DOCSLIB.ORG

Armenia Geographic Distribution of Poverty and Inequality Public Disclosure Authorizedpublic Disclosure Authorized

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Armenia Geographic Distribution of Poverty and Inequality Public Disclosure Authorizedpublic Disclosure Authorized Report No.41181-AM Report No.Armenia andInequality DistributionofPoverty Geographic 41181-AM Armenia Geographic Distribution of Poverty and Inequality Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized June 2007 Human Development Sector Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized National Statistical Service Yerevan, Armenia Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Country Director: Donna Dowsett-Coirolo Sector Director Tamar Manuelyan Atinc Country Manager Aristomene Varoudakis Sector Manager: Arup Banerji Task Team Leader: Lire Ersado Report No. 41181-AM ARMENIA Geographic Distribution of Poverty and Inequality June 2007 Human Development Sector Unit National Statistical Service Europe and Central Asia Region Yerevan, Armenia Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Country Director: Donna Dowsett-Coirolo Sector Director Tamar Manuelyan Atinc Country Manager Aristomene Varoudakis Sector Manager: Arup Banerji Task Team Leader: Lire Ersado CONTENTS Page Acknowledgement...................................................................................................................................i I. Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Background......................................................................................................................................1 Objectives and Target Audience......................................................................................................4 II. Data Sources and Methodology.......................................................................................................6 Data..................................................................................................................................................6 Administrative Regions of Armenia ................................................................................................6 Methodology....................................................................................................................................7 Regression Domains ........................................................................................................................7 III. Geographic Distribution of Poverty.................................................................................................9 Measures of Poverty and Inequality ................................................................................................9 Robustness of the Results ................................................................................................................9 Verifications at the Community Level...........................................................................................10 Comparing Poverty Estimates from Survey and Poverty Mapping...............................................11 Distribution of Welfare across Marzs ............................................................................................13 Urban and Rural Dimensions of Poverty .......................................................................................14 Poverty at the Rayon Level............................................................................................................15 Rural Poverty at the Rayon Level ..................................................................................................16 Urban Poverty at the Rayon Level .................................................................................................17 Poverty among Yerevan Communities ..........................................................................................18 Poverty Incidence and Absolute Number of Poor .........................................................................19 Inequality in Armenia ....................................................................................................................21 IV. Maps of Poverty and Its Correlates................................................................................................23 Poverty and Accessibility ..............................................................................................................23 Poverty and Landownership ..........................................................................................................24 Poverty and Elevation....................................................................................................................25 Livestock Population and Poverty .................................................................................................27 Poverty and Education ...................................................................................................................28 V. Capacity Building ..........................................................................................................................29 VI. Use and Limitations of the Poverty Mapping ................................................................................30 VI. Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................................................31 Reference..............................................................................................................................................32 Annex A: Poverty Mapping Methodology ...........................................................................................33 Annex B: Survey, Population Census and Ancillary Variables ...........................................................38 Annex C: Poverty and Inequality in Marzs and Rayons of Armenia ...................................................46 Annex D: Ranking of Rayons by Poverty ............................................................................................50 Figures Figure 1: Poverty mapping predictions lie within 95% confidence intervals of the 2004 ILCS poverty headcount .............................................................................................................................................12 Figure 2: Spatial disparities in poverty in Armenia are large .............................................................13 Figure 3: Pockets of high poverty rates are widespread in Armenia ..................................................15 Figure 4: Poverty among Rural Rayons ..............................................................................................17 Figure 5: Poverty among urban communities within marz ................................................................18 Figure 6: Estimate of poverty rates among Yerevan districts .............................................................19 Figure 7: Areas of high poverty rates are not necessarily areas of high concentration of poor .........20 Figure 8: Density of poor population in Yerevan ...............................................................................21 Figure 9: Yerevan and Lori exhibit higher rate of inequality than the rest of the marzs ....................22 Figure 10: Proximity to marz center is generally associated with low poverty ..................................24 Figure 11: Availability of irrigable land is generally associated with low poverty ............................25 Figure 12: High elevation areas appear poorer than the rest ..............................................................26 Figure 13: Longer summer duration is correlated with lower poverty incidence ...............................26 Figure 14: Livestock sector contributes to poverty alleviations .........................................................27 Figure 15: Rayons with higher percentage of its population with higher education enjoy better living standard ...............................................................................................................................................28 Tables Table 1: Armenia has achieved impressive reduction in poverty between 1998/99 and 2005............. 1 Table 2: There are important geographic disparities in living standards ..............................................3 Table 3: The sample structure of the 2004 ILCS data and regression domains ...................................8 Table 4: Unobserved location effects are significantly small. ..............................................................9 Table 5: Urban-rural differentials in poverty are substantial. .............................................................14 Table 6: Number of rayons with higher than the national rate of poverty .........................................16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This report is part of the Armenia Programmatic Poverty Assessment work. It is jointly produced by the National Statistics Service (NSS) of the Republic of Armenia and the World Bank. This joint product between the NSS and the World Bank follows the long tradition of good cooperation between the Government of Armenia and the World Bank to better understand poverty and living conditions of the people of Armenia. The work could not have been possible without the strong support of the President of the NSS, Mr. Stepan Mnatsakanyan. Other key members of the team from the NSS side included Ms. Diana Martirosova (Head, Household Survey Division), Ms. Karine Kuyumjyan (Head, Population Census and Demography Division), Laert Harutiunyan (Head of Division, Information Technology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59 Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP for OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE's J
    UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59th Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP FOR OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE’S JOINT SUBMISSION TO THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE ON THE FOURTH PERIODIC REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OF PUNISHMENT October 17, 2016, Yerevan, Armenia Hereby, the Partnership for Open Society Initiative,1 representing more than 60 civil society organizations, presents a joint submission prepared by the following civil society organizations, public monitoring groups, human rights lawyers and attorneys: 1. Coalition to Stop Violence Against Women; 2. Center for Rights Development NGO; 3. Committee to Protect Freedom of Expression; 4. Foundation Against the Violation of Law NGO; 5. Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly–Vanadzor; 6. Helsinki Committee of Armenia Human Rights Defender NGO; 7. Journalists' Club Asparez; 8. Open Society Foundations – Armenia; 9. Protection of Rights without Borders NGO; 10. Rule of Law Human Rights NGO; 11. Group of Public Monitors Implementing Supervision over the Criminal-Executive Institutions and Bodies of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia; 12. Public Monitoring Group at the Detention Facilities of the Police of the Republic of Armenia; 13. Davit Khachaturyan, Justice Group, Open Society-Foundations-Armenia, Expert, Ph.D; 14. Inessa Petrosyan, Attorney; 15. Tigran Hayrapetyan, Attorney; 16. Tigran Safaryan, Attorney; 17. Vahe Grigoryan, Attorney, Legal Consultant at EHRAC (Middlesex University). Contacts Persons David Amiryan Karine Ghazaryan Open Society Foundations-Armenia Open Society Foundations-Armenia Deputy Director for Programs Civil Society Program Coordinator E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 1 http://www.partnership.am/en/index 1 Contents INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Report
    International Organziation for Caucasus Research Resource Centers – ARMENIA European Commission Migration A Program of the Eurasia Foundation “PROFILE OF POTENTIAL LABOUR MIGRANTS” Analytical Report on a Sample Survey Conducted in Armenia (January 2007) in the framework of the IOM project “Informed Migration – An Integral Approach to Promoting Legal Migration through National Capacity Building and Inter-regional DIalogue between the South Caucasus and the EU” Contracting agency: International Organization for Migration Armenia Office Contractor/Implementer: Caucasus Research Resources Centers-Armenia/A program of the Eurasia Foundation Yerevan February 2007 1 Content 1. General Overview of the Conducted Survey ................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. The Survey Scope and Geography ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Survey and Sampling Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Conducting the Survey and the Working Group .................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Fieldwork Results .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Analysis of Survey Results ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, Republic of | Grove
    Grove Art Online Armenia, Republic of [Hayasdan; Hayq; anc. Pers. Armina] Lucy Der Manuelian, Armen Zarian, Vrej Nersessian, Nonna S. Stepanyan, Murray L. Eiland and Dickran Kouymjian https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004089 Published online: 2003 updated bibliography, 26 May 2010 Country in the southern part of the Transcaucasian region; its capital is Erevan. Present-day Armenia is bounded by Georgia to the north, Iran to the south-east, Azerbaijan to the east and Turkey to the west. From 1920 to 1991 Armenia was a Soviet Socialist Republic within the USSR, but historically its land encompassed a much greater area including parts of all present-day bordering countries (see fig.). At its greatest extent it occupied the plateau covering most of what is now central and eastern Turkey (c. 300,000 sq. km) bounded on the north by the Pontic Range and on the south by the Taurus and Kurdistan mountains. During the 11th century another Armenian state was formed to the west of Historic Armenia on the Cilician plain in south-east Asia Minor, bounded by the Taurus Mountains on the west and the Amanus (Nur) Mountains on the east. Its strategic location between East and West made Historic or Greater Armenia an important country to control, and for centuries it was a battlefield in the struggle for power between surrounding empires. Periods of domination and division have alternated with centuries of independence, during which the country was divided into one or more kingdoms. Page 1 of 47 PRINTED FROM Oxford Art Online. © Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Journalists in Armenia in 2008-9
    Contents PREFACE...........................................................................................88 PART I: VIOLENCE......................................................................... 91 Kristine Aghalaryan: Assailants Unknown: Investigation Surrounding Assault on Reporter Dropped.............................................................92 Ararat Davtyan: Mere Coincidence? Vardan Ayvazyan’s Links to Baghdasaryan Assault….......................................................99 Ararat Davtyan: Photo-Journalist’s Attackers Pardoned; Criminal Proceedings Dropped …....................................................106 Ararat Davtyan: Assault on Argishti Kiviryan is Attempted Murder…………………....108 Kristine Aghalaryan: Six Reporters Assaulted During Yerevan Municipal Elections…….. 113 Kristine Aghalaryan: Reporters Prevented From Covering the Story: SMEJA Officials Disagree……………............................................... 117 Ararat Davtyan: T.V. Anchor Nver Mnatsakanyan Assaulted: Perpetrators Never Identified….........................................................119 PART II: JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA IN THE COURTS..... 121 Kristine Aghalaryan: Mayor of Ijevan v Investigative Journalists: Plaintiff to Appeal Lower Court Decision……………........................ 122 A. Simonyan: Municipality of Ijevan v The Investigative Journalists: The Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights is like a “Voice in the Desert”……………..........................................126 Kristine Aghalaryan, Ararat Davtyan: Photo-Journalist Gagik Shamshyan
    [Show full text]
  • SPACES YEREVAN Publictalks Program-1
