Mick Mcgahey Donald Maclntyre

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mick Mcgahey Donald Maclntyre 60 September 1986 Marxism Today CLOSE UP ON Mick McGahey Donald Maclntyre ick McGahey leaves the 1981. And his steadfast refusal to TUC general council this criticise his two colleagues in the month having finally 'Troika' (his word) at the top of the emerged as a focus for NUM must at times have cost him opposition, albeit still muted, to dear. Arthur Scargill within the NUM. For there were signs below the When Peter Heathfield was elected surface during the strike that general secretary in February 1984, it McGahey was less than wholly happy was widely assumed that he would with its conduct. Privately - and still use the constitutional authority without criticising the NUM president invested in the job to assert himself as - McGahey let it be known that he a counterweight to Scargill. would prefer more emphasis on attacked by both Heathfield and energy. In the early stages of the 1984-5 propaganda which stressed coal as a Scargill on the grounds that he had McGahey's Communist party miners' strike it was McGahey who national asset. The lobby of been a willing party to the decision by membership has always been central thundered that the rightwing parliament, proposed as a welcome the Left not to pursue a ballot. That to his union activities, and he has suffered from 'ballotitis' and that the distraction from mass picketing and was true; neither McGahey nor played a significant and sometimes union would not be designed to raise the wider energy Bolton had questioned the strategy at critical role in recent debates about 'constitutionalised' out of taking issues, was McGahey's idea. the time. McGahey, undaunted, rose the future of the party. When asked action, while Heathfield was thought McGahey's liking for the to Bolton's defence at the Scottish what he would do when he retired to harbour doubts about the wisdom broadly-based political campaign was miners' conference in June of last from the NUM leadership, McGahey is of a strike that might close more pits illustrated by the success of the year. reported to have said that he would than it could save. coalitions-including politicians and He had not believed in a ballot at be seeking a safe Communist seat in Yet two years later it is McGahey, church figures-which the Scottish the time, he frankly admitted, but the Scotland. the Communist vice president of the NUM assembled in support of sacked failure to hold one had caused No doubt the split within the NUM, and not Heathfield, who is miners and the Scottish steel industry, problems. Moreover, a ballot might Communist party, a member of whose cutting a distinctive figure in the the latter of which campaigns was have been won, he suggested, and in executive he has been for over 20 NUM Left. contemptuously dismissed by Scargill that case Notts might well have come years, has sharpened his differences McGahey has still not broken at Tenby. out. with Scargill, who has continued to openly with 'that young man', as he Nor did Scargill and Heathfield's As recently as this summer Norman side with the Morning Sterfaction. has referred to Scargill for years. But distaste for involving the TUC find Stone, the eminent historian, recently But it is McGahey, the lifelong this year's NUM conference in Tenby favour with the vice president. described McGahey as a typical 'red Communist, rather than Scargill, the marked a turning point. McGahey Indeed, it was McGahey who was Clydesider'. In fact, of course, his Labour party member, who is made two significant interventions. forced to telephone his two background is a different one. The emerging as the voice for unity within The first was on Nottinghamshire in colleagues in Sheffield on the eve of son of a founder member of the the NUM, and with the Labour which he warned against putting the 1984 TUC congress and insist that Communist party, McGahey grew up leadership. obstacles in the way of reuniting the they travelled to Brighton to meet in Shotts before the family was forced The Carter critique, along with NUM. The second, seemingly trivial Len Murray and other senior TUC to move to Cambuslang when heavy input from South Wales NUM but with wider implications, was over leaders for the first time since the McGahey's father lost his job in the activists, helped to inform Kinnock's the role of the press, once again beginning of the strike. Lanarkshire coalfield after the 1926 electrifying attack on the NUM ritually attacked by Scargill. Both these issues, the failure to strike. president during last year's Labour McGahey gently reminded his make the wider case for coal and to It is astonishing, too, to leaf party conference. McGahey remained audience that one of the conference's involve the TUC more deeply from the through newspaper cuttings silent at the time, but after a meeting purposes was to address a wider start of the dispute, were raised in the describing him as a cold man with Kinnock on the eve of this year's audience and that the media were now famous critique by Peter Carter, incapable of small talk: widely read, Scottish Labour conference, McGahey the vehicle for that message. Within the Communist party's industrial courteous to colleagues across the went out of his way to declare he had the executive he and Eric Clarke, the organiser, of the strike strategy. It whole