Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge: Draft Environmental Impact

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge: Draft Environmental Impact Public Services Technical Report Multnomah County | Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge Project Portland, OR January 29, 2021 Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge Public Services Technical Report Prepared for Multnomah County Transportation Division – Bridges 1403 SE Water Ave Portland, OR 97214 Prepared by HDR 1050 SW 6th Ave, Suite 1800 Portland, OR 97204 T (503) 423-3700 Parametrix 700 NE Multnomah St, Suite 1000 Portland, OR 97232 T (503) 233-2400 Contract# DCS-SVCSGEN-857-2019-conv HDR Project #10144814 CERTIFICATION The technical material and data contained in this document were prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned, as an environmental professional. ______________ Signature Reserved for Final Version Prepared by Justina Everhart (Environmental Planner) ______________ Signature Reserved for Final Version Checked by Jen Hughes (Senior Environmental Planner) ______________ Signature Reserved for Final Version Approved by Heather Catron (Consultant Project Manager) Public Services Technical Report Multnomah County | Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge Project Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Project Location ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 2 2 Project Alternatives ............................................................................................................................. 4 3 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................ 4 4 Legal Regulations and Standards ....................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Laws, Plans, Policies, and Regulations .................................................................................... 5 4.1.1 Federal ......................................................................................................................... 5 4.1.2 State of Oregon ............................................................................................................ 5 4.1.3 City of Portland ............................................................................................................. 6 4.1.4 City of Portland 2035 Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies .................................. 6 4.2 Design Standards ...................................................................................................................... 8 5 Affected Environment .......................................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Area of Potential Impact ............................................................................................................ 8 5.2 Resource Identification .............................................................................................................. 8 5.2.1 Published Sources and Databases .............................................................................. 8 5.3 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................. 10 5.3.1 Public Safety and Emergency Response ................................................................... 10 5.3.2 Educational Resources .............................................................................................. 12 5.3.3 U.S. Postal Service .................................................................................................... 13 5.3.4 Waste Disposal .......................................................................................................... 13 5.3.5 Field Visits and Surveys ............................................................................................. 13 5.3.6 Point Resources ......................................................................................................... 13 5.3.7 Mobile Resources ....................................................................................................... 15 6 Impact Assessment Methodology and Data Sources ....................................................................... 16 6.1 Long-Term Impact Assessment Methods ............................................................................... 16 6.2 Short-Term Impact Assessment Methods ............................................................................... 16 6.3 Indirect Impact Assessment Methods ..................................................................................... 16 6.4 Cumulative Impact Assessment Methods ............................................................................... 17 7 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................................... 17 7.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 17 7.2 Pre-Earthquake Impacts.......................................................................................................... 17 7.2.1 No-Build Alternative.................................................................................................... 18 7.2.2 Enhanced Seismic Retrofit Alternative ....................................................................... 18 7.2.3 Replacement Alternative with Short-span Approach ................................................. 19 7.2.4 Replacement Alternative with Long-Span Approach ................................................. 21 7.2.5 Replacement Alternative with Couch Extension ........................................................ 21 7.3 Post-Earthquake Impacts ........................................................................................................ 22 7.3.1 No-Build Alternative.................................................................................................... 22 7.3.2 Enhanced Seismic Retrofit Alternative ....................................................................... 