DOCSLIB.ORG

Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment by Opinion Research Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment by Opinion Research Services Waverley Borough Council Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report March 2018 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Waverley Borough Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment March 2018 Opinion Research Services | The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Steve Jarman, Claire Thomas and Ciara Small enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk © Copyright March 2018 Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government \licence v 3.0 Contains OS Data © Crown Copyright (2017) Please note that this is a revised Final GTAA Report following additional work to establish the needs of Travelling Showmen residing in or resorting to Waverley that was completed after the original publication date of June 2017 2 Opinion Research Services | Waverley Borough Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment March 2018 Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 6 Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................................................... 6 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Additional Pitch Needs – Gypsies and Travellers ........................................................................................ 7 Additional Plot Needs - Travelling Showpeople .......................................................................................... 8 Transit Requirements .................................................................................................................................. 9 2. Introduction ................................................................................................ 11 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 11 The Planning Definition in PPTS (2015) ..................................................................................................... 11 Definition of Travelling .............................................................................................................................. 12 Legislation and Guidance for Gypsies and Travellers ................................................................................ 14 PPTS (2015)................................................................................................................................................ 14 3. Methodology ............................................................................................... 16 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Glossary of Terms ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Desk-Based Review ................................................................................................................................... 16 Stakeholder Engagement .......................................................................................................................... 14 Working Collaboratively with Neighbouring Planning Authorities ........................................................... 14 Survey of Travelling Communities ............................................................................................................. 14 Engagement with Bricks and Mortar Households ..................................................................................... 15 Timing of the Fieldwork ............................................................................................................................. 17 Calculating Current and Future Need ........................................................................................................ 17 Applying the Planning Definition ............................................................................................................... 17 Unknown Households ............................................................................................................................... 18 Households that Do Not Meet the Planning Definition ............................................................................ 19 Supply of Pitches ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Current Need ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Future Need ............................................................................................................................................... 20 Pitch Turnover ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Transit Provision ........................................................................................................................................ 22 4. Gypsy, Traveller & Travelling Showpeople Sites & Population .................... 23 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Sites and Yards in Waverley ...................................................................................................................... 24 Traveller Caravan Count ............................................................................................................................ 24 3 Opinion Research Services | Waverley Borough Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment March 2018 5. Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................ 25 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Views of Key Stakeholders and Council Officers in Waverley Borough Council ....................................... 26 Accommodation for Gypsies and Travellers ............................................................................................. 26 Accommodation for Travelling Showpeople ............................................................................................. 26 Short-term Roadside Encampments ......................................................................................................... 27 Cross-border Issues ................................................................................................................................... 27 Neighbouring Authorities .......................................................................................................................... 28 Chichester District Council ........................................................................................................................ 28 East Hampshire District Council ................................................................................................................ 28 Guildford Council ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Hart District Council .................................................................................................................................. 30 Horsham District Council ........................................................................................................................... 31 Mole Valley District Council ...................................................................................................................... 32 Rushmoor Borough Council ....................................................................................................................... 33 6. Survey of Travelling Communities ............................................................... 35 Interviews with Gypsies and Travellers ..................................................................................................... 35 Interviews with Gypsies and Travellers in Bricks and Mortar ................................................................... 36 7. Current and Future Pitch Provision .............................................................. 37 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 37 Planning Definition .................................................................................................................................... 37 New Household Formation Rates ............................................................................................................. 37 Breakdown by 5 Year Bands ...................................................................................................................... 39 Applying the Planning Definition ............................................................................................................... 39 Bricks and Mortar Interviews .................................................................................................................... 40 Pitch Needs – Gypsies and Travellers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Farnham Neighbourhood Plan Review Sustainability Appraisal
    Farnham Neighbourhood Plan Review (Regulation 15) Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment Farnham Town Council December 2018 1 Contents Section 1 Introduction 3 Section 2: Key Sustainability Issues 10 Section 3: Sustainability Objectives 13 Section 4: Testing the Neighbourhood Plan Review Objectives 14 Section 5: Sustainability Appraisal of Development Options 19 Section 6: Sustainability Appraisal of Neighbourhood Plan Review Policies 29 Section 7: Conclusions 32 Appendix 1: Topic-based assessment of Farnham Baseline situation and Key 34 Issues Appendix 2: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment of 73 Policies Appendix 3: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment of 171 submitted housing sites not included in the Regulation 15 Neighbourhood Plan Review 2 Section 1 Introdiction What is Sustainability Appraisal/Strategic Environmental Appraisal? To help ensure that the Farnham Neighbourhood Plan Review is sustainable, it is best practice in the UK to undertake a Sustainability Appraisal (SA). An SA is a process that aims to predict and then assess the economic, environmental and social effects likely to arise from the adoption of the Neighbourhood Plan Review. Where a neighbourhood plan could have significant environmental effects, it may fall within the scope of the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 and so require a strategic environmental assessment (SEA). In April 2016, Waverley Borough Council issued a screening opinion that an SEA was required to be undertaken for the Farnham Neighbourhood Plan. As the Neighbourhood Plan Review provides for additional housing development to that included in the adopted Neighbourhood Plan, an SEA has been prepared for the Regulation 15 Review. One of the basic conditions that will be tested by the independent examiner of a Neighbourhood Plan is whether the making of the plan is compatible with European Union obligations (including under the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive).