    www. utopiana.am [email protected] Baghramyan 50 G / 8 ,Yerevan, Armenia 00374 [10] 261035, 00374 [94] 355185 Utopiana.am invites you to October 8-12, 2012 PUBLIC TALKS Yerevan a participatory art and culture events program As a part of SPACES caravan PUBLIC TALKS brings together artists, curators, researchers, architects and other cultural workers along with civil society groups and students from Armenia, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine in order to foster networking, self-education, social research and policy debates in the region. The program consists of several components: artistic interventions in various public spaces, talks and presentations by Armenian art and cultural critics taking place in context-specific venues, study visits to independent cultural institutions and a final cultural policy debate formatted as a panel discussion that will follow up the events and happenings program. The overwhelming tyranny of neoliberal, ‘free’ market economy, ‘new capitalist order with Asian values’ (in terms of its suppression of democratic freedoms) as Zizek coints it and its consequences in social and political realms both in Armenia and globally (rise of the new right, ecological nationalism, widespread protest movements, claims for the recuperation of public spaces and wider social benefits) stress the importance of rethinking a period or rather a condition, where the foundations of contemporary situation of rapid commercialization and social disenfranchisement were laid. Heavy industrialization, ideological totality, claims for new types of social and physical environments, failed system of both state-planned and free market economies, these are all the bitter fruits of Modern- ism/modern condition that the contemporary society has to cope with.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Armenian Switzerland to the Wild Caucasus (M-ID: 2647)
    +49 (0)40 468 992 48 Mo-Fr. 10:00h to 19.00h Through the Armenian Switzerland to the wild Caucasus (M-ID: 2647) https://www.motourismo.com/en/listings/2647-through-the-armenian-switzerland-to-the-wild-caucasus from €2,590.00 Dates and duration (days) On request 11 days On the Enduro trip Through Armenian Switzerland to the wild Caucasus you will experience, partly on gravel roads, the touristically still quite unknown Armenia with its ancient culture, sights and world heritage sites. From the Trchkan waterfall in the north, the most water-rich 160km asphalt | Sanahin and Haghpat, both impressive in Armenia, over the Armenian Switzerland, along Lake monasteries, situated high above the Debed Gorge and Sevan, to the wild southern Caucasus, the tour leads us. UNESCO World Heritage Site Ijevan, city of caravanserais. Along the route, old monasteries and churches bear witness to the first Christian country, prehistoric menhirs Day 5: Ijevan / Navur / Lake Parz / Dilijan and burial sites to the ancient history. In the very south, 150km asphalt, 75km gravelroad | Via gravel road to Navur with its high mountain ranges and deep gorges, through and into the mountains to Lake Parz. Lake Parz is a clear whose lonely forests bears and leopards still roam, where mountain lake in the nature park of Dilijan, climatic health gold and copper are mined, the route takes us over winding resort Dilijan in the nature park of the same name with pass roads to near the border with Iran. summer houses of Dimitri Shostakovich and Benjamin Britten. Discover Armenia on the tour Through Armenian Switzerland to the wild Caucasus, which has only appeared Day 6: Dilijan / Semyonovka / Lake Sevan / Noraduz / on tourist maps again since its independence 30 years ago, Vardenyants Pass / Yeghegnadzor has just recently managed a velvet revolution and is 175km asphalt uncharted territory for Western European travellers.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2177 ______
    The Nor Arevik Coal Deposit, Southern Armenia By Brenda S. Pierce, Gourgen Malkhasian, and Artur Martirosyan U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2177 _______________________________________ All data relating to the Nor Arevik coal deposit — stratigraphic, coal quality, and resource information — are contained in this one comprehensive, interpretive report U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 2000 Published in the Eastern Region, Reston, Va. Manuscript approved for publication on October 4, 2000 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report is being released online only. It is available on the World Wide Web at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/bulletin/b2177/ Contents Introduction . 1 Source of data . 1 Previous work . 2 Age . 2 Stratigraphic data . 3 Coal quality of the Nor Arevik deposit . 5 Coal quality analyses . 5 Petrographic descriptions . 6 Other analyses . 7 Coal resource calculations of the Nor Arevik deposit . 8 Resource terminology . 8 Archival resource estimates . 9 Recalculation of resource estimates . 10 Conclusions . 10 References cited . 10 Figures 1. Location map of Armenia’s coal, carbonaceous shale, and oil shale deposits . 11 2. Geologic map of the Nor Arevik coal and carbonaceous shale deposit . 12 Tables 1. Borehole, adit, and trench data from exploration done by Tarayan (1942) and Drobotova and Saponjian (1996) on the Nor Arevik coal deposit . 13 2. Proximate analyses of samples from the Nor Arevik coal deposit . 41 3. Chemical analyses of combustible shales from Drobotova and Saponjian (1996) .