23 7.3.3 Replacement Alternative with Short-Span Approach ................................................. 24 January 29, 2021 i Public Services Technical Report Multnomah County | Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge Project 7.3.4 Replacement Alternative with Long-Span Approach ................................................. 24 7.3.5 Replacement Alternative with Couch Extension ........................................................ 25 7.4 Construction Impacts ............................................................................................................... 25 7.4.1 Without Temporary Bridge ......................................................................................... 26 7.4.2 With Temporary Bridge .............................................................................................. 27 7.4.3 Potential Off-Site Staging Areas ................................................................................ 27 7.5 Cumulative Effects .................................................................................................................. 28 7.5.1 No-Build Alternative.................................................................................................... 28 7.5.2 Build Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 28 7.6 Compliance with Laws, Regulations, and Standards .............................................................. 29 7.6.1 No-Build Alternative.................................................................................................... 29 7.6.2 Build Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 29 7.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 30 8 Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................................................... 31 8.1.1 Enhanced Seismic Retrofit Alternative ....................................................................... 31 8.1.2 Replacement Alternative with Short-Span Approach ................................................. 31 8.1.3 Replacement Alternative with Long-Span Approach ................................................. 31 8.1.4 Replacement Alternative with Couch Extension ........................................................ 31 8.1.5 Construction Impacts Mitigation ................................................................................. 31 9 Contacts and Coordination ................................................................................................................ 32 10 Preparers ........................................................................................................................................... 33 11 References ........................................................................................................................................ 34 Tables Table 1. Impacted Public
Recommended publications
  • "Art Feeling Grows" in Oregon : the Portland Art Association, 1892-1932
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-2011 "Art Feeling Grows" in Oregon : The Portland Art Association, 1892-1932 Patrick A. Forster Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Forster, Patrick A., ""Art Feeling Grows" in Oregon : The Portland Art Association, 1892-1932" (2011). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 220. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.220 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. “Art Feeling Grows” in Oregon: The Portland Art Association, 1892-1932 by Patrick A. Forster A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Thesis Committee: David A. Horowitz, Chair Richard H. Beyler David A. Johnson Sue Taylor Portland State University ©2011 ABSTRACT Founded in 1892, the Portland Art Association (PAA) served as Oregon’s and the Pacific Northwest’s leading visual arts institution for almost a century. While the Association formally dissolved in 1984, its legacy is felt strongly today in the work of its successor organizations, the Portland Art Museum and Pacific Northwest College of Art. Emerging during a period of considerable innovation in and fervent advocacy for the arts across America, the Association provided the organizational network and resources around which an energetic and diverse group of city leaders, civic reformers and philanthropists, as well as artists and art educators, coalesced.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Session Worksheet
    CLACKAMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Policy Session Worksheet Presentation Date: 02/26/19 Approx. Start Time: 3:00 p.m. Approx. Length: 30 mins. Presentation Title: Willamette Falls Locks Briefing Department: Public and Government Affairs Presenters: Trent Wilson and Gary Schmidt Other Invitees: Dan Johnson (DTD, Director); Greg Geist (WES, Director); Laura Zentner (BCS, Director); Danielle Cowan (Tourism & Cultural Affairs, Executive Director) WHAT ACTION ARE YOU REQUESTING FROM THE BOARD? The Board of County Commissioners is being asked to consider if Clackamas County is willing to be a recipient of state funding to repair the Willamette Falls Locks, and manage relevant repairs while a new owner is being established. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Willamette Falls Locks State Commission (established by SB 256 in 2017) has advanced two legislative concepts for the 2019 State Legislative Session. HB 2304 authorizes issuance of lottery bonds to finance acquisition and restoration of Willamette Falls Locks. HB 2305 authorizes the Department of State Lands to perform work to acquire and restore operation of the Willamette Falls Locks. HB 2304 is a capital funding mechanism, while HB 2305 is a mechanism to determine non-federal ownership. As discussions have evolved at the legislative session, leaders in Salem have asked for more work to be done on HB 2305, related to the ownership questions. This works is being done by the Willamette Falls Locks State Commission members and staff. Meanwhile, the funding bill continues with good support at the state level. This separation of bills has left the question, if the funding bill were to pass and not the ownership bill, where will the money live should it be provided by the Legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospective Vendor Manual