    [Show full text]
  • Frensham Parish Council
    Frensham Parish Council Village Design Statement Contents 1. What is a VDS? 2. Introduction & History 3. Open Spaces & Landscape 4. Buildings – Style & Detail 5. Highways & Byways 6. Sports & rural Pursuits Summary Guidelines & Action Points Double page spread of parish map in the centre of document Appendix: Listed Buildings & Artefacts in Parish 1 What is a Village Design Statement? A Village Design Statement (VDS) highlights the qualities, style, building materials, characteristics and landscape setting of a parish, which are valued by its residents. The background, advice and guidelines given herein should be taken into account by developers, builders and residents before considering development. The development policies for the Frensham Parish area are the “saved Policies” derived from Waverley Borough Council’s Local Plan 2002, (which has now been superseded. It is proposed that the Frensham VDS should be Supplementary Planning Guidance, related to Saved Policy D4 ‘Design and Layout’. Over recent years the Parish Council Planning Committee, seeing very many applications relating to our special area, came to the conclusion that our area has individual and special aspirations that we wish to see incorporated into the planning system. Hopefully this will make the Parish’s aspirations clearer to those submitting applications to the Borough Council and give clear policy guidance. This document cannot be exhaustive but we hope that we have included sufficient detail to indicate what we would like to conserve in our village, and how we would like to see it develop. This VDS is a ‘snapshot’ reflecting the Parish’s views and situation in2008, and may need to be reviewed in the future in line with changing local needs, and new Waverley, regional and national plans and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Collaboration in Surrey
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL COUNCIL 23 FEBRUARY 2021 Title: Local Government Collaboration in Surrey Portfolio Holder: Cllr J Ward, Leader Senior Officer: T Horwood, Chief Executive Key decision: No Access: Public 1. Purpose and summary 1.1 The purpose of this report is to update the Council on progress on local government collaboration since the Council and Executive discussions of 22 July and 8 September 2020 respectively, and to allow Council to debate opportunities for future collaboration among local authorities in the light of the KPMG report, and this report. 2. Recommendation The Executive has: 1. Noted the KPMG report on future opportunities for local government in Surrey; 2. Endorsed the development of an initial options appraisal for collaboration with Guildford Borough Council; and 3. Allocated the remaining £15,000 budget previously approved for “a unitary council proposal” to “exploring collaboration opportunities with other councils”. The Executive recommend to the Council that it debate opportunities for future collaboration among local authorities in the light of the KPMG report and this report. 3. Reason for the recommendation 3.1 This report updates councillors and the public on the progress made in the discussions on local government reorganisation and collaboration in Surrey. 3.2 At Executive meetings in 2020, £30,000 was allocated “to support preparatory work for a unitary council proposal”. It is now recommended to allocate the remaining £15,000 to support the development of proposals for council collaboration, to be reported back to the Executive in due course. 4. Background context 4.1 A detailed update was provided to the Executive at its meeting on 8 September 2020,1 and is summarised as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Future Congestion Programme 2014
    Congestion Programme 2014 i Foreword Surrey is renowned for its strong economy and high quality environment of open countryside and historic market towns. It is a great place in which to live, work and do business. However, congestion and past lack of investment in transport infrastructure are having a negative impact on Surrey’s economic competitiveness. Managing congestion on Surrey’s roads – which are some of the busiest in the country - is urgently needed to improve traffic flow and to avoid wasting time in traffic jams and losing business through delayed journeys. Surrey Future, which brings together local authorities and businesses to agree strategic infrastructure priorities for Surrey, have developed this Congestion Programme to help ensure Surrey’s economy remains strong and that planned growth set out in local plans is