political spectrum, a devoted no dispute with the Labour leader. Scottish miners' secretary, argued and was inconceivable that McGahey, as husband, father and grandfather, he It is unlikely that McGahey will voted against the arbitrary banning the most senior Communist in the has an endless fund of excellent trade openly condemn Scargill for his of Tom Condon, the industrial editor NUM, was not consulted on some of union and political anecdotes. continuing emphasis on industrial of Eddie Shah's Today. the ideas in the Carter paper. He is an avid newspaper reader confrontation and his bitter attacks McGahey is entitled to believe that But the Carter critique went with a critical interest in journalism on Notts miners as Spencerites before he has handsomely paid his debts of further; it questioned the mass and journalists. His most or after he steps down as vice loyalty to the NUM president. picketing strategy and most self-destructive traits are going to bed president in July; though there are Prevented from seeking the top job explosively of all, it argued that the too late if the company is good, and a many within the NUM and the Labour by the then president Joe Gormley's failure to hold a ballot had been heavy smoking habit. Yet for a man party who would like him to do so. procedural manouevre in the late 70s, central to the defeat of the strike. who was beaten up by unknown But it is the wider political struggle to which prevented officials over 55 When George Bolton, Communist attackers towards the end of the defeat Thatcherism, rather than the from running, McGahey helped to party chairperson, suggested as much miners' strike, and who has had ideological purism of Scargill and his mobilise the Left in support of the publicly in a post-strike Marxism indifferent health for several years, supporters, which is commanding the Yorkshire president's campaign in Today seminar, he was bitterly he is still displaying a good deal of formidable McGahey loyalties now..
Recommended publications
  • Chapters the Politics of the Strike
    Durham E-Theses The 1984/85 Miners strike in East Durham, A study in contemporary history. Atkin, Michael How to cite: Atkin, Michael (2001) The 1984/85 Miners strike in East Durham, A study in contemporary history., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2015/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE IN EAST DURHAM, A STUDY IN CONTEMPORARY IDSTORY BY MICHAEL ATKIN The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged appropriately. THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. MAY 2001. 2 2 MAR 2002 CONTENTS Page PREFACE 1 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • National Women Against Pit Closures: Gender, Trade Unionism
    National Women Against Pit Closures: gender, trade unionism and community activism in the miners’ strike, 1984–5 Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite and Natalie Thomlinson Introduction The miners’ strike began on 6 March 1984, provoked by the NCB’s (National Coal Board) announcement of the imminent closure of pits whose coal reserves were not exhausted yet (though before 6 March, many pits were already undertaking unofficial action). Quickly, many pits struck in solidarity with those facing closure; Yorkshire and Scotland area National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) members were soon all out, and on 12 March NUM President Arthur Scargill called for action in all coalfields in solidarity with those areas already on strike.1 From just a few days into the strike, support groups sprang up in coalfield areas. These were generally made up predominantly or only of women.2 Their main activities were the organisation of communal feeding, food parcels, and vouchers and money for food and other essentials. They received very little money from the NUM (some received small start-up donations), and raised their own funds through events, street collections and asking for donations. Some also picketed (though not all: some did not want to, and some men refused to let their wives go on picket lines).3 Women marched to show their support for the strike, and some travelled in Britain and abroad, to give speeches to publicise the struggle and raise money. There was a huge effort to document their activities by those involved, both at the time and shortly after the strike: this was one of the striking things about the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Alterfactual History and the 1984-5 Miners' Strike
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Salford Institutional Repository ALTERFACTUAL HISTORY AND THE 1984-5 MINERS’ STRIKE Article for Capital and Class April 2005 Dr. Ralph Darlington, School of Management, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT [email protected] - - 1 INTRODUCTION In the early 1970s Britain was swept by a wave of militant industrial struggle, the depth and political character of which was unprecedented since the 1920s, both in terms of the sheer scale of strike activity involved and because it witnessed some of the most dramatic confrontations between unions and government in postwar Britain. One of the most notable high points of struggle was the 1972 miners’ strike for higher wages, which delivered the miners their ‘greatest victory’ (Hall, 1981) and inflicted a devastating defeat on the Conservative government headed by Edward Heath. The