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Establishment of Computer Labs in 50 Schools of Vayots Dzor
    Establishment of Computer Labs in 50 schools of Vayots Dzor Region, RA List of beneficiary schools Number of Number of Current Numbers of computers Number of students in Number of School Director Tel. number of printers to to be students middle and teachers computers be donated donated high school Yeghegnadzor subregion Hovhannisyan 1 Agarakadzor sch. 093-642-031 10 1 121 79 27 Naira 2 Aghavnadzor sch. Manukyan Nahapet 091-726-908 2 10 1 230 130 32 Yedigaryan 3 Aghnjadzor sch. 093-832-130 0 5 1 46 26 16 Hrachya 4 Areni sch. Hayrapetyan Avet 093-933-780 0 10 1 221 130 29 5 Artabuynq sch. Babayan Mesrop 096-339-704 2 10 1 157 100 24 6 Arpi sch. Hovsepyan Ara 093-763-173 0 10 1 165 120 22 7 Getap sch. Qocharyan Taguhi 093-539-488 10 10 1 203 126 35 8 Gladzor sch. Hayrapetyan Arus 093-885-120 0 10 1 243 110 32 9 Goghtanik sch. Asatryan Anahit 094-305-857 0 1 1 15 5 8 10 Yelpin sch. Gevorgyan Jora 093-224-336 4 6 1 186 100 27 11 Yeghegis sch. Tadevosyan Levon 077-119-399 0 7 1 59 47 23 Yeghegnadzor N1 12 Grigoryan Anush 077-724-982 10 10 1 385 201 48 sch. Yeghegnadzor N2 13 Sargsyan Anahit 099-622-362 15 10 1 366 41 sch. Khachatryan 14 Taratumb sch. 093-327-403 0 7 1 59 47 17 Zohrab 15 Khachik sch. Tadevosyan Surik 093-780-399 0 8 1 106 55 22 16 Hermon sch.
    [Show full text]
  • Yerevan Green City Action Plan
    DRAFT (3 July 2017) Yerevan Green City Action Plan Yerevan 2017 OFFICIAL USE Yerevan’s Green City Action Plan Disclaimer This Green City Action Plan was prepared for the City of Yerevan by an international team of experts led by Ernst & Young, s.r.o. (Czech Republic). Other members of the consortium included GEOtest, SWECO, SEVEn and local experts. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the Czech Government's Official Development Assistance Technical Cooperation Fund or the City of Yerevan do not carry any responsibility for the selection, involvement and monitoring of Ernst & Young and / or any third party claims towards EBRD for utilizing services provided by Ernst & Young. 1 OFFICIAL USE Executive Summary In the light of continuous global urbanization, sustainable development challenges increasingly stem from cities. Yerevan is fully aware of these challenges, as the administrative as well as economic centre of Armenia, the overall economic prosperity of the country is substantially anchored on Yerevan’s economic development The quality of the urban environment, including air, water, soil, biodiversity, environmental assets and ecosystems are negatively impacted by human activities such as transport, energy, water use and waste management. In the recent years, many measures have already been taken to remedy the situation, but the measures should be doubled in the coming years to raise the quality of life in the City to standards seen in many European cities. These efforts will also help Yerevan contribute to global efforts in climate change mitigation and the transition to green economy. Methodology The Green City Action Plan (GCAP) was developed by applying 4 stage methodology, which is as follows: Stage 1 focused on relevant information and data identification, collection, processing and analysis to establish the baseline indicators, which rank the city compared to internationally recognized benchmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Hostage Crisis Continues
    JULY 23, 2016 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXVII, NO. 1, Issue 4445 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF French Senate to Armenia Hostage Crisis Continues Discuss Armenian Genocide YEREVAN (Combined Sources) — Pro- opposition gunmen are holding four police PARIS (PanARMENIAN.Net) — The French officers hostage, officials said Tuesday, July Senate will discuss the bill to outlaw the denial of 19, two days after they seized a police the Armenian Genocide in September, Armenia’s building, killing one officer and taking sev- public TV reports. eral hostages. The French National Assembly on July 1 voted The gunmen seized the police station on unanimously to penalize denial or trivialization of Sunday, before demanding Armenians take all crimes against humanity, including the to the streets to secure the release of jailed Armenian Genocide. opposition politicians. The amendment of a previous law, adopted in the first reading, criminalizes denial with one year (PHOTOLUR PHOTO) imprisonment and a 45,000 euro fine. The crimes included in the text are genocides, “other crimes against humanity,” “the crime of enslavement and exploitation of an enslaved per- son” and “war crimes.” City of Ani on UNESCO Demonstrators in Yerevan (Russia Times Photo) World Heritage List PARIS (PanARMENIAN.Net) — The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural situation without bloodshed,” far refused to surrender. Organization (UNESCO) cultural agency on Jirair Sefilian, second from left, as he was arrested in June Armenia’s first deputy police The hostages include Armenia’s Deputy Friday, July 15 added a ruined Armenian city inside chief Hunan Pogosyan told AFP.
    [Show full text]