managed in a sustainable way. Building on the Surrey Transport Plan Congestion Strategy (2011), it sets out a strategic programme for tackling Surrey’s road congestion problems. We consulted with a wide range of residents, businesses and organisations during 2013 on a draft version of this Congestion Programme, and a number of changes have been made to this final version as a result of the comments we received. Those who responded broadly supported the aims and approach of the programme and we will work together with businesses, Local Enterprise Partnerships, new Local Transport Bodies and Government to help deliver our programme. We would like to thank all those who responded and contributed to making this programme as relevant and up-to-date as possible. Local Transport Strategies are now being developed for each district and borough and there will be consultations on these during 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal Sector Council Alternative Sector Name Month (Dates)
    POSTAL COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE SECTOR NAME MONTH (DATES) SECTOR BN15 0 Adur District Council Sompting, Coombes 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN15 8 Adur District Council Lancing (Incl Sompting (South)) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN15 9 Adur District Council Lancing (Incl Sompting (North)) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN42 4 Adur District Council Southwick 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN43 5 Adur District Council Old Shoreham, Shoreham 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN43 6 Adur District Council Kingston By Sea, Shoreham-by-sea 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN12 5 Arun District Council Ferring, Goring-by-sea 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 1 Arun District Council East Preston 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 2 Arun District Council Rustington (South), Brighton 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 3 Arun District Council Rustington, Brighton 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 4 Arun District Council Angmering 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 5 Arun District Council Littlehampton (Incl Climping) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 6 Arun District Council Littlehampton (Incl Wick) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 7 Arun District Council Wick, Lyminster 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN18 0 Arun District Council Yapton, Walberton, Ford, Fontwell 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN18 9 Arun District Council Arundel (Incl Amberley, Poling, Warningcamp)
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteenth Report of Session 2006–07
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Fourteenth Report of Session 2006–07 Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 28 March 2007 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 28 March 2007 HL Paper 86 HC 82-xiv Published on 3 April 2007 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Current membership House of Lords House of Commons Earl Attlee (Conservative) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat) (Chairman) Baroness Gale (Labour) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods MP (Labour, City of Durham) Lord Gould of Brookwood (Labour) Mr Peter Bone MP (Conservative, Wellingborough) Lord Kimball (Conservative) Michael Jabez Foster MP (Labour, Hastings and Rye) Countess of Mar (Crossbench) Mr David Kidney MP (Labour, Stafford) Lord Walpole (Crossbench) Mr John MacDougall MP (Labour, Central Fife) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Powers The full constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Order No. 151 and House of Lords Standing Order No. 74, available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk/jcsi. Remit The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) is appointed to consider statutory instruments made in exercise of powers granted by Act of Parliament. Instruments not laid before Parliament are included within the Committee's remit; but local instruments and instruments made by devolved administrations are not considered by JCSI unless they are required to be laid before Parliament. The role of the JCSI, whose membership is drawn from both Houses of Parliament, is to assess the technical qualities of each instrument that falls within its remit and to decide whether to draw the special attention of each House to any instrument on one or more of the following grounds: i.