    Portland Saturday Market Prospective Vendor Manual 2014 i Table of Contents Maps ii-iv Site Map, Direction from Administrative Office to Site Frequently Asked Questions A great start to the process, this section answers the most commonly v-vii asked questions, from “How do I get a Booth?” to “How much does it cost?” Background on Portland Saturday Market This section includes general information about our market, information 1-4 for new vendors, and explains the benefits of membership and the services provided for members Information about the Jury Process 5-16 This section includes jury guidelines, information regarding allowable products, product guidelines, and craft booth guidelines PSM Contact Information 17 How to Apply to Portland Saturday Market 18-20 Application Tips and Applications 21-30 Craft, Packaged Food, Plant/Farm Produce and Service Applications ii PSM SITE The Bridge Information Booth 2 SW Naito Parkway, Portland, OR 97209 (503)-241-4188 Hours of Operation Saturday Sunday 6:45 AM Info Booth Opens 8:45 AM 7:35 AM Allocation Begins 9:00 AM The Ramp 10:00 AM PSM Opens 11:00 AM 5:00 PM PSM Closes 4:30 PM 5:30 PM Info Booth Closes 5:00 PM The Plinth Court Food International Ankeny Plaza Waterfront Park – Plinth Waterfront Park – Under Bridge Food Court iii From PSM Administrative Office to PSM Site iv FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS) Can I sell items I haven’t made myself? No. While you may include items you have not made in your booth display, you may not sell, trade or give them away for free.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Falls Locks Willamette River Oregon Section 216 Preliminary Draft Disposition Study with Integrated Environmental Assessment
    WILLAMETTE FALLS LOCKS WILLAMETTE RIVER OREGON SECTION 216 PRELIMINARY DRAFT DISPOSITION STUDY WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Page 0 of 163 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Willamette Falls Locks Disposition Study is being conducted in order to determine whether sufficient federal interest exists to retain the project for its authorized purpose and, if not, to determine whether the project should be de-authorized, and if the associated real property and Government-owned improvements should undergo disposal. As part of the study effort, the analysis seeks to identify the necessary actions to prepare the facility for disposal and to develop a preliminary opinion regarding the marketability of the project, taking into account known stakeholder interests, local opportunities, and the capability of potential end users. The Willamette Falls Locks (Locks), the oldest multi-lift bypass navigation lock in the nation, is a six chamber lock system with 41 feet elevation change between the first and last chambers. The Locks operate by gravity flow, draining water from one lock chamber into the next through a set of slide gates located in the bottom of each gate. The authorized purpose of the project is to provide navigation between the waterway upstream and downstream of Willamette Falls (Falls), one of the largest waterfalls based on water volume in the United States. It is located approximately 26.2 river miles upstream on the Willamette River from the confluence with the Columbia River. The locks are near the cities of West Linn and Oregon City, Oregon, about 20 miles upstream of Portland, Oregon. Owned and operated by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oral History of Kellogg Lake
    An Oral History of Kellogg Lake By Nicole West City of Milwaukie December, 2009 An Oral History of Kellogg Lake; Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Methodology a. Preliminary Research of Non-Oral Sources 1 b. Citizen Interviews 2 c. Weaknesses of the Study 2 3. Historical Context a. Early Significance of Waterways on Regional Settlement 3 b. The Old Standard Mill and Origin of Kellogg Dam 5 4. An Oral History 1918-Present a. The Early Days; Enjoying Kellogg Lake 8 b. The Decline of Kellogg Lake 31 c. Kellogg Lake Today; The Milwaukie Presbyterian Church 37 d. Responding to Change; the Future of Kellogg Lake 38 5. Conclusions; Remembering Kellogg Lake 40 6. Appendix; News Articles and Images 1852-Present 42 Introduction Kellogg Lake has been a central geographical feature in Milwaukie for over 160 years, but today most Milwaukie citizens, even the Lake’s immediate neighbors, have little interaction with it. Technically speaking, Kellogg Lake is a man-made “impoundment” with a surface area of about 14 acres. Originally, Kellogg Creek was dammed to power the Standard Mill in 1858 and it served as a mill pond for about three decades. According to the US Army Corps of Engineers (2002), the original stream channel has become masked deep within the lakebed by about 17,500 cubic yards of sediment that is contaminated above legal standards set by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for both DDT and Chlordane. It has experienced frequent sewer overflows and is the recipient of a significant amount of stormwater runoff from surrounding residential properties, Lake Rd, and McLoughlin Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ubiquitous) Mobile