strike, with its mass pickets, provided a vivid illustration of the power and confidence of shopfloor union organization that had been built up in the post-war period (Darlington and Lyddon, 2001; Lyddon and Darlington, 2003). Although the miners won another victory in 1974, culminating in a general election that brought down the Heath government, this strike was altogether a much more passive dispute compared with 1972, with a tight control on picketing under TUC-supported guidelines of only six pickets imposed by the NUM executive. A much more marked contrast occurred with the 1984-5 miners’ strike, which took place against the backcloth of a deep economic recession, an avalanche of redundancies and closures, and a neo-liberal Conservative government headed by Margaret Thatcher that displayed its resolve to fight with and beat any trade-union (the ‘enemy within’) that sought to challenge its authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Civil War Over Coal
    Britain’s Civil War over Coal Britain’s Civil War over Coal: An Insider's View By David Feickert Edited by David Creedy and Duncan France Britain’s Civil War over Coal: An Insider's View Series: Work and Employment By David Feickert Edited by David Creedy and Duncan France This book first published 2021 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2021 by Jing Feickert All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-6768-0 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-6768-9 Dedicated by David Feickert to Marina and Sonia and to the lads who so often took him away from them, his family, for ten years. In memory of Kevin Devaney, miner, lecturer, trade unionist, political activist—a good friend and wry observer of coal mining life. In memoriam David Feickert 1946-2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures............................................................................................ ix List of Tables .............................................................................................. x Foreword ................................................................................................... xi Preface ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Containing, Isolating, and Defeating the Miners: the UK Cabinet Ministerial Group on Coal and the Three Phases of the 1984-85 Strike
    Phillips, J. (2014) Containing, isolating, and defeating the miners: The UK Cabinet Ministerial Group on Coal and the three phases of the 1984-85 strike. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 35, pp. 117-141. Copyright © 2014 Liverpool University Press A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge Content must not be changed in any way or reproduced in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder(s) When referring to this work, full bibliographic details must be given http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/104494 Deposited on: 27 March 2015 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 Jim Phillips, ‘Containing, Isolating and Defeating the Miners: the UK Cabinet Ministerial Group on Coal and the three phases of the 1984–5 Strike’, Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 35 (2014), 117-141 The thirtieth anniversary of the start of the 1984–5 miners’ strike in Britain coincided with the release of various UK government archive papers under the 30-year rule. Media and press coverage of this release concentrated on two issues. First, Arthur Scargill, president of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), was broadly right when he argued before and during the strike that there was a secret Conservative government and National Coal Board (NCB) ‘hit list’, framing the closure over a three-year period of roughly seventy five pits with the loss of perhaps 64,000 of the industry’s 200,000 jobs. Margaret Thatcher, the Prime Minister, discussed this list in a meeting on 15 September 1983 with Nigel Lawson, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Peter Walker, Secretary of State for Energy, and Norman Tebbit, Secretary of State for Employment, together with various officials, yet the government consistently claimed in public that a much smaller programme of shrinkage, possibly extending only to twenty pits, was being contemplated.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Thatcher & the Miners
    Pierre-François GOUIFFES MARGARET THATCHER & THE MINERS 1972-1985 Thirteen years that changed Britain Creative Commons Licence 2009 This e-book is the English translation of “Margaret Thatcher face aux mineurs”, Privat, France (2007) Comments on the French edition Lord Brittan (Home Secretary 1983-5, former Vice-President of the European Commission) “The fairness and accuracy of the book are impressive both in the narrative and the analysis. I am not aware of anything comparable to what Pierre-François Gouiffès has produced.” Dr Kim Howells MP (now Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, spokesman for the NUM South Wales area in 1983-5) “Mr. Gouiffès’ book describes key events, such as the 'winter of discontent' and the industrial disputes of the eighties which had a major impact on the Labour party.” Other material available on www.pfgouiffes.net or www.mtfam.fr TABLE OF CONTENT Foreword 3 Prologue: the rise and fall of ‘King Coal’ 12 Coal: its economic, social and symbolic importance in the United Kingdom during the 19th century 13 The painful aftermath of World War One 18 The search for consensus after 1945 24 Tensions escalate from the 1960s 29 The NUM victorious: the strikes of 1972 and 1974 42 Crystallization of conflict 43 The 1972 blitzkrieg strike 51 1974: an arm-wrestling contest leading to strike and General Election 63 The legacy of the strikes of the 1970s 75 1974-1984 : the Labour interlude and Margaret Thatcher's early performance 80 The Labour interlude 81 The early years of Margaret Thatcher 108 The 1984-5 strike part one: from explosion to war of attrition 133 First steps in the conflict 134 The flashpoint 143 2 MRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mining Papers FEICKERT DOCUMENTS (MS202, 402)