    [Show full text]
  • Crosswater Lane, Churt, Farnham, Surrey, GU10
    SERVICES Mains gas, electricity and water. LOCAL AUTHORITY Waverley Borough Council, Godalming DISCLAIMER Winkworth Estate Agents wish to inform any prospective purchaser that these sales particulars were prepared in good faith and should be used as a general guide only. We have not carried out a detailed survey, nor tested any services, appliances or fittings. The measurements are approximate, rounded and are taken between internal walls often incorporating cupboards and alcoves. They should not be relied upon when purchasing fittings including carpets, curtains or appliances. Curtains/blinds, carpets and appliances whether fitted or not are deemed removable by the vendor unless they are specifically mentioned within these sales particulars Crosswater Lane, Churt, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 Guide Price £850,000 A charming attached period cottage in need of some renovation set in this stunning position next to Frensham Common, within grounds of approximately 1 acre. EPC rating (E) Tel 01252 733042 Email [email protected] Tel 01252 733042 99 West Street, Farnham, GU9 7EN Email [email protected] 99 West Street, Farnham, GU9 7EN Independent proprietor: Tarrant & Robertson Limited trading as Winkworth ACCOMMODATION Drawing Room, Dining Room, Kitchen, Study, Boiler/Utility Room, Bedroom with ensuite, Three further Bedrooms and Family Bathroom, Garden DESCRIPTION A delightful four bedroom attached period cottage constructed of brick and stone under a clay tile roof with parts dating back 400 years. The cottage is full of charm and plenty of character features, and is set within its own stunning grounds with a stream in a desirable location in Churt. Crosswater Farm has recently had a portion of the property sectioned off to form a separate property that is not included in the sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Frensham Great Pond and Common Site Amenities Upgrade Project Pdf 976 Kb
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL EXECUTIVE - 01 MARCH 2016 Title: FRENSHAM GREAT POND & COMMON SITE AMENITIES UPGRADE PROJECT [Portfolio Holder: Cllr Simon Thornton] [Wards Affected: Frensham, Dockenfield and Tilford] Note pursuant to Section 100B(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 An annexe to this report contains exempt information by virtue of which the public is likely to be excluded during the item to which the report relates, as specified in Paragraph 3 of Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, namely:- Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information). Summary and purpose: The purpose of this report is to provide the Executive with an update on progress in delivering the Frensham Great Pond and Common amenities upgrade project and to seek various approvals to progress the project further. How this report relates to the Council’s Corporate Priorities: Customer Service Through a proposed revision to car park management on site, there will be improved customer service delivery from the Council’s ranger team, who will be able to spend more time managing the site and the visitors rather than taking car parking income. Environment The project supports the Environment, by protecting the Frensham Common and Pond SSSI through the careful planning and designing of the scheme and ensuring this development is sensitive to the planning constraints of the local area. The proposed area for the new building and reconfigured carpark is just outside the SSSI area. The building will aspire to be as close to zero carbon as possible, with the use of sustainable materials throughout as well as minimum energy requirement during its operation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cranleigh Railway Line
    Reinstating Rail and River Routes from Guildford - The Cranleigh Railway Line This article relates to a planning application WA/2020/0004 dated 02 January 2020 and placed before Waverley Borough Council by the Wey and Arun Canal Trust. It concerns the conflicts of interest that arise between various organisations; together with a wider question about transport infrastructure and connectivity at both local and national levels Our colleagues at Gru- Guildford Railway Users Group recently alerted us that a Waverley Council decision is still pending for the planning application to which both Gru, The Guildford Society and others have objected. Since the application date, various transport reports and government announcements have also been made which we feel have a bearing on this decision. Opened In 1816, The Wey & Arun Junction Canal linked the Wey Navigation near Guildford to the south coast via the Arun Navigation. It was intended to provide a safe, efficient route from the River Thames and London to Portsmouth to carry goods supplying the naval dockyards. However, the arrival of the railways led to its demise and by 1871 it was formally closed and over the passing years the canal fell into a state of disrepair and non-use. WACT is gradually trying to reinstate the canal that used to connect these two navigable rivers between the Thames and the South Coast and have had loyal support and much success in restoring many miles of waterway for use by leisure craft. However, a number of canal sections remain to be joined up and the WACT have various projects towards this aim.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Candidates 2016 Full List