    Proposal for U.S. Department of Transportation Beyond Traffic: The Smart City Challenge Ubiquitous Mobility for Portland Contact: Portland Bureau of Transportation Maurice Henderson 503.823.6557 [email protected] February 4, 2016 BEYOND TRAFFIC: THE SMART CITY CHALLENGE UBIQUITOUS MOBILITY FOR PORTLAND Table of Contents Part 1 – VISION NARRATIVE ............................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Portland’s Smart City Enabling Environment ........................................................ 3 City Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 3 Existing Transportation System ............................................................................................... 5 UB Mobile PDX Key Projects and Site Map ............................................................................. 6 Environment Conducive to Demonstrating Proposed Strategies ........................................... 8 Continuity of Committed Leadership and Capacity to Carry out the Demonstration ............ 8 Commitment to Integrating with the Sharing Economy ....................................................... 10 Commitment to Making Open, Machine-readable Data Accessible, Discoverable, and Usable by the Public to Fuel Entrepreneurship and Innovation
    [Show full text]
  • MAX Station Optimization Consolidating Four MAX Stations in Downtown Portland Contents Context & Background
    MAX Station Optimization Consolidating four MAX Stations in Downtown Portland Contents Context & Background ................................................................................................................................. 3 The Portland Metropolitan Region is Growing ........................................................................................ 3 MAX Blue Line History .............................................................................................................................. 4 Jobs & Housing Access with an Equity Lens ............................................................................................ 5 Part of a Regional Focus on Transit Speed and Reliability ..................................................................... 6 Best Practices: Stop Spacing for Travel Time and Convenience ............................................................ 7 The Proposal and Decision Criteria ............................................................................................................. 9 Criteria: Proximity .................................................................................................................................. 10 Criteria: Access & Coverage.................................................................................................................... 15 Criteria: Safety ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Criteria: Ridership .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Public of Variety a Includes Brochure *This % Friday
    CL HQ DU Michael T. Hensley, Outside In Mural In Outside Hensley, T. Michael Esplanade Eastbank Katz Vera the along RIGGA, , Gate Echo , at Central Library Central at , Stair Garden Kirkland, Larry CN ! GL , at the Portland Center for the Performing Arts Performing the for Center Portland the at , Bollards Folly Otani, Valerie Park Waterfront McCall Tom , Shift River Gregoire, Mathieu in the North Park Blocks Park North the in Bao Bao Xi'an & Tung Da as well. as artworks commissioned by other agencies agencies other by commissioned artworks *This brochure includes a variety of public public of variety a includes brochure *This % Friday. through Monday 8:00-6:00, are IL GQ CN Manuel Izquierdo, Izquierdo, Manuel Ilan Averbuch, Ilan Averbuch, Dana LynnLouis, James Carpenter, Portland Building at 1120 SW 5th. Hours 5th. SW 1120 at Building Portland Art Gallery on the second floor of the of floor second the on Gallery Art www.racc.org/publicart or visit the Public the visit or www.racc.org/publicart Terra Incognita to go collection, the about more out Spectral Dome Light Metabolic Shift Metabolic Dreamer leading Percent-for-Art programs.* To find To programs.* Percent-for-Art leading County, and manages one of the country’s the of one manages and County, , Pettygrove Park , Pettygrove , Rose Quarter , Rose Multnomah and Portland of City the for art , Pearl District commissions and maintains public maintains and commissions (RACC) , PCPA Regional Arts & Culture Council Culture & Arts Regional The P ORTLAND C ULTURAL T OURS EN J. Seward Johnson, Allow Me, in Pioneer Courthouse Square.
    [Show full text]
  • Skidmore/Old Town Historic District Design Guidelines
    SKIDMORE/OLD TOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 18738, MAY 11, 2016 EFFECTIVE JUNE 10, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Portland City Council Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Document Production and Image Credits Charlie Hales, Mayor Charlie Hales, Mayor, Commissioner in Charge Max Brunke, Karen Karlsson, Rick Michaelson, Mark Nick Fish, Commissioner Susan Anderson, Planning Director Rabiner, Mark Raggett, Jessica Engeman, Carin Carlson Amanda Fritz, Commissioner Joe Zehnder, Principal Planner Consultants Steve Novick, Commissioner Sallie Edmunds, Central City Planning Manager KLK Consulting Dan Saltzman, Commissioner Project Staff Karen Karlsson Principal Portland Historic Landmarks Commission Nicholas Starin, City Planner, Project Manager Rick Michaelson Kirk Ranzetta, Chair Karl Lisle, City Planner, Past Project Manager Max Brunke Paul Solimano, Vice Chair Mark Raggett, City Planner Jessica Engeman Liza Mickle, City Planner Carin Carlson Amber Springberg, Community Service Aide Caroline Dao Krista Gust, Graphic Designer Kristin Minor Additional Agency Assistance In Memoriam Mattew Roman Kara Fioravanti, Bureau of Development Services Art DeMuro Tim Heron, Bureau of Development Services Jeff Joslin, Bureau of Development Services Hillary Adam, Bureau of Development Services Ross Plambeck, Portland Development Commission To help ensure equal access to City programs, services and activities, the City of Portland will provide translation, reasonably modify policies/procedures and