    Coal Mining Papers FEICKERT DOCUMENTS (MS202, 402) University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: MS202, MS402 Title: Feickert Documents Scope: Documents relating to the work of Dave Feickert, former National Union of Mineworkers research officer 1983-1993. Dates: 1972-2004 Level: Fonds Extent: 73 boxes Name of creator: Dave Feickert (1946-2014) Administrative / biographical history: The collection consists of documents and working papers covering the period of the Great Strike (1984-5) and the subsequent privatisation and decline of the coal industry. It includes correspondence, newspaper and journal articles, and material published during the strike period. It also includes documents relating to clean coal technology, health and safety issues and alternative forms energy. As well as being a trade union research officer, Dave Feickert was an ergonomist and specialist in stress research. He undertook PhD research at the University of Bradford and was a member of the Working Environment Research Group where his work included research into technology, health and safety and related areas for the trade union movement. He was appointed Assistant Head of Industrial Relations for the NUM in 1983 and then NUM Research Officer from 1985 to 1993. He later moved to New Zealand where he worked as a mines safety and energy advisor for New Zealand, China and Europe. Dave Feickert died in July 2014. Source: By donation in 1997, 2004 and 2009 System of arrangement: By category Subjects: Coal mines and mining – England; Coal Strike,
    [Show full text]
  • A Strike Against the Law? Tony Weir
    Maryland Law Review Volume 46 | Issue 1 Article 12 A Strike Against the Law? Tony Weir Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Tony Weir, A Strike Against the Law?, 46 Md. L. Rev. 133 (1986) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol46/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STRIKE AGAINST THE LAW?* TONY WEIR** Recent experience having taught me that subjects like the Ro- man law of property and obligations, being dead and detailed, quickly induce ennui in the late twentieth-century mind, it seemed right to try to find for this Gerber lecture a theme both topical and general. The recent coal-miners' strike in England suggested itself, though I am by no means a labour lawyer. The strike is topical enough, for we are still trying to recover from it, and it raises the question of the role of law in society, English or not, which is a mat- ter surely sufficiently general. 1 The strike lasted a whole year, bar a day or two.2 It had been preceded by a partial stoppage, an overtime ban, for four months. The strike was not total, but two-thirds of our 180,000-odd miners were out, and most of the pits were idle.' The cost of the strike is very variously computed.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Book As A
    POLMAISE THE FIGHT FOR A PIT By JOHN McCORMACK (former Polmaise NUM delegate) with Simon Pirani 1 National Union of Mineworkers' Scottish area Preface and national conferences, the Polmaise NUM minutes and other written material. Rowland to the 2015 edition Sheret, Alex McCallum, Johnny Higgins and other members and former members of the This book by John McCormack was first NUM helped fill in some details. John published in 1989 by Index Books. This new McCormack checked and amended the final edition is published on line with John’s text. Simon Pirani . permission. It is free for anyone and everyone to download, copy, print and distribute. The text is unchanged. I have added a few explanatory notes. The cover photo, and the one of the Polmaise banner on page 27, are from the Newsline archive; all the rest are copied from the original book. My thanks to Clapham Andy, who helped put this edition together. Simon Pirani . ■ Cover photo: Polmaise miners at a A guide for demonstration in London, 19 April 1984. non-miners Preface to the 1989 edition You descend a pit by the SHAFT. All workmen going down are given two TOKENS: a brass John McCormack, who comes from a mining one which they take down the pit, and a zinc family, worked at Polmaise colliery in Fallin, one which is handed to the checker. This is a Stirlingshire, from the time he left school in safety measure: in the event of an accident 1947 until October 1985. His working life the tokens can be checked. The BANKSMEN thus began when the coal industry was are responsible for the CAGE (a lift) which nationalised and ended during the Tory descends the shaft; they “bell you down the government’s onslaught on the pits following pit”, ringing a bell to indicate at which level the 1984-1985 national strike.