    Reading U.B.C. Abbey (1) Joe Sylvester Reading U.B.C. Battle (1) Alan Lockey Reading U.B.C. Caversham (1) David Foster Reading U.B.C. Church (1) Kathryn McCann Reading U.B.C. Katesgrove (1) Louise Keane Reading U.B.C. Kentwood (1) Ruth Shaffrey Reading U.B.C. Mapledurham (1) Brent Smith Reading U.B.C. Minster (1) Keith Johnson Reading U.B.C. Norcot (1) Jill Wigmore-Welsh Reading U.B.C. Park (1) Brenda McGonigle Reading U.B.C. Peppard (1) Sally Newman Reading U.B.C. Redlands (1) Kizzi Murtagh Reading U.B.C. Southcote (1) Doug Cresswell Reading U.B.C. Thames (1) Sarah McNamara Reading U.B.C. Tilehurst (1) Miriam Kennet Reading U.B.C. Whitley (1) Richard Black Wokingham U.D.C. Bulmershe & Whitegates (2) Adrian Windisch Wokingham U.D.C. Emmbrook (1) David Worley Wokingham U.D.C. Finchampstead North (1) Martyn Foss Wokingham U.D.C. Finchampstead South (1) Matthew Valler Wokingham U.D.C. Norreys (1) Anthea West Wokingham U.D.C. Remenham (1) Kezia Black Wokingham U.D.C. Shinfield South (1) Thomas Blomley Wokingham U.D.C. Wescott (1) David Chapman Wokingham U.D.C. Winnersh (1) Stephen Lloyd Milton Keynes B.C. Olney (1) Catherine Jean Rose Milton Keynes B.C. Stantonbury (1) Alexander Watson Fraser Milton Keynes B.C. Wolverton (1) Jennifer McElvie Marklew South Buckinghamshire B.C.Farnham Royal and Hedgerley (1) Ryan Sains Hastings B.C. Ashdown (1) Gabriel Carlyle Hastings B.C. Baird (1) Al Dixon Hastings B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Bourne Club History – June 2019
    • History History 1920s The Club was built on the site of Bourne Lodge, Farnham, on land purchased from Colonel Phillips in the early 1920s at a cost of £433. Funds for building courts and premises were raised by debentures issued in the amount of £2,500. The first Committee meeting was held on 7th January 1923. Members of the Committee were duly elected, with Sir Stanley Bois becoming the first President, Major Lonsdale the Hon. Secretary and Mr Brierley the Hon. Treasurer. It was unanimously resolved that the Club be called The Bourne Club, and a total of 160 members were recorded. Original 1st Debenture Issued During 1923 it was agreed that four asphalt Tennis courts be constructed, as well as a hall for Badminton, a card room for Bridge, a small tearoom, dressing room facilities and a croquet lawn. 1924 A small office (in the form of a shed) was erected for the Hon. Secretary, near the (currently unused) soft drinks vending machine site. The original front door to the Club was located by the veranda and is now the entrance to the main changing rooms and gym. An account was opened at Lloyds Bank, Farnham. Badminton was played extensively with matches arranged against other clubs in the area. 1925 The first Tennis tournament was held. 1927 It was agreed that since the existing asphalt was not a popular surface, two of the Tennis courts would be converted to “Fernden” courts. These courts required more maintenance, and so the services of a Steward were engaged for this purpose as well as for general Club upkeep.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes July 2020
    ALFOLD PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES of the Alfold Parish Council Annual Meeting held on Tuesday 14th July 2020 held via Zoom at 7.30pm. Present: Mrs Penni Mayne (Chairman), Mr. Adrian Erricker (Vice Chairman), Mr. Rick Dyer, Mrs. Mary Brown, Mr Denton-Miller Mr. Chris Britton, Mr. Wayne Mouring, Mrs Julie Flenley (Clerk), Mr. Kevin Deanus (WBC Councillor). Two members of the public were in attendance. Apologies: None ACTION 20/074 Representations from members of the public. None. 20/075 To receive declarations of interest pertaining to agenda items. None 20/076 To receive for confirmation Minutes of Meeting held on 11th June 2020. Agreed. 20/077 Chairman’s report Cllr Mayne reported that Dan Church was happy with the work Titchmarsh’s carried out on the adjacent cemetery land and that he had commenced building of his fence. There was also some more general cleaning up of the Cllr Mayne cemetery to be done and that a working party would be looked at in the and Cllr future to carry out the works. Erricker Cllr Mayne also reported that correspondence had been received from a Loxwood resident about pre application on a site at Loxwood Claypits. The Clerk had conducted preliminary searches but found no further information in the public domain but will await a response back from her email. Cllr Mayne noted that a meeting had not been diarised for August but would schedule a meeting if anything was to come in. Also noted that Cllr Britton would be attending a meeting with Surrey Highways with regards to improvements in the village.
    [Show full text]