provide auxiliary aids/ services/alternative formats to persons with disabilities. For accommodations, translations, complaints, and additional information, contact the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability at 503-823-7700, City TTY 503-823-6868, or use Oregon Relay Service: 711. Cover Image: Aerial Photo of Skidmore/Old Town Historic District Circa 2008 Funding was provided by the Portland Development Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Falls Locks Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    Willamette Falls Locks Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) What are the Willamette Falls Locks? • The Willamette Falls Locks, which opened in 1873, are located on the west bank of the Willamette River in West Linn, Ore. • The Locks were built to allow marine vessels to bypass the Falls and move timber and agricultural products to world markets. • The Locks are currently owned by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Why were the Locks shut down? • The Army Corps of Engineers closed the Locks and gave them a “non-operational status” in December 2011 due to failing gate anchors, needed repairs and a lack of potential national economic benefit to justify requests for federal funding to repair and reopen the Locks. What are the options for the Willamette Falls Locks? • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in the final stages of adopting a Final Disposition Report on the Locks. It is expected that the report will recommend doing some safety and seismic repairs to the Locks to prepare them for transfer to a new entity. This plan would not restore the Locks to operational status. • The Willamette Falls Locks Commission is investigating options for an entity to take over operation of the Locks from the Corps. The new owner could be either private, public or a combination of both. • If a transferee is not found, the Corps intends to decommission the Locks, which would involve installing a concrete bulkhead to maintain the dam and hydroelectric power plant, preventing future use of the Locks by Oregonians and visitors. What are the economic benefits of reopening the Locks? • Recommissioning the Locks would bring significant economic, cultural and recreational benefits to the region’s residents and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Johns Bridge Spanning Willamette River on U.S. Highway 30 Portland
    St. Johns Bridge HAER OR-40 Spanning Willamette River on U.S. Highway 30 Portland Multnomah County Oregon PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20013-7127 /-14 ER 0 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ST. JOHNS BRIDGE HAER OR-40 Location: Spanning Willamette River on U.S. Highway 30, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon UTM: Linnton, Oregon Quad. 10/518490/5047780 Date of Construction: 1929-31 Structural Type: Steel cable suspension bridge with reinforced-concrete towers and piers Engineer: Robinson & Steinman, New York, New York Fabricator: Wallace Bridge and Structural Steel Company, Seattle, Washington Builder: Piers 1-15--Gilpin Construction Company, Portland, Oregon Main cables--John A. Roebling's Sons Company, Trenton, New Jersey Viaduct--U.S. Steel Products Company, San Francisco Concrete deck--Lindstrom & Feigenson, Portland, Oregon West approach--La Pointe Construction Company, Portland, Oregon Owner: Multnomah County, 1929-76 Oregon Department of Transportation, 1976-present Use: Vehicular and pedestrian bridge Significance: The St. Johns Bridge represents many innovations in bridge design. At the time it was built it had the highest reinforced concrete rigid-frame piers in the world--these were tall arched concrete viaduct piers reinforced with structural steel frames. It was the first use of lofty main steel towers without conventional diagonal bracing. It used pre-stressed galvanized rope strands instead of parallel wire cables--this had been done only once before. It was the first use of reinforced concrete pedestal piles for the anchorage foundation. For the first time, auxiliary rope strands were incorporated in the cable backstays to anchor the tops of the rocker bents.1 The bridge represents regional and general bridge-building milestones.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland, Oregon
    Portland, Oregon Hints for getting around town: • East and West are divided by the Willamette River. • North and South are divided by Burnside St. • North Portland (NoPo) is on the east side of the river though. • North of Burnside in the NW, the streets are alphabetical, so next is Couch, then Davis, Everett, Flanders, and so on. • The numbers often give you a clue to how many streets north/south you are – 100 for each block (e.g., 650 NW 10th Ave. is on 10th btw. Hoyt & Johnson (remember to start w/Burnside)), or if you are on a name street, the number will correspond with the cross street (e.g., 1250 NW Glisan will be on Glisan btw. 12th & 13th). Easiest in the NW*. • "Downtown" refers to a portion of SW within the boundaries of the Willamette River and I-405, and south of Burnside St. • If you are driving, note that there are a lot of one-way streets. • The Portland Streetcar (goes more North/South) and MAX Light Rail (two lines east/west, and north/south) are free all day, every day within the Free Rail Zone (formerly Fareless Square) that includes downtown (within boundaries of Willamette River, NW Irving, and I-405), the Rose Quarter and the Lloyd District. Look for the Free Rail Zone signs. • FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, GO TO THE TRIP PLANNER ON HTTP://TRIMET.ORG • TAXIS: Radio Cab = #503.227.1212, and Broadway Cab = #503.227.1234 • Many restaurants in Downtown, the Pearl district, and NW Portland are within walking distance of the Hilton Hotel or a short ride on the Portland Streetcar or MAX Light Rail.
    [Show full text]