    [Show full text]
  • North East History Volume 43 East
    north east history north north east history volume 43 east history N orth Volume 43 2012 E ast H istory 43 2012 Follonsby Lodge, Wardley banner carried in the Durham Miners Gala 2012 Ray Challinor Chartism and Co-operation in the North East Nigel Todd The Wallsend Owenites The north east labour history society holds regular meetings on Katarina Friberg Trade, Gender and Membership-Co-operative a wide variety of subjects. The society welcomes new members. Policy and Practice in North East England and We have an increasingly busy web-site at www.nelh.org Southern Sweden in the late 19th and early Supporters are welcome to contribute to discussions 20th Century Kath Connolly A New Rochdale ? The Sunderland Poor Store journal of the north east labour history society Volume 43 http://nelh.org/ 2012 journal of the north east labour history society north east history north east Volume 43 2012 history ISSN 14743248 © 2012 NORTHUMBERLAND Printed by Azure Printing Units 1 F & G Pegswood Industrial Estate Pegswood Morpeth TYNE & Northumberland WEAR NE61 6HZ Tel: 01670 510271 DURHAM TEESSIDE journal of the north east labour history society www.nelh.net 1 north east history Editorial 5 Covers Notes & Acknowledgements 12 Notes on Contributors 15 Articles Co-operatives in the North East Chartism and Co-operation in the North East Ray Challinor 18 The Wallsend Owenites. Nigel Todd 25 Trade, Gender and Membership-Co-operative Katarina Friberg 42 Policy and Practice in North East England and Southern Sweden in the late 19th and early 20th Century A New Rochdale? The Sunderland Poor Store.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Flying the Red Flag? Communists in the National
    1 ‘FLYING THE RED FLAG? COMMUNISTS IN THE NATIONAL UNION OF MINEWORKERS, 1945-1985’. SHERYL BERNADETTE BUCKLEY Ph.D. Thesis 2015. 2 ‘Flying the Red Flag? Communists in the National Union of Mineworkers, 1945-1985’. Volumes: I Sheryl Bernadette Buckley Submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford School of Arts and Media 2015 3 Contents I Communism and Coal pp.12- 38 1.0 The end p.12 1.1 Being British Communists p.13 1.2 The industrial strategy p.15 1.3 The Labour Party p.20 1.4 Building British Bolsheviks p.23 1.5 Perceptions of the strategy and party responses p.27 1.6 Perceptions of strength p.29 1.7 The CP and the NUM p.31 1.8 Self-identification p.37 II Literature Review pp.38- 61 2.0 Studying the CP and the NUM p.38 2.1 Why communist history? p.37 2.2 Ownership of the communist past p.40 2.3 Transparency p.41 2.4 Debates p.42 2.5 The CP and the Soviet Union p.44 2.6 The Cold War and industrial politics p.44 2.7 The link between King Street and coalfield Communists p.46 2.8 Proving the link: evidence p.48 2.9 Horner and the party p.49 2.1.0 Post-nationalisation changes? p.51 2.1.1 Unofficial strikes p.52 2.1.2 Official strikes p.53 2.1.3 Agitators or instigators? p.54 2.1.4 Wage militancy and surplus labour p.55 2.1.5 Economism and politicisation p.56 2.1.6 Scargillism p.58 2.1.7 Main research objectives and originality p.61 III Sources and Methods pp.62-71 3.0 The Historical Method p.62 3.1 Sources p.62 3.2 Labour History and Study Centre, Manchester p.63 3.3 Working
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Scargill, to Presen His Presidential Address
    PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS MR. M. McGAHEY (Vice-President): Colleagues and friends, it gives me great pleasur to call upon the President of the National Union of Mineworkers, Arthur Scargill, to preSen his Presidential Address. Arthur Scargill. (Agreed) 490 MR. A. SCARGILL (President, National Union of Mineworkers): Conference meets this year following the longest, most bitter and possibly most savage national strike ever seen anywhere in the world. We meet not in the aftermath but still in the midst of a historic and heroic struggle waged by this Union and mining communities against the most reactionary coal industry management seen since the 1920s and 30s - a struggle in which we have had to face the combined weight of the most reactionary and destructive Government Britain has known in over a century. We have come through a strike which has changed the course of British history: a conflict of tremendous significance which has resounded around the world - a conflict which has transformed the lives of those who stood and fought against the National Coal Board's disastrous pit closure programme - a conflict which has inspired workers in this and other countries to defend the right to work. The National Union of Mineworkers has challenged the very heart of the capitalist system. We have refused to accept that any industry in capitalist society - whether public or private - has the right to destroy the livelihood of men and women at the stroke of an accountant's pen. Our challenge has been met by an Establishment reaction of unprecedented savagery. The pit closure programme announced by the Board on the 6th March, 1984, was a deliberate action, designed to provoke our Union into either taking strike action or backing down in the face of Coal Board policy.
    [Show full text]