BAVERSTOCK 3 •Divisionof Wildlifeand Ecology, CSIRO, P.O. Box84, Lyneham,Australian Capital Territory 2605, Australia, 2Departmentof EvolutionaryBiology, Research School of BiologicalSciences, AustralianNational University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, and 3EvolutionaryBiology Unit, SouthAustralian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia ASS•CRACr.--Theinterrelationships of 13 of the 14 speciescurrently recognized in the Australo-Papuan oscinine scrubwrens, Sericornis,were assessedby protein electrophoresis, screening44 presumptivelo.ci. Consensus among analysesindicated that Sericorniscomprises two primary lineagesof hithertounassociated species: S. beccarii with S.magnirostris, S.nouhuysi and the S. perspicillatusgroup; and S. papuensisand S. keriwith S. spiloderaand the S. frontalis group. Both lineages are shared by Australia and New Guinea. Patternsof latitudinal and altitudinal allopatry and sequencesof introgressiveintergradation are concordantwith these groupings,but many featuresof external morphologyare not. Apparent homologiesin face, wing and tail markings, used formerly as the principal criteria for grouping species,are particularly at variance and are interpreted either as coinherited ancestraltraits or homo- plasies. Distribution patternssuggest that both primary lineageswere first split vicariantly between
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Chile a Photo Guide
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be 88 distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical 89 means without prior written permission of the publisher. WALKING WATERBIRDS unmistakable, elegant wader; no similar species in Chile SHOREBIRDS For ID purposes there are 3 basic types of shorebirds: 6 ‘unmistakable’ species (avocet, stilt, oystercatchers, sheathbill; pp. 89–91); 13 plovers (mainly visual feeders with stop- start feeding actions; pp. 92–98); and 22 sandpipers (mainly tactile feeders, probing and pick- ing as they walk along; pp. 99–109). Most favor open habitats, typically near water. Different species readily associate together, which can help with ID—compare size, shape, and behavior of an unfamiliar species with other species you know (see below); voice can also be useful. 2 1 5 3 3 3 4 4 7 6 6 Andean Avocet Recurvirostra andina 45–48cm N Andes. Fairly common s. to Atacama (3700–4600m); rarely wanders to coast. Shallow saline lakes, At first glance, these shorebirds might seem impossible to ID, but it helps when different species as- adjacent bogs. Feeds by wading, sweeping its bill side to side in shallow water. Calls: ringing, slightly sociate together. The unmistakable White-backed Stilt left of center (1) is one reference point, and nasal wiek wiek…, and wehk. Ages/sexes similar, but female bill more strongly recurved. the large brown sandpiper with a decurved bill at far left is a Hudsonian Whimbrel (2), another reference for size. Thus, the 4 stocky, short-billed, standing shorebirds = Black-bellied Plovers (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Sanitation in Indonesia
    Research Report August 2008 Economic Impacts of Sanitation in Indonesia A five-country study conducted in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines, and Vietnam under the Economics of Sanitation Initiative (ESI) Water and Sanitation Program East Asia and the Pacifi c (WSP-EAP) World Bank Offi ce Jakarta Indonesia Stock Exchange Building Tower II/13th Fl. Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 52-53 Jakarta 12190 Indonesia Tel: (62-21) 5299-3003 Fax: (62-21) 5299-3004 Printed in 2008. The volume is a product of World Bank staff and consultants. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of acceptance of such boundaries. Research Report August 2008 Economic Impacts of Sanitation in Indonesia A fi ve-country study conducted in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines, and Vietnam under the Economics of Sanitation Initiative (ESI) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary At 55% in 2004, sanitation coverage in Indonesia is below the regional average for Southeast Asian countries of 67%. Nationwide, sanitation coverage has increased by 9 percentage points since 1990, representing signifi cant progress towards the target of 73% set by the Millennium Development Goal joint water supply and sanitation target.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Archipel, 100 | 2020 [En Ligne], Mis En Ligne Le 30 Novembre 2020, Consulté Le 21 Janvier 2021
    Archipel Études interdisciplinaires sur le monde insulindien 100 | 2020 Varia Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/archipel/2011 DOI : 10.4000/archipel.2011 ISSN : 2104-3655 Éditeur Association Archipel Édition imprimée Date de publication : 15 décembre 2020 ISBN : 978-2-910513-84-9 ISSN : 0044-8613 Référence électronique Archipel, 100 | 2020 [En ligne], mis en ligne le 30 novembre 2020, consulté le 21 janvier 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/archipel/2011 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.2011 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 21 janvier 2021. Association Archipel 1 SOMMAIRE In Memoriam Alexander Ogloblin (1939-2020) Victor Pogadaev Archipel a 50 ans La fabrique d’Archipel (1971-1982) Pierre Labrousse An Appreciation of Archipel 1971-2020, from a Distant Fan Anthony Reid Echos de la Recherche Colloque « Martial Arts, Religion and Spirituality (MARS) », 15 et 16 juillet 2020, Institut de Recherches Asiatiques (IRASIA, Université d’Aix-Marseille) Jean-Marc de Grave Archéologie et épigraphie à Sumatra Recent Archaeological Surveys in the Northern Half of Sumatra Daniel Perret , Heddy Surachman et Repelita Wahyu Oetomo Inscriptions of Sumatra, IV: An Epitaph from Pananggahan (Barus, North Sumatra) and a Poem from Lubuk Layang (Pasaman, West Sumatra) Arlo Griffiths La mer dans la littérature javanaise The Sea and Seacoast in Old Javanese Court Poetry: Fishermen, Ports, Ships, and Shipwrecks in the Literary Imagination Jiří Jákl Autour de Bali et du grand Est indonésien Śaivistic Sāṁkhya-Yoga:
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia (Republic Of)
    Indonesia (Republic of) Last updated: 31-01-2004 Location and area Indonesia is an island republic and largest nation of South East Asia, stretching across some 5,000 km and with a north-south spread of about 2,000 km. The republic shares the island of Borneo with Malaysia and Brunei Darussalam; Indonesian Borneo, equivalent to about 75 per cent of the island, is called Kalimantan. The western half of New Guinea is the Indonesian province of Irian Jaya (formerly West Irian); the eastern half is part of Papua New Guinea. The marine frontiers of Indonesia include the South China Sea, the Celebes Sea, and the Pacific Ocean to the north, and the Indian Ocean to the south and west. Indonesia has a land area of 1,904,443 km2. (Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2002). According to Geoanalytics (www.geoanalytics.com/bims/bims.htm) the land area of Indonesia comprises 1,919,663 km2. Topography Indonesia comprises 13,677 islands on both sides of the equator, 6,000 of which are inhabited. Kalimantan and Irian Jaya, together with Sumatra (also called Sumatera), Java (Jawa), and Celebes (Sulawesi) are the largest islands and, together with the insular provinces of Kalimantan and Irian Jaya, account for about 95 per cent of its land area. The smaller islands, including Madura, Timor, Lombok, Sumbawa, Flores, and Bali predominantly form part of island groups. The Moluccas (Maluku) and the Lesser Sunda Islands (Nusatenggara) are the largest island groups. The Java, Flores, and Banda seas divide the major islands of Indonesia into two unequal strings. The comparatively long, narrow islands of Sumatra, Java, Timor (in the Nusatenggara group), and others lie to the south; Borneo, Celebes, the Moluccas, and New Guinea lie to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Forest and Peatland Exploitation Towards Decreasing Biodiversity of Fishes in Rangau River, Riau-Indonesia
    I J A B E R, Vol. 14, No. 14 (2016): 10343-10355 THE IMPACT OF FOREST AND PEATLAND EXPLOITATION TOWARDS DECREASING BIODIVERSITY OF FISHES IN RANGAU RIVER, RIAU-INDONESIA Yustina* Abstract: This survey study was periodically conducted in July, 6 times every year. There were 3 periods: 1st period (2002); 2nd period (2008) and 3rd period (2014). It sheds light on the impact of forest and peat land exploitation on decreasing biodiversity of fishes in Rangau River, Riau- Indonesia. Using some catching tools such as landing net, fishing trap, fishnet stocking and fishing rod. The sampling activity was administered at eight stations which were conducted by applying “catch per unit effort technique” in primary time: 19.30-07.30, for 3 repetitions for each fish net measurement within 30 minutes at every station, at position or continuously casting. The sampled fish were selected which were relatively in minor size but had represent their features and species. The fish were labelled and were preserved with 40% formalin. The determination and identification of fish were conducted at laboratory. Secondary data was collected by mean of interviewing the local fishermen about the surrounding environment condition of Rangau river. Data analysis consisted of biodiversity data, biodiversity index and fish existence frequency. The finding in 1st period, in 2002, total caught fish were 60 species: 36 genera and 17 families. In 2nd period in 2008, total caught fish were 38 species which consist of 30 genera and 16 families. In 3rd period, in 2014, there were 23 of fish species were found comprising 17 genera, 12 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea Ii
    The Greater Bird-of-paradise display we witnessed at the km 17 lek in Kiunga was truly unforgettable. PAPUA NEW GUINEA II 12– 28 August / 1 September 2016 LEADER: DANI LOPEZ VELASCO Our second tour to Papua New Guinea – including New Britain - in 2016 was a great success and delivered an unprecedented number of high quality birds. A total of 21 species of Birds-of-paradise (BoPs), - undoubtedly one of the most extraordinary, and “out of this world” bird families in the world, were recorded, perhaps most memorable being a superb male Blue BoP, scoped at close range near Kumul for as long as we wished and showing one of the most vivid blue colours in the animal world. Just as impressive though were spectacular performances by displaying Raggiana and Greater BoPs in excellent light, with up to 8 males lekking at a time, a stunning male King BoP and two displaying males Twelve-wired BoPs at the Elevala River, a cracking adult male Magnificent BoP in the scope for hours at Tabubil, several amazing King-of-Saxony BoPs, waving their incredible head plumes like some strange insect antennae in the mossy forest of Tari Valley, great sightings of both Princess Stephanie´s and Ribbon-tailed Astrapias with their ridiculously long tail feathers, superb scope studies of Black and Brown Sicklebills uttering their machine-gun like calls, and so on. While Birds-of-paradise are certainly the signature family in PNG, there is of course 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Papua New Guinea II www.birdquest-tours.com plenty more besides, for example we recorded a grand total of 33 species of pigeons and doves, -they reach their greatest diversity here in New Guinea, as do kingfishers-, including nine Fruit Doves, a rare New Guinea Bronzewing feeding on the road, and, during the extension, both Black Imperial Pigeon and Pied Cuckoo-Dove.
    